2. Rationalization
The action of making a
process more efficient.
The action of
reorganizing a process
or system so as to
make it more logical
and consistent.
3. Current State of the Local Planning in
the Philippines
83% Functionality of the Local
Development Councils
More than 97% of LGUs
formulated Plans (CDP, CLUP,
AIP)
4. Current State of the Local Planning in
the Philippines
Indifferent or unsupportive
Sanggunian
5. Current State of the Local Planning in
the Philippines
Poor or total
absence of
vertical linkages
Poor or total
absence of
horizontal linkages
among sectoral
concerns
Social
Development
Economic
Development
Infrastructure
Development
Environment
and Natural
Resources
Institutional
Development
National
Government
Regional
Government
Provincial
Government
City/Municipal/Brgy
Government Unit
6. Current State of the Local Planning in
the Philippines
Weak plan – to –
budget linkage
CDP
7. Current State of the Local Planning in
the Philippines
Multiplicity of Plans
ICT
Plan
Gender &
Develop
ment
Plan
Small &
Medium
Enterpris
e
Develop
ment
Plan
Forest
Manage
ment
Plan
FSP
Solid
Waste
Managem
ent Plan
Local
Poverty
Reducti
on
Action
Plan
Traffic
Manag
ement
Plan
8. Current State of the Local Planning in
the Philippines
Not all of the 33 NGA-
Mandated Plans/Prescribed
Sectoral and Thematic Plans
have been formulated.
No sanctions anyway
Plans were not considered
necessary or beneficial
Repetitive
No focal person to steer the plan
formulation process
10. Rationalized Planning
Need to implement the full
implications of the Local
Government Code of 1991
pertaining to planning.
Reduce the number of plans that
LGUs must prepare to the two
comprehensive plans (CLUP and
CDP) that are mandated in the
Code.
11. The need for NGAs that are
directly involved in local planning
to harmonize or dovetail their
planning guidelines.
Reconfiguring the planning
process from its traditional
technocratic form into one that
accommodates the imperatives
of multi-stakeholder participation
and consultation.
National
Government
Agencies
Regional
Government
Provincial
Government
City/Municipality/Baran
gay Government
Rationalized Planning
12. Rationalized Planning
Emphasizes the importance of
strengthening the LDC as the
mandated structure to formulate
development plans in the LGU,
organization of functional
committees to assist the LDC in
the development of the plan;
13. Rationalized Planning
Underscores the importance of
the legislative body as partners
of the executive branch in
advancing the general welfare of
its constituents, thus both have
important roles to play in
planning for their jurisdictions;
14. Rationalized Planning
Promotes the development of a
medium term CDP (6 years) to
align with the MTPDP and
MTPIP, and a term-based CDP
(3 years) which becomes the
LGU’s ELA.
Philippine
Developme
nt Plan
Public
Investment
Program
Comprehensive
Development
Plan
15. Policies and Guidelines
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 366, s. 2004: Directing a
strategic review of the operations and organizations
of the executive branch and providing options and
incentives for government employees who may be
affected by the rationalization of the functions and
agencies of the executive branch
16. Policies and Guidelines
DILG-HLURB Joint Memorandum Circular (JMC)
No. 001 Series of 2009: Guidelines on the
Harmonization of Comprehensive Land Use Plan
(CLUP) and Comprehensive Development Plan
(CDP) Preparation, dated 19 October 2009;
17. Policies and Guidelines
DILG MC No. 2015-77: Guidelines on Mainstreaming
Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk
Reduction in Local Development Planning;
DILG, NEDA, DBM and DOF Joint Memorandum
Circular (JMC)No. 2016-01: Updated Guidelines on
the Harmonization of Local Planning, Investment
Programming, Resource Mobilization, Budgeting,
Expenditure Management, and Performance
Monitoring and Coordination in Fiscal Oversight;
18. Policies and Guidelines
DILG-NEDA JMC No. 1 Series of 2018: Guidelines
on the Localization of the Philippine Development
Plan (PDP) 2017-2022 Results Matrices and the
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG).
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 138, S. 2021: Full
devolution of certain functions of the executive
branch to local governments, creation of a committee
on devolution, and for other purposes
20. Planning as an integral part of
Governance
Planning must be
viewed holistically as a
system.
Governance
Planning
21. Dual Function of the LGU
As a Political Unit
LGUs are in charge of the
management of its entire
geographical territory for and
in behalf of the national
government
22. Dual Function of the LGU
As a Corporate Body
Representing its inhabitants;
Promoting the general welfare among
the inhabitants within its territorial
jurisdiction, (Sec. 16, RA 7160) and
Delivering basic services & facilities to
enable its inhabitants to develop fully
into self-reliant communities (Sec. 17,
RA 7160)
LGUs
shall
promote
health
and
safety
ensure and
support the
preservation
and
enrichment
of culture
improve
public
morals
preserve
the comfort
and
convenienc
e of their
inhabitants
maintai
n peace
and
order
promote
full
employme
nt
enhance
economic
prosperity
and social
justice
encourage and
support the
development of
appropriate and
self-reliant
scientific and
technological
capabilities
enhance the
right of the
people to a
balanced
ecology
23. Components of the Local Planning
System
• Who should be
planning?
The Organizational Structure and its
functions
• Why should LGUs
plan?
The plan or plans that the planning structure
is mandated to produce
• How are plans
prepared?
The process that the planning structure will
follow to produce the desired plan outputs
• How can LGU plans
be implemented?
The tools for plan implementation
24. Components of Local Planning Structure
Political Component
Its the policy-making body
which defines the content and
direction of local development.
The principal function of the
political component is that of
deliberation to take decisions
or lay down policies.
Technical Component
This component supplies the
technical content and process
of local planning. Except for
some local special bodies, the
technical component generally
has no decision-making
powers.
LOCAL
PLANNING
SYSTEM
25. Comprehensive Development Plan
The document that pertains to the multi-sectoral plan
formulated at the city/municipal level, which embodies the
vision, sectoral goals, objectives, development strategies
and policies within the term of LGU officials and the
medium-term. It contains corresponding PPAs which
serve as primary inputs to investment programming and
subsequent budgeting and implementation of projects for
the growth and development of local government
territories.
LOCAL
PLANNING
SYSTEM
26. Comprehensive Land Use Plan
The CLUP is a planning document prepared by LGUs to
rationalize the allocation and proper use of land resources.
It projects public and private land uses in accordance with
the future spatial organization of economic and social
activities.
Under the LGC of 1991 and other pertinent laws, all LGUs
are mandated to continue to prepare/revise/update their
comprehensive land use plan which shall be enacted
through a zoning ordinance.
LOCAL
PLANNING
SYSTEM
27. CLUP vs. CDP
CLUP CDP
9 years 6 years
Spatial Sectoral
"Comprehensive" encompassing territorial jurisdiction
between land and water
"Comprehensive" embracing all development sectors and
sub-sectors and concerns of each
Defines the policy direction for the use of land resources
within territorial jurisdiction
Outlines specific application of the available land
resources
Accounts for available supply of land resources
Demand for land resources based on sectoral
development goals
Has four (4) policy areas: production settlements,
protection and infrastructure
Covers 5 development sectors: social, economic, physical,
environmental, institutional
Diagrams the desired physical pattern of growth of the
locality
Provide convergence mechanism to integrate NGA's plans
with local plans
Invariably takes a long time to carry out
Short timeframe and should be used as a medium to
implement the CLUP
Local equivalent or counterpart of the N/R/PPFP Must coincide with the MTPDP/MTPIP
LOCAL
PLANNING
SYSTEM
28. The CLUP-CDP Process Flow
Chart prepared by Ernesto M. Serote
LOCAL
PLANNING
SYSTEM
29. Implementation tools
CDP CLUP
Tax Zoning Ordinance
Schemes (i.e. PPP) Eminent Domain
Indebtedness Tax
Income from National
Shares
Public Capital
Investments
Co-Management
LOCAL
PLANNING
SYSTEM
31. Components of Local Planning Structure
POLITICAL TECHNICAL
Local Sanggunian
Local Development Council
Congressman’s
Representative
Civil Society Organizations
Local Planning and
Development Office
LGU Department Heads
Local Special Bodies
LDC Sectoral/Functional
Committees
NGA Office Chiefs in the
locality
Private Sector Representatives
32. The Local
Planning
Structure and
its Functions
Local
Development
Council
Executive
Committee
Sectoral or
Functional
Committees
• Social
• Economic
• Infrastructure
• Environment and
Natural Resources
• Institutional
Secretariat
33. Local
Development
Council
Executive
Committee
Sectoral or
Functional
Committees
• Social
• Economic
• Infrastructure
• Environment and
Natural Resources
• Institutional
Secretariat
LDC:
• Formulate development plans and policies;
• Formulate public investment programs;
• Appraise and prioritize programs and projects;
• Formulate investment incentives;
• Coordinate, monitor and evaluate implementation
of development programs and projects.
Barangay Development Councils:
• Mobilize people’s participation in local
development functions;
• Prepare barangay development plans;
• Monitor and evaluate implementation of national
or local programs and projects.
Primary Functions
34. Local
Development
Council
Executive
Committee
Sectoral or
Functional
Committees
• Social
• Economic
• Infrastructure
• Environment and
Natural Resources
• Institutional
Secretariat
Executive Committee:
• Represent the LDC when it is not in session;
• Ensure that the LDC decisions are faithfully
carried out and act on matters needing immediate
attention by the LDC;
• Formulate plans, policies and programs based on
principles and priorities laid out by LDC.
Secretariat:
• Provide technical support to the LDC;
• Document proceedings;
• Prepare reports;
• Other support functions as may be necessary.
Primary Functions
35. Local
Development
Council
Executive
Committee
Sectoral or
Functional
Committees
• Social
• Economic
• Infrastructure
• Environment and
Natural Resources
• Institutional
Secretariat
Sectoral or Functional Committee:
• Assist the LDC in the performance of its
functions;
• Provide the LDC with data and information
essential to the formulation of plans, programs
and activities;
• Define sectoral or functional objectives, set
targets and identify programs, projects and
activities;
• Collate and analyze data and conduct studies;
• Conduct public hearings on sectoral planning,
projects and activities;
• Monitor and evaluate programs and projects; and
• Perform functions assigned by the LDC.
Primary Functions
36. The Local
Development
Council
Local
Development
Council
Executive
Committee
Sectoral or
Functional
Committees
• Social
• Economic
• Infrastructure
• Environment and
Natural Resources
• Institutional
Secretariat
The Local Development Council (LDC) is a
special body created under the Local
Government Code of 1991 to assist the local
legislative body in setting the direction of the
economic and social development of the local
government unit and to coordinate
development efforts within its territorial
jurisdiction.
37. Local
Development
Council
Executive
Committee
Sectoral or
Functional
Committees
• Social
• Economic
• Infrastructure
• Environment and
Natural Resources
• Institutional
Secretariat
Local Development Council Members
Provincial – Headed by the Governor
1. All mayors of component cities and
municipalities;
2. The chairman of the committee on
appropriations of the sangguniang
panlalawigan;
3. The congressman or his representative;
and
4. Representatives of NGOs operating in
the province, who shall constitute not
less than one-fourth (1 /4) of the
members of the fully organized council.
38. Local
Development
Council
Executive
Committee
Sectoral or
Functional
Committees
• Social
• Economic
• Infrastructure
• Environment and
Natural Resources
• Institutional
Secretariat
Local Development Council Members
City/Municipal – Headed by the Mayor
1. All punong barangays in the city or
municipality;
2. The chairman of the committee on
appropriations of the sangguniang
panlungsod or sangguniang bayan
concerned;
3. The congressman or his representative;
and
4. Representatives of NGOs operating in
the city or municipality, as the case may
be, who shall constitute not less than
one-fourth (1/4) of the members of the
fully organized council.
39. Local
Development
Council
Executive
Committee
Sectoral or
Functional
Committees
• Social
• Economic
• Infrastructure
• Environment and
Natural Resources
• Institutional
Secretariat
Local Development Council Members
Barangay – Headed by the Punong
Barangay
1. Members of the sangguniang barangay;
2. SK Chairperson
3. Representatives of NGOs operating in
the barangay, who shall constitute not
less than one-fourth (1/4) of the
members of the fullyorganized council.
4. A representative of the congressman.
40. Local
Development
Council
Executive
Committee
Sectoral or
Functional
Committees
• Social
• Economic
• Infrastructure
• Environment and
Natural Resources
• Institutional
Secretariat
Local Development Council Functions
Provincial / City / Municipal
FORMULATE
• Plans and Policies
• Annual Public Investment Programs
• Investment Incentives
COORDINATE
• Implementation of Development Programs
and Projects
EVALUATE
• Programs and Projects
41. Local
Development
Council
Executive
Committee
Sectoral or
Functional
Committees
• Social
• Economic
• Infrastructure
• Environment and
Natural Resources
• Institutional
Secretariat
Local Development Council Functions
Barangay
MOBILIZE
• People’s participation
FORMULATE
• Barangay Development Plan
MONITOR AND EVALUATE
• Implementation of Programs and Projects
42. The
Executive
Committee
Local
Development
Council
Executive
Committee
Sectoral or
Functional
Committees
• Social
• Economic
• Infrastructure
• Environment and
Natural Resources
• Institutional
Secretariat
The provincial, city, municipal, or barangay
development council shall, by resolution and
within three (3) months from the date of
reorganization of the LDC, create an
executive committee to represent and act in
behalf of the LDC when the latter is not in
session.
43. Local
Development
Council
Executive
Committee
Sectoral or
Functional
Committees
• Social
• Economic
• Infrastructure
• Environment and
Natural Resources
• Institutional
Secretariat
Executive Committee Members
Provincial
1. Governor ~ Chaiman
2. City/Municipal Mayor’s
representative
3. Chairman of the committee on
appropriations
4. President of the provincial liga
5. NGO representative
47. Local
Development
Council
Executive
Committee
Sectoral or
Functional
Committees
• Social
• Economic
• Infrastructure
• Environment and
Natural Resources
• Institutional
Secretariat
Sectoral or Functional Committees
• Each LDC Member to participate in
Sectoral/functional committees
• Sectoral/Functional Committee to establish
direct connection with NGAs
Functions:
1. Provide data and information
2. Define planning details; Objectives,
targets, etc.
3. Provide analysis for information
4. Conduct public hearings
5. Coordinate
6. Monitor and Evaluate
49. Sectoral Committees
Core Technical
Working Group
(Must be there)
Expanded Technical
Working Group
(Nice to have around)
Full-Blown Sectoral
Committee
(The more the merrier)
Social Development
Composed of Local
Government officials and
functionaries whose
tasks and
responsibilities address
the concerns of the
particular sector directly
or indirectly.
Other LGU officials,
national government
agencies operating in
the locality, and
important non-
government
organizations with
functions and
advocacies touching on
the concerns of the
particular sector. When
added to the core TWG
the resulting body
becomes the Expanded
TWG.
Other groups and
individuals, mainly from
non-government sectors,
who have a stake in
local development in
whatever capacity,
enrich and enliven the
full-blown committee’s
deliberations with their
varied views, agendas,
and advocacies.
Economic Development
Physical/Land use
Development
Environmental
Management
Institutional
Development
SUGGESTED SECTORAL COMMITTEE
COMPOSITION
50. Social Development
Core Technical
Working Group
(Must be there)
Expanded Technical Working
Group
(Nice to have around)
Full-Blown Sectoral
Committee
(The more the merrier)
• MPDO Staff
• SWDO
• MHO
• POSO
• LDC Rep (brgy)
• LDC Rep (CSO)
• District Supervisor
• PTA Federation
• Sanggunian Rep
• Police Chief
• Fire Marshall
• Local Civil Registrar
Population Officer
• PCUP
• Nutrition Officer
• Housing Board Rep
• NSO
• Manager GSIS/SSS
• Sports Organizations
• Religious Leaders
• Labor Groups
• Senior Citizens
• Media Reps
• YMCA/YWCA
• Inner Wheel Club
• School Principals
• Charitable Organizations
51. Economic Development
Core Technical
Working Group
(Must be there)
Expanded Technical Working
Group
(Nice to have around)
Full-Blown Sectoral
Committee
(The more the merrier)
• PESO
• Agriculturist
• Tourism Officer
• Coop Devt Officer
• MPDO Staff
• LDC Rep (brgy)
• LDC Rep (CSO)
• Sanggunian Rep
• DTI Representative
• Chambers of Commerce &
Industry
• Trade Unions
• Bank Managers
• Market Vendors
• Sidewalk Vendors
• Cooperatives
• Transport Orgs
• Lions Club
• Jaycees
• Rotary Club
• Academe
• Other interested groups
• and individuals
52. Physical/Land Use Development
Core Technical
Working Group
(Must be there)
Expanded Technical Working
Group
(Nice to have around)
Full-Blown Sectoral
Committee
(The more the merrier)
• Municipal Engineer
• Zoning Officer
• MPDO Staff
• LDC Rep (brgy)
• LDC Rep (CSO)
• Sanggunian Rep
• Municipal Architect
• Electric Coop Rep
• Water District Rep
• Real Estate Developers
• Professional organizations
• Telecommunications
companies
• Academe
• Other interested groups and
individuals
53. Environmental Management
Core Technical
Working Group
(Must be there)
Expanded Technical Working
Group
(Nice to have around)
Full-Blown Sectoral
Committee
(The more the merrier)
• MPDO Staff
• LDC Rep (brgy)
• LDC Rep (CSO)
• General Services Head
• LG-ENRO
• Sanggunian Rep
• Sanitary Inspector
• CENRO
• PENRO
• FARMC Reps
• BFAR Rep
• Heads of private hospitals
• Academe
• Environmental Advocates
• Other interested groups and
individuals
54. Institutional Development
Core Technical
Working Group
(Must be there)
Expanded Technical Working
Group
(Nice to have around)
Full-Blown Sectoral
Committee
(The more the merrier)
• MPDO Staff
• LDC Rep (brgy)
• LDC Rep (CSO)
• LGOO
• Local Administrator
• Sanggunian Rep
• HRDO
• Treasurer
• Budget Officer
• Assessor
• Academe
• Religious groups
• Good Governance
advocates
• Other interested groups and
individuals
55. Local
Development
Council
Executive
Committee
Sectoral or
Functional
Committees
• Social
• Economic
• Infrastructure
• Environment and
Natural Resources
• Institutional
Secretariat
• Provide both technical and administrative
support
• Assist with documentation
• Provide other type of assistance
Provincial / City / Municipal
• Local Planning and Development
Coordinators
Barangay
• Barangay Secretary
• City/Municipal Planning and Development
Coordinator
Secretariat
56. The Local Planning and Development Office
Functions:
1. Formulate integrated economic, social, physical, and other
development plans and policies;
2. Conduct continuing studies, research, and training programs;
3. Integrate and coordinate all sectoral plans and studies;
4. Monitor and evaluate the implementation of the different development
programs, projects, and activities;
5. Prepare comprehensive development plans and other development
planning documents;
6. Analyze the income and expenditure patterns, and formulate and
recommend fiscal plans and policies;
7. Promote people participation in development planning; and
8. Exercise supervision and control over the secretariat of the LDC.
57. The Local Planning and Development Office
Group Functions:
1. Information management
2. Comprehensive and multi-sectoral planning
3. Investment programming
4. Public participation promotion
5. Secretariat services to LDC
58. Local Planning and
Development Coordinator
Administrative Support
Public Information and
Advocacy Service
Deputy Local Planning and
Development Coordinator
Planning Information
Management Division
Planning and
Programming Division
Social Development
Coordinator
Geographic Information
Section
Monitoring and Evaluation
Section
Statistical Database
Section
Special Studies and
Research Section
CLUP Updating and
Revision Specialist
CDP Formulation
Specialist
LDP & AIP Preparation
Specialist
Sectoral Coordination and
People Participation Division
Economic Development
Coordinator
Land use & infrastructure
Development Coordinator
Environmental
Management Coordinator
Institutional Development
Coordinator
Local
Planning
and
Development
Office
59. Ideal Core Planning Team
1. knowledge of the following:
a. planning process; and
b. development and governance concepts and principles
2.skills in:
a. planning
b. problem analysis,
c. technical writing, and
d. communications, and networking
3.knowledge, understanding of and sensitivity to critical development themes which
LGUs are mandated to incorporate in their local plans such as:
a. poverty,
b. environment,
c. gender, and
d. peace
4.talent and proficiency in consultation processes; and
5.willingness to work with others
60. Non-Government Sector Participation
Partnership between LGU and Peoples/NGO
Joint-ventures / Cooperative arrangement
One-fourth (1/4) of LDC
Accreditation
Sectoral committees
61. Sources:
Rationalizing the Local Planning System, 1st Edition, DILG-BLGD, 2008
Local Planning Illustrative Guide, DILG & European Union
DILG MC No. 2008-156, Guide to CDP preparation for LGU
CLUP Guidebook, Volume 1, 2013
Primer on Barangay Development Planning, DILG-NBOO, 2020
Baseline Study on Policy and Governance Gaps for the Local
Government Support Fund Assistance to Municipalities (LGSF-AM)
Program, Philippine Institute for Development Studies, 2020
https://www.region6.dilg.gov.ph/index.php/programs/35-programs/117-
rps
By efficient means - achieving maximum productivity with minimum wasted effort or expense.
In connection to planning, rationalization tells us about how we can make our process or the overall planning system aligned and consistent with other plans whether from the government units or other sectoral plans.
From the book published by the DILG, the local planning in the Philippines was characterized as chaotic and defined Rationalized Planning as the best course of action the Philippine may go through to put order this chaos.
Before we proceed to why rationalize, let’s have a bird’s eye view of the planning status quo in the Philippines.
In 2017, DILG-BLGS profiling of Development Council Functionality shows a regional average score of 83% and more than 97% in terms of plans formulated.
*1,715 LGUS covered
Catch:
LDC Functionality:
Region 7 (Central Visayas) – 71.8%
ARMM – 35%
LGU Plans formulation
ARMM – 60%
One of the recommendation from COA on their Audit last 2017 was to secure the support of the local Sanggunian (local legislative body) in the planning and prioritization of development projects.
This is a result of the COA audit which suggest that in 2016, LGUs did not utilize the mandated amount for development projects. Underutilization of the
appropriated Local Development Fund was possibly because of poor planning, monitoring and prioritization.
Though it is recognized that LGUs have the authority to identify local priorities, there have been efforts in recent years to align the LDIPs with national priorities such as the Philippine Development Plan (PDP) 2017 – 2022.
One of the reasons for the need for alignment is that local governments are envisioned as partners of the national government in development (Republic of the Philippines 1991, Sec. 2). Another possible reason for strengthening linkages of national/regional/provincial development plans with CDPs is to align national government assistance to LGUs.
Budget for plans were not properly utilized, for example, Local Development Funds were used to fund other projects. This is because some LGUs does not have strong Financial Management. Another reason is because of emergencies, like the pandemic.
Multiplicity of development, sectoral and/or thematic plans that LGUs are asked to prepare
Currently there are 22 NGA-Mandated Plans and 11 Prescribed Sectoral and Thematic Plans aside from the Major Plans that are mandated by the Local Government Code.
But only few have been formulated because:
No sanctions anyway, LGUs have the choice whether to formulate or not
Plans were not considered necessary or beneficial, for example some LGUs consider the Gender and Development Plan as not needed or not necessary.
Repetitive
No focal person to steer the plan formulation process
RPS consists of systems and procedures that will harmonize existing guides to rationalize local planning with emphasis on:
1. integrating NGA sectoral concerns into the CDP and CLUP;
2. strengthening links of planning, budgeting, investment programming and expenditure management;
3. strengthening complementation of the province and its component LGUs on planning and budgeting
The local planning in the Philippines was characterized as chaotic due to the persistence of pre-devolution practices and also the failure to implement to their full implications the Local Government Code provisions on local planning. Thus, to rationalize the local planning system therefore starts with the complying of applicable provisions in the Local Government Code.
2nd, to reducing the number plans, certain sectoral or tropical plans that the NGAs required to LGUs must be integrated into the CLUP or CDP, and allow the local planning structure and processes to respond to these requirements.
3rd, as I mentioned earlier on horizontal and vertical linkages of LGUs to national government as well as other sectors, the NGAs planning guidelines must be aligned with the LGUs.
4th, the planning process should be simple so that even those who are not technically trained can participate in determining public policies and actions that affect their lives. This can be further discussed in the planning structure.
Medium Term Philippine Development Plan
Medium Term Philippine Investment Program
Executive Legislative Agenda
What are the policies and guidelines issued by the national government agencies, which have oversight role on local governance, towards rationalizing local planning ?
What are the policies and guidelines issued by the national government agencies, which have oversight role on local governance, towards rationalizing local planning ?
What are the policies and guidelines issued by the national government agencies, which have oversight role on local governance, towards rationalizing local planning ?
What are the policies and guidelines issued by the national government agencies, which have oversight role on local governance, towards rationalizing local planning ?
Governance must not be too preoccupied with how to produce the plan documents alone. Its should also be considered the other components about why LGUs ought to plan, who should be involved in planning, and how LGU plans are implemented.
The planning function of local governments is embedded in the dual status of local government units (LGU) as a political unit and as a corporate body.
There is a need for “rationalizing” the planning system to enhance the LGU’s capability in the performance of its DUAL functions:
As a political unit <read bullet>
As a corporate body <read bullets>
Performing planning functions involves addressing the following issues:
WHO should be involved in planning?
WHY should LGUs plan?
HOW are plans prepared?
WHAT are the LGU’s authority levels or tools for plan implementation?
The answers to these questions comprise the local planning system.
To be truly comprehensive, the CDP include all the 5 development and subsectors
Social
Economic
Infrastructure
Environment and Natural Resources
Institution
It also has been defined as an integrated series of decision documents, including maps specifying the nature of future physical, social, economic and environmental development of urban zone as outlined in the concept plan, consisting of, among others, a land use plan, including area phasing, sectoral programs, land acquisition and disposition programs and capital improvement program.
-The Language of Environmental Planning in the Philippines,
Source: LOCAL PLANNING ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE
PREPARING AND UPDATING THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (CDP)
DILG
Module I - mainly the responsibility of the technical component up to the application of analytical tools and techniques. The interpretation, that is probing into explanations and implications of the information generated, is better done involving the political component and the general public. The database should be updated every 3 years and the analysis and interpretation is done initially during the CLUP preparation. Subsequent data-handling activities will be repeated
every 3 years in conjunction with the CDP-ELA preparation. (See chapter 3 and chapter 9 below.)
Module II – should be done with the political component and the general public. The technical component only facilitates the proceedings. Long-term goals are formulated for inclusion in the CLUP. Medium-term and short-term objectives are formulated every 3 years in conjunction with the CDP-ELA process. The long-term vision statement should not be changed but should be carried through in every 3-year CDP-ELA prepared subsequently. What should change are the sectoral objectives and targets consistent with time limits and resource constraints as well as the results of monitoring and evaluation. (Refer to chapter 4 below.)
Module III – should be initiated by and with the full and active participation of the Sanggunian. The technical component only facilitates the process. It is done once and when enacted into a zoning ordinance will remain in force until amended or repealed. Amendments or revisions may be done in intervals of 3, 6, or 9 years, synchronized with the term of elective officials. (Refer to chapters 5, 7 and 9.)
Module IV – is the responsibility of the local development council with inputs from the sectoral and functional committees. The CDP and ELA will be prepared after every local election. The AIP which is the annual component of the LDIP is prepared every year synchronized with the annual budget cycle. (See chapters 6, 8 and 9.)
The institutional structure of local planning and development is spelled out in Title Six, Sections 106-115 of the Local Government Code. The principal function of this planning structure is to initiate the formulation of the “comprehensive multisectoral development plan” for approval by the provincial, city, municipal, or barangay level legislative council.
The Local Development Council (LDC) is a special body created under the Local Government Code of 1991 to assist the local legislative body in setting the direction of the economic and social development of the local government unit and to coordinate development efforts within its territorial jurisdiction.
The LDCs shall meet at least once every six (6) months or as often as may be necessary.
Representation of NGOs
Within a period of sixty (60) days from the organization of LDCs, NGOs shall choose from among themselves their representatives to said LDCs. The sanggunian concerned shall accredit NGOs.
The provincial, city, and municipal development councils shall:
Formulate long-term, medium-term, and annual socioeconomic development plans and policies;
Formulate medium-term and annual public investment programs;
Evaluate and prioritize socioeconomic development programs and projects;
Formulate local investment incentives to promote the inflow and direction of private investment capital;
Coordinate, monitor, and evaluate the implementation of development programs and projects; and
Perform such other functions as may be provided by law or competent authority.
The barangay development council shall:
Mobilize people's participation in local development efforts;
Prepare barangay development plans based on local requirements;
Monitor and evaluate the implementation of national or local programs and projects; and
Perform such other functions as may be provided by law or competent authority.
The provincial, city, municipal, or barangay development council shall, by resolution and within three (3) months from the date of reorganization of the
LDC, create an executive committee to represent and act in behalf of the LDC when the latter is not in session.
The executive committee shall hold its meetings at least once a month. Special meetings may be called by the chairman or by a majority of its members.
The executive committee of the provincial development council shall be composed of the governor as chairman, the representative of the component city and municipal mayors to be chosen from among themselves, the chairman of the committee on appropriations of the sangguniang panlalawigan, the president of the provincial liga ng mga barangay, and a representative of NGOs that are represented in the LDC, as members.
The executive committee of the city or municipal development council shall be composed of the mayor as chairman, the chairman of the committee on appropriations of the Sangguniang Panlungsod or Sangguniang Bayan, the president of the city or municipal liga ng mga barangay, and a representative of NGOs that are represented in the
LDC, as members.
The executive committee of the barangay development council shall be composed of the punong barangay as chairman, a representative of the sangguniang barangay to be chosen from among its members, and a representative of NGOs that are represented in the LDC, as members.
The Executive Committee shall
a. Ensure that the decisions of the LDC are faithfully carried out and implemented;
b. Act on matters that need immediate attention and action of the LDC;
c. Formulate policies, plans, and programs based on the objectives and priorities set by the LDC; and
d. Take final action on matters that may be authorized by the LDC except the approval of local development plans and annual investment plans.
The LDCs may form sectoral or functional committees to assist them in the performance of their functions. Each member of the LDC shall, as far as
practicable, participate in at least one sectoral or functional committee. Also, it is highly desirable for each Sanggunian member to select at least one sectoral committee to join in and act as the champion or sponsor of that sector’s programs and projects in the legislative council.
To ensure policy coordination and uniformity in operational directions, the sectoral and functional committees shall directly establish linkages with
NGAs and such sectoral or functional committees organized by the government for development, investment and consultative purposes.
Functions:
Provide the LDC with data and information essential to the formulation of plans, programs, and activities;
Define sectoral or functional objectives, set targets, and identify programs, projects, and activities for the particular sector or function;
Collate and analyze information and statistics and conduct related studies;
Conduct public hearings on vital issues affecting the sector or function;
Coordinate planning, programming, and implementation of programs, projects, and activities within each sector;
Monitor and evaluate programs and projects; and
Perform such other functions as may be assigned by the LDC.
There shall be constituted for each LDC a secretariat responsible for providing technical and administrative support, documenting proceedings, preparing reports; and providing such other assistance as may be required by the LDC. The LDC may avail of the services of any NGO or educational or research institution for this purpose.
The secretariat of the provincial, city, and municipal development councils shall be headed by their respective local planning and development coordinators.
The secretariat of the barangay development council shall be headed by the barangay secretary who shall be assisted by the city or municipal planning and development coordinator concerned.
The functions of the LPDO may be grouped into the following subjects corresponding to the major subdivisions of the planning process:
(1) Information management. This combines functions b and d. It involves generation, processing, storage and retrieval of sectoral planning information. Through the conduct of continuing studies and researches by the sectoral committees the LPDO builds up new information for planning and programming. In addition, feedback information collected through monitoring and evaluation of the impacts of program and project implementation as well as the effects of development regulation
constitutes a major component of the planning database. Under this function falls the task of building up and maintaining the Local Development Indicators system.
(2) Comprehensive and multi-sectoral planning. This function puts together functions a, c and e. It involves preparation, update or revision of the comprehensive land use plan and the comprehensive development plan.
(3) Investment programming. This combines functions c and f. This involves culling out programs and projects from the different sectoral plans of the CDP, which are of local ownership and responsibility to be included in the three-year LDIP and the AIP. This function also involves generating appropriate measures for attracting private investments into the locality (including drafting proposed resolutions and ordinances when necessary) for the local sanggunian to enact.
(4) Public participation promotion. Listed as function g, this requires of the LPDO effective skills in organizing and coordinating public consultations, seminars, workshops and other modes of involving the different sectors of society in all stages of the planning process.
(5) Secretariat services to the LDC. This is function h and it involves keeping minutes and records, setting agenda and related
In the case of large and high-income cities that can afford to hire adequate number of personnel in their local planning offices, a suggested structure of
the Local Planning and Development Coordinator’s Office that combines functional and sectoral concerns is given
To be able to effectively respond to the challenges and demands of the CDP formulation process, the members of the team should possess:
knowledge of the following:
planning process; and
development and governance concepts and principles
skills in:
planning
problem analysis,
technical writing, and
communications, and networking
knowledge, understanding of and sensitivity to critical development themes which LGUs are mandated to incorporate in their local plans such as:
poverty,
environment,
gender, and
peace
talent and proficiency in consultation processes; and
willingness to work with others