SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 22
RATING SCALES
Definition
• A Rating scale is defined as a technique through which the observer or rater
categorizes the objects, events or persons on a continuum represented by a
series of continuous numerals
• A rating scale usually has two, three, five, seven, nine oreleven points on a
line with descriptive categories at both the ends followed sometimes with a
descriptive category in the middle of the continuum, too
• Example:-
Middle
Neutral
Positive end
Strongly agree
Negative end
Strongly disagree
According to
GUILFORD
1). Numerical Rating scales
2). Graphic scales
3). Percentage rating scales
4). Standard scales
5). Scales of cumulated points
6). Forced choice scales
Numerical scales Numerical scales are the easiest to construct and apply to the objects,
persons and events etc to be rated.
In numerical scale the observer or rater is supplied with a sequence of numbers which is
well defined and his task is to rate the objects on the given sequence of numbers on the basis
of his impression.
Sometimes, it is found that numerical scales have only a description of the category and no
numbers are provided. After rating by the observer, the investigator assigns numerals to
certain categories
e.g- 5 to "strongly agree", 4 to" agree", 3 to "indifferent", 2 to "disagree", I to
"strongly disagree".
Sometimes still more fine discrimination is needed in such scale. Scales with numerical
anchors
Numerical scale:-
Scales with Numerical anchors:-
Numerical anchors
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Meaning
Extremely disagree
Strongly disagree
Moderately disagree
Midly disagree
Indifferent
Mildly agree
Moderately agree
Strongly agree
Extremely agree
 Usually, the above numerical anchors along with their meaning are printed on the first page
with appropriate instructions and on subsequent pages, a number of statements revealing
various impressions, attitudes etc.. regarding the objects, persons and events are pointed.
 Opposite each statement is provided a blank space where the rater writes simply that
number which he thinks to be the most appropriate one.
 Example:-
1. Nationalization of the private sector would make the country richer.
2. Nationalization enables the government to make sound policies regarding
the development of the country.
Contnd…
 When the scale points are without numerical anchors, each statement is provided with all
the descriptive cueswhere the rater puts a tick mark only on that cue which he thinks is the
most appropriate.
 Example:-
1. More and more countries should join UNO.
Strongly agree Agree Indifferent Disagree Strongly disagree
2. Political leaders should obey the directions of the UNO.
Strongly agree Agree Indifferent Disagree Strongly disagree
Contnd…
 Some of the numerical scales are assigned a rating of "0" to the neutral point & +3.+2+1 for
the different categories towards the positive ends and -3, -2, -1 towards the negative ends.
 Example:- +3 Strongly agree -3 Strongly disagree
+2 Mildly agree -2 Mildly disagree
+1 Agree -1Disagree
Demerits:-
 The rater has to remember the meaning of the numerical anchor while he is writing the the
numbers in the box.
 To avoid this difficulty, nowadays most numerical rating scales are being designed in such a
way that on each page the numerical anchors along with their meaning are given
Contnd…
The graphic rating scale is the most popular and widely used rating scale. In one way the
graphic scale may be considered as an improvement over the numerical scale.
On the graphic scale the scales are presented graphically in which descriptive cues
corresponding to the different scale steps are given.
Items or statements here have no blank box and rater simply puts either a tick mark or a
cross mark on any of the descriptive cues to indicate his view.
GRAPHIC RATING SCALE
GRAPHIC RATING SCALE
Limitation of graphic scale:- They provide space only for the shorter descriptive cues.
Advantages of graphic scales:
1. They have no numerical anchors. As such the rater experience no confusion arising out of
the need for numerical discrimination.
2. They are simple, easily administered and quickly completed by the raters.
 Disadvantage:- Graphic scales take time and labour in scoring
Contnd…
Percentage rating is done whenever the investigator wants a quick rating with maximum
uniformity from rater to rater.
The technique requires the rater to place the rates among different specified percentage
groups or into different percentiles or quartiles such as given below:
o Highest 5 percent
o Second highest 5 percent
o Highest 25 percent excluding the top 25 per cent
o Top half but not the top 25 per cent
o Lower half
Percentage scale:-
 Percentage ratings are common among teachers who are asked to rate their students in the
classroom in terms of overall performance
 Limitation: The rater may be quite generous and therefore, the rating may be influenced by
the individual differences in generosity among raters.
Contnd…
Standard scales are not very popular rating scales for psychological measurement.
In it the rater is presented with some standards with pre-established scale values. These
standards usually consist of objects of the same kind
eg they any be the names of persons.
Man-to-man scale and portrait matching are based on the principle of standard scale.
Man-to-man scale was developed during world war and it used men instead of members and
adjectives or other descriptive cues to represent the various scale points.
The rater may be asked to give the name of the person who is well known to him and who is
very high on the trait being rated.
That person's name is noted down to define "very high" point on the scale.
STANDARD SCALE
 Thus the scale with its five scale points very high, high, average, low, very low is complete.
 The rater is then given only those key names with pre established five point scale values to
rate other persons.
 Here the rater's task is very simple because he is required to compare the new person or
persons with the five key persons on the trait in the question.
 The value of rating corresponds to the value of that key person whom he resembles.
Contnd…
Advantages:-
1. Avoids confusion arising out of abstract numerical anchors assigned to the traits to be rated.
2. If all the raters use the same key-man in their ratings, their ratings can be comparable both
in absolute terms as well as in relative terms.
3. Since the scale values of all the key men are pre-established and fixed, raters can't shift over
day to day's ratings
Disadvantages:-
1. The distance between the key men of the scale is not equal
2. Actual practice has demonstrated that no two raters are alike in rating persons who are well
known to them
3. Deliberate overestimation and underestimation of persons by the raters are not controlled by
the scale.
Contnd…
It is another rating scale which is based on the principle of standard scale
In this technique a set of standards for any given trait on which rating is to be done, is
prepared.
For constructing the verbal portrait regarding a given trait, large number of verbal
statements describing that trait are collected and each is written on a separate card.
Subsequently, they are rank ordered by a group of judges or experts.
After that a desired number of sketches or portraits are prepared on the basis of those
statements, which have about the same average rank.
Portrait matching
The scale value of each portrait is determined.
For determining the scale value, the portraits are given to another group of judges for
ranking them and mean rank becomes the scale value.
The rater is given all the verbal portraits to read and then he names the persons who belong
to the portraits.
The chances are that within a single portraits several persons may be placed and a single
person may be placed under more than one portrait.
Contnd…
Merit:-
It eliminates the element of subjectivity which is common in man-to-man scale
 Demerit It does not provide objective and realistic standard scale points
Contnd…
Rating scales based upon cumulated or summated points are the most common. Here's the
persons total score is the sum of individual ratings or points assigned to all the items of the
scale.
At a glance these scales may seem to be identical with the psychological tests.
But they differ from them, as in psychological tests items are answered by the persons
themselves whereas the rating scale tems which are based upon stammated ratings are
answered by another person ie by observer.
It has two types
1. Checklist
2. Guess who technique
SCALE OF CUMULATED VALUES
Checklist:-
 it is a method where the rater is supplied with large number of specific behavioural
statements and he is asked to check these statements.
 The person is then characterized by only these statements which have been checked for
him. Such a checklist is called behavior checklist.
 One of very convenient way of scoring the checked statements is to score each favourable
statement as +1, each unfavorable statement as -1.
 There are several variations of behavior checklists.
 The items of the checklist may be in the form of two-point responses or multiple choice
form.
Contnd…
Numerical scales Numerical scales are the easiest to construct and apply to the objects,
persons and events etc to be rated.
In numerical scale the observer or rater is supplied with a sequence of numbers which is
well defined and his task is to rate the objects on the given sequence of numbers on the basis
of his impression.
Sometimes, it is found that numerical scales have only a description of the category and no
numbers are provided. After rating by the observer, the investigator assigns numerals to
certain categories
e.g- 5 to "strongly agree", 4 to" agree", 3 to "indifferent", 2 to "disagree", I to "strongly
disagree".
Sometimes still more fine discrimination is needed in such scale. Scales with numerical
anchors
Numerical scale:-

More Related Content

What's hot

Achievement test - Teacher Made Test and Standardized Test - Characteristics,...
Achievement test - Teacher Made Test and Standardized Test - Characteristics,...Achievement test - Teacher Made Test and Standardized Test - Characteristics,...
Achievement test - Teacher Made Test and Standardized Test - Characteristics,...Suresh Babu
 
Objective Types of test...
Objective Types of test...Objective Types of test...
Objective Types of test...M Saqib
 
Objective type tests items - Merits and Demerits || merits and Demerits of ob...
Objective type tests items - Merits and Demerits || merits and Demerits of ob...Objective type tests items - Merits and Demerits || merits and Demerits of ob...
Objective type tests items - Merits and Demerits || merits and Demerits of ob...Samir (G. Husain)
 
Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE)
Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE)Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE)
Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE)Suresh Babu
 
Objective Based and Competency Based Evaluation
Objective Based and Competency Based EvaluationObjective Based and Competency Based Evaluation
Objective Based and Competency Based EvaluationSuresh Babu
 
Norms Referenced and Criteria Referenced Evaluation
Norms Referenced and Criteria Referenced EvaluationNorms Referenced and Criteria Referenced Evaluation
Norms Referenced and Criteria Referenced EvaluationSuresh Babu
 
Assessment Approaches: Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment
Assessment Approaches: Quantitative and Qualitative AssessmentAssessment Approaches: Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment
Assessment Approaches: Quantitative and Qualitative AssessmentKiranMalik37
 
Objective type of test
Objective type of testObjective type of test
Objective type of testHennaAnsari
 
Short answer questions
Short answer questionsShort answer questions
Short answer questionsgusainrahul
 

What's hot (20)

Achievement test - Teacher Made Test and Standardized Test - Characteristics,...
Achievement test - Teacher Made Test and Standardized Test - Characteristics,...Achievement test - Teacher Made Test and Standardized Test - Characteristics,...
Achievement test - Teacher Made Test and Standardized Test - Characteristics,...
 
Objective Types of test...
Objective Types of test...Objective Types of test...
Objective Types of test...
 
Objective type tests items - Merits and Demerits || merits and Demerits of ob...
Objective type tests items - Merits and Demerits || merits and Demerits of ob...Objective type tests items - Merits and Demerits || merits and Demerits of ob...
Objective type tests items - Merits and Demerits || merits and Demerits of ob...
 
Rating Scale
Rating ScaleRating Scale
Rating Scale
 
Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE)
Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE)Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE)
Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE)
 
Checklist
ChecklistChecklist
Checklist
 
Rating scales
Rating scalesRating scales
Rating scales
 
Objective Based and Competency Based Evaluation
Objective Based and Competency Based EvaluationObjective Based and Competency Based Evaluation
Objective Based and Competency Based Evaluation
 
Essay Type Test
Essay Type TestEssay Type Test
Essay Type Test
 
Rating scale : A Tool of Evaluation
Rating scale :  A Tool of EvaluationRating scale :  A Tool of Evaluation
Rating scale : A Tool of Evaluation
 
Attitude scale
Attitude scaleAttitude scale
Attitude scale
 
Norms Referenced and Criteria Referenced Evaluation
Norms Referenced and Criteria Referenced EvaluationNorms Referenced and Criteria Referenced Evaluation
Norms Referenced and Criteria Referenced Evaluation
 
Education or attitude scales
 Education or attitude scales Education or attitude scales
Education or attitude scales
 
Rating scale
Rating scaleRating scale
Rating scale
 
Test construction essay tests
Test construction  essay testsTest construction  essay tests
Test construction essay tests
 
essat type question
essat type question essat type question
essat type question
 
Question Paper Setting
Question Paper SettingQuestion Paper Setting
Question Paper Setting
 
Assessment Approaches: Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment
Assessment Approaches: Quantitative and Qualitative AssessmentAssessment Approaches: Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment
Assessment Approaches: Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment
 
Objective type of test
Objective type of testObjective type of test
Objective type of test
 
Short answer questions
Short answer questionsShort answer questions
Short answer questions
 

Similar to rating scale.pptx

Scaling 120121081027-phpapp01
Scaling 120121081027-phpapp01Scaling 120121081027-phpapp01
Scaling 120121081027-phpapp01Surabhi Prajapati
 
Mesurement and Scaling.pptx
Mesurement and Scaling.pptxMesurement and Scaling.pptx
Mesurement and Scaling.pptxCHIPPYFRANCIS
 
eeMba ii rm unit-3.1 measurement & scaling a
eeMba ii rm unit-3.1 measurement & scaling aeeMba ii rm unit-3.1 measurement & scaling a
eeMba ii rm unit-3.1 measurement & scaling aRai University
 
SCALE , CLASSIFICATION OF SCALE AND IMPORTANCE OF SCALING TECHNIQUES.pptx
SCALE , CLASSIFICATION OF SCALE AND IMPORTANCE OF SCALING TECHNIQUES.pptxSCALE , CLASSIFICATION OF SCALE AND IMPORTANCE OF SCALING TECHNIQUES.pptx
SCALE , CLASSIFICATION OF SCALE AND IMPORTANCE OF SCALING TECHNIQUES.pptxAnshutChitransh
 
Measurement & scaling ,Research methodology
    Measurement & scaling ,Research methodology    Measurement & scaling ,Research methodology
Measurement & scaling ,Research methodologySONA SEBASTIAN
 
Scaling concepts
Scaling conceptsScaling concepts
Scaling conceptsNijaz N
 
Scaling techniques (unit iv) shradha
Scaling techniques (unit iv)   shradhaScaling techniques (unit iv)   shradha
Scaling techniques (unit iv) shradhaShilpi Vaishkiyar
 
Chotu scaling techniques
Chotu scaling techniquesChotu scaling techniques
Chotu scaling techniquesPruseth Abhisek
 
Rating scale
Rating scaleRating scale
Rating scaleNaj_Jandy
 
self report Instrument.pptx
 self report Instrument.pptx self report Instrument.pptx
self report Instrument.pptxChinna Chadayan
 
Measurement and scaling techniques
Measurement and scaling techniquesMeasurement and scaling techniques
Measurement and scaling techniquesKritika Jain
 
Measurement and scaling techniques
Measurement  and  scaling  techniquesMeasurement  and  scaling  techniques
Measurement and scaling techniquesUjjwal 'Shanu'
 
Measurement and scaling techniques
Measurement and scaling techniquesMeasurement and scaling techniques
Measurement and scaling techniquesSarfaraz Ahmad
 

Similar to rating scale.pptx (20)

Rating scale ppt
Rating scale pptRating scale ppt
Rating scale ppt
 
Scaling 120121081027-phpapp01
Scaling 120121081027-phpapp01Scaling 120121081027-phpapp01
Scaling 120121081027-phpapp01
 
Mesurement and Scaling.pptx
Mesurement and Scaling.pptxMesurement and Scaling.pptx
Mesurement and Scaling.pptx
 
Measurement scaling
Measurement   scalingMeasurement   scaling
Measurement scaling
 
eeMba ii rm unit-3.1 measurement & scaling a
eeMba ii rm unit-3.1 measurement & scaling aeeMba ii rm unit-3.1 measurement & scaling a
eeMba ii rm unit-3.1 measurement & scaling a
 
BRM Unit II
BRM Unit IIBRM Unit II
BRM Unit II
 
SCALE , CLASSIFICATION OF SCALE AND IMPORTANCE OF SCALING TECHNIQUES.pptx
SCALE , CLASSIFICATION OF SCALE AND IMPORTANCE OF SCALING TECHNIQUES.pptxSCALE , CLASSIFICATION OF SCALE AND IMPORTANCE OF SCALING TECHNIQUES.pptx
SCALE , CLASSIFICATION OF SCALE AND IMPORTANCE OF SCALING TECHNIQUES.pptx
 
Measurement & scaling ,Research methodology
    Measurement & scaling ,Research methodology    Measurement & scaling ,Research methodology
Measurement & scaling ,Research methodology
 
Scaling concepts
Scaling conceptsScaling concepts
Scaling concepts
 
Scaling techniques (unit iv) shradha
Scaling techniques (unit iv)   shradhaScaling techniques (unit iv)   shradha
Scaling techniques (unit iv) shradha
 
ch 13.pptx
ch 13.pptxch 13.pptx
ch 13.pptx
 
Chotu scaling techniques
Chotu scaling techniquesChotu scaling techniques
Chotu scaling techniques
 
Rating scale
Rating scaleRating scale
Rating scale
 
1 rating
1 rating1 rating
1 rating
 
self report Instrument.pptx
 self report Instrument.pptx self report Instrument.pptx
self report Instrument.pptx
 
Measurement and scaling techniques
Measurement and scaling techniquesMeasurement and scaling techniques
Measurement and scaling techniques
 
unit 2.4.ppt
unit 2.4.pptunit 2.4.ppt
unit 2.4.ppt
 
Measurement and scaling techniques
Measurement  and  scaling  techniquesMeasurement  and  scaling  techniques
Measurement and scaling techniques
 
Measurement & Scaling
Measurement & ScalingMeasurement & Scaling
Measurement & Scaling
 
Measurement and scaling techniques
Measurement and scaling techniquesMeasurement and scaling techniques
Measurement and scaling techniques
 

Recently uploaded

Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxnegromaestrong
 
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdfAn Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdfSanaAli374401
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfagholdier
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityGeoBlogs
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactPECB
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfJayanti Pande
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...EduSkills OECD
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxVishalSingh1417
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhikauryashika82
 
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...KokoStevan
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphThiyagu K
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxVishalSingh1417
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactdawncurless
 
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.MateoGardella
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxAreebaZafar22
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdfQucHHunhnh
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptxINDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
 
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdfAn Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 

rating scale.pptx

  • 2. Definition • A Rating scale is defined as a technique through which the observer or rater categorizes the objects, events or persons on a continuum represented by a series of continuous numerals • A rating scale usually has two, three, five, seven, nine oreleven points on a line with descriptive categories at both the ends followed sometimes with a descriptive category in the middle of the continuum, too • Example:- Middle Neutral Positive end Strongly agree Negative end Strongly disagree
  • 3. According to GUILFORD 1). Numerical Rating scales 2). Graphic scales 3). Percentage rating scales 4). Standard scales 5). Scales of cumulated points 6). Forced choice scales
  • 4. Numerical scales Numerical scales are the easiest to construct and apply to the objects, persons and events etc to be rated. In numerical scale the observer or rater is supplied with a sequence of numbers which is well defined and his task is to rate the objects on the given sequence of numbers on the basis of his impression. Sometimes, it is found that numerical scales have only a description of the category and no numbers are provided. After rating by the observer, the investigator assigns numerals to certain categories e.g- 5 to "strongly agree", 4 to" agree", 3 to "indifferent", 2 to "disagree", I to "strongly disagree". Sometimes still more fine discrimination is needed in such scale. Scales with numerical anchors Numerical scale:-
  • 5. Scales with Numerical anchors:- Numerical anchors 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Meaning Extremely disagree Strongly disagree Moderately disagree Midly disagree Indifferent Mildly agree Moderately agree Strongly agree Extremely agree
  • 6.  Usually, the above numerical anchors along with their meaning are printed on the first page with appropriate instructions and on subsequent pages, a number of statements revealing various impressions, attitudes etc.. regarding the objects, persons and events are pointed.  Opposite each statement is provided a blank space where the rater writes simply that number which he thinks to be the most appropriate one.  Example:- 1. Nationalization of the private sector would make the country richer. 2. Nationalization enables the government to make sound policies regarding the development of the country. Contnd…
  • 7.  When the scale points are without numerical anchors, each statement is provided with all the descriptive cueswhere the rater puts a tick mark only on that cue which he thinks is the most appropriate.  Example:- 1. More and more countries should join UNO. Strongly agree Agree Indifferent Disagree Strongly disagree 2. Political leaders should obey the directions of the UNO. Strongly agree Agree Indifferent Disagree Strongly disagree Contnd…
  • 8.  Some of the numerical scales are assigned a rating of "0" to the neutral point & +3.+2+1 for the different categories towards the positive ends and -3, -2, -1 towards the negative ends.  Example:- +3 Strongly agree -3 Strongly disagree +2 Mildly agree -2 Mildly disagree +1 Agree -1Disagree Demerits:-  The rater has to remember the meaning of the numerical anchor while he is writing the the numbers in the box.  To avoid this difficulty, nowadays most numerical rating scales are being designed in such a way that on each page the numerical anchors along with their meaning are given Contnd…
  • 9. The graphic rating scale is the most popular and widely used rating scale. In one way the graphic scale may be considered as an improvement over the numerical scale. On the graphic scale the scales are presented graphically in which descriptive cues corresponding to the different scale steps are given. Items or statements here have no blank box and rater simply puts either a tick mark or a cross mark on any of the descriptive cues to indicate his view. GRAPHIC RATING SCALE
  • 11. Limitation of graphic scale:- They provide space only for the shorter descriptive cues. Advantages of graphic scales: 1. They have no numerical anchors. As such the rater experience no confusion arising out of the need for numerical discrimination. 2. They are simple, easily administered and quickly completed by the raters.  Disadvantage:- Graphic scales take time and labour in scoring Contnd…
  • 12. Percentage rating is done whenever the investigator wants a quick rating with maximum uniformity from rater to rater. The technique requires the rater to place the rates among different specified percentage groups or into different percentiles or quartiles such as given below: o Highest 5 percent o Second highest 5 percent o Highest 25 percent excluding the top 25 per cent o Top half but not the top 25 per cent o Lower half Percentage scale:-
  • 13.  Percentage ratings are common among teachers who are asked to rate their students in the classroom in terms of overall performance  Limitation: The rater may be quite generous and therefore, the rating may be influenced by the individual differences in generosity among raters. Contnd…
  • 14. Standard scales are not very popular rating scales for psychological measurement. In it the rater is presented with some standards with pre-established scale values. These standards usually consist of objects of the same kind eg they any be the names of persons. Man-to-man scale and portrait matching are based on the principle of standard scale. Man-to-man scale was developed during world war and it used men instead of members and adjectives or other descriptive cues to represent the various scale points. The rater may be asked to give the name of the person who is well known to him and who is very high on the trait being rated. That person's name is noted down to define "very high" point on the scale. STANDARD SCALE
  • 15.  Thus the scale with its five scale points very high, high, average, low, very low is complete.  The rater is then given only those key names with pre established five point scale values to rate other persons.  Here the rater's task is very simple because he is required to compare the new person or persons with the five key persons on the trait in the question.  The value of rating corresponds to the value of that key person whom he resembles. Contnd…
  • 16. Advantages:- 1. Avoids confusion arising out of abstract numerical anchors assigned to the traits to be rated. 2. If all the raters use the same key-man in their ratings, their ratings can be comparable both in absolute terms as well as in relative terms. 3. Since the scale values of all the key men are pre-established and fixed, raters can't shift over day to day's ratings Disadvantages:- 1. The distance between the key men of the scale is not equal 2. Actual practice has demonstrated that no two raters are alike in rating persons who are well known to them 3. Deliberate overestimation and underestimation of persons by the raters are not controlled by the scale. Contnd…
  • 17. It is another rating scale which is based on the principle of standard scale In this technique a set of standards for any given trait on which rating is to be done, is prepared. For constructing the verbal portrait regarding a given trait, large number of verbal statements describing that trait are collected and each is written on a separate card. Subsequently, they are rank ordered by a group of judges or experts. After that a desired number of sketches or portraits are prepared on the basis of those statements, which have about the same average rank. Portrait matching
  • 18. The scale value of each portrait is determined. For determining the scale value, the portraits are given to another group of judges for ranking them and mean rank becomes the scale value. The rater is given all the verbal portraits to read and then he names the persons who belong to the portraits. The chances are that within a single portraits several persons may be placed and a single person may be placed under more than one portrait. Contnd…
  • 19. Merit:- It eliminates the element of subjectivity which is common in man-to-man scale  Demerit It does not provide objective and realistic standard scale points Contnd…
  • 20. Rating scales based upon cumulated or summated points are the most common. Here's the persons total score is the sum of individual ratings or points assigned to all the items of the scale. At a glance these scales may seem to be identical with the psychological tests. But they differ from them, as in psychological tests items are answered by the persons themselves whereas the rating scale tems which are based upon stammated ratings are answered by another person ie by observer. It has two types 1. Checklist 2. Guess who technique SCALE OF CUMULATED VALUES
  • 21. Checklist:-  it is a method where the rater is supplied with large number of specific behavioural statements and he is asked to check these statements.  The person is then characterized by only these statements which have been checked for him. Such a checklist is called behavior checklist.  One of very convenient way of scoring the checked statements is to score each favourable statement as +1, each unfavorable statement as -1.  There are several variations of behavior checklists.  The items of the checklist may be in the form of two-point responses or multiple choice form. Contnd…
  • 22. Numerical scales Numerical scales are the easiest to construct and apply to the objects, persons and events etc to be rated. In numerical scale the observer or rater is supplied with a sequence of numbers which is well defined and his task is to rate the objects on the given sequence of numbers on the basis of his impression. Sometimes, it is found that numerical scales have only a description of the category and no numbers are provided. After rating by the observer, the investigator assigns numerals to certain categories e.g- 5 to "strongly agree", 4 to" agree", 3 to "indifferent", 2 to "disagree", I to "strongly disagree". Sometimes still more fine discrimination is needed in such scale. Scales with numerical anchors Numerical scale:-