Criterion 3 NBA ug pharmacy understanding, setting and evaluating target level

1. NBA Criterion 3
full post mortem – Part I
For B. Pharm. Program as per PCI
syllabus, New Delhi
Ms. Snehal S. Chakorkar
(M. Pharm.)
Dr. Amit Gangwal
(M. Pharm., Ph. D. )1

2. Steps in Criterion 3
• Frame various COs according to PCI syllabus for
all semesters, all subjects. (3.1.1)
(https://www.slideshare.net/SnehalChakorkar/b-pharm-course-outcomes-according-to-pci-syllabus-fir-nba)
• Make CO-PO matrix (it means correlate above
COs with possible POs ranging from PO1 to
PO11). (3.1.2)
• For a perfect match with a particular PO, give 3
rating. For example if CO statement is perform
assay of aspirin tablet, then you have to give
rating as mentioned in next table.
2Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

3. CO
statement
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
Pharmacy
Knowledge
Planning
Abilities
Problem
analysis
Modern
tool
usage
Leadership
skills
Professional
Identity
Pharmaceuti
cal Ethics
Communi
cation
The
Pharmacist
& society
Environment
&
sustainability
Life-
long
learning
Perform
assay of
aspirin
tablet.
3 3 2 2 - - - - - - 3
Table no.: 1: CO-PO Mapping table
(3.1.2)
3Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

4. • Likewise for a significant mapping award 2,
for a shallow matching give 1 or else 0 for no
correlation at all.
Steps in Criterion 3 continue…
Next step is to make a rational summary ,
why you mapped with a particular PO with
fullest or least marks (0 to 3)
4Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

5. Table no.: 2: Following is the rational table
Program B pharmacy
Course Pharmaceutical Analysis I
Couse Code C203
Matching with PO/POs
Sr. No. CO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Correlation basis explanation
1
Perform assay of
aspirin tablet.
3 3 2 2 - - - - - - 3
PO1- This CO related with
pharmacy knowledge.
PO2- Practical techniques improves
planning ability.
PO3-By performing assay we can
solve the problem of impurity
PO4- We may use the software tools
to simplify the calculations.
PO11- Study of various techniques
of assay applied in pharmaceutical
industry for slifelong process.
(3.1.2)
5Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

6. Same procedure follow for all (First to Final
year Subjects).
Make an average of all course. (3.1.3)
6Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

7. Classify PCI level assessment tool
& your in-house developed
assessment tools, You may follow
following table. (3.2.1)
7Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

8. These are assessment tools for your
ready reference
Internal evaluation
tools
Theory examination
Practical examination
Assignment
Project
External evaluation
tools
Theory examination
Practical examination
(3.2.1)
8Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

9. Now we will understand about
calculation for attainment levels
(3.2.2)
9Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

10. Table no.: 3: 3.2.2. Record the attainment of Course
Outcomes of all courses with respect to set attainment levels
(University Theory Exam UTE & University Practical Exam UPE )
10
Course
code
Course
Name
Set attainment
marks
Attainment
level
111 Pharmaceutics-I
112 Pharmaceutical Inorganic Chemistry
113 Biochemistry –I
114 Anatomy, Physiology and Health Education-I
115 Pharmacognosy-I
116 Pharmaceutics-I-Lab
. .
. .
. .
488 Medicinal Chemistry-IV-Lab
489 Pharmaceutical Analysis-VI-Lab
4810 Pharmacology-IV-Lab
4811 Herbal Technology-Lab
(3.2.2)
Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

11. 11
Cours
e code
Course Name Internal Tool
ISE Continuous mode
Set attainment marks
(out of 25)
Attainment
Level
Set attainment
marks
Attainment
Level
Theory ISE Quiz, Assignment, OBT,
Seminar, GD and Field Trip
111 Pharmaceutics-I
112 Pharmaceutical Inorganic Chemistry
113 Biochemistry –I
114 Anatomy, Physiology and Health
Education-I
115 Pharmacognosy-I
Practical Experiment Synopsis & viva voce
116 Pharmaceutics-I-Lab
117 Pharmaceutical Inorganic Chemistry- Lab
118 Biochemistry –I-Lab
119 Anatomy, Physiology and Health
Education-I Lab
Table no.: 4:(Internal Sessional Exam ISE & Internal continuous assessment ICA) (3.2.2)
Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

12. What NBA Says
Screenshot taken from
NBA website. What
NBA Says
(3.2.2)
12Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

13. What does that mean ?
Understand from next table.
13Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

14. How to set target level ? (Exclusively for PCI pattern)
Set target level (Theory)
Internal (65%) External (55%)
After final calculations, its only 20 % will be
considered.
After final calculations, its only 80 % will be
considered.
These two will make 100 % and this will be called direct attainment.
Means 16 marks (that is 65 % of 25) Means 41 (that is 55 % of 75)
Now suppose your college has 60 students and all of them appeared in examinations then what will be the
scenario?
It means if 80% (48 students, that is 80% of 60) or more
that 80 % students score 16 or more marks then
attainment is said to 3.
It means if 80% (48 students, that is 80% of 60) or
more than 80% students score 41 or more marks
then attainment is said to 3.
It means if 70% (42 students, that is 70% of 60) students
score 16 or more marks then attainment is said to 2.
(>70<80)
It means if 70% (42 students, that is 70% of 60)
students score 41 or more marks then attainment is
said to 2. (>70<80)
It means if 60% (36 students, that is 60% of 60) students
score 16 or more marks then attainment is said to 1.
(>60<70)
It means if 60% (36 students, that is 60% of 60)
students score 41 or more marks then attainment is
said to 1. (>60<70)
It means if less than 60% (35 students) students score 16
or more marks then attainment is said to 0.
It means if less than 60% (35 students) students
score 41 or more marks then attainment is said to 0.
(3.2.2)
14
The most important Table no.: 5:
Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

15. Table no.: 6: How to set target level ? (Exclusively for
PCI pattern)
Set target level (Practical )
Internal (65%) External (55%)
Means 10 marks (that is 65 % of 15) Means 19 (that is 55 % of 35)
Now suppose your college has 60 students and all of them appeared in examinations then what will be the
scenario?
It means if 80% (48 students, that is 80% of 60) or more
that 80 % students score 10 or more marks then
attainment is said to 3.
It means if 80% (48 students, that is 80% of 60) or
more than 80% students score 19 or more marks
then attainment is said to 3.
It means if 70% (42 students, that is 70% of 60)
students score 10 or more marks then attainment is
said to 2. (>70<80)
It means if 70% (42 students, that is 70% of 60)
students score 19 or more marks then attainment is
said to 2. (>70<80)
It means if 60% (36 students, that is 60% of 60)
students score 10 or more marks then attainment is said
to 1. (>60<70)
It means if 60% (36 students, that is 60% of 60)
students score 19 or more marks then attainment is
said to 1. (>60<70)
It means if less than 60% (35 students) students score 10
or more marks then attainment is said to 0.
It means if less than 60% (35 students) students
score 19 or more marks then attainment is said to 0.
(3.2.2)
15
Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

16. Now here comes the crucial step of preparation
for calculation of attainment level using:
Direct assessment tools
(Take 80 %: refer table no 5 & 6)
Internal assessment tools
• Theory examination
• Practical examination
• Various continuous mode tools provided by PCI like
Quiz, Assignment, OBT, Seminar, GD and Field Trip
External assessment tools
• Theory examination
• Practical examination
Indirect assessment tools
(take only 20 %)
Various surveys/feedbacks like
• Parents
• Employers
• Exit
• Alumni
(3.3.1)
16Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

17. Below infographics will further
clarify the same.
17Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

18. 18Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

19. Final Calculation
Particulars PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
Direct Attainment
(A)
(All course 1st to 4th year)
2.8 2.1 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.5 2.3 2.8
80 % of Direct Attainment
(B)
2.3 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.6 2.0 1.7 1.7 2.0 1.9 2.2
Indirect Attainment
(C)
2.2 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.7 2.6 2.7
20% Indirect Attainment
(D)
0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Total Attainment Achieved
(B + D)
2.7 2.2 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.5 2.4 2.8
(3.3.2)
19Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

20. 20
Next part will be
NBA Criterion 3
full post mortem – Part II
The conclusion
Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

21. Our other insightful PPTs on NBA
https://www.slideshare.net/SnehalChakorkar/b-pharm-
course-outcomes-according-to-pci-syllabus-fir-nba
https://www.slideshare.net/SnehalChakorkar/aicte-
revised-exam-reform-policy
https://www.slideshare.net/SnehalChakorkar/framing-
of-question-paper-for-pci-syllabusaccording-to-
criterion-3
21Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar

22. 22Dr.Amit Gangwal & Ms Snehal Chakorkar