Annotated Bibliography.Pdf

William O. Duba Bibliography July 5, 2017
1
William O. Duba
Annotated Bibliography
Someone complained recently that it was difficult to identify all of my publications that touched on a common theme, especially since many
were scattered in collective volumes, and asked that I supply a list of relevant publications. I confess In introductions to editions and other
unlikely places, I have brought up themes that are not immediately obvious. I’ve also observed that sites like ORCID or academia.edu are not
particularly helpful either, especially if the publications cannot (yet) be openly distributed.
For these reasons, I’ve taken the liberty of putting in table format all my writings that have either been published or that are in press, to
what research in what other publications it connects, what persons are discussed, and a brief summary (not an abstract) of what I can remember
about it at the moment.
Three notes:
Format: A = Article or Note in a Journal, C = Chapter in a collective volume, D = Digital Publication, E = Edition (volume), M = Monograph, T =
Thesis
Relates to: if an publication builds substantially on research developed in another article, I try to mention the numbers. Note that this is not an
exhaustive list of the overabundance of self‐citation, but rather a way of saying “I talked about accidental causation in #28, and I return to it
here, looking at someone else”.
Finally, at the end, I list collective volumes I’ve edited, book reviews, and translations, if anyone is particularly interested.
I apologise for the typos and inevitable factual mistakes. If you have any comments on inquiries, I can be reached at william.duba@unifr.ch
July 5, 2017.
No. Format Bibliographic Information Relates
to
Medieval Figures Notes
0 T The Cartulary of Vauluisant: A Critical Edition, MA
Thesis, The University of Iowa 1994
Revised edition 1996 (added
material from a fragment that
was inaccessible in 1994). 414
Documents from the Cartulary,
Vat. lat. 9901 from “1127” (1129)
to ca. 1229, along with the
originals and other material not
included in the text. Available

2
online.
1 A “The Afterlife in Medieval Frankish Cyprus”, Epitirida
of the Cyprus Research Centre 26 (2000), 167‐194.
Elias of Nabinaux OFM,
Raymond Bequini OP,
Peter de la Palude OP,
Richard Fitzralph,
Gregory Palamas,
Barlaam the Calabrian
The state of knowledge about
God, the role of science and
apodictic syllogisms in
theology, and the Paris‐trained
theologians at Cyprus and in
contact with the East in the
fourteenth centuries.
2 A “The Immaculate Conception in the works of Peter
Auriol”, Vivarium 38:1 (2000), 5‐34.
Peter Auriol Peter Auriol, book III of the
Sentences and Immaculate
Conception treatises, suggesting
an order among the redactions.
Some early suggestions about
Reportationes
3 A “Aristotle’s Metaphysics in Peter Auriol’s Commentary
on the Sentences”, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione
filosofica medievale (2001), 549‐572.
Peter Auriol Quantifies the citations to the
Metaphysics in the Rome printed
edition of Auriol’s work, shows
that Auriol’s text of reference is
Michael Scot’s Arabic‐Latin
translation along with Averroes’
Commentary.
4 C “Aristotelian Traditions in Franciscan Thought: Matter
and Potency according to Scotus and Auriol”, The
Origins of European Scholarship, ed. Ioannis Taifacos,
Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2006, 147‐61.
3 Peter Auriol, John Duns
Scotus
Originally the second half of #3,
but Del Punta didn’t want it.
John Duns Scotus and Peter
Auriol. The use of different
Aristotelian translations leads to
accusations of not
understanding Aristotle
5 C “Francis of Marchia on Christʹs Cognition in the
Word”, Intellect et imagination dans la Philosophie
Francis of Marchia Francis of Marchia, III Sent. q.
13, defends the possibility of a

3
Médiévale, eds. Maria Cândida Pacheco and José F.
Meirinhos, Turnhout: Brepols, 2006, vol. 3, 1613‐1624.
mediated intuitive cognition.
6 A “Francesco di Marchia sulla conoscenza intuitiva
mediata e immediata”, Picenum Seraphicum 22‐23
(2003‐04), 121‐157.
5 Francis of Marchia Francis of Marchia, edition of III
Sent. q. 13
7 C “Moral Edification, the Search for Truth, and the Papal
Court: Pierre Roger (Clement VI) and the Intellectual
Atmosphere of Avignon”, La vie culturelle, intellectuelle
et scientifique à la cour des papes d Avignon, ed.
Jacqueline Hamesse, Turnhout: Brepols, 2006, 303‐316.
Pierre Roger, Peter
Auriol, Richard Fitzralph
Pierre Roger recycled his 1325
Immaculate Conception sermon
for Avignon ca. 1344; in 1338 he
joked about Ad conditorem
canonum in the Franciscan
convent at Avignon.
8 C “Francesco di Marchia sull’Immaculata Concezione”,
Atti del II Convegno Internazionale su Francesco
d Appignano, eds. Domenico Priori and Massimo
Balena, Appignano del Tronto, 2004, 59‐75.
2, 5, 6 Francis of Marchia Francis of Marchia, III Sent., q. 8
9 D Edition of Petrus de Candia, In IV librum Sententiarum,
q. un., a. 2, parts 2 and 3 for the Peter of Candia
Homepage (http://www2.ucy.ac.cy/isa/Candia/SentIV‐
1‐2b.htm and
http://www2.ucy.ac.cy/isa/Candia/SentIV‐1‐2c.htm).
Peter of Candia Peter of Candia edition.
10 C “Se non ci fosse la redenzione, ci sarebbe l incarnazione? Il
rapporto fra la reparatio humani generis e la causa
dellʹincarnazione del Verbo secondo Francesco
dʹAppignano”, Atti del III Convegno Internazionale su
Francesco d Appignano, ed. Domenico Priori,
Appignano del Tronto, 2006, 35‐46.
5, 6, 8 Francis of Marchia Francis of Marchia, III Sent., q. 9
11 T Seeing God: Theology, Beatitude and Cognition in the
Thirteenth Century (374 pp.), Ph.D. Dissertation,
University of Iowa, 2006
Bonaventure, Thomas
Aquinas, Henry of Ghent
Bonaventure, Thomas Aquinas,
Henry of Ghent on Theology as
a Science, Cognition, Beatitude
and Christ’s cognition in the

4
Word
12 C “The Status of the Latin Patriarch of Constantinople
after the Fourth Crusade”, Medieval Diplomatics in the
Eastern Mediterranean, eds. Alexander Beihammer,
Maria Parani, Christopher Schabel, Leiden: Brill, 2008,
63‐91.
Innocent III, Honorius III Innocent III praised the
patriarch while emasculating
him. Honorius III followed suit.
13 C “Continental Franciscan Quodlibeta after Scotus”,
Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages: The Fourteenth
Century, ed. Christopher Schabel, Leiden: Brill, 2007,
569‐650.
Peter Sutton, Peter of
England, Alexander of
Alessandria, Nicholas of
Lyra, James of Ascoli,
Bertrand de la Tour,
Martin of Abbeville,
William of Alnwick,
Francis of Marchia,
Francis of Meyronnes,
Aufredo Gonteri Brito,
Peter of Atarrabia, Peter
Thomae, William of
Rubio, Gerald Odonis.
For each author: brief
bibliography, summary of
existing literature on their
quodlibets, list of question titles.
The questions of Vat. lat. 1012 in
appendix.
14 C “Francesco d’Appignano fra Parigi ed Avignone”, Atti
del IV Convegno Internazionale su Francesco d’Appignano,
ed. Domenico Priori, Appignano del Tronto, 2008, 91‐
106.
13 Francis of Marchia,
Francis of Meyronnes
Clearing the biography of
Francis of Marchia of the myth
of his being at Avignon in 1323
15 A “Francis of Marchia’s Quodlibet: The Testimony of BNF
MS 16110”, Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale, 49 (2007),
91‐102.
13 John Duns Scotus, Francis
of Marchia
The first two questions of
Francis of Marchia’s quodlibet
as published by Mariani are
actually from Scotus’ Reportatio.
Also, the manuscript contains a
promotion speech by a new arts
master; embarassing

5
emendation in footnotes.
16 A with Christopher Schabel, “Introduction (Geraldus
Odonis’ Life and Works)”, Vivarium 47:2‐3 (2009), 147‐
163.
13 Gerald Odonis Gerald Odonis biography and
bibliography
17 A “The Beatific Vision in the Sentences Commentary of
Geraldus Odonis”, Vivarium 47:2‐3 (2009), 348‐363.
5, 6, 7,
11, 13
Gerald Odonis, Francis of
Marchia
Gerald Odonis. Also relates to
his Quodlibet and the
circumstances of its production.
18 A with Christopher Schabel, “The Redactions of Francis
of Marchia’s Commentary on Book III of the
Sentences”, Picenum Seraphicum 25‐27 (2006‐2008), 69‐
100
5, 6, 8,
10
Francis of Marchia Providing an overview of
what’s known about the three
different versions of Marchia’s
III Sent.
19 E with Tiziana Suarez‐Nani (introduction, text),
Emmanuel Babey and Girard Etzkorn (text), Francisci
de Marchia Quaestiones in secundum librum Sententiarum
(Reportatio), qq. 1‐12, Leuven: Leuven University Press
(Ancient and Medieval Philosophy series 3: Francisci
de Marchia Opera Philosophica et Theologica 2,1)
2008, lxxxix + 272 pp. (ISBN 978 90 5867 700 6).
13, 14,
15, 18
Francis of Marchia Biography of Francis of
Marchia, Bibliography, Survey
of Works Written
20 A “Neither First, nor Second, nor in his Commentary on
the Sentences: Francis of Marchia’s intentiones neutrae”,
Quaestio: The Yearbook of the History of Metaphysics 10
(2010), 285‐313.
13, 15,
19
Francis of Marchia Francis of Marchia. Argues that
the “Quodlibet” is an early
work, based on the shift
speaking of intentiones neutrae in
the Quodlibet to rationes neutrae
in the Sentences and Metaphysics
questions.
21 C “What is Actually the Matter with Scotus? Landulphus
Caracciolo on Objective Potency and Hylomorphic
Unity”, Lo scotismo nel Mezzogiorno d’Italia, ed.
Francesco Fiorentino, Turnhout: Brepols, 2010, 269‐
301.
3,4 John Duns Scotus, Peter
Auriol, Landulfo
Caracciolo
Landulphus criticizes Auriol’s
criticism of Scotus. Edition of
Caracciolo’s II Sent. d. 12

6
22 C “The Legacy of the Bologna studium in Peter Auriol’s
Hylomorphism”, Philosophy and Theology in the Studia
of the Religious Orders and at Papal and Royal Courts, eds.
K. Emery, Jr., W. J. Courtenay and S.M. Metzger,
Turnhout: Brepols, 2012, 277‐302.
3,4 Peter Auriol In reading the Sentences at Paris
after the Council of Vienne,
Peter Auriol incorporated
material from his Bologna
Tractatus de Principiis Physicis,
some parts presented orally in
the classroom and others copied
into the revised text. On his
doctrine of the soul as form of
the body, Auriol understood
that the Council of Vienne
required him to change his
view.
23 A “Peter Auriol the Rhetorician: A Recently Discovered
Treatise on Rhetorical Figures”, Bulletin de Philosophie
Médiévale, 51 (2009), 63‐73.
22 Peter Auriol In a collection of his sermons, a
poor copy of a simplification of
the Rhetorica ad Herennium,
section on rhetorical figures, can
be found.
24 D Edition of Petrus Aureoli, Exornaciones verborum, for
the Peter Auriol Homepage
(http://www.peterauriol.net/auriol‐
pdf/AuriolExornaciones.pdf).
23 Peter Auriol from a single Prague
manuscript
25 C “Pierre de Jean Olivi et l’action instantanée”, Pierre
Jean Olivi ‐ Philosophe et Théologien, eds. Tiziana Suarez‐
Nani, Catherine König‐Pralong and Olivier Ribordy,
Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010, 139‐150.
Peter John Olivi An attempt to bridge
Instantaneous Action and
Synchronic Contingency.
26 C “The Ontological Repercussions of Francis of
Marchia’s Distinction between de possibili and de
inesse”, Contingenza e libertà. Teorie francescane del primo
Trecento, eds. Guido Alliney, Marina Fedeli and
19 Francis of Marchia Connecting objective/subjective
potency with determinatio de
possibili and de inesse.

7
Alessandro Pertosa, Macerata: Edizioni Università di
Macerata, 2012, 177‐201.
26 Y “Francis of Meyronnes”, Encyclopedia of Medieval
Philosophy: Philosophy Between 500 and 1500, ed. Henrik
Lagerlund, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011, 364‐366.
13 Francis of Meyronnes Encyclopedia Entry on Francis,
including some unpublished
material on place and space.
27 C “Francesco dʹAppignano alla ricerca del realismo”, Atti
del V Convegno Internazionale su Francesco d Appignano,
ed. Domenico Priori, Appignano del Tronto, 2011, 61‐
76.
19 Francis of Marchia An attempt to sort out
Marchia’s principia debate.
Emmanuel Babey and Girard Etzkorn (text), Francisci
de Marchia Quaestiones in secundum librum Sententiarum
de Marchia Opera Philosophica et Theologica 2,2)
2010, cii + 314 pp. (ISBN 978 90 5867 847 8).
19 Francis of Marchia.
Radulphus Brito, John
Duns Scotus, Hervaeus
Natalis, Peter Auriol,
Walter Burley, William of
Ockham, Thomas
Aquinas.
Introduction features three case
studies on Francis of Marchia’s
sources: 1. specific unity,
involving Radulphus Brito, John
Duns Scotus, Hervaeus Natalis
and Peter Auriol; 2. The
problem of efficient causality of
substantial forms, involving
Thomas Aquinas, Walter
Burley, and Peter Auriol; 3.
Angelic Speech, involving
Thomas Aquinas, John Duns
Scotus, and William of Ockham.
29 C with Olivier Ribordy, “The Human Soul: Definitions
and Differentiae in Late‐Medieval Sentences
Commentaries”, Philosophical Psychology in Late‐
Medieval Sentences Commentaries, eds. M. Brinzei and
C. Schabel, Turnhout: Brepols, expected 2017.
Pierre d’Ailly, Peter of
Candia, William of
Vaurouillon, Denis the
Carthusian
Some sort of classification of the
positions.
30 C “Faith in Francis Meyronnes’ Commentary on Book III
of the Sentences and in the Tractatus de Virtutibus”,
Fides Virtus . The Virtue of Faith in the Context of the
13 Francis of Meyronnes,
John Duns Scotus
In #13 I screwed up somehow
saying that the Tractatus de
Virtutibus was part of

8
Theological Virtues from the 12th to the Early 16th
Century, eds. Riccardo Quinto, Silvana Vecchio, and
Caterina Tarlazzi, Münster: Aschendorff (Archa Verbi.
Subsidia 12), 2014, 315‐333.
Meyronnes’ Sentences
commentary. Comparison of the
two texts, an introduction to the
Tractatus’ structure and
assessing Meyronnes post‐
Sentences. Looks at how
Meyronnes effectively kills
hope, making it a species of
faith.
31 C “Conversion, Vision and Faith in the Life and Works of
Richard Fitzralph”, Richard Fitzralph: His Life, Times and
Thought, ed. M. Dunne and S. Nolan O.Carm., Dublin:
Four Courts Press, 2013, 103‐127.
1, 11 Richard Fitzralph Argues that Richard Fitzralph’s
conversion away from
Scholasticism was rather his
description of passing from Arts
Master to Theologian. Beatific
Vision in his Sentences
commentary and in his Summa
de Quaestionibus Armenorum.
32 C “The Man in the Middle: Peter Auriol’s Syllogistic
Commentaries on the Gospel of John”, “In principio erat
Verbum”. Philosophy and Theology in the Commentaries on
the Gospel of John (II‐XIV centuries), ed. Fabrizio
Amerini, Münster: Aschendorff (Archa Verbi. Subsidia
11), 2014, 229‐246.
23 Peter Auriol Stegmüller found a John
commentary attributed to
Auriol in an Uppsala
manuscript. A comparison of
style and content with Auriol’s
Compendium on John shows that
both have the same syllogistic
structure, but with different
results.
33 A with Christopher Schabel, “Ni chose, ni‐non chose. The
Sentences Commentary of Himbertus de Garda, OFM”,
Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale, 52 (2011), 149‐232.
30 Francis Meyronnes,
Himbert of Garda, Hugh
of Novocastro, Matteo
Orsini.
Editions of Himbert of Garda, I
Sent. (version A), d.8, q.un., a. 3,
d. 26, aa. 2‐4, Prologus (version
B), q. 1, a. 3, Francis Meyronnes,

9
I Sent. (Reportatio, Ab oriente),
Prologue, q. 1, a. 2; d. 8, pars 2,
aa. 12‐13. Makes some claim
about Himbert as Meyronnes’
secretary, the debate between
Hugh of Novocastro and Matteo
Orsini, a bad joke, and the
revision process of Sentences
commentaries in the Franciscan
convent.
34 E with Michel Balard and Christopher Schabel, Actes de
Famagouste du notaire génois Lamberto di Sambuceto
(décembre 1299‐septembre 1300), Nicosia: Cyprus
Research Centre, 2012 (= Sources et études pour
lʹhistoire de Chypre LXIX), 357 pp. (ISBN 978 9963 0
8129 5).
Lamberto di Sambuceto Desimoni summarized these in
1883 and 1884. His notes in
Revue de l’Orient Latin, t. 2 (1894)
are still valid. The multimillion
euro project, Archivio Storico
Multimediale del Mediterraneo
(ASMM) then linked Desimoni’s
summaries with the images
from the manuscript at about
the same time as the publication
of this volume. The book is still
for sale; the ASMM has since
disappeared without a trace.
35 C “Marginal Realism: Reading the Sentences in the New
Universities”, What’s New in the New European
Universities, ed. E. Jung, Turnhout: Brepols, expected
2017.
18, 19,
28, 36
Francis of Marchia II and III Sentences, mostly from
a manuscript in the Prague
Cathedral library (P). Makes a
claim about the rise of
manuscript culture being linked
to written engagement with the
text, in the margin.

10
Delphine Carron and Girard Etzkorn (text), Francisci de
Marchia Quaestiones in secundum librum Sententiarum
de Marchia Opera Philosophica et Theologica 2,3),
2012, clx + 346 pp. (ISBN 978 90 5867 894 2).
19, 28 Francis of Marchia The introduction first uses a
quantitative analysis to show
(contrary to some claims) that
the edition followed the stemma
proposed in #19. It then
provides a systematic
reassessment of the evidence to
propose a better stemma (which
the edition also follows).
37 C “Destroying the Text: Contemporary Interpretations of
John XXII’s ‘Constitutiones’”, Papst Johannes XXII.
Konzepte und Verfahren seines Pontifikats, ed. H.‐J.
Schmidt and M. Rohde, Berlin: De Gruyter (Scrinium
Friburgense 32), 2014, 37‐70.
5, 6, 7,
16, 17
Peter Auriol, Francis of
Marchia, Gerald Odonis,
Pierre Roger
Clipshow article, trying to show
different strategies theologians
used to deal with John XXII’s
theological Constitutiones. Peter
Auriol adheres under protest,
Francis of Marchia deflates
them, Gerald Odonis upholds
papal authority, and Pierre
Roger (in 1338) gives a perverse
reading of Ad conditorem. This
article would be a lot more fun
if it treated the presentation
copy of Pierre Roger’s lectures
on Cum inter nonnullos given at
the university of Paris
mentioned in #45, n. 8.
38 C “The Souls After Vienne: Franciscan Theologians’
Views on the Plurality of Forms and the Plurality of
Souls, ca. 1315‐30”, Philosophical Psychology and the
Other Disciplines, eds. Paul J.J.M. Bakker, S.W. de Boer
and C. Leijenhorst, Leiden: Brill, 2012, 171‐272.
17, 19,
21, 22,
26, 28,
33, 35
John Duns Scotus, Hugh
of Novocastro, Peter
Auriol, Landulph
Caracciolo, Francis of
Marchia, Francis
Edition (credited to Russ
Friedman and Chris Schabel) of
Gerald Odonis, II Sentences, d.
17, q. un. Russ Friedman gave a
paper “The Soul After Vienne”

11
Meyronnes, Himbert of
Garda, Gerald Odonis
to the conference in Nijmegen in
whose acts this is published,
treating Peter Auriol and Gerald
Odonis’ discussion of the soul
as form of the body with
reference to the Council of
Vienne. In the meantime, I had
published #22, which meant that
the section on Peter Auriol
would have to be rewritten.
Russ asked for help, and I
added a bit until he wanted no
more. On the last revision,
Pasnau’s Metaphysical Themes
came out, which allowed for a
critical foil, so that I could argue
against him that the
Constitution of the Council of
Vienne enacted against Olivi’s
doctrine of the soul did not
necessitate a “sterile
Aristotelianism” by requiring
that the soul be the only
substantial form of human
beings.
39 C “I sermoni principiali di Francesco d’Appignano”, Atti
del VI Convegno Internazionale su Francesco d Appignano,
ed. Domenico Priori, Jesi, AN: Terra dei Fioretti, 2013,
153‐176.
19 Francis of Marchia,
Francis of Meyronnes
Edition of Anonymous
principium in sententias speech
found in Vat. Lat. 869, ff. 211ra‐
211bisva. Falsifies the claim by
Nazareno Mariani that various

12
sermons were given by Francis
of Marchia, discusses principia
speeches on the Sentences. The
speech edited, incidentally, does
not use the Manipulus florum.
40 C “Auctoritates and Aristoteles in Peter Auriol”, Les
Auctoritates Aristotelis, leur utilisation et leur influence
chez les auteurs médiévaux, eds. J. Hamesse and J.
Meirinhos, Turnhout: Brepols 2015 (2017), 155‐185.
3, 4, 22,
23, 38
Peter Auriol Casablanca. Adds to #3‐4 a
study of the Auriol’s Ethics
citations, and explores the
question of commonplaces.
Auriol’s use of Aristotle in his
philosophical works is based
primarily on his reference texts,
with some auctoritates sprinkled
in. On the other hand, his
sermons use Aristotelian
auctoritates (and the Manipulus
florum). Implicit is the
contention that the Auctoritates
Aristotelis is a compilation of
authoritative arguments taken
from 13th‐century works, such
as Bonaventure, which would
explain the contradiction in the
literature on why its ‘influence’
on philosophical thought is
most pronounced in the period
before it was written. The
application of the Auctoritates
was primarily for sermons, as
the 15th‐century introduction to

13
the print edition explains. (n.b.,
I didn’t tell Hoenen that the
introduction was inauthentic)
41 C “Three Franciscan Metaphysicians after Scotus:
Antonius Andreae, Francis of Marchia, and Nicholas
Bonet”, A Companion to the Latin Medieval Commentaries
on Aristotle’s Metaphysics, eds. Fabrizio Amerini and
Gabriele Galluzzo, Leiden: Brill, 2014, 413‐493.
19, 20,
26
John Duns Scotus,
Antonius Andreae,
Francis of Marchia,
Nicholas Bonet
Three sections, one for each
text/author, arranged:
Biography of Author,
explanation of how the text is
arranged (relation between
redactions and types of texts),
illustration of their method by
discussion of a philosophical
theme. Themes discussed:
Antonius Andreae on Matter,
Form and Definition, Francis of
Marchia on Truth (especially
involving the types of mental
and real beings) in the Quodlibet,
I Sent., and Met. questions,
Nicholas Bonet – summary of
contents and on truth.
42 C “Rebuilding the Stemma: Understanding the
Manuscript Tradition of Francis of Marchia’s
Commentaries on Book II of the Sentences”, Durand of
Saint‐Pourçain and his Sentences Commentary: Historical,
Philosophical, and Theological Issues, ed. A. Speer, F.
Retucci, T. Jeschke and G. Guldentops, Leuven: Peeters
(Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales.
Bibliotheca 9), 2014, 119‐169.
19, 28,
36
Francis of Marchia,
William of Brienne,
Pastor of Serrescuderio,
Peter of Allouagne
Begins with a sermon of Peter
Auriol and the problem of
stemmata in critical editions.
Postmortem of the editorial
method developed for Francis of
Marchia Reportatio IIA. Provides
a history of stemmata for the
text, a presentation of the
process by which Francis of
Marchia’s Sentences lectures

14
became Reportatio IIA, with the
problem of reportationes, the
different kinds of contamination
and copying the text endured,
and the final stemma codicum
along with some ideas on
editions of philosophical texts.
43 A “Aristotle in Hell and Aquinas in Heaven: Hugo de
Novocastro, OFM and Durandus de Aureliaco, OP”,
Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale 56 (2014), 183‐193.
47, 50 Hugh of Novocastro.
William of Brienne.
Durandus of Aurillac
(Durandellus)
Argues that Hugh of
Novocastro authored the
question “Utrum Aristoteles sit
salvatus” found in Vat.lat. 1012
on the basis of textual and
doctrinal similarities to Hugh’s
eternity‐of‐the‐world discussion
in his Sentences. Re‐asserts that
Durand of Aurillac is
Durandellus.
44 C “Thomas, Vienne and the Light of Glory as Viewed by
the Summistae”, Summistae. The Commentary Tradition
on Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae (15th‐18th
Century), eds. L. Lanza and M. Toste, expected 2017.
5, 6, 17,
37
Molina, Vázquez, Suárez,
Thomas Aquinas, John
Duns Scotus, Francis of
Marchia, Gerald Odonis
While structuring their
discussion according to
Thomas’ Summa, the Summistae
did not necessarily follow
Thomas’ doctrine. Case in point:
the obligation according to the
Council of Vienne that the souls
be elevated by the Light of
Glory to seeing the divine
essence. The terminology is that
of Thomas, but the authors
explain this case of cognition in
distinctly non‐Thomistic ways.

15
45 C “Bachelors and Masters at Paris in 1319: The lectio
finalis of Landolfo Caracciolo, OFM”, Miscellanea
Mediaevalia 39: Schüler und Meister, eds. A. Speer and T.
Jeschke, 2016, 315‐370.
27, 28,
33, 37,
42
Landolfo Caracciolo,
Matteo Orsini, Benedetto
di Asnago, Annibaldo di
Ceccano, Thomas
Wylton, John of Jandun,
Giovanni Cacantius,
Pierre Roger (Clement
VI), Peter Auriol. With
appearances by Himbert
of Garda, Hugh of
Novocastro, Aufredo
Gonteri Brito and John of
Anneux
Edition of Caracciolo’s Book III,
d. 40 question credited to Chris
Schabel and myself. The Bridge
of San Luis Rey. At the end of
his Sentences lectures, Landolfo
Caracciolo mocked the thought
of a set of his colleagues who
were all noble Italians and none
of whom read the Sentences at
the same time he did. This
article reconstructs their
positions and careers, in the
process noting the revision
process taken in Caracciolo’s
Sentences, in part enabled by a
direct copy of John of Jandun’s
notebook.
46 E with Christopher Schabel, Bullarium Hellenicum: Pope
Honorius III’s Letters to Frankish Greece and
Constantinople, Turnhout: Brepols 2015 (Mediterranean
Nexus 1100‐1700 3), 612 pp. (ISBN 978 2 503 55464 8).
12 Honorius III Honorius III begins his papacy
by crowning a new emperor of
Constantinople, Peter II of
Courtenay. Peter is captured
shortly after arriving in Greece
and is never heard from again.
The empire goes downhill from
there. This edition is the fruit of
a project done in the academic
year 2004‐5, which then
benefited from a decade of
digitalization of early printed
works. Maps by T. Wismann.

16
47 C “Illi sollertissimi philosophi erraverunt in multis: The
Eternity of the World Among Early Scotists, with
Editions of Questions by Hugh of Novocastro and
Landolfo Caracciolo”, Studies in Fourteenth‐Century
Intellectual History in Honor of William J. Courtenay, eds.
W. Duba, R. Friedman, C. Schabel, Leuven: Peeters
(Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales.
Bibliotheca 14), 2017, 145‐255.
38, 43 Bonaventure, Olivi,
Thomas Aquinas, John
Duns Scotus, Henry of
Harclay, William of
Alnwick, Hugh of
Novocastro, Thomas
Wylton, Landolfo
Caracciolo
Editions of Hugh of Novocastro
II Sent., d. 1, qq. 3‐4 and
Landolfo Caracciolo II Sent., d.
1, pars 4, q. 1‐2. Eternity of the
World (EW) debate. Hugh’s text
shows that Harclay, Alnwick,
and Wylton all had the same
source for the opinion of
Thomas and Maimonides. Hugh
interprets Scotus on the EW and
disagrees with him. Landolfo
copies Hugh’s interpretation of
Scotus, but defends Scotus
against Hugh. An appendix
reconstructs the relationship
between the three redactions of
Hugh’s Sentences commentary.
Originally a Freising paper.
48 C with Christopher Schabel, “A Documentary History of
St Theodore Abbey”, A Cistercian Nunnery in the Latin
East: The History and Archaeology of St Theodore Abbey,
Nicosia, Cyprus, eds. M. Olympios and C. Schabel,
expected 2017.
Excavated there in 2004. This is
the introduction to the report.
Addresses the rise of houses of
Cistercian women in general,
the legislation on them, their
spread to the Eastern
Mediterranean and the
circumstances surrounding the
founding of the abbey; Chris
continues with a survey of the
remaining documents on the
abbey’s history.

17
49 A with Christopher Schabel, “Utrum causae secundae
possint nos in aliquo necessitare. Petrus Ceffons vs.
Thomam Bradwardinam”, AIGIS. Electronisk tidsskrift
for klassiske studier i Norden, 15,2 (November 2015),
URL=http://aigis.igl.ku.dk/FSP70/Duba‐Schabel.pdf.
Peter Ceffons. Thomas
Bradwardine.
Edition of a question from
Ceffon’s commentary on book II
of the Sentences (26/51). Danish
translation by T. Wismann.
50 M The Forge of Doctrine: The Academic Year 1330‐31 and the
Rise of Scotism at the University of Paris, Turnhout:
Brepols (Studia Sententiarum 2), XI+444 pp. (In Press)
(ISBN 978 2 503 573274).
28, 40,
42, 43
William of Brienne.
Francis of Meyronnes.
Francis of Marchia. Peter
Auriol. John Duns Scotus.
Durandus of Aurillac
Not much Gerald Odonis,
surprisingly. Editions of some of
Brienne’s lectures, his principia
disputations, his principium in
aula speech, and Francis of
Marchia, IV Sent. q. 23 (on
accidental causality).
51 A “Quasi‐Aristotelians and Proto‐Scotists”, Vivarium 55:1
(special issue on the Limit‐Decision Problem edited by
F. Goubier and M. Roques) (2017), 25 pp.
45, 47 John Duns Scotus, Hugh
of Novocastro, Landolfo
Caracciolo
The hope was to send the
special issue to Synthèse, but
they had some problems with
their special issues. This article
takes the conclusions of #47
concerning the structure of
Hugh of Novocastro’s Sentences
commentaries and their
relationship with Landolfo, and
mixes them with #45’s
assessment of how Landolfo
used the doctrine of
simultaneous contradictories in
the debate with the circle of
Cardinal Stefaneschi. The result
is that the “Quasi Aristotelian”
doctrine that contradictories can
be true at the same temporal

18
instant is not Aristotelian, but is
rather the conscious
development of Scotus’ doctrine
by Hugh of Novocastro, and
Hugh was aware that he was
contradicting Scotus and
Aristotle.
52 C with †Friz S. Pedersen and C. Schabel, “Nos enim
sumus sicut talpae. Pierre Ceffons on the Scientific
Limitations of Cosmology, with His Views on the
Rotation of the Earth and the Plurality of Worlds: II
Sentences, d. 2”, Teologien i historien. Historien i teologien.
Festskrift til professor Lauge O. Nielsen, 2016, 15‐48.
49 Peter Ceffons, Nicole
Oresme
Contains an edition of most of II
Sentences, d. 2, including the
famous allegory of the moles.
53 C with Christopher Schabel, “Francesco d’Appignano
and the Non‐Existent Canon. Tracing Francesco
d’Appignano’s Scientific Legacy in Francesc Marbres,
alias Johannes Canonicus, and Fragments Discovered
Along the Way”, Atti del VII Convegno Internazionale su
Francesco d’Appignano, ed. Domenico Priori,
forthcoming.
19, 28,
36‐42
Francis of Marchia,
Francesc Marbres (John
the Canon)
Framed as a reaction to Bert
Roest’s 2016 Franciscan Studies
proposal to cease critical
editions of the Franciscan
Canon, this article uses the
critical edition of Marchia’s II
Sent. to place in context new
fragments found in binding
waste as well as the reception of
the text in Francesc Marbres’
Physics commentary. Bad canon
jokes.
54 A with C. Schabel, “Remigio, Auriol, Scotus, and the
Myth of the Two‐Year Sentences Lecture at Paris”,
Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales 84
(2017), 143‐179.
42, 45,
50
Remigio de’ Girolami,
Peter Auriol, John Duns
Scotus, Bonaventure,
Thomas Aquinas
Remigio de’ Girolami’s final
speech supports a one‐year
Sentences lecture in 1297‐98 (and
in the order I‐IV‐II‐III). On this
basis, the two major cases for

19
two‐year Sentences lectures in
the early 14th century are
studied, and both are shown to
be without sufficient
foundation.The article ends
with the suggestion that not
even Thomas Aquinas’ case has
been sufficiently shown.
55 C “Franciscan Mixtures: William of Brienne on the
Elements”, La Matière. Nouvelles perspectives de recherche
dans la pensée et la culture médiévales, eds. A. Paravicini‐
Bagliani and T. Suarez‐Nani, Firenze: SISMEL/Edizioni
del Galluzzo (Micrologus Library), forthcoming.
50, 53 William of Brienne. Peter
Auriol. Francis of
Marchia. John Duns
Scotus
With an edition of William of
Brienne’s lectiones 102 and 103,
on elements in mixtures. How a
Scotist puts together Auriol and
Marchia’s criticisms of Scotus
and makes them appear to be
deficient variants of Scotus.
Framed in a discussion about
using medieval “doxographers”
to build histories of
philosophical problems.
56 C “Mathematical and Metaphysical Space in the Early
Fourteenth Century”, Space, Imagination, and the
Cosmos, from Antiquity to the Early Modern Period, eds.
Frederik Bakker, Delphine Bellis, Carla Rita Palmerino,
forthcoming.
41 John Duns Scotus, Peter
Auriol, Nicholas Bonetus
Puts Peter Auriol’s
“metaphysical place” in context
by examining Nicholas Bonetus,
showing that Bonetus takes
Scotus’ doctrine of equivalent
place and uses an Aristotelian
model of abstraction extended
to cover time and space, and
calling this mode
“mathematical” according to a
willful misreading of Averroes.

20
Book Reviews
David N. Bell, The Library of the Abbey of La Trappe. A Study of its History from the Twelfth Century to the French Revolution, with an Annotated Edition
of the 1752 Catalogue, Turnhout: Brepols, 2014, for The Medieval Review 16.05.08 (2016), URL=
https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/tmr/article/view/21941/27891.
Giulio Silano, The Sentences, Books 1‐4, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 2007‐2010, for Speculum 89:1 (2014), 226‐228.
Gilbert Dahan, Nicolas de Lyre. Franciscain du XIVe siècle, exégète et théologien, Turnhout, Brepols, 2011, for Sehepunkte 12 (2012), nr. 12 (December
15, 2012) (URL: http://www.sehepunkte.de/2012/12/21252.html).
William J. Courtenay, Ockham and Ockhamism. Studies in the Dissemination and Impact of his Thought, Leiden, Brill, 2008, for Freiburger Zeitschrift
für Theologie und Philosophie 57:2 (2010), 496‐498.
Collective Volumes
with Russell L. Friedman and Christopher Schabel, Studies in Fourteenth‐Century Intellectual History in Honor of William J. Courtenay, Leuven:
Peeters 2017 (ISBN 978 90‐429‐3393‐4).
with Christopher Schabel, Vivarium 47:2‐3 (2009), special volume on Geraldus Odonis, with Christopher Schabel, also published separately as
Geraldus Odonis, Doctor Moralis and Franciscan Minister General, Leiden: Brill, 2009, 230 pp. (ISBN 978 90 04 17850 2).
E.P. Bos (ed.), with the collaboration of H.A.G. Braakhuis, W. Duba, C.H. Kneepkens, C. Schabel, Medieval Supposition Theory Revisited, Leiden:
Brill 2013, 576 pp. (ISBN 978 9004 2 5983 6). Also published as Vivarium 51:1‐4 (2013).
Translations
From French:
with Christopher Schabel, for Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages, vol. 1: The Thirteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2006):

21
Jacqueline Hamesse, “Theological Quaestiones Quodlibetales”, 17‐48;
Elsa Marmursztejn, “A Normative Power in the Making: Theological Quodlibeta and the Authority of the Masters at Paris at the End of
the Thirteenth Century”, 345‐402;
Jean‐Luc Solère, “Was the Eye in the Tomb? On the Metaphysical and Historical Interest of Some Strange Quodlibetal Questions”, 507‐
558.
Catherine König‐Pralong, “Form/Matter” and “Godfrey of Fontaines”, Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy: Philosophy Between 500 and 1500, ed.
Henrik Lagerlund, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011, pp. 356‐361 and 426‐431.
From German:
with O. Ribordy: Ludwig Hödl, “The Quodlibeta of Master John of Pouilly (+ca. 1328)”, Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages, vol. 2: The
Fourteenth Century, ed. Christopher Schabel, (Leiden: Brill, 2007), 199‐230.
with O. Ribordy: Ludwig Hödl, “The Theologian Henry of Ghent”, A Companion to Henry of Ghent, ed. Gordon A. Wilson, Leiden: Brill, 2010,
pp. 101‐134.
with O. Ribordy: Dagmar Gottschall, “Albert’s Contributions to or Infuence on Vernacular Literatures”, A Companion to Albert the Great, ed.
Irven Resnick, Leiden: Brill, 2012, pp. 723‐757.
Into Italian:
Christopher Schabel, “La virtus derelicta di Francesco dʹAppignano e il contesto del suo sviluppo”, Atti del III Convegno Internazionale su Francesco
d Appignano, ed. Domenico Priori, Appignano del Tronto, 2006, pp. 125‐54.
idem, “La dottrina di Francesco di Marchia sulla predestinazione”; Picenum Seraphicum 20 (2001), 9‐45.
idem, “Il Determinismo di Francesco di Marchia (Parte I)”, Picenum Seraphicum 18 (1999), 57‐95.
idem, “Il Determinismo di Francesco di Marchia (Parte II)”, Picenum Seraphicum 19 (2000), 15‐68.

Annotated Bibliography.Pdf

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Annotated Bibliography.Pdf

Similar to Annotated Bibliography.Pdf (20)

More from Martha Brown

More from Martha Brown (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Annotated Bibliography.Pdf