The following are guidelines for a good mark. 1- The student needs to discuss important aspects
and the background of the case study. 2- The student needs to refer to the code provided at the
end of this document to compare and base it upon his argument. 3- The students make a
conclusion and recommendation. CASE STUDY 1 : Engineer A is in charge of a project to
install a new air conditioning system in order to save energy for his company buildings. A supply
manager from a well-known company learned about the company's intention to install the new
air-conditioning system and decided to invite Engineer A to dinner at a fancy restaurant to
discuss the project details. Discuss the ethical issues that might arise if Engineer A decided to
accept the invitation. [10 marks ] CASE 2 Engineer A, who is employed by a forensic
engineering firm, is called upon to serve as an expert witness in a lawsuit about the quality of
services provided by a manufacturer. Engineer B has the position of engineering manager at this
time. Engineer A testified at trial, based on his extensive background in safety engineering, that
the manufacturing company's safety policies were insufficient and likely led to the injuries
sustained by certain workers. Engineer B, several months later, made comments to the engineers
and others in which he accused Engineer A of acting unprofessionally and unethically, claiming
that Engineer A was biased because he had omitted key details from his testimony and instead
focused on circumstances that benefited his client. Engineer B did not provide any substantive
support for his claim that Engineer A has breached any of his professional duties. If Engineer A
testified as mentioned, is it unethical for Engineer B to comment without evidence that Engineer
A acted unprofessionally and unethically? [10 marks] Please use the ethics code provided on the
next page. Relevant codes Case 1 Section II.4.c. - NSPE. Code of Ethics: Engincers shall not
solicit or accept financial or other valuable consideration, directly or indirectly, from outside
agents in connection with the work for which they are responsible. Section III.2.a. - NSPE Code
of Ethics: Engineers shall seck opportunities to participate in civic affairs; career guidance for
youths; and work for the advancement of the safety, health and well-being of their community.
Section III.5.b. - NSPE Code of Ethics: Enginecrs shall not aceept commissions or allowances,
directly or indirectly, from contractors or other parties dealing with clients or cinployers of the
Enginect in connection with work for which the Engineer is responsible. Section III.9.e. - NSPE
Code of Ethics: Engineers shall continue their professional development throughout their cateers
and shodld kecp current in their specialty fields by engaging in professional practice,
participating in continuing education courves, reading in the technical literature and attending
professional meetings, and seminars Relevant codcs Case? III.8. .
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
The following are guidelines for a good mark- 1- The student needs to.pdf
1. The following are guidelines for a good mark. 1- The student needs to discuss important aspects
and the background of the case study. 2- The student needs to refer to the code provided at the
end of this document to compare and base it upon his argument. 3- The students make a
conclusion and recommendation. CASE STUDY 1 : Engineer A is in charge of a project to
install a new air conditioning system in order to save energy for his company buildings. A supply
manager from a well-known company learned about the company's intention to install the new
air-conditioning system and decided to invite Engineer A to dinner at a fancy restaurant to
discuss the project details. Discuss the ethical issues that might arise if Engineer A decided to
accept the invitation. [10 marks ] CASE 2 Engineer A, who is employed by a forensic
engineering firm, is called upon to serve as an expert witness in a lawsuit about the quality of
services provided by a manufacturer. Engineer B has the position of engineering manager at this
time. Engineer A testified at trial, based on his extensive background in safety engineering, that
the manufacturing company's safety policies were insufficient and likely led to the injuries
sustained by certain workers. Engineer B, several months later, made comments to the engineers
and others in which he accused Engineer A of acting unprofessionally and unethically, claiming
that Engineer A was biased because he had omitted key details from his testimony and instead
focused on circumstances that benefited his client. Engineer B did not provide any substantive
support for his claim that Engineer A has breached any of his professional duties. If Engineer A
testified as mentioned, is it unethical for Engineer B to comment without evidence that Engineer
A acted unprofessionally and unethically? [10 marks] Please use the ethics code provided on the
next page. Relevant codes Case 1 Section II.4.c. - NSPE. Code of Ethics: Engincers shall not
solicit or accept financial or other valuable consideration, directly or indirectly, from outside
agents in connection with the work for which they are responsible. Section III.2.a. - NSPE Code
of Ethics: Engineers shall seck opportunities to participate in civic affairs; career guidance for
youths; and work for the advancement of the safety, health and well-being of their community.
Section III.5.b. - NSPE Code of Ethics: Enginecrs shall not aceept commissions or allowances,
directly or indirectly, from contractors or other parties dealing with clients or cinployers of the
Enginect in connection with work for which the Engineer is responsible. Section III.9.e. - NSPE
Code of Ethics: Engineers shall continue their professional development throughout their cateers
and shodld kecp current in their specialty fields by engaging in professional practice,
participating in continuing education courves, reading in the technical literature and attending
professional meetings, and seminars Relevant codcs Case? III.8. Eagincers shall not attempt to
injure, maliciously or falsely, directly or indirectly, the professional reputation. prospects,
practice or employment of other engineers, nor untruthfully criticize other engineers' work.
Engineers who believe others are guilty of unethical or illegal practice shall preseat such
information to the proper authority for action. III. M. Part I Code is relevant when: Engineer
makes comments about another engineer Code is viotated when: Engineer's comments are an
aftemps to maliciously injure the professional reputation, prospects, practice or employment of
other engineers OR Eagincer's comments are an attempt to falsely injure the profesional
roputation, prospects, practice of employment of other engincers Code is not violated when
Enginecr's comments are not an attempt to maliciously injure the professional reputation,
prospects, practice or employment of other enginecrs AND Engineer's comments are not an
attempt to falsely injure the professional reputation, prospects, practice or employment of other
enginecrs III.8. Part 2 Code is relevant when: Eagineer criticizes another caginecr's work Code is
violated when: Engincer untruthfully criticizes another engineer's work Code is not violated
when Engineer truthfully criticizes another engineer's work 1II.8. Part 3 Code is relevant when:
2. Engineer believes another engineer is guilty of unethical or illegal practice Code is violated
when: Engineer does not tell the proper authority about the suspocted unethical or illegal practice
Code is not violated when Engineer tells the proper authority about the suspected unethical or
illegal practice
![The following are guidelines for a good mark. 1- The student needs to discuss important aspects
and the background of the case study. 2- The student needs to refer to the code provided at the
end of this document to compare and base it upon his argument. 3- The students make a
conclusion and recommendation. CASE STUDY 1 : Engineer A is in charge of a project to
install a new air conditioning system in order to save energy for his company buildings. A supply
manager from a well-known company learned about the company's intention to install the new
air-conditioning system and decided to invite Engineer A to dinner at a fancy restaurant to
discuss the project details. Discuss the ethical issues that might arise if Engineer A decided to
accept the invitation. [10 marks ] CASE 2 Engineer A, who is employed by a forensic
engineering firm, is called upon to serve as an expert witness in a lawsuit about the quality of
services provided by a manufacturer. Engineer B has the position of engineering manager at this
time. Engineer A testified at trial, based on his extensive background in safety engineering, that
the manufacturing company's safety policies were insufficient and likely led to the injuries
sustained by certain workers. Engineer B, several months later, made comments to the engineers
and others in which he accused Engineer A of acting unprofessionally and unethically, claiming
that Engineer A was biased because he had omitted key details from his testimony and instead
focused on circumstances that benefited his client. Engineer B did not provide any substantive
support for his claim that Engineer A has breached any of his professional duties. If Engineer A
testified as mentioned, is it unethical for Engineer B to comment without evidence that Engineer
A acted unprofessionally and unethically? [10 marks] Please use the ethics code provided on the
next page. Relevant codes Case 1 Section II.4.c. - NSPE. Code of Ethics: Engincers shall not
solicit or accept financial or other valuable consideration, directly or indirectly, from outside
agents in connection with the work for which they are responsible. Section III.2.a. - NSPE Code
of Ethics: Engineers shall seck opportunities to participate in civic affairs; career guidance for
youths; and work for the advancement of the safety, health and well-being of their community.
Section III.5.b. - NSPE Code of Ethics: Enginecrs shall not aceept commissions or allowances,
directly or indirectly, from contractors or other parties dealing with clients or cinployers of the
Enginect in connection with work for which the Engineer is responsible. Section III.9.e. - NSPE
Code of Ethics: Engineers shall continue their professional development throughout their cateers
and shodld kecp current in their specialty fields by engaging in professional practice,
participating in continuing education courves, reading in the technical literature and attending
professional meetings, and seminars Relevant codcs Case? III.8. Eagincers shall not attempt to
injure, maliciously or falsely, directly or indirectly, the professional reputation. prospects,
practice or employment of other engineers, nor untruthfully criticize other engineers' work.
Engineers who believe others are guilty of unethical or illegal practice shall preseat such
information to the proper authority for action. III. M. Part I Code is relevant when: Engineer
makes comments about another engineer Code is viotated when: Engineer's comments are an
aftemps to maliciously injure the professional reputation, prospects, practice or employment of
other engineers OR Eagincer's comments are an attempt to falsely injure the profesional
roputation, prospects, practice of employment of other engincers Code is not violated when
Enginecr's comments are not an attempt to maliciously injure the professional reputation,
prospects, practice or employment of other enginecrs AND Engineer's comments are not an
attempt to falsely injure the professional reputation, prospects, practice or employment of other
enginecrs III.8. Part 2 Code is relevant when: Eagineer criticizes another caginecr's work Code is
violated when: Engincer untruthfully criticizes another engineer's work Code is not violated
when Engineer truthfully criticizes another engineer's work 1II.8. Part 3 Code is relevant when:](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/thefollowingareguidelinesforagoodmark-1-thestudentneedsto-230310031130-71c2863f/85/The-following-are-guidelines-for-a-good-mark-1-The-student-needs-to-pdf-1-320.jpg)
