The document discusses using density functional theory calculations to investigate nickel phosphorus trisulfide (NiPS3) monolayers as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries. The results show that lithium atoms can strongly adsorb on both nickel and sulfur sites in the NiPS3 structure, allowing for multiple lithium adsorption. This provides a theoretical capacity of 608 mAh/g, one of the highest among two-dimensional transition metal compounds. The low lithium diffusion barrier of 0.279 eV also enables fast charging and discharging. Overall, the study suggests that creating multiple active sites in electrode materials could significantly boost lithium storage capacity.
2. Motivated by the experimental results, here, we investigated the
possibility of multi-active centers for LIBs. Previously, the lithium can
be stably adsorbed on Ni, S or P atoms in NiO [33], MoS2 [34] and black
phosphorus [35]. It means that Li atoms may be simultaneously ad-
sorbed on the Ni and S atoms on the NiPS3 monolayer with suitable
electronic states. Through comprehensive first-principles calculations,
we demonstrated that Li atoms are strongly adsorbed on Ni and S
centers because of the partial covalence character of NieS bonds.
Consequently, the specific capacity of NiPS3 is almost the highest one
for all realized 2D TM compounds. Therefore, our results provide an
important way to boost the specific capacity, benefiting the develop-
ment of high-performance LIBs.
2. Computational methods
Our first-principles calculations were based on density functional
theory (DFT), as implemented in Vienna ab initio simulation package
(VASP) [36]. The electron exchange-correlation interaction was de-
scribed by the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) [37] in the
scheme of Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE). To appropriately account
for the strongly correlated electrons, the GGA + U method was used to
deal with the partially filled d orbitals of the Ni atoms. We simulated Li
adsorption and diffusion on NiPS3 monolayer with a 2 × 2 × 1 super-
cell that one Li atom was used, and the interactions between two Li
atoms can be ignored. At the same time, a vacuum space of 20 Å was set
between NiPS3 layers to keep away from mirror interactions. The
convergence criteria of was set to be 1 × 10−5
eV in energy and
0.01 eV/Å in force, respectively. In all calculations, the cut-off energy
was placed to be 500 eV for the plane-wave basis. The Brillouin zone
was performed using a Monkhorst–Pack grid of 3 × 3 × 1 in the com-
putations of structure relaxation and self-consistent field (SCF). We
investigated the diffusion barrier for Li in the NiPS3 monolayer using
the climbing image nudged elastic band (CI-NEB) method [38,39],
which was known as an effectively tool for finding the energy of tran-
sition state (TS) [40,41]. The purpose of the NEB method is to find
saddle points and minimum energy paths (MEPs) between a given in-
itial state (IS) and final state (FS).
3. Results and discussions
3.1. Structural and electronic properties of monolayer NiPS3
Firstly, we focused on the structural and electronic properties of
NiPS3 monolayer. Similar with that of phosphorene, NiPS3 is a puckered
structure instead of a planar structure, as shown in Fig. 1(a). In order to
determine the ground state of NiPS3, SCF calculations of the anti-
ferromagnetic (AFM) and ferromagnetic (FM) states were both carried
out. It indicated that the NiPS3 monolayer tends to be antiferromagnetic
(AFM) coupling, which is more stable than the ferromagnetic (FM) state
as that in MnPS3 monolayer. Energy band shows that the 2D NiPS3
monolayer is an indirect semiconductor with a band gap of 1.63 eV,
consistent with the previous report [25]. To get further information
about the energy band, we plotted the partial charge densities of the
conduction band minimum (CBM) and valence band maximum (VBM),
as shown in Fig. 1b. Interestingly, both the CBM and VBM are domi-
nated by the covalence components of NieS bonds. It is well known
that fully occupied orbitals will become inert for Li adsorption. Thus,
the partial covalence characters of NieS bonds implies that both Ni
atoms and S atoms may be the possible active centers for Li adsorption.
3.2. Li adsorption and diffusion on monolayer NiPS3
In order to avoid interaction between lithium atoms, we used a
2 × 2 × 1 NiPS3 supercell. According to the symmetry of the crystal
structure, there are two possible positions which the lithium atom can
be doped in the 2D NiPS3, namely, the top site directly above one Ni
atom (H1) or S atom (H2), as shown in Fig. 2(b). The preference sites
for Li adsorption is judged by the adsorption energy, which is defined as
= − −
E E E nE n
( )/
b NiPS Li NiPS Li
n
3 3 (1)
where Eb is the binding energy of Li on NiPS3 monolayer, ENiPS3 is the
energy of NiPS3 monolayer supercell without Li atom, ELi is the total
energy of a single Li atom in a bulk BCC structure, and ENiPS3Lin
is the
total energy of NiPS3 monolayer with adsorbed n Li atoms. For ad-
sorption on H1 site, Li atom is located above Ni atom, and the corre-
sponding adsorption energy is −1.06 eV. For H2 site, Li atom is ad-
sorbed on the top of S atoms, and the calculated adsorption energy is
−0.88 eV, slightly smaller than that on Ni atoms.
Now, we discuss the intrinsic mechanism response for the different
adsorptive behavior. Our previous calculations on the pristine NiPS3
monolayer have explored that both the CBM and the VBM are con-
tributed by the covalence character of NieS bonds. The partial density
of states (PDOS) of Li adsorption indicates that charge has been trans-
ferred from Li atom into NieS covalence bonds. As shown in both
Fig. 3a and b, Li atom denotes the electrons to the Ni and S atoms in all
two adsorptive configurations with quite similar structures. Therefore,
both Ni atoms and S atoms can be the active sites of Li adsorption for
LIBs. The strength of Li and NiPS3 monolayer bonding determines the
adsorptive stability. Consequently, when Li is adsorbed on Ni or S
atoms, the structures become more stable.
On the other hand, rate of charging and discharging in LIBs is re-
lated to the mobility of Li ions on the NiPS3 monolayer. In order to
study how fast the Li atom diffuses on monolayer NiPS3, we calculated
the diffusion energy barrier along possible diffusion paths, which was
defined by energy difference between the relative energies on the sites
along the diffusion pathway and that of the corresponding initial state.
We selected different diffusion pathways: E1 → E2, E1 → E4, as shown
in Fig. 4(a). The corresponding energy barriers of diffusion path as a
function of the distance are summarized in Fig. 4(b). The minimum
diffusion barrier of the Li atoms diffusion on the NiPS3 monolayer is
about 0.279 eV, which obviously benefits the real application as an
anode material.
3.3. Average open circuit voltage and Li storage capacity of monolayer
NiPS3
The open circuit voltage (OCV) data is a main index to characterize
the performance of lithium batteries. To obtain the OCV, we consider
the reaction
+ →
NiPS xLi Li NiPS
x
3 3 (2)
where x is the number of adatoms inserted in the unit cell of NiPS3. In
theory, the OCV can be computed from the energy difference if the
volume and entropy effects are not considered. In other words, the
binding energy can be interpreted as OCV used in the battery field:
≈ −
∆
= −
− +
E
x
E xE E
x
OCV
( )
f Li NiPS Li NiPS
x 3 3
(3)
where ELixNiPS3
is the total energy of the composite system with x metal
atoms adsorbed in the unit cell of NiPS3, ELi is the total energy of a
single Li atom in a bulk BCC structure, and ENiPS3
is the total energy of
an isolated NiPS3.
Based on this method, a variety of properties related to Li-Batteries
can be predicted by filtering a series of LixNiPS3 ratios (x values). In
order to evaluate the average OCV and theoretical Li storage capacity of
the NiPS3 monolayer, it is necessary to estimate the Li adsorption ca-
pacity with the possible maximum containment. We considered a series
of structures basing on the stoichiometric ratio of LixNiPS3 (1 ≤ x ≤ 5),
as shown in Fig. 5. Considering that Li atoms can form strong adsorp-
tion with Ni and S atoms, the double-side adsorption of Li to NiPS3 has
the highest ratio (xmax) about 5, as shown in Fig. 5(c), and the calcu-
lated open circuit voltage is 0.55 eV. A weak binding is observed for 11
Z. Ma, et al. Applied Surface Science 495 (2019) 143534
2
3. Li atoms adsorbing on NiPS3, which indicates that the structure of
LixNiPS3 becomes less stable due to the strong electrostatic repulsive
interactions between adjacent Li atoms. Higher concentrations of Li
atoms inserting into a single layer of NiPS3 will cause bond breaking,
which destroys the monolayer NiPS3 structure and the lithium atom
insertion/extraction process is irreversible. The theoretical specific ca-
pacity of NiPS3 LIBs depending on the above structures is about 608
(mA h)/g, which is almost the highest one among 2D transition metal
compounds [18,22,42–46] and obviously higher than that of the cur-
rent commercial electrode material TiO2 (< 200 (mA h)/g) [47]. We
summarize the estimated open circuit voltage and theoretical specific
capacity of some available 2D materials in Table 1.
4. Discussion and conclusion
Taking 2D NiPS3 monolayer as an example, we have demonstrated
the importance of multi-active centers for developing high-performance
LIBs. To be noted, similar with the structure of NiPS3 monolayer, there
are many other TMPS3 monolayers, which are the potential candidate
anode materials. Furthermore, since multi-active centers can sig-
nificantly improve the specific capacity, synthesizing 2D TM com-
pounds with more covalence character will benefit the specific capacity.
In conclusion, with first principles calculations, we systematically
studied the Li adsorption and diffusion on NiPS3 monolayer, and then
explored the potentials of NiPS3 monolayer as Li ion battery anodes. We
found that Li atoms can strongly adsorbed on Ni and S atoms because of
the covalence character of NieS bonds. Because of the multi-active
centers, the maximum of Li adsorption can reach the stoichiometric
Fig. 1. (a) Top and side view of 2D NiPS3 monolayer. (b) Calculated band structures and partial charge density of conduction band minimum (CBM) and valence
band maximum (VBM) for the 2D NiPS3 monolayer. The blue, pink and yellow balls denote nickel, phosphorus and sulfur atoms, respectively.
Fig. 2. (a) Top and side views of single lithium atom
adsorbed on NiPS3 monolayer. Taking Li adsorption
above Ni atom as an example. (b) The H1 and H2
indicate two representative sites for Li atom ad-
sorption. The top site directly above one Ni atom
(H1), and S atom (H2). The blue, pink, yellow and
red balls denote nickel, phosphorus, sulfur and li-
thium atoms, respectively.
Z. Ma, et al. Applied Surface Science 495 (2019) 143534
3
4. Fig. 3. Calculated total density of states (TDOS) and partial density of states (PDOS) plot of the Li-absorbed NiPS3 monolayer of (a) H1 site, and (b) H2 site, the black
dotted lines denote the locations of the Fermi level.
Fig. 4. (a) Considered diffusion pathways for Li atom on NiPS3 monolayer. (b) (c) Diffusion barriers of Li atom on NiPS3 monolayer from E1 to E2(E4). E1, E2, E3, E4
indicate the initial and final position of different diffusion pathways. The blue, pink and yellow balls denote nickel, phosphorus and sulfur atoms, respectively.
Fig. 5. Top and side view of the structure that (a) six Li atoms, (b) eight Li atoms and (c) ten Li atoms are bilaterally adsorbed above the Ni and S atoms of the NiPS3
monolayer double-side. The blue, purple, yellow and red balls denote nickel, phosphorus, sulfur and lithium atoms, respectively.
Z. Ma, et al. Applied Surface Science 495 (2019) 143534
4
5. ratio of Li5NiPS3, and the specific capacity of NiPS3 monolayer is esti-
mated as 608 (mA h)/g, almost the highest one among 2D TM com-
pounds. The calculated Li diffusion barrier can be as low as 0.279 eV,
implying the possibility of fast rate-performance. Furthermore, the
calculated average intercalation potential is only 0.55 eV, which is
quite suitable for anode materials. Considering the various compounds
of TMPS3, our results not only explored a new mechanism in developing
high-performance LIBs, but also offered many potential candidate
anode materials.
Author contributions
The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All
authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgment
The work was supported by the NSFC (11474165), the Outstanding
Youth Fund of Nanjing Forestry University (NLJQ2015-03), and the
Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu
Province. We also acknowledge the support from the Shanghai
Supercomputer Centre.
Declaration of competing interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
References
[1] Y. Li, Y. Lu, C. Zhao, Y.S. Hu, M.M. Titirici, H. Li, X. Huang, L. Chen, Recent ad-
vances of electrode materials for low-cost sodium-ion batteries towards practical
application for grid energy storage, Energy Storage Mater 7 (2017) 130–151.
[2] J. Liu, P. Kopold, P. van Aken, J. Maier, Y. Yu, Energy storage materials from nature
through nanotechnology: a sustainable route from reed plants to a silicon anode for
lithium-ion batteries, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 9632–9636.
[3] S. Chu, Y. Cui, N. Liu, The path towards sustainable energy, Nat. Mater. 16 (2017)
16–22.
[4] J. Liu, K. Song, C. Zhu, C. Chen, P. van Aken, J. Maier, Y. Yu, Ge/C nanowires as
high-capacity and long-life anode materials for Li-ion batteries, ACS Nano 8 (2014)
7051–7059.
[5] K. Mizushima, P.C. Jones, P.J. Wiseman, J.B. Goodenough, LixCoO2 (0 < x < −1):
a new cathode material for batteries of high energy density, Mater. Res. Bull. 15
(1980) 783–789.
[6] K. Ozawa, Lithium-ion rechargeable batteries with LiCoO2 and carbon electrodes:
the LiCoO2/C system, Solid State Ionics 69 (1994) 212–221.
[7] F. Wang, Q. Yao, L. Zhou, Z. Ma, M. He, F. Wu, Theoretical understanding of SnS
monolayer as Li ion battery anode material, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 121 (2018)
261–265.
[8] S. Goriparti, E. Miele, F.D. Angelis, E.D. Fabrizio, R.P. Zaccaria, C. Capiglia, Review
on recent progress of nanostructured anode materials for Li-ion batteries, J. Power
Sources 257 (2014) 421–443.
[9] H. Li, Z. Wang, L. Chen, X. Huang, Research on advanced materials for Li-ion
batteries, Adv. Mater. 21 (2009) 4593–4607.
[10] M.S. Balogun, H. Yang, Y. Luo, W. Qiu, Y. Huang, Z.Q. Liu, Y. Tong, Achieving high
gravimetric energy density for flexible lithium-ion batteries facilitated by cor-
e–double-shell electrodes, Energy Environ. Sci. 11 (2018) 1859–1869.
[11] J. Liu, X.W. Liu, Two-dimensional nanoarchitectures for lithium storage, Adv.
Mater. 24 (2012) 4097–4111.
[12] K. Bolotin, K.J. Sikes, Z. Jiang, M. Klima, G. Fudenberg, J. Hone, P. Kim,
H.L. Stormer, Ultrahigh electron mobility in suspended graphene, Solid State
Commun. 146 (2008) 351–355.
[13] M.D. Stoller, S. Park, Y. Zhu, J. An, R.S. Ruoff, Graphene-based ultracapacitors,
Nano Lett. 8 (2008) 3498–3502.
[14] M. Zhou, Y. Zhai, S. Dong, Electrochemical sensing and biosensing platform based
on chemically reduced graphene oxide, Anal. Chem. 81 (2009) 5603–5613.
[15] Q. Yao, C. Huang, Y. Yuan, Y. Liu, S. Liu, K. Deng, E. Kan, Theoretical prediction of
phosphorene and nanoribbons as fast-charging Li ion battery anode materials, J.
Phys. Chem. C 119 (2015) 6923–6928.
[16] J. Zhuang, X. Xu, G. Peleckis, W. Hao, S. Dou, Y. Du, Silicene: a promising anode for
lithium-ion batteries, Adv. Mater. 29 (2017) 1606718.
[17] J. Hu, C. Ouyang, S. Yang, H. Yang, Germagraphene as a promising anode material
for lithium-ion batteries predicted from first-principles calculations, Nanoscale
Horiz 4 (2019) 457–463.
[18] Q. Tang, Z. Zhou, P. Shen, Are MXenes promising anode materials for Li ion bat-
teries? Computational studies on electronic properties and Li storage capability of
Ti3C2 and Ti3C2X2 (X = F, OH) monolayer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012)
16909–16916.
[19] W. Li, Y. Yang, G. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Ultrafast and directional diffusion of lithium in
phosphorene for high-performance lithium-ion battery, Nano Lett. 15 (2015)
1691–1697.
[20] R. Zhang, X. Wu, J. Yang, Blockage of ultrafast and directional diffusion of Li atoms
on phosphorene with intrinsic defects, Nanoscale 8 (2016) 4001–4006.
[21] H. Zou, X. Liang, Z. Wang, S. Cheng, H. Xiang, Preparation of Li4Ti5O12 micro-
spheres with a pure Cr2O3 coating layer and its effect for lithium storage, Chin. J.
Chem. Phys. 30 (2017) 103–111.
[22] D. Er, J. Li, M. Naguib, Y. Gogotsi, V.B. Shenoy, Ti3C2 MXene as a high capacity
electrode material for metal (Li, Na, K, Ca) ion batteries, ACS Appl. Mater.
Interfaces 6 (2014) 11173–11179.
[23] X. Li, X. Wu, J. Yang, Half-metallicity in MnPSe3 exfoliated nanosheet with carrier
doping, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 11065–11069.
[24] K.Z. Du, X.Z. Wang, Y. Liu, P. Hu, M.I.B. Utama, C.K. Gan, Q. Xiong, C. Kloc, Weak
Van der Waals stacking, wide-range band gap, and Raman study on ultrathin layers
of metal phosphorus trichalcogenides, ACS Nano 10 (2016) 1738–1743.
[25] X. Zhang, X. Zhao, D. Wu, Y. Jing, Z. Zhou, MnPSe3 monolayer: a promising 2D
visible-light photohydrolytic catalyst with high carrier mobility, Adv. Sci. 3 (2016)
1600062.
[26] A. Chaturvedi, A. Slabon, P. Hu, S.L. Feng, K.K. Zhang, R.R. Prabhakar, C. Kloc,
Rapid synthesis of transition metal dichalcogenide few-layer thin crystals by the
microwave-induced-plasma assisted method, J. Cryst. Growth 450 (2016) 140–147.
[27] B.L. Chittari, Y. Park, D. Lee, M. Han, A.H. MacDonald, E. Hwang, J. Jung,
Electronic and magnetic properties of single-layer M P X 3 metal phosphorous tri-
chalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 94 (2016) 184428.
[28] Z. Hu, Q.N. Liu, W.Y. Sun, W.J. Li, Z.L. Tao, S.L. Chou, J. Chen, S.X. Dou, MoS2 with
an intercalation reaction as a long-life anode material for lithium ion batteries,
Inorg. Chem. Front. 3 (2016) 532–535.
[29] Y. Liu, X.H. Liu, B.M. Nguyen, J. Yoo, J.P. Sullivan, S.T. Picraux, J.Y. Huang,
S.A. Dayeh, Tailoring lithiation behavior by interface and bandgap engineering at
the nanoscale, Nano Lett. 13 (2013) 4876–4883.
[30] Y. Jiao, Y. Zheng, M. Jaroniec, S.Z. Qiao, Design of electrocatalysts for oxygen- and
hydrogen-involving energy conversion reactions, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015)
2060–2086.
[31] R. Dangol, Z. Dai, A. Chaturvedi, Y. Zheng, Y. Zhang, K.N. Dinh, B. Li, Y. Zong,
Q. Yan, Few-layer NiPS3 nanosheets as bifunctional materials for Li-ion storage and
oxygen evolution reaction, Nanoscale 10 (2018) 4890–4896.
[32] Y.V. Kuzminskii, B.M. Voronin, N.N. Redin, Iron and nickel phosphorus trisulfides
as electroactive materials for primary lithium batteries, J. Power Sources 55 (1995)
133–141.
[33] H. Liu, G. Wang, J. Liu, S. Qiao, H. Ahn, Highly ordered mesoporous NiO anode
material for lithium ion batteries with an excellent electrochemical performance, J.
Mater. Chem. 21 (2015) 3046–3052.
[34] J. Xiao, D. Choi, L. Cosimbescu, P. Koech, J. Liu, J.P. Lemmon, Exfoliated MoS2
nanocomposite as an anode material for lithium ion batteries, Chem. Mater. 22
(2010) 4522–4524.
[35] L. Li, Y. Yu, G.J. Ye, Q. Ge, X. Ou, H. Wu, D. Feng, X.H. Chen, Y. Zhang, Black
phosphorus field-effect transistors, Nat. Nanotechnol. 9 (2014) 372–377.
[36] G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy cal-
culations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 11169–11186.
[37] J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, ERRATA: generalized gradient approximation
made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865–3868.
[38] G. Henkelman, H. Jonsson, Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band
method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points, J. Chem. Phys. 113
(2000) 9978–9985.
[39] G. Henkelman, B.P. Uberuaga, H. Jonsson, A climbing image nudged elastic band
method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths, J. Chem. Phys. 113
(2000) 9901–9904.
[40] G. Mills, H. Jonsson, Quantum and thermal effects in H 2 dissociative adsorption:
evaluation of free energy barriers in multidimensional quantum systems, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 72 (1994) 1124–1127.
[41] G. Mills, H. Jonsson, G.K. Schenter, Reversible work transition state theory: ap-
plication to dissociative adsorption of hydrogen, Surf. Sci. 324 (1995) 305–337.
[42] Q. Sun, Y. Dai, Y. Ma, T. Jing, W. Wei, B. Huang, Ab initio prediction and char-
acterization of Mo2C monolayer as anodes for lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries,
J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7 (2016) 937–943.
[43] Y. Jing, Z. Zhou, C.R. Cabrera, Z. Chen, Metallic VS2 monolayer: a promising 2D
anode material for Lithium ion batteries, J. Phys. Chem. C 117 (2013)
25409–25413.
[44] Z. Guo, J. Zhou, Z. Sun, New two-dimensional transition metal borides for Li ion
Table 1
The estimated open circuit voltage (V) and the theoretical specific capacity
(mA h/g) of some investigated promising anode materials for LIBs.
Species Open circuit voltage Theoretical specific capacity Ref.
NiPS3 0.55 608 This work
Ti3C2 0.62 320 18
Mo2C 0.14 526 42
VS2 0.93 466 43
Zr2B2 0.63 526 45
orth-Mo2B2 0.41 444 44
Z. Ma, et al. Applied Surface Science 495 (2019) 143534
5
6. batteries and electrocatalysis, J. Mater. Chem. A 5 (2017) 23530–23535.
[45] G. Yuan, T. Bo, X. Qi, P.F. Liu, Z. Huang, B.T. Wang, Monolayer Zr2B2: a promising
two-dimensional anode material for Li-ion batteries, Appl. Surf. Sci. 480 (2019)
448–453.
[46] T. Bo, P.F. Liu, J. Zhang, F. Wang, B.T. Wang, Tetragonal and trigonal Mo2B2
monolayers: two new low-dimensional materials for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 (2019) 5178–5188.
[47] H. Ming, Y. Yan, J. Ming, X. Li, Q. Zhou, H. Huang, J. Zheng, Porous TiO2 nanor-
ibbons and TiO2 nanoribbon/carbon dot composites for enhanced Li-ion storage,
RSC Adv. (25) (2014) 12971–12976.
Z. Ma, et al. Applied Surface Science 495 (2019) 143534
6