Presented at GaCOMO 2015, Athens, GA
Open access resources are only becoming more prevalent and more integral to doing research; this is especially true for physics faculty, who have been at the forefront of many open access initiatives. Research shows that graduate students tend to pick up their supervising faculty members’ methods of literature searching—but are physics and astronomy graduate students aware of the status of the open access resources they are using? This presentation covers the findings from a survey of physics and astronomy graduate students at two Atlanta universities and its relevance for librarians serving students in the sciences.
Contact me for the PowerPoint file, including a notes section on each slide, or for further information on my research.
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
Information Literacy & Open Access for Physics Graduate Students
1. Information Literacy & Open
Access for Physics and
Astronomy Graduate Students
Jackie Werner, Science Librarian
Georgia State University
jwerner3@gsu.edu
2. Outline
Background
Open Access & SCOAP3
Open Access in Physics & Astronomy
Faculty and Open Access
Graduate Students and Library Research
Methodology
Results
Discussion
6. SCOAP3
Sponsoring Committee for Open Access Publishing in Particle
Physics
High-Energy Physics partnership
Negotiated with top ten HEP journals to pay fees to make all articles
green open access
4,280 articles published as green OA in 2014, “comprising the
majority of the high-quality peer-reviewed literature in the field of
High-Energy Physics”
7.
8. OA in Physics & Astronomy
arXiv
Founded in 1991
Preprints and OA articles
Multiple disciplines
Most HEP articles appear on arXiv
9. OA in Physics & Astronomy
Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Founded in 1992
Abstract database including
arXiv & traditional journals
Includes OA and non
Digitizes older publications
10. OA in Physics & Astronomy
INSPIRE-HEP
Replaced SPIRES in 2012
Searches arXiv & HEP resources
Curated content in HEP
Includes OA and non
11. OA in Physics & Astronomy
CERN Document Server (CDS)
Covers all CERN publications
Searches arXiv & other HEP
publications
Includes OA and non
12. OA in Physics & Astronomy
Google Scholar
Not technically OA, but…
13. Faculty and Open Access
HEP researchers support open access
Scientists are aware of open access
Faculty & graduate students recognize what is open access
14. Graduate Students and Library
Research
Graduate students turn to faculty advisors and lab group for
literature searches
…if they receive instruction at all
Are graduate students aware of open access?
16. Methodology
Conducted at Georgia Institute of Technology and Georgia State
University
Interviewed graduate coordinator for Physics and Astronomy
program
Sent survey to all Physics & Astronomy graduate students
18. Q8. Have you ever received
training or asked for help on how
to search for physics articles in
graduate school?
• No
• Yes, in graduate courses
• Yes, by advisor
• Yes, by a librarian speaking to a group
• Yes, but only after asking a professor/librarian
• Yes, somewhere else
19. Information Literacy Instruction –
Faculty
Graduate students given practice with oral presentation and
published papers
Information literacy instruction and practice depends on graduate
advisors
No library orientation for graduate students?
21. Information Literacy Instruction –
Graduate Students
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
None Graduate
Courses
Advisor Librarian After asking Fellow
Students
Other
22. Q6. Are you aware of open
access (OA)?
1. Never heard of it
2. Heard the term, but don’t know what it means
3. Yes, somewhat aware
4. Yes, very aware
5. Yes, and I keep up with news and developments in
open access
23. Open Access – Faculty
Library faculty advisory board spent year educating campus on
open access
Official stance open access publication is encouraged, but not
required
Students may not know which resources library is paying for
24. Open Access – Graduate Students
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Never heard of it Heard of the term,
don't know what it
means
Yes, somewhat
aware
Yes, very aware Yes, and I keep up
with news and
development in
open access
25. Open Access – Graduate Students
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4+
AverageAwarenessofOA(1-5)
Years in program
26. Q9. Have you published a peer-
reviewed article while in
graduate school?
Q10. How many peer-reviewed articles have you
published while in graduate school?
Q11. How many peer-reviewed articles have you
submitted while in graduate school, but are not yet
published?
Q12. Where is your article(s) currently available?
27. Publication – Faculty
Some faculty “take it as their responsibility” to have students write
papers, others don’t
Publication is not required for graduation
28. Publication – Graduate Students
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Yes Accepted, but not yet
published
Submitted, but not yet
accepted
No or not yet submitted
31. Q5. Are you aware of these
resources and do you use them
to find physics and/or astronomy
articles?
1. Never heard of
2. Aware of but don’t use/use rarely
3. Aware of and use
4. Use frequently
32. Resources Used – Faculty
“Everybody uses [arXiv] without fail.”
Many faculty don’t use journals and don’t care about final
publication
33. Resources Used – Graduate Students
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
ADS arXiv CDS Google Google
Scholar
SPIRES Web of
Science
Familiarity/Useofresource(1-4)
Resource Use - Average
34. Resources Used – Graduate Students
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
ADS arXiv CDS Google Google
Scholar
SPIRES Web of
Science
Numberofrespondents
Resource Use - Simplified
yes (3-4) n (1-2)
35. Resources Used – Graduate Students
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4+
AverageAwareness&UseofarXiv(1-4)
Years in program
Use of arXiv
36. Q13. How do you keep up
with new developments and
publications in your field?
37. Keeping Up – Faculty
“Everybody uses [arXiv] without fail.”
Faculty get Table of Contents from journals
Students mostly use Google Scholar—”as good as any search
engine we pay for”
Faculty and students encouraged to keep up in person
(conferences, etc.)
38. Keeping Up – Graduate Students
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Individual
Journals
Google
Scholar
In-Person arXiv Readcube RSS Doesn't
39. Q14. How do you think methods
of keeping up with new
developments and /or
publications in your field will
change in the next five years?
40. Changes in Five Years
No “dramatic changes”
Aggregation
“Scientific community similar to LinkedIn”
Improvements to existing resources
“Wider recognition of open access journals”
41. Takeaways
We don’t know how graduate students do research
Open access resources may serve students’ needs
…but students don’t know what library resources do
Many questions still to ask
42. References
Catalano, A. (2011). Patterns of graduate students' information seeking
behavior: A meta-synthesis of
the literature. Journal of Documentation, 69(2): 243-274.
George, C., Bright, A., Hurlbert, T., Linke, E.C., St. Clair, G., & Stein, J. (2006).
Scholarly use of information: Graduate students' information seeking
behaviour. Information Research, 11(4): paper 272. Retrieved from
http://InformationR.net/ir/11-4/paper272.html.
Gentil-Beccot, A., Mele, S., & Brooks, T.C. (2009). Citing and reading
behaviours in high-energy physics: How a community stopped worrying about
journals and learned to love repositories. Scientometrics, 84(2), 345-355.
Ginsparg, P. (1994). First steps towards electronic research communication.
Computers in Physics, 8(2), 390-396.
Hemminger, B.M., Lu, D., Vaughan, K.T.L., Adams, S.J. (2007). Information
seeking behavior of academic students. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 58(14): 2205-2225.
43. References
Jamali, H.R. & Nicholas, D. (2006). Communication and information-seeking
behaviour of research students in physicist and astronomy. ASIST Annual
Conference, 3-8 November 2006, Austin, Texas.
Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., Bergeron, P. (2013). In their own image? A
comparison of doctoral students' and faculty members' referencing behavior.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
64(5): 1045-1054.
Park, J. (2007). Motivations for web-based scholarly publishing: Do scientists
recognize open availability as an advantage? Journal of Scholarly Publishing,
40(4): 343-369.
Suber, P. (2013). Open Access Overview. Retrieved from
http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm (June 22, 2015).
SCOAP^3 high-energy physics open access initiative
“Open-access (OA) literature is digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions.” – Peter Suber
Image: http://www.openaccessweek.org/page/englishhigh-resolution-1
Two types of OA: green & gold
gold OA journals publishing OA papers, green repositories making available papers that have been published elsewhere
going to be discussing mostly green, but w/some aspects of gold
Image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_access.svg
“thousands of libraries, funding agencies and research centers in more than 40 countries”
high-energy physics, aka particle physics – large hadron collider, higgs boson
OA especially important in HEP b/c of huge number of authors & importance of outside/government funding
Quote source: http://scoap3.org/what-is-scoap3
Website: http://repo.scoap3.org/
Physicists emailed preprints to each other starting in 1990, but too many
funded by cornell, grants, member institutions
preprints referred to as eprints
started physics, included astronomy, mathematics, computer science, nonlinear science, quantitative biology, & statistics
1,078,7791,078,779 articles as of Monday
not peer-reviewed, but moderators delete non-papers. Most published, some not- 2002 proof of Thurston's geometrization conjecture only on arXiv, influential
Website: arxiv.org
Image source: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/european-research-council-funds-arxiv-online-pre-print-physics-and-math-papers-repository/
developed by NASA to better allow astrophysicists to keep up w/literature
includes astronomy & physics – originally astro, then added physics & preprint – most usage in astronomy
links preprints w/published papers
Website & image source: http://adswww.harvard.edu/
SPIRES Stanford Physics Information Retrieval System – created in 1969, 1st North American website, 1st database available through WWW
interacts w/other HEP resources
Website & image source: https://inspirehep.net/?ln=en
CERN: European Organization for Nuclear Research – LHC, created WWW in 1989
aims to be database for all high-energy physics publications
Website: https://cds.cern.ch/?ln=en
Image source: http://www.caen.it/csite/CaenProfList.jsp?parent=171&Preview=Y
also includes arXiv preprints
Website: scholar.google.com
Image source: http://library.franklin.edu/about-us/library-news/how-to-use-google-scholar-to-find-articles
arXiv & other eprints staples of HEP since 1990s
HEP has used preprints as primary means of communication since 1970s
Gentil-Bercot, Merle, & Brooks (2009): in 2008, 38% of arXiv HEP articles only on HEP, no published elsewhere
Park (2009): researchers marked “visibility” & “changes from traditional publishing” as strongest points in favor of OA
Hemminger, Lu, Vaughn, & Adams (2007): faculty & grad students distinguish between content offered through library & free content – doesn’t cover OA resources listed w/library databases
research generally on citation impact and publishing, not as consumers of OA
George et al (2006): grad students at Carnegie mellon – 100% grad students in scientists get info seeking/research help from faculty, 69% from students, 46% from library
Catalano’s 2011 review: grad students turn to faculty advsiors, who pass on good or bad searching skills
Boote & Beile’s 2005 review (cited in Larivière, Sugimoto, & Bergeron) – advisors assume doctoral students know how to search already, don’t instruct
v. little on grad students & open access
Jamali & Nicholas, 2006: phys astro grad students know preprints not peer reviewed & put extra emphasis on evaluating them
*All PhD in physics
*5 specialization in biophysics, 3 nonlinear dynamics
student training in oral presentation @talks & conferences (regional to international) up to individual advisors
involve students in different levels w/writing for refereed journals & conference proceedings
grad advisor used to schedule library orientation to tell new grad students about resources—may do direct email now, but unknown
Check all that apply
Check all that apply
”Oh, yes.”
grad advisor head of library faculty advisory board—met w/every department for one-hour presentation on OA
faculty members have right to opt out
individual schools don’t have policy, not asked to make
Google Scholar integrates so well that students may not know – access to papers invisible w/ip on campus
Check all that apply
5 have neither published nor submitted (3 <1 year)
N = 16
Check all that apply
Never heard of
Aware of but don’t use/use rarely
Aware of and use
Use frequently
Never heard of
Aware of but don’t use/use rarely
Aware of and use
Use frequently
Never heard of
Aware of but don’t use/use rarely
Aware of and use
Use frequently
Readcube – mobile PDF organizer w/daily article recommendations & article access through institution
In-person: conferences & talking to others
prof & student – no changes – mobile most recent change
email summary of all relevant publications in all journals (databases can do this)
central website that compiles
science linked in that makes collaboration easier - mendeley
will be continuing research at GSU and further studies
info lit up to individual faculty members means no standards – pass on poor research skills to students
if google scholar gets most recent stuff from arXiv, library databases needed?
questions: do students learn more as time goes on? astronomy students? Other sciences where oa doesn’t cover so much? Schools w/different policies/schoolwide oa programs?