A Look at Self-Constructed Portal Based Assets, Digitally Based Products and the Potential for Ark Design; consideration of the economic model

1. REAL ‘E’ STATE…
YOUR CLOUD
BASED ASSETS
A SUBSCRIBER BUILDOUT OF SELF-
CONSTRUCTED ASSETS, FINANCIAL
ENGINEERING FOR THE FUTURE OF TECH
EVM? ROI?
FutureValue!
Legacy
ARK
MATRIX
Brij Consulting, LLC
1^2

2. CAPITALIZATION
OF REVENUE
PRODUCING
PORTAL ASSETS
(LEASEHOLD
IMPROVEMENT)
• Section 3350: Internal-use Software
[U.S. GAAP before the Codification]
350-40 Internal-use software
AICPA SOP 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use
1. Three stages to develop software
(1) Preliminary project stage
(2) Application development stage
(3) Post-implementation/operation stage
2. Preliminary project stage
--> Costs are expensed as incurred
3. Application development stage
--> Costs to develop internal-use software
--> during the application development stage
--> are capitalized
4. Post-implementation/operation stage
--> Costs are expensed as incurred
5. Upgrades and enhancements to software
--> Costs may be capitalized
--> if "additional functionality" is added
6. Capitalized software costs
--> are amortized on a "straight line" basis
--> over the estimated useful life
and
--> should be reviewed for impairment
Brij Consulting, LLC
2

3. THE ECONOMIC
MODEL
Variable Rate Demand
is an Economic Model
that is necessary to
divide projects into
their equity bound
components
Variable Rate Demand
is used to create a
product basket and to
determine the
investment
relationship of each
part to the whole
The Economic Model
is both related to the
exterior or market
solution and the
interior developmental
requirement (the
micro economics of
production.)
The Market influence
on the Business Cube
is the valuation Matrix
that needs to be
considered.
Brij Consulting, LLC
3

4. TO GETTO THE ARK THEORY WE HAVETO WORK
BACKWARDS TO THE LEGACY SYSTEM WE HAVE
Brij Consulting, LLC
4
Figures comparable to basic
spending metric

5. SUBSCRIBER ASSETS
Brij Consulting, LLC
5
• All of the subscribers are utilizing
the same market economy and
investing in a type of bond offering
called quantum paper
• Each subscriber is developing his
own product catalogue and asset
production methodology
• The Ark is a hypothetical green
virtual machine (see links)
Ark Subscriber used as relational model here

6. THE ECONOMICS ARE WITHINTHE DESIGN
SPECTRUM
EVM =
CONVERSION
PRODUCT of
1.5803 x 10^6
Brij Consulting, LLC
6
future value rate # periods payments
$1,580,291.62 0.265584 24 1477.34366278692

7. BACKWARD ENGINEERINGTHE ASSET
CONVERSION
• The Ark is taking theTiered components and marrying the Assembly
• But if we go backwards into the Product Components we can see how the Projects were
configured into Instances
• And backwards again to see how the Portfolio arrangement played into the Metrics and
the Funding process
Brij Consulting, LLC
7

8. INTERPOLATION OF PROJECT GROWTH
• The Project/Product has both an interior
and an exterior transition effect on the
Business based on its metric configuration
• The Portfolio vs. Production Metric is the
MAP (metric is 2.25)
• The EVM and the gains in cash and ROC
are sponsoring the Capital Spending to
upgrade the product and or production
mechanics $1.7975 million. $ 444k is the
usual pass thru gain that occurs in the
project dynamic.The sum of 1.7975 plus
.444 = 2.2415 pointing back at the map.
Time and Motion
Transition yields
Conversion or
1.5818 x 10^6
Brij Consulting, LLC
8

9. PROJECT
CONVERSION
• The Project Conversion is a product of the regression or least squares
composition of the Transition
• Assets consist of the Construction in Progress or WIP depending on
the way production is recorded i.e. booked in a financial transaction
• The EVM or EarnedValue Measure that is within the Project Assembly
is generating conversion t/b/a to be applied to capital spending
rate @theta conversion std actual variances passthru volume
1.58 1,000,000.00 1,580,000.00 2,225,239.00 (645,239.00) 444,683.00 (200,556.00)
First Production
cash 1,336,956.38
receivable 2,945,628.09
assets 5,697,692.07
sum 9,980,276.54
payable 1,730,566.71
due owner 2,945,628.09
equity 5,304,081.74
sum 9,980,276.54
Brij Consulting, LLC
9

10. UNITS
CONVERSION
First Production
cash 1,336,956.38
receivable 2,945,628.09
assets 5,697,692.07
sum 9,980,276.54
payable 1,730,566.71
due owner 2,945,628.09
equity 5,304,081.74
sum 9,980,276.54
Brij Consulting, LLC
10
Cap Spending Gain t/b/a
2,945,628.00 dt/df units conversion future gain 1% conv remdr
1,797,500.00 1,730,566.74 66,933.26 62,294.30 4,638.96
4,676,194.74
5,697,692.00 planned spending
1,336,956.38 (1,021,497.26) 315,459.12
future cash 1,300,976.01 382,392.38
279,478.75 102,913.63 205,827.26 201,188.30
200,556.00
other gain 632.30 5,271.26
5,304.08 32.82
5,850,189.00 converted income
4,373,131.00 4,321,660.00 actual income
1,528,529.00 gain 133,563.00 cost conversion
1,580,000.00 (51,471.00) 102,913.63 30,649.37
(28.37) 51,442.63 61,298.74
conversion units 62,294.30 (995.56)
998.00 2.44
(28.37) (4.88)
(33.26) (0.43)
t/b/a: to be applied from slide 8
EVM: expected value measure slide 9
CIP: construction in progress slide 9
WIP: work in progress (can be long term production)
LEGEND:
Binary Principles cause Spending Margin
to double in equity management
402+ meta transition

11. ASSEMBLY UNITS
• ECONOMETRICS use the interior conversion units of a business entity or project to create interior and
exterior conversions in relationship to the production or sales activity in the marketplace. Much like
REAL ESTATE valuation using this kind of interpolation theory allows for the building of assets and the
bifurcation of equity funding between entities or units.
• ECONOMETRICS are also very good valuation objects when interpolating a what if circumstance, a
pricing transition or upgrade related to advanced theory in building or developing software. How will it
impact the growth of the portfolio of assets and what kind of payback can we expect? Are we able to
support this growth with our current customer base or do we need to expand our market?
• ECONOMETRICS are spending metrics that describe the basis of building and the principle of
investment in an equity based portfolio, thus the spending margin is the incumbent building basis.
Brij Consulting, LLC
11

12. ECONOMETRIC MODEL COMPARISON
Brij Consulting, LLC
12
Basic String Model $ ratios
PRICE 131.80 4.55 econometric
SPENDING 28.96 2.52 7.07
MARGIN 102.84 spending margin
Ark Econometric
includes Fulcrum
String Model is the basic model beneath the
Ark principle; see spending margin slide10

13. ECONOMIC MODEL COMPAREDTO META BASIS
Brij Consulting, LLC
13
Meta basis =
string model
All underlying metrics are in conformity

14. META BASED SCORECARD METHOD
Brij Consulting, LLC
14
rate @theta conversion std actual variances passthru volume
1.58 1,000,000.00 1,580,000.00 2,225,239.00 (645,239.00) 444,683.00 (200,556.00)
Cost of Spending is the Leverage
Mechanic for time based investment

15. REAL WORLD EXAMPLE
Brij Consulting, LLC
15
Increment FV of Assets Investment Payback Rate Description
1,670.00 $1,773.11 350 4.52 0.065 capital spending on self-constructed portal assets
719.38 $2,492.48 492 4.52 0.065 capital spending to support all business asset replacements
fulcrum standard 2,389.38 $719.38
0.268 102.84 103.11spending margin
Estimated
Benefit 2.94113
Cost 2.49248
Ratio 1.18
REVENUE EST. SLIDE 16
INTERNAL MARGIN
Asset Value 2,492,480,000
Sales 8,511,997,200
Profit (Loss) 587,327,807
Assets 1,733,110,000
est. liability 71,938,000
Equity 1,661,172,000
Asset Turns 4.91
Margin 7%
ROA 33.9%
Assets/Equity 1.04
ROI 35%
cost benefit 1.18
payback 3.33

16. SPRINT COSTS
Brij Consulting, LLC
16
Sum of Cost Title
Person Assigned Rate Initial Randomization Test Initialize Ark Tier Develop Big Loader Make Product Assembler Configure Machine Proxy Gate Formation Rainbow Bridge Association Grand Total
Analyst 40 268.8
$
268.80
Bridge Specialist 55 1390.4
$
1,390.40
Load Analyst 50 487.5
$
487.50
Load Analyst II 60 315
$
315.00
Load Specialist 65 3022.5
$
3,022.50
Load Specialist II 70 1050
$
1,050.00
Mapper 45 5119.2
$
5,119.20
Product Specialist 50 4000
$
4,000.00
Proxy Analyst 45 135
$
135.00
Proxy Specialist 55 247.5
$
247.50
Tier Analyst 30 907.2
$
907.20
Trainer 50 175
$
175.00
Schema 1 8
$
8.00
Grand Total 8 6026.4 1659.2 4000 3685 382.5 1365
$
17,126.10
Time 8 144 32 80 59.75 7.5 20.25 351.5hours x leveraged rate at distri. Costs
Cost per hour 1.00 41.85 51.85 50.00 61.67 51.00 67.41 48.72 219.25 77,067.45
PRODUCTION EST. REVENUE EST.EXAMPLE
Potential # Sprints

17. LEVERAGE BASIS
Brij Consulting, LLC
17
• Technically string which is at the standard
rate of 4.16 is the initial leverage basis of
the Ark. World Operations are not
generating a revenue production beyond
the level of the conventional binary string
basis. This is the push mechanic.
• The Ark is a Hypothetical String
Production Generator and renewal
production resource in quantum series
generation.
• For more info read at…
https://www.slideshare.net/Marshallja/presentations
1.755 t&m
50.1 push Tesla related
39.7 climb 1.589529312
89.8 157.60 drive
scale
213.9 center
8.987394958 23.8 leverage
10 2.7873286 1.618
89.87394958 250.5082301 1.7227
Technically the
world operates at
push or i^2 +1