2. OGHFA 1_HP_06_VIS_Error Management 2
Normal operations:
• threats and errors
• deviations
• failures and successes
Accidents
Serious incidents
Minor incidents
Frequency of event, Quantity of data
Severity
of
event
3. OGHFA 1_HP_06_VIS_Error Management 3
Frequency of event, Quantity of data
Severity
of
event
Normal operations:
• threats and errors
• deviations
• failures and successes
Accidents
Serious incidents
Minor incidents
Normal operations:
• threats and errors
• deviations
• failures and successes
4. OGHFA 1_HP_06_VIS_Error Management 4
LOSA (Line Operations Safety Audit) results:
More than 70% of flights had at least one error or violation
About 30% of errors/violations were mismanaged or
consequential
Leading to “undesired aircraft state” or another
error/violation
Courtesy of University of Texas. Based on 3309 flights.
5. OGHFA 1_HP_06_VIS_Error Management 5
This presentation is about coping with
errors in normal operations, typically detected
with flight operations monitoring tools,
It is not about incidents, usually subject to a detailed
investigation.
9. OGHFA 1_HP_06_VIS_Error Management 9
Intention to achieve something
Good plan
Action “on autopilot”
Unintended deviation from plan
Several error mechanisms, for example:
“Strong but wrong” habits
Inaccuracies
10. OGHFA 1_HP_06_VIS_Error Management 10
The climb is getting bumpy…
Radar was off!
Predictive windshear had been set to “auto”
Radar remained off
19. OGHFA 1_HP_06_VIS_Error Management 19
There is a very loose coupling between an error and
negative consequences
Other factors shape the outcome
Especially true in aviation
Nevertheless…
20. OGHFA 1_HP_06_VIS_Error Management 20
Flaps not set for takeoff (lapse)
Aircraft type and performance?
Actual takeoff weight?
Runway length?
Obstructions ahead?
Takeoff
configuration
warning?
29. OGHFA 1_HP_06_VIS_Error Management 29
Error Prevention
Where reasonable and where doing so does not
increase other risks, remove an error-prone task
by (re)design of system, procedure or process.
35. OGHFA 1_HP_06_VIS_Error Management 35
Optimizing
violations
The “Lethal
Cocktail”
Expectation that rules will
have to be bent to get the job
done
Feeling of Powerfulness:
above-average people need
not follow all procedures
Opportunities to “short cut”
Inadequate Planning, forcing
people to improvise
Routine
violations
36. OGHFA 1_HP_06_VIS_Error Management 36
Optimizing
violations
Remove the need to Violate
Adequate planning
Capability to adapt to new
demands
Open communication
Safety Culture
Routine
violations
37. OGHFA 1_HP_06_VIS_Error Management 37
Can’t we hold people responsible for their mistakes and
violations?
Real safety enhancement usually comes from systemic
solutions
Not from actions at the individual level
Situation where a person really has to be removed from
operation is very rare