2. It’s fantastic!
 Eye catching and conventional.
 Good designs.
 Looks good: layout, images, colour, fonts suit the
genre and look conventional.
 Consistent colour scheme and house style.


3. Yes
No
It's okay

4. Clear and easy to use.
 Amazing!
 I like that they are san serif and conventional.
 Eye catching
 Appealing to read
 Conventional
 Cover lines stand out well.


5. Conventional.
 Too much yellow.
 Eye catching and suits the magazine.
 The colours are conventional and make everything
look appealing.
 Conventional and consistent.
 The colours are a very good feature of the
magazine.


6. 




They look good and conventional. Very well
planned.
Conventional
Suits the genre.
They look good. Each page has different images
and appear conventional.
The images are good, very conventional.

7. 





The colours, fonts and images all look
conventional.
Most of it is conventional, especially the font.
Conventional font, colours and images.
Layout, images, colours all conventional.
Consistent conventional colour scheme. The
images are very conventional and effective.
The images, the colour scheme and the layout.

8. 


Front cover – Cover stories, cluttered but effective,
eye catching, images, masthead – conventional.
Contents page – Good layout, images, fonts and
colours are conventional.
Double page – Good layout, conventional, good
image and colour scheme

9. 

Contents page – Layout
Double page – Empty space, font doesn’t stand
out, not much yellow – house style.

10. More images.
 Less writing.
 Less over crowding.
 Background or the header on the double age
spread.
 Image positions.
 Fill some of the space.
 Yellow on the double page spread.
