6th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2016 Integrative Risk Management - Towards Resilient Cities. 28 August - 01 September 2016 in Davos, Switzerland
For example, may want to consider alterntative coastal flood protection schems – evaulating each for the savings in floods that do not happen. s
The tools of catastrophe modeling are starting to be used by cities planning their strategies of resilience . Tools are required because we never know which catastrophe is going to happen next, so we need to plan for a wide range of possibilities. In the city of the government there will be three separate classes of catastrophe model user, all wanting to access the saame underlying model but wanting to interogate that model in very different ways. First there is the chief resilience officer, like this one for Christchurch New Zealand. He or she will need to have identified a ciomplete audit of the buildingsand infrastucture of the city. Will want to know from the model where risk is concentrated – ris of causlaties, of economic loss, of damaged buildings range of metrics. Will want to explore the cost benefit of alternative interventions to see which will give the biggest reduction in risk.
So this is the agenda for cities and governments. First to create resiliant governance that focuses on the resilience agenda. This will be supported by all the resilience analytics powered by the engine of localized catastrophe loss modeling, from which it will be posisble to design the appropriate strategies f long term risk reduction, and then for risks that cannot be reduced – for innovative risk transfer – all under a world in which facets of the climate, from sea level rise to intense rainfall events and heatwaves are changing.