6. “Research, design, and enhance a turbine for a grid scenario
with a high contribution of renewables and be able to
operate in an islanded mode.”
2019 Problem Statement
7. • Work autonomously in a grid scenario
• Consistent, steady power up to
20 m/s windspeed
• 45 cm cubed in volume
• Able to yaw 180º per second, up to 720º
Constraints & Specifications
8. Cut in
• Start producing
power between
wind speeds of
2.5 and 5 m/s
Power Curve
Performance
• Produce stable
power between
wind speeds of 5
to 11m/s
Control of
Rated Power
• Maintain a
proportionality
of rated power
and rpm in high
wind speed
Safety
• Shut down and
restart safely
Durability
• Yaw and
withstand high
speed winds
CWC Testing Procedure
9. Design Issues
• Large hub = smaller blades
• Bulky, non-aerodynamic nacelle
• Generator oversized
Last Year's Design
36. Circuit Design: Variable Load
Circuit is Closed
Turbine
Generates
Power
On
Circuit is Open
Blades Allowed
to Spin Freely
During Startup
Off Circuit is
Shorted
Blade Rotation
Impeded during
Shutdown
Sequence
On
Circuit is Closed
Turbine
Generates
Power
Off
Series MOSFET Parallel MOSFET
52. Cut in
• Start producing
power between
wind speeds of
2.5 and 5 m/s
Power Curve
Performance
• Produce stable
power between
wind speeds of 5
to 11m/s
Control of
Rated Power
• Maintain a
proportionality
of rated power
and rpm in high
wind speed
Safety
• Shut down and
restart safely
Durability
• Yaw and
withstand high
speed winds
Test Runs
53. Cut in
• Start producing
power between
wind speeds of
2.5 and 5 m/s
Power Curve
Performance
• Produce stable
power between
wind speeds of 5
to 11m/s
Control of
Rated Power
• Maintain a
proportionality
of rated power
and rpm in high
wind speed
Safety
• Shut down and
restart safely
Durability
• Yaw and
withstand high
speed winds
Competition Run
61. • Twelve trials evaluated in QBlade
• Graphical Optimization using MATLAB
and Surrogate Assisted Optimization
• Gradient based search optimization in
Excel
13% increase in Cp!
Editor's Notes
KEES
Make table bigger. Make table less specific. Add title. Add yaw slide after this, potential blow up graphic
KEES
KEES
Make it bigger to fill the screen, make a graphic that looks nicer, maybe take out last year's design, add "CWC performance" to the bottom, add "conclusion", add "closing questions"
Emily
Emily
Emily
Enlarge the graphic with detaisl, get rids of words
Emily
Picture should be larger, maybe a different picture.
Nicole
Thanks Emily!
Before we talk about our turbine design, we want to show you where we came from and where we ended.
The turbine design is a legacy project. So when we started designing, we based it off of last year's. We noticed that their turbine had 3 main issues that we could focused on: a large hub= smaller blades, a non-aerodynamic nacelle or housing, and an oversized generator.
With maximizing power as our primary design goal, we divided our design process into 3 parts.
The mechanical system, which captures the wind energy
With maximizing power as our primary design goal, we divided our design process into 3 parts.
The mechanical system, which captures the wind energy
With maximizing power as our primary design goal, we divided our design process into 3 parts.
The mechanical system, which captures the wind energy
Emily
Now, let's start with the mechanical system which captures the wind energy
Nicole
We will start with blades design
Nicole
We will start with blades design
Nicole
This is the hub, which is where all blades attach.
As I mentioned earlier, last year's hub was large with shorter blades.
However, in a wind turbine, power is a function of the area being swept by the blade as they rotate. This means that the longer the blade the more power.
How do we get longer blade with the competition size constraint.
So, we shrank the hub which allowed us to have longer blades.
Nicole
Potentially image on a slide before this to desricbe how and why we changed the blades. Put in image of last year's blades. Make sure to desrcibe everything on this page well.
Nicole
Add the graphic
Add the graphic
Add the graphic
Add the graphic
Add the graphic
Add the graphic
Add the graphic
Add title. Add graphics to demonstrate what part of the system we are currently discussing
Add title. Add graphics to demonstrate what part of the system we are currently discussing
Add title. Add graphics to demonstrate what part of the system we are currently discussing
After all that great work to harness wind energy, we need to convert it to electrical energy. This is the goal of selecting a generator.
For the competition we selected the Titan T8120 as our generator.
It was chosen because of its high power output at high rotational speeds.
While it was a step down from last years design it still may have been a bit too robust.
What it is: A 3 phase drone motor used as a generator
Why it was chosen: High power output with high rotational speeds, it may be too robust for the design
The generator produces an AC voltage source. We chose to rectify, or convert, this to a DC source.
This made it easy to balance the load on the generator, implement all the low voltage circuitry, and a DC output was required by the competition Data Acquisition System.
What it is: Rectification process – converting the generators 3 phase voltage into a DC voltage
Why: This made it easy to balance the load on the generator, implement all the low voltage circuitry and it is required by the competition data acquisition system.
To power our control systems and our programable devices, voltage regulators were used.
They are inefficient but easy to implement. They are designed in conjunction with bypass capacitors to help reduce electrical noise in the circuit.
What it is: 2x IC voltage regulators used in conjunction with bypass capacitors
Why it was chosen: The Arduino and Linear Actuator Board require 5V and 6V respectively. They are easy to implement but are inefficient and the Bypass capacitors help with switching and rectifier noise.
A DC to DC converter was used to charge the competition storage device.
It was chosen specifically for this role and is much more efficient and robust than the voltage regulators. However, it was difficult to implement and it caused some issues during the competition.
What it is: TDK-Lamda DC-to-DC converter
Why it was chosen: While difficult to impliment into the circuit it has a much higher efficency than the voltage regulators and was a perfect fit for the competition storage device.
We implemented a lossless lowpass filter tuned to 100Hz.
This was required at the output of our circuit to the competition data acquisition system to filter circuit noise caused by rectification and switching electronics.
What it is: A lowpass filter designed to roll off at 100Hz.
Why it was chosen: This was required by the competition so rectification and switching noise caused by other parts of the circuit don’t distort the data acquisition system.
A Variable resistor was designed as the load element.
Using voltage controlled current sources, or MOSFETS, in a series and parallel combination we were able to allow our control system to either open the circuit, allowing the blades to spin freely during a startup sequence; or short the circuit, impedding the rotation of the blades duing a shutdown sequence.
What it is: Variable Load resistor
Why it was chosen: The voltage controlled current sources, or MOSFETs are in a parallel and series combination allowing our control system to either open the circuit or short the circuit during startup and shutdown sequences.
Thanh
Thanh
Data Acquisition can be understand as getting data
CLICK
Here, the CS measures Voltage, Current, Power and RPM
These data benefits the algorithm of the CS as well as our testing.
We have on the screen now is the schematic of the CS, the components you see on your right side are sensors we used
The second function of the CS is power control, means it helps the turbine to produce power more efficiently and consistently, to complete the rated-power control task in the competition.
Basically, the control system controls the pitching system to fulfill this function
Let's take a look at the components on the other half of the schematic, on your left side. We have the components for the controlling the pitching system
We call it PROPORTIONAL METHOD
Last but not least, the safety shutdown function. To complete the SAFETY TASK of the competition, which is being able to stop the turbine rotation at any windspeed
A duo effect was used:
commanding the MOSFET to short the circuits, put much more torque on the generator, make too heavy to spin
Commanding the pitching system to form a poor aerodynamic angle on the blades, which looks like this CLICK
KEES
Make table bigger. Make table less specific. Add title. Add yaw slide after this, potential blow up graphic
KEES
Make table bigger. Make table less specific. Add title. Add yaw slide after this, potential blow up graphic
Make table bigger. Make table less specific. Add title. Add yaw slide after this, potential blow up graphic