SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2011
www.PosterPresentations.com
Shot or Snot: Influencing Flu Vaccination Rates
Seasonal Influenza….
• Contagious respiratory illness
• Caused from respiratory droplets produced by a host
• Droplets produced from coughing, sneezing, talking
• Can be directly or indirectly transmitted to another person
• Symptoms
• Mild to severe
• Sore throat, nasal congestion, fever, systemic body aches,
weakness, and even death
• Symptoms can last two weeks or longer
• Can lead to other medical complications
How Does The Vaccination Work:
• The flu vaccine makes the body produce antibodies about
two weeks after the vaccination. These antibodies will help
protect the body from the viruses that were included in the
vaccine.
• Research is done to help predict which influenza viruses
may be most common during the upcoming season.
• These strands are then included in the vaccine.
Who Should Get The Vaccination?
• Anyone above the age of 6 months
• Especially those above the age of 50 or people with
immunosuppression
• Health–care personnel
• People with certain medical conditions, including asthma,
chronic lung disease, and diabetes
• Is the vaccine effective?
• Reduces the odds of getting the fly by 70-90% (Center for
Disease Control and Prevention, 2014)
• Side effects of vaccine:
• Less severe than the flu
• Range of symptoms
• Soreness where shot was injected, body aches, runny nose,
headache, vomiting, and low grade fever
• These are all short lived
PROCEDURE
PART 1:
• Continue to explore ways to increase flu vaccination rates.
The effect of testimonies vs. statistics stood out to us, and this
is where our current research is focused.
• Explore the literature: studies that used narrative information
(case studies, anecdotes).
PART 2:
• Design a study to be conducted at The University of
Minnesota.
PART 3:
• Partner with Mount Saint Mary College Heath Services in the
advertising campaign for the 2014-2015 flu vaccine season.
• then included in the vaccine
PART 2:
• We collaborated with Dr. Stellmack at University of Minnesota (UMN) to design a study to see if there was an influencing factor between seeing a sick person
(who could have the flu) or someone getting a shot in the arm (preventing them from getting the flu)
• Negative (shot, pain) now would mean no suffering from the flu later
• No pain now (don’t get the shot) could mean suffering in the future
• Identical posters, just change in the pictures
• Reason for choosing UMN: larger sample size compared to MSMC!
• Flyers were handed out during class and submitted to the professor in a folder. Study was anonymous.
PART 3:
• Partnered with Health Services here at MSMC to design a poster for the flu season
• We incorporated a narrative story into this year’s poster. We are looking to see if this narrative is powerful in compelling more students to get the flu vaccine.
METHODS
PART 1: Exploring the Literature
One study that peaked our interest was one carried out on vaccinating men who
were at risk for hepatitis B (Wit et al. 2008)
• Half the men read narrative stories while the other half received statistical
evidence
• The study showed that narrative evidence that supports a health risk
assertion can be an effective strategy to increase individuals perception of
their personal health risk, AND promote protecting behavior, receiving a
vaccination
• Narrative risk perfection – 3.45
• Statistical Risk Perception – 2.89
Continued research revealed similar findings, that narrative information can
sway us more to action that statistical evidence alone
One reason for low vaccination rates for influenza is people don’t think it’s a
serious illness. (Shahrabani et al. 2009)
• One study showed that when patients were presented with narrative
communication, they had a higher risk perception of influenza compared to
that of the no message condition (Prati et al. 2012)
Another study looked at promoting positive health behavior with narrative
information (Lemal et al. 2010)
• Those who were presented with narrative messages were “two to four times
more likely to have performed most of the recommended behaviors at follow
up” compared to those in the control group
One study looked at the effect of a fictitious character on television getting
cervical cancer, later dying off the show. They performed a retrospective
analysis on cervical screenings, and found an increase of up to 14,000 smears
the year following the airing of the show, with a substantial increase in weeks
following the soap opera story line (Howe et al. 2002)
A systematic review found that first person narrative was twice as likely to
produce an effect compared to third person narratives (Winterbottom et al.
2008)
PART 2: University of Minnesota Flu Survey
293 surveyed students did NOT get the flu vaccine last year
213 surveyed students DID get the flu vaccine last year
How will picture influence likelihood of getting vaccine?
• Shot picture – 3.02
• Sick picture – 3.06
• Higher number, higher likelihood, difference not significant
Part 3: MSMC Flu Flyer
• Pending results
RESULTS
DISCUSSION/FUTURE RESEARCH
There was plenty of literature on the topic of testimonials, case studies, and
personal anecdotes and their effect on decision making. The majority of
studies showed that these testimonies aided in making a decision, more so
than statistics and control groups with no intervention. This may be due to
the fact that these “stories” are vivid and grab our attention more than just
topic specific information. Additionally, these stories normally have
characters that we can relate to (Kreuter et al. 2011).
Our study at UMN proved to not have any real effect. We were under the
impression that when students were presented with the pictures of the shot,
this would decrease their intention to get vaccinated. On the other hand, we
thought when students were shown the “sick” students, this would move
them to get the flu shot. The end results were not significant, with only a
slight difference between groups.
Our current research at MSMC is underway. This year we are studying
whether the personal testimony on flyers will increase the flu vaccine rate
here on campus among residential freshman. Will will gather this data and
compare it with next year’s study.
We are anticipating partnering with heath services again next flu season
(2015-2016) and will design the posters to display statistical information.
This will allow us to see if testimonials do indeed sway decision making.
Further research is also needed to find out why this may be. Why does
narrative information move us to make a decision, and why does statistical
information not compare? This research will most likely need to be done in
the area of psychology and decision making.
SELECTED REFERENCES
Wit, J., Das, E., Vet, R. (2008). What works best: Objective statistics or a personal testimonial?
As assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk
perception. Health Psychology, 27(1), 110-115.
Shahrabani, S. (2009). Factors affecting nurses’ decision to get the flu vaccine. Eur J Health
Econ, 10, 227-231
Lemal, M., & Van den Bulck, J. (2010). Testing the effectiveness of skin cancer narrative in
promoting positive health behavior: A pilot study. Preventative Medicine, 51, 178-181
Howe, A., Owen-Smith, V., Richardson, J. (2002). The impact of a television soap opera on the
NHS cervical screening programme in the north west of england. Journal of Public Health
Medicine, 24(4), 299-304
Winterbottom, A., Bekker, H., Conner, M, Mooney, A. (2008). Does narrative information bias
individual’s decision making? A systemativ review. Social Science & Medicine, 67, 2079-2088
Kreuter, M., Holmes, K., Alcaraz, K., Kalesan, B., Rath, S., Richet, M., . . . Clark, E. (2010).
Compaing narrative and informational videos to increase mammography in low-income african
american women. National Institute of Health, 81
Prati, G., Pietrantoni, L., Zani, B. (2012). Influenza vaccination: The persuasiveness of
messages among people aged 65 years and older. Health Communication, 27, 413-420
THANKS AND CONTACT
I would like to thank Dr. Kalkstein for giving me the opportunity to
perform this research. Also, many thanks to Dr. Moran for being
understanding and flexible with my back injury! Thank you to
Health Services, especially Ms. Bischof in collaborating with
designing the flu flyers. - Sean
Contact:
• Email – sdon2910@my.msmc.edu
• Phone – 845-742-0969
Mount Saint Mary College
Sean D’Onofrio and Dr. Yasmine Kalkstein
GET THE SHOT
NOT THE FLU
“Felt like I was hit by a car…”
“Getting the flu was the worst! I’ve never been so sick before in
my life. I had the highest fever of all time, and my body felt like I
was hit by a car. Being a college student didn’t help either. I was
too sick to go to class or to do any work, that I fell really far behind
in class. I ended up failing one science class, and got a few C’s in
others. I never want to get the flu again. I used to never get the
vaccination, but I know now that the best way to prevent myself
from getting the flu is to get the flu vaccination.”
FLU SEASON IS
APPROACHING
FAST!
ONLY $15
GET IT AT HEALTH
SERVICES!!!
NO APPOINTMENT
NECESSARY
GET THE SHOT
NOT THE FLU!
HEALTH SERVICES
Location: Guzman Hall
Hours:
Mon/Wed – 8:30-4:30
Tue/Thur – 8:30-5:00
Fri – 8:30-3:00
Phone: 845-569- 3152
LEFT: The two flyers that were
given to UMN students. Half of
the students received on with
adults getting an injection, the
other half received one with
adults who appeared sick.
RIGHT: This is the flyer we
designed for MSMC Health
Services. There are four other
flyers that have different pictures
and different narrative stories.
It’s time to get your flu vaccine!
We are conducting this research to gather information about how many people
on campus will get the flu vaccination this year.
How likely are you to get the flu vaccine during the upcoming flu season (fall,
2014 or spring, 2015), either on campus or elsewhere?
(Circle one of the following numbers:)
1 2 3 4 5
Definitely Unlikely Equally likely Likely Definitely
will not and unlikely will
Did you get a flu vaccine during the last flu season (either in fall, 2013 or spring,
2014)?
(Circle one:)
YES NO
It’s time to get your flu vaccine!
We are conducting this research to gather information about how many people
on campus will get the flu vaccination this year.
How likely are you to get the flu vaccine during the upcoming flu season (fall,
2014 or spring, 2015), either on campus or elsewhere?
(Circle one of the following numbers:)
1 2 3 4 5
Definitely Unlikely Equally likely Likely Definitely
will not and unlikely will
Did you get a flu vaccine during the last flu season (either in fall, 2013 or spring,
2014)?
(Circle one:)
YES NO

More Related Content

What's hot

DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY
DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGYDESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY
DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGYNarayanan Nambu
 
Descriptive study of Epidemiology PSM
Descriptive study of Epidemiology PSMDescriptive study of Epidemiology PSM
Descriptive study of Epidemiology PSMDhanushreeG1
 
Blue Ribbon Project Outline 2 Marym Lakhani
Blue Ribbon Project Outline 2 Marym LakhaniBlue Ribbon Project Outline 2 Marym Lakhani
Blue Ribbon Project Outline 2 Marym LakhaniMarym lakhani
 
Childhood immunisation: acceptance and advocacy
Childhood immunisation: acceptance and advocacyChildhood immunisation: acceptance and advocacy
Childhood immunisation: acceptance and advocacyJulie Leask
 
Outbreak of disease ---www
Outbreak of disease  ---wwwOutbreak of disease  ---www
Outbreak of disease ---wwwjinhezys
 
Epidemiology Lectures for UG
Epidemiology Lectures for UGEpidemiology Lectures for UG
Epidemiology Lectures for UGamitakashyap1
 
An Assessment of Adult Perceptions of Flu Illness and Vaccine Knowledge
An Assessment of Adult Perceptions of Flu Illness and Vaccine KnowledgeAn Assessment of Adult Perceptions of Flu Illness and Vaccine Knowledge
An Assessment of Adult Perceptions of Flu Illness and Vaccine KnowledgeJonna (Jodi) Lloyd
 
Barriers to pediatric TB diagnosis 2015
Barriers to pediatric TB diagnosis 2015Barriers to pediatric TB diagnosis 2015
Barriers to pediatric TB diagnosis 2015Katherine Reifler
 
Criteria for causal association
Criteria for causal associationCriteria for causal association
Criteria for causal associationdrkaushikp
 
Association and Causation
Association and CausationAssociation and Causation
Association and CausationRizwan S A
 
Descriptive epidemiology
Descriptive epidemiologyDescriptive epidemiology
Descriptive epidemiologyRizwan S A
 
Inv.epidemics
Inv.epidemicsInv.epidemics
Inv.epidemicsNc Das
 
Power Point H1 N1
Power Point H1 N1Power Point H1 N1
Power Point H1 N1ATuuk107
 
The prevalence of missed opportunities for immunization among
The prevalence of missed opportunities for immunization amongThe prevalence of missed opportunities for immunization among
The prevalence of missed opportunities for immunization amongAlexander Decker
 
Capstone PPT Koranda 2014 1115AM
Capstone PPT Koranda 2014 1115AMCapstone PPT Koranda 2014 1115AM
Capstone PPT Koranda 2014 1115AMLindsay Coffman
 

What's hot (20)

EPIDEMIOLOGY DETAILED
EPIDEMIOLOGY DETAILEDEPIDEMIOLOGY DETAILED
EPIDEMIOLOGY DETAILED
 
Screening for Diseases
Screening for DiseasesScreening for Diseases
Screening for Diseases
 
DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY
DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGYDESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY
DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY
 
Descriptive study of Epidemiology PSM
Descriptive study of Epidemiology PSMDescriptive study of Epidemiology PSM
Descriptive study of Epidemiology PSM
 
Blue Ribbon Project Outline 2 Marym Lakhani
Blue Ribbon Project Outline 2 Marym LakhaniBlue Ribbon Project Outline 2 Marym Lakhani
Blue Ribbon Project Outline 2 Marym Lakhani
 
Childhood immunisation: acceptance and advocacy
Childhood immunisation: acceptance and advocacyChildhood immunisation: acceptance and advocacy
Childhood immunisation: acceptance and advocacy
 
H0506034045
H0506034045H0506034045
H0506034045
 
Outbreak of disease ---www
Outbreak of disease  ---wwwOutbreak of disease  ---www
Outbreak of disease ---www
 
Epidemiology Lectures for UG
Epidemiology Lectures for UGEpidemiology Lectures for UG
Epidemiology Lectures for UG
 
An Assessment of Adult Perceptions of Flu Illness and Vaccine Knowledge
An Assessment of Adult Perceptions of Flu Illness and Vaccine KnowledgeAn Assessment of Adult Perceptions of Flu Illness and Vaccine Knowledge
An Assessment of Adult Perceptions of Flu Illness and Vaccine Knowledge
 
Barriers to pediatric TB diagnosis 2015
Barriers to pediatric TB diagnosis 2015Barriers to pediatric TB diagnosis 2015
Barriers to pediatric TB diagnosis 2015
 
Criteria for causal association
Criteria for causal associationCriteria for causal association
Criteria for causal association
 
EBQM poster
EBQM posterEBQM poster
EBQM poster
 
Association and Causation
Association and CausationAssociation and Causation
Association and Causation
 
Descriptive epidemiology
Descriptive epidemiologyDescriptive epidemiology
Descriptive epidemiology
 
Inv.epidemics
Inv.epidemicsInv.epidemics
Inv.epidemics
 
Power Point H1 N1
Power Point H1 N1Power Point H1 N1
Power Point H1 N1
 
Vaccines - Stokley
Vaccines - StokleyVaccines - Stokley
Vaccines - Stokley
 
The prevalence of missed opportunities for immunization among
The prevalence of missed opportunities for immunization amongThe prevalence of missed opportunities for immunization among
The prevalence of missed opportunities for immunization among
 
Capstone PPT Koranda 2014 1115AM
Capstone PPT Koranda 2014 1115AMCapstone PPT Koranda 2014 1115AM
Capstone PPT Koranda 2014 1115AM
 

Viewers also liked

Narrative And Descriptive Writing Ppt
Narrative And Descriptive Writing PptNarrative And Descriptive Writing Ppt
Narrative And Descriptive Writing PptBMS
 
Descriptive essay powerpoint
Descriptive essay powerpointDescriptive essay powerpoint
Descriptive essay powerpointphricee
 
English descriptive writing
English descriptive writingEnglish descriptive writing
English descriptive writingKate Simmons
 
Descriptive writing 1
Descriptive writing 1Descriptive writing 1
Descriptive writing 1mzickefoose2
 
Introduction to descriptive writing
Introduction to descriptive writingIntroduction to descriptive writing
Introduction to descriptive writingenglishteacher-tnt
 
PowerPoint on Narrative
PowerPoint on NarrativePowerPoint on Narrative
PowerPoint on NarrativeNatalie
 

Viewers also liked (7)

Narrative And Descriptive Writing Ppt
Narrative And Descriptive Writing PptNarrative And Descriptive Writing Ppt
Narrative And Descriptive Writing Ppt
 
Descriptive essay powerpoint
Descriptive essay powerpointDescriptive essay powerpoint
Descriptive essay powerpoint
 
Descriptive Essay Writing
Descriptive Essay WritingDescriptive Essay Writing
Descriptive Essay Writing
 
English descriptive writing
English descriptive writingEnglish descriptive writing
English descriptive writing
 
Descriptive writing 1
Descriptive writing 1Descriptive writing 1
Descriptive writing 1
 
Introduction to descriptive writing
Introduction to descriptive writingIntroduction to descriptive writing
Introduction to descriptive writing
 
PowerPoint on Narrative
PowerPoint on NarrativePowerPoint on Narrative
PowerPoint on Narrative
 

Similar to SURE poster revised

The epidemic of misinformation about vaccines
The epidemic of misinformation about vaccinesThe epidemic of misinformation about vaccines
The epidemic of misinformation about vaccinesCILIP
 
Epidemiology Course Summary
Epidemiology Course SummaryEpidemiology Course Summary
Epidemiology Course SummaryRikki Wright
 
Personal Statement Of Epidemiology
Personal Statement Of EpidemiologyPersonal Statement Of Epidemiology
Personal Statement Of EpidemiologyStephanie Roberts
 
Running head UNIT 8 PROJECT1UNIT 8 PROJECT2Unit 8 Proj.docx
Running head  UNIT 8 PROJECT1UNIT 8 PROJECT2Unit 8 Proj.docxRunning head  UNIT 8 PROJECT1UNIT 8 PROJECT2Unit 8 Proj.docx
Running head UNIT 8 PROJECT1UNIT 8 PROJECT2Unit 8 Proj.docxjoellemurphey
 
Define Epidemiology Essay
Define Epidemiology EssayDefine Epidemiology Essay
Define Epidemiology EssayPatty Buckley
 
4PICOT STATEMENTPICOT Statement and Literatur.docx
4PICOT STATEMENTPICOT Statement and Literatur.docx4PICOT STATEMENTPICOT Statement and Literatur.docx
4PICOT STATEMENTPICOT Statement and Literatur.docxtroutmanboris
 
Running head RESEARCH PAPER15RESEARCH PAPERDo.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER15RESEARCH PAPERDo.docxRunning head RESEARCH PAPER15RESEARCH PAPERDo.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER15RESEARCH PAPERDo.docxtoltonkendal
 
XNN001 Introductory epidemiological concepts - Study design
XNN001 Introductory epidemiological concepts - Study designXNN001 Introductory epidemiological concepts - Study design
XNN001 Introductory epidemiological concepts - Study designramseyr
 
ConclusionAs we have stated in this paper earlier, we have seen .docx
ConclusionAs we have stated in this paper earlier, we have seen .docxConclusionAs we have stated in this paper earlier, we have seen .docx
ConclusionAs we have stated in this paper earlier, we have seen .docxdonnajames55
 
Nur 405 Epidemiology Paper
Nur 405 Epidemiology PaperNur 405 Epidemiology Paper
Nur 405 Epidemiology PaperDenise Enriquez
 
Introduction to epidemiology
Introduction to epidemiologyIntroduction to epidemiology
Introduction to epidemiologymlogaraj
 

Similar to SURE poster revised (13)

Epidemiology Essay
Epidemiology EssayEpidemiology Essay
Epidemiology Essay
 
The epidemic of misinformation about vaccines
The epidemic of misinformation about vaccinesThe epidemic of misinformation about vaccines
The epidemic of misinformation about vaccines
 
Epidemiology Course Summary
Epidemiology Course SummaryEpidemiology Course Summary
Epidemiology Course Summary
 
Personal Statement Of Epidemiology
Personal Statement Of EpidemiologyPersonal Statement Of Epidemiology
Personal Statement Of Epidemiology
 
Running head UNIT 8 PROJECT1UNIT 8 PROJECT2Unit 8 Proj.docx
Running head  UNIT 8 PROJECT1UNIT 8 PROJECT2Unit 8 Proj.docxRunning head  UNIT 8 PROJECT1UNIT 8 PROJECT2Unit 8 Proj.docx
Running head UNIT 8 PROJECT1UNIT 8 PROJECT2Unit 8 Proj.docx
 
Lin Final Version - Final
Lin Final Version - FinalLin Final Version - Final
Lin Final Version - Final
 
Define Epidemiology Essay
Define Epidemiology EssayDefine Epidemiology Essay
Define Epidemiology Essay
 
4PICOT STATEMENTPICOT Statement and Literatur.docx
4PICOT STATEMENTPICOT Statement and Literatur.docx4PICOT STATEMENTPICOT Statement and Literatur.docx
4PICOT STATEMENTPICOT Statement and Literatur.docx
 
Running head RESEARCH PAPER15RESEARCH PAPERDo.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER15RESEARCH PAPERDo.docxRunning head RESEARCH PAPER15RESEARCH PAPERDo.docx
Running head RESEARCH PAPER15RESEARCH PAPERDo.docx
 
XNN001 Introductory epidemiological concepts - Study design
XNN001 Introductory epidemiological concepts - Study designXNN001 Introductory epidemiological concepts - Study design
XNN001 Introductory epidemiological concepts - Study design
 
ConclusionAs we have stated in this paper earlier, we have seen .docx
ConclusionAs we have stated in this paper earlier, we have seen .docxConclusionAs we have stated in this paper earlier, we have seen .docx
ConclusionAs we have stated in this paper earlier, we have seen .docx
 
Nur 405 Epidemiology Paper
Nur 405 Epidemiology PaperNur 405 Epidemiology Paper
Nur 405 Epidemiology Paper
 
Introduction to epidemiology
Introduction to epidemiologyIntroduction to epidemiology
Introduction to epidemiology
 

SURE poster revised

  • 1. RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2011 www.PosterPresentations.com Shot or Snot: Influencing Flu Vaccination Rates Seasonal Influenza…. • Contagious respiratory illness • Caused from respiratory droplets produced by a host • Droplets produced from coughing, sneezing, talking • Can be directly or indirectly transmitted to another person • Symptoms • Mild to severe • Sore throat, nasal congestion, fever, systemic body aches, weakness, and even death • Symptoms can last two weeks or longer • Can lead to other medical complications How Does The Vaccination Work: • The flu vaccine makes the body produce antibodies about two weeks after the vaccination. These antibodies will help protect the body from the viruses that were included in the vaccine. • Research is done to help predict which influenza viruses may be most common during the upcoming season. • These strands are then included in the vaccine. Who Should Get The Vaccination? • Anyone above the age of 6 months • Especially those above the age of 50 or people with immunosuppression • Health–care personnel • People with certain medical conditions, including asthma, chronic lung disease, and diabetes • Is the vaccine effective? • Reduces the odds of getting the fly by 70-90% (Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014) • Side effects of vaccine: • Less severe than the flu • Range of symptoms • Soreness where shot was injected, body aches, runny nose, headache, vomiting, and low grade fever • These are all short lived PROCEDURE PART 1: • Continue to explore ways to increase flu vaccination rates. The effect of testimonies vs. statistics stood out to us, and this is where our current research is focused. • Explore the literature: studies that used narrative information (case studies, anecdotes). PART 2: • Design a study to be conducted at The University of Minnesota. PART 3: • Partner with Mount Saint Mary College Heath Services in the advertising campaign for the 2014-2015 flu vaccine season. • then included in the vaccine PART 2: • We collaborated with Dr. Stellmack at University of Minnesota (UMN) to design a study to see if there was an influencing factor between seeing a sick person (who could have the flu) or someone getting a shot in the arm (preventing them from getting the flu) • Negative (shot, pain) now would mean no suffering from the flu later • No pain now (don’t get the shot) could mean suffering in the future • Identical posters, just change in the pictures • Reason for choosing UMN: larger sample size compared to MSMC! • Flyers were handed out during class and submitted to the professor in a folder. Study was anonymous. PART 3: • Partnered with Health Services here at MSMC to design a poster for the flu season • We incorporated a narrative story into this year’s poster. We are looking to see if this narrative is powerful in compelling more students to get the flu vaccine. METHODS PART 1: Exploring the Literature One study that peaked our interest was one carried out on vaccinating men who were at risk for hepatitis B (Wit et al. 2008) • Half the men read narrative stories while the other half received statistical evidence • The study showed that narrative evidence that supports a health risk assertion can be an effective strategy to increase individuals perception of their personal health risk, AND promote protecting behavior, receiving a vaccination • Narrative risk perfection – 3.45 • Statistical Risk Perception – 2.89 Continued research revealed similar findings, that narrative information can sway us more to action that statistical evidence alone One reason for low vaccination rates for influenza is people don’t think it’s a serious illness. (Shahrabani et al. 2009) • One study showed that when patients were presented with narrative communication, they had a higher risk perception of influenza compared to that of the no message condition (Prati et al. 2012) Another study looked at promoting positive health behavior with narrative information (Lemal et al. 2010) • Those who were presented with narrative messages were “two to four times more likely to have performed most of the recommended behaviors at follow up” compared to those in the control group One study looked at the effect of a fictitious character on television getting cervical cancer, later dying off the show. They performed a retrospective analysis on cervical screenings, and found an increase of up to 14,000 smears the year following the airing of the show, with a substantial increase in weeks following the soap opera story line (Howe et al. 2002) A systematic review found that first person narrative was twice as likely to produce an effect compared to third person narratives (Winterbottom et al. 2008) PART 2: University of Minnesota Flu Survey 293 surveyed students did NOT get the flu vaccine last year 213 surveyed students DID get the flu vaccine last year How will picture influence likelihood of getting vaccine? • Shot picture – 3.02 • Sick picture – 3.06 • Higher number, higher likelihood, difference not significant Part 3: MSMC Flu Flyer • Pending results RESULTS DISCUSSION/FUTURE RESEARCH There was plenty of literature on the topic of testimonials, case studies, and personal anecdotes and their effect on decision making. The majority of studies showed that these testimonies aided in making a decision, more so than statistics and control groups with no intervention. This may be due to the fact that these “stories” are vivid and grab our attention more than just topic specific information. Additionally, these stories normally have characters that we can relate to (Kreuter et al. 2011). Our study at UMN proved to not have any real effect. We were under the impression that when students were presented with the pictures of the shot, this would decrease their intention to get vaccinated. On the other hand, we thought when students were shown the “sick” students, this would move them to get the flu shot. The end results were not significant, with only a slight difference between groups. Our current research at MSMC is underway. This year we are studying whether the personal testimony on flyers will increase the flu vaccine rate here on campus among residential freshman. Will will gather this data and compare it with next year’s study. We are anticipating partnering with heath services again next flu season (2015-2016) and will design the posters to display statistical information. This will allow us to see if testimonials do indeed sway decision making. Further research is also needed to find out why this may be. Why does narrative information move us to make a decision, and why does statistical information not compare? This research will most likely need to be done in the area of psychology and decision making. SELECTED REFERENCES Wit, J., Das, E., Vet, R. (2008). What works best: Objective statistics or a personal testimonial? As assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk perception. Health Psychology, 27(1), 110-115. Shahrabani, S. (2009). Factors affecting nurses’ decision to get the flu vaccine. Eur J Health Econ, 10, 227-231 Lemal, M., & Van den Bulck, J. (2010). Testing the effectiveness of skin cancer narrative in promoting positive health behavior: A pilot study. Preventative Medicine, 51, 178-181 Howe, A., Owen-Smith, V., Richardson, J. (2002). The impact of a television soap opera on the NHS cervical screening programme in the north west of england. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 24(4), 299-304 Winterbottom, A., Bekker, H., Conner, M, Mooney, A. (2008). Does narrative information bias individual’s decision making? A systemativ review. Social Science & Medicine, 67, 2079-2088 Kreuter, M., Holmes, K., Alcaraz, K., Kalesan, B., Rath, S., Richet, M., . . . Clark, E. (2010). Compaing narrative and informational videos to increase mammography in low-income african american women. National Institute of Health, 81 Prati, G., Pietrantoni, L., Zani, B. (2012). Influenza vaccination: The persuasiveness of messages among people aged 65 years and older. Health Communication, 27, 413-420 THANKS AND CONTACT I would like to thank Dr. Kalkstein for giving me the opportunity to perform this research. Also, many thanks to Dr. Moran for being understanding and flexible with my back injury! Thank you to Health Services, especially Ms. Bischof in collaborating with designing the flu flyers. - Sean Contact: • Email – sdon2910@my.msmc.edu • Phone – 845-742-0969 Mount Saint Mary College Sean D’Onofrio and Dr. Yasmine Kalkstein GET THE SHOT NOT THE FLU “Felt like I was hit by a car…” “Getting the flu was the worst! I’ve never been so sick before in my life. I had the highest fever of all time, and my body felt like I was hit by a car. Being a college student didn’t help either. I was too sick to go to class or to do any work, that I fell really far behind in class. I ended up failing one science class, and got a few C’s in others. I never want to get the flu again. I used to never get the vaccination, but I know now that the best way to prevent myself from getting the flu is to get the flu vaccination.” FLU SEASON IS APPROACHING FAST! ONLY $15 GET IT AT HEALTH SERVICES!!! NO APPOINTMENT NECESSARY GET THE SHOT NOT THE FLU! HEALTH SERVICES Location: Guzman Hall Hours: Mon/Wed – 8:30-4:30 Tue/Thur – 8:30-5:00 Fri – 8:30-3:00 Phone: 845-569- 3152 LEFT: The two flyers that were given to UMN students. Half of the students received on with adults getting an injection, the other half received one with adults who appeared sick. RIGHT: This is the flyer we designed for MSMC Health Services. There are four other flyers that have different pictures and different narrative stories. It’s time to get your flu vaccine! We are conducting this research to gather information about how many people on campus will get the flu vaccination this year. How likely are you to get the flu vaccine during the upcoming flu season (fall, 2014 or spring, 2015), either on campus or elsewhere? (Circle one of the following numbers:) 1 2 3 4 5 Definitely Unlikely Equally likely Likely Definitely will not and unlikely will Did you get a flu vaccine during the last flu season (either in fall, 2013 or spring, 2014)? (Circle one:) YES NO It’s time to get your flu vaccine! We are conducting this research to gather information about how many people on campus will get the flu vaccination this year. How likely are you to get the flu vaccine during the upcoming flu season (fall, 2014 or spring, 2015), either on campus or elsewhere? (Circle one of the following numbers:) 1 2 3 4 5 Definitely Unlikely Equally likely Likely Definitely will not and unlikely will Did you get a flu vaccine during the last flu season (either in fall, 2013 or spring, 2014)? (Circle one:) YES NO