4. Pelagic Predators
“Pelagic predators (larger elasmobranchs, teleost fishes, squid, sea
turtles, seabirds, and marine mammals) congregate in the photic zone,
often in regions of increased primary production such as ocean current
divergences or convergences, regions of localized upwelling, fronts, or
eddies. They are generally large in body size compared to other marine
predators with relatively high metabolic rates. The combination of
these factors leads to relatively high average daily prey requirements. ”
7. “The diversity of living fishes. Below is a brief
listing of higher taxonomic categories of living
fishes, in phylogenetic order. This list is meant as
an introduction to major groups of living fishes
as they will be discussed in the initial two
sections of this book. Many intermediate
taxonomic levels, such as infraclasses,
subdivisions, and series, are not presented here;
they will be detailed when the actual groups are
discussed in Part III. Only a few representatives
of interesting or diverse groups are listed. Taxa
and illustrations from Nelson (2006). “
http://www.sisal.unam.mx/labeco/LAB_ECOLOGIA
/Ecologia_de_peces_files/The%20Diversity%20of%
20Fishes%20Biology,%20Evolution,%20and%20Eco
logy%20-
%20Helfman,%20Collette,%20Fracey%20%26amp
%3B%20Bowen,%202009.pdf
23. Elasmobranchs
“Elasmobranchs (sharks and rays) are a key group of marine predators,
suspected to mediate trophic cascades as top or meso-predatory
species (Myers et al., 2007; Baum and Worm, 2009; Heithaus et al.,
2012). In recent years, these species have attracted increasing scientific
concern due to the large declines in their population abundances (FAO,
1999; Baum and Myers, 2004; Ferretti et al., 2008, 2010) and a greater
understanding of their ecological importance (Heupel et al., 2014) and
high vulnerability to extinction risk (Camhi et al., 2008; García et al.,
2008; Dulvy et al., 2014).”
-- D. Das and P. Afonso
“Review of the Diversity, Ecology, and Conservation
of Elasmobranchs in the Azores Region, Mid-North Atlantic,”
Front. Mar. Sci., 06 November 2017
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2017.00354/full
27. Teleosts [“Bony”] Fishes
“Teleosts are the largest and most diverse group of vertebrates, and many
species undergo morphological, physiological, and behavioral transitions,
“metamorphoses,” as they progress between morphologically divergent life
stages. The larval metamorphosis that generally occurs as teleosts mature
from larva to juvenile involves the loss of embryo-specific features, the
development of new adult features, major remodeling of different organ
systems, and changes in physical proportions and overall phenotype. Yet, in
contrast to anuran amphibians, for example, teleost metamorphosis can
entail morphological change that is either sudden and profound, or relatively
gradual and subtle.”
-- “Metamorphosis in Teleosts,” K.McMenamin and David M.Parichy
Current Topics in Developmental Biology
Volume 103, 2013, Pages 127-165
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/teleost
34. Pelagic Squid
“Cephalopods play an integral role in open-ocean marine ecosystems
as dominant prey for many seabirds, marine mammals, and fishes, and
as major predators of fishes and invertebrates…
“Squid are short-lived ecological opportunists, and extremely rapid
growth rates and population turnover rates allow squid to respond
quickly to environmental and ecosystem change. Pelagic squid can
rapidly respond to ‘vacuums’ created in the ecosystem owing to the
removal of predators or competitors by fishing. The effects of rising
water temperatures associated with climate change may initially
appear predictable, to accelerate their fast life style. However, on closer
examination, researchers have predicted an extremely complex
response by inshore squid populations to climate change.”
http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/PFRP/nov06mtg/squid-meeting-2006-announce.pdf
35. “Cephalopods, especially squids, play a central role in many, if not most, marine
pelagic food webs by linking the massive biomasses of micronekton, particularly
myctophid fishes, to many oceanic predators (Cox et al., 2002; Olson and Watters,
2003; Griffiths et al., 2010). Given the high trophic flux passing through the squid
community, a concerted research effort on squids is critical to advancing our
understanding of their role as key prey and predators. Renewed interest in squid–
ecosystem dynamics is motivated by the recent remarkable range expansions and
the increase in biomass of the Humboldt or jumbo squid (Dosidicus gigas) in the
eastern Pacific Ocean (Field et al., 2013;Neira and Arancibia, 2013;Zeidberg and
Robison, 2007) and speculation about whether climate variability and/or fishing on
squid predators and competitors could have promoted the increase (Watters et al.,
2008;Zeidberg and Robison, 2008). Characterized by short life spans and fast
growth rates, squids may respond more readily to changes in the environment and
in the trophic structure than perhaps any other mid-trophic-level organism in the
open ocean (Rodhouse, 2013;Pecl and Jackson, 2008). In spite of their importance
in pelagic ecosystems, squids are not well understood. In part, this is because of
their ability to largely avoid capture by conventional marine sampling techniques.
Other factors, such as their complex taxonomy and minimal retention in stomachs
(Olson and Boggs, 1986), have meant that detailed information on their role in
many ocean ecosystems is lacking. However, a considerable amount of data on
squids as prey, based on the presence of indigestible beaks in stomach contents,
has been amassed over the last three decades. These data are now being
complemented by new technologies, including those able to track squid
movements (e.g. archival and satellite tags), and biochemical techniques capable of
identifying trophic position and the biochemical traces of squids in the tissues of
their predators, are helping to resolve some of the questions surrounding squids.”
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236878111_The_r
ole_of_squids_in_pelagic_ecosystems_An_overview
36. Squid Fishing at night
Catalina Island,
Southern California
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z5-ylCRtfI
52. Albatrosses (Diomedeidae)
“The albatrosses are under extensive taxonomic reclassification, and number between 14 and 24 species. Post-breeding movements of
albatrosses are mostly longitudinal; no species undertakes transequatorial movements. These birds range long distances from their colonies
during the nonbreeding period as well as during foraging trips undertaken while they are breeding. For example, six wandering albatrosses
equipped with satellite transmitters flew 3660–15,200 km during single foraging trips after being relieved by their mates from incubation
duties at the nest. Even breeding waved albatrosses (Phoebastria irrorata), with the smallest pelagic range among the group, have a round-
trip commute of no less than 2000 km between the breeding colony on the Galapagos Islands and the nearest edge of their foraging area
along the coast of Ecuador and Peru.
“Most albatross species range farthest from their colonies during the nonbreeding period. In fact, many species are partially migratory (as
opposed to being dispersers). As explained above, these species are considered as partially migratory because individuals are found in both
the wintering and breeding areas during winter, but do not winter (or winter in small numbers) between the two locations. For example,
Buller's (Thalassarche bulleri), Chatham (T. eremita), Salvin's (T. salvini), and shy (T. cauta) albatrosses breed on islands near New Zealand (the
first three) and Australia (shy). Although some birds stay near the colonies throughout the year, large proportions of the Buller’s, Chatham,
and Salvin's albatrosses migrate at least 8500 km eastward across the South Pacific to the coast of South America, and many shy albatrosses
migrate westward across the Indian Ocean to the coast of South Africa.
“Three other species, the wandering, black-browed (T. melanophris), and gray-headed (T. crysostoma) albatrosses, have breeding colonies
located circumpolarly across southern latitudes near 50°S. The South Georgia populations may be partially migratory, although the distinction
from dispersive is not clear. South Georgian wandering albatross fly north to waters off Argentina, and then eastward to important wintering
areas off South Africa. Some continue to Australian waters and may even circumnavigate the Southern Ocean. One of several of these birds
equipped with a satellite transmitter averaged 690 km/day. A large proportion (c. 85%) of South Georgian black-browed albatrosses also
winter off South Africa, and many South Georgian gray-headed albatrosses are thought to fly westward to waters off the Pacific coast of Chile,
and then to New Zealand.”
59. Evolution of Marine Mammals
“Abstract: The fossil record demonstrates that mammals re‐entered
the marine realm on at least seven separate occasions. Five of these
clades are still extant, whereas two are extinct. This review presents a
brief introduction to the phylogeny of each group of marine mammals,
based on the latest studies using both morphological and molecular
data. Evolutionary highlights are presented, focusing on changes
affecting the sensory systems, locomotion, breathing, feeding, and
reproduction in Cetacea, Sirenia, Desmostylia, and Pinnipedia.
Aquatic adaptations are specifically cited, supported by data from
morphological and geochemical studies. ”
-- M.D. Uhen “Evolution of marine mammals: Back to the sea after 300 million years,”
Anatomical Record
Volume 290, Issue 6, [Special Issue: Anatomical Adaptations of Aquatic Mammals]
June 2007 Pages 514-522
61. D.P. Hocking, et al. “A behavioural
framework for the evolution of
feeding in predatory aquatic
mammals,” 01 March, 2017
Proceedings of the Royal Society
B: Biological Sciences
Volume 284 Issue 1850
https://royalsocietypublishing.
org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.201
6.2750
https://www.researchgate.net/fig
ure/Revisions-to-the-prey-
capture-stage-to-be-incorporated-
into-our-behavioural-
framework_fig2_320059166
67. Fisheries: “HOW IMPORTANT IS FISHING?”
“Fishing and the activities surrounding it—processing,
packing, transport, and retailing—are important at
every scale, from the village level to the level of
national and international macroeconomics. For one,
fishing generates significant revenue. In 2000, the
global fish catch was worth US$81 billion when
landed at port; aquaculture production added
another US$57 billion (FAO 2002a); and the inter-
national fish trade totaled over US$55 billion (FAO
2002a).”
http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/pdf/fishanswer_fulltext.pdf
68. “Top Ten Fish
Producing Nations
(marine and inland,
wild capture and
aquaculture), 1960
and 2001”
http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files
/pdf/fishanswer_fulltext.pdf
70. “International Trade Increasingly
Influences Fishing”
“Trade has become a driving force in the global fishing enterprise, influencing the species
of fish targeted and farmed, the intensity of fishing pressure, and, in many cases, the
incentives for fishing either sustainably or destructively. Whether trade encourages
overfishing or is part of its solution can’t be answered with certainty. However,
it is likely that trade simply magnifies the environmental effects of existing fishing
practices. Where those practices are harmful, the effects of trade will be
compounded by for example, expanding the market for fish caught in this way, or by
providing easier market access to illegally harvested products.
Part of the problem is that the World Trade Organization (WTO) trade rules are often in
conflict with trade restrictions that aim to promote sustainable fishing practices. Some
steps to reconcile environment and trade rules would require granting observer status
at the WTO to the UN Environment Programme and to the secretariats of international
environmental treaties, incorporating the precautionary approach into WTO and other
trade rules, and reducing environmentally harmful fisheries Subsidies through
negotiations within the WTO and other trade bodies…”
http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/pdf/fishanswer_fulltext.pdf
75. “…the oceans of the world continue to suffer from the survival of the
philosophy of the commons. Maritime nations still respond
automatically to the shibboleth of the ‘freedom of the seas.’
Professing to believe in the ‘inexhaustible resources of the oceans,’
they bring species after species of fish and whales closer to
extinction.”
-- Garrett Hardin “The Tragedy of the Commons”
“The Tragedy of the Commons”