Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Uranus, Venus and the sun are on one straight line (180 degrees), found vertically on the solar planets revolutions direction.
The hypothesis Explanation
- This hypothesis is an imaginary idea - the paper doesn't try to prove it – but the paper tries to show a deep dependency found between Venus and Uranus motions Data and this dependency harmony with the sun data –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1- The Unit Definition Is Relative
that means
Value as – one kilometer - one hour - one degree or one liter…etc- all such values and units are defined based on the observer position and situation
That means
What we see as a time value can work in another place as a distance value
And
What we see as a degree value can work in another place as a distance value
2- The Energy Different Types Depend On This Same Concept.
Why Energy has different types? The energy gives energy whatever its form (oil- wood- electricity – magnetism – nuclear….etc)
The result of all these forms are similar approximately – so why there are different types for the energy?
Because of the observer position and situation
This paper tries to discuss and prove this fact
Earth axial tilt 23.4 degrees effects on many other solar planets in addition to the Earth,
Which proves that,
The solar group is one body (or one machine), each planet should be considered as a member in this same body where all solar planets are created from the same energy.
The solar system geometry (part ii) (revised)Georgy Tawdrous
Abstract
The Solar Planets Group is One Machine
This one machine cooperates together to enable the Earth to produce The Solar Day Time
Providing the life chance on the Earth..
This paper aims to prove this idea and explains this machine mechanism.
Uranus Is Perpendicular On The Inner Planets (Argument No. 17)
Uranus Effect On The Solar System Geometry Is A Vertical Effect
That's why Uranus deals & effects basically on The Planets Axial Tilts –
But
Why is Uranus effect so important one on the solar system geometry? Let's answer
(1)
Uranus Effect geometrically is A Vertical Effect – it's a vertical force – effects on The Planets Axial Tilts
(2)
This Vertical Force Aims To Prevent Any Overturn Vertically To Be Done By Any Planet Around The Sun
i.e.
Uranus effect unifies the planets motions around the sun – and because of Uranus vertical effect the planets revolve around the sun in the same direction and no vertical overturning can be occurred by any planet, saving the solar system general motion.
The paper tries to prove this fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect Causes To Create A New Rate Of Time In The Solar System Motion
Let's remember the different rates of time argument in following:
- I have discovered many of light motion features in Planet Motion
- Because of that, I have tried to explain how such features are created, then I had to suggest the 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- For detailed investigation I had to suggest the 2nd hypothesis (Light Motion For 1 Second Causes Planet Motion For 1 Day)
- The research 2nd hypothesis suggests that, there are different rate of time in the solar system, then I have concluded the basic rule to create these different rates of time which is (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
Then
- I have found that, the original rate of time which is (1 Second Of Light Motion Is Equivalent For 1 Solar Day (86400 seconds) Of Planet Motion) this rate of time is valid always in the solar system motion ….
But
- In the Earth moon orbit, this rate is changed into one more rate of time which is (1 Day Of The Sun Is Equivalent Of A Year (365.25 Days) Of Earth)
i.e.
- The 1st rate of time is found generally in the solar system but the 2nd rate of time is found in the Earth moon orbit – the nest question should be why??
- This is happened because of Venus & Mars Motions Interactive Effect On The Earth Moon Orbit And Motion.. so this paper tries to discover the geometrical mechanism by which this effect is created…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Jupiter diameter =142984 km? (observation vs data analysis II)Gerges francis
This paper discusses the following hypothesis:
1- There's A Relationship Between Jupiter & Saturn Diameters.
2- Jupiter & Saturn Diameters Relationship effects On The Solar Planets Diameters Creation.
3- Jupiter & Saturn Diameters Relationship effects On Earth Moon Orbit Creation.
4- Jupiter & Saturn Diameters Relationship is effected by Mercury Motion
5- Jupiter & Saturn Diameters Relationship shows and proves the Solar Group Main Energy Direction.
Paper Main Conclusion
There's One Equation Only Controls All Solar Planets Data
Paper Hypothesis
Uranus Day Period =17.2 Hours
This Value Depends On Pluto Orbital Inclination 17.2 Degrees
i.e.
Pluto Energy is transported to Uranus – This Process proves Energy Transportation through the solar group-
Based on that
Pluto Data (Energy) is seen in Uranus Data (Energy) but with different unit – where units change is one of Energy Transportation Geometrical Features
Why Energy Transportation needs to change the units? To provide the required flexibility for Energy Transportation process
Shortly…
Uranus Day Period (17.2 hours) is resulted directly from Pluto Orbital Inclination (17.2 degrees)
This hypothesis should be a direct application on my theory of Energy Transportation Through the Solar Group – and If we can prove this hypothesis – that will support the theory proves strongly
,Can uranus motion effect on the earth motion,Gerges francis
Paper Question
Can Uranus Motion effect on the Earth Motion?
The Question Explanation
- Metonic Cycle is The Moon Cycle continues for 19 years (6939.75 days)
- Uranus orbital Circumference equal 19 Earth orbital circumferences. That tells, while Uranus revolves around the sun one revolution the Earth with its moon revolve around the sun 19 revolutions (19 years), But this rate (19) is calculated based on the distances and not on the periods of time
- These 2 data tells that, If Uranus motion effect on the Earth and its moon motions, the rate (19) should be seen in this effect data.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1- The Unit Definition Is Relative
that means
Value as – one kilometer - one hour - one degree or one liter…etc- all such values and units are defined based on the observer position and situation
That means
What we see as a time value can work in another place as a distance value
And
What we see as a degree value can work in another place as a distance value
2- The Energy Different Types Depend On This Same Concept.
Why Energy has different types? The energy gives energy whatever its form (oil- wood- electricity – magnetism – nuclear….etc)
The result of all these forms are similar approximately – so why there are different types for the energy?
Because of the observer position and situation
This paper tries to discuss and prove this fact
Earth axial tilt 23.4 degrees effects on many other solar planets in addition to the Earth,
Which proves that,
The solar group is one body (or one machine), each planet should be considered as a member in this same body where all solar planets are created from the same energy.
The solar system geometry (part ii) (revised)Georgy Tawdrous
Abstract
The Solar Planets Group is One Machine
This one machine cooperates together to enable the Earth to produce The Solar Day Time
Providing the life chance on the Earth..
This paper aims to prove this idea and explains this machine mechanism.
Uranus Is Perpendicular On The Inner Planets (Argument No. 17)
Uranus Effect On The Solar System Geometry Is A Vertical Effect
That's why Uranus deals & effects basically on The Planets Axial Tilts –
But
Why is Uranus effect so important one on the solar system geometry? Let's answer
(1)
Uranus Effect geometrically is A Vertical Effect – it's a vertical force – effects on The Planets Axial Tilts
(2)
This Vertical Force Aims To Prevent Any Overturn Vertically To Be Done By Any Planet Around The Sun
i.e.
Uranus effect unifies the planets motions around the sun – and because of Uranus vertical effect the planets revolve around the sun in the same direction and no vertical overturning can be occurred by any planet, saving the solar system general motion.
The paper tries to prove this fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect Causes To Create A New Rate Of Time In The Solar System Motion
Let's remember the different rates of time argument in following:
- I have discovered many of light motion features in Planet Motion
- Because of that, I have tried to explain how such features are created, then I had to suggest the 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- For detailed investigation I had to suggest the 2nd hypothesis (Light Motion For 1 Second Causes Planet Motion For 1 Day)
- The research 2nd hypothesis suggests that, there are different rate of time in the solar system, then I have concluded the basic rule to create these different rates of time which is (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
Then
- I have found that, the original rate of time which is (1 Second Of Light Motion Is Equivalent For 1 Solar Day (86400 seconds) Of Planet Motion) this rate of time is valid always in the solar system motion ….
But
- In the Earth moon orbit, this rate is changed into one more rate of time which is (1 Day Of The Sun Is Equivalent Of A Year (365.25 Days) Of Earth)
i.e.
- The 1st rate of time is found generally in the solar system but the 2nd rate of time is found in the Earth moon orbit – the nest question should be why??
- This is happened because of Venus & Mars Motions Interactive Effect On The Earth Moon Orbit And Motion.. so this paper tries to discover the geometrical mechanism by which this effect is created…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Jupiter diameter =142984 km? (observation vs data analysis II)Gerges francis
This paper discusses the following hypothesis:
1- There's A Relationship Between Jupiter & Saturn Diameters.
2- Jupiter & Saturn Diameters Relationship effects On The Solar Planets Diameters Creation.
3- Jupiter & Saturn Diameters Relationship effects On Earth Moon Orbit Creation.
4- Jupiter & Saturn Diameters Relationship is effected by Mercury Motion
5- Jupiter & Saturn Diameters Relationship shows and proves the Solar Group Main Energy Direction.
Paper Main Conclusion
There's One Equation Only Controls All Solar Planets Data
Paper Hypothesis
Uranus Day Period =17.2 Hours
This Value Depends On Pluto Orbital Inclination 17.2 Degrees
i.e.
Pluto Energy is transported to Uranus – This Process proves Energy Transportation through the solar group-
Based on that
Pluto Data (Energy) is seen in Uranus Data (Energy) but with different unit – where units change is one of Energy Transportation Geometrical Features
Why Energy Transportation needs to change the units? To provide the required flexibility for Energy Transportation process
Shortly…
Uranus Day Period (17.2 hours) is resulted directly from Pluto Orbital Inclination (17.2 degrees)
This hypothesis should be a direct application on my theory of Energy Transportation Through the Solar Group – and If we can prove this hypothesis – that will support the theory proves strongly
,Can uranus motion effect on the earth motion,Gerges francis
Paper Question
Can Uranus Motion effect on the Earth Motion?
The Question Explanation
- Metonic Cycle is The Moon Cycle continues for 19 years (6939.75 days)
- Uranus orbital Circumference equal 19 Earth orbital circumferences. That tells, while Uranus revolves around the sun one revolution the Earth with its moon revolve around the sun 19 revolutions (19 years), But this rate (19) is calculated based on the distances and not on the periods of time
- These 2 data tells that, If Uranus motion effect on the Earth and its moon motions, the rate (19) should be seen in this effect data.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
Why does Saturn move during its day period (10.7 h) a distance = (373644 km) = 98.67% of Saturn Circumference (378675 km)?
The Question Explanation
- Better we need to ask (Why should Saturn move in its day period a distance = its circumference?), what geometrical effect can be produced by that?
- If a planet moves during its day period a distance = its Circumference, that creates a proportionality between this planet circumference, its orbital circumference, its day period and its orbital period, showing this planet motion data is defined based on each other.
- So, if a planet moves during its day period a distance = its circumference, that may create one question controls these 4 planet motion data.
- Saturn gives us this chance, but not accurately, because Saturn moves during its day period a distance = 98.67% of its Circumference (there's a difference between the 2 distances =1.33%)
- Where the difference is so small, the same result can be produced but with some complexities.
- The paper analyzes Saturn motion data to see if such equation can be defined and what difficulties are still found in its way.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (VI) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon motion has 2 orbits
The hypothesis explanation
- The Earth moon is so specific planet in the solar system and so effective in its general geometry
- Uranus and Neptune effect on the moon orbit creation and cause its regression by 19 degrees yearly
- Uranus and Neptune orbital inclinations are created by the effect on their interactions in the moon orbit
- Mars orbital inclination is created based on the moon orbit interactions
- The moon orbital motion has 2 orbits both perpendicular on one another
- Venus axial tilt and orbital inclination are created as a result of Uranus perpendicularity on the moon orbits.
Paper conclusion
- Many of Planets data can be created by their values only if there are 2 orbits for the moon motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Life Is Found On Earth Only (Claim)
-The Solar Planet Orbital Period is found based on geometrical reason.
-The Sun circles Earth during 365.25 days giving one Face always to the Earth which is The Life Reason On Earth
-The Life chance on Earth is found by a mentioned process based on the solar group geometrical structure and not found by any random process….
Mars Orbital Distance Is Changed Through History (Part II) Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis…
Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm and Mars has immigrated from it to dwell in the new point with Orbital Distance = 227.9 mkm
i.e.
Mars Was The Next Direct Planet After Mercury – where Mercury orbital distance =57.9 mkm and Mars orbital distance was 84 mkm
How to prove that?
Mars Daily Motion Data shows a great effect of Mercury on Mars Motion – which can't be explained unless by A Direct Effect Of The Neighbor Planet
How such effect can be found with a great distance?!
Mercury effected on Mars Creation and Motion Data when Mars was its neighbor with orbital distance =84 mkm – So When Mars has immigrated – the planet geometrical structure reserved this effect in its data – accordingly – Mars Motion Data shows clearly Mercury Effect on Mars Motion - which proves that Mars was the direct next neighbor of Mercury
Paper Question
Why Mars motion daily degrees (0.524 deg) = (1/ Mars orbital inclination 1.9 deg.)?
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current descriptionGerges francis
The basic challenge in the solar group study is the current description which contradicts with the solar planets data ….
Simply the solar group current description is unreal…! The planet doesn’t move by gravity, and no big bang is found in the universe origin..! Solar Planet motion can't be independent from other planets motions, on the contrary the planets motions work as gears motions, each planet causes the other planet to move!
In fact it's hard to examine this situation… the solar group current description is created based on the direct observation, regardless any planet data… which creates approximately a pure imaginary description…
This imaginary description is created also because of the basic definitions absence…(No definitions for …. distance, time, Energy, Force, Matter, Gravity, Light Nature, Field etc..). to see much we need to examine the eclipse phenomena
Example For Explanation – Total Solar Eclipse
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? i.e. Why we see the sun disc= the moon disc?
The answer is known.. because
(Sun Diameter / Moon Diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance / Earth Moon Distance)
Why? …..Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? Or
Planet orbital distance is defined by gravity …?! Let's try to answer
1st Critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
And/
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see it
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
But/
Uranus Diameter is Greater Than Neptune Diameter,
Where Neptune Mass is Greater Than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept!
Abstract
Paper question
How the matter is created?
The Question Explanation
(1)
- Uranus Day Period = 61920 seconds and
- (61920 seconds /12104 seconds) = 5.1 = (Venus velocity / Uranus velocity)
- Where 12104 km = Venus Diameter
(2)
- Saturn orbital period = 257928 hours = 10.7 hours x 12104 x 2
- Where 10.7 hours = Saturn Day Period
(3)
- 10.7 hours x 3600 seconds x π = 120536 seconds
- Where
- 120536 km = Saturn diameter and
- (12104 x π)2 = 120536 km x 12104 = Saturn Orbital Distance (error 1%)
- The paper argument tells that, the planet diameter is created based on geometrical calculations taken into consideration the other planets data
- Specifically, Venus diameter =12104 km because it's created based on geometrical calculations concerns Uranus Motion Data.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)Gerges francis
Abstract
The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover The Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory (Which Is A Square) And To Show The Imaginary One (An Ellipse)
i.e.
The Solar Planet Real Trajectory Is A Square But The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover This Real Trajectory And Shows The Imaginary One Which Is The An Ellipse…
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect (II)Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Venus & Mars Motions Causes To Create The Moon Orbit Regression
- In the paper No. (part I) of this series, I have claimed that, Mars & Venus Motion interactive effect causes the Earth Moon orbit to regress creating a new rate of time….
i.e.
- (Light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 day), this rate is found in the solar system out of the Earth moon orbit
- In the moon orbit the rate is (1 day of the sun = 1 year of Earth), this difference in rates is found by Venus & Mars motion effect on the moon orbit
But
- With what mechanism Venus and Mars do this effect? The data in the previous paper supports this claim strongly but no geometrical mechanism was explained in it – we have to do that in this paper
- As we know, the 1st rate of time is (1 to 86400) and the 2nd one is (1 to 365.25). so what Venus and Mars do, is to create the rate 237 which will cause the value 86400 to be equal 365.25, (237 = Venus rotation period/ Mars rotation period)
- The question which this paper tries to answer is (How Venus and Mars daily motion can produce this rate 237?, shortly by what mechanism this rate is produced?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter Gravity Effects On The Earth Moon Motion Gerges francis
Paper Claim
- Jupiter Mass Gravity Effects On The Earth Moon Motion
- Jupiter Mass Gravity Force Effect On The Earth Moon = 42% Of The Sun Mass Gravity Force Effect On Pluto
- Because the sun gravity keeps Pluto in its orbit, that tells Jupiter force must have an effect on the Earth moon motion
- Based on that, Jupiter gravity is the second force effect on the Earth moon motion
- Such effect can't be performed, neither by Mars because of its very small mass nor by Saturn because of its far distance
- That tells Jupiter Mass Gravity must have a greater effect on Mars motion than its effect on the Earth moon motion, and That's True and because of that (Mars Eccentricity = 0.094) but (The Moon Eccentricity = 0.055), proving that Jupiter gravity effect on Mars so greater than its effect on the Earth moon motion.
Shortly,
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Saturn Effect On The Solar Group Geometry
Saturn shows Clearly The Solar Group Geometrical Structure.
The Basic Hypothesis:
The Solar Group Is One Trajectory Of Energy And Each Planet Is A Point On This Same Trajectory…
i.e.
The Solar Planets (matter is energy because E=mc2) and their orbital distances (Space is Energy – hypothesis)both are created from the same energy which makes
The solar group as one body and each planet is a member of this same body.
Or
The solar group can be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the solar group is created depending on the cooperation and integration between the solar planets.
Saturn Effect
Saturn tells how the solar group is created based on the previous vision
i.e.
Saturn tells us which planet is created first and which second and what geometrical rule control this creation process.
Shortly
The solar group is one family, all planets are relatives to each other – but Saturn tells us who's brother to whom and who's uncle, who's parent and who's nephew
Saturn Data tells this fact clearly as the sun …Saturn Is The Solar Group Secret
We Complete Our Discussion In The Previous Paper
The Moon Creation And Motion
We use the previous paper as the Data source and in next papers we will try to understand this data as deep as possible
In this paper we have 3 basic questions to deal with – let's ask them in following:
1st Question
Does Matter Creation Process Uses The Time Period As An Essential Reference?
i.e. Is the Matter created with its defined period or can be in life forever?!
2nd Question
Why Mars So Specific Planet In The Solar System?
3rd Question
If (really) There's An Interaction between Mars & Earth Moon Motions, what geometrical mechanism behind to support this interaction?
Paper Objective
The Earth Moon is created by Mars Collision with Venus and Earth through Mars Motion in its Migration from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its new orbital distance (27.9 mkm) – This is my suggested theory "Mars Migration Theory"
Where the theory is supported strongly by "the Giant-Impact hypothesis" and many other geological proves
We try to know how the moon data is created based on this theory – we realize that Earth attracted the collisions debris and collected them together to create its Moon but why the moon diameter =3475 km? (for example) – the current description refers to that the answer should depend on The Earth Mass – but many planets data contradicts this direction of answer – that's why we provide our investigation to see as deep as possible trying to know what's happened after the collisions and enabled the Earth Moon to have its data
Note Please
Before any discussion we have to review Mars Migration Theory – because it's our basic point based on which we analyze the data – So we review it in (Point no. 4- Time Effect On Matter Creation Process) before the matter creation discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
,Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit, Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Earth Moon Orbit Is Created By A Geometrical Force More Complex Than The Masses Gravity Forces
Clearly – There's A Gab Between The Moon Orbit Creation Theory And Its Data – The Masses Gravity can't create the Moon Orbit
Because
The moon orbit is created based on many geometrical rules we don't see in the masses gravity forces
For Example
The moon motion (4) basic points which are:
Perigee Radius =363000 km (The most near point the moon can reach to the Earth)
Apogee Radius = 406000 km (The most far point the moon can reach from the Earth)
Total solar eclipse radius = 378000 km (Earth moon distance at total solar eclipse)
The moon orbital (registered) distance =384000 km
These 4 points can be produced by Pythagoras rule depending on each other by using the value (86000 km) as a dimension in the right-angle triangle
Similar to that – the moon orbit data is controlled by different geometrical rules has no roots in the masses gravity forces
Paper Question
Does the moon move by masses gravity forces? ……
Yes …
- The Light Motion Is The Distance Creator And Energy Provider
- The Planet Follows The Light Motion through the same distance and receives the energy
- The Planet Matter Is Created As A Function Of The Planet Motion
- After The Planet Matter Creation – The Created Matter resists To Save The Motion Based On Which The Matter Is Created – The Planets Matter Resistance Is Seen As Masses Gravity Forces
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Neptune data shows the solar group geometryGerges francis
Research Paper
"Neptune Data shows The Solar Group Geometry"
Abstract
Neptune Data supports the following conclusions:
1- The solar group is created from one energy only
2- The solar group is built by one geometrical structure and each planet is a part in this geometrical structure (or the solar group is a body and each planet is a member in it)
3- This geometrical structure causes to produce all solar planets data to be suitable for its job in this geometrical structure (which guarantees the planets motions harmony)
4- The solar planet motion real trajectory is square but we see it as an ellipse because of the moon orbit geometrical effect.
5- The Metonic Cycle (6939.75 days) is a motion in a vertical level relative to the solar inner planets horizontal level.
6- The moon orbit regression yearly 19 degrees is done because of Neptune and Uranus effect on the moon orbit geometrical structure.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves no.2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is Square And Not An Ellipse
This papers provides 2 proves for this claim
1- Earth Cycle (365+365+365+366) = 1461 days… the previous Cycle consists of 4 years and can be used as square form..! but the square is 4 equal distances and not periods of time…?! But We have discussed before that the time and distance values can be equivalent in some cases in the solar group geometrical structure… which means the value which we see as period of time may work as distance for another observer… (Why Earth has this 4 sidereal years Cycle?)
Please review
The Time definition
2- Mars Immigration proves that the solar planet motion trajectory is square and not an ellipse (This Paper discusses This Point Only)
Please review
Mars Immigration Proves (Revised)
Direction Of Energy Through The Solar Group Gerges francis
- The Solar Group Main Energy is sent from Jupiter to Pluto – This energy sending is continued for 2 sequence solar days
- Neptune used Jupiter Sent Energy consuming 16% of this total energy and the rest of Energy Neptune reflected it toward the inner planets into 2 Energy Trajectories.
o 1st Trajectory is sent to Earth (will be discussed Point No.4)
o 2nd Trajectory is sent to Mercury
- The 1st Trajectory of Energy is reached to Earth (with 86400mkm) – Where Earth reflected this energy into 2 new parts
o Part 1 the energy is sent from Earth to Venus
o Part 2 the energy is sent from Earth to (Jupiter & Uranus)
- The total energy (90000mkm) proves that all energy gathered together on one point only and no contradiction is found…
This explanation shows that the energy passes in cycle through the solar group
The previous idea supports my claim:
- The Solar Group is One Trajectory Of Energy and each planet is appoint on this same energy trajectory….. or
- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet is a part of this same geometrical structure (building)- i.e. Each planet data is created to be suitable for the required task of this planet in the whole building …..and
- No solar planet can be found or move independently
a. Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this same body. All solar planets and their orbital distances are created by the same energy (by the same blood all body members are created)
b. Or, The solar group be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the machine job depends on the gears different tasks.. and that means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the main base on which the solar group is created and move.
Paper hypothesis
-The Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets.
The hypothesis explanation
-The Earth moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km
-Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during (153.3 h) a distance = 2593836 km
-Why These Distances Are Equal?
-How the motion at distance be done? or by what geometrical mechanism the masses gravity causes a motion at distance? These questions still need answers
- The motion transportation among the planets can be answer for these questions.
- What does mean "A motion Transportation"?
- It means, a planet motion causes another planet to move, and this motion depends on the planet motion and not on its masses gravity only. That tells, the motion transportation process must be done based on new geometrical rules.
- If the paper hypothesis is true and the motion is transported among the solar planets, that will answer why these 2 distances are equal? Because the motion is transported from one planet to another and by that the 2 planets move equal distances in defined periods of time.
Paper objective
- The paper tries to prove that, the motion is transported from a planet to another planet through the solar system and this motion transportation caused Pluto motion distance during its day period to be = the moon displacements total
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Questions
How to describe the Moon Motion Trajectory?
Let's review our conclusions in following:
- The research 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- The research 2nd one (light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 day)
- The 2nd hypothesis tells that there are different rates of time in the solar system,
- The basic rule tells (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
The Moon Orbital Motion Trajectory:
- Earth moves per solar day a distance =2.58 million km with an angle =0.985 deg on the horizontal line, the moon moves a very similar motion to Earth motion
- If there's no (Lorentz Length Contraction phenomenon) in the solar system, the moon motion would be as a parallel line to Earth motion trajectory … but
- Because of the contraction rate (1.0725) the moon motion distance daily (2.58 mkm) is contracted to be 2.41 mkm
- The difference (2.58 mkm -2.41 mkm) is a distance required necessary to be added to the moon motion distance to save the moon and Earth motions accompanying.
- 0.17 mkm is required to be passed daily
- The moon moves daily a displacement =88000 km depending on Earth Gravity
- But, Earth Mass = The 4 Inner Planets Masses Total (error 1%)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (II)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
There's an interaction between Earth and Jupiter Motions
The hypothesis Explanation
- What does mean "an interaction of motions"?
- I have searched for a suitable word to explain a dependency of motions data for both planets on one another - and I have choose the word "Interaction"
- Earth and Jupiter motions data depend on Each other – that means- I can write Jupiter motion detailed data by analysis Earth Motion Data –
- The paper will discuss that as deep as possible to prove this point of view
- But how does that happen?
- The "Interaction of Motions" disproves the description supposes that the solar planets are separated rigid bodies revolve around the sun, each planet creation and motion data is independent from the others. "This description is incorrect"
- The solar planets are created from one trajectory of energy (or from one light beam) which had created the planet and its orbital distance to be complementary with the other planets data to create the general harmony of motions – that means- the solar group is one geometrical building and each planet is a part of it
- "The Motions Interaction" is a method to examine the planets creation and motion data origin and to answer (how this data be created)?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is There A Geometrical Shape For The SpaceGerges francis
Is There A Geometrical Shape For The Space?
Yes …
How to prove?
Let's see the moon orbit data in following:
1- Earth moon distance at perigee radius = the outer planets diameters total (1%)
2- Earth moon distance at apogee radius = the solar planets diameters total
3- The moon orbital distance between Perigee and apogee = Earth Circumference = the inner planets diameters total
4- Earth moon distance at total solar eclipse radius = Saturn Circumference
How to explain this data? Can we imagine that Saturn is created after the Earth Moon creation and Saturn used the moon Data
Imagine you have an area and you used partitions to create rooms and offices in this area – now – imagine that – these partitions are so transparent and can't be seen by any person – how to know if the partitions are found or not?
They prevent you to pass– when we don't see the partition it forces us to stop – the moon has to stop at defined points in its motion – the moon can't move beyond neither perigee nor apogee, where both points are defined by other calculations NOT related to the moon motion – even if we don't know yet by what geometrical mechanism the planets diameters total can restrict the moon motion! but because the same points are defined by other calculations that tell us – the restriction points were made by The Space Division and not by the moon motion – that's what I try to prove in this paper – and if I prove that the space is divided, that will prove my claim – "There's A Geometrical Shape For The Space"
Paper Contents
2- The Earth Moon Orbit Analysis
3- Jupiter Effect of the Earth Moon Creation and Motion
4- Mars Migration Theory Revision (The Earth Moon Creation)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
-Uranus axial tilt is perpendicular on the moon axial tilt, and this perpendicularity created the moon motion range (Perigee r=0.363 mk & Apogee r=0.406 mk)
Paper Main Idea
- The moon orbital triangle is declined by 1.1 degrees on the horizontal base to save the triangle values from Uranus perpendicularity effect on the moon orbit
- (Uranus axial tilt 97.8 deg – The moon axial tilt 6.7 deg =1.1 deg)
- The value 1.1 degrees is consumed in (0.5 deg "the moon angular diameter") and (0.6 degrees ")
- The value (0.6 degrees) shows Jupiter and Saturn motions effect on Mars motion, but this interaction between the 3 planets motions (Mars, Jupiter and Saturn) depends on the moon angular diameter "0.5 degrees". And because of that, the moon motion data effects and effected greatly by Mars motion… for example
o 687 days (Mars orbital period) = 27.3 days (the moon orbital period) x 25.2
o 13.18 deg (the moon motion daily)/ 0.526 deg (Mars motion daily) = 25.2 deg (Mars axial tilt) =
- This interaction of Mars and Moon motions is created because Jupiter and Saturn motions effect on Mars Motion is done based on the moon angular diameter "0.5 degrees", so this both values (0.5 degrees +0.6 degrees = 1.1 degrees) consisted together one result 1.1 degrees which Uranus aimed to create between both axial tilts (Uranus axial tilt and the moon axial tilt).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Uranus and Neptune are perpendicular on Saturn level
i.e. Saturn Orbital Distance locates at horizontal level with all planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn) – let's call it (Saturn level)
Uranus and Neptune are on vertical level related to Saturn level - let's call it ( Uranus level)
So Uranus level is perpendicular on Saturn level
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
Why does Saturn move during its day period (10.7 h) a distance = (373644 km) = 98.67% of Saturn Circumference (378675 km)?
The Question Explanation
- Better we need to ask (Why should Saturn move in its day period a distance = its circumference?), what geometrical effect can be produced by that?
- If a planet moves during its day period a distance = its Circumference, that creates a proportionality between this planet circumference, its orbital circumference, its day period and its orbital period, showing this planet motion data is defined based on each other.
- So, if a planet moves during its day period a distance = its circumference, that may create one question controls these 4 planet motion data.
- Saturn gives us this chance, but not accurately, because Saturn moves during its day period a distance = 98.67% of its Circumference (there's a difference between the 2 distances =1.33%)
- Where the difference is so small, the same result can be produced but with some complexities.
- The paper analyzes Saturn motion data to see if such equation can be defined and what difficulties are still found in its way.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (VI) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon motion has 2 orbits
The hypothesis explanation
- The Earth moon is so specific planet in the solar system and so effective in its general geometry
- Uranus and Neptune effect on the moon orbit creation and cause its regression by 19 degrees yearly
- Uranus and Neptune orbital inclinations are created by the effect on their interactions in the moon orbit
- Mars orbital inclination is created based on the moon orbit interactions
- The moon orbital motion has 2 orbits both perpendicular on one another
- Venus axial tilt and orbital inclination are created as a result of Uranus perpendicularity on the moon orbits.
Paper conclusion
- Many of Planets data can be created by their values only if there are 2 orbits for the moon motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Life Is Found On Earth Only (Claim)
-The Solar Planet Orbital Period is found based on geometrical reason.
-The Sun circles Earth during 365.25 days giving one Face always to the Earth which is The Life Reason On Earth
-The Life chance on Earth is found by a mentioned process based on the solar group geometrical structure and not found by any random process….
Mars Orbital Distance Is Changed Through History (Part II) Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis…
Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm and Mars has immigrated from it to dwell in the new point with Orbital Distance = 227.9 mkm
i.e.
Mars Was The Next Direct Planet After Mercury – where Mercury orbital distance =57.9 mkm and Mars orbital distance was 84 mkm
How to prove that?
Mars Daily Motion Data shows a great effect of Mercury on Mars Motion – which can't be explained unless by A Direct Effect Of The Neighbor Planet
How such effect can be found with a great distance?!
Mercury effected on Mars Creation and Motion Data when Mars was its neighbor with orbital distance =84 mkm – So When Mars has immigrated – the planet geometrical structure reserved this effect in its data – accordingly – Mars Motion Data shows clearly Mercury Effect on Mars Motion - which proves that Mars was the direct next neighbor of Mercury
Paper Question
Why Mars motion daily degrees (0.524 deg) = (1/ Mars orbital inclination 1.9 deg.)?
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current descriptionGerges francis
The basic challenge in the solar group study is the current description which contradicts with the solar planets data ….
Simply the solar group current description is unreal…! The planet doesn’t move by gravity, and no big bang is found in the universe origin..! Solar Planet motion can't be independent from other planets motions, on the contrary the planets motions work as gears motions, each planet causes the other planet to move!
In fact it's hard to examine this situation… the solar group current description is created based on the direct observation, regardless any planet data… which creates approximately a pure imaginary description…
This imaginary description is created also because of the basic definitions absence…(No definitions for …. distance, time, Energy, Force, Matter, Gravity, Light Nature, Field etc..). to see much we need to examine the eclipse phenomena
Example For Explanation – Total Solar Eclipse
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? i.e. Why we see the sun disc= the moon disc?
The answer is known.. because
(Sun Diameter / Moon Diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance / Earth Moon Distance)
Why? …..Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? Or
Planet orbital distance is defined by gravity …?! Let's try to answer
1st Critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
And/
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see it
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
But/
Uranus Diameter is Greater Than Neptune Diameter,
Where Neptune Mass is Greater Than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept!
Abstract
Paper question
How the matter is created?
The Question Explanation
(1)
- Uranus Day Period = 61920 seconds and
- (61920 seconds /12104 seconds) = 5.1 = (Venus velocity / Uranus velocity)
- Where 12104 km = Venus Diameter
(2)
- Saturn orbital period = 257928 hours = 10.7 hours x 12104 x 2
- Where 10.7 hours = Saturn Day Period
(3)
- 10.7 hours x 3600 seconds x π = 120536 seconds
- Where
- 120536 km = Saturn diameter and
- (12104 x π)2 = 120536 km x 12104 = Saturn Orbital Distance (error 1%)
- The paper argument tells that, the planet diameter is created based on geometrical calculations taken into consideration the other planets data
- Specifically, Venus diameter =12104 km because it's created based on geometrical calculations concerns Uranus Motion Data.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)Gerges francis
Abstract
The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover The Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory (Which Is A Square) And To Show The Imaginary One (An Ellipse)
i.e.
The Solar Planet Real Trajectory Is A Square But The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover This Real Trajectory And Shows The Imaginary One Which Is The An Ellipse…
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect (II)Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Venus & Mars Motions Causes To Create The Moon Orbit Regression
- In the paper No. (part I) of this series, I have claimed that, Mars & Venus Motion interactive effect causes the Earth Moon orbit to regress creating a new rate of time….
i.e.
- (Light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 day), this rate is found in the solar system out of the Earth moon orbit
- In the moon orbit the rate is (1 day of the sun = 1 year of Earth), this difference in rates is found by Venus & Mars motion effect on the moon orbit
But
- With what mechanism Venus and Mars do this effect? The data in the previous paper supports this claim strongly but no geometrical mechanism was explained in it – we have to do that in this paper
- As we know, the 1st rate of time is (1 to 86400) and the 2nd one is (1 to 365.25). so what Venus and Mars do, is to create the rate 237 which will cause the value 86400 to be equal 365.25, (237 = Venus rotation period/ Mars rotation period)
- The question which this paper tries to answer is (How Venus and Mars daily motion can produce this rate 237?, shortly by what mechanism this rate is produced?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter Gravity Effects On The Earth Moon Motion Gerges francis
Paper Claim
- Jupiter Mass Gravity Effects On The Earth Moon Motion
- Jupiter Mass Gravity Force Effect On The Earth Moon = 42% Of The Sun Mass Gravity Force Effect On Pluto
- Because the sun gravity keeps Pluto in its orbit, that tells Jupiter force must have an effect on the Earth moon motion
- Based on that, Jupiter gravity is the second force effect on the Earth moon motion
- Such effect can't be performed, neither by Mars because of its very small mass nor by Saturn because of its far distance
- That tells Jupiter Mass Gravity must have a greater effect on Mars motion than its effect on the Earth moon motion, and That's True and because of that (Mars Eccentricity = 0.094) but (The Moon Eccentricity = 0.055), proving that Jupiter gravity effect on Mars so greater than its effect on the Earth moon motion.
Shortly,
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Saturn Effect On The Solar Group Geometry
Saturn shows Clearly The Solar Group Geometrical Structure.
The Basic Hypothesis:
The Solar Group Is One Trajectory Of Energy And Each Planet Is A Point On This Same Trajectory…
i.e.
The Solar Planets (matter is energy because E=mc2) and their orbital distances (Space is Energy – hypothesis)both are created from the same energy which makes
The solar group as one body and each planet is a member of this same body.
Or
The solar group can be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the solar group is created depending on the cooperation and integration between the solar planets.
Saturn Effect
Saturn tells how the solar group is created based on the previous vision
i.e.
Saturn tells us which planet is created first and which second and what geometrical rule control this creation process.
Shortly
The solar group is one family, all planets are relatives to each other – but Saturn tells us who's brother to whom and who's uncle, who's parent and who's nephew
Saturn Data tells this fact clearly as the sun …Saturn Is The Solar Group Secret
We Complete Our Discussion In The Previous Paper
The Moon Creation And Motion
We use the previous paper as the Data source and in next papers we will try to understand this data as deep as possible
In this paper we have 3 basic questions to deal with – let's ask them in following:
1st Question
Does Matter Creation Process Uses The Time Period As An Essential Reference?
i.e. Is the Matter created with its defined period or can be in life forever?!
2nd Question
Why Mars So Specific Planet In The Solar System?
3rd Question
If (really) There's An Interaction between Mars & Earth Moon Motions, what geometrical mechanism behind to support this interaction?
Paper Objective
The Earth Moon is created by Mars Collision with Venus and Earth through Mars Motion in its Migration from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its new orbital distance (27.9 mkm) – This is my suggested theory "Mars Migration Theory"
Where the theory is supported strongly by "the Giant-Impact hypothesis" and many other geological proves
We try to know how the moon data is created based on this theory – we realize that Earth attracted the collisions debris and collected them together to create its Moon but why the moon diameter =3475 km? (for example) – the current description refers to that the answer should depend on The Earth Mass – but many planets data contradicts this direction of answer – that's why we provide our investigation to see as deep as possible trying to know what's happened after the collisions and enabled the Earth Moon to have its data
Note Please
Before any discussion we have to review Mars Migration Theory – because it's our basic point based on which we analyze the data – So we review it in (Point no. 4- Time Effect On Matter Creation Process) before the matter creation discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
,Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit, Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Earth Moon Orbit Is Created By A Geometrical Force More Complex Than The Masses Gravity Forces
Clearly – There's A Gab Between The Moon Orbit Creation Theory And Its Data – The Masses Gravity can't create the Moon Orbit
Because
The moon orbit is created based on many geometrical rules we don't see in the masses gravity forces
For Example
The moon motion (4) basic points which are:
Perigee Radius =363000 km (The most near point the moon can reach to the Earth)
Apogee Radius = 406000 km (The most far point the moon can reach from the Earth)
Total solar eclipse radius = 378000 km (Earth moon distance at total solar eclipse)
The moon orbital (registered) distance =384000 km
These 4 points can be produced by Pythagoras rule depending on each other by using the value (86000 km) as a dimension in the right-angle triangle
Similar to that – the moon orbit data is controlled by different geometrical rules has no roots in the masses gravity forces
Paper Question
Does the moon move by masses gravity forces? ……
Yes …
- The Light Motion Is The Distance Creator And Energy Provider
- The Planet Follows The Light Motion through the same distance and receives the energy
- The Planet Matter Is Created As A Function Of The Planet Motion
- After The Planet Matter Creation – The Created Matter resists To Save The Motion Based On Which The Matter Is Created – The Planets Matter Resistance Is Seen As Masses Gravity Forces
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Neptune data shows the solar group geometryGerges francis
Research Paper
"Neptune Data shows The Solar Group Geometry"
Abstract
Neptune Data supports the following conclusions:
1- The solar group is created from one energy only
2- The solar group is built by one geometrical structure and each planet is a part in this geometrical structure (or the solar group is a body and each planet is a member in it)
3- This geometrical structure causes to produce all solar planets data to be suitable for its job in this geometrical structure (which guarantees the planets motions harmony)
4- The solar planet motion real trajectory is square but we see it as an ellipse because of the moon orbit geometrical effect.
5- The Metonic Cycle (6939.75 days) is a motion in a vertical level relative to the solar inner planets horizontal level.
6- The moon orbit regression yearly 19 degrees is done because of Neptune and Uranus effect on the moon orbit geometrical structure.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves no.2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is Square And Not An Ellipse
This papers provides 2 proves for this claim
1- Earth Cycle (365+365+365+366) = 1461 days… the previous Cycle consists of 4 years and can be used as square form..! but the square is 4 equal distances and not periods of time…?! But We have discussed before that the time and distance values can be equivalent in some cases in the solar group geometrical structure… which means the value which we see as period of time may work as distance for another observer… (Why Earth has this 4 sidereal years Cycle?)
Please review
The Time definition
2- Mars Immigration proves that the solar planet motion trajectory is square and not an ellipse (This Paper discusses This Point Only)
Please review
Mars Immigration Proves (Revised)
Direction Of Energy Through The Solar Group Gerges francis
- The Solar Group Main Energy is sent from Jupiter to Pluto – This energy sending is continued for 2 sequence solar days
- Neptune used Jupiter Sent Energy consuming 16% of this total energy and the rest of Energy Neptune reflected it toward the inner planets into 2 Energy Trajectories.
o 1st Trajectory is sent to Earth (will be discussed Point No.4)
o 2nd Trajectory is sent to Mercury
- The 1st Trajectory of Energy is reached to Earth (with 86400mkm) – Where Earth reflected this energy into 2 new parts
o Part 1 the energy is sent from Earth to Venus
o Part 2 the energy is sent from Earth to (Jupiter & Uranus)
- The total energy (90000mkm) proves that all energy gathered together on one point only and no contradiction is found…
This explanation shows that the energy passes in cycle through the solar group
The previous idea supports my claim:
- The Solar Group is One Trajectory Of Energy and each planet is appoint on this same energy trajectory….. or
- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet is a part of this same geometrical structure (building)- i.e. Each planet data is created to be suitable for the required task of this planet in the whole building …..and
- No solar planet can be found or move independently
a. Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this same body. All solar planets and their orbital distances are created by the same energy (by the same blood all body members are created)
b. Or, The solar group be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the machine job depends on the gears different tasks.. and that means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the main base on which the solar group is created and move.
Paper hypothesis
-The Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets.
The hypothesis explanation
-The Earth moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km
-Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during (153.3 h) a distance = 2593836 km
-Why These Distances Are Equal?
-How the motion at distance be done? or by what geometrical mechanism the masses gravity causes a motion at distance? These questions still need answers
- The motion transportation among the planets can be answer for these questions.
- What does mean "A motion Transportation"?
- It means, a planet motion causes another planet to move, and this motion depends on the planet motion and not on its masses gravity only. That tells, the motion transportation process must be done based on new geometrical rules.
- If the paper hypothesis is true and the motion is transported among the solar planets, that will answer why these 2 distances are equal? Because the motion is transported from one planet to another and by that the 2 planets move equal distances in defined periods of time.
Paper objective
- The paper tries to prove that, the motion is transported from a planet to another planet through the solar system and this motion transportation caused Pluto motion distance during its day period to be = the moon displacements total
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Questions
How to describe the Moon Motion Trajectory?
Let's review our conclusions in following:
- The research 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- The research 2nd one (light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 day)
- The 2nd hypothesis tells that there are different rates of time in the solar system,
- The basic rule tells (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
The Moon Orbital Motion Trajectory:
- Earth moves per solar day a distance =2.58 million km with an angle =0.985 deg on the horizontal line, the moon moves a very similar motion to Earth motion
- If there's no (Lorentz Length Contraction phenomenon) in the solar system, the moon motion would be as a parallel line to Earth motion trajectory … but
- Because of the contraction rate (1.0725) the moon motion distance daily (2.58 mkm) is contracted to be 2.41 mkm
- The difference (2.58 mkm -2.41 mkm) is a distance required necessary to be added to the moon motion distance to save the moon and Earth motions accompanying.
- 0.17 mkm is required to be passed daily
- The moon moves daily a displacement =88000 km depending on Earth Gravity
- But, Earth Mass = The 4 Inner Planets Masses Total (error 1%)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (II)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
There's an interaction between Earth and Jupiter Motions
The hypothesis Explanation
- What does mean "an interaction of motions"?
- I have searched for a suitable word to explain a dependency of motions data for both planets on one another - and I have choose the word "Interaction"
- Earth and Jupiter motions data depend on Each other – that means- I can write Jupiter motion detailed data by analysis Earth Motion Data –
- The paper will discuss that as deep as possible to prove this point of view
- But how does that happen?
- The "Interaction of Motions" disproves the description supposes that the solar planets are separated rigid bodies revolve around the sun, each planet creation and motion data is independent from the others. "This description is incorrect"
- The solar planets are created from one trajectory of energy (or from one light beam) which had created the planet and its orbital distance to be complementary with the other planets data to create the general harmony of motions – that means- the solar group is one geometrical building and each planet is a part of it
- "The Motions Interaction" is a method to examine the planets creation and motion data origin and to answer (how this data be created)?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is There A Geometrical Shape For The SpaceGerges francis
Is There A Geometrical Shape For The Space?
Yes …
How to prove?
Let's see the moon orbit data in following:
1- Earth moon distance at perigee radius = the outer planets diameters total (1%)
2- Earth moon distance at apogee radius = the solar planets diameters total
3- The moon orbital distance between Perigee and apogee = Earth Circumference = the inner planets diameters total
4- Earth moon distance at total solar eclipse radius = Saturn Circumference
How to explain this data? Can we imagine that Saturn is created after the Earth Moon creation and Saturn used the moon Data
Imagine you have an area and you used partitions to create rooms and offices in this area – now – imagine that – these partitions are so transparent and can't be seen by any person – how to know if the partitions are found or not?
They prevent you to pass– when we don't see the partition it forces us to stop – the moon has to stop at defined points in its motion – the moon can't move beyond neither perigee nor apogee, where both points are defined by other calculations NOT related to the moon motion – even if we don't know yet by what geometrical mechanism the planets diameters total can restrict the moon motion! but because the same points are defined by other calculations that tell us – the restriction points were made by The Space Division and not by the moon motion – that's what I try to prove in this paper – and if I prove that the space is divided, that will prove my claim – "There's A Geometrical Shape For The Space"
Paper Contents
2- The Earth Moon Orbit Analysis
3- Jupiter Effect of the Earth Moon Creation and Motion
4- Mars Migration Theory Revision (The Earth Moon Creation)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
-Uranus axial tilt is perpendicular on the moon axial tilt, and this perpendicularity created the moon motion range (Perigee r=0.363 mk & Apogee r=0.406 mk)
Paper Main Idea
- The moon orbital triangle is declined by 1.1 degrees on the horizontal base to save the triangle values from Uranus perpendicularity effect on the moon orbit
- (Uranus axial tilt 97.8 deg – The moon axial tilt 6.7 deg =1.1 deg)
- The value 1.1 degrees is consumed in (0.5 deg "the moon angular diameter") and (0.6 degrees ")
- The value (0.6 degrees) shows Jupiter and Saturn motions effect on Mars motion, but this interaction between the 3 planets motions (Mars, Jupiter and Saturn) depends on the moon angular diameter "0.5 degrees". And because of that, the moon motion data effects and effected greatly by Mars motion… for example
o 687 days (Mars orbital period) = 27.3 days (the moon orbital period) x 25.2
o 13.18 deg (the moon motion daily)/ 0.526 deg (Mars motion daily) = 25.2 deg (Mars axial tilt) =
- This interaction of Mars and Moon motions is created because Jupiter and Saturn motions effect on Mars Motion is done based on the moon angular diameter "0.5 degrees", so this both values (0.5 degrees +0.6 degrees = 1.1 degrees) consisted together one result 1.1 degrees which Uranus aimed to create between both axial tilts (Uranus axial tilt and the moon axial tilt).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Uranus and Neptune are perpendicular on Saturn level
i.e. Saturn Orbital Distance locates at horizontal level with all planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn) – let's call it (Saturn level)
Uranus and Neptune are on vertical level related to Saturn level - let's call it ( Uranus level)
So Uranus level is perpendicular on Saturn level
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
- The moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2.5986 mkm
- The moon apogee circumference =2.550973 mkm
- The difference 47720 km
- Because the apogee orbit (r= 406000 km) is the most far point the moon can reach from Earth, the question is raised that (why the moon apogee orbital circumference doesn't equal its displacements total during 29.53 days?)
- The provided answer told that, because of the moon orbital inclination effect, this answer contains a reference that the moon orbital inclination 5.1 deg is created by an effect of Pluto orbital inclination 17.2 deg…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
A Solar Group Suggested Description:
1- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet is a part of this same building- i.e. Each Planet is created to be a complementary to the other planets and No solar planet is created or move independently
2- The solar group can be similar to one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this same trajectory.
3- Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this same body.
4- Also, The solar group can be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the machine works as one group.. that means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the main base on which the solar group is created and move.
How to understand that?
WE know that the matter is created of Energy (E=mc2) – but How The Space Is Created? I suppose that the Space is created of Energy also… (Space = Energy)
So the matter and space both are created from the same energy..
Can that be possible?
The Energy has different forms (sun rays – nuclear interactions – oil- food ..etc)
Different forms for the same content….
So it's possible to create matter and space of the same energy…
I have another example to support that…
In double slit experiment (Young Experiment) – the light coherence produced bright and dark fringes –regardless the theoretical explanation – the experiment tells "when one input is used(light)– outputs can be in 2 different forms (bright and dark fringes)"
The Solar Group Creation
I suppose the solar group is one energy creates the planet matter and orbital distance – so this same energy passes through the whole group to create all solar planets and their orbital distances from the same energy where this energy creates all planets data depending on each other because all of them are created from the same source.
Shortly
The solar group is one thread – as one necklace – all solar planets and their distances are created from one energy to be complementary to each other- and that's why the planets data analysis show the solar planets dependency.
Why Earth moves Daily A Distance = The Moon Orbit CircumferenceGerges francis
The Moon Orbit Data shows A Geometrical Structure more complex than the Current theories can explain … Let's refer to it in following:
- Perigee Radius (R1) = Earth Moon Distance = 363000 km (Earth Nearest Point)
- Eclipse Radius (R2) = Earth Moon Distance = 377000km (Total Solar Eclipse Point)
- Average Radius (R3) = Earth Moon Distance = 384000 km (Registered Value)
- Apogee Radius (R4) =Earth Moon Distance = 406000km (The Most Far Point)
Earth Daily Motion 2.58 mkm = The Moon Orbit Circumference at apogee (R4)..why?
The Data
I. Earth Moon Distance at Perigee Point = The Outer Planets Diameters Total
II. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee Point = The Solar Planets Diameters Total
III. The Distance Between Perigee & Apogee Points = the inner planets Diameters total = Earth Circumference
IV. Earth Moon Distance (At Total Solar Eclipse Radius) = Saturn Circumference.
V. The Solar Planets Diameters Total = Saturn Diameter +2 Jupiter Diameters
The Moon Orbit Main Points: (Perigee - Solar Eclipse – Average- Apogee)
These points are defined based on the following geometrical rules:
1- (1st Rule) "R2n + (86000km)2= R2n+1" (Pythagoras Rule)
2- (2nd Rule) "2πRn= (1/Rn+1)" (Reflective Values)
3- (3rd Rule) "(2πRn+1/ 2πRn) =1.0725" (Relativities Effects)
(We should prove these rules in this paper)
The Conclusions
1- The Gravity Force Can't Create The Moon Orbit
2- The Space is A Geometrical Player In The Solar Group Geometry
3- There are relativistic effects in the solar Group
4- The Relativistic effects cause geometrical rules control the general geometrical structure (i.e. the higher velocity creates specific form for the space in which it travels)
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
-Earth (29.8 km/s) moves during (24 hours) a distance = 2574720 km
- The Earth moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km
- Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during (153.3 h) a distance = 2593836 km
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 378675 seconds a distance = 2574990 km
- Mars (24.1km/s) moves during 29.53 hours a distance = 2562023 km
- Why These Distances Are Equal Approximately? (The difference 1%)
Paper Claim
- The paper claims, these distances are equal to enable Pluto to move during its day period a distance = the moon displacements total during its day period, because the equality of these distances has a geometrical necessity for the solar system motion.
- The claim depends on a new description for the solar system which is:
o The solar group is one building and each planet is a part of it
o The solar planets move one unified motion as train carriages
o The solar group is one machine can be considered as (A Great Clock)
o The solar planets data is created depending on one another.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
"Research Hypothesis"
Solar Planets Data Are Created Based On One Equation Only
The Hypothesis Explanation
Solar planets data such as Planet Diameter – Orbital Distance – Orbital Period - Orbital Inclination- Axial Tilt…..etc
All this data is created based on One Equation Only
This paper has 3 objectives which are:
1st to prove the research hypothesis
2nd to explain "how to analyze planets data to conclude the geometrical rules behind it"
3rd to discuss the theoretical basics, on which this one equation is created
Why The Earth Moon Distance = The Planets Diameters Total (III) Gerges francis
Paper Question
Why The Earth Moon Distance (At Apogee Radius) = The Planets Diameters Total?
Because
(1)
The Matter Is Created Based On Its Motion –
That means
The moon daily displacement =88000 km – is the reason based on which– the moon diameter is created to be = 3475 km –
This fact can be proved by analyze Saturn Creation and Motion Data
(Point No. 2 of this paper discusses this question)
(2)
We Still Analyze The Moon Orbit Geometrical Structure, Where the moon orbit shows that there's a geometrical design forces the moon to move specific motion and specific displacement daily
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter uranus distance (metonic cycle reason)Gerges francis
Metonic Cycle is Energy sent from Uranus to the moon
Pluto also effects on Metonic Cycle and that explains his data convenience with Earth and Moon Data
Jupiter And Mercury Motions Analysis (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Paper Conclusion
- The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form And Based On One Geometrical Design.
- Means
- The distances be distributed based on geometrical design in comparison with other distances and no a single distance be created independent from the other distances
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Mars Orbital Distance Is Changed Through HistoryGerges francis
I- The Paper Claim:
- The Solar Planets Order was (Pluto – Mercury – Mars ……..etc)
But
- Mars Ancient Orbital Distance was 84 millions km, found after Mercury Immediately….
- Pluto was before Mercury in order and nearer to the sun (or may Pluto was the Mercury Moon)
- This order I suggest based on the rule "Greater Diameter Needs Greater Orbital Distance". (This Rule Is Discussed In This Paper Introduction)
Then
- Mars immigrated and dwelt in its new point with orbital distance = 227.9 mkm.
- Mars Immigration was process has a great effect on the solar group especially on Pluto (the smallest planet). And As a result of it, Pluto also immigrated and dwelt in its new point with orbital distance =5870 mkm
- The Planet diameter and orbital distance rule is (A Greater Diameter needs A Greater Orbital Distance) is disturbed by Mars and Pluto Immigration.
- Mars is Exceptional Planet in different arguments because of its immigration..
I- The Claim Explanation:
How to prove this fact?
- The Solar Group is One Body (Building) – If this is a fact- So, Each Planet Data is created based on the other planets data –i.e. if Mars changed his orbital distance through the solar group history – This Change should be Registered in the solar planets data-
i.e.
- Mars Immigration Argument Is Another Proof For The Claim ….… "The Solar Group Is One Body and Each Planet is A Member Of It", Or "The Solar Group Is One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Same Building"…
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Revised And Modified).pdfGerges francis
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Revised And Modified)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis no. (1)
- The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design
Paper hypothesis no. (2)
- The Solar Planets And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Light Beam
Paper hypothesis no. (3)
- This Light Beam Travels With A Velocity 1.16 Million Km Per Second
Paper hypotheses Explanation
- Hypothesis no. (1)
- The hypothesis tells, the solar system be created based on one geometrical design, means, the planets dimensions and data be defined by one equation and can be concluded based on one another – this fact the paper proves clearly –
- The paper provides 4 equations which can be considered as a discovery, by them we can conclude the planets fact sheet theoretically without observation, let's prove that by introducing the first equation of them
- d2= 4d0 (d- d0) where (d =planet orbital distance) and (d0 = previous planet orb. dis.)
- The equation tells, the distance from the sun to Pluto be distributed geometrically in order regardless the planets data – neither their masses nor their diameters – simply the distance be distributed geometrically regardless planets data –
- (The paper tests and proves the equation) - let's provide the 2nd equation
- (d1/d2) = (v2/v1)2 where (d = planet orbital distance) and (v= planet velocity),
- The equation doesn't use the planets order as the first one –
- The 4 equations tells one clear information which is
- If we know (Mercury orbital distance =57.9 mkm), By use these 4 equations, we can conclude theoretically all planets orbital distances, periods, velocities, their diameters, rotation periods, masses, orbital inclinations and axial tilts. This data we conclude theoretically without observation by these 4 equations
- The next question should be Why? hypothesis no. (2) answers -Because,
- The Solar Planets And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Light Beam.
- This is similar to Young Experiment (the double slits experiment), the sun rays produces bright fringes and dark fringes (One Design) (If we accept that, we have to suppose the bright fringes be seen by us as matters and the dark as space)
- The paper proves this fact also, by analysis of Lorentz length contraction effect and tries to answer the question (Why does Particle length be contracted by its high velocity motion?)
- But, the complexity isn't finished
- The light beam based on which the solar planets and their distances be created, this light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second!!
- And how to prove this fact? and from where we know this number 1.16 mkm/s?? (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Jupiter and mercury motions analysis (revised) (2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper hypothesis
- The motion is transported between Venus, Saturn and Uranus
The hypothesis explanation
- Because the solar group is a clock and
- There's a rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours) between Venus & Uranus Motions (as supposed in the previous paper)
- The motion is considered to be transported among the planets as similar to the motion transportation among the gears.
- But
- The planets aren't gears. Because of that, some different rules should control the motion transportation process (if it's found really)
Paper objective
- The paper provides a new example of (a motion transportation among the planets), in this example, the paper discussion tries to conclude the basic rules on which the motion can be transported among the planets.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar system motion analysis (questions and answers)Gerges francis
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
- This paper contains 5 questions and their answers concerning the solar system motion analysis
The Questions Are:
- Question no. (1). Why should The solar Planets Data Analysis be considered a basic tool in the solar system motion research? (page no. 2)
- Question no. (2) Can far planets (as Jupiter and Uranus) effect on the Earth moon motion? (page no. 5)
- Question no. (3) Can the classical mechanics explain the solar system motion? (page no. 14)
- Question no. (4) How The Sun Is Created? (page no. 18)
- Question no. (5) Why couldn't Titius Bode Law predict Neptune’s orbital distance? (page no. 34)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramidGerges francis
I claim that
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramid Form
Where the sun is in the Pyramid Head
And the solar outer planets form the Pyramid Base….
This paper tries to prove this fact..
Light Effects On Plant Motion By Undefined Force Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-Light Motion Effects On Planet Motion By Undefined Force
The hypothesis Explanation
-The solar system motions can't be explained by Classical Machines Laws!
-Because Light motion effects on planet motion by undefined force, resulting all classical mechanics laws clearly be violated by planets motions.
Example No. (1)
o Jupiter velocity =13.1 km/sec, i.e. Jupiter needs to move during 10921 seconds to pass a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter, where 10921 km = the Earth moon circumference! And
o (Jupiter orbital circumference = Jupiter circumference x 10921)
o Uranus velocity =6.8 km, i.e. Uranus needs to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance = 51118 km = Uranus diameter, where 7511 km = Pluto circumference
o (Uranus Pluto distance =Pluto velocity per solar day x 7511)
Example No. (2)
o 13.18 degrees = the moon motion degrees per solar day/ 0.526 degrees (Mars motion degrees per solar day) =25.2 (where Mars axial tilt =25.2 deg)
o (687 days Mars orbital period = 27.3 days the moon orbital period) x 25.2
Example No. (3)
o Light velocity (0.3mkm/sec) = Earth velocity x 10000 But
o 365.25 days (Earth year) x 27.3 days (the moon orbital period) =10000
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
The Earth Moon Is Created By Mars Collisions With of Venus & Earth
(This Suggested Theory Is Supported By The Giant-Impact Hypothesis)
Mars Migration Theory:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time (II)Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- We still discuss this same rule which we have discovered and tested in the previous paper…What we try to do here?
- I hope to test this same rule again in more planets data – because this rule gives an essential key to explain planets data creation, and this rule supports my research 2 basic hypothesis which are
- Hypothesis No. 1 (Planet motion depends on light motion)
- Hypothesis No. 2 (Light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 solar day)
- Based on these 2 hypotheses this rule is concluded that (equal distances are use for different rates of time) –
- This rule is so interesting to be used because I have discovered many equal distances in the solar system but couldn't explain why these distances are equal – for that reason – this rule gives us a crucial key to answer this question
Let's remember the research progress points – where I have discovered light motion features in planet motion (13 features) and because of that I had to suggest my research 1st hypothesis and then the 2nd one – where the research 2nd hypothesis suggests that (there are different rates of time found in the solar system motion), then by analysis to know how these different rates of time are created and working, I have concluded this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) and now we test this rule in different examples to know it it's a correct one, if we prove that, this rule is a correct one that will support the research 2 hypothesis and its whole concept
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Similar to Venus And Uranus Motions Interaction (20)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate PathwayAADYARAJPANDEY1
Normal Cell Metabolism:
Cellular respiration describes the series of steps that cells use to break down sugar and other chemicals to get the energy we need to function.
Energy is stored in the bonds of glucose and when glucose is broken down, much of that energy is released.
Cell utilize energy in the form of ATP.
The first step of respiration is called glycolysis. In a series of steps, glycolysis breaks glucose into two smaller molecules - a chemical called pyruvate. A small amount of ATP is formed during this process.
Most healthy cells continue the breakdown in a second process, called the Kreb's cycle. The Kreb's cycle allows cells to “burn” the pyruvates made in glycolysis to get more ATP.
The last step in the breakdown of glucose is called oxidative phosphorylation (Ox-Phos).
It takes place in specialized cell structures called mitochondria. This process produces a large amount of ATP. Importantly, cells need oxygen to complete oxidative phosphorylation.
If a cell completes only glycolysis, only 2 molecules of ATP are made per glucose. However, if the cell completes the entire respiration process (glycolysis - Kreb's - oxidative phosphorylation), about 36 molecules of ATP are created, giving it much more energy to use.
IN CANCER CELL:
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
introduction to WARBERG PHENOMENA:
WARBURG EFFECT Usually, cancer cells are highly glycolytic (glucose addiction) and take up more glucose than do normal cells from outside.
Otto Heinrich Warburg (; 8 October 1883 – 1 August 1970) In 1931 was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology for his "discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme.
WARNBURG EFFECT : cancer cells under aerobic (well-oxygenated) conditions to metabolize glucose to lactate (aerobic glycolysis) is known as the Warburg effect. Warburg made the observation that tumor slices consume glucose and secrete lactate at a higher rate than normal tissues.
Richard's entangled aventures in wonderlandRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
The increased availability of biomedical data, particularly in the public domain, offers the opportunity to better understand human health and to develop effective therapeutics for a wide range of unmet medical needs. However, data scientists remain stymied by the fact that data remain hard to find and to productively reuse because data and their metadata i) are wholly inaccessible, ii) are in non-standard or incompatible representations, iii) do not conform to community standards, and iv) have unclear or highly restricted terms and conditions that preclude legitimate reuse. These limitations require a rethink on data can be made machine and AI-ready - the key motivation behind the FAIR Guiding Principles. Concurrently, while recent efforts have explored the use of deep learning to fuse disparate data into predictive models for a wide range of biomedical applications, these models often fail even when the correct answer is already known, and fail to explain individual predictions in terms that data scientists can appreciate. These limitations suggest that new methods to produce practical artificial intelligence are still needed.
In this talk, I will discuss our work in (1) building an integrative knowledge infrastructure to prepare FAIR and "AI-ready" data and services along with (2) neurosymbolic AI methods to improve the quality of predictions and to generate plausible explanations. Attention is given to standards, platforms, and methods to wrangle knowledge into simple, but effective semantic and latent representations, and to make these available into standards-compliant and discoverable interfaces that can be used in model building, validation, and explanation. Our work, and those of others in the field, creates a baseline for building trustworthy and easy to deploy AI models in biomedicine.
Bio
Dr. Michel Dumontier is the Distinguished Professor of Data Science at Maastricht University, founder and executive director of the Institute of Data Science, and co-founder of the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) data principles. His research explores socio-technological approaches for responsible discovery science, which includes collaborative multi-modal knowledge graphs, privacy-preserving distributed data mining, and AI methods for drug discovery and personalized medicine. His work is supported through the Dutch National Research Agenda, the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Horizon Europe, the European Open Science Cloud, the US National Institutes of Health, and a Marie-Curie Innovative Training Network. He is the editor-in-chief for the journal Data Science and is internationally recognized for his contributions in bioinformatics, biomedical informatics, and semantic technologies including ontologies and linked data.
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Sérgio Sacani
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
In silico drugs analogue design: novobiocin analogues.pptx
Venus And Uranus Motions Interaction
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Venus And Uranus Motions Interaction
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo –Egypt –5th
April 2021
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Uranus, Venus and the sun are on one straight line (180 degrees), found vertically
on the solar planets revolutions direction.
The hypothesis Explanation
- This hypothesis is an imaginary idea - the paper doesn't try to prove it – but the
paper tries to show a deep dependency found between Venus and Uranus motions
Data and this dependency harmony with the sun data –
- Let's try to explain this hypothesis meaning in following:
o We know that Venus orbital inclination is 3.4 degrees, by that, the angle
between Earth ecliptic line and Venus orbital circumference line is 3.4
degrees, means , Earth an Venus revolve around the sun one the same level
(approximately) where the angle between both motions 3.4 degrees
o Imagine Uranus is NOT found on this horizontal level but found under
Venus vertically – that means – Venus and Uranus are found on 2 different
steps horizontally where there's an angle =90 degrees between Venus and
Uranus positions
o Imagine, the sun is found vertically above Venus and has an angle =90
degrees between the sun and Venus positions
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
o By this description Venus is a point on the vertical straight line connecting
Uranus and the sun
Notice
- We don’t need to believe this story – we suppose it to test – if it's possible to find
some planet in perpendicular position toward another planet –and this experiment
can produce different result- means- we may find some perpendicularity between
some data but not between the positions – for example – 91.1 degrees is found
between Uranus axial tilt and the moon axial tilt – means- we may find
perpendicularity in some specific data –
Shortly
- The hypothesis is suggested to enable us to examine both planets data to see if this
data can give us some proof for this hypothesis – and based on this data
examination we may modify the hypothesis to more acceptable one.
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
1- Introduction
- This figure tries to form the idea
- The vertical straight line (Uranus – Venus- The Sun) =180 deg.
- From where this idea is created?
- 177.4 deg (Venus Axial Tilt) + 3.4 deg (Venus orbital inclination)
= 180.8 degrees
- But
- 0.8 degrees = Uranus Orbital Inclination
- That means, Uranus orbital inclination (0.8 deg) uses 180
degrees to reach to Venus – so this figure is created-
- Whatsoever this figure effect positive or negative –the question
is still found behind – Why (177.4 +3.4 )= 180.8?
- The data – as I consider- shows Uranus effect on Venus Data – if
this guess is a correct or not – we need to know – so we should
examine many other data of Venus and Uranus to know if really Uranus can effect
on Venus Data and causes this data to be created according to the values defined
by Uranus!
- Many data can support this meaning – but no geometrical reason we can catch – by
that- we can't explain planets motions data, For that the paper is written between,
because the data is found but its explanation theory is absent – let's see some of
this data in following
(1)
o Venus (35 km/s) moves during 12104 seconds a distance = 423640 km =
Uranus motion distance during Uranus day period…
o 12104 km = Venus Diameter
(2)
o Venus (3.02 mkm/day) moves during 12104 days a distance = 2 x 18040
mkm (Uranus orbital circumference) (error 1.4%)
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
o How to explain this data? can that be pure coincidence of numbers?!
o But …
o (Venus velocity 35 / Uranus velocity 6.8) = (Mars velocity 24.1/ Pluto
velocity 4.7) = 5.14
- As we see the data is so strange, but known geometrical or physical rules can
explain how this data is created…
Paper Objective
- We examine the data to know how this data is created? and based on what
geometrical rules this data is produced…
- The concluded geometrical rules may help us to modify the hypothesis to be more
sufficient.
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
2- Venus & Uranus Motions Interaction
2-1 Venus & Uranus Diameters Analysis
2-2 Venus & Uranus Degrees Analysis
2-3 Venus & Uranus Cycles Analysis
2-4 The General Discussion
2-1 Venus & Uranus Diameters Analysis
I- Data
(1)
1392000 km (the sun diameter) = 51118 km (Uranus diameter) x 27.2 = 12104 km
(Venus Diameter) x 115
(2)
116.75 = 115 x (180/177.4)
(3)
27.2 solar days = 2 x 19 x 17.2 hours (Uranus Day Period)
(4)
51118 km (Uranus diameter)/ 12104 km (Venus Diameter) = 4.22
But
(Uranus Mass) / (Venus Mass) = (4.22)2
(5)
(12104 km)2
x 19 = 2764.3 mkm
(6)
Venus (35 km/s) moves during 12104 seconds a distance = 423640 km = Uranus
motion distance during Uranus day period…(12104 km = Venus Diameter)
And
Venus (3.02 mkm/day) moves during 12104 days a distance = 2 x 18040 mkm
(Uranus orbital circumference) (error 1.4%)
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
II- Discussion
- The previous data analyzes Uranus and Venus Diameters…. The feeling we
receive from this examination is that – these 2 diameters effect on the sun diameter
creation
- The sun creation process is not our subject here – we need to examine the data as
possible – so, I need to explain this feeling to prove that it's created based on
geometrical effects – let's move with the data step by step
Equation No. (1)
1392000 km (the sun diameter) = 51118 km (Uranus diameter) x 27.2 = 12104 km
(Venus Diameter) x 115
- The claim tells that, Uranus and Venus diameters are rated to the sun diameter
based on some geometrical rules – if so- the values 115 (for Venus) and 27.2 (for
Uranus) must be found based on geometrical rules… let's test that in following…
Equation No. (2)
116.75 = 115 x (180/177.4)
- 116.75 days = Venus Day Period
- 177.4 degrees = Venus Axial Tilt
o Equation No. 2 has 3 of Venus data, all of them are created based on each
other – as the equation shows –
o Venus diameter is rated to the sun diameter (115) by a rate = the rate
between Venus axial tilt and 180 degrees – no way to crate this data by
chance, it's created based on geometrical rules… but what rules?
o The data cooperates together to be in harmony with the rate (115) which is
found between The Sun Diameter And Venus Diameter.
o So, the number (115) is found based on geometrical rules…
Equation No. (3)
27.2 solar days = 2 x 19 x 17.2 hours (Uranus Day Period)
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
- The period 27.2 days (the nodal month) = 19 x 2 x 17.2 hours (Uranus day period),
Why?
o Uranus orbital distance 2872.5 mkm= 19 x 149.6 mkm Earth orbital distance
o Uranus Axial Tilt 97.8 deg = 19 x 5.14 degrees
o The moon lunar year 327.6 days = 19 x 17.2 days
o 19 degrees = 23.6 deg x 0.8 degrees
o Where
o If 1 day = 1 hour so, the lunar year data will be in consistency
o And
o 23.6 degrees = the outer planets orbital inclinations total and
o 23.4 degrees = Earth Axial Tilt = 23.6 deg x 0.99
(Errors around 1%)
- The data tells that, the number (19) shows a strong connection between Uranus and
Earth – because of that – I claim – the moon Metonic Cycle must be created as an
effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth moon motion.
- We don't know the geometrical rules based on which this data is created- but who
can claim that this data is created by any pure coincidences or random process –
geometrical rules must be found behind of course – but what are these rules?
- The conclusion we have searched for is that –
- Uranus and Venus diameters are created in proportionality with the sun diameter
based on geometrical rules – the data supports this conclusion – but – we still can't
catch the geometrical mechanism by which this proportionality is found
- The next questions will be – How the sun diameter can be in proportionality with
the 2 planets diameters? The sun or these 2 planets created first? How any of these
3 objects creation can effect one another? And by what mechanism that's done?
- Our discussion moves beyond the usual simple question – we don't need here to
know if the matter is created out of light – We need specifically to know How
Uranus And Venus Diameters Be In Proportionality With The Sun Diameter?
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
Equation No. (4)
51118 km (Uranus diameter)/ 12104 km (Venus Diameter) = 4.22
But
(Uranus Mass) / (Venus Mass) = (4.22)2
- We have some support here –
- The 2 planets diameters rate is the root of their masses rate.
- Why this is useful?
- I wish to find some help in this discussion – the data shows clear dependency one
another and no geometrical rules we can catch yet to explain how this data is
created – one the side – no logic to consider such strong data as results of pure
coincidences of numbers – it's directed data shows clearly geometrical effects…
Equation No. (5)
(12104 km)2
x 19 = 2764.3 mkm (error 0.7%)
- Equation no (5) adds more support for the same claim, where the rate 19 is used
with Venus as with Earth – but that's not clear!
- The number (19) is a specific number of the relationship between Uranus and
Earth – it's strange to be used with Venus Diameter
- But
149.6 mkm = 1.392 mkm x 108.2 mkm (Venus Orbital Distance)
- Where
- 149.6 mkm = Earth Orbital Distance
- 1.392 mkm = The Sun Diameter
- This equation shows that, the 2 planets orbital distances are rated by the sun
diameter – it's the same connection point with Uranus – as we have discussed in
this discussion point -
- The sun diameter is the goal behind all this data and because of that the
proportionality aims to define it frequently, but the geometrical mechanism by
which the sun diameter is defined still absent.
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
Notice
- 12756 mkm = 670.4 mkm (Venus Jupiter Distance) x 19
- Where 12756 km = Earth diameter
Equation No. (6)
Venus (35 km/s) moves during 12104 seconds a distance = 423640 km = Uranus
motion distance during Uranus day period…(12104 km = Venus Diameter)
And
Venus (3.02 mkm/day) moves during 12104 days a distance = 2 x 18040 mkm
(Uranus orbital circumference) (error 1.4%)
- Let's support this data meaning by more data
- Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 10921 seconds distance =142984 km = Jupiter
diameter (Where 10921 km = the moon circumference)
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 7510 seconds distance =51118 km = Uranus
diameter (Where 7510 km = Uranus circumference).
- Planet circumference using as a period of time, it's a usual using in the solar
system and frequently found in the planets motions data – how the planet
circumference be used as a period of time? I can't explain! And why? this last
question is more important than the first one – we even don't know this using
effect on the planets motions-
- What we can say is that
o Planet Diameter Is Created Based On Geometrical Calculations, even if the
planets are effected by collisions between each other – their diameters be
defined based on geometrical calculations – almost that's done by light
motion effect on planet motion – where light motion creates geometrical
effects on matter and space dimensions – which till now can't be defined
geometrically or be explainable!
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
2-2 Venus & Uranus Degrees Analysis
Please remember
180.8 deg = 177.4 deg (V. Axial Tilt) +3.4 deg (V. Orbital inclination)
0.8 deg = Uranus orbital inclination but 0.8 deg +180 = 180.8 degrees
I- Data
(7)
17.34 deg = 5.1 deg x 3.4 deg
(8)
177.4 deg = 98.6 deg x 1.8 deg
(9)
3.4 deg =4.25 deg x 0.8 deg
But 3.4 deg =4.2 deg - 0.8 deg
(10)
23.36 deg = 29.2 deg x 0.8 deg
But 23.6 deg = 29.53 deg x 0.8 deg
(11)
Tan (23.4) x 95.6 = 41.4
II- Discussion
Equation No. (7)
17.34 deg = 5.1 deg x 3.4 deg
- 17.4 degrees = The Inner Planets Orbital Inclinations Total
- 5.1 degrees = The moon Orbital Inclination
- 3.4 degrees = Venus Orbital Inclination
- 17.2 degrees = Pluto Orbital Inclination (= 99% of 17.4 degrees)
- This idea is some how complex – this data is started by 17.2 hours (Uranus day
Period), this value is transported into Pluto to be 17.2 degrees (Pluto Orbital
Inclination), and this process is done by great effect, which cause Pluto day period
to be so long period (153.3 h) in comparison with all outer planets days periods
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
- Pluto Orbital Inclination (17.2 deg) causes the inner planets orbital inclinations
total to be 17.4 degrees – based on which the moon and Venus orbital inclinations
are created rated to each other.
Equation No. (8)
177.4 deg = 98.6 deg x 1.8 deg
- 98.6 degrees = (97.8 deg Uranus axial tilt + 0.8 Uranus orb, inclination)
- 1.8 degrees = Neptune orbital inclination
- 177.4 degrees = Venus Axial Tilt
- The data tells, Venus axial tilt is created depends on Uranus & Neptune
- We know that, (Venus diameter 12104 km/ Mars diameter 6792 km) =1.774 and
that may tell, Venus Axial Tilt was 1.774 deg and became 177.4 deg.
- Let's summarize the idea here-
o I claim that, Uranus and Pluto axial tilts cooperate together to create unified
effect (of regression) through the solar system
o This force effects on Venus and causes its axial tilt to be regressed
o Also this force effects on the moon orbit and causes its regression yearly 19
degrees as a result of Metonic Cycle
o But, 1.44 deg =1.8 deg (Neptune orbital inclination) x 0.8 deg (Uranus
orbital inclination), This equation shows that Neptune has also an effect
with Uranus on the moon orbit regression
o This meaning is supported by the next equation
Equation No. (9)
3.4 deg =4.25 deg x 0.8 deg But 3.4 deg =4.2 deg - 0.8 deg
- There are 2 information we need in this equation – which are
o (1) The difference between 4.25 and 4.2 degrees = 1%
o Because there are many data has error 1%, we conclude that, this error (1%) is
found by some geometrical necessity – we still don't know this geometrical
necessity but – this error has a great effect on the solar system geometry…
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
o (2), Uranus diameter 51118 km = 4 x 12756 km (Earth diameter) and
because of that the rate (4) has specific effect on Earth motion – and we may
conclude that this rate effect create the cycle 1461 days of earth motion
o 4.25 degrees x 4 = 17 degrees
o 17 deg = 99 % 17.2 deg Pluto orbital inclination = 98% of 17.4 degrees
o But
o Light (0.3 mkm/s) travels during 17 seconds a distance =5.1 mkm =5.1 deg
o 5.1 deg = The moon orbital inclination.
Equation No. (10)
23.36 deg = 29.2 deg x 0.8 deg
But 23.6 deg = 29.53 deg x 0.8 deg
- 23.4 deg = Earth Axial Tilt
- 23.6 deg = The Outer Planets Orbital Inclinations Total
- 29.2 deg= Earth motion degrees during 29.53 days (0.985 deg x29.53 d =29.2 deg)
- (29.2 deg +360 deg= 389.2 deg = the moon motion degrees during 29.53 days.)
- 0.8 degrees = Uranus orbital inclination
- The data shows Uranus data effect on Earth and the moon motions data
Equation No. (11)
Tan (23.4) x 95.6 = 41.4
- 23.4 deg = Earth Axial Tilt
- 95.6 deg = 90 deg + 5.6 deg (5.1 deg = the moon orb. Inclination + 0.5 deg = the
moon angular diameter means 5.6 deg = the moon orb. Inclination measured
above the moon diameter)
- 41.4 mkm = Venus Earth Distance
13. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
13
2-3 Venus & Uranus Cycles Analysis
I-Data
(a)
30589 days = 224.7 days x 135 (0.8%)
(b)
5832.5 h = 17.2 h x 680
(c)
(30589 x 2 days) / 243 days = (6939.75 days /27.3 days)
But
(243 days /224.7 days) = (29.53 days /27.3 days)
(d)
((2802 h x 2)/17.2 h) = 329.8 (error 1.2%)
But
30589 =327.6 x 93.37
(e)
(243 h x 2) /17.2 h = 28.3
II-Discussion
Equation no. (a)
30589 days = 224.7 days x 135 (0.8%)
- 30589 days = Uranus orbital period 224.7 days = Venus orbital period
- 135 mkm = the distance Earth moves in 1259.3 h (w have discussed before), from
the point 135 mkm to Uranus the distance =2737 mkm
- The equation tells, some proportionality is found between both orbtial periods
based on the distance 135 mkm.
14. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
14
Equation no. (b)
5832.5 h x 2 = 17.2 h x 680
- 5832.5 hours = Venus rotation period =243 days
- 17.2 hours = Uranus rotation period = Uranus day period
- 680 mkm = Venus Orbital Circumference (used here as a rate only)
- Equation (d) supports the same argument of Uranus effect on Venus creation and
motion data – But we still don't know by what mechanism this effect is found –
also by what force.
- Again the number (2) is used between both planets data, dos this mechanism
depends on this number (2)?! We still need to discover that…
Equation no. (c)
(30589 days x 2) / 243 days = (6939.75 days /27.3 days)
- 30589 days = Uranus orbital period
- 243 days = Venus rotation period
- 6939.75 days = Metonic Cycle
- 27.3 days = the moon orbital period
- Again the number (2) is used between both planets data,
- Equation no. (e) tells that, Uranus effect on Venus data has a relationship with
Metonic Cycle (this cycle of the moon continues for 19 years)
- There's an interesting discussion behind this data let's summarize it in following:
o I argue that, Uranus motion effect on the moon motion causes the moon to
rotate Metonic Cycle –
o The direct proof is that, Uranus orbital circumference =19 Earth orbital
circumference.
o So, if Uranus motion effect on the moon motion, the number 19 should be
seen in this effect because it’s the rate between the 2 orbits
15. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
15
o There are many other proves around this argument – we have discussed
before in other papers-
o The strong effect of Uranus on Venus data courage the conclusion that
Venus does some role in this effect to create Metonic Cycle
o Uranus still has its own force and can effect on the moon motion directly
without Venus effect by Uranus axial tilt (97.8 deg).
o That shows the equation idea, because Venus is partner in Metonic Cycle
Creation, for that, the period )(6939.75 days =19 years) is used with Venus
data – the next data supports this same argument
(243 days /224.7 days) = (29.53 days /27.3 days)
243 days Venus rotation period 224.7 days Venus orbital period
27.3 days the moon orbital period 29.53 days the moon day period
Notice
The number (19) controls almost all rates between Uranus and the moon data – let's
refer to them in following:
- Uranus orbital distance 2872.5 mkm =19 Earth orbital distance 149.6 mkm
- 97.8 deg (Uranus Axial Tilt) =19 x 5.15 (the moon orbital inclination =5.1 deg)
- 327.6 days = 19 x 17.2 days (Uranus day period =17.2 hour)
- 90.8 deg x 19 = 1725 degrees (The moon radius =1725 km)
(0.8 deg = Uranus orbital inclination and on vertical =0.8 +90 =90.8)
- 1.44 deg =1.8 deg (Neptune orbital inclination) x 0.8 deg (Uranus orbital inclination)
Where (1.44 degrees = the moon orbit regression per month).
16. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
16
Equation no. (d
((2802 h x 2)/17.2 h) = 329.8 (error 1.2%)
- 2802 hours = Venus day period
- 329.8 days = 327.6 days (lunar sidereal year) +2.23 days
- The period 329.8 days is a lunar sidereal year but doesn't finish with a sidereal
month (27.3 days) but with a synodic month (29.53 days)
- Again the number (2) is used,
- The equation supports the same argument
But
30589 days =327.6 days x 93.37
- 93.37 degrees = 90 deg +3.37 deg (3.4 deg = Venus orbital inclination)
- 30589 days = Uranus orbital period
- 327.6 days = the moon orbital period
- The data shows the moon orbital period depends on Uranus orbital period by using
Venus orbital inclination as a rate – still the data supports the same argument.
Equation no. (e)
(243 h x 2) /17.2 h = 28.3
- 243 days = Venus rotation period
- 17.2 hours = Uranus rotation period
- 28.3 deg = Neptune Axial Tilt
- The equation tells, one day of a planet motion is equivalent to one hour of another
planet motion – this idea we know before, because
o Pluto velocity (4.7 km/s) x 24 seconds = 112.2 km
o The 3 planets (Mercury + Venus + earth) velocities total =112.2 km/s
o That creates the rate (1 hour =1 day) but we still need to discover how this
rate works. The data supports this same meaning.
17. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
17
Notice (1)
o Light supposed velocity 1.16 mkm/s during (93.4 s) moves 108.3 mkm
(Venus orbital distance =108.2 mkm) where 93.4 degrees = 90 deg + 3.4 deg
(Venus orbital inclination)
o i.e. Venus orbital distance depends on Venus orbital inclination.
o Light supposed velocity 1.16 mkm/s during (97.8 s) moves 113.4 mkm
o 113.4 mkm= 113.4 degrees = 90 +23.4 degrees (Earth axial tilt).
Notice (2)
o (1/2.6 mkm) = 0.3846 mkm (the moon orbital distance =384000 km)
And
o (1/0.413 mkm) = 2.42 mkm but 2.42 mkm x 1.0725 = 2.5986 mkm = the
moon displacements total during 29.53 days
18. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
18
2-4 The General Discussion
- The paper discusses many interesting data, Some data be very strong and no way
to consider them as results of pure coincidences – let's remember some of them in
following
First
o 51118 km (Uranus diameter)/ 12104 km (Venus Diameter) = 4.22
o (Uranus Mass) / (Venus Mass) = (4.22)2
o How this data can be created by any pure coincidence of numbers – this is
created by a geometrical rule we don't discover yet. someone should try
Second
o Venus (35 km/s) moves during 12104 seconds a distance = 423640 km =
Uranus motion distance during Uranus day period (12104 km = Venus
Diameter)
o This is usual using in the solar system motions – How a planet orbital
circumference be used as period of time? We should find an answer.
Third
o 116.75 = 115 x (180/177.4)
o 177.4 deg = 98.6 deg x 1.8 deg
o This data is directed data,
o 115 = The Sun Diameter / Venus Diameter
o Uranus effects on the sun creation process by using Venus diameter.
o Uranus aimed to create 2 basic values of Venus Data, are (115 and 116.75)
o Uranus needed these 2 Values (115 and 116.75) in the sun creation process,
because of that, Uranus uses its data (98.6 deg =97.8 deg +0.8 deg) to create
Venus Axial Tilt 177.4 deg defining that (180/177.4) = 1.01465
o The next step, Uranus needs Venus diameter to be with the rate 115 in
comparison with the sun diameter by that (180/177.4) = (116.75/115)
19. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
19
o The sun creation process needs these 2 values (116.75 and 115)
Why? Because
o (1) The value 115 degrees = 90 deg +25 degrees (Mars axial tilt =25.2 deg)
o Also, Kepler 3rd
law (distance3
is proportional to Period2
) for the solar
planets motions use a constant =25
o Also, Saros shadows shift angle is 115 degrees
o That means, the value 115 (or 25) is a value used frequently in the solar
system geometry (Why?)
o We may conclude that, the solar system design depends on this rate (115) in
the sun creation process –
o (2) the sun creation process depends on different rate of time,
o 1 Day of the sun motion = 1 year of the Earth motion
o Without this rate of time the sun can't be created, because the planets
motions energies total during 1 year can be used by the sun in one day only
and by that the mechanical motions energies can be used to create the sun
rays
o The Sun supposed Rate of time is 1 day = 1 years
o Mean
o 1 day = 365.25 days
o But
o 365.25 days = π x 116.26 days
o Venus day period =116.75 days (error 0.4%).
20. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
20
Many other data are found by geometrical rules which are not discovered yet, as the
following data
(b)
o 5832.5 h = 17.2 h x 680
(c)
o (30589 x 2 days) / 243 days = (6939.75 days /27.3 days)
o But
o (243 days /224.7 days) = (29.53 days /27.3 days)
(d)
o ((2802 h x 2)/17.2 h) = 329.8
(error 1.2%)
o But
o 30589 =327.6 x 93.37
(e)
o (243 h x 2) /17.2 h = 28.3
o 243 days = Venus rotation period
o 17.2 hours = Uranus rotation period
o 28.3 deg = Neptune Axial Tilt
21. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
21
Venus Diameter proportionality with the moon orbital inclination
(I)
- (35 km/s) Venus velocity /(6.8 km/s) Uranus velocity = 5.14
- (24.1 km/s) Mars velocity /(4.7 km/s) Pluto velocity = 5.14
(II)
- 2390 km (Pluto Diameter) x 5.1 =12104 km (Venus Diameter)
o We remember, Venus moves during 12104 s a distance = 423640 km =
Uranus motion distance during its day period (17.2 h x 3600 s x 6.8)
o We ask Why?
o But
o Pluto (4.7km/s) moves during 10921s a distance = Uranus diameter
o Pluto (4.7km/s) moves during 51118 s a distance = 2 Saturn diameters
o Where
o 51118 km = Uranus diameter
o 120536 km = Saturn Diameter
I want to say
o Venus moves during (12104 s) a distance = Uranus motion distance during
its day period, because Venus diameter is created as function in Pluto
diameter by the rate (5.1) (where the rate of velocities between Venus and
Uranus =5.14)
o I try to show that, we deal with directed data, it’s created by geometrical
rules, but we don't know these rules because we don't know how the matter
is created
A Conclusion
Light Motion Creates Geometrical Effects On Matter And
Space Dimensions
22. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
22
References
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (II)
https://www.academia.edu/45181646/The_Moon_Orbital_Motion_Geometry_II_
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-moon-orbital-motion-geometry-ii
Light Motion Features Are Discovered in Planet Motion
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/light-motion-features-are-discovered-in-planet-motion
or
https://www.academia.edu/44286772/Light_Motion_Features_Are_Discovered_in_Planet_Motion
The Moon Motion Trajectory Analysis (II)
https://www.academia.edu/44368860/The_Moon_Motion_Trajectory_Analysis_II_
Does Particle Data Depend on Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
https://vixra.org/abs/1912.0134
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of
publications:
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-
local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous