SlideShare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
SlideShare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.
Successfully reported this slideshow.
Activate your 14 day free trial to unlock unlimited reading.
Research Evaluation Panel Opening - Erin McKiernan - OpenCon 2016
Research Evaluation Panel Opening - Erin McKiernan - OpenCon 2016
1.
Research Evaluation:
Let’s Make ‘Open’ Count!
2.
“I’m all for open scholarship…
but…”
What we often hear from researchers:
3.
Image: Why Open Research? CC BY http://whyopenresearch.org/gallery
“…I also want a
promotion and
tenure”
4.
Researchers often cite concerns
about hiring, promotion, and tenure
evaluations as a top reason they do
not share their work.
5.
The case of my disappearing PeerJ paper
https://peerj.com/articles/57/
6.
My paper disappeared because of
impact factor worship
Image: Why Open Research? CC BY http://whyopenresearch.org/gallery
7.
If we want things to change, we have
to change the incentives.
Image: opensource.com via Flickr, CC BY SA https://www.flickr.com/photos/opensourceway/5161094177
8.
How should we evaluate research?
How can we reward ‘open’?
Image: Mark Moz via Flickr, CC BY https://www.flickr.com/photos/106574022@N04/10797544894
9.
It starts by knowing what we’re doing
right and wrong…
10.
How you can help
http://www.opencon2016.org/research_evaluation
Sign up to receive updates
rpt-project@sfu.ca
More info: http://publishing.sfu.ca/7297-review-promotion-tenure-project/
Thanks to OSF!
Send us the documents!