2. HISTORY: Escherich’s great legacy to science
Escherich 1st described Bacterium coli commune in 1885
Theodore Escherich (1857– 1911)
Isolated from infant’s stool and
chose the designation Bacterium coli
commune (the common colon
bacterium)
Renamed in his honour as
Escherichia coli in 1958 Judicial
Commission: “Conservation of the
Enterobacteriacea, ...”
3. Classification:
Genus : Escherichia
Family: Enterobacteriaceae
Order: Enterobacteriales
Class: Gammaproteobacteria
Phylum: Proteobacteria
Kingdom: Eubacteria
(Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 1993)
Gram-negative, rod-shaped, non-sporulating
Facultative anaerobes of human & animal
intestine
2.0-6.0 μm long & 1.1μm in diameter
Motile with peritrichous flagella
(Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 1993)
4. Colloquial laboratory workhorse
Biology’s premier model organism
•More known about this bacterium,
esp. K-12, than any other organism
• Escherichia coli- Most thoroughly understood
organism on earth
Much of our knowledge of intermediary
metabolism, genetic recombination, DNA
replication, RNA transcription, and protein
synthesis, sorting…………… carried out in
E. coli and still carrying on………
5. The Good…..+
• Colonizes neonates shortly
after birth and remain with
us throughout life….
– Mostly nonpathogenic
– Coexisting in harmony
– Symbiotic relationship
– Synthesize cofactors
– Contribute to colonization
resistance against pathogenic
organisms
– Produces Vit. B12 & K
5
Most abundant facultative anaerobe present in the
intestine of humans and many other endothermic species
6. Escherichia coli : The enemy within
Diarrheal illness- 2nd leading cause of U5MR, much
high in Africa and S. Asia (WHO, 2012); (Liu et al., 2012)
Rotavirus & E. coli- two most common etiological
agents of diarrhoea in developing countries (WHO, 2009)
Globally, DEC are responsible for ≈ 300,000-500,000
U5MR; accounting around 33% of total infant’s death
(Fleckenstein et al., 2010)
Probiotic and pathogen!
7. More than humble resident of the gut ……….
The quintessential pleuripotential pathogen...
• Wide variety of illnesses in array
of species
• Target organs: GIT, meninges,
kidneys ……
• Outcomes:
– Diarrhea
– Dysentery
– Cholecystitis, UTI
– Peritonitis
– Pyelonephritis
– meningitis, HUS….
8. Breaking the Barrier Between
Commensalism and Pathogenicity
I am not a
cucumber
« commensal » E. coli can be also very bad guy… pathogenic to MDR
9. High number of different pathotypes
of E. coli due to genome plasticity
PATHOTYPES: A group of strains of a single species that cause a
common disease using a common set of virulence factors (Kaper et. al., 2004)
• GIT pathogens: Six categories
– enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC)
– enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC)
– enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC)
– enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC)
– enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC)
– diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC)
• Extraintestinal infections - ExPEC
• UTIs: Uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC).
• Meningitis & sepsis: meningitis-associated
E. coli (MNEC).
(Croxen & Finlay, 2010, Nat Rev Microbiol)
10. Patho-adaptive mutations
……More outbreaks….
• The core E. coli genome – only 20% of its avg. genome size (Rasko et al., 2008)
• More subtle patho-adaptive mutations-disease/Outbreak
• 2011: E. coli outbreak in Germany- >4,000 cases, 908 cases of HUS & >50
deaths, due to fenugreek seeds contaminated with the enteroaggregative
EHEC strain O104:H4 that produced Shiga toxins, imported from Egypt
(BFR, 2012)
Only 20% of the genome of E. coli (the 'core' genome) is highly conserved between strains
11. Jeckel and Hyde species…… can both coexist
peacefully with its host & cause devastating illness
HGT
What is responsible for this paradox?
-Conjugation
-Transformation
-Transduction
Mobile genetic elements
-Transposons
-Insertion sequences
-Bacteriophages & plasmids
New traits
Adaptation
Fitness to bacteria
Virulence factors in humans
• Particular virulence gene combinations specific pathotypes of E. coli
• Each pathotype has a propensity to cause a limited variety of clinical syndromes
12. Complex relationships among pathotypes
Share many virulence factors, single
clones can cause both meningitis and
urinary tract infections (Russo and Johnson,
2000)
Among the UPEC, some strains share
with diffuse adhering E. coli (DAEC)
DAEC strains recovered from individuals
with both urinary tract infections (UTIs) and
diarrhea (Germani et al., 1997)
There are also reports of Stx producing
E. coli (STEC) strains causing UTI (Tarr et
al., 1996) and other extraintestinal
infections.
13. An emerging hybrid E. coli pathotype
+
EAEC
= EHEC O104:H4
Stx2 EaggEC Virulence plasmid
Colonization of the gut
Toxin production
Hemolytic-uremic
syndrome
16. Glimpse of pathogenesis
Pathotype Host(s) Site Disease(S) Resevoir(S)/sources Rx Adhesion Genetic Identifiers
(Croxen et. al., 2013)
17. EPEC: An introduction
• 1st pathotype of E. coli proved to be
associated with diarrhea- outbreak in a
pediatric nursery in London (UK)
by John Bray & colleagues, 1945
• Term ‘EPEC’: Neter et. al.,1955- linked
to childhood diarrhoea
• Serious threat to children < 2 years
• LEE +ve
– “typical” EPEC= +ve for E. coli
adherence factor plasmid (pEAF) and bfp
gene.
• Reservoir : Human only
– “atypical” EPEC: Highly heterogeneous
group, -ve for pEAF and bfp gene. Both
in human and animals
(Nataro and Kaper, 1998) Attaching and effacing (A/E) pathogens
18. EPEC: Pathogenesis
Adherence: Bundle forming pili (bfp);
tether individual bacteria localized
adherence (LA)
Signal transduction and intimate
attachment- Bacterial signal proteins
injected into the epi. cell by means of a
Type III secretion system changes to
the actin scaffold destruction of the
microvilli
Pedestal-like structures are produced
through secretion of a conserved bacterial
receptor protein, Tir, via a type III
secretion system (T3SS)
19. Scanning electron micrographic (SEM) image of EPEC forming pedestals on
infected mammalian cells. Courtesy: Jorge Giron (University of Florida).
20. Normal microvilli Loss of microvilli
Uninfected Intestinal Cell Surface EPEC infected intestinal cells
21. Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli
• 1st recognised in 1982
• Common in developed countries
• “Sakai” strain caused Sakai/Osaka
outbreak in 1996
– >9000 cases, 12 deaths.
• Several other outbreaks of EHEC
(e.g. in California spinach, Sept 2006)
• Outbreaks usually linked to manure/
fecal contamination of food
• Commensal in cattle
22. EHEC: An introduction
stx1 or stx2 gene typically acquired by a lambdoid bacteriophage qualifies it as
Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) or verocytotoxin producing E. coli (VTEC)
EHEC is a subset of STEC: Mainly ssociation with hemorrhagic colitis (HC)
A/E lesion formation is caused by the
T3SS encoded by the LEE, which injects
small effector proteins into the host cell
STEC O157:H7 strains carry a plasmid
called pO157 that contains a catalase-peroxidase
gene (katP) and genes for
other virulence factors such as an
enterohemolysin (ehx) and toxB and espP
stx1 HUS
stx2 more severe sequele
23. • Stx binds to globotriaosylceramide receptor (Gb3) on the surface of endothelial
cells & is internalized through the retrograde pathway from Golgi apparatus & ER
and eventually to the cytoplasm
• STEC is able to cross the intestinal epithelium through microfold cells (Mcells)
and survive in macrophages released into the bloodstream, where it can target
other organs (Etienne-Mesmin et. al., 2011)
• Cytolethal distending toxin (cdtABC) (Janka et al., 2003)
• The EHEC hemolysin (EHEC-hlyA or ehx) - a pore-forming toxin. Ehx was found
to be cytotoxic to endothelial cells and may contribute to the development of HUS
(Aldick et. al., 2007)
• Autotransporters in STEC is serine protease EspP. EspP is a multifunctional
protease that cleaves human coagulation factor V, pepsin A ( Brunder et. al., 1997)
24. EHEC virulence factors
Shiga-like Toxin
(aka SLT; Vero-Toxin; VT; Stx)
A/E Lesion
Type III secretion
plus pO157-encoded
ToxB
26. EHEC genetics of virulence
Shiga Toxin and T3SS effectors
encoded by bacteriophages
27. • Common serogroup O157:H7: Adulterant
in beef since 1994 in U.S
• USDA: 6 more EHEC serogroups
adulterants, i.e., O26, O45, O103, O111,
O121, and O145 (also known as “Big 6”)
• Transmission: Ruminants reservoir
• Faeco-oral route; low I.D ≈ 10-100 org.
• Form viable-but-nonculturable (VBNC) on
food and are still able to produce the Shiga
toxin replicate & survive for long
periods of time on various food sources
(Dinu and Bach, 2011)
• Internalization inside spinach leaf tissue
(Saldaña et al., 2011)
• Asymptomatic shedders: person-to-person
transmission
TRANSMISSION
28. EHEC regulates both acid
resistance and the LEE genes
• Transcriptional regulator SdiA regulates both transcription of the LEE genes for A/E
lesion formation and the gad genes for acid resistance in cattle
• SdiA senses acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs) produced by other bacteria in rumen
activate the gad genes - vital to acid resistance for the passage through the acidic
stomachs, and repress the LEE genes- prevent colonization within the rumen
• EHEC does not encounter AHLs beyond the rumen, alleviating the SdiA-mediated
repression of the LEE and allowing EHEC to colonize the RAJ (Hughes et al., 2010)
29. STEC beyond EHEC…
the German E. coli O104:H4 outbreak
• May-July 2011
• >4000 cases
• >40 deaths
• Link to sprouting seeds
• High risk of HUS
• Females particularly at risk
30. Take-away messages
• Infection still presents threat even in the most advanced societies
• Pathogens don’t bother with passports!
– Not a new strain: something similar seen in Germany ten years ago and in
Korea
– closest genome-sequenced strain was isolated from Central African
Republic in late 1990s, belongs to an enteroaggregative lineage
• German STEC probably comes from a lineage circulating in human
populations rather than from an animal source (unlike E. coli O157)
• Bacteria evolve quickly
– Virulence factors in E. coli can jump from one lineage to another on
mobile genetic elements
– Pathotypes can overlap and evolve
– Antibiotic resistance seen where no obvious prior use of antibiotics
31. Clinical considerations:
• Mild watery diarrhea bloody diarrhea
(HC) HUS
• I.P- for STEC O157:H7 is about 3 days
Symptoms
– Diarrhea
– Fever
– Abdominal cramping
– Aomiting
– Hemorrhagic colitis
– Longterm sequelae (in 20 to 40% of
patients) include cardiac complications,
neurological disorders, hypertension,
chronic renal disease, cognition and
behavior changes.
– It has been recommended that follow-up
assessments for late-onset sequelae be
done for at least 5 years (Rosales et. al., 2012)
32. Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC)
• Major cause of traveler’s diarrhea &
endemic in underdeveloped countries
• Ability to produce either a heat-labile (LT)
or a heat-stable (ST) entero- toxin, & it
carries a diverse set of colonization factors
(CFs) for adherence to the intestinal epi.
• Swine industry is also adversely affected-induced
diarrhea in neonatal &
postweaning piglets
• Nearly 840 mn annual cases of ETEC in
developing countries (Wennerås and Erling, 2004)
• Transmission: fecal-oral route- from
contaminated food and drinking water
• I.D: relatively high i.e., between 10⁶-10⁸
org. (Levine et. al., 1979)
Countries at high risk for traveler’s diarrhea (CDC, 2007)
33. Heat-labile toxin (LT)
• Plasmid-encoded
heterohexamericholotoxin,
closely related to cholera toxin
• single A subunit, two domains
linked by disulfide bridge
– A1: active toxin molecule
– A2: helical anchor to B pentamer
• intact A not enzymatically
active until nicked to A1, A2
– A1 subunit released by reduction
of disulfide bond
• pentameric B subunit
– binds to GM1 gangliosides
centered in caveolae on host cell
surface
– triggers endocytosis of holotoxin
34. Heat-labile toxin (LT)
• Assembled as an AB5 toxin, LT is a large toxin that is about 80% identical
to the cholera toxin
• Briefly, the pentameric B subunits bind to GM1 gangliosides at lipid rafts
to deliver the catalytic A subunit inside the cell
• Once inside the cell, the A subunit is trafficked through ER (retrograde) and
delivered to the host cytoplasm, where it ADP-ribosylates Gs, inhibiting its
GTPase activity and increasing cyclic AMP levels
• cAMP opens the cystic fibrosis transmembrane receptor (CFTR), resulting
in electrolytes and fluid loss into the intestinal lumen
(Jobling and Holmes, 2012)
35. Heat-stable toxin (ST)
• Small cysteine-rich peptide secreted by ETEC
– can be boiled!
• binds to extracellular domain of guanylylcyclase C
– molecular mimicry: resembles endogenous ligand
guanylin
• activates intracellular catalytic domain of
guanylylcyclase
– intracellular accumulation of cGMP
– activates cGMP-dependent protein kinase II
– leads to phosphorylation of CFTR
• Cl- secretion and inhibition of NaCl absorption
leads to osmotic diarrhea
37. Enteroaggregative E. coli
• Linked to persistent diarrhoea in
children
• Like ETEC strains bind to
enterocytes: do not invade
• Differ from ETEC strains
– do not adhere uniformly to mucosal
surface; form biofilms
– auto-aggregative: clump in small
aggregates (stacked-brick
appearance)
– relies on aggregative adherence
fimbriae (AAFs, related to Dr
family), dispersin
• Produce
– ST-like toxin EAST, but also
found in many commensals
– Autotransporters Pet and Pic
38. Pathogenesis:
Adherence to
the intestinal
mucosa
Biofilm formation
over enterocyte
surface
Release of toxins
Induction of proinflammatory
response
Mucosal toxicity & enhanced
intestinal secretion
(Cennimo et al., 2007)
39. Enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC)
• Facultative i/c bacillary dysentery
• Non-motile, lysine decarboxylase
negative & unable to ferment lactose
• Both the acquisition and loss of genes
commensal E. coli with an
extracellular lifestyle i/c pathogen
that is fully adapted to the diverse env.
challenges within its host
• Acquisition of the invasion plasmid
pINV and other virulence-associated,
mobile genetic element
• EIEC and Shigella are highly invasive
pathogens that use the intracellular
milieu of intestinal epithelial cells
(IECs) in the large intestine as their
replicative niche
40. • Penetration of epithelial barrier- through
M cells by transcytosis and macrophage
cell death by effector dependent
phagosomal escape and induction of
caspase I-dependent pyroptosis
• Invasion- by the ability of its effector
repertoire to subvert host cell signaling
pathways cell-to-cell spread
• Suppression of host immune response.
Host inflammatory responses, such as the
mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)
and NF-B pathways, as well as cytokine
production, are targeted and dampened by
multiple effectors, including OspG, OspF,
OspB, OspZ, OspI, and IpaH
• Intra- and intercellular movement- T3S
effectors are responsible
41. Diffusely Adherent E. coli (DAEC)
• DAEC pathotype describes
diarrheagenic E. coli strains
that attach to cells but do not
fall into classical patterns of
adherence, such as localized
or A/E. They have now
emerged as a unique group
and are considered distinct
from other pathotypes
Distinctive adhesion patterns displayed by E. coli strains
on HeLa cells in the presence of D-mannose (A)
Localized adherence (LA)- EPEC strain (B) Aggregative
adherence (AA)- EAEC (C) Diffusely adherent E. coli-bacterial
cells scattered on the surface of host cell as well
as on the abiotic surface (D) Non-adherent E. coli
42. E. Coli leading cause of UTI
– Clinical significance
– Is the leading cause of urinary tract infections
which can lead to acute cystitis (bladder
infection) and pyelonephritis (kidney infection)
pks : a pathogenicity island present in the genome of E. coli responsable of
sepsis and urinary tract infections
This cluster of genes encodes the production of a
putative hybrid peptide-polyketide genotoxin : Colibactin
R1 N
H
O
OH
H
N
O
O
OH
N
H
O
H
N
O
O
SH
S H
N
N
O
O
COOR2
CONH2
pks cluster: 52 kb
Colibactin in silico predicted struture
Nougayrede et al Science 2006
The most important secreted virulence factor of UPEC lipoprotein called α-haemolysin (HlyA)
pore-forming toxin, which belongs to the family of RTX (repeats in toxin) toxins
43. Facts on UTI
UPEC is the cause of community-acquired UTIs and a large portion of nosocomial UTIs,
accounting for substantial medical costs and morbidity and mortality worldwide
Among Gram -ve bacteria, E. coli is most frequent pathogen inducing acute renal failure
Urological complications- E. coli is the most common clinical isolate
• Women suffer more than males Short urethra
• Other factors
Urethral obstruction,
Urinary stones
Congenital malformation's
Neurological disorders,
Catheterization , Cystoscopy
Usually cystitis is produced from fecal strains
entering urethra
(Bein et. al., 2012)
45. Diagnosis: Cultural techniques
MacConkey agar: pH change- lactose fermentation
– E. coli colonies will appear red or pink on media
– Not all E. coli strains, particularly most EIEC and Shigella strains,
ferment lactose, so caution must be used when using this diagnostic
• EMB agar: a differential microbiological medium, which slightly inhibits the
growth of Gram-positive bacteria
– Rapid lactose fermentation produces acids, which lower the pH. This
encourages dye absorption by the colonies, which are now colored purple-black.
– Lactose non-fermenters may increase the pH by deamination of proteins.
This ensures that the dye is not absorbed. The colonies will be colorless.
– E. coli will give a distinctive metallic green sheen (due to the metachromatic
properties of the dyes, E. coli movement using flagella, and strong acid end-products
of fermentation)
– Sorbitol- MacConkey (SMAC) agar:
– EHEC O157:H7 isolates are unable to ferment sorbitol within a 24-h
period, they are easily distinguishable as clear colonies
46. Biochemical tests:
- Indole test- Positive (99% of E. coli strains)
Single best test for differentiation from other
members of Enterobacteriaceae (Nataro and Kaper, 1998)
- IMViC reaction : + + - -
Methyl-Red Test Voges-Proskauer Test
Indole test (+)
Methyl-Red test (+)
Voges-Proskauer test (-)
Citrate Utilisation test (-)
Catalase test (+)
Carbohydrate fermentation test (+)
Indole Test
Citrate Utilisation Test
Catalase Test
Glucose & Lactose
fermentation Test
47. Serotyping
• Kauffman classification scheme
– O (somatic) polysaccharides and H (flagellar)
surface Ag.
– Molecular methods such as PCR of genes
involved in O-antigen biogenesis (e.g., wzx and
wzy genes) and of fliC for the H antigen, can
also be used to identify the serotype
– Currently, there are 174 E. coli O and 53 E. coli
H antigens ( DebRoy et. al., 2011)
Informative for certain pathotypes (e.g.,
O157:H7)
• Some isolates: untypeable or bear cross-reactivity
between antigens.
H antigen depends on variation in flagellin
O antigen depends on variation in LPS
48. Typing methods:
• For phylogenetic analysis outbreaks, and
surveillance investigations.
• Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)
gold standard for typing epidemiological
investigations to discriminate between
outbreak isolates
• Multilocus variable-number tandem repeat
analysis (MVLA)
• Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) -
clonal complexes
• Molecular methods
• Higher discriminating ability
• Better characterization of the DEC
isolates (Dhanashree et al., 2012)
• Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
• Used to detect virulent genes
(Toma et al., 2003)
50. Treatment
– Antimicrobial therapy- E. coli was usually susceptible to a variety
of chemotherapeutic agents
– Scenario has changed rapidly: Drug resistant strains are
increasingly prevalent.
– It is essential to do susceptibility testing
– Treatment of patients with EHEC infections is not recommended
because it can increase the release of stx and actually trigger HUS
Drug resistance:
51. “Adopt the pace of nature: her secret is patience” - R. Emerson