SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 57
Download to read offline
Manual Material Handling
MANUAL LIFTING TASK EVALUATION
NIOSH ORIGINAL LIFTING MODEL
• In 1981, NIOSH published the Work Practices Guide
(WPG) for Manual Lifting.
• WPG defines a manual lifting task as the act of
manually grasping and raising an object of a definable
size without mechanical aids.
• The WPG was based on the fact that ‘an over exertion
injury is the result of job demands that exceed a
worker’s capacity’.
MANUAL LIFTING TASK EVALUATION
NIOSH ORIGINAL LIFTING MODEL
Strain Index (SI) = Job demands / worker capacity
Therefore, if strain index exceeds 1.0 possibility of
overexertion injury.
MANUAL LIFTING TASK EVALUATION
NIOSH ORIGINAL LIFTING MODEL
The 1981 WPG presented a mathematical equation
for determination of an Action Limit (AL) for manual lifting
task.
Action limit (AL): Magnitude of weight in a given lifting
situation, which would result in Low Back Disorder risk
along a risk continuum.
AL indicates whether a manual materials handling task is
safe or risky.
1981 NIOSH Lifting Guide
If the weight of the object is below the AL, the job is
considered safe.
If the weight lifted by the worker is larger than the AL –
Risk at work.
Assessment tools or guides
MANUAL LIFTING TASK EVALUATION
NIOSH ORIGINAL LIFTING MODEL
NIOSH divided the lifting tasks into three classes:
• Acceptable (below AL)
• Unacceptable for most individuals (above the MPL) -
engineering controls
• Unacceptable for some individuals (between AL and Maximum
Permissible Limit, or MPL) - administrative controls
1981 NIOSH Lifting Guide
The general form of AL is defined according to Equation:
AL = k (HF) (VF) (DF) (FF)
AL = Action limit.
K = load constant (40 kg or 90 lb), greatest weight (kg or lb) a subject could
lift if all lifting conditions are optimal.
HF = Horizontal factor. Horizontal location (H) of the hands at the origin of
lift, measured from midpoint between ankles ( in cm or inches). H must be
between 15 to 80 cm (6 – 32 inch). The minimum 15 cm (6 inch) is due to
body interference.
The original NIOSH lifting equation
1981 NIOSH Lifting Guide
AL = k (HF) (VF) (DF) (FF)
VF = Vertical factor. Vertical location (V) of the hands at origin of lift,
measured from floor level (in cm or inches). V must be between 0 to 175
cm (0 – 70 inch), which is the range of vertical location of most of
individuals.
DF = Distance factor. Vertical travel distance (D) from origin to destination
of lift (in cm or inches). D must be between 25 cm (10 inch) and (200 – V)
cm [(80 – V) inch]. If travel distance is less than 25 cm (10 inch), then D =
25 cm (10 inch) must be used.
The original NIOSH lifting equation
1981 NIOSH Lifting Guide
AL = k (HF) (VF) (DF) (FF)
FF = Frequency factor. Average number of lifts per minute. F must be
between 0.2 (one lift every 5 min) and Fmax. If the frequency of lift is less
than once per 5 min, F = 0.
Maximum frequency of lifting (Fmax ), which is determined based on the
duration of period of the task during the work-shift.
Lifting is assumed to be occasional (less than 1 hr) or continuous (more
than 1 hr, upto 8 hrs).
The original NIOSH lifting equation
1981 NIOSH Lifting Guide
AL = k (HF) (VF) (DF) (FF)
Table: Maximum lifts per minute (Fmax)
Average Vertical Location (V) in cm or inch
Period Standing V>75 (30) Stooped V ≤ 75 (30)
1 hr 18 15
8 hr (>1Hr) 15 12
Source: NIOSH, Work practices Guide for manual lifting, 1981.
The original NIOSH lifting equation
1981 NIOSH Lifting Guide
AL = k (HF) (VF) (DF) (FF)
AL (kg): = 40 * (15 / H) * [(1-0.004 * (V – 75)] * (0.7+ 7.5/D) * (1 – F/Fmax)
Source: NIOSH, Work practices Guide for manual lifting, 1981.
The original NIOSH lifting equation
1981 NIOSH Lifting Guide
In calculating the four modifying factors (HF, VF, DF and FF), it should be
noted that each factor has to be less than or equal to 1.
If a factor exceeds 1 or falls below lower range, an error has been made.
If the lifting conditions are ideal a worker could safely hold and lift
the load constant, k (40 kg or 90 lb).
Assessment tools or guides
Source: NIOSH, Work practices Guide for manual lifting, 1981.
• Did not consider asymmetry
• Needed consideration of quality of coupling
Limitations of the NIOSH Lifting Model
PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS
The revised equation has three principal components:
• Recommended weight limit (RWL).
• Load constant (LC)
• Multipliers
NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
Recommended weight limit
The revised equation multiplies the load constant by the
six multipliers to determine a RWL:
RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
• LC is the maximum load that can be lifted safely, given
that the conditions of lift, as defined by the multipliers,
are all optimal.
• The load constant has been reduced from 40 kg to 23
kg in the revised equation.
RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
Multipliers
• The revised NIOSH lifting equation consists of six
multipliers (Waters et al, 1994).
• Depending on the lifting conditions, these multipliers
decrease the LC to determine the amount of weight that
can be lifted safely, or RWL.
NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
• H: Horizontal location of the hands (Load center) from the midpoint
between the ankles, measured at the origin and destination of the
lift.
• In those cases where H can not be measured, H can be estimated
as:
H = 20 + L/2 for V ≥ 25 cm
H = 25 + L/2 for V < 25 cm
• L is the length of the container being handled and V is the location
of the hands (relative to standing surface) at the origin of the lift.
NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
Hand Location
Horizontal Location
EXAMPLE
For V ≥ 25 cm, H = 20 + L/2
If L = 30 cm, H = 20 + 30/2 or H = 35 cm.
For V < 25 cm, H = 25 + L/2 (bottom layer cartons).
In this case H = 25 + 30/2 or H = 40 cm
If H is measured to be less than 25 cm, then use a minimum value
of H = 25 cm.
The maximum value of H should assume is 63 cm.
Horizontal multiplier (HM) can be calculated from the formula 25/H
NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
• V: Vertical location of hands from the standing surface measured
at the origin of the lift. .
• V can range from 0 to 175 cm (upper safe limit of lifting).
NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
Vertical Location
Vertical multiplier (VM) is based on the location of the gripping
surface on each carton.
In case of the card board cartons, with no handles, cartons are
gripped from the bottom.
Vertical multiplier (HM) can be calculated from the formula:
VM = [1 – (0.003*(V – 75)]
NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
• D: Vertical travel distance between the location of the hands at the
origin and the destination of the lift.
• D must be in the range of 25 ≤ D ≤ 175 cm.
• If the measured value of D is less than 25 cm, then the minimum
value of D = 25 cm must be used in the RWL calculation.
NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
Distance multiplier (DM) determined as the distance from
the origin of the lift to the destination of the lift.
Distance multiplier (DM) can be calculated from the formula:
DM = (0.82 + 4.5/D)
NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
Angle of asymmetry: the angular displacement of the
load from the sagittal plane, measured from the origin
and/or the destination of the lift (degrees).
Asymmetry line = Line joining the midpoint between the
ankle with the midpoint of the hands projected on the
floor.
RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
00 ≤ A ≤ 1350
AM = (1 – 0.0032A)
Use of larger angles (A) at origin and destination
If A > 1350, AM = 0
RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
Coupling V< 75 cm (30 inches) V ≥ 75 cm (30 inches)
Good 1.0 1.0
Fair 0.95 1.0
Poor 0.90 0.90
NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
Good
Handle
• L ≥ 11.5 cm, Dia 1.9 – 3.8 cm, clearance ≥ 5 cm
• Cylindrical shape and a smooth non-slip
surface.
Hand-hold cut-out
• L ≥ 11.5 cm, clearance ≥ 5 cm semi- oval
shape.
Container
• Frontal length ≤ 40 cm, H ≤ 30 cm, smooth non-
slip surface.
COUPLING (C)
Fair
• Less than optimal design (as in case of good)
• Container: No handle or cut out. A worker should be
capable of clamping fingers at nearly 900 under the
container (lifting cardboard box from floor).
COUPLING (C)
Poor
• No handles or hand hold cut outs
• Irregular bulky objects.
• Frontal length > 40 cm, height > 30 cm, rough or slipping
surface, sharp edges, asymmetric center of mass,
unstable containers.
COUPLING (C)
Frequency multiplier: Lifts per minute
1. Short duration (work upto 1 hr, recovery at least 120%
of work time)
2. Moderate duration (work upto 2 hrs, recovery at least
30% of work time)
3. Long duration (work upto 8 hr without additional
fatigue allowances other than normally given during
the workshift)
NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
Maximum Allowable Frequency
Lifting Duration Vertical Location of lift
V< 75 cm V > 75cm
(30 inches ) (30 inches)
< 1 Hour 12 15
< 2 Hours 10 12
< 8 Hours 8 10
Frequency
Lifts/min
(F)
Work Duration
< 1 hr > 1 but < 2 hr > 2 but < 8 hr
V < 75 cm
(30 in)
V > 75 cm
(30 in)
V < 75 cm
(30 in)
V > 75 cm
(30 in)
V < 75 cm
(30 in)
V > 75 cm
(30 in)
<0.2
0.5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
>15
1.00
0.97
0.94
0.91
0.88
0.84
0.80
0.75
0.70
0.60
0.52
0.45
0.41
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.97
0.94
0.91
0.88
0.84
0.80
0.75
0.70
0.60
0.52
0.45
0.41
0.37
0.34
0.31
0.28
0.00
0.95
0.92
0.88
0.84
0.79
0.72
0.60
0.50
0.42
0.35
0.30
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.95
0.92
088
0.84
0.79
0.72
0.60
0.50
0.42
0.35
0.30
0.26
0.23
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.85
0.81
0.75
0.65
0.65
0.45
0.35
0.27
0.22
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.85
0.81
0.75
0.65
0.55
0.45
0.35
0.27
0.22
0.18
0.15
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(Source: Reprinted from NIOSH, Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation)
RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
COMPARISON
Load constant and
and multipliers 1981 Equation 1991 Equation
LC 40 kg 23kg
HM 15/H 25/H
VM 1-0.004(V-75) 1-0.003(V-75)
DM 0.7 + 7.5/D 0.82 + 4.5/D
FM 1 – F/Fmax From Table
AM NA 1 – 0.0032A
CM NA From Table
Lifting index
Lifting index (LI) = Load weight / RWL
LI greater than one presents a risk of
overexertion injury.
Waters et al, 1994
This recommendation applies to most workers for:
• two-handed lifting,
• comfortable environments and non-slip floorings
Applicability
The Revised NIOSH Lifting equation does not apply in
situations where a person is lifting (or lowering):
• for over 8 hours
• while seated or kneeling
• while pushing or pulling
Restriction
The Composite Lifting Index (CLI)
STLI + ∑ delta LI
Frequency
Lifts/min
(F)
Work Duration
< 1 hr > 1 but < 2 hr > 2 but < 8 hr
V < 75 cm
(30 in)
V > 75 cm
(30 in)
V < 75 cm
(30 in)
V > 75 cm
(30 in)
V < 75 cm
(30 in)
V > 75 cm
(30 in)
<0.2
0.5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
>15
1.00
0.97
0.94
0.91
0.88
0.84
0.80
0.75
0.70
0.60
0.52
0.45
0.41
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.97
0.94
0.91
0.88
0.84
0.80
0.75
0.70
0.60
0.52
0.45
0.41
0.37
0.34
0.31
0.28
0.00
0.95
0.92
0.88
0.84
0.79
0.72
0.60
0.50
0.42
0.35
0.30
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.95
0.92
088
0.84
0.79
0.72
0.60
0.50
0.42
0.35
0.30
0.26
0.23
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.85
0.81
0.75
0.65
0.65
0.45
0.35
0.27
0.22
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.85
0.81
0.75
0.65
0.55
0.45
0.35
0.27
0.22
0.18
0.15
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(Source: Reprinted from NIOSH, Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation)
RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
Coupling V< 75 cm (30 inches) V ≥ 75 cm (30 inches)
Good 1.0 1.0
Fair 0.95 1.0
Poor 0.90 0.90
NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
To prevent occupational back injuries, it is essential to
identify and control the factors of MMH.
1. Organization of workflow
2. Job design/redesign (including environment)
3. Pre-placement screening, wherever necessary
4. Training
How can we prevent back injury
resulting from MMH?
• Poor planning of the workflow results in repeated
handling of the same object.
• Avoid Double handling.
MMH Factors
1. Organization of work flow
2. Job design/redesign
a. Eliminate heavy MMH
b. Decrease MMH demands
c. Reduce stressful body movements
d. Improve environmental conditions
MMH Factors
• Powered or mechanical arm for heavy MMH tasks.
• Mechanical arms lower the risk for back injury
• Mechanical aids like lift tables, conveyors, Pulleys or
fork lifts.
2. Job design/redesign
a. Eliminate heavy MMH
MMH Factors
• Decrease the weight of handled objects to acceptable
limits.
• Assign two people, split the load into two or more
containers.
b. Decrease MMH demands
MMH Factors
2. Job design/redesign
• Change the type of MMH movement. Pulling objects is
easier than carrying. Pushing is less demanding than
pulling.
• Alternate heavy tasks with lighter ones to reduce the
build-up of fatigue.
b. Decrease MMH demands
MMH Factors
2. Job design/redesign
• Keep all materials at waist height.
• Eliminate deep shelves to avoid bending.
• Locate objects within easy reach.
• Change the shape of the load so that the load can be
handled close to the body.
c. Reduce stressful body movements
MMH Factors
2. Job design/redesign
• Illuminate the work area for MMH tasks at the level of
200 lux.
• Use task lights or other additional light sources to
improve visibility
• Use angular lighting and colour contrast to improve
depth perception especially during climbing stairs or
moving in through passage ways.
d. Improve environmental conditions
MMH Factors
2. Job design/redesign
• Pre-placement screening may be useful as a preventive
measure for the jobs involving heavy MMH.
3. Pre-placement screening
MMH Factors
- make the worker aware of the hazards of MMH
- demonstrate ways of avoiding unnecessary stress
-Ensure a good grip on the load.
4. Training
MMH Factors
✓ Walking surfaces that are uneven, sloping, wet,
icy, slippery, unsteady, etc.
✓ Poor housekeeping that causes slip, trip and fall
hazards
✓ Inadequate lighting
✓Cold or very hot and humid working conditions
✓ Space is small or posture is constrained or both.
Hazardous working condition
1981 NIOSH Lifting Guide
Table: Maximum lifts per minute (Fmax)
Average Vertical Location (V) in cm or inch
Period Standing V>75 (3) Stooped V ≤ 75 (3)
1 hr 18 15
8 hr (>1Hr) 15 12
Source: NIOSH, Work practices Guide for manual lifting, 1981.

More Related Content

What's hot

Free body diagrams
Free body diagramsFree body diagrams
Free body diagrams
TekZeno
 

What's hot (12)

Free body diagrams
Free body diagramsFree body diagrams
Free body diagrams
 
Ergonomics lesson 4
Ergonomics lesson 4Ergonomics lesson 4
Ergonomics lesson 4
 
Ergonomics Environment
Ergonomics EnvironmentErgonomics Environment
Ergonomics Environment
 
Cognitive ergonomics
Cognitive ergonomics Cognitive ergonomics
Cognitive ergonomics
 
Ergonomics
ErgonomicsErgonomics
Ergonomics
 
Introduction to Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) prevention
Introduction to Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) preventionIntroduction to Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) prevention
Introduction to Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) prevention
 
1. scope, origin & ergonomics
1. scope, origin & ergonomics1. scope, origin & ergonomics
1. scope, origin & ergonomics
 
Lumbar Spnine: Anatomy, Biomechanics and Pathomechanics
Lumbar Spnine: Anatomy, Biomechanics and PathomechanicsLumbar Spnine: Anatomy, Biomechanics and Pathomechanics
Lumbar Spnine: Anatomy, Biomechanics and Pathomechanics
 
Friction, types of friction and different laws of friction
Friction, types of friction and different laws of frictionFriction, types of friction and different laws of friction
Friction, types of friction and different laws of friction
 
Sacroiliac joint biomechanics, dysfunctions, assessment and its manual therapy
Sacroiliac joint biomechanics, dysfunctions, assessment and its manual therapySacroiliac joint biomechanics, dysfunctions, assessment and its manual therapy
Sacroiliac joint biomechanics, dysfunctions, assessment and its manual therapy
 
Working with chronic musculoskeletal disorders
Working with chronic musculoskeletal disordersWorking with chronic musculoskeletal disorders
Working with chronic musculoskeletal disorders
 
Walking aids ppt (Tapas)
Walking aids ppt (Tapas)Walking aids ppt (Tapas)
Walking aids ppt (Tapas)
 

Recently uploaded

Tembisa Central Terminating Pills +27838792658 PHOMOLONG Top Abortion Pills F...
Tembisa Central Terminating Pills +27838792658 PHOMOLONG Top Abortion Pills F...Tembisa Central Terminating Pills +27838792658 PHOMOLONG Top Abortion Pills F...
Tembisa Central Terminating Pills +27838792658 PHOMOLONG Top Abortion Pills F...
drjose256
 
Artificial intelligence presentation2-171219131633.pdf
Artificial intelligence presentation2-171219131633.pdfArtificial intelligence presentation2-171219131633.pdf
Artificial intelligence presentation2-171219131633.pdf
Kira Dess
 
21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
rahulmanepalli02
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Tembisa Central Terminating Pills +27838792658 PHOMOLONG Top Abortion Pills F...
Tembisa Central Terminating Pills +27838792658 PHOMOLONG Top Abortion Pills F...Tembisa Central Terminating Pills +27838792658 PHOMOLONG Top Abortion Pills F...
Tembisa Central Terminating Pills +27838792658 PHOMOLONG Top Abortion Pills F...
 
SLIDESHARE PPT-DECISION MAKING METHODS.pptx
SLIDESHARE PPT-DECISION MAKING METHODS.pptxSLIDESHARE PPT-DECISION MAKING METHODS.pptx
SLIDESHARE PPT-DECISION MAKING METHODS.pptx
 
15-Minute City: A Completely New Horizon
15-Minute City: A Completely New Horizon15-Minute City: A Completely New Horizon
15-Minute City: A Completely New Horizon
 
Involute of a circle,Square, pentagon,HexagonInvolute_Engineering Drawing.pdf
Involute of a circle,Square, pentagon,HexagonInvolute_Engineering Drawing.pdfInvolute of a circle,Square, pentagon,HexagonInvolute_Engineering Drawing.pdf
Involute of a circle,Square, pentagon,HexagonInvolute_Engineering Drawing.pdf
 
UNIT-2 image enhancement.pdf Image Processing Unit 2 AKTU
UNIT-2 image enhancement.pdf Image Processing Unit 2 AKTUUNIT-2 image enhancement.pdf Image Processing Unit 2 AKTU
UNIT-2 image enhancement.pdf Image Processing Unit 2 AKTU
 
Interfacing Analog to Digital Data Converters ee3404.pdf
Interfacing Analog to Digital Data Converters ee3404.pdfInterfacing Analog to Digital Data Converters ee3404.pdf
Interfacing Analog to Digital Data Converters ee3404.pdf
 
litvinenko_Henry_Intrusion_Hong-Kong_2024.pdf
litvinenko_Henry_Intrusion_Hong-Kong_2024.pdflitvinenko_Henry_Intrusion_Hong-Kong_2024.pdf
litvinenko_Henry_Intrusion_Hong-Kong_2024.pdf
 
Artificial intelligence presentation2-171219131633.pdf
Artificial intelligence presentation2-171219131633.pdfArtificial intelligence presentation2-171219131633.pdf
Artificial intelligence presentation2-171219131633.pdf
 
Artificial Intelligence in due diligence
Artificial Intelligence in due diligenceArtificial Intelligence in due diligence
Artificial Intelligence in due diligence
 
Augmented Reality (AR) with Augin Software.pptx
Augmented Reality (AR) with Augin Software.pptxAugmented Reality (AR) with Augin Software.pptx
Augmented Reality (AR) with Augin Software.pptx
 
CLOUD COMPUTING SERVICES - Cloud Reference Modal
CLOUD COMPUTING SERVICES - Cloud Reference ModalCLOUD COMPUTING SERVICES - Cloud Reference Modal
CLOUD COMPUTING SERVICES - Cloud Reference Modal
 
Working Principle of Echo Sounder and Doppler Effect.pdf
Working Principle of Echo Sounder and Doppler Effect.pdfWorking Principle of Echo Sounder and Doppler Effect.pdf
Working Principle of Echo Sounder and Doppler Effect.pdf
 
21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
 
Insurance management system project report.pdf
Insurance management system project report.pdfInsurance management system project report.pdf
Insurance management system project report.pdf
 
analog-vs-digital-communication (concept of analog and digital).pptx
analog-vs-digital-communication (concept of analog and digital).pptxanalog-vs-digital-communication (concept of analog and digital).pptx
analog-vs-digital-communication (concept of analog and digital).pptx
 
NEWLETTER FRANCE HELICES/ SDS SURFACE DRIVES - MAY 2024
NEWLETTER FRANCE HELICES/ SDS SURFACE DRIVES - MAY 2024NEWLETTER FRANCE HELICES/ SDS SURFACE DRIVES - MAY 2024
NEWLETTER FRANCE HELICES/ SDS SURFACE DRIVES - MAY 2024
 
Developing a smart system for infant incubators using the internet of things ...
Developing a smart system for infant incubators using the internet of things ...Developing a smart system for infant incubators using the internet of things ...
Developing a smart system for infant incubators using the internet of things ...
 
Research Methodolgy & Intellectual Property Rights Series 1
Research Methodolgy & Intellectual Property Rights Series 1Research Methodolgy & Intellectual Property Rights Series 1
Research Methodolgy & Intellectual Property Rights Series 1
 
8th International Conference on Soft Computing, Mathematics and Control (SMC ...
8th International Conference on Soft Computing, Mathematics and Control (SMC ...8th International Conference on Soft Computing, Mathematics and Control (SMC ...
8th International Conference on Soft Computing, Mathematics and Control (SMC ...
 
UNIT 4 PTRP final Convergence in probability.pptx
UNIT 4 PTRP final Convergence in probability.pptxUNIT 4 PTRP final Convergence in probability.pptx
UNIT 4 PTRP final Convergence in probability.pptx
 

NIOSH.pdf

  • 2.
  • 3. MANUAL LIFTING TASK EVALUATION NIOSH ORIGINAL LIFTING MODEL • In 1981, NIOSH published the Work Practices Guide (WPG) for Manual Lifting. • WPG defines a manual lifting task as the act of manually grasping and raising an object of a definable size without mechanical aids. • The WPG was based on the fact that ‘an over exertion injury is the result of job demands that exceed a worker’s capacity’.
  • 4. MANUAL LIFTING TASK EVALUATION NIOSH ORIGINAL LIFTING MODEL Strain Index (SI) = Job demands / worker capacity Therefore, if strain index exceeds 1.0 possibility of overexertion injury.
  • 5. MANUAL LIFTING TASK EVALUATION NIOSH ORIGINAL LIFTING MODEL The 1981 WPG presented a mathematical equation for determination of an Action Limit (AL) for manual lifting task. Action limit (AL): Magnitude of weight in a given lifting situation, which would result in Low Back Disorder risk along a risk continuum. AL indicates whether a manual materials handling task is safe or risky.
  • 6. 1981 NIOSH Lifting Guide If the weight of the object is below the AL, the job is considered safe. If the weight lifted by the worker is larger than the AL – Risk at work. Assessment tools or guides
  • 7. MANUAL LIFTING TASK EVALUATION NIOSH ORIGINAL LIFTING MODEL NIOSH divided the lifting tasks into three classes: • Acceptable (below AL) • Unacceptable for most individuals (above the MPL) - engineering controls • Unacceptable for some individuals (between AL and Maximum Permissible Limit, or MPL) - administrative controls
  • 8. 1981 NIOSH Lifting Guide The general form of AL is defined according to Equation: AL = k (HF) (VF) (DF) (FF) AL = Action limit. K = load constant (40 kg or 90 lb), greatest weight (kg or lb) a subject could lift if all lifting conditions are optimal. HF = Horizontal factor. Horizontal location (H) of the hands at the origin of lift, measured from midpoint between ankles ( in cm or inches). H must be between 15 to 80 cm (6 – 32 inch). The minimum 15 cm (6 inch) is due to body interference. The original NIOSH lifting equation
  • 9. 1981 NIOSH Lifting Guide AL = k (HF) (VF) (DF) (FF) VF = Vertical factor. Vertical location (V) of the hands at origin of lift, measured from floor level (in cm or inches). V must be between 0 to 175 cm (0 – 70 inch), which is the range of vertical location of most of individuals. DF = Distance factor. Vertical travel distance (D) from origin to destination of lift (in cm or inches). D must be between 25 cm (10 inch) and (200 – V) cm [(80 – V) inch]. If travel distance is less than 25 cm (10 inch), then D = 25 cm (10 inch) must be used. The original NIOSH lifting equation
  • 10. 1981 NIOSH Lifting Guide AL = k (HF) (VF) (DF) (FF) FF = Frequency factor. Average number of lifts per minute. F must be between 0.2 (one lift every 5 min) and Fmax. If the frequency of lift is less than once per 5 min, F = 0. Maximum frequency of lifting (Fmax ), which is determined based on the duration of period of the task during the work-shift. Lifting is assumed to be occasional (less than 1 hr) or continuous (more than 1 hr, upto 8 hrs). The original NIOSH lifting equation
  • 11. 1981 NIOSH Lifting Guide AL = k (HF) (VF) (DF) (FF) Table: Maximum lifts per minute (Fmax) Average Vertical Location (V) in cm or inch Period Standing V>75 (30) Stooped V ≤ 75 (30) 1 hr 18 15 8 hr (>1Hr) 15 12 Source: NIOSH, Work practices Guide for manual lifting, 1981. The original NIOSH lifting equation
  • 12. 1981 NIOSH Lifting Guide AL = k (HF) (VF) (DF) (FF) AL (kg): = 40 * (15 / H) * [(1-0.004 * (V – 75)] * (0.7+ 7.5/D) * (1 – F/Fmax) Source: NIOSH, Work practices Guide for manual lifting, 1981. The original NIOSH lifting equation
  • 13. 1981 NIOSH Lifting Guide In calculating the four modifying factors (HF, VF, DF and FF), it should be noted that each factor has to be less than or equal to 1. If a factor exceeds 1 or falls below lower range, an error has been made. If the lifting conditions are ideal a worker could safely hold and lift the load constant, k (40 kg or 90 lb). Assessment tools or guides Source: NIOSH, Work practices Guide for manual lifting, 1981.
  • 14. • Did not consider asymmetry • Needed consideration of quality of coupling Limitations of the NIOSH Lifting Model
  • 15. PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS The revised equation has three principal components: • Recommended weight limit (RWL). • Load constant (LC) • Multipliers NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
  • 16. NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL Recommended weight limit The revised equation multiplies the load constant by the six multipliers to determine a RWL: RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
  • 17. NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL • LC is the maximum load that can be lifted safely, given that the conditions of lift, as defined by the multipliers, are all optimal. • The load constant has been reduced from 40 kg to 23 kg in the revised equation. RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
  • 18. Multipliers • The revised NIOSH lifting equation consists of six multipliers (Waters et al, 1994). • Depending on the lifting conditions, these multipliers decrease the LC to determine the amount of weight that can be lifted safely, or RWL. NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
  • 19. RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM • H: Horizontal location of the hands (Load center) from the midpoint between the ankles, measured at the origin and destination of the lift. • In those cases where H can not be measured, H can be estimated as: H = 20 + L/2 for V ≥ 25 cm H = 25 + L/2 for V < 25 cm • L is the length of the container being handled and V is the location of the hands (relative to standing surface) at the origin of the lift. NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL
  • 22. EXAMPLE For V ≥ 25 cm, H = 20 + L/2 If L = 30 cm, H = 20 + 30/2 or H = 35 cm. For V < 25 cm, H = 25 + L/2 (bottom layer cartons). In this case H = 25 + 30/2 or H = 40 cm If H is measured to be less than 25 cm, then use a minimum value of H = 25 cm. The maximum value of H should assume is 63 cm. Horizontal multiplier (HM) can be calculated from the formula 25/H NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
  • 23. • V: Vertical location of hands from the standing surface measured at the origin of the lift. . • V can range from 0 to 175 cm (upper safe limit of lifting). NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
  • 25. Vertical multiplier (VM) is based on the location of the gripping surface on each carton. In case of the card board cartons, with no handles, cartons are gripped from the bottom. Vertical multiplier (HM) can be calculated from the formula: VM = [1 – (0.003*(V – 75)] NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
  • 26. • D: Vertical travel distance between the location of the hands at the origin and the destination of the lift. • D must be in the range of 25 ≤ D ≤ 175 cm. • If the measured value of D is less than 25 cm, then the minimum value of D = 25 cm must be used in the RWL calculation. NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
  • 27. Distance multiplier (DM) determined as the distance from the origin of the lift to the destination of the lift. Distance multiplier (DM) can be calculated from the formula: DM = (0.82 + 4.5/D) NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
  • 28. NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL Angle of asymmetry: the angular displacement of the load from the sagittal plane, measured from the origin and/or the destination of the lift (degrees). Asymmetry line = Line joining the midpoint between the ankle with the midpoint of the hands projected on the floor. RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
  • 29. NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL 00 ≤ A ≤ 1350 AM = (1 – 0.0032A) Use of larger angles (A) at origin and destination If A > 1350, AM = 0 RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
  • 30. Coupling V< 75 cm (30 inches) V ≥ 75 cm (30 inches) Good 1.0 1.0 Fair 0.95 1.0 Poor 0.90 0.90 NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
  • 31. Good Handle • L ≥ 11.5 cm, Dia 1.9 – 3.8 cm, clearance ≥ 5 cm • Cylindrical shape and a smooth non-slip surface. Hand-hold cut-out • L ≥ 11.5 cm, clearance ≥ 5 cm semi- oval shape. Container • Frontal length ≤ 40 cm, H ≤ 30 cm, smooth non- slip surface. COUPLING (C)
  • 32. Fair • Less than optimal design (as in case of good) • Container: No handle or cut out. A worker should be capable of clamping fingers at nearly 900 under the container (lifting cardboard box from floor). COUPLING (C)
  • 33. Poor • No handles or hand hold cut outs • Irregular bulky objects. • Frontal length > 40 cm, height > 30 cm, rough or slipping surface, sharp edges, asymmetric center of mass, unstable containers. COUPLING (C)
  • 34. Frequency multiplier: Lifts per minute 1. Short duration (work upto 1 hr, recovery at least 120% of work time) 2. Moderate duration (work upto 2 hrs, recovery at least 30% of work time) 3. Long duration (work upto 8 hr without additional fatigue allowances other than normally given during the workshift) NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
  • 35. Maximum Allowable Frequency Lifting Duration Vertical Location of lift V< 75 cm V > 75cm (30 inches ) (30 inches) < 1 Hour 12 15 < 2 Hours 10 12 < 8 Hours 8 10
  • 36. Frequency Lifts/min (F) Work Duration < 1 hr > 1 but < 2 hr > 2 but < 8 hr V < 75 cm (30 in) V > 75 cm (30 in) V < 75 cm (30 in) V > 75 cm (30 in) V < 75 cm (30 in) V > 75 cm (30 in) <0.2 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 >15 1.00 0.97 0.94 0.91 0.88 0.84 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.60 0.52 0.45 0.41 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.97 0.94 0.91 0.88 0.84 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.60 0.52 0.45 0.41 0.37 0.34 0.31 0.28 0.00 0.95 0.92 0.88 0.84 0.79 0.72 0.60 0.50 0.42 0.35 0.30 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.92 088 0.84 0.79 0.72 0.60 0.50 0.42 0.35 0.30 0.26 0.23 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.81 0.75 0.65 0.65 0.45 0.35 0.27 0.22 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.81 0.75 0.65 0.55 0.45 0.35 0.27 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Source: Reprinted from NIOSH, Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation) RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
  • 37. COMPARISON Load constant and and multipliers 1981 Equation 1991 Equation LC 40 kg 23kg HM 15/H 25/H VM 1-0.004(V-75) 1-0.003(V-75) DM 0.7 + 7.5/D 0.82 + 4.5/D FM 1 – F/Fmax From Table AM NA 1 – 0.0032A CM NA From Table
  • 38. Lifting index Lifting index (LI) = Load weight / RWL LI greater than one presents a risk of overexertion injury. Waters et al, 1994
  • 39. This recommendation applies to most workers for: • two-handed lifting, • comfortable environments and non-slip floorings Applicability
  • 40. The Revised NIOSH Lifting equation does not apply in situations where a person is lifting (or lowering): • for over 8 hours • while seated or kneeling • while pushing or pulling Restriction
  • 41. The Composite Lifting Index (CLI) STLI + ∑ delta LI
  • 42. Frequency Lifts/min (F) Work Duration < 1 hr > 1 but < 2 hr > 2 but < 8 hr V < 75 cm (30 in) V > 75 cm (30 in) V < 75 cm (30 in) V > 75 cm (30 in) V < 75 cm (30 in) V > 75 cm (30 in) <0.2 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 >15 1.00 0.97 0.94 0.91 0.88 0.84 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.60 0.52 0.45 0.41 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.97 0.94 0.91 0.88 0.84 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.60 0.52 0.45 0.41 0.37 0.34 0.31 0.28 0.00 0.95 0.92 0.88 0.84 0.79 0.72 0.60 0.50 0.42 0.35 0.30 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.92 088 0.84 0.79 0.72 0.60 0.50 0.42 0.35 0.30 0.26 0.23 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.81 0.75 0.65 0.65 0.45 0.35 0.27 0.22 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.81 0.75 0.65 0.55 0.45 0.35 0.27 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Source: Reprinted from NIOSH, Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation) RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
  • 43. Coupling V< 75 cm (30 inches) V ≥ 75 cm (30 inches) Good 1.0 1.0 Fair 0.95 1.0 Poor 0.90 0.90 NIOSH REVISED LIFTING MODEL RWL = LC * HM * VM * DM * FM * AM * CM
  • 44. To prevent occupational back injuries, it is essential to identify and control the factors of MMH. 1. Organization of workflow 2. Job design/redesign (including environment) 3. Pre-placement screening, wherever necessary 4. Training How can we prevent back injury resulting from MMH?
  • 45. • Poor planning of the workflow results in repeated handling of the same object. • Avoid Double handling. MMH Factors 1. Organization of work flow
  • 46. 2. Job design/redesign a. Eliminate heavy MMH b. Decrease MMH demands c. Reduce stressful body movements d. Improve environmental conditions MMH Factors
  • 47. • Powered or mechanical arm for heavy MMH tasks. • Mechanical arms lower the risk for back injury • Mechanical aids like lift tables, conveyors, Pulleys or fork lifts. 2. Job design/redesign a. Eliminate heavy MMH MMH Factors
  • 48. • Decrease the weight of handled objects to acceptable limits. • Assign two people, split the load into two or more containers. b. Decrease MMH demands MMH Factors 2. Job design/redesign
  • 49. • Change the type of MMH movement. Pulling objects is easier than carrying. Pushing is less demanding than pulling. • Alternate heavy tasks with lighter ones to reduce the build-up of fatigue. b. Decrease MMH demands MMH Factors 2. Job design/redesign
  • 50. • Keep all materials at waist height. • Eliminate deep shelves to avoid bending. • Locate objects within easy reach. • Change the shape of the load so that the load can be handled close to the body. c. Reduce stressful body movements MMH Factors 2. Job design/redesign
  • 51. • Illuminate the work area for MMH tasks at the level of 200 lux. • Use task lights or other additional light sources to improve visibility • Use angular lighting and colour contrast to improve depth perception especially during climbing stairs or moving in through passage ways. d. Improve environmental conditions MMH Factors 2. Job design/redesign
  • 52. • Pre-placement screening may be useful as a preventive measure for the jobs involving heavy MMH. 3. Pre-placement screening MMH Factors
  • 53. - make the worker aware of the hazards of MMH - demonstrate ways of avoiding unnecessary stress -Ensure a good grip on the load. 4. Training MMH Factors
  • 54. ✓ Walking surfaces that are uneven, sloping, wet, icy, slippery, unsteady, etc. ✓ Poor housekeeping that causes slip, trip and fall hazards ✓ Inadequate lighting ✓Cold or very hot and humid working conditions ✓ Space is small or posture is constrained or both. Hazardous working condition
  • 55.
  • 56.
  • 57. 1981 NIOSH Lifting Guide Table: Maximum lifts per minute (Fmax) Average Vertical Location (V) in cm or inch Period Standing V>75 (3) Stooped V ≤ 75 (3) 1 hr 18 15 8 hr (>1Hr) 15 12 Source: NIOSH, Work practices Guide for manual lifting, 1981.