This document presents the analysis of non-lifting potential flow past a thin symmetric hydrofoil using a finite difference method. The objectives are to solve the potential flow problem around a 2D hydrofoil and calculate the pressure distribution. A NACA 0012 hydrofoil is used. Governing equations and boundary conditions for the potential flow are described. A structured algebraic grid is used to generate points around the hydrofoil. Finite difference equations are derived and discretized on the grid points. The pressure coefficient is then calculated and compared to experimental results, showing good agreement.
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
Analysis of non-lifting potential flow past a thin symmetric hydrofoil
1. NAME 400
PROJECT AND THESIS
Prepared By:
M. Mashrur Hussain (1312046)
Arafat Zaman(1312049)
Under the Supervision of
Dr. Md. Shahjada Tarafder
Professor,
Department of Naval Architecture & Marine
Engineering,
Bangladesh University of Engineering & Technology
(BUET).
Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh.
5. Objective
To solve non-lifting potential flow problem around
the two-dimensional hydrofoil by using finite
difference method.
To calculate the pressure distribution on the
surface of the 2-D hydrofoil.
To compare the numerical result with the result
available in literature.
6. Mathematical Modeling
Total Velocity :
V = V∞ + 𝛻∅
Where, 𝑉 is the total velocity, 𝑉∞ is the base flow and
∅ is the perturbation potential.
Governing equation:
𝛻2
∅ = 0
11. Boundary Condition at Body Surface
• At the body surface the total velocity is tangential.
So, there is no velocity component along the
normal to the body surface. So,
𝛁∅ 𝐓 ∙ n = Ui + 𝛻∅ ∙ n = 0
15. Discretized Equation at Inner Node
By applying the boundary condition and using the
Laplace equation discretized equation is developed.
Discretized equation for Inner Node:
ao∅o = aE∅E + aW∅W + aN∅N + aS∅S
aE =
1
hE
2
+ hEhW
; aW =
1
hW
2
+ hEhW
; aN =
1
hN
2
+ hNhS
; aS =
1
hS
2
+ hNhS
;
And, ao = aE + aW + aN + aS
16. Discretized Equations at Inflow
Discretized equations for inflow is divided into three
segments. That is,
Bottom corner
Side
Top corner
For Bottom corner, (i=1, j=1)
ao∅o = aE∅E + aN∅N
Where
aE =
1
hE
2
aN =
1
hN
2
ao =
1
hE
2 +
1
hN
2 = aE + aN
17. Discretized Equations at Inflow
For Side (i = 1, j = 2, N − 1 )
ao∅o = aE∅E + aN∅N + aS∅S
Where,
aE =
1
hE
2
aN =
1
hN
2 +hS
2
aS =
1
hN
2 +hS
2
ao = aE + aN + aS
18. Discretized Equations at Inflow
For Top Corner (i = 1, j = N)
ao∅o = aE∅E + aS∅S
Where,
aE =
1
hE
2
aS =
1
hS
2
ao = aE + aS
19. Discretized Equations at Far-field
For Node where i = 2, M − 1 , j = N
ao∅o = aS∅S + aE∅E + aW∅W
Where,
aS =
1
hS
2
aW = aE =
1
hE
2+hW
2
ao = aS + aW + aE
20. Discretized Equations at Outflow
Discretized equations for outflow is also divided into
three segments. That is,
Bottom corner
Side
Top corner
For Bottom corner (i = M, j = 1)
𝑎 𝑜∅ 𝑜 = 𝑎 𝑊∅ 𝑊 + 𝑎 𝑁∅ 𝑁
Where,
𝑎 𝑊 =
1
ℎ 𝑊
2
𝑎 𝑁 =
1
ℎ 𝑁
2
𝑎 𝑜 =
1
ℎ 𝑊
2 +
1
ℎ 𝑁
2 = 𝑎 𝑊 + 𝑎 𝑁
23. Discretized Equation for Symmetry line
Without Body Surface
ao∅o = aN∅N + aE∅E + aW∅W
Where,
aN =
1
hN
2
aE =
1
hE hE+hW
aW =
1
hW hE+hW
ao = aN + aE + aW
24. Discretized Equation on the Body
Surface
∅o
2
hE
2
+ hW
2 +
1
hN
2 =
∅E
hE
2
+ hW
2 +
∅W
hE
2
+ hW
2 +
∅N
hN
2 +
𝐔 𝟏 +
𝐝𝐘
𝐝𝐱
𝐧 𝐱
𝐧 𝐲
𝐡 𝐄 − 𝐡 𝐖
𝐡 𝐄
𝟐
+ 𝐡 𝐖
𝟐 −
𝐡 𝐍 𝐔
𝐝𝐘
𝐝𝐱
𝐡 𝐍
𝟐
ao∅o = aE∅E + aW∅W + aN∅N + S
Where,
aE =
1
hE
2+hW
2 and S =
𝐔 𝟏+
𝐝𝐘
𝐝𝐱
𝐧 𝐱
𝐧 𝐲
𝐡 𝐄−𝐡 𝐖
𝐡 𝐄
𝟐+𝐡 𝐖
𝟐 −
𝐡 𝐍 𝐔
𝐝𝐘
𝐝𝐱
𝐡 𝐍
𝟐
aW =
1
hE
2+hW
2
aN =
1
hN
2
ao = aE + aW + aN
25. Grid Generation
Structured Algebraic H type grid is used. The
advantages are:
Easy to implement
Good efficiency
With a smooth grid transformation, discretization
formulas can be written on the same form as in the
case of rectangular grids.
26. Installing Body Surface in the Grid
The formula for the shape of a NACA 00xx foil, with
“xx” being replaced by the percentage of thickness
to chord is:
Source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NACA_airfoil
yt = 5t 0.2969 x − 0.1260x − 0.3516x2 + 0.2843x3 − 0.1036x4
Where,
x is the position along the chord from 0 to 1.00
yt is the half thickness
t is the maximum thickness
28. Pressure Coefficient
• Matrix A and Matrix B were Created.
• By using matrices solver ∅ values were evaluated.
• Pressure co-efficient was determined by using
the following formula, CP = −
2
V∞
𝜕Φ
𝜕𝑥 𝑦=0
29. Cp vs (X/C)
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
PRESSURECOEFFICIENT,CP
NON DIMENSIONAL X CO-ORDINATE
X/C
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION COMPARISON ON THE THIN-HYDROFOIL
Gregory & O'Reilly Experiment Value Numerical Result
NACA 0012 HYDROFOIL
ANGLE OF ATTACK = 0 DEGREE
30. Discussion
• “The thin airfoil approximation costs you accuracy,
especially near stagnation points. However, when
the geometry is as complicated as it is for real
aircraft, body-conforming meshes are hard to
construct that approximations are sometimes
necessary for the finite-difference method to be
usable. This is the main advantage of the panel
method, its ability to describe accurately flows past
realistic geometries with relative ease.” – Jack
Moran, An Introduction to Theoretical and
Computational Aerodynamics, Page No: 303