Punishment Essay

Punishment Essay
There are many explanations for what punishment characterises. For Emile Durkheim, punishment was mainly an expression of social solidarity and
not a form of crime control. Here, the offender attacks the social moral order by committing a crime and therefore, has to be punished, to show that this
moral order still "works". Durkheim's theory suggests that punishment must be visible to everyone, and so expresses the outrage of all
members of society against the challenge to their collective values. The form of punishment changes between mechanic (torture, execution) and organic
(prison) solidarity because the values of society change but the idea behind punishing, the essence, stays the same – keeping the moral order intact not
...show more content...
Therefore, these social rules, customs and traditions all form a culture, which gives different societies their unique characteristic.
In relation to punishment, Durkheim's approach considers the importance of punishment for this social solidarity. Durkheim 's theory of punishment
is a part of a bigger theory based on law, in The Division of Labour in Society (1960) which then developed into 'Two Laws of Penal Evolution' (1984)
In The Division of Labour in Society, Durkheim analyses the differences between modern industrial society and forms of society which went before it,
and his main concern is to locate the sources and type of social solidarity – the common feelings customs and traditions that make people recognise
themselves as part of the same society – in the modern industrial state. In Durkheim's view, a pre–industrial society consists of individuals carrying out
the same tasks, or shared life experiences, with the exception of a few i.e. priests and rulers). There will therefore be solidarity based on similarity in
shared beliefs, understandings and tradition. (Hudson, 1996,P2) This, as Durkheim calls it, is mechanic solidarity, where the shared rules and customs
will function to keep society alive and up and running.
In comparison, if and when the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Marxist Theory on Crime and Punishment Essays
K1
Danielle K
Marxist Theory and Crime and Punishment Throughout human history countless philosophers have risen with what they thought to be the best form
of government for society as a whole. Karl Marx may be the most influential philosopher in Russian history. According to The Free Dictionary,Marxism
is the concept that "class struggle plays a central role in understanding society's allegedly inevitable development from bourgeois oppression under
capitalism to a socialist and ultimately classless society". With this theory, Marx had a great impact on Russian literatureНѕ specifically, Fyodor
Dostoyevsky's Crime and Punishment. According the the Marxist theory, one would interpret Crime and Punishment as a perfect example to...show
more content...
As stated that the definition of Marxism, it says that one goes from a capitalist government, to a socialist government, and ultimately a classless society
with communism. Here, this novel stands to be a perfect example of a rise to communism, and the rise of a proletariat. With this, a Marxist theory
would begin to see Raskolnikov as a version of the proletariat, or common man, in charge of a violent overthrow. It is believed by Marxist theorists
that the proletariat goes through various stages of development. In the beginning they struggle against the bourgeois, then this metamorphosizes itself
into suffering, and the finally through the growth of the masses, victory arises for the common man. The goal of the Marxist man is to violently
overthrow capitalism. Even though Raskolnikov does not conduct a violent overthrow of the government, he comes together in the same way, by
violently killing what he sees as a leach on society. Raskolnikov battles his emotions and morality because of the murder of the pawnbroker and
therefore suffers because of it. Though Porfiry and Sonia partake in him finding his salvation, it is ultimately Raskolnikov himself that realizes that by
accepting his sins he overcomes his emotions and finds redemption. When "suddenly it was as if something lifted him and flung him down at her feet.
He wept and embraced her knees",

Essay on The History of Punishment
Punishment is a brutal, severe feeling that has been around for centuries. Since the oldest civilizations till Today punishment has impact the world and
how people live their life. Throughout generation to generation civilizations, countries have grown in crimes and punishment. Ancient punishments
were harsher than Today's punishments. In Middle ages, Ancient Greece and Rome, Mesopotamia they'd cruel punishments that were more harsher,
severe than Today's. In the oldest civilizations people were inhumane. They'd committed the most brutal punishments. Today, we have jails and a faster
way to die without pain. Before any jails, or guns people we chopped, cut into pieces, burned to death or boiled. They also were tortured to death in the
This code had about three hundred laws that discuss a range of subjects. Like divorce, adoption, homicide, assault, and other more. The Code of
Hammurabi applied to three classes: amely, musking and ardu. The most significant law or rule of the Hammurabi's code was "an eye for an eye."
The legal language, name is Lex Talionis. Lex Talionis ("eye for an eye") covered many crimes such as bearing false witness. If a person falsely
accused another person, the accuser would be punished instead. The Code of Hammurabi influenced legal system throughout Persia and the East for
several centuries.
Egypt developed a system of law that view right and wrong. The Egyptian justice belief was Maat. By the Maat, the pharaohs who authorize the
punishments were expected to view everyone equal, except slaves. The pharaoh was who decided the most serious cases. They'd considered tomb
robbery one of the most extremely wicked crimes but, this crime became so rampant that during the rule of Ramses IX they began robbing the
pharaohs. Egyptian had variety of punishment such as beating, cutting ears, nose and hands. If a women was caught cheating she had her nose cut off.
Women often suffered more severe punishments than men. If a men was caught cheating he had received a beating as punishment. Based on the
harshness of much punishment Egypt made some concepts of basic human rights. If a pregnant woman received the death penalty, she was not
sanctioned

Against The Death Penalty Essay
Against the Death Penalty "Murder is wrong" ("Capital Punishment"). We've been taught this indisputable truth since childhood. The death penalty is
defined as one human taking the life of another. Coincidentally, that is a classification of murder. There are as many as thirty
–six states with the death
penalty, and it's essential that they change it. The United States needs the death penalty abolished because it is filled with flaws, cruel and immoral,
and is an ineffective means of deterrent for crime. I understand why you would want to have the death penalty in effect. You probably think that it will
be cheaper to execute people instead of paying taxes for them in jail. There is also a probability that you think that you will...show more content...
Another flaw is it is morally wrong. No matter how people sugar–coat it, murder is murder, in the name of justice or in vengeance it is morally wrong.
Everyone deserves to live, no matter their circumstances are. Federal states should not be allowed to decide who lives and who dies, especially in a
country such as the United States, which prides its self on freedom ("Top Ten"). Moreover, the death penalty is applied at random ("Facts"). "The
death penalty is a lethal lottery: of the 15,000 to 17,000 homicides committed every year in the United States, approximately 120 people are sentenced
to death, less than 1%" ("Facts"). Many criminals have committed the same crimes, but few have been sentenced to death for their crimes. In Addition,
there is a chance mentally ill citizens could be convicted to death ("Facts"). According to Amnesty International and the National Association on Mental
Illness, One out of every ten persons who has been executed in the United States since 1977 is mentally ill. "Many mentally ill defendants are unable
to participate in their trials in any meaningful way and appear unengaged, cold, and unfeeling before the jury" ("Facts"). Many mentally ill defendants
have been drugged against their will in order for them to be competent enough to be executed ("Facts"). Some states still haven't put a ban on executing
mentally ill people such as Organ, although the United States Supreme Court has declared that

Pro Death Penalty Essay
Capital punishment and the practice of the death penalty is an issue that is passionately debated in the United States. Opponents of the death penalty
claim that capital punishment is unnecessary since a life sentence accomplishes the same objective. What death penalty opponents neglect to tell you
is that convicted murders and child rapists escape from prison every year(List of prison escapes, 2015). As I write this essay, police are searching for
two convicted murders who escaped from the Clinton Correctional Facility in Dannemora, New York on June 6th, 2015. The ONLY punishment from
which one cannot escape is the death penalty.
Opponents of the death penalty believe capital punishment is unnecessary and inappropriate in our modern...show more content...
A fifth rationale in opposition is that the death penalty is too expensive or too costly to taxpayers to justify its use. According to those who oppose
the death penalty and certain studies, it costs more to execute a person than to keep him or her in prison for life (Death Penalty Focus, 2015). Finally,
it is believed by some that the killing at the hands of the state is not a righteous act but instead is on the same moral level as the murderers themselves.
According to capital punishment supporters, many of these reasons of the anti–death penalty movement are false and are now wrongly accepted as fact.
The argument that the death penalty does not deter crime is debatable. By executing murderers you prevent them from murdering again. If these people
no longer exist then they obviously cannot commit more crimes. In addition, criminals have admitted, in thousands of fully documented cases, that the
death penalty was the specific threat which deterred them from committing murder (Pro–Death Penalty, 2014). The opponents of capital punishment
claim that the death penalty has caused and can cause the execution of innocent people. However, according to the supporters, no evidence indicates
that innocent people have been executed. Upon reviewing 23 years of capital sentences, a Wall Street Journal study indicated that they were unable to
find a single case in which an innocent person was executed (Eddlem, 2002). Furthermore, advocates note that the

The Purposes of Punishment
The purposes of punishment.
What are the purposes of punishment? Which do you consider to be the most important and why?
Student: ***********
Student number: *******
Tutor name: *************
Hand–in date: 21st of November 2011
To begin with, it is necessary to say that punishment is an integral part of modern countries' legal systems, because countries have a duty to protect
society from wrongdoers and authorities could reach success in it by punishing offenders. Oxford English Dictionary defines punishment as the
infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution for an offence. There are four main purposes of punishment – incapacitation, deterrence, retribution
and rehabilitation – and the aim of this paper is to...show more content...
Deterrence is a further purpose that needs to be highlighted. The aim of punishment is also to warn people from crime committing under the fear of
being punished and it might be reached through the well–developed criminal justice system, one of the main aim of which is to ensure that every
wrongdoer will be punished for the criminal acts. There are two kinds of deterrence. They are general and specific deterrence. Ferris defines specific
deterrence as deterrence which attempts to persuade the individual before the court not to commit further offences, while general deterrence is
defined as the process of persuading others who might be inclined to offend not to do so. Deterrence has its own pros and cons as well. One of the
main deterrence benefits is that it may reduce crime rate significantly and sharply. For instance, there is a three strikes policy in most states of USA,
which means that if an individual has already been in jail two times and if this person commits a third crime, she would be automatically sentenced for
25 years regardless of crime seriousness. On the other hand, the main drawback is that criminals usually think that they will not be caught, so they
continue committing crimes.
Retribution, as the next aim of punishment, is associated with the idea that the wrongdoers have to be penalized and punished for violation against the
civilians. Retribution could be viewed from two aspects: revenge and restoration. According to Oxford English

The Punishment Of Prison System
In principle, prison system plays important role in the society through reforming and punishing offenders sent to prison and preventing potential
offenders. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of in prisoners in the US prisons system, because prison is used as the
primary correction facility for offenders while ensuring justice to offended (Guerino 20). Prisons comprise of offenders who are above the county jail
level. Further, inmates comprise of people from different background. That is; differentrace, education levels, nationality, and religion (Wilkinson
1099). Essentially, prison system is designed to maintain law and order in the society. Mainly, correction faculties are equipped with educational,
training programs and counseling to reform convicted offenders. This essay seeks to assess the responsibility of the prison system to offenders as well
as to the citizenry.
Initially, prisons were designed as penitent– punitive in nature. This approach aims at issuing punishment to offenders or seeks retribution from those
who are involved in serious crime. It involved incarceration and flogging offenders as a way of suppressing unwanted behavior (Morris and Tonry 79).
This is meant to reform minds of the offender through inflicting punishment and scare potential criminals from committing crime. However, this
approach may fail to achieve its objective if it is implemented without combing with other programs to reform the minds of the

Crime And Punishment By Dostoyevsky
Crime and Punishment, a novel written by Dostoyevsky which takes place in St. Petersburg, Russia during the years 1856 through 1866, a
psychological drama, was full of twists and turns that keeps a reader locked in. It takes you through many different emotions along with the characters
it mostly focused on; Raskolnikov, the main character, had decided tomurder a woman he had pawned things to before, and in doing so he also
ended up murdering her sister. Eventually he confesses to the murders and serves his time out in Siberia. There were many characters in this story
that, without them, it would not be the same. One of those characters is Razumihin, who in the story was very caring, protective, and reliable.
Razumihin was very caring towards Raskolnikov, especially when he had gotten sick. When Raskolmikov decided to give Razumihin a visit,
Raskolmikov started to act uncivilized and just left. Razumihin took a few days to figure out where Raskolnikov had lived, and spent days there
watching over him when he had a fever and was very delusional. "When you left my place in that uncivilized way without giving me your address...
So that very day I started. Well I walked around and walked around, asked here, asked there." (Dostoyevsky 117) Razumikhin was very concerned
When Razumihin was talking to Porfiry about Raskolnikov, he seemed really interested in meeting him, "Here's my friend Rodion Romanych
Raskolnikov . First you've heard of him, and you said you wanted to meet him." (Dostoyevsky 240). After they met, Raskolnikov figured out what
they were doing and decided to leave and Razumihin had caught on also. Razumihin had gotten angry they were treating his friend like that, "How
dare they! Where, where does is all come from? Only if you knew how mad I was." (Dostoyevsky 258). He couldn't believe that they were trying to
pin that crime on

Crime and Punishment Essay
Crime at its simplest is an act prohibited by law upon pain of punishment (Hall–Williams 1964). Theorists such as McCabe (1983:49) stated that no
word in legal and criminological terms could define the word crime for the varying content in which an act is categorised. Due to the broad spectrum
surrounding crime, differing understandings about human subjects and premises lead to the development of several theories, assumptions and forms of
criminal law.
Michael and Adler (1933:2) are often cited as an example of the legal description of crime: "the most precise and least ambiguous definition of crime
is that which defines it as behaviour which is often prohibited by the criminal code". The extending of the definition of crime is heavily...show more
content...
On the other hand, Paul Tappan is another example of defining 'crime'. With a background as a sociologist and a lawyer he's approach seperates
crime in the defintion of a sociologist and as a lawyer. Tappan (1947) accepts that all sorts of 'conduct norms' and their violations were legitimately
able to be studied by sociologists while, criminal law provides a precise type of these conduct norms to be considered a crime where "Crime is an
intentional act in violation of the cirminal law commited without defense or excuse and penalized by the state as a felony or misdemeanor" (Tappan
1947:100). Due to his understanding of crime being reinforced through his background in both law and sociology, he's view on defining crime originates
from differing perspectives. If crime was viewed as Tappan,criminology would be the study of violations of criminal law; it is limited to be defined by
the state, while disicplines such as sociology could be seen on a broader scale with a range of rules and violations of crime.
Sociologists began to question the defintion of crime and many more took up the challenge of defining it in hopes of extending the concept of crime to
cover various kinds of misbehaviour not presently covered by the criminal law system. In 1970, Herman

Crime And Effective Punishment Essay
Crime and Effective Punishment
"Stone walls do not a prison make, / [N]or iron bars a cage."–Richard Lovelace (Quiller)
As time flows, and calendar pages flip, the world evolves and changes. With time, crime changes. With the change of crime, punishments should change
as well. The twenty–first century has seen the birth of mass multimedia in which our every action and interaction is seen by all; it has made all the
world a stage. Today's world stage has created image conscientious actors who base their entire self–esteem off of the comments of their peers. Despite
the large public spotlight that can be instantly brought glaringly down upon these actors, they still commit crimes and say things they shouldn't, for
even they cannot defeat the ineffable dark aspects of human nature. For media mongers, the worst punishment is not a stint in jail or wergild to pay, but
rather it is being embarrassed in front of their peers. So although, many people believe public shaming to be a cruel and unusual punishment, it is
actually a very effective way to reprimand a person in today's image conscious world stage. Far back in the mythical times (before the advent of social
networking and the constant updates that flood from our phones into our clogged informational neurons) public shaming was being used as an
effective punishment (Stade). This is Nathaniel Hawthorne's topic of choice in his book the Scarlet Letter. Hawthorne's main character, an adulteress,
placed in the town square after

Punishment has been in existence since the early colonial period and has continued throughout history as a method used to deter criminals from
committing criminal acts. Philosophers believe that punishment is a necessity in today's modern society as it is a worldwide response to crime and
violence. Friedrich Nietzche's book "Punishment and Rehabilitation" reiterates that "punishment makes us into who we are; it creates in us a sense of
responsibility and the ability to take and release our social obligations" (Blue, Naden, 2001). Immanuel Kant believes that if an individual commits a
crime then punishment should be inflicted upon that individual for the crime committed. Cesare Beccaria, also believes that if there is a breach of the
It is through this that philosophers, government and prison officials have arrived at the five traditional goals of punishment which replicates elements of
criminal punishment. They are retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence, restoration and incapacitation. Retribution, rehabilitation and deterrence are
however the three most frequently used in today's modern society, as they are the main justifications for punishment.
Retribution
The retribution punishment theory is associated with the philosopher Immanuel Kant from as far back as the eighteenth century known as the "justice
model". The concept of retributive punishment is "just deserts," used as a means of getting even with the offender, allowing the victim to feel a sense
of justification by imposing the same measure of pain to the offender according to the crime committed; this will allow the victim to feel a sense of
satisfaction. Though retribution is not a law of retaliation, the Mosaic laws of the Bible idealized it as "an eye for an eye" phenomenon.
The objective is that, the intensity of the punishment should fit the seriousness of the crime. This act of punishment is usually enforced by a
sentencing judge whether in the form of a fine, probation or incarceration. One such example is, if an individual is caught stealing a bar

The History of Capital Punishment Essay
The History of Capital Punishment
Crime has been a plague on society from ancient times to present. In response to this plague, society has formed structured rules to deal with the
perpetrators of crime. A crime can be defined as act that society's government deems as illegal. Different societies have formed various methods and
standards for evaluating crime and assigning corresponding punishment. What constitutes a crime has changed throughout the course of history. In
ancient times, such extreme actions as the deliberate killing of another human being for the sake of family honor or religious rite was considered
socially acceptable and therefore not legally wrong. Now, the majority of the modern world (with perhaps the...show more content...
American concepts pertaining to offenders, punishment, and reform was developed after much careful thought and consideration concerning the
example of
English law and its history. Death was formerly the penalty for all felonies in English law. In practice, the death penalty was rarely applied as
widely as the law provided. A variety of procedures were adopted to mitigate the harshness of the law; therefore, many offenders who committed
capital crimes were pardoned. The conditions for pardon were the offender agreed to be transported to what were then the American colonies and
the benefit of the title of clergy. The benefit of clergy applied to offenders who were ordained priests (or clerks in Holy Orders) and who were
thereby subject to trial by the church courts rather than by the secular courts. Hence, if an offender could show that he was ordained he was allowed
to go free, and was subject to the possibility of punishment by the ecclesiastical courts. In the 17th century, the only proof of ordination was literacy,
and it became customary to allow anyone convicted of a felony to escape the death sentence by giving proof of literacy by reading a verse from Psalm
51. The obvious problem with this test is that most offenders escaped punishment by simply learning the words by heart.
Capital punishment has been used in the United States since Colonial times.
During this time frame, it was accepted because of

Essay on Capital Punishment
Capital Punishment
The definition of capital punishment is the legal punishment of death for violating criminal law. The person who gets capital punishment is the ones
who committed serious crimes. Methods of capital punishment throughout the world are by stoning, beheading, hanging, electrocution, lethal injection
and shooting. The two most common methods capital punishment use in the United States are lethal injection and electrocution.
The lethal injection is the most used form of capital punishment. It's an intravenous shot that kills the criminal quick and painless. When capital
punishment is done by electrocution the criminal is strapped to a chair that a volts of electricity is pass through.
In America if all people agree...show more content...
The first pros of capital punishment are that it works as deterrence against major crimes. The death penalty is a punishment that creates fear in the mind
of any sane person. Most criminals would think twice if they knew their own lives were at stake. Although there is no statistical evidence that death
penalty deters crime, we have to agree that most of us fear death.
The most conclusive evidence that criminals fear the death penalty more than life without parole is provided by convicted capital murderers and their
attorneys. 99.9% of all convicted capital murderers and their attorneys argue for life, not death, in the punishment phase of their trial. (prodeathpenalty)
A Second pro is that a criminal that is executed can't another crime or escape. A dead criminal can no longer commit a crime, and therefore the danger
to the public is permanently removed.
A third pro of capital punishment is that it's more economical. Why should money be spent on a criminal when it could be spent on education, the
sick, or the needy? The only reason why it is so expensive to execute an individual, is because of the numerous appeal processes. (~ab2166)
Another pro is that the retribution to the family and loves ones of the victims is payed. Endless stress and anxiety plague the families of the victims
and executions puts all those stresses to rest better than life–long imprisonment or

Criminal Justice Crime And Punishment Essay
Most countries have had several problems regarding their criminal justice systems. The Government institutions that are mandated to mitigate crimes,
uphold social control, and sanction law violators have proved to be ineffective in performing their decree. The study of justice, crime and punishment
is important as it creates awareness in the society on the legal aspects surrounding their actions. The study informs the people on grounds on which
they can be held liable of an offence and when and how they can seek intervention of law enforcement agencies in pursuit of justice. Besides, the study
justifies the purpose of punishment by using theoretical explanations as to why punishment is forwarded to offenders. Punishment in the context of
justice...show more content...
The means, by which perpetrators are handled, therefore, is tailored in a way that takes care of the welfare of people. For instance, imprisonment
ensures that those people who are capable of committing crimes and therefore disrupt the state of happiness meets the objective of utilitarianism.
Similarly, for organized, serious and gang–related crimes, utilitarian punishment is considered successful when it deters occurrence of crimes.
Punishment is also expected to enhance deterrence by increasing the certainty of punishment. By this, probable offenders are dissuaded by the risk of
fear. The degree of severity also prevents prospective offenders from weighing the consequences and therefore opting out of scheming crimes, they
would not dare consequences that are too

Crime and Punishment Essay examples
Crime and Punishment
Crime for what, and punishment for whom? May happens in a park and maybe in a room! Maybe at night or afternoon, here or there or close to the
moon. A man who makes a crime may be a tycoon or maybe just a vagrant without a small home. Now the problem is for what, for whom do a little
vagrant or a tycoon want to be a prisoner or a dark moon?
Making crimes comes as a result of many various things in life. The first and the greatest one is called money as the old expression that says "Money
is the root of all evil", As many people who are in need of money makes different types of crimes just to gain that money, however it's coming through
a wrong way. The second one and the most popular in Egypt is revenge by...show more content...
They have also made many aggressive things to get what they need and to make what they want. During this age, countries were internally corrupted
because they were busy externally as a result of the first and the second world wars.
So, during industrial revolution, corruption led to the appearance of plenty types of modern crimes.
The 20th century also has many and various types of crimes. Some of them are old and well known for the police inspectors and the others are
modern and its first appearance is in this age. However, there crimes exist in this age, It's not as much as in the past due to the presence of the
modern police systems that are able to decrease the average crimes happening in successive years. I guess that the 20th century is full of joy and
happiness as a result of decreasing the number of crimes since the governmental care is better than old ages.
Non of the humans was born as a criminal. A criminal is the end product of bad conditions that turn a heart of a baby or a child full of happiness into
a dark heart full of sadness. A calm person could turn to aggressive one because of those conditions that affect each and every person living on this
earth. Some countries try nowadays to change those conditions surrounding especially poor and homeless people. So, conditions are the main
responsible for making such a criminal.
Justice is a small word, but it has a great meaning as it play an important rule in crime and punishment. A judge

Persuasive Essay On Criminal Punishment
"Punishment is not for revenge, but to lessen crime and reform the criminal."– Elizabeth Fry
Crime is everywhere. Every country in the world has thousands of criminals who commit crimes daily and it affects every person in society in a
negative way. Eliminating crime is our duty here in Canada and we should be punishing the trouble makers of our communities. It's vital that we
convict the right criminal so that we can reward the proper and just punishment. Some criminals commit crimes because of rational choice theory
(convent for the criminal), strain theory (society strains them from obtaining what they need) or social control theory (society promoting certain
criminal behaviors). (Infographic: Varying Theories onCrime, 2017). The death penalty should be brought back into the Canadian Criminal Code and
become legal again. By making it legal it will reduce crime, will force higher level forensics when studying cases, and will challenge the truth of the
Canadian charter of rights and Freedoms. Punishments are there to teach lessons to the criminal and the society so that the same action will not be
completed.
The specific reason why crime is committed is unidentified, but criminals should be punished for their wrongful acts weather that is prison or the
death penalty, depending on the severity of the crime. Countries in the world like China until 2010, used execution and the death penalty to banish
their criminals from society. The Chinese society built a community that relies on the citizens and the government to be honest and lawful members of
society so that no crimes can be committed. From murder to obtaining narcotics, any criminal activity was sentenced to the firing squad in China. The
crime rate in China was very low because people didn't do anything that could be sentenced as wrong because of fear of dying. New York Times states
that "China's Legal System, reported last week that the national crime rate fell in the past two months to its lowest level in years, following the
increased use of tougher penalties including the death sentence. According to the report, recorded crimes dropped 46.7 percent" (Christopher Wren,
1983) Here in Canada, the Canadian government believes that it is right putting a

Punishment In The Criminal Justice System
Over the years, America has used punishment to deal with non–law abiding citizens. Punishment can be defined as the infliction of a consequence to an
offense. In this essay I will talk about what is punishment, the different forms of legal punishment, and the effeteness and my opinion about them. One
of the most talked about topics in criminal justice is how to deal with criminals? In today's world we just punish the person and not try to find out the
reason for the crime. In the criminal justice system we punish offenders in hopes of deterring them and society from ever recommitting the crime again.
One of the most common ways we try to deter crime is by incarceration, asset forfeiture, fines, probation/parole, death penalty, etc.... Incarceration
The movie theater shooting that occurred during the premier of the Batman movie horrified many people and the Sandy Hook Elementary School
shooting caused cries, and left people wonder why and who would do these things. Crimes like these force America to ask what should we do with
these people and how can we prevent such disasters? After those terrible disasters the nation talk was about creating more gun laws but that will
be difficult because of our right to bear arms. But the real question is how do we punish people who commit these crimes? The common way is to
just throw them in jail or sentence them to death but is that really working? I was punish a lot as a child for doing the wrong things and rewarded
for my good behavior. I learned that my actions were wrong through punishment but not just in childhood; we learn that in the workforce also by
being suspended or being fired for misconduct. So, It punishment is working for kids and in the workforce, why not the criminal justice system?
We punish people for their behavior physically or psychologically and because of that people tend to avoid that. Who wants to be beaten or have
their cell phone taken away for the fun of it right? Shouldn't prison be scary to people? You are locked away from your family and friends and are
being told when and what to eat and how to dress and act.

The Importance Of Punishment
Punishment is the most powerful way to make people behave better because it shows them that their actions have consequences. Punishment is not
telling people that they are special and being too nice to them. A teenager getting smart with their parents and getting grounded is a punishment that
will help the teenager know to knock it off. Punishment is also necessary on a grand scale too. An example is Larry Nasser. He was accused of
sexually assaulting young girls on the U.S. Olympic team and is going to prison. Doing something wrong should be dealt with by punishing the
wrongdoer.
Research shows that the fear of punishment will increase production and force better behavior because you know your actions have consequences. The
University of...show more content...
Adler's Research shows "Since 2001, there has been a decline in executions and an increase in murders." (Capital Punishment Works) This shows that
while there wasn't a harsh punishment enforced people would think they could do whatever they wanted and just go to jail instead of being punished
worse. Adler and summers say "evidence, however, suggests that each execution carried out is correlated with about 74 fewer murders the following
year" This shows that executions scare the people who would otherwise not be scared of a lesser sentence. Capital punishment decreases the number of
murders because the people are scared to get killed themselves for doing the wrong thing.
There are lots of examples on how threatening punishment works better than the alternative of being nice and helping people along. One example is
threatening to ground your kids or hitting their hands when they touch something they're not supposed to. Being nice and saying that it is okay would
just make the kids think that they can keep doing it. This is relevant because it shows that the threat of punishment works better in that circumstance
and not helping along. Another example is military members having to do pushups or go for a run when they mess up their cadence or anything else.
This is important because

Crime And Punishment In Victorian Era Essay
Adam McVicker
Mrs. Homon
English, 7
17 March 2016
In the Victorian era there was Crime and Punishment due to the lack of police. Due to the lack of police the punishment wasn't as it is today. Here
are some facts about the punishment, crime and what they had for jails. Punishment was huge in this era because there were people being punished.
The crime that came with this era was huge. There was change that came with crime " as towns grew and crime levels increased, people became more
and more worried about how criminals could be kept under control," (vcp.e2bn.org). Because of the amount of people moving into towns the crime rate
increased. People in this era believed that prison was an acceptable punishment because the other punishments were...show more content...
One of the people that Jack the Ripper murdered was Annie Chapman. There is an example of one of the crimes " On September 8, 1888, he murdered
a plump forty–five–year–old woman named Annie Chapman," (Rosinsky, 19). Because of this murder he started a bunch more muders. He spread
so much terror because of the crimes he committed, In the book Jack the Ripper , Natalie M. Rosinsky says about Jack the Ripper" terror spread
throughout the city as police tried to find and arrest the savage killer," (10). He was such a good killer that no one ever knew who he was. Since Jack
the Ripper was never caught there were a lot of people suspected of being

Punishment Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Punishment Essay