![Rational: Collaborative Learning ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (14)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to CMC Teacher Education SIG Presentation; Mitchell
Similar to CMC Teacher Education SIG Presentation; Mitchell (20)
More from CmcTchrEdSIG
More from CmcTchrEdSIG (10)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
CMC Teacher Education SIG Presentation; Mitchell
- 1. Student and Teacher Roles in Collaborative Writing By Kathleen Mitchell, M.A.
- 7. Wiki Assignment Teacher-Guided
- 12. Analysis- Types of Revisions Faigley & Witte, 1981
Editor's Notes
- The Common European Frame of Reference for Languages
- The essays were graded using a rubric to assess: Language & Style Good range of vocabulary and grammar Clear and concise Only a few errors Organization Well written thesis Organization is clear Good topic and concluding sentences Logically presented details Correct MLA and formatting Content Very focused Very clear main idea Very interesting Well supported Answers the prompt well
- The essays were graded using a rubric to assess: Language & Style Good range of vocabulary and grammar Clear and concise Only a few errors Organization Well written thesis Organization is clear Good topic and concluding sentences Logically presented details Correct MLA and formatting Content Very focused Very clear main idea Very interesting Well supported Answers the prompt well
- used in Arnold et al. 2009
- 4 groups had more stylistic than formal changes
- 4 groups had more stylistic than formal changes
- 41% were unsure if it improved their writing overall Content, style, 25% unsure Language 37% unsure
- There were 2 questions about the roles did it help everyone contribute equally and did it make collaboration harder/ 25% Thought the roles made it harder 25% were unsure. For the = participation, people either agreed or disagreed.
- used in Arnold et al. 2009
- used in Arnold et al. 2009 she calls these stylistic changes . including paraphrases, deletions that require the reading to make inferences, additions that make things more explicit, substitute words of equal meaning, rearrange phrases without changing the meaning, length or shorten ideas Substitution was often for a better word get -> become
- used in Arnold et al. 2009 she calls these stylistic changes . including paraphrases, deletions that require the reading to make inferences, additions that make things more explicit, substitute words of equal meaning, rearrange phrases without changing the meaning, length or shorten ideas Substitution was often for a better word get -> become