Discuss about the joint efforts and commitments outlined by our customers in their annual reports incl. CSR (corporate social responsibility)
Possible intro:
Reaching this ambitious goal requires all parts of society to actively work together. A systemic, integrated approach to decarbonisation, where demand and supply are matched, and asset lifetime is extended to its maximum.
Enhanced Collaboration portion to be enhanced with the following points:
Working together on out of the box ideas to extend asset lifetime and improve losses
Hold ourselves accountable for joint and transparent KPI focused on Circular Economy
Share our successes and become leaders and drivers in our sectors regarding Circular Economy projects
We as manufacturers and you as network operator, use large quantities of materials and, indirectly, of raw materials. We have a responsibility to do the best we can when it comes to the sourcing and use of our materials
Side note: Common mineral oil used: FR3. When refining the oil, parts of it will be incinerated.
If asked what is the PT range:
- High voltage ranging from 115 kV to 500 kV and low voltage ranging from 69 kV to 230 kV
- Power level ranging from 100 MVA to 600 MVA (three single-phase units are envisioned, each rated from 33.3 to 200 MVA)
When it comes to transformer asset management, an operator’s main objectives are to reduce the risk of a failure and minimize the impact if a failure does occur. We provide support to the operators to help make intelligent maintenance decisions and comfortably face risks and unforeseen challenges
Digitalization – optimization of maintenance tasks, reducing # of site visits and decreasing CO2 emissions, plus better asset understanding
Consulting – remote expert assistance for transformer interpretation and help with corrective maintenance and tech. economic eval.
Mid-life refurbishments to rejuvenate transformer; ie coolers, radiators, breathers, pumps, re-gasketing, oil filtration, tap changer revision and retightening and drying of the active part.
Where possible re-engineering to decrease losses and max. MVA/tank size
Various On-Site services – high level discussion
We got informed and we started to re-work our portfolio to see how we could help in the circularity journey.
1-Refurbished/re-used products that can substitute new products could save energy
2-Recycling and re-manufacturing would outweigh material extraction, manufacturing costs and loss differences (energy intensive)
3-End of life of a product to be replaced with restoration of energy and asset life extension (paper ins. life extension in the windings and bushings and taps depending on applications)
From our portfolio offering we can see that extending transformer lifetime to reduce manufacturing CO2 footprint.
We can work together to utilize:
Condition Monitoring with our eDevices, CoreX offerings combined with our Asset Management system (APM) for better understanding of our asset(s) classification
Txplore to detect PCB contamination and routine visual inspection of the transformer core/windings with minimum downtime and environmental impact
Access to our global consultancy network to support with asset and fleet assessment and work on a joint service strategy that will benefit you, the customer and the environment
On-site services where we can:
Performing transformer rehabilitation by restoring key components, regenerating oil and safely collecting and recycling replaced parts.
Quick deployment of the High Voltage Testing equipment to measure critical parameters
LFH drying and ability to deploy a factory repair on-site without the need of CO2 and cost intensive logistics.
New transformer GHG footprint = 144.198t CO2e
Transportation Assumption = 1500km travelled where 1000km are travelled by rail and 500km by road = 3,208kg CO2e + 4,520kg CO2e = 7,728kg CO2e = 7.7t CO2e
TOTAL CO2e footprint for a new transformer= 152t CO2e
Assumption here is that we use 50kg of e-steel in components swap @ 2,764556kg CO2 = 138.22kg CO2e + 36kg copper @ 4,666kg CO2 = 59.78kg CO2e = 0.198t CO2e
On-Site Mobilization = team + tools and material incl. windings assumption is 10t of material and 1500km travelled 1000km are travelled by rail and 500km by road = 10*0.022*1000 + 10*0.062*500 = 220 + 310 = 530kg CO2e
TOTAL CO2e footprint for a repaired transformer= 0.73t CO2e
Total Calculation = (144.2t + 7.7t (for the transformer and transportation)) – ((0.198t + 0.53t for the repair and mobiliziation) = 151.2t CO2e
OLTC Link: https://search.abb.com/library/Download.aspx?DocumentID=1ZSC000562-AAX&LanguageCode=en&DocumentPartID=&Action=Launch
OLTC rationale:
OLTC – VUC type worst case scenario 50kg and normal repairs approx. 20-25kg.
VUCG.N with C selector 380kV BIL @450-800A = 344kg material without oil and 529kg with oil. Assuming a major repair will take approx. 15% material to be replaced means approx. 50kg e-steel
Copper calculation assumption:
Bushing replacement and certain connection refurbishments @ 36kg copper.
SIDE NOTE ON TRANSPORT (if 40% will be challenged):
33MVA @500KUSD will have a minimum transport cost of 50KUSD (10%) given ideal scenario from Monselice to customer in NL
100MVA @1100KUSD will have a minimum transport cost of 109-120KUSD (9-11%) given ideal scenario from Monselice to customer in NL
Additional transport factors that will increase the price:
-design given weight, height, width that will impact tunnels and hwys + convoy requirements
-transport with or without oil given country regulation
-price can increase if we add loading and unloading
-location of the transformer if greenfield or brownfield where in brownfield there are construction constraints that will require additional equipment, manpower and time.
-on-site equipment to load and unload the transformer. If various cranes are needed then that will impact the price
New transformer GHG footprint= 292t CO2e
Transportation Assumption = 1500km travelled where 1000km are travelled by rail and 500km by road = 3,208kg CO2e + 4,520kg CO2e = 7,728kg CO2e = 7.7t CO2e
TOTAL CO2e footprint for a new transformer= 299.7t CO2e
Repair Assumption = New windings 77,765kg CO2e copper + 59 kg CO2e insulation +10% e-steel used to repair the core = 213kg CO2e = 78,037 kg CO2e for the repair
On-Site Mobilization = team + tools and material incl. windings assumption is 24t of material and 1500km travelled 1000km are travelled by rail and 500km by road = 24*0.022*1000 + 24*0.062*500 = 528 + 744 = 1,272kg CO2e
TOTAL CO2e footprint for a repaired transformer= 79.3t CO2e
Total Calculation = (292t + 7.7t (for the transformer and transportation)) – ((78t + 1.3t for the repair and mobiliziation) = 299.7t – 79.3t = 220.4t CO2e
SIDE NOTE ON TRANSPORT (if 40% will be challenged):
33MVA @500KUSD will have a minimum transport cost of 50KUSD (10%) given ideal scenario from Monselice to customer in NL
100MVA @1100KUSD will have a minimum transport cost of 109-120KUSD (9-11%) given ideal scenario from Monselice to customer in NL
Additional transport factors that will increase the price:
-design given weight, height, width that will impact tunnels and hwys + convoy requirements
-transport with or without oil given country regulation
-price can increase if we add loading and unloading
-location of the transformer if greenfield or brownfield where in brownfield there are construction constraints that will require additional equipment, manpower and time.
-on-site equipment to load and unload the transformer. If various cranes are needed then that will impact the price
New transformer GHG footprint= 225.5t CO2e
Transportation Assumption = 1500km travelled where 1000km are travelled by rail and 500km by road = 3,208kg CO2e + 4,520kg CO2e = 7,728kg CO2e = 7.7t CO2e
TOTAL CO2e footprint for a new transformer= 233.2t CO2e
Repair Assumption = New windings 118,450kg CO2e copper + 23 kg CO2e insulation +20% e-steel used to repair the core = 213kg CO2e = 118.686 kg CO2e for the repair
On-Site Mobilization = estimated 1/3 of the original transportation costs = 2,566kg CO2e
TOTAL CO2e footprint for a repaired transformer= 121.5t CO2e
-----
Question – what are the on-site factory repair vs factory repair risks?
Answer – We have to understand that the quality of work between On-site and Factory will be the same. The only difference is that with an On-site repair we need to work closely together to ensure that we have all the required accesses, tools, support from both sides. This will avoid delays.
Another point worth mentioning is that when performing major repairs, we could discover new things that might require attention and unplanned modifications, hence we need to be prepared with the customer to take the right decision and minimum delay.
Other examples where on-site could pose challenges:
-parts don’t get on site on time
-planning and communication mis-match
-process management (ie forgetting something) = loss time
-heavy machinery access (lifts)
Normally Tap changer maintenance, upgrades and bushing upgrades are no problem
The bigger the transformer the bigger the on-site challenges and better the collaboration is needed from both the customer and ourselves
SIDE NOTE ON TRANSPORT (if 40% will be challenged):
33MVA @500KUSD will have a minimum transport cost of 50KUSD (10%) given ideal scenario from Monselice to customer in NL
100MVA @1100KUSD will have a minimum transport cost of 109-120KUSD (9-11%) given ideal scenario from Monselice to customer in NL
Additional transport factors that will increase the price:
-design given weight, height, width that will impact tunnels and hwys + convoy requirements
-transport with or without oil given country regulation
-price can increase if we add loading and unloading
-location of the transformer if greenfield or brownfield where in brownfield there are construction constraints that will require additional equipment, manpower and time.
-on-site equipment to load and unload the transformer. If various cranes are needed then that will impact the price
Calculation done using data from Material CO2 Emissions slide.
Talk about the Environmental cleanup plus possible loss of revenue.
Bushings will fail in service and condition monitoring will also identify deteriorated bushings and families of bushings that need to be replaced. Both these activities require the availability of spare bushings to maintain the availability and reliability of transformers. Spares required on short-notice could become an issue and increase downtime + increase loss of revenue (where applicable) AS well as increased CO2 as short deliveries will require in some cases AIR FREIGHT
About the winding upgrades it should be mentioned that to decrease losses the copper material consumption will increase but the overall CO2e footprint will be reduced as previous windings will be recycled and reused, tank and other parts will be reused and the lower losses will decrease the overall CO2e footprint throughout the lifespan of the transformer when in service.
To add to additional deck
Treat this slide as digitalization = series of doctor test to determine overall health.
CS – slow failures and general overview
CSM10 – detailed blood work where we can observe possible upcoming issues and proactively tackle them
CT4 – the doctor, gathering all the information and providing his recommendation
APM – the specialist doctor, giving you detailed insights of each part of the transformer and how to restore balance
BM - eyes to see ahead and avoid critical failures
Txplore – non-invasive heart surgery
Digitalisation and investments in research and development are additional key approaches used to ensure effective asset integration and the electrification of consumption. These tools either directly contribute to GHG emission
reduction or indirectly contribute to enhancing system reliability, ensuring a high level of security, the proper functioning of markets and delivering value to end users as the system adapts to increased network loads.
Robert
D. Vukovic ppt
CO2e are not only reserved for power transformers. With our EconiQ brand we will be able to support customer commitments to cut SF6 & CO2e reduction by half during the product lifecycle of 30 years.
Power Consulting Sustainability Services support our customers addressing their unique environmental performance needs.
That means reducing risks and optimizing their environmental footprints along the entire value chain.
Our team performs complete technological, regulatory, environmental and economic analysis of different scenarios or alternatives providing the deep insights that our customers need to guide their sustainability-related initiatives and improve their overall efficiency.
To outline that eco-efficient solution in our portfolio can decrease CO2e while maintaining the same substation capacity.