Presentation offering insight regarding CTC Global's high-capacity, high-efficiency ACCC conductor deployed to more than 430 projects in 40 countries to improve the efficiency, capacity and reliability of the electric power transmission grid while reducing line losses and associated CO2 and other GHG emissions
(RIYA) Kalyani Nagar Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
CTC Global ACCC conductor overview august 2016
1. ACCC® Conductor
Improving the Efficiency,
Capacity and Reliability of the Grid
Deployed to over 425 project sites in 40 countries by over 150 utilities
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
2. • Privately held Delaware Corporation
• Headquartered in Irvine, California
• R&D began in 2003
• Trial Lines Installed in 2004
• Commercially Deployed in 2005
• ISO Certified Production in 2006
• Stranding Partners Worldwide
• 38,000 km at over 425 project sites
CTC Global Corporation
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
3. ACCC
Its hybrid carbon fiber core is 70% lighter and 50% stronger than
steel. Its has a coefficient-of-thermal-expansion about 10 times
less than steel. This allows the use of 28% more aluminum which
helps increase capacity, improve efficiency & mitigate thermal sag.
High Performance Conductor for a Modern Grid
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
4. Greater Strength & Reduced Sag
Higher Ampacity Limits at Cooler Temperatures
Able to Tolerate N-1 Conditions
Increased Spans on Fewer / Shorter Structures
Proven Reliability with Reduced Line Losses
Selected as the Most Cost Effective Solution
High-Capacity, Low-Sag ACCC Offers:
The world’s most efficient conductor
10 years of Installation & Operating Experience
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
5. Carbon Fiber Widely Utilized
High Strength, Light Weight & Excellent Resistance to Cyclic Load Fatigue CTC Global ACCC Conductor
6. 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
CableSag(Inches)
Temperature (C)
ACCC
GAP
Invar
ACCR
ACSS
ACSR
How Does it Compare to Other Conductors?
Comparison testing performed by Hydro One on a 65 meter span, 1600 amps, Drake size
Cooler operating temperatures underscore improved efficiency and reduced losses
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
7. Example of sag differences in the field (UK)
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
8. 1. Developed & Tested the Composite Core
2. Tested Electrical Properties of the Conductor
3. Developed & Tested Ancillary Hardware
4. Assessed Environmental Exposure and Longevity
5. Evaluated Conventional Installation Procedures
6. Commercially Deployed in 2005
7. ISO Certified in 2006
The Substantial Path to ACCC® Deployment
In consultation with several International
Utilities and laboratories, CTC Global:
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
9. Core Testing:
2.1.1 Tensile Testing
2.1.2 Flexural, Bending & Shear Tests
2.1.3 Sustained Load Tests
2.1.4 Tg Tests
2.1.5 CTE Measurements
2.1.6 Shear Testing
2.1.7 Impact and Crush Testing
2.1.8 Torsion Testing
2.1.9 Notched Degradation Testing
2.1.10 Moisture Resistance Testing
2.1.11 Long Term Thermal Testing
2.1.12 Sustained Load Thermal Testing
2.1.13 Cyclic Thermal Testing
2.1.14 Specific Heat Capacity Testing
2.1.15 High Temperature Short Duration
2.1.16 High Temperature Core Testing
2.1.17 Thermal Oxidation Testing
2.1.18 Brittle Fracture Testing
2.1.19 UV Testing
2.1.20 Salt Fog Exposure Tests
2.1.21 Creep Tests
2.1.22 Stress Strain Testing
2.1.24 Micrographic Analysis
2.1.25 Dye Penetrant Testing
2.1.26 High Temperature Shear Testing
2.1.27 Low Temperature Shear Testing
Mechanical Conductor Testing:
2.2.28 Stress Strain Testing
2.2.29 Creep Testing
2.2.30 Aeolian Vibration Testing
2.2.31 Galloping Tests
2.2.32 Self Damping Tests
2.2.33 Radial Impact and Crush Tests
2.2.34 Turning Angle Tests
2.2.35 Torsion Tests
2.2.36 High Temperature Sag Tests
2.2.37 High Temperature Sustained Load
2.2.38 High Temperature Cyclic Load Tests
2.2.39 Cyclic Ice Load Tests
2.2.40 Sheave Wheel Tests
2.2.41 Ultimate Strength Tests
2.2.42 Cyclic Thermo-Mechanical Testing
2.2.43 Combined Cyclic Load Testing
2.2.44 Conductor Comparison Testing
Electrical Conductor Testing:
2.3.45 Resistivity Testing
2.3.46 Power Loss Comparison Testing
2.3.47 Ampacity
2.3.48 EMF Measurements
2.3.49 Impedance Comparison Testing
2.3.50 Corona Testing
2.3.51 Radio Noise Testing
2.3.52 Short Circuit Testing
2.3.53 Lightning Strike Testing
2.3.54 Ultra High Voltage AC & DC Testing
Systems & Hardware Testing:
2.4.55 Current Cycle Testing
2.4.56 Sustained Load Testing
2.4.57 Ultimate Assembly Strength Testing
2.4.58 Salt Fog Emersion Testing
2.4.60 Static Heat Tests
2.4.61 Suspension Clamp Testing
2.4.62 Thermo-Mechanical Testing
2.4.63 Cyclic Load Testing
Field Testing:
2.5.64 Ambient Temperature
2.5.65 Tension, Sag, and Clearance
2.5.66 Conductor Temperature
2.5.67 Electric Current
2.5.68 Wind Speed and Direction
2.5.69 Solar Radiation
2.5.70 Rainfall
2.5.71 Ice Buildup
2.5.72 Splice Resistance
2.5.73 Infrared Measurements
2.5.74 Corona Observations
2.5.75 Electric and Magnetic Fields
2.5.76 Wind and Ice Load Measurements
2.5.77 Vibration Monitoring
2.5.78 Typhoon Test
US / UK / France / Canada / Mexico / China / Brazil / Chile / Belgium / Indonesia / Germany
Testing & Validation
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
10. Torsion Testing
“After completing nearly one and a half
revolutions per foot, my lab guys got
tired of trying to break it so they gave
up.” Craig Pon, Kinectrics
4 Revolutions
54 Revolutions
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
11. Bending Tests
Conductor bent 90 degrees
10 times around a 6 inch
radius. No visual damage to
core was noted.
Dye penetrant did appear
after 2 minutes in the outer
glass strands showing some
degradation.
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
12. Thermal Oxidation Tests
Core sample cooked at 220OC for one year
Oxidation limited to ~60 microns in depth CTC Global ACCC Conductor
13. Longevity Assessment by Alpha Star
Primary Contractor to Boeing, Airbus and NASA
Substantial Empirical Test Data
provided the basis for
high-level & very accurate
computer modeling
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
14. Substantial Experience 38,000 km at 425 project sites
Over 45,000 Dead-Ends & Splices in service
Countries:
• USA
• China
• France
• UK
• Poland
• Spain
• Scotland
• Portugal
• Mexico
• Chile
• Qatar
• Indonesia
• Belgium
• Brazil
• Germany
• South Africa
• South Korea
• Russia
• Costa Rica
• India
• Columbia
• Congo
• Ireland
• Mozambique
• Netherlands
• Nigeria
• Vietnam
• Australia
• Malaysia
• Croatia
• Kazakhstan
• Panama
• Estonia
• Laos
• Serbia
• New Zealand
• Paraguay
• Bangladesh*
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
15. Utah, USA
Reconductor Project
Project Name: PacifiCorp 90 South to Oquirrh, Utah
Project Goal: Increase Ampacity (use existing structures)
Conductor Size: Drake
Conductor Length: 30 km
Voltage: 138 kV
Energized: 2005
Over 100 existing structures saved
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
16. Kansas, USA
New Line
Project Name: Kingman to Cunningham, Kansas
Project Goal: Install New Line
Conductor Size: Hawk
Conductor Length: 108 km
Voltage: 34.5 kV
Energized: 2006
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
17. Nevada, USA
Heavy Ice Application
Project Name: NV Energy Line 107 (Reno to Carson City)
Project Goal: Increase Ampacity (existing structures)
Conductor Size: Linnet
Conductor Length: 90 km
Voltage: 120 kV
Energized: 2009
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
18. Mexico Bay
Corrosive Marine Environment
Project Name: CFE Carmen to Noreste
Goal: Increase ampacity reduce line sag, avoid corrosion
Conductor Size: Hawk
Conductor Length: 32 km
Voltage: 230 kV
Energized: 2009
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
19. Chile
Long Span Application
Project Name: Chilectra El Salto to Torre 8 Line
Project Goal: Increase Ampacity – (existing structures)
Conductor Size: Linnet
Conductor Length: 28 km
Voltage: 110 kV
Energized: 2009
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
20. Spain
Wind Farm Link
Project Name: NEO Energia 80 turbine upgrade
Project Goal / Type: Increase Ampacity (existing structures)
Conductor Size: Amsterdam
Conductor Length: 57 km
Voltage: 66 kV
Energized: 2008
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
21. Germany
Extra High Voltage Application
Project Name: Amprion Gmbh
Project Goal / Type: Trial Line
Conductor Size: Oslo (bundled)
Length: 8.6 km
Voltage: 400 kV
Energized: 2009
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
22. Nevada, USA
Extreme Wind Survival
Project Name: NV Energy Line 107 (Reno to Carson City)
Project Goal: Increase Ampacity (existing structures)
Conductor Size: Linnet
Conductor Length: 90 km
Voltage: 120 kV
Energized: 2009
100+ mph Winds: 2010 Conductor Undamaged
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
23. Nevada, USA
Fire Storm Survival
Project Name: NV Energy Line 107 (Reno to Carson City)
Project Goal: Increase Ampacity (existing structures)
Conductor Size: Linnet
Conductor Length: 90 km
Voltage: 120 kV
Energized: 2009
Firestorm: 2012 – ACCC CONDUCTOR UNDAMAGED
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
24. Portugal
River Crossing
Project Name: River Mondego
Project Goal: Increase Amps - Reduce Sag
Conductor Size: Amsterdam
Span Length: 475 Meters
Voltage: 60 kV
Energized: 2012
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
29. 1. Pulling sleeve “sock” swivels broke causing conductor to drop (US, Poland,
Columbia) Inspect/test older equipment prior to use
2. Installation grips slipped causing birdcage (Vietnam, US, Russia)
Use correct size grip
3. Conductor damaged at dead-end interface (US, China)
Do not kick dead-end out of compression die, use soap to lubricate dies
4. Conductor damaged at installation grip (Indonesia)
Control loose end while installing dead-end, don’t drop assembly which could cause
excessive bending at Chicago grip
5. Core damaged while being bent around very small reel alignment pulleys (US,
Poland)
Use hydraulic reel brakes to control back tension
Use mid-span sheave wheel to avoid sharp bending when necessary
Installation Events & Corrective Actions
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
33. Installation Training and Support
Check out our installation Training Videos on YouTubeCTC Global ACCC Conductor
34. A few of CTC’s International Customers:
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
35. Why Did These Utilities Choose ACCC?
Because, after discovering its technical
merits and evaluating its durability, it
provided the most economical solution
for their specific projects
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
36. The Value of Line Loss Reduction
Reduced line losses saves money… every year
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
37. The Value of Generation Capacity Savings
Reduced line losses reduces generation capacity investment
It is much less expensive to save energy than it is to produce it
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
38. The Value of Emission Reduction
Reduced line losses reduces fuel consumption
…and associated emissions
Average car in US = 4.7 mt CO2 / scenario 1 = 13,513 cars / scenario 2 = 53,313 cars
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
39. 345 kV Line – Replace ACSR with ACCC
• Increased line capacity by 75% with 625 amp emergency reserve
• Reduced line losses by 30%
• Line loss reduction saves 141,580 MWh / year (=$7.1M @ $50/MWh)
• Emission reductions saves 83,316 Metric Tons CO2 / year
• This equates to removing over 17,500 cars from the road
• Line loss reduction also frees up over 17 MW of generation ($17 M+)
Notes:
Double bundled Drake conductor. Load factor Assumption = 34%
Texas State Average CO2 = 1.297# / kWh. (1 car = 4.75 MT CO2 / year)
Cost of wire ~ $15.4M
Assuming installation cost of $18.6 M – total project cost $34 Million
Equals ~$285,000 per circuit mile (WECC Estimate basis)
120 Circuit Mile AEP Project Example
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
40. • Over 60 standard conductor sizes
• New ULS conductors for extreme spans
• Design & Engineering Support
• 24/7 Customer Service
• Installation Training & Support
• Extensive Engineering Database
GLOBAL Support
CTC Global ACCC Conductor
44. ACCC® Conductor
Improving the Efficiency, Capacity,
Reliability & Resilience of the Grid
CTC Global
2026 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, California 92614 USA
+1 (949) 428-8500 www.ctcglobal.com
CTC Global ACCC Conductor