SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 35
Download to read offline
1
Spring 2010
Department : Mechanical Engineering, City University of Newyork, Newyork, U.S.A
Course : Adv. Mech. Vibrations: ME I6200 4ST [3223] (CCNY)
Subject : Transverse Vibration of Channel Beams
Instructor : Prof. Benjamin Liaw
Student : Mech. Eng. M. Bariskan
2
THEORETICAL SOLUTION AND STATIC ANALYSES STUDY
OF VIBRATIONS OF CHANNEL BEAMS
Abstract; In this paper, studies of thin-walled channel beams with known cross section area and
length were conducted using certain static analyses and verified with known theoretical
solution. The motion of the system is described by a homogenous set of partial differential
equations. Used; Mathcad to solve roots for natural frequency, Used Euler-Bernoulli Beam
Theoretical equations for equation of motion and Solidworks for certain analyses. The result of
the presented theoretical analyses for Channel beams are compared with result taken from
Solidworks.
Keywords: Transverse Vibration of Beams, Channel Beam , Equation of Motion
3
1.1 Introduction
In this paper the free transverse vibration of beams considered. The equations of motion of a
beam are derived according to the Euler-Bernoulli, Rayleigh, and Timoshenko theories. The
Euler Bernoulli theory neglects the effects of rotary inertia and shear deformation and is
applicable to an analysis of thin beams. The Rayleigh theory considers the effect of rotary
inertia, and the Timoshenko theory considers the effect of both rotary inertia and shear
deformation. The Timoshenko theory can be used for thick beams. The equations of motion for
the transverse vibration of beams are in the form of fourth-order partial differential equations
with two boundary conditions at each end. In this paper; The free vibration solution, including
the determination of natural frequencies and mode shapes, is considered according to Euler-
Bernoulli theory.
1.2 Equation of Motion : Euler- Bernoulli Theory
In the Euler- Bernoulli or thin beam theory, the rotation of cross section of the beam is
neglected compared to the translation. In addition, the angular distortion due to shear is
considered negligible compared to the bending deformation. The thin beam theory is applicable
to beams for which the length is much larger than the depth (at list 10 times), and the
deflection are small compared to the depth. When the transverse displacement of the
centerline of the beam is w, the displacement remain plane and normal to the centerline are
given by figure 1,
4
𝑒 = βˆ’π‘§
πœ•π‘€(π‘₯, 𝑑)
πœ•π‘₯
, 𝑣 = 0, 𝑀 = 𝑀(π‘₯, 𝑑)
where u, v, w denote the components of displacement parallel to x, y, and z directions,
respectively. The components of strain and stress corresponding to this displacement field are
given by
πœ€ π‘₯π‘₯ =
πœ•π‘’
πœ•π‘₯
= βˆ’π‘§
πœ•2
𝑀(π‘₯, 𝑑)
πœ•π‘₯2
, πœ€ 𝑦𝑦 = πœ€ 𝑧𝑧 = πœ€ π‘₯𝑦 = πœ€ 𝑦𝑧 = πœ€ 𝑧π‘₯ = 0
𝜍π‘₯π‘₯ = βˆ’πΈπ‘§
πœ•2
𝑀
πœ•π‘₯2
, πœπ‘¦π‘¦ = πœπ‘§π‘§ = 𝜍π‘₯𝑦 = πœπ‘¦π‘§ = πœπ‘§π‘₯ = 0
And, if we explain the strain energy of the system (Ο€) and Iy=I denotes the area moment of
inertia of the cross section of the beam about the y axis
𝐼 = 𝐼𝑦 = 𝑧2
𝑑𝐴𝐴
,
The kinetic energy of the system (T) , and these are calculated in,
𝑀 = 𝑓𝑀𝑑π‘₯
𝑙
0
The application of the generalized Hamiltons principle gives,
𝛿 πœ‹ βˆ’ 𝑇 βˆ’ π‘Š 𝑑𝑑 = 0 π‘œπ‘Ÿ 𝛿
1
2
𝐸𝐼(
πœ•2 𝑀
πœ•π‘₯2
)2
𝑑π‘₯ + β‹― … . .
𝑙
0
= 0
𝑑2
𝑑1
𝑑2
𝑑1
By setting the expressions are giving by book which is vibration of continuous systems page 320,321
5
We have differential equation of motion for the transverse vibration of the beam as ;
πœ•2
πœ•π‘₯2
𝐸𝐼
πœ•2 𝑀
πœ•π‘₯2
+ 𝜌𝐴
πœ•2 𝑀
πœ•π‘‘2
= 𝑓(π‘₯, 𝑑) (1.1)
And the boundary conditions as
𝐸𝐼
πœ•2 𝑀
πœ•π‘₯2
πœ•π‘€
πœ•π‘₯
𝐼0
𝑙
βˆ’
πœ•
πœ•π‘₯
𝐸𝐼
πœ•2 𝑀
πœ•π‘₯2
𝛿𝑀𝐼0
𝑙
+ π‘˜1 𝑀𝛿𝑀𝐼0 + π‘˜π‘‘1
πœ•π‘€
πœ•π‘₯
𝛿
πœ•π‘€
πœ•π‘₯
𝐼0 + π‘š1
πœ•2 𝑀
πœ•π‘₯2
𝛿𝑀𝐼0 + π‘˜2 𝑀𝛿𝑀𝐼𝑙
+
π‘˜π‘‘2
πœ•π‘€
πœ•π‘₯
𝛿
πœ•π‘€
πœ•π‘₯
𝐼𝑙
+ π‘š2
πœ•2 𝑀
πœ•π‘₯2
𝛿𝑀𝐼𝑙
=0 (1.2)
At x=0,
πœ•π‘€
πœ•π‘₯
=constant (so that 𝛿
πœ•π‘€
πœ•π‘₯
= 0) or βˆ’πΈπΌ
πœ•2 𝑀
πœ•π‘₯2
+ π‘˜π‘‘1
πœ•π‘€
πœ•π‘₯
= 0 (1.3)
w = constant (so that 𝛿𝑀 = 0 ) or (
πœ•
πœ•π‘₯
𝐸𝐼
πœ•2 𝑀
πœ•π‘₯2
+ π‘˜1 𝑀 + π‘š1
πœ•2 𝑀
πœ•π‘₯2
) = 0
At x=l,
πœ•π‘€
πœ•π‘₯
=constant (so that 𝛿
πœ•π‘€
πœ•π‘₯
= 0) or 𝐸𝐼
πœ•2 𝑀
πœ•π‘₯2
+ π‘˜π‘‘2
πœ•π‘€
πœ•π‘₯
= 0 (1.4)
w = constant (so that 𝛿𝑀 = 0 ) or (βˆ’
πœ•
πœ•π‘₯
𝐸𝐼
πœ•2 𝑀
πœ•π‘₯2
+ π‘˜2 𝑀 + π‘š2
πœ•2 𝑀
πœ•π‘₯2
) = 0 (1.5)
1.3 Free Vibration Equations
For free vibration, the external excitation is assumed to be zero :
f(x,t)=0 (1.6)
and hence the equation of motion ,Eq.(1.2), reduces to
πœ•2
πœ•π‘₯2
𝐸𝐼 π‘₯
πœ•2 𝑀 π‘₯,𝑑
πœ•π‘₯2
+ 𝜌𝐴 π‘₯
πœ•2 𝑀 π‘₯,𝑑
πœ•π‘‘2
= 0 (1.7)
For a uniform beam Eq.(1.7) can be expressed as
𝑐2 πœ•4 𝑀
πœ•π‘₯4
(π‘₯, 𝑑) +
πœ•2 𝑀
πœ•π‘‘2
(π‘₯, 𝑑) = 0 (1.8)
𝑐 =
𝐸𝐼
𝜌𝐴
(1.9)
6
1.4 Free Vibration Solution
The free vibration solution can be found using the method of separation of variables as
w(x,t)= W(x)T(t) (1.10)
Using Eq. (1.10) in Eq.(1.8) and rearranging yields,
𝑐2
π‘Š(π‘₯)
𝑑4 π‘Š(π‘₯)
𝑑π‘₯4
= βˆ’
1
𝑇(𝑑)
𝑑2 𝑇(𝑑)
𝑑𝑑2
= a = 𝑀2
(1.11)
where a = 𝑀2
can be shown to be a positive constant Eq. (1.11) can be rewritten as two
equations:
𝑑4 π‘Š(π‘₯)
𝑑π‘₯4
βˆ’ 𝛽4
π‘Š π‘₯ = 0 (1.12)
𝑑2 𝑇(𝑑)
𝑑𝑑2 + 𝑀2
𝑇 𝑑 = 0 (1.13)
where
𝛽4
=
𝑀2
𝑐2
= 𝜌
𝜌𝐴 𝑀2
𝐸𝐼
(1.14)
The solution of Eq.(1.13) is given by
T(t) = A.coswt + B.sinwt
where A and B are constant that can be found from the initial conditions. The solution of equation (1.12)
is assumed to be of exponential form as
π‘Š(π‘₯) = 𝐢𝑒 𝑠π‘₯
(1.15)
Where C and s constants. Substitution of Eq. (1.15) into Eq.(1.12) result in the auxiliary equation
𝑠4
βˆ’ 𝛽4
= 0 (1.16)
The roots of this equation are given by
𝑠1,2 = βˆ“π›½ 𝑠3,4 = βˆ“π‘–π›½ (1.17)
Thus the solution of Eq. (1.12) can be expressed as
π‘Š π‘₯ = 𝐢1 𝑒 𝛽π‘₯
+ 𝐢2 π‘’βˆ’π›½π‘₯
+ 𝐢3 𝑒 𝑖𝛽π‘₯
+ 𝐢4 π‘’βˆ’π‘–π›½π‘₯
(1.18)
where C1, C2, C3 and C4 are constants. Equation (1.18) can be expressed more conveniently as
π‘Š π‘₯ = 𝐢1 π‘π‘œπ‘ π›½π‘₯ + 𝐢2 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽π‘₯ + 𝐢3 π‘π‘œπ‘ β„Žπ›½π‘₯ + 𝐢4 π‘ π‘–π‘›β„Žπ›½π‘₯ (1.19) or,
7
π‘Š π‘₯ = 𝐢1(π‘π‘œπ‘ π›½π‘₯ + π‘π‘œπ‘ β„Žπ›½π‘₯) + 𝐢2 π‘π‘œπ‘ π›½π‘₯ βˆ’ π‘π‘œπ‘ β„Žπ›½π‘₯ + 𝐢3 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽π‘₯ + π‘ π‘–π‘›β„Žπ›½π‘₯ + 𝐢4(𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽π‘₯ βˆ’ π‘ π‘–π‘›β„Žπ›½π‘₯) (1.20)
where C1, C2, C3 and C4 are different constants in each case. The natural frequencies of the beam can
be determined of Eq. (1.14) as
𝑀 = 𝛽2 𝐸𝐼
𝜌𝐴
= (𝛽𝑙)2 𝐸𝐼
𝜌𝐴 𝑙4 (1.21)
The function W(x) is known as the normal mode or characteristic function of the beam and w is called
the natural frequency of vibration . For any beam, there will be infinite number of normal modes with
one natural frequency associated with each normal mode. The unknown constant C1, C2, C3, C4 in Eq.
(1.19) or Eq. (1.20) and the value of Ξ² in Eq. (1.21) can be determined from the known boundary
conditions of the beam.
8
1.5 Frequencies and mode shapes of uniform beams
The natural frequencies and mode shapes of beams with a uniform cross section with different
boundary conditions are considered in this section. We can find boundary conditions from given tables
in the textbook. Also Is listed below
9
1.5.1 Beam Simply Supported at Both Ends
The transverse displacement and the bending moment are zero at the both ends. Hence boundary
conditions can be started as:
(1.22)
or
πœ•2 π‘Š
πœ•π‘₯2
(0) = 0 (1.23)
(1.24)
or
πœ•2 π‘Š
πœ•π‘₯2
(𝑙) = 0 (1.25)
When used In the solution of Eq. (1.20), Eq.(1.22) and (1.23) yield
C1=C2=0 (1.26)
10
(1.26)
(1.27)
(1.28)
These equations denote a system of two equations in the two unknowns and . For a nontrivial
solution of and , the determinant of the coefficients must be equal to zero. This leads to
or
(1.29)
It can be observed that is not equal to zero unless =0. The value of =0 need not be
considered because it implies, according to equation;
=0, which corresponds to the beam at rest. Thus, the frequency equations becomes
(1.30)
The roots of the equations, , are given by
, (1.31)
And hence the natural frequencies of vibration become
=𝑛2
πœ‹2
(
𝐸𝐼
𝜌𝐴 𝑙4)1/2
, n=1,2,…….. (1.32)
11
We are going to find reaction force, moment maximum, stress, deflection and strain magnitude for this
C-beam and natural frequencies of vibration of a channel beam
(material stainless steel AISI 304) 3 m long,0.03 thick and dimensions 0.15 m, 0.25 m respectively. As
shown figure,
Figure1 : C-beam Main Dimension
And the specifications for this material: AISI 304 Stainless Steel
Elastic Modulus (E) : 190*109
Pa,
Density (ρ) : 8000 kg / m3 =8000*9.81 =78480 N/m3
=78.4 kN/m3
Area (A) :2*( 0.15*0.03) + (0.19*0.03) = 0.0147 m2
𝐼𝑧 β‰ˆ
2
3
π‘Ž3
𝑑 + 2π‘Ž2
𝑏𝑑 = 0.000126723 m4
from textbook equation
Volume per meter = 0.0147 m3 Total V= 0.0441m3 mass=rho*V*g(9.81 m/sn2)=3460.9 N
12
Firstly, We are going to find reaction force, moment, stress, deflection, and strain magnitude to
compare static analyses both, theoretical and Solidworks result then mod shapes and Natural
frequencies is calculated and compared on same way.
Figure-2-Free Body Diagram –Simply Supported Beam
For simply supported both ends
𝐹𝑦 = 0 βˆ’ π‘ž + π‘‰π‘Ž + 𝑉𝑏 = 0
𝑀𝑏 = 0 3. π‘‰π‘Ž βˆ’ 1.5π‘ž = 0 π‘ž = 1153 𝑁 π‘Š = 3 βˆ— 1153 = 3460.9𝑁
Va = 1730N =Vb
Figure – 3 Reaction Force for Simply-supported at both ends (Solidworks 2008)
And Plotting the shear force and Bending moment diagram below:
13
Figure-4 Shear Force and Moment Diagrams for Simply Supported Both Ends
Moment max : 1730*1.5/2 = 1297.5 N.m
𝜍π‘₯π‘₯ =
𝑀𝑧.𝑦
𝐼𝑧𝑧
=
1297.5βˆ—0.125
0.000126723
= 0.127 Mpa
Figure-5 Stress (normal stress) for z direction
Equation of deflection for simply supported ends
𝛿 =
βˆ’5. 𝑀. 𝐿4
384. 𝐸. 𝐼
=
βˆ’5.1153.6 βˆ— 34
384.190 βˆ— 109
βˆ— 0.000126723
= βˆ’0.000051 = 5.1 βˆ— 10βˆ’5
π‘š
14
Figure- 6 Deflection on The Simply Supported beam ( Solidworks)
Mode shapes and Natural Frequencies for Simply Supported Both End
Figure-7 Natural frequencies and mode shapes of a beam simply supported beam.
,
For n 𝜷 𝟏 𝒍 = πŸ‘. πŸπŸ’πŸπŸ” 𝜷 𝟐 𝒍 = πŸ”. πŸπŸ–πŸ‘πŸ 𝜷 πŸ‘ 𝒍 = πŸ—. πŸ’πŸπŸ’πŸ– 𝜷 πŸ’ 𝒍 = πŸ—. πŸ’πŸπŸ’πŸ–
Equations Euler-Bernoulli calculated in MathCAD , results are in the units : rad/sc simply supported at
both ends
15
n=1
193 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
3.1416
2
οƒ— 159.562ο€½
n=2
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
6.2832
2
οƒ— 633.268ο€½
n=3
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
9.4248
2
οƒ— 1.425 10
3
ο‚΄ο€½
n=4
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
12.5664
2
οƒ— 2.533 10
3
ο‚΄ο€½
n=5
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
15.708
2
οƒ— 3.958 10
3
ο‚΄ο€½
And From Solidworks Result we have,
1:39 Monday April 05 2010
Study name:
Study 2
Mode No. Frequency(Rad/sec) Frequency(Hertz) Period(Seconds)
1 311.23 49.534 0.020188
2 454.9 72.4 0.013812
3 714.83 113.77 0.0087898
4 746.45 118.8 0.0084175
5 1181 187.96 0.0053202
6 1382.9 220.09 0.0045436
7 1546.3 246.11 0.0040633
8 2152.4 342.57 0.0029191
9 2305.5 366.94 0.0027253
10 2702.4 430.1 0.002325
11 3311.2 526.99 0.0018976
12 3875.2 616.75 0.0016214
13 4076.8 648.84 0.0015412
14 4082.5 649.75 0.001539
15 4154.1 661.15 0.0015125
16 4309.1 685.81 0.0014581
17 4569.9 727.32 0.0013749
18 4900.2 779.89 0.0012822
19 4969.3 790.89 0.0012644
20 5185 825.21 0.0012118
16
Solidworks = 454 Rd/sc
Theoretical= 633 Rd/sc
Error = %12
Mode shape = 1
Figure-8 Mode Shape 1 For S.S Both Ends
Solidworks = 1328 Rd/sc
Theoretical= 1425 Rd/sc
Error = %7
Mode shape = 2
Figure-9 Mode Shape 2 For S.S Both Ends
Solidworks = 2305 Rd/sc
Theoretical= 2533 Rd/sc
Error = %9
Mode shape = 3
Figure-10 Mode Shape 3 For S.S Both Ends
Solidworks = 3875 Rd/sc
Theoretical= 3958 Rd/sc
Error = % 2
Mode shape = 4
Figure-11 Mode Shape 4 For S.S Both Ends
17
1.5.2 Beam Fixed-fixed Ends
We are going to find reaction force, moment, stress, deflection, and strain magnitude to compare static
analyses both, theoretical and Solidworks result then mod shapes and Natural frequencies is calculated
and compared on same way. For fixed-fixed beams
Figure-12-Free Body Diagram –Fixed-fixed Beam
For fixed-fixed supported both ends
𝐹𝑦 = 0 βˆ’ π‘ž + π‘‰π‘Ž + 𝑉𝑏 = 0
𝑀𝑏 = 0 3. π‘‰π‘Ž βˆ’ 1.5π‘ž = 0 π‘ž = 1153 𝑁 π‘Š = 3 βˆ— 1153 = 3460.9𝑁
Va = 1730N =Vb
And Plotting the shear force and Bending moment diagram below:
Figure-13 Shear Force and Moment Diagrams for Fixed-fixed Beam
18
Moment max= (1153*32
/12)+(1730*1.5/2)=2162.25 N.m
𝜍π‘₯π‘₯ =
𝑀𝑧.𝑦
𝐼𝑧𝑧
=
2162.25βˆ—0.125
0.000126723
= 2.13 Mpa
Figure-14 Stress (normal stress) for z direction
Equation of deflection for fixed-fixed ends
𝛿 =
βˆ’π‘€. 𝐿4
384. 𝐸. 𝐼
=
1153.6 βˆ— 34
384.190 βˆ— 109
βˆ— 0.000126723
= βˆ’0.0000101 = 1.01 βˆ— 10βˆ’5
π‘š
Figure- 15 Deflection on The Fixed-fixed beam ( Solidworks)
19
Mode shapes and Natural Frequencies for Fixed-Fixed Both End
Figure-16 Natural frequencies and mode shapes of a beam fixed-fixed end
Natural frequencies and mode shapes of a beam simply supported at both ends.
, 𝛽𝑛 𝑙 β‰… 2𝑛 + 1 πœ‹/2
For n 𝛽1 𝑙 = 4.73 𝛽2 𝑙 = 7.8532 𝛽3 𝑙 = 10.996 𝛽4 𝑙 = 14.731
Equations Euler-Bernoulli calculated in Mathcad, results are in the units : rad/sc simply supported at
both ends
20
n=1
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
4.73
2
οƒ— 358.879ο€½
n=2
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
7.8532
2
οƒ— 989.279ο€½
n=3
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
10.9956
2
οƒ— 1.939 10
3
ο‚΄ο€½
n=4
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
14.1372
2
οƒ— 3.206 10
3
ο‚΄ο€½
n=5
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
17.2788
2
οƒ— 4.789 10
3
ο‚΄ο€½
n=6
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
20.4204
2
οƒ— 6.689 10
3
ο‚΄ο€½
9:59 Monday April 05 2010
Study name: Fixed-
Fixed
Mode No. Frequency(Rad/sec) Frequency(Hertz) Period(Seconds)
1 530.96 84.504 0.011834
2 543.06 86.431 0.01157
3 1265.1 201.34 0.0049667
4 1366.7 217.52 0.0045973
5 1408.6 224.18 0.0044606
6 2208.6 351.51 0.0028449
7 2624.5 417.7 0.0023941
8 3208.8 510.7 0.0019581
9 3333.9 530.61 0.0018846
10 4036.4 642.41 0.0015566
11 4090.4 651.01 0.0015361
12 4321.9 687.85 0.0014538
13 4562.4 726.12 0.0013772
14 4686.2 745.83 0.0013408
15 5114 813.92 0.0012286
16 5251 835.73 0.0011966
17 5299 843.36 0.0011857
18 5380.8 856.39 0.0011677
19 5797.8 922.75 0.0010837
20 6137.6 976.84 0.0010237
21
Solidworks= 530.96 rd/sc
Therotical= 358.59 rd/sc
Error = %48
Mode=1
Figure-17 Mode Shape 1 for F-F Both Ends
Solidworks= 1265.61 rd/sc
Therotical= 989.2 rd/sc
Error = %27
Mode=2
Figure-18 Mode Shape 2 for F-F Both Ends
Solidworks= 2208.6 rd/sc
Theoretical= 1938.6 rd/sc
Error = %12
Mode=3
Figure-19 Mode Shape 3 for F-F Both Ends
Solidworks= 3206 rd/sc
Therotical= 3208 rd/sc
Error = %01
Mode=4
Figure-20 Mode Shape 4 For F-F Both Ends
22
1.5.3 Beam Fixed-Simply Supported Ends
Thirdly, We are going to find reaction force, moment, stress, deflection, and strain magnitude to
compare static analyses both, theoretical and Solidworks result then mod shapes and Natural
frequencies is calculated and compared on same way. For Fixed-Simply Supported
Figure-21-Free Body Diagram –Fixed-Simply Supported Beam
V(z)= - 1/8 * w *(5L-8x)
Vmax= Vz=0 Va = - 5Lw/8 Vb=3Lw/8
Va= - 5*3*1153/8 = 2161.8 N Vb= 1297.125 N
Figure-22 Shear Force and Moment Diagrams for Fixed-Simply Supported Beam
And Moment for any point of beam
𝑀𝑏 = 𝑀. π‘₯
3𝐿
8
βˆ’
π‘₯
2
π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘€π‘Žπ‘₯ π‘€π‘œπ‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘Žπ‘‘
3
8
𝐿 𝑀𝑏 =
9
128
𝑀𝐿2
= 729 𝑁
23
𝑀 π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ =
1
8
𝑀𝐿2
= 1297 𝑁. π‘š
𝜍π‘₯π‘₯ =
𝑀𝑧.𝑦
𝐼𝑧𝑧
=
1297βˆ—0.125
0.000126723
= 1.27 Mpa
Figure-23 Stress (normal stress) for z direction
Equation of deflection for simplysupport-fixed ends At x=0.4215l
𝛿 =
βˆ’π‘€. 𝐿4
185. 𝐸. 𝐼
= βˆ’
1153.6 βˆ— 34
185.190 βˆ— 109
βˆ— 0.000126723
= βˆ’0.0000209 = 2.09 βˆ— 10βˆ’5
π‘š
Figure- 24 Deflection on The Fixed-Simply Supported beam ( Solidworks)
24
Mode shapes and Natural Frequencies for Simply supported-Fixed End
Figure-25 Natural frequencies and mode shapes of a beam simply supported-fixed end
, 𝛽𝑛 𝑙 β‰… 4𝑛 + 1 πœ‹/4
For n 𝛽1 𝑙 = 3.9266 𝛽2 𝑙 = 7.06686 𝛽3 𝑙 = 10.212 𝛽4 𝑙 = 13.3518
Equations Euler-Bernoulli calculated in Mathcad, results are in the units : rad/sc simply supported –
fixed ends.
25
n=1
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
3.9266
2
οƒ— 247.32ο€½
n=2
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
7.0686
2
οƒ— 801.479ο€½
n=3
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
10.2102
2
οƒ— 1.672 10
3
ο‚΄ο€½
n=4
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
13.3518
2
οƒ— 2.86 10
3
ο‚΄ο€½
16:21 Monday April 05 2010
Study name:
Study 2
Mode No. Frequency(Rad/sec) Frequency(Hertz) Period(Seconds)
1 399.57 63.594 0.015725
2 486.22 77.384 0.012923
3 817.66 130.13 0.0076843
4 1101.4 175.29 0.0057047
5 1277.1 203.25 0.0049201
6 1597.5 254.25 0.0039332
7 2157.2 343.33 0.0029126
8 2570.3 409.08 0.0024445
9 2862 455.51 0.0021954
10 3345.3 532.42 0.0018782
11 4010.5 638.29 0.0015667
12 4030.2 641.42 0.001559
13 4103.5 653.1 0.0015312
14 4302.6 684.79 0.0014603
15 4479.7 712.96 0.0014026
16 4632.1 737.22 0.0013564
17 5016.4 798.38 0.0012525
18 5219.9 830.76 0.0012037
19 5331 848.45 0.0011786
20 5665.7 901.73 0.001109
26
Solidworks = 399 rd/sc
Theoretical = 247 rd/sc
Error = %61
Mode = 1
Figure-26 Mode Shape 1 for F-S Ends
Solidworks = 801 rd/sc
Theoretical = 817 rd/sc
Error = %2
Mode =2
Figure-27 Mode Shape 2 for F-S Ends
Solidworks 1597rd/sc
Theoretical = 1672 Rd/sc
Error = % 4
Mode = 3
Figure-28 Mode Shape 3 for F-S Ends
Solidworks = 2862 rd/sc
Theoretical = 2860 rd/sc
Error = %0.01
Figure-29 Mode Shape 4 for F-S Ends
27
1.5.4 Beam Fixed-Free Ends (Cantilever Beam)
Fourtly, We are going to find reaction force, moment, stress, deflection, and strain magnitude to
compare static analyses both, theoretical and Solidworks result then mod shapes and Natural
frequencies is calculated and compared on same way. For Cantilever Beams
Figure-30-Free Body Diagram –Cantilever Beam
For simply supported-fixed ends
V(b)= - w.l
Vmax= -1153*3 = 3460.9 N
Figure-31 Shear Force and Moment Diagrams for Cantilever Beam
28
And Moment for any point of beam
𝑀 =
𝑀π‘₯2
2
π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘€π‘Žπ‘₯ π‘€π‘œπ‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ 𝑀 π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ =
𝑀𝑙2
2
=
1153 βˆ— 9
2
= 5188 𝑁. π‘š
𝜍π‘₯π‘₯ =
𝑀𝑧.𝑦
𝐼𝑧𝑧
=
5188βˆ—0.125
0.000126723
= 5.117 Mpa
Figure-32 Stress (normal stress) for z direction
Equation of deflection for fixed-free ends At free ends
𝛿 =
βˆ’π‘€. 𝐿4
8. 𝐸. 𝐼
= βˆ’
1153.6 βˆ— 34
8.190 βˆ— 109
βˆ— 0.000126723
= βˆ’0.000485111 = 4.85 βˆ— 10βˆ’4
π‘š
Figure- 33 Deflection on The Cantilever Beam ( Solidworks)
29
Mode shapes and Natural Frequencies for Fixed-Free (Cantilever Beams)
Figure-34 Natural frequencies and mode shapes of a cantilever beam
, 𝛽𝑛 𝑙 β‰… 2𝑛 βˆ’ 1 πœ‹/2
For n 𝛽1 𝑙 = 1.8751 𝛽2 𝑙 = 4.6941 𝛽3 𝑙 = 7.8547 𝛽4 𝑙 = 10.9956
Equations Euler-Bernoulli calculated in Mathcad, results are in the units : rad/sc fixed-free ends
30
n=1
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
1.8751
2
οƒ— 56.399ο€½
n=2
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
4.6941
2
οƒ— 353.452ο€½
n=3
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
7.8547
2
οƒ— 989.657ο€½
n=4
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
10.9956
2
οƒ— 1.939 10
3
ο‚΄ο€½
18:33 Monday April 05 2010
Study name:
Study 2
Mode No. Frequency(Rad/sec) Frequency(Hertz) Period(Seconds)
1 85.685 13.637 0.073329
2 154.42 24.576 0.04069
3 345.67 55.015 0.018177
4 526.33 83.767 0.011938
5 696.91 110.92 0.0090158
6 1348.4 214.6 0.0046598
7 1427.8 227.24 0.0044006
8 1538.4 244.84 0.0040843
9 2347.7 373.65 0.0026763
10 2554.8 406.61 0.0024594
11 2671 425.11 0.0023523
12 3383.2 538.45 0.0018572
13 3497.6 556.67 0.0017964
14 4044.3 643.66 0.0015536
15 4130.6 657.41 0.0015211
16 4198.3 668.18 0.0014966
17 4482.7 713.45 0.0014016
18 4732.1 753.13 0.0013278
19 4919.5 782.96 0.0012772
20 5372.7 855.09 0.0011695
31
Solidworks = 85.65 Rd /sc
Theoretical = 56.39 Rd/sc
Error = %51
Mode=1
Figure-35 Mode Shape 1 for Fixed-Free Ends
Solidworks = 345.67 Rd/sc
Theoretical = 353.45
Error = %3
Mode=2
Figure-36 Mode Shape 2 for Fixed-Free Ends
Solidworks = 989 Rd/sc
Theoretical = 1248.94 Rd/sc
Error= %26
Mode=3
Figure-37 Mode Shape 3 for Fixed-Free Ends
Solidworks = 2347 Rd/sc
Theoretical = 1939.49 Rd/sc
Error = %21
Mode=4
Figure-38 Mode Shape 4 for Fixed-Free Ends
32
1.5.5 Beam free-Free Ends
Finally, We are going to find reaction force, moment, stress, deflection, and strain magnitude to
compare static analyses both, theoretical and Solidworks result then mod shapes and Natural
frequencies is calculated and compared on same way. For Free-Free Beam
Figure-39 Natural frequencies and mode shapes of a Free-Free Beam
, 𝛽𝑛 𝑙 β‰… 2𝑛 βˆ’ 1 πœ‹/2
For n 𝛽1 𝑙 = 4.7300 𝛽2 𝑙 = 7.8532 𝛽3 𝑙 = 10.9965 𝛽4 𝑙 = 14.372
We don’t have any reaction force ;
I listed below mode shapes and natural frequencies ,
33
n=2
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
7.8532
2
οƒ— 989.279ο€½
n=3
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
10.9956
2
οƒ— 1.939 10
3
ο‚΄ο€½
n=4
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
14.1372
2
οƒ— 3.206 10
3
ο‚΄ο€½
n=5
190 10
9
ο‚΄ 0.000129 
80 10
3
ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3
4
 

οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ


οƒͺ
οƒͺ

οƒΉ
οƒΊ
οƒΊ

0.5
17.2788
2
οƒ— 4.789 10
3
ο‚΄ο€½
22:16 Monday April 05 2010
Study name:
Study 2
Mode No. Frequency(Rad/sec) Frequency(Hertz) Period(Seconds)
1 0 0 1.00E+32
2 0 0 1.00E+32
3 0 0 1.00E+32
4 0.00067445 0.00010734 9316
5 0.0011889 0.00018922 5284.8
6 0.0015522 0.00024704 4048
7 538.93 85.773 0.011659
8 553.57 88.103 0.01135
9 787.16 125.28 0.0079821
10 1445.4 230.05 0.0043469
11 1542.2 245.45 0.0040741
12 1634.6 260.16 0.0038438
13 2488.3 396.02 0.0025251
14 2717.4 432.48 0.0023122
15 3534 562.45 0.0017779
16 3676.2 585.09 0.0017091
17 4028.3 641.13 0.0015597
18 4091.8 651.23 0.0015356
19 4222.8 672.08 0.0014879
20 4301.4 684.58 0.0014607
21 4647.6 739.69 0.0013519
22 4889.3 778.16 0.0012851
23 5088.4 809.85 0.0012348
34
Solidworks = 0 rd/sc
Theoretical = 0 Rd/sc
Error = 0
Mode = 0
Figure : 40 Mode Shape 0 for Free-Free Ends
Solidworks = 787.16
Theoretical = 989 Rd/sc
Error = % 25
Mode = 1
Figure : 41 Mode Shape 1 for Free-Free Ends
Solidworks = 1634 Rd/sc
Theoretical = 1939 Rd/sc
Error = %18
Mode2
Figure : 41 Mode Shape 2 for Free-Free Ends
Solidworks = 2488 Rd/sc
Theoretical = 3206 Rd/sc
Error = %28
Mode = 3
Figure : 42 Mode Shape 3 for Free-Free Ends
Solidworks = 4028 Rd/sc
Theoretical = 4728 Rd/sc
Error = %17 Mode = 4
35
REFERENCES
1. 1. S.S. Rao, Vibration of Continuous Systems, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2007.
2. 2. http://www.me.berkeley.edu/~lwlin/me128/formula.pdf
3. 3. http://www.awc.org/pdf/DA6-BeamFormulas.pdf
4. 4. https://ecourses.ou.edu/cgi-bin/ebook.cgi?doc=&topic=me&chap_sec=fixed&page
5. =&appendix=beams
6. 5. BEAM FORMULAS WITH SHEAR AND MOMENTDIAGRAMS Copyright Β© 2007 American Forest &
7. Paper Association, Inc.
6. VIBRATION PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING TIMOSHENKO SECOND EDITIONFIFTH PRINTING
8.

More Related Content

What's hot

Forced vibrations unit 4
Forced vibrations unit 4Forced vibrations unit 4
Forced vibrations unit 4M.D.Raj Kamal
Β 
Fundamentals of vibration
Fundamentals of vibrationFundamentals of vibration
Fundamentals of vibrationshubham chaurasiya
Β 
Vibration and damping
Vibration and dampingVibration and damping
Vibration and dampingDivya Lattoo
Β 
Lateral or transverse vibration of thin beam
Lateral or transverse vibration of thin beamLateral or transverse vibration of thin beam
Lateral or transverse vibration of thin beamM. Ahmad
Β 
presentation on free and forced vibration
presentation on free and forced vibrationpresentation on free and forced vibration
presentation on free and forced vibrationRakshit vadi
Β 
Chapter 4: Torsion
Chapter 4: TorsionChapter 4: Torsion
Chapter 4: TorsionMonark Sutariya
Β 
Vibration of Continuous Structures
Vibration of Continuous StructuresVibration of Continuous Structures
Vibration of Continuous StructuresMohammad Tawfik
Β 
1 introduction to mechanical vibrations (eng. ahmed abd el aleem amin)
1     introduction to mechanical vibrations (eng. ahmed abd el aleem amin)1     introduction to mechanical vibrations (eng. ahmed abd el aleem amin)
1 introduction to mechanical vibrations (eng. ahmed abd el aleem amin)Ahmed Abdel-Aleem
Β 
9 beam deflection
9 beam deflection9 beam deflection
9 beam deflectionMohamed Yaser
Β 
Engineering Vibration 4th Edition Inman Solutions Manual
Engineering Vibration 4th Edition Inman Solutions ManualEngineering Vibration 4th Edition Inman Solutions Manual
Engineering Vibration 4th Edition Inman Solutions Manualrularezevu
Β 
Dynamic response to harmonic excitation
Dynamic response to harmonic excitationDynamic response to harmonic excitation
Dynamic response to harmonic excitationUniversity of Glasgow
Β 
Introduction to Mechanical Vibration.pptx
Introduction to Mechanical Vibration.pptxIntroduction to Mechanical Vibration.pptx
Introduction to Mechanical Vibration.pptxAbdelrahmanMahmoud836077
Β 
Strong form and weak form explanation through examples of a bar(en no 19565...
Strong form and weak form   explanation through examples of a bar(en no 19565...Strong form and weak form   explanation through examples of a bar(en no 19565...
Strong form and weak form explanation through examples of a bar(en no 19565...Dhamu Vankar
Β 
Equations of motion normal & tangential
Equations of motion  normal & tangentialEquations of motion  normal & tangential
Equations of motion normal & tangentialGrace Palermo
Β 
engineering statics: distributed forces-1
engineering statics: distributed forces-1engineering statics: distributed forces-1
engineering statics: distributed forces-1musadoto
Β 
Fundamentals of vibration
Fundamentals of vibrationFundamentals of vibration
Fundamentals of vibrationAshish Gupta
Β 
Bending stress and shear stress for Asymmetric I-Section.
Bending stress and shear stress for Asymmetric  I-Section.Bending stress and shear stress for Asymmetric  I-Section.
Bending stress and shear stress for Asymmetric I-Section.Dr.Abhinav .
Β 
Solution Manul for Structural Analysis in SI Units 10th Edition by Russell Hi...
Solution Manul for Structural Analysis in SI Units 10th Edition by Russell Hi...Solution Manul for Structural Analysis in SI Units 10th Edition by Russell Hi...
Solution Manul for Structural Analysis in SI Units 10th Edition by Russell Hi...physicsbook
Β 
Chapter 1: Stress, Axial Loads and Safety Concepts
Chapter 1: Stress, Axial Loads and Safety ConceptsChapter 1: Stress, Axial Loads and Safety Concepts
Chapter 1: Stress, Axial Loads and Safety ConceptsMonark Sutariya
Β 

What's hot (20)

Forced vibrations unit 4
Forced vibrations unit 4Forced vibrations unit 4
Forced vibrations unit 4
Β 
Fundamentals of vibration
Fundamentals of vibrationFundamentals of vibration
Fundamentals of vibration
Β 
Vibration and damping
Vibration and dampingVibration and damping
Vibration and damping
Β 
Lateral or transverse vibration of thin beam
Lateral or transverse vibration of thin beamLateral or transverse vibration of thin beam
Lateral or transverse vibration of thin beam
Β 
presentation on free and forced vibration
presentation on free and forced vibrationpresentation on free and forced vibration
presentation on free and forced vibration
Β 
Chapter 4: Torsion
Chapter 4: TorsionChapter 4: Torsion
Chapter 4: Torsion
Β 
Vibration of Continuous Structures
Vibration of Continuous StructuresVibration of Continuous Structures
Vibration of Continuous Structures
Β 
1 introduction to mechanical vibrations (eng. ahmed abd el aleem amin)
1     introduction to mechanical vibrations (eng. ahmed abd el aleem amin)1     introduction to mechanical vibrations (eng. ahmed abd el aleem amin)
1 introduction to mechanical vibrations (eng. ahmed abd el aleem amin)
Β 
9 beam deflection
9 beam deflection9 beam deflection
9 beam deflection
Β 
Structures and Materials- Section 8 Statically Indeterminate Structures
Structures and Materials- Section 8 Statically Indeterminate StructuresStructures and Materials- Section 8 Statically Indeterminate Structures
Structures and Materials- Section 8 Statically Indeterminate Structures
Β 
Engineering Vibration 4th Edition Inman Solutions Manual
Engineering Vibration 4th Edition Inman Solutions ManualEngineering Vibration 4th Edition Inman Solutions Manual
Engineering Vibration 4th Edition Inman Solutions Manual
Β 
Dynamic response to harmonic excitation
Dynamic response to harmonic excitationDynamic response to harmonic excitation
Dynamic response to harmonic excitation
Β 
Introduction to Mechanical Vibration.pptx
Introduction to Mechanical Vibration.pptxIntroduction to Mechanical Vibration.pptx
Introduction to Mechanical Vibration.pptx
Β 
Strong form and weak form explanation through examples of a bar(en no 19565...
Strong form and weak form   explanation through examples of a bar(en no 19565...Strong form and weak form   explanation through examples of a bar(en no 19565...
Strong form and weak form explanation through examples of a bar(en no 19565...
Β 
Equations of motion normal & tangential
Equations of motion  normal & tangentialEquations of motion  normal & tangential
Equations of motion normal & tangential
Β 
engineering statics: distributed forces-1
engineering statics: distributed forces-1engineering statics: distributed forces-1
engineering statics: distributed forces-1
Β 
Fundamentals of vibration
Fundamentals of vibrationFundamentals of vibration
Fundamentals of vibration
Β 
Bending stress and shear stress for Asymmetric I-Section.
Bending stress and shear stress for Asymmetric  I-Section.Bending stress and shear stress for Asymmetric  I-Section.
Bending stress and shear stress for Asymmetric I-Section.
Β 
Solution Manul for Structural Analysis in SI Units 10th Edition by Russell Hi...
Solution Manul for Structural Analysis in SI Units 10th Edition by Russell Hi...Solution Manul for Structural Analysis in SI Units 10th Edition by Russell Hi...
Solution Manul for Structural Analysis in SI Units 10th Edition by Russell Hi...
Β 
Chapter 1: Stress, Axial Loads and Safety Concepts
Chapter 1: Stress, Axial Loads and Safety ConceptsChapter 1: Stress, Axial Loads and Safety Concepts
Chapter 1: Stress, Axial Loads and Safety Concepts
Β 

Viewers also liked

Solid_Modeling_Project_#2_ Reverse engineering of a connecting rod and docume...
Solid_Modeling_Project_#2_ Reverse engineering of a connecting rod and docume...Solid_Modeling_Project_#2_ Reverse engineering of a connecting rod and docume...
Solid_Modeling_Project_#2_ Reverse engineering of a connecting rod and docume...Mehmet Bariskan
Β 
Solid_Modeling_Project_Reverse engineering of a computer mouse and documentat...
Solid_Modeling_Project_Reverse engineering of a computer mouse and documentat...Solid_Modeling_Project_Reverse engineering of a computer mouse and documentat...
Solid_Modeling_Project_Reverse engineering of a computer mouse and documentat...Mehmet Bariskan
Β 
Final Project_ Design and FEM Analysis of Scissor Jack
Final Project_ Design and FEM Analysis of Scissor JackFinal Project_ Design and FEM Analysis of Scissor Jack
Final Project_ Design and FEM Analysis of Scissor JackMehmet Bariskan
Β 
Interpretive Paper_#1_Role and Development of Engineering Judgment
Interpretive Paper_#1_Role and Development of Engineering JudgmentInterpretive Paper_#1_Role and Development of Engineering Judgment
Interpretive Paper_#1_Role and Development of Engineering JudgmentMehmet Bariskan
Β 
FEM_Modeling_Project_Evaluation of a Steel Pulley and Shaft Design
FEM_Modeling_Project_Evaluation of a Steel Pulley and Shaft DesignFEM_Modeling_Project_Evaluation of a Steel Pulley and Shaft Design
FEM_Modeling_Project_Evaluation of a Steel Pulley and Shaft DesignMehmet Bariskan
Β 
Input Shaft Project
Input Shaft ProjectInput Shaft Project
Input Shaft Projectgarrett harker
Β 
Interpretive Paper_#2_ What is the biggest mistake in engineering education
Interpretive Paper_#2_ What is the biggest mistake in engineering educationInterpretive Paper_#2_ What is the biggest mistake in engineering education
Interpretive Paper_#2_ What is the biggest mistake in engineering educationMehmet Bariskan
Β 
FEM project # 2
FEM project # 2FEM project # 2
FEM project # 2James Li
Β 
Heat simulator design Problem 1
Heat simulator design Problem 1Heat simulator design Problem 1
Heat simulator design Problem 1James Li
Β 
Final Presentation
Final PresentationFinal Presentation
Final PresentationAsh Abel
Β 
Bending1
Bending1Bending1
Bending1aero103
Β 
thermal project # 2
thermal project # 2thermal project # 2
thermal project # 2James Li
Β 
Theoretical and Software Based Comparison of Cantilever Beam: MODAL ANALYSIS
Theoretical and Software Based Comparison of Cantilever Beam: MODAL ANALYSISTheoretical and Software Based Comparison of Cantilever Beam: MODAL ANALYSIS
Theoretical and Software Based Comparison of Cantilever Beam: MODAL ANALYSISAM Publications
Β 
Mehmet Bariskan -Env. Control 2010_Design for a heating and cooling system of...
Mehmet Bariskan -Env. Control 2010_Design for a heating and cooling system of...Mehmet Bariskan -Env. Control 2010_Design for a heating and cooling system of...
Mehmet Bariskan -Env. Control 2010_Design for a heating and cooling system of...Mehmet Bariskan
Β 
invelox (Mehmet Bariskan)
invelox (Mehmet Bariskan)invelox (Mehmet Bariskan)
invelox (Mehmet Bariskan)Mehmet Bariskan
Β 
Metallographic Analysis (theory)
Metallographic Analysis (theory)Metallographic Analysis (theory)
Metallographic Analysis (theory)Nurul Nurdiyana Rusdi
Β 
ANALYSIS FOR FREE VIBRATION OF LAMINATED COMPOSITE & SANDWICH PLATES WITH THE...
ANALYSIS FOR FREE VIBRATION OF LAMINATED COMPOSITE & SANDWICH PLATES WITH THE...ANALYSIS FOR FREE VIBRATION OF LAMINATED COMPOSITE & SANDWICH PLATES WITH THE...
ANALYSIS FOR FREE VIBRATION OF LAMINATED COMPOSITE & SANDWICH PLATES WITH THE...IAEME Publication
Β 
Kevlar-29
Kevlar-29Kevlar-29
Kevlar-29James Li
Β 

Viewers also liked (20)

Solid_Modeling_Project_#2_ Reverse engineering of a connecting rod and docume...
Solid_Modeling_Project_#2_ Reverse engineering of a connecting rod and docume...Solid_Modeling_Project_#2_ Reverse engineering of a connecting rod and docume...
Solid_Modeling_Project_#2_ Reverse engineering of a connecting rod and docume...
Β 
Solid_Modeling_Project_Reverse engineering of a computer mouse and documentat...
Solid_Modeling_Project_Reverse engineering of a computer mouse and documentat...Solid_Modeling_Project_Reverse engineering of a computer mouse and documentat...
Solid_Modeling_Project_Reverse engineering of a computer mouse and documentat...
Β 
Final Project_ Design and FEM Analysis of Scissor Jack
Final Project_ Design and FEM Analysis of Scissor JackFinal Project_ Design and FEM Analysis of Scissor Jack
Final Project_ Design and FEM Analysis of Scissor Jack
Β 
Interpretive Paper_#1_Role and Development of Engineering Judgment
Interpretive Paper_#1_Role and Development of Engineering JudgmentInterpretive Paper_#1_Role and Development of Engineering Judgment
Interpretive Paper_#1_Role and Development of Engineering Judgment
Β 
FEM_Modeling_Project_Evaluation of a Steel Pulley and Shaft Design
FEM_Modeling_Project_Evaluation of a Steel Pulley and Shaft DesignFEM_Modeling_Project_Evaluation of a Steel Pulley and Shaft Design
FEM_Modeling_Project_Evaluation of a Steel Pulley and Shaft Design
Β 
Input Shaft Project
Input Shaft ProjectInput Shaft Project
Input Shaft Project
Β 
Interpretive Paper_#2_ What is the biggest mistake in engineering education
Interpretive Paper_#2_ What is the biggest mistake in engineering educationInterpretive Paper_#2_ What is the biggest mistake in engineering education
Interpretive Paper_#2_ What is the biggest mistake in engineering education
Β 
FEM project # 2
FEM project # 2FEM project # 2
FEM project # 2
Β 
Heat simulator design Problem 1
Heat simulator design Problem 1Heat simulator design Problem 1
Heat simulator design Problem 1
Β 
Final Presentation
Final PresentationFinal Presentation
Final Presentation
Β 
Fracture Mechanics & Failure Analysis: Lecture Analysis of Fracture
Fracture Mechanics & Failure Analysis: Lecture Analysis of Fracture Fracture Mechanics & Failure Analysis: Lecture Analysis of Fracture
Fracture Mechanics & Failure Analysis: Lecture Analysis of Fracture
Β 
Bending1
Bending1Bending1
Bending1
Β 
thermal project # 2
thermal project # 2thermal project # 2
thermal project # 2
Β 
Theoretical and Software Based Comparison of Cantilever Beam: MODAL ANALYSIS
Theoretical and Software Based Comparison of Cantilever Beam: MODAL ANALYSISTheoretical and Software Based Comparison of Cantilever Beam: MODAL ANALYSIS
Theoretical and Software Based Comparison of Cantilever Beam: MODAL ANALYSIS
Β 
Mehmet Bariskan -Env. Control 2010_Design for a heating and cooling system of...
Mehmet Bariskan -Env. Control 2010_Design for a heating and cooling system of...Mehmet Bariskan -Env. Control 2010_Design for a heating and cooling system of...
Mehmet Bariskan -Env. Control 2010_Design for a heating and cooling system of...
Β 
invelox (Mehmet Bariskan)
invelox (Mehmet Bariskan)invelox (Mehmet Bariskan)
invelox (Mehmet Bariskan)
Β 
Metallographic Analysis (theory)
Metallographic Analysis (theory)Metallographic Analysis (theory)
Metallographic Analysis (theory)
Β 
Fracture
FractureFracture
Fracture
Β 
ANALYSIS FOR FREE VIBRATION OF LAMINATED COMPOSITE & SANDWICH PLATES WITH THE...
ANALYSIS FOR FREE VIBRATION OF LAMINATED COMPOSITE & SANDWICH PLATES WITH THE...ANALYSIS FOR FREE VIBRATION OF LAMINATED COMPOSITE & SANDWICH PLATES WITH THE...
ANALYSIS FOR FREE VIBRATION OF LAMINATED COMPOSITE & SANDWICH PLATES WITH THE...
Β 
Kevlar-29
Kevlar-29Kevlar-29
Kevlar-29
Β 

Similar to Vibration Midterm-THEORETICAL SOLUTION AND STATIC ANALYSES STUDY OF VIBRATIONS OF CHANNEL BEAMS

Chapter one.pptx
Chapter one.pptxChapter one.pptx
Chapter one.pptxhaymanot16
Β 
Ce 255 handout
Ce 255 handoutCe 255 handout
Ce 255 handoutDanielAkorful
Β 
Navier stokes equation in coordinates binormal, tangent and normal
Navier stokes equation in coordinates binormal, tangent and normalNavier stokes equation in coordinates binormal, tangent and normal
Navier stokes equation in coordinates binormal, tangent and normalCarlos LΓ³pez
Β 
Analysis of a self-sustained vibration of mass-spring oscillator on moving belt
Analysis of a self-sustained vibration of mass-spring oscillator on moving beltAnalysis of a self-sustained vibration of mass-spring oscillator on moving belt
Analysis of a self-sustained vibration of mass-spring oscillator on moving beltVarun Jadhav
Β 
Jee advanced 2015 paper 2 code 3 answer key v1
Jee advanced 2015 paper 2 code 3 answer key v1Jee advanced 2015 paper 2 code 3 answer key v1
Jee advanced 2015 paper 2 code 3 answer key v1Pradeep Kumar
Β 
Superposition of Harmonic oscillator-2.docx
Superposition of Harmonic oscillator-2.docxSuperposition of Harmonic oscillator-2.docx
Superposition of Harmonic oscillator-2.docxProfVilasShamraoPati
Β 
Paper_Sound-LineConstraints_CompositePanel
Paper_Sound-LineConstraints_CompositePanelPaper_Sound-LineConstraints_CompositePanel
Paper_Sound-LineConstraints_CompositePanelRam Mohan
Β 
Stresses and strains (Part 1)
Stresses and strains (Part 1)Stresses and strains (Part 1)
Stresses and strains (Part 1)AMIE(I) Study Circle
Β 
Fourier-transform analysis of a ridge waveguide and a rectangular coaxial line
Fourier-transform analysis of a ridge waveguide and a rectangular coaxial lineFourier-transform analysis of a ridge waveguide and a rectangular coaxial line
Fourier-transform analysis of a ridge waveguide and a rectangular coaxial lineYong Heui Cho
Β 
Relation between load shear force and bending moment of beams
Relation between load shear force and bending moment of  beamsRelation between load shear force and bending moment of  beams
Relation between load shear force and bending moment of beamssushma chinta
Β 
Jee advanced 2015 paper 1 code 1 final
Jee advanced 2015 paper 1 code 1 final Jee advanced 2015 paper 1 code 1 final
Jee advanced 2015 paper 1 code 1 final Pradeep Kumar
Β 
DATA ANALYSIS IN PHYSICS.pdf
DATA  ANALYSIS IN PHYSICS.pdfDATA  ANALYSIS IN PHYSICS.pdf
DATA ANALYSIS IN PHYSICS.pdfAbofongPrecious
Β 
Shiwua paper
Shiwua paperShiwua paper
Shiwua papermanojg1990
Β 
Superposition of Harmonic Oscillator-1.docx
Superposition of Harmonic Oscillator-1.docxSuperposition of Harmonic Oscillator-1.docx
Superposition of Harmonic Oscillator-1.docxProfVilasShamraoPati
Β 

Similar to Vibration Midterm-THEORETICAL SOLUTION AND STATIC ANALYSES STUDY OF VIBRATIONS OF CHANNEL BEAMS (20)

Chapter one.pptx
Chapter one.pptxChapter one.pptx
Chapter one.pptx
Β 
Ce 255 handout
Ce 255 handoutCe 255 handout
Ce 255 handout
Β 
Navier stokes equation in coordinates binormal, tangent and normal
Navier stokes equation in coordinates binormal, tangent and normalNavier stokes equation in coordinates binormal, tangent and normal
Navier stokes equation in coordinates binormal, tangent and normal
Β 
Analysis of a self-sustained vibration of mass-spring oscillator on moving belt
Analysis of a self-sustained vibration of mass-spring oscillator on moving beltAnalysis of a self-sustained vibration of mass-spring oscillator on moving belt
Analysis of a self-sustained vibration of mass-spring oscillator on moving belt
Β 
DC AC.pptx
DC AC.pptxDC AC.pptx
DC AC.pptx
Β 
New name-400-4
New name-400-4New name-400-4
New name-400-4
Β 
Jee advanced 2015 paper 2 code 3 answer key v1
Jee advanced 2015 paper 2 code 3 answer key v1Jee advanced 2015 paper 2 code 3 answer key v1
Jee advanced 2015 paper 2 code 3 answer key v1
Β 
Superposition of Harmonic oscillator-2.docx
Superposition of Harmonic oscillator-2.docxSuperposition of Harmonic oscillator-2.docx
Superposition of Harmonic oscillator-2.docx
Β 
Paper_Sound-LineConstraints_CompositePanel
Paper_Sound-LineConstraints_CompositePanelPaper_Sound-LineConstraints_CompositePanel
Paper_Sound-LineConstraints_CompositePanel
Β 
Stresses and strains (Part 1)
Stresses and strains (Part 1)Stresses and strains (Part 1)
Stresses and strains (Part 1)
Β 
Stability of piles
Stability of pilesStability of piles
Stability of piles
Β 
Geomechanics for Petroleum Engineers
Geomechanics for Petroleum EngineersGeomechanics for Petroleum Engineers
Geomechanics for Petroleum Engineers
Β 
Stability
StabilityStability
Stability
Β 
Fourier-transform analysis of a ridge waveguide and a rectangular coaxial line
Fourier-transform analysis of a ridge waveguide and a rectangular coaxial lineFourier-transform analysis of a ridge waveguide and a rectangular coaxial line
Fourier-transform analysis of a ridge waveguide and a rectangular coaxial line
Β 
J011138795
J011138795J011138795
J011138795
Β 
Relation between load shear force and bending moment of beams
Relation between load shear force and bending moment of  beamsRelation between load shear force and bending moment of  beams
Relation between load shear force and bending moment of beams
Β 
Jee advanced 2015 paper 1 code 1 final
Jee advanced 2015 paper 1 code 1 final Jee advanced 2015 paper 1 code 1 final
Jee advanced 2015 paper 1 code 1 final
Β 
DATA ANALYSIS IN PHYSICS.pdf
DATA  ANALYSIS IN PHYSICS.pdfDATA  ANALYSIS IN PHYSICS.pdf
DATA ANALYSIS IN PHYSICS.pdf
Β 
Shiwua paper
Shiwua paperShiwua paper
Shiwua paper
Β 
Superposition of Harmonic Oscillator-1.docx
Superposition of Harmonic Oscillator-1.docxSuperposition of Harmonic Oscillator-1.docx
Superposition of Harmonic Oscillator-1.docx
Β 

Vibration Midterm-THEORETICAL SOLUTION AND STATIC ANALYSES STUDY OF VIBRATIONS OF CHANNEL BEAMS

  • 1. 1 Spring 2010 Department : Mechanical Engineering, City University of Newyork, Newyork, U.S.A Course : Adv. Mech. Vibrations: ME I6200 4ST [3223] (CCNY) Subject : Transverse Vibration of Channel Beams Instructor : Prof. Benjamin Liaw Student : Mech. Eng. M. Bariskan
  • 2. 2 THEORETICAL SOLUTION AND STATIC ANALYSES STUDY OF VIBRATIONS OF CHANNEL BEAMS Abstract; In this paper, studies of thin-walled channel beams with known cross section area and length were conducted using certain static analyses and verified with known theoretical solution. The motion of the system is described by a homogenous set of partial differential equations. Used; Mathcad to solve roots for natural frequency, Used Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theoretical equations for equation of motion and Solidworks for certain analyses. The result of the presented theoretical analyses for Channel beams are compared with result taken from Solidworks. Keywords: Transverse Vibration of Beams, Channel Beam , Equation of Motion
  • 3. 3 1.1 Introduction In this paper the free transverse vibration of beams considered. The equations of motion of a beam are derived according to the Euler-Bernoulli, Rayleigh, and Timoshenko theories. The Euler Bernoulli theory neglects the effects of rotary inertia and shear deformation and is applicable to an analysis of thin beams. The Rayleigh theory considers the effect of rotary inertia, and the Timoshenko theory considers the effect of both rotary inertia and shear deformation. The Timoshenko theory can be used for thick beams. The equations of motion for the transverse vibration of beams are in the form of fourth-order partial differential equations with two boundary conditions at each end. In this paper; The free vibration solution, including the determination of natural frequencies and mode shapes, is considered according to Euler- Bernoulli theory. 1.2 Equation of Motion : Euler- Bernoulli Theory In the Euler- Bernoulli or thin beam theory, the rotation of cross section of the beam is neglected compared to the translation. In addition, the angular distortion due to shear is considered negligible compared to the bending deformation. The thin beam theory is applicable to beams for which the length is much larger than the depth (at list 10 times), and the deflection are small compared to the depth. When the transverse displacement of the centerline of the beam is w, the displacement remain plane and normal to the centerline are given by figure 1,
  • 4. 4 𝑒 = βˆ’π‘§ πœ•π‘€(π‘₯, 𝑑) πœ•π‘₯ , 𝑣 = 0, 𝑀 = 𝑀(π‘₯, 𝑑) where u, v, w denote the components of displacement parallel to x, y, and z directions, respectively. The components of strain and stress corresponding to this displacement field are given by πœ€ π‘₯π‘₯ = πœ•π‘’ πœ•π‘₯ = βˆ’π‘§ πœ•2 𝑀(π‘₯, 𝑑) πœ•π‘₯2 , πœ€ 𝑦𝑦 = πœ€ 𝑧𝑧 = πœ€ π‘₯𝑦 = πœ€ 𝑦𝑧 = πœ€ 𝑧π‘₯ = 0 𝜍π‘₯π‘₯ = βˆ’πΈπ‘§ πœ•2 𝑀 πœ•π‘₯2 , πœπ‘¦π‘¦ = πœπ‘§π‘§ = 𝜍π‘₯𝑦 = πœπ‘¦π‘§ = πœπ‘§π‘₯ = 0 And, if we explain the strain energy of the system (Ο€) and Iy=I denotes the area moment of inertia of the cross section of the beam about the y axis 𝐼 = 𝐼𝑦 = 𝑧2 𝑑𝐴𝐴 , The kinetic energy of the system (T) , and these are calculated in, 𝑀 = 𝑓𝑀𝑑π‘₯ 𝑙 0 The application of the generalized Hamiltons principle gives, 𝛿 πœ‹ βˆ’ 𝑇 βˆ’ π‘Š 𝑑𝑑 = 0 π‘œπ‘Ÿ 𝛿 1 2 𝐸𝐼( πœ•2 𝑀 πœ•π‘₯2 )2 𝑑π‘₯ + β‹― … . . 𝑙 0 = 0 𝑑2 𝑑1 𝑑2 𝑑1 By setting the expressions are giving by book which is vibration of continuous systems page 320,321
  • 5. 5 We have differential equation of motion for the transverse vibration of the beam as ; πœ•2 πœ•π‘₯2 𝐸𝐼 πœ•2 𝑀 πœ•π‘₯2 + 𝜌𝐴 πœ•2 𝑀 πœ•π‘‘2 = 𝑓(π‘₯, 𝑑) (1.1) And the boundary conditions as 𝐸𝐼 πœ•2 𝑀 πœ•π‘₯2 πœ•π‘€ πœ•π‘₯ 𝐼0 𝑙 βˆ’ πœ• πœ•π‘₯ 𝐸𝐼 πœ•2 𝑀 πœ•π‘₯2 𝛿𝑀𝐼0 𝑙 + π‘˜1 𝑀𝛿𝑀𝐼0 + π‘˜π‘‘1 πœ•π‘€ πœ•π‘₯ 𝛿 πœ•π‘€ πœ•π‘₯ 𝐼0 + π‘š1 πœ•2 𝑀 πœ•π‘₯2 𝛿𝑀𝐼0 + π‘˜2 𝑀𝛿𝑀𝐼𝑙 + π‘˜π‘‘2 πœ•π‘€ πœ•π‘₯ 𝛿 πœ•π‘€ πœ•π‘₯ 𝐼𝑙 + π‘š2 πœ•2 𝑀 πœ•π‘₯2 𝛿𝑀𝐼𝑙 =0 (1.2) At x=0, πœ•π‘€ πœ•π‘₯ =constant (so that 𝛿 πœ•π‘€ πœ•π‘₯ = 0) or βˆ’πΈπΌ πœ•2 𝑀 πœ•π‘₯2 + π‘˜π‘‘1 πœ•π‘€ πœ•π‘₯ = 0 (1.3) w = constant (so that 𝛿𝑀 = 0 ) or ( πœ• πœ•π‘₯ 𝐸𝐼 πœ•2 𝑀 πœ•π‘₯2 + π‘˜1 𝑀 + π‘š1 πœ•2 𝑀 πœ•π‘₯2 ) = 0 At x=l, πœ•π‘€ πœ•π‘₯ =constant (so that 𝛿 πœ•π‘€ πœ•π‘₯ = 0) or 𝐸𝐼 πœ•2 𝑀 πœ•π‘₯2 + π‘˜π‘‘2 πœ•π‘€ πœ•π‘₯ = 0 (1.4) w = constant (so that 𝛿𝑀 = 0 ) or (βˆ’ πœ• πœ•π‘₯ 𝐸𝐼 πœ•2 𝑀 πœ•π‘₯2 + π‘˜2 𝑀 + π‘š2 πœ•2 𝑀 πœ•π‘₯2 ) = 0 (1.5) 1.3 Free Vibration Equations For free vibration, the external excitation is assumed to be zero : f(x,t)=0 (1.6) and hence the equation of motion ,Eq.(1.2), reduces to πœ•2 πœ•π‘₯2 𝐸𝐼 π‘₯ πœ•2 𝑀 π‘₯,𝑑 πœ•π‘₯2 + 𝜌𝐴 π‘₯ πœ•2 𝑀 π‘₯,𝑑 πœ•π‘‘2 = 0 (1.7) For a uniform beam Eq.(1.7) can be expressed as 𝑐2 πœ•4 𝑀 πœ•π‘₯4 (π‘₯, 𝑑) + πœ•2 𝑀 πœ•π‘‘2 (π‘₯, 𝑑) = 0 (1.8) 𝑐 = 𝐸𝐼 𝜌𝐴 (1.9)
  • 6. 6 1.4 Free Vibration Solution The free vibration solution can be found using the method of separation of variables as w(x,t)= W(x)T(t) (1.10) Using Eq. (1.10) in Eq.(1.8) and rearranging yields, 𝑐2 π‘Š(π‘₯) 𝑑4 π‘Š(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯4 = βˆ’ 1 𝑇(𝑑) 𝑑2 𝑇(𝑑) 𝑑𝑑2 = a = 𝑀2 (1.11) where a = 𝑀2 can be shown to be a positive constant Eq. (1.11) can be rewritten as two equations: 𝑑4 π‘Š(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯4 βˆ’ 𝛽4 π‘Š π‘₯ = 0 (1.12) 𝑑2 𝑇(𝑑) 𝑑𝑑2 + 𝑀2 𝑇 𝑑 = 0 (1.13) where 𝛽4 = 𝑀2 𝑐2 = 𝜌 𝜌𝐴 𝑀2 𝐸𝐼 (1.14) The solution of Eq.(1.13) is given by T(t) = A.coswt + B.sinwt where A and B are constant that can be found from the initial conditions. The solution of equation (1.12) is assumed to be of exponential form as π‘Š(π‘₯) = 𝐢𝑒 𝑠π‘₯ (1.15) Where C and s constants. Substitution of Eq. (1.15) into Eq.(1.12) result in the auxiliary equation 𝑠4 βˆ’ 𝛽4 = 0 (1.16) The roots of this equation are given by 𝑠1,2 = βˆ“π›½ 𝑠3,4 = βˆ“π‘–π›½ (1.17) Thus the solution of Eq. (1.12) can be expressed as π‘Š π‘₯ = 𝐢1 𝑒 𝛽π‘₯ + 𝐢2 π‘’βˆ’π›½π‘₯ + 𝐢3 𝑒 𝑖𝛽π‘₯ + 𝐢4 π‘’βˆ’π‘–π›½π‘₯ (1.18) where C1, C2, C3 and C4 are constants. Equation (1.18) can be expressed more conveniently as π‘Š π‘₯ = 𝐢1 π‘π‘œπ‘ π›½π‘₯ + 𝐢2 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽π‘₯ + 𝐢3 π‘π‘œπ‘ β„Žπ›½π‘₯ + 𝐢4 π‘ π‘–π‘›β„Žπ›½π‘₯ (1.19) or,
  • 7. 7 π‘Š π‘₯ = 𝐢1(π‘π‘œπ‘ π›½π‘₯ + π‘π‘œπ‘ β„Žπ›½π‘₯) + 𝐢2 π‘π‘œπ‘ π›½π‘₯ βˆ’ π‘π‘œπ‘ β„Žπ›½π‘₯ + 𝐢3 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽π‘₯ + π‘ π‘–π‘›β„Žπ›½π‘₯ + 𝐢4(𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛽π‘₯ βˆ’ π‘ π‘–π‘›β„Žπ›½π‘₯) (1.20) where C1, C2, C3 and C4 are different constants in each case. The natural frequencies of the beam can be determined of Eq. (1.14) as 𝑀 = 𝛽2 𝐸𝐼 𝜌𝐴 = (𝛽𝑙)2 𝐸𝐼 𝜌𝐴 𝑙4 (1.21) The function W(x) is known as the normal mode or characteristic function of the beam and w is called the natural frequency of vibration . For any beam, there will be infinite number of normal modes with one natural frequency associated with each normal mode. The unknown constant C1, C2, C3, C4 in Eq. (1.19) or Eq. (1.20) and the value of Ξ² in Eq. (1.21) can be determined from the known boundary conditions of the beam.
  • 8. 8 1.5 Frequencies and mode shapes of uniform beams The natural frequencies and mode shapes of beams with a uniform cross section with different boundary conditions are considered in this section. We can find boundary conditions from given tables in the textbook. Also Is listed below
  • 9. 9 1.5.1 Beam Simply Supported at Both Ends The transverse displacement and the bending moment are zero at the both ends. Hence boundary conditions can be started as: (1.22) or πœ•2 π‘Š πœ•π‘₯2 (0) = 0 (1.23) (1.24) or πœ•2 π‘Š πœ•π‘₯2 (𝑙) = 0 (1.25) When used In the solution of Eq. (1.20), Eq.(1.22) and (1.23) yield C1=C2=0 (1.26)
  • 10. 10 (1.26) (1.27) (1.28) These equations denote a system of two equations in the two unknowns and . For a nontrivial solution of and , the determinant of the coefficients must be equal to zero. This leads to or (1.29) It can be observed that is not equal to zero unless =0. The value of =0 need not be considered because it implies, according to equation; =0, which corresponds to the beam at rest. Thus, the frequency equations becomes (1.30) The roots of the equations, , are given by , (1.31) And hence the natural frequencies of vibration become =𝑛2 πœ‹2 ( 𝐸𝐼 𝜌𝐴 𝑙4)1/2 , n=1,2,…….. (1.32)
  • 11. 11 We are going to find reaction force, moment maximum, stress, deflection and strain magnitude for this C-beam and natural frequencies of vibration of a channel beam (material stainless steel AISI 304) 3 m long,0.03 thick and dimensions 0.15 m, 0.25 m respectively. As shown figure, Figure1 : C-beam Main Dimension And the specifications for this material: AISI 304 Stainless Steel Elastic Modulus (E) : 190*109 Pa, Density (ρ) : 8000 kg / m3 =8000*9.81 =78480 N/m3 =78.4 kN/m3 Area (A) :2*( 0.15*0.03) + (0.19*0.03) = 0.0147 m2 𝐼𝑧 β‰ˆ 2 3 π‘Ž3 𝑑 + 2π‘Ž2 𝑏𝑑 = 0.000126723 m4 from textbook equation Volume per meter = 0.0147 m3 Total V= 0.0441m3 mass=rho*V*g(9.81 m/sn2)=3460.9 N
  • 12. 12 Firstly, We are going to find reaction force, moment, stress, deflection, and strain magnitude to compare static analyses both, theoretical and Solidworks result then mod shapes and Natural frequencies is calculated and compared on same way. Figure-2-Free Body Diagram –Simply Supported Beam For simply supported both ends 𝐹𝑦 = 0 βˆ’ π‘ž + π‘‰π‘Ž + 𝑉𝑏 = 0 𝑀𝑏 = 0 3. π‘‰π‘Ž βˆ’ 1.5π‘ž = 0 π‘ž = 1153 𝑁 π‘Š = 3 βˆ— 1153 = 3460.9𝑁 Va = 1730N =Vb Figure – 3 Reaction Force for Simply-supported at both ends (Solidworks 2008) And Plotting the shear force and Bending moment diagram below:
  • 13. 13 Figure-4 Shear Force and Moment Diagrams for Simply Supported Both Ends Moment max : 1730*1.5/2 = 1297.5 N.m 𝜍π‘₯π‘₯ = 𝑀𝑧.𝑦 𝐼𝑧𝑧 = 1297.5βˆ—0.125 0.000126723 = 0.127 Mpa Figure-5 Stress (normal stress) for z direction Equation of deflection for simply supported ends 𝛿 = βˆ’5. 𝑀. 𝐿4 384. 𝐸. 𝐼 = βˆ’5.1153.6 βˆ— 34 384.190 βˆ— 109 βˆ— 0.000126723 = βˆ’0.000051 = 5.1 βˆ— 10βˆ’5 π‘š
  • 14. 14 Figure- 6 Deflection on The Simply Supported beam ( Solidworks) Mode shapes and Natural Frequencies for Simply Supported Both End Figure-7 Natural frequencies and mode shapes of a beam simply supported beam. , For n 𝜷 𝟏 𝒍 = πŸ‘. πŸπŸ’πŸπŸ” 𝜷 𝟐 𝒍 = πŸ”. πŸπŸ–πŸ‘πŸ 𝜷 πŸ‘ 𝒍 = πŸ—. πŸ’πŸπŸ’πŸ– 𝜷 πŸ’ 𝒍 = πŸ—. πŸ’πŸπŸ’πŸ– Equations Euler-Bernoulli calculated in MathCAD , results are in the units : rad/sc simply supported at both ends
  • 15. 15 n=1 193 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 3.1416 2 οƒ— 159.562ο€½ n=2 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 6.2832 2 οƒ— 633.268ο€½ n=3 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 9.4248 2 οƒ— 1.425 10 3 ο‚΄ο€½ n=4 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 12.5664 2 οƒ— 2.533 10 3 ο‚΄ο€½ n=5 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 15.708 2 οƒ— 3.958 10 3 ο‚΄ο€½ And From Solidworks Result we have, 1:39 Monday April 05 2010 Study name: Study 2 Mode No. Frequency(Rad/sec) Frequency(Hertz) Period(Seconds) 1 311.23 49.534 0.020188 2 454.9 72.4 0.013812 3 714.83 113.77 0.0087898 4 746.45 118.8 0.0084175 5 1181 187.96 0.0053202 6 1382.9 220.09 0.0045436 7 1546.3 246.11 0.0040633 8 2152.4 342.57 0.0029191 9 2305.5 366.94 0.0027253 10 2702.4 430.1 0.002325 11 3311.2 526.99 0.0018976 12 3875.2 616.75 0.0016214 13 4076.8 648.84 0.0015412 14 4082.5 649.75 0.001539 15 4154.1 661.15 0.0015125 16 4309.1 685.81 0.0014581 17 4569.9 727.32 0.0013749 18 4900.2 779.89 0.0012822 19 4969.3 790.89 0.0012644 20 5185 825.21 0.0012118
  • 16. 16 Solidworks = 454 Rd/sc Theoretical= 633 Rd/sc Error = %12 Mode shape = 1 Figure-8 Mode Shape 1 For S.S Both Ends Solidworks = 1328 Rd/sc Theoretical= 1425 Rd/sc Error = %7 Mode shape = 2 Figure-9 Mode Shape 2 For S.S Both Ends Solidworks = 2305 Rd/sc Theoretical= 2533 Rd/sc Error = %9 Mode shape = 3 Figure-10 Mode Shape 3 For S.S Both Ends Solidworks = 3875 Rd/sc Theoretical= 3958 Rd/sc Error = % 2 Mode shape = 4 Figure-11 Mode Shape 4 For S.S Both Ends
  • 17. 17 1.5.2 Beam Fixed-fixed Ends We are going to find reaction force, moment, stress, deflection, and strain magnitude to compare static analyses both, theoretical and Solidworks result then mod shapes and Natural frequencies is calculated and compared on same way. For fixed-fixed beams Figure-12-Free Body Diagram –Fixed-fixed Beam For fixed-fixed supported both ends 𝐹𝑦 = 0 βˆ’ π‘ž + π‘‰π‘Ž + 𝑉𝑏 = 0 𝑀𝑏 = 0 3. π‘‰π‘Ž βˆ’ 1.5π‘ž = 0 π‘ž = 1153 𝑁 π‘Š = 3 βˆ— 1153 = 3460.9𝑁 Va = 1730N =Vb And Plotting the shear force and Bending moment diagram below: Figure-13 Shear Force and Moment Diagrams for Fixed-fixed Beam
  • 18. 18 Moment max= (1153*32 /12)+(1730*1.5/2)=2162.25 N.m 𝜍π‘₯π‘₯ = 𝑀𝑧.𝑦 𝐼𝑧𝑧 = 2162.25βˆ—0.125 0.000126723 = 2.13 Mpa Figure-14 Stress (normal stress) for z direction Equation of deflection for fixed-fixed ends 𝛿 = βˆ’π‘€. 𝐿4 384. 𝐸. 𝐼 = 1153.6 βˆ— 34 384.190 βˆ— 109 βˆ— 0.000126723 = βˆ’0.0000101 = 1.01 βˆ— 10βˆ’5 π‘š Figure- 15 Deflection on The Fixed-fixed beam ( Solidworks)
  • 19. 19 Mode shapes and Natural Frequencies for Fixed-Fixed Both End Figure-16 Natural frequencies and mode shapes of a beam fixed-fixed end Natural frequencies and mode shapes of a beam simply supported at both ends. , 𝛽𝑛 𝑙 β‰… 2𝑛 + 1 πœ‹/2 For n 𝛽1 𝑙 = 4.73 𝛽2 𝑙 = 7.8532 𝛽3 𝑙 = 10.996 𝛽4 𝑙 = 14.731 Equations Euler-Bernoulli calculated in Mathcad, results are in the units : rad/sc simply supported at both ends
  • 20. 20 n=1 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 4.73 2 οƒ— 358.879ο€½ n=2 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 7.8532 2 οƒ— 989.279ο€½ n=3 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 10.9956 2 οƒ— 1.939 10 3 ο‚΄ο€½ n=4 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 14.1372 2 οƒ— 3.206 10 3 ο‚΄ο€½ n=5 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 17.2788 2 οƒ— 4.789 10 3 ο‚΄ο€½ n=6 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 20.4204 2 οƒ— 6.689 10 3 ο‚΄ο€½ 9:59 Monday April 05 2010 Study name: Fixed- Fixed Mode No. Frequency(Rad/sec) Frequency(Hertz) Period(Seconds) 1 530.96 84.504 0.011834 2 543.06 86.431 0.01157 3 1265.1 201.34 0.0049667 4 1366.7 217.52 0.0045973 5 1408.6 224.18 0.0044606 6 2208.6 351.51 0.0028449 7 2624.5 417.7 0.0023941 8 3208.8 510.7 0.0019581 9 3333.9 530.61 0.0018846 10 4036.4 642.41 0.0015566 11 4090.4 651.01 0.0015361 12 4321.9 687.85 0.0014538 13 4562.4 726.12 0.0013772 14 4686.2 745.83 0.0013408 15 5114 813.92 0.0012286 16 5251 835.73 0.0011966 17 5299 843.36 0.0011857 18 5380.8 856.39 0.0011677 19 5797.8 922.75 0.0010837 20 6137.6 976.84 0.0010237
  • 21. 21 Solidworks= 530.96 rd/sc Therotical= 358.59 rd/sc Error = %48 Mode=1 Figure-17 Mode Shape 1 for F-F Both Ends Solidworks= 1265.61 rd/sc Therotical= 989.2 rd/sc Error = %27 Mode=2 Figure-18 Mode Shape 2 for F-F Both Ends Solidworks= 2208.6 rd/sc Theoretical= 1938.6 rd/sc Error = %12 Mode=3 Figure-19 Mode Shape 3 for F-F Both Ends Solidworks= 3206 rd/sc Therotical= 3208 rd/sc Error = %01 Mode=4 Figure-20 Mode Shape 4 For F-F Both Ends
  • 22. 22 1.5.3 Beam Fixed-Simply Supported Ends Thirdly, We are going to find reaction force, moment, stress, deflection, and strain magnitude to compare static analyses both, theoretical and Solidworks result then mod shapes and Natural frequencies is calculated and compared on same way. For Fixed-Simply Supported Figure-21-Free Body Diagram –Fixed-Simply Supported Beam V(z)= - 1/8 * w *(5L-8x) Vmax= Vz=0 Va = - 5Lw/8 Vb=3Lw/8 Va= - 5*3*1153/8 = 2161.8 N Vb= 1297.125 N Figure-22 Shear Force and Moment Diagrams for Fixed-Simply Supported Beam And Moment for any point of beam 𝑀𝑏 = 𝑀. π‘₯ 3𝐿 8 βˆ’ π‘₯ 2 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘€π‘Žπ‘₯ π‘€π‘œπ‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘Žπ‘‘ 3 8 𝐿 𝑀𝑏 = 9 128 𝑀𝐿2 = 729 𝑁
  • 23. 23 𝑀 π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ = 1 8 𝑀𝐿2 = 1297 𝑁. π‘š 𝜍π‘₯π‘₯ = 𝑀𝑧.𝑦 𝐼𝑧𝑧 = 1297βˆ—0.125 0.000126723 = 1.27 Mpa Figure-23 Stress (normal stress) for z direction Equation of deflection for simplysupport-fixed ends At x=0.4215l 𝛿 = βˆ’π‘€. 𝐿4 185. 𝐸. 𝐼 = βˆ’ 1153.6 βˆ— 34 185.190 βˆ— 109 βˆ— 0.000126723 = βˆ’0.0000209 = 2.09 βˆ— 10βˆ’5 π‘š Figure- 24 Deflection on The Fixed-Simply Supported beam ( Solidworks)
  • 24. 24 Mode shapes and Natural Frequencies for Simply supported-Fixed End Figure-25 Natural frequencies and mode shapes of a beam simply supported-fixed end , 𝛽𝑛 𝑙 β‰… 4𝑛 + 1 πœ‹/4 For n 𝛽1 𝑙 = 3.9266 𝛽2 𝑙 = 7.06686 𝛽3 𝑙 = 10.212 𝛽4 𝑙 = 13.3518 Equations Euler-Bernoulli calculated in Mathcad, results are in the units : rad/sc simply supported – fixed ends.
  • 25. 25 n=1 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 3.9266 2 οƒ— 247.32ο€½ n=2 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 7.0686 2 οƒ— 801.479ο€½ n=3 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 10.2102 2 οƒ— 1.672 10 3 ο‚΄ο€½ n=4 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 13.3518 2 οƒ— 2.86 10 3 ο‚΄ο€½ 16:21 Monday April 05 2010 Study name: Study 2 Mode No. Frequency(Rad/sec) Frequency(Hertz) Period(Seconds) 1 399.57 63.594 0.015725 2 486.22 77.384 0.012923 3 817.66 130.13 0.0076843 4 1101.4 175.29 0.0057047 5 1277.1 203.25 0.0049201 6 1597.5 254.25 0.0039332 7 2157.2 343.33 0.0029126 8 2570.3 409.08 0.0024445 9 2862 455.51 0.0021954 10 3345.3 532.42 0.0018782 11 4010.5 638.29 0.0015667 12 4030.2 641.42 0.001559 13 4103.5 653.1 0.0015312 14 4302.6 684.79 0.0014603 15 4479.7 712.96 0.0014026 16 4632.1 737.22 0.0013564 17 5016.4 798.38 0.0012525 18 5219.9 830.76 0.0012037 19 5331 848.45 0.0011786 20 5665.7 901.73 0.001109
  • 26. 26 Solidworks = 399 rd/sc Theoretical = 247 rd/sc Error = %61 Mode = 1 Figure-26 Mode Shape 1 for F-S Ends Solidworks = 801 rd/sc Theoretical = 817 rd/sc Error = %2 Mode =2 Figure-27 Mode Shape 2 for F-S Ends Solidworks 1597rd/sc Theoretical = 1672 Rd/sc Error = % 4 Mode = 3 Figure-28 Mode Shape 3 for F-S Ends Solidworks = 2862 rd/sc Theoretical = 2860 rd/sc Error = %0.01 Figure-29 Mode Shape 4 for F-S Ends
  • 27. 27 1.5.4 Beam Fixed-Free Ends (Cantilever Beam) Fourtly, We are going to find reaction force, moment, stress, deflection, and strain magnitude to compare static analyses both, theoretical and Solidworks result then mod shapes and Natural frequencies is calculated and compared on same way. For Cantilever Beams Figure-30-Free Body Diagram –Cantilever Beam For simply supported-fixed ends V(b)= - w.l Vmax= -1153*3 = 3460.9 N Figure-31 Shear Force and Moment Diagrams for Cantilever Beam
  • 28. 28 And Moment for any point of beam 𝑀 = 𝑀π‘₯2 2 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘€π‘Žπ‘₯ π‘€π‘œπ‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ 𝑀 π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ = 𝑀𝑙2 2 = 1153 βˆ— 9 2 = 5188 𝑁. π‘š 𝜍π‘₯π‘₯ = 𝑀𝑧.𝑦 𝐼𝑧𝑧 = 5188βˆ—0.125 0.000126723 = 5.117 Mpa Figure-32 Stress (normal stress) for z direction Equation of deflection for fixed-free ends At free ends 𝛿 = βˆ’π‘€. 𝐿4 8. 𝐸. 𝐼 = βˆ’ 1153.6 βˆ— 34 8.190 βˆ— 109 βˆ— 0.000126723 = βˆ’0.000485111 = 4.85 βˆ— 10βˆ’4 π‘š Figure- 33 Deflection on The Cantilever Beam ( Solidworks)
  • 29. 29 Mode shapes and Natural Frequencies for Fixed-Free (Cantilever Beams) Figure-34 Natural frequencies and mode shapes of a cantilever beam , 𝛽𝑛 𝑙 β‰… 2𝑛 βˆ’ 1 πœ‹/2 For n 𝛽1 𝑙 = 1.8751 𝛽2 𝑙 = 4.6941 𝛽3 𝑙 = 7.8547 𝛽4 𝑙 = 10.9956 Equations Euler-Bernoulli calculated in Mathcad, results are in the units : rad/sc fixed-free ends
  • 30. 30 n=1 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 1.8751 2 οƒ— 56.399ο€½ n=2 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 4.6941 2 οƒ— 353.452ο€½ n=3 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 7.8547 2 οƒ— 989.657ο€½ n=4 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 10.9956 2 οƒ— 1.939 10 3 ο‚΄ο€½ 18:33 Monday April 05 2010 Study name: Study 2 Mode No. Frequency(Rad/sec) Frequency(Hertz) Period(Seconds) 1 85.685 13.637 0.073329 2 154.42 24.576 0.04069 3 345.67 55.015 0.018177 4 526.33 83.767 0.011938 5 696.91 110.92 0.0090158 6 1348.4 214.6 0.0046598 7 1427.8 227.24 0.0044006 8 1538.4 244.84 0.0040843 9 2347.7 373.65 0.0026763 10 2554.8 406.61 0.0024594 11 2671 425.11 0.0023523 12 3383.2 538.45 0.0018572 13 3497.6 556.67 0.0017964 14 4044.3 643.66 0.0015536 15 4130.6 657.41 0.0015211 16 4198.3 668.18 0.0014966 17 4482.7 713.45 0.0014016 18 4732.1 753.13 0.0013278 19 4919.5 782.96 0.0012772 20 5372.7 855.09 0.0011695
  • 31. 31 Solidworks = 85.65 Rd /sc Theoretical = 56.39 Rd/sc Error = %51 Mode=1 Figure-35 Mode Shape 1 for Fixed-Free Ends Solidworks = 345.67 Rd/sc Theoretical = 353.45 Error = %3 Mode=2 Figure-36 Mode Shape 2 for Fixed-Free Ends Solidworks = 989 Rd/sc Theoretical = 1248.94 Rd/sc Error= %26 Mode=3 Figure-37 Mode Shape 3 for Fixed-Free Ends Solidworks = 2347 Rd/sc Theoretical = 1939.49 Rd/sc Error = %21 Mode=4 Figure-38 Mode Shape 4 for Fixed-Free Ends
  • 32. 32 1.5.5 Beam free-Free Ends Finally, We are going to find reaction force, moment, stress, deflection, and strain magnitude to compare static analyses both, theoretical and Solidworks result then mod shapes and Natural frequencies is calculated and compared on same way. For Free-Free Beam Figure-39 Natural frequencies and mode shapes of a Free-Free Beam , 𝛽𝑛 𝑙 β‰… 2𝑛 βˆ’ 1 πœ‹/2 For n 𝛽1 𝑙 = 4.7300 𝛽2 𝑙 = 7.8532 𝛽3 𝑙 = 10.9965 𝛽4 𝑙 = 14.372 We don’t have any reaction force ; I listed below mode shapes and natural frequencies ,
  • 33. 33 n=2 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 7.8532 2 οƒ— 989.279ο€½ n=3 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 10.9956 2 οƒ— 1.939 10 3 ο‚΄ο€½ n=4 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 14.1372 2 οƒ— 3.206 10 3 ο‚΄ο€½ n=5 190 10 9 ο‚΄ 0.000129  80 10 3 ο‚΄ 0.0147οƒ— 3 4    οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ   οƒͺ οƒͺ  οƒΉ οƒΊ οƒΊ  0.5 17.2788 2 οƒ— 4.789 10 3 ο‚΄ο€½ 22:16 Monday April 05 2010 Study name: Study 2 Mode No. Frequency(Rad/sec) Frequency(Hertz) Period(Seconds) 1 0 0 1.00E+32 2 0 0 1.00E+32 3 0 0 1.00E+32 4 0.00067445 0.00010734 9316 5 0.0011889 0.00018922 5284.8 6 0.0015522 0.00024704 4048 7 538.93 85.773 0.011659 8 553.57 88.103 0.01135 9 787.16 125.28 0.0079821 10 1445.4 230.05 0.0043469 11 1542.2 245.45 0.0040741 12 1634.6 260.16 0.0038438 13 2488.3 396.02 0.0025251 14 2717.4 432.48 0.0023122 15 3534 562.45 0.0017779 16 3676.2 585.09 0.0017091 17 4028.3 641.13 0.0015597 18 4091.8 651.23 0.0015356 19 4222.8 672.08 0.0014879 20 4301.4 684.58 0.0014607 21 4647.6 739.69 0.0013519 22 4889.3 778.16 0.0012851 23 5088.4 809.85 0.0012348
  • 34. 34 Solidworks = 0 rd/sc Theoretical = 0 Rd/sc Error = 0 Mode = 0 Figure : 40 Mode Shape 0 for Free-Free Ends Solidworks = 787.16 Theoretical = 989 Rd/sc Error = % 25 Mode = 1 Figure : 41 Mode Shape 1 for Free-Free Ends Solidworks = 1634 Rd/sc Theoretical = 1939 Rd/sc Error = %18 Mode2 Figure : 41 Mode Shape 2 for Free-Free Ends Solidworks = 2488 Rd/sc Theoretical = 3206 Rd/sc Error = %28 Mode = 3 Figure : 42 Mode Shape 3 for Free-Free Ends Solidworks = 4028 Rd/sc Theoretical = 4728 Rd/sc Error = %17 Mode = 4
  • 35. 35 REFERENCES 1. 1. S.S. Rao, Vibration of Continuous Systems, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2007. 2. 2. http://www.me.berkeley.edu/~lwlin/me128/formula.pdf 3. 3. http://www.awc.org/pdf/DA6-BeamFormulas.pdf 4. 4. https://ecourses.ou.edu/cgi-bin/ebook.cgi?doc=&topic=me&chap_sec=fixed&page 5. =&appendix=beams 6. 5. BEAM FORMULAS WITH SHEAR AND MOMENTDIAGRAMS Copyright Β© 2007 American Forest & 7. Paper Association, Inc. 6. VIBRATION PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING TIMOSHENKO SECOND EDITIONFIFTH PRINTING 8.