For Death Penalty Essay

Benefits of the Death Penalty Essay
Have you ever thought about if the person next to you is a killer or a rapist? If he is, what would
you want from the government if he had killed someone you know? He should receive the death
penalty! Murderers and rapists should be punished for the crimes they have committed and should
pay the price for their wrongdoing. Having the death penalty in our society is humane; it helps the
overcrowding problem and gives relief to the families of the victims, who had to go through an event
such as murder. Without the death penalty, criminals would be more inclined to commit additional
violent crimes. Fear of death discourages people from committing crimes. If capital punishment were
carried out more it would prove to be the crime...show more content...
The death penalty has been around since the time of Jesus Christ. Executions have been recorded
from the 1600s to present times. From about 1620, the executions by year increased in the US. It
has been a steady increase up until the 1930s; later the death penalty dropped to zero in the 1970s
and then again rose steadily. US citizens said that the death penalty was unconstitutional because it
was believed that it was "cruel and unusual" punishment (Kurtis 67). In the 1970s, the executions
by year dropped between zero and one then started to rise again in the 1980s. In the year 2000,
there were nearly one hundred executions in the US (Biskupic 34). On June 29, 1972, the death
penalty was suspended because the existing laws were no longer convincing. However, four years
after this occurred, several cases came about in Georgia, Florida, and Texas where lawyers wanted
the death penalty. This set new laws in these states and later the Supreme Court decided that the
death penalty was constitutional under the Eighth Amendment (Biskupic 34).
The very first legal executions came in the United States was during the Revolutionary War against
Great Britain. British soldiers hung the first person to die by the death penalty, Nathan Hale, for
espionage (Foley 167). The reason that I have included this history is to prove that if something has
been working, why stop
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Death Penalty Is Necessary Essay
The death penalty otherwise known as capital punishment, is the most extreme punishment a
government can implement on its own people. Presently, only eight–six countries have completely
abolished the use of capital punishment, while seventy–four countries still retain some use of the
death penalty. Throughout history, the controversy over the necessity of the use of the death penalty
has continued. Many oppose the death penalty on basis of moral and ethical grounds, but one must
keep in mind that capital punishment is not an excessive and unnecessary form of punishment for
those who knowingly and intentionally commit a severe crime in premeditation and that the words
"kill," "murder," and "execute" are not interchangeable. Once a person...show more content...
Therefore, the death penalty can be used to deter future murderers and in turn will spare the lives of
potential victims.
Justice demands that those convicted of heinous crimes, typically of murder should be sentenced to
death. Justice is essentially a matter of ensuring that everyone is treated equally. Therefore, it
requires that society imposes on criminals' losses equal to those that they have imposed on the
victims. In other words, "an eye for an eye," where offenders deserve the most severe punishment
possible: the death penalty. Any lesser punishment than this undermines the value of a just society.
"A just society requires the death penalty in exchange for taking a life. When someone takes a life,
the balance between justice and injustice is upset. Unless the balance is restored society becomes
subject to violence and only the taking of the murderer's life can restore balance and show society
that murder and many crimes like it are intolerable and are punished in kind." ("Death Penalty A
Curriculum for High School Students and Teachers")
To satisfy legal justice if one has committed murder or any other serious crime, then to restore
balance they must die as well. By taking the offender's life, society will know that such acts are
intolerable and will not go unpunished. Therefore, by inflicting the death penalty on those who have
deliberately inflicted crimes on others, society ensures justice for all.
As long as

The Death Penalty Discussion Essay
The Death Penalty Discussion
In today's world terrible crimes are being committed daily. Many people believe that these criminals
deserve one fate; death. Death penalty is the maximum sentence used in punishing people who kill
another human being and is a very controversial method of punishment. Capital punishment is a legal
infliction of death penalty and since ancient times it has bee used to punish a large variety of
offences. Criminals convicted of murder or rape need to be executed because they are danger to
society and the human race. Other people still argue that one method of execution is just as brutal as
the next.
The common sense argument that death is the best deterrent of crime...show more content...
Society and its mixed feelings towards the death penalty; capital punishment is such a harsh and
uncivilised way of treating criminals, but do they look at how the criminals are acting towards
ending other human beings life. They do not care about the lives they have destroyed, or, the
families of their victims. The death penalty can never bring back loved ones back to their families.
It seems rationally to think that if potential killers are aware that if they commit serious crimes they
would be put to death for it, they are less likely to commit these crimes again.
The concept of retribution and justice should bestow to society. This is imperative for peace to be
maintained and that justice is served. If criminals were allowed to get away with such a serious
crime as taking a humans life fear and chaos would rule. Sentence for life in prison will not be
substantial enough. The government must be trusted to protect its innocent citizens from further
crimes. A vast conception concerning death penalty is that it saves society the costs of keeping
inmates imprisoned for long periods. In the act of preserving due process of justice, the court
appeals involved with the death penalty becomes a long, drawn out and a long expensive process.
Does it save its purpose? Does executing someone for crimes such as rape, murder, adultery,
homosexual behaviour, and prostitution actually prevent

Support of the Death Penalty Essay
I do support the death penalty and I do not consider it cruel or unusual treatment. The Constitution
itself indicates that the death penalty can be used. Amendment V of the Constitution states that
"...no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...." (U.S.
Const., amend V). In other words, once a person has gone through the due process of law, his life
can be taken if he is found guilty. There is a common misconception that murderers do not think
about the end consequence. If that was the case, there would be more killings by police than arrests.
When murderers are confronted by policeman, they normally surrender because of the threat of the
lethal weapon pointed at them. This is a conscious...show more content...
(Pro Death Penalty, 2010). These statistics alone show that capital punishment is a deterrent to
murder.
In 1975 Isaac Ehrlich examined U.S time–series data for the period 1933–1969. In Ehrlich's study,
time–series data was data for the entire U.S. He used deterrent variables (the probabilities of arrest,
conviction, and execution), demographic variables (population, fraction of nonwhites, fraction of
people age 14–24), economic variables (labor force participation, unemployment rate, real per capita
permanent income, per capita government expenditures, and per capita expenditures on police), and
a time variable. His findings indicated a big negative relationship between the murder rate and
execution rate. In conclusion, he estimated that each execution resulted in approximately seven or
eight fewer murders. (Ehrlich's study as cited Shepherd, 2004).
I think that capital punishment has been applied fairly in our justice system. The cases that could
possibly involve a death sentence are tried by a jury of our peers. I feel that with a jury, human
perspective and compassion comes into play. If the crime was such as a mother killing the killer of
her child, the pain and suffering of the mother is usually taken into consideration. Such cases where
the murder or rape was heinously vicious with no sense of motive or remorse, this is also taken into
consideration. DNA has proven that many people who were convicted and sentence to die were

Reasons For The Death Penalty Essay
There is nothing humane about killing a human being. The act of committing murder is offensive
and cruel (Mappes, DeGrazia & Zembaty, 2012). Justice can be served in various ways and will be
as effective as the death penalty. Life imprisonment without parole is one such way of dealing with
persons convicted of committing a murder (Mappes, DeGrazia & Zembaty, 2012).
While abolitionists and retentionists continue to discuss their viewpoints on the death penalty, it
does appear that the retentionists do not have any concrete arguments other than retaining the death
penalty as a form of retribution for murders committed. However, as the abolitionists propose it is
worthwhile for individuals to pay the penalty of a crime in a humane manner (Mappes, DeGrazia &
Zembaty, 2012).
1.Religious worldviews do not support the death penalty. It is a global understanding that the Bible
indicates that humans should not take each other lives. The teaching of the Bible supports a moral
lifestyle and in most cultures the Bible has a significant impact on how individuals should treat each
other.
2.Reiman, Stephenson & Bolinko stated that "all lives are absolute, and the death penalty is wrong".
Each human being believes that they are valuable to society and deserves a right to life. Waking up
each day is an internal joy for most individuals. Existence means everything to them.
3.Judicial errors have been prevalent in the court system and innocent persons sometimes pay the
penalty for acts

Is the Death Penalty Ethical? Essay examples
"More than 4,500 people have been executed in the United States since 1930. There is no way of
knowing how many have been executed in U.S. history because executions were often local
affairs, with no central agency keeping track of them (Maloney, 1999)." Over 4,500 people were
executed and this doesn't even include the unreported deaths. Decades ago, death penalty cases
were not even to be reported in many times. For many years, people have been rationalize
themselves for death penalty as " an eye for an eye"(2010).This "eye for an eye" statement is no
longer giving any excuses for killing humans. The controversial idea of whether humans are rational
enough to decide someone's life or death has been questioned. Humans absolutely don't have...show
more content...
People who commit the crime should get imprisoned for what they did for how long ever it is
given. Murderer who took away other's lives should be imprisoned for what they did for the rest
of their lives. Death penalty is absolutely not necessary because imprison itself will take away the
whole lives; they will not be allowed to have any life as human in society. We kill him, because he
killed is simply how death penalty works. Death penalty is only to take away people's life, not
reasonable punishment for their sin. Of course, people think death penalty is not just about the
punishment. People who believe in death penalty show the reason why they do is that death penalty
for sure is a deterrent to homicide. They also take this as a justification of supporting death penalty
system (2010). So people actually expect something out of this system other than just killing the
murderers simply for what they did. This is supposed to be a great solution to make better society by
lessoning the potential crime. In theory, the fact that society has a death penalty system should
somewhat scares the potential murderer and prevents them from committing murder. But the
percentage of murder crime shows the otherwise. Do potential murderers consider the death penalty
before they the murder? The answers are likely to be No. "Most deterrence research has found that

The Death Penalty Essay
Is the death penalty really a rational and effective way to respond to the crimes of certain prisoners?
Thirty one percent of society believes we should not keep the death penalty, while others believe that
the death penalty doesn't really keep crime from happening. Of the thirty one percent, many believe
that executing offenders of the law only runs away from the issue at hand. Also, if society thinks
about it, ending the penalty would cost less both physically and mentally. Lastly, abolishment of the
penalty would help rid any of the negative and humane issues at hand: this involves the biblical
verse; thou shalt not kill, and the national human rights law; article 3, and 5 of the Declaration of
Independence. Is the death penalty going...show more content...
Since 1983, 60 mentally ill people have been executed. Also, it is estimated that around five to ten
percent of the death row inmates are diagnosed with some form of mental illness.
Second, ending the death penalty would cost less, when involving the physical and emotional costs
of the punishment. Within the physical aspects of the death penalty, it costs around 90,000 a year
per inmate to stay on death row. The average estimated amount for each inmate, in total, is two
million dollars. Death row costs almost four times as much as life imprisonment without parole.
Since the death penalty costs such a great amount of money, this leads tax payers to pay thousands
of unnecessary money towards the cause. If society realized that they were spending a bunch of
their money on killing inmates, they may rethink allowing the penalty in the first place. When
involving the emotional costs of the punishment, ending the death penalty would also cost less.
Not only do people have to give up some of their annual salary, they also have to give up their
mercy, compassion, and the family of the inmate's heartache. There is rarely any family who wants
to see their loved one executed. The family is always trying to get the court to change their mind
and allow the inmate to live. If a young child had a mother on death row, wouldn't that be cruel to
take the mother away

The Death Penalty Research Paper
Andrew Cruz
Ms. Rachel Williams
Reading
28 April 2011
Research Paper on the Death Penalty The death penalty is a capital punishment that is put into
effect for major crimes. The death penalty is a very controversial topic in the United States and
throughout the world. There was a time period were the death penalty was banned for about four
years in 1972–1976. Many feel that the death penalty is justice because it is retribution toward
criminals who have committed heinous crimes. However the death penalty is inhumane and should
be abolished in the United States. The death penalty has been around since the beginning of
civilization. "Capital Punishment has been practiced in most known societies over the course of
humans history"...show more content...
It is irrational to think that the death penalty – a remote threat at best – will avert murders committed
in drug turf wars or by street–level dealers" (Bedau). This shows that the death penalty is not
stopping murders from occurring. The introduction to the death penalty conducted a survey were top
criminologists stated that the death penalty does not deter homicide rates (Introduction). "For 2009,
the average Murder Rate of Death Penalty States was 4.9 [Murder rates by the 100,000], while the
average Murder Rate of States without the Death Penalty was 2.8" (Introduction).
Not only does the death penalty not deter crime but it is also very expensive. The death penalty
costs so much because of the appeal process. The appeal process is a very long and expensive
process that can go on forever and costs the government millions. Many assume that abolishing the
death penalty is wrong because it becomes unfair to the taxpayers because they think the cost is
less than that of life in prison without parole. However life in prison is less expensive than the
death penalty (Bedau). The death penalty is actually three times more than keeping a prisoner in
prison for life without parole (Messerli). Death penalty trials are costly as well. "[S]tudies estimate
that death penalty trials cost $1

The Cons of the Death Penalty Essay
The Cons of the Death Penalty
"...Over 600 people were falsely convicted and 35 faced death for crimes that they did not
commit..."(Johnson). The death penalty is an ineffective and expensive way of dealing justice to
the American people. It is easier and cheaper to send someone to prison for life than to have them
face the death penalty and be executed. Capital punishment is an unnecessary punishment because
criminals are already managed at prisons.
69
The death penalty can lead to the death of innocent people. For example, "...According to a new
study, serious errors occur in almost 70% of all trials leading to the death penalty..."(Leibman). This
shows that if 100 people were put on death row, 70 would have serious mistakes in their...show more
content...
The lack of proper resources during a trial can make the difference between the innocence and
guilt of a person. The death penalty does not always show the innocence or guilt of a person. It
shows how much he or she is willing to spend to help the trial go his or her way. The death penalty
is an unfair system to those who cannot afford the "evidence" they need to help free them.
224
The death penalty is a corrupt form of legal justice. For example, "...Defendants in about one–third of
the Texas cases were represented at trial by an attorney who had been or later was suspended or
otherwise sanctioned..."(Leibman). This use of fraudulent attorneys in a case can lead to enough
inaccuracies in the evidence to wrongfully execute a person. This action is against the
constitutional right given to us of equal justice for all. In addition, "...One of you two is gonna
hang for this. Since you're the nigger, you're elected..."(Texas Police Officer). A Texas police
officer said this to 2 men, one black and one white that were connected to the murder of a
17–year–old girl. Race plays a big part in the sentence of guilty or innocent. However, supporters of
the death penalty claim "...that it enforces the laws by issuing strict punishment to the
offenders..."(President George Bush). The death

Ethos On Death Penalty
The death penalty has been a huge part of many political debates for the past few decades. There
are two sides, those for and those against its continued use and both have logical arguments. My
research question is if it is ethical and or beneficial for the U.S. government to continue using the
death penalty? To gain the attention of my audience, I am going to share two stories that my sources
have on those with experience in the debate. The Forbes article, "Considering The Death Penalty:
Your Tax Dollars At Work," is an anti
–death penalty piece explaining how an innocent man was on
death row and his opinion on whether or not it should be used. He said in the piece that living out a
life sentence without parole is worse than being executed....show more content...
One, saying it is inhumane and should not be done and the other side says that it is necessary in our
society. Some of the non–biased sources go over just the statistics of the death penalty. This
includes "DEATH PENALTY INFORMATION CENTER Facts about the Death Penalty" and
"Should the Death Penalty Be Allowed?". The first article explains the costs associated with the
punishment, how much it is used, states that use it, and people on death row. The second piece
gives unbiased statistics on the pros and cons on the death penalty. By providing this background,
I hope my audience will be more aware of the debate and have more information. I will then
incorporate a few more factual based articles to try and provide all the necessary details, such as
"Death Penalty Pro Con" and a few more biased articles then to get opinions going. I feel that all
my sources work well together as even when the articles have different viewpoints, they do not
contradict one another much. Basically, they highlight the importance of their own arguments and
do not really go after the other side. Overall, I feel that I have the sources necessary to write this
piece. However, I do feel that having a few more scholarly articles will only help my

A Persuasive Speech On The Death Penalty
Persuasive Speech:
Why I Believe the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished Hello, everyone. My name is Devlin
O'Connell and I am going to be speaking to you today about why I believe the death penalty should
be abolished. There are three factors that I base this argument off which surround ethics, efficiency,
and expenditure. In relationship to ethics, I would like to begin with a quote by human rights
activist, Desmond Tutu, "To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice."Capital
Punishment, also known as the Death Penalty, is described as a government practice where a person
is put to death by the state as a punishment for crimes such as murder, treason, espionage, and
genocide. While it may seem unlikely that many people would be convicted of a few of the latter
crimes, there were nearly 3,000 people on death row in the last year. Of those 3,000 people, 117
were found to be innocent. It is predicted that at least 3% more of those sentenced would have been
exonerated with enough time and resources. Let that sink in. An untold number of innocent people
have been executed. As it is, many relatives of victims have said that they do not wish for their
relative's killer to be put to death. Circling back to Tutu's quote, the government is not providing
these families with justice – but with revenge.
We are "perpetuating a cycle of violence unworthy of a civilized society," to quote Bernice King,
"retribution cannot light the way to the genuine healing that

Opinion on the Death Penalty Essay
Opinion on the Death Penalty
The death penalty, also referred to as capital punishment, has been abolished in Canada since 1976,
but still exist in a few American States. The last execution in Canada took place in 1962.
I disagree with the death penalty for several reasons. My first reason is that I find it extremely
inhumane to take someone's life in order to demonstrate the power of the law. Another reason for
my disapproval of the death penalty, is the amount of money that it takes to put someone to death,
as it would cost the same to keep an inmate in jail for life, as it would to put that same inmate to
death. My third and final reason, is the guilty conscience that is placed on everyone involved: the
jury who convicted...show more content...
Therefore, I do not feel that Canada should permit such a deplorable undertaking of a human life. I
know they must be punished, but there is a better way.
Prior to putting someone to death, the accused's lawyer will attempt several appeals to the courts in
order to lengthen the amount of time he has to live; and dependent on a technicality, or a
sympathetic jury, the accused may be sentenced to life imprisonment. These appeals take up an
abundance of court time and cost the public millions of dollars. With the cost of these appeals, it
would cost the same amount to keep the same inmate in jail for a life term.
Would it not be better for the inmate to perhaps obtain an education or be given the chance to
rehabilitate, rather than strapped to a chair and killed ??? I personally would rather see the inmate
suffer in prison and have nothing to look forward to rather than letting the government put him out
of his misery by killing him. To sentence someone to death takes one trial but to actually get some
one in the chair to kill them could take a dozen of trials. The question must be asked why do we
bother with this lengthy and costly process when we could sentence people to life in prison, at the
same cost.
The killing of a human being is very traumatizing to all. Whenever the courts issue someone to death,
the innocent everyday people who are involved must be affected. Just imagine how these normal
human beings, like you and I,

A Thesis Statement For Death Penalty
I.Introduction
A.Startling Statement
B.Some information and recent data with regards to the implementation of death penalty globally
will be briefly discussed.
C.Historical Background of the Death Penalty in the Philippines
D.Thesis Statement
II.Body
A.Counterarguments
1.The death penalty deters individuals from committing crimes; therefore, the crime rates decrease.
2.As a respond to society's demands for justice, the death penalty as a form of retribution is justified
because the criminal deserves the punishment fitted to the severity of the crime he or she committed.
3.The death penalty provides a more precise legal and constitutional due process that extrajudicial
killings lack.
B.Own Arguments
1.Economically, the death penalty will not benefit the country in the long run.
2.The death penalty is proven to have no deterrent effect on crimes
3.The death penalty is disadvantageous and biased towards the lower class of the society.
4.The criminal justice and judicial systems in the Philippines are proven to be flawed and
susceptible to mistakes.
III.Conclusion
A.Quotation "history will just repeat itself"
B.Summary
C.Restate the stand of the research paper
D.Challenge the readers to think rationally and...show more content...
Moreover, 2015 has the highest number of executions recorded since 1989 that accounts to 1,634
criminals executed in the span of only a year; in fact, the data do not include China that keeps the
number of executions a secret of the state. The 58 countries that continue to implement the death
penalty include Japan, North Korea, Singapore, United States of America, China, and Iraq. On the
other hand, the abolitionists in law and practice include Myanmar, Australia, Germany, United

Kingdom, Mexico, and Philippines. ("Death

Synthesis Essay On The Death Penalty
For most of human civilisation, death sentences have been in common use. Most of the time, death
sentences have been issued to people who break the law. However, the use of death is controversial
in its effects and morality. Today, the death penalty is constantly debated about on whether it should
be used or not. The death penalty is usually issued to those commit "terrorism, treason, hijacking
resulting in the death of a hostage, or the killing of a police[officer] or prison guard acting in the line
of duty" (Source D). As source B indicates, opinions on the death penalty are mixed as the
percentages of those in favour and of those opposed fluctuate. The death penalty is unjust as a form
of punishment for committing a major felony. The death penalty is permanent and is morally
wrong. The penalty of death is a permanent solution as a punishment. Often times in court cases,
there is a "likelihood of a miscarriage of justice"(Source C). There is often a miscarriage of justice
in cases. In court cases, there are doubts that are voiced. If they are ordered the death penalty, they
may be found out to be innocent. However, they...show more content...
The mother of a murder victim has stated "Responding to one killing with another killing does
not [honour] my daughter"(Source F). The killing of another person doesn't mean we should kill
another for justice. In reality, the death sentences is based on emotional reactions as we try to
sympathise with the victims. This should not be the way cases should be run, since they should
be based off factual evidence. Society needs to realise that "The standard for depriving one of life
should be higher than any other legal action"(Source C). The loss of a life is a difficult choice to
make as a society, even if it's the judgement of a criminal. However, we are no better than the
criminal if we kill them as well. People need to learn from its mistakes, as well as help others learn
from their

A Debate of the Death Penalty Essay
The death penalty raises important questions about the right to life, who has a right to life, and
under what circumstances a right to life can be taken away. I believe there are no circumstances
under which capital punishment is justified. I will proceed to defend my claim that capital
punishment is unjustified by arguing a position that killing is wrong because it deprives individuals
of valuable futures. To support my thesis that capital punishment is not justified, I will expand upon
an argument made my Don Marquis in his essay "Why Abortion is Immoral" in which he argues that
killing is immoral on the grounds that it deprives human beings of a valuable future. My argument
is as follows:
1.Killing is wrong because it deprives the...show more content...
The outside factors and conditions are irrelevant. Rather, the value is determined by how that
person perceives his or her own life and these future experiences. Thus, when someone is killed, he
or she is deprived of all the things that were of value and will be of value to him or her in the
future. Causing this loss of a valuable future is ultimately what makes killing wrong and immoral
because that individual has permanently lost the opportunity to enjoy his or her future experiences
which are valuable to him or her. My second premise states that death row criminals are in the same
moral category as other human beings with respect to the moral value of their lives. The only factor
which differentiates a criminal from a non–criminal is the fact that the criminal, usually irrefutably,
violated community standards and the law to commit a crime. In the case of a criminal on death row,
he or she would have had to have committed a serious capital crime to receive the death sentence.
Since committing a capital offense is the only reason death row criminals are different from other
human beings, death row criminals are the same as other human beings in every other respect,
including with respect to the value of their futures. Furthermore, the future of a criminal on death
row is just as valuable as the future of a human being not on death row. Any form of capital
punishment is a form of killing. It does not matter who is actually doing the

Essay on Death Penalty
Death Penalty
The death penalty is a controversial topic in the United States today and has been for a number of
years. The death penalty was overturned and then reinstated in the United States during the 1970's
due to questions concerning its fairness. The death penalty began to be reinstated slowly, but the rate
of executions has increased during the 1990's. There are a number of arguments for and against the
death penalty. Many death penalty supporters feel that the death penalty reduces crime because it
deters people from committing murder if they know that they will receive the death penalty if they
are caught. Others in favor of the death penalty feel that even if it doesn't deter others from
committing crimes, it will eliminate...show more content...
People opposed to the death penalty also point to the fact that over half of the countries in the world
have abolished the death penalty, including all other major industrialized, democratic nations. In the
five countries with the highest homicide rates that do not impose the death penalty, the murder rate
is 21.6 murders per 100,000 people. In the five countries with the highest homicide rates that do
impose the death penalty, the murder rate is 41.6 murders per 100,000 people ("Deterrence").
Furthermore, the United States has the highest crime and murder rates of any of the other major
democratic nations, all of which have abandoned the death penalty. In 1965, Great Britain called for
a five–year suspension on executions following a recent decline in the imposition of the death
penalty and growing anti–death penalty sentiments in the country. In 1969, the government
abolished the death penalty altogether because there had been no surge in homicides or crime
(Flanders 45). Death penalty opponents feel that these statistics lend credibility to the argument that
the death penalty does not cause a decrease in homicides and in some instances may even lead to an
increase in murders. Another valid point that death penalty opponents use is that the judicial system
is not flawless, and that in the United

Pro Death Penalty Essay
Capital punishment and the practice of the death penalty is an issue that is passionately debated in
the United States. Opponents of the death penalty claim that capital punishment is unnecessary
since a life sentence accomplishes the same objective. What death penalty opponents neglect to tell
you is that convicted murders and child rapists escape from prison every year(List of prison
escapes, 2015). As I write this essay, police are searching for two convicted murders who escaped
from the Clinton Correctional Facility in Dannemora, New York on June 6th, 2015. The ONLY
punishment from which one cannot escape is the death penalty.
Opponents of the death penalty believe capital punishment is unnecessary and inappropriate in our
modern...show more content...
A fifth rationale in opposition is that the death penalty is too expensive or too costly to taxpayers
to justify its use. According to those who oppose the death penalty and certain studies, it costs
more to execute a person than to keep him or her in prison for life (Death Penalty Focus, 2015).
Finally, it is believed by some that the killing at the hands of the state is not a righteous act but
instead is on the same moral level as the murderers themselves.
According to capital punishment supporters, many of these reasons of the anti–death penalty
movement are false and are now wrongly accepted as fact. The argument that the death penalty does
not deter crime is debatable. By executing murderers you prevent them from murdering again. If
these people no longer exist then they obviously cannot commit more crimes. In addition, criminals
have admitted, in thousands of fully documented cases, that the death penalty was the specific threat
which deterred them from committing murder (Pro–Death Penalty, 2014). The opponents of capital
punishment claim that the death penalty has caused and can cause the execution of innocent people.
However, according to the supporters, no evidence indicates that innocent people have been
executed. Upon reviewing 23 years of capital sentences, a Wall Street Journal study indicated that
they were unable to find a single case in which an innocent person was executed (Eddlem, 2002).
Furthermore, advocates note that the

Abstract On The Death Penalty
Abstract
The issue of capital punishment is a difficult one and the opinions are as diverse as the people
giving them. The death penalty exists in 38 states and those that have it spend enormous amounts
of tax payer dollars to engage the justice system in what is a long and drawn out series of court
dates and appeals that are lasting years. In addition, the trials and appeals of those on Death Row
will have attorneys, prosecutors, experts and judges with more experience creating a major strain
on the budget and manpower of the state. Nationally there is no study identifying the cost
associated with the Death Penalty, but each state uses their state laws and pay scales in
determining the cost of the Death Penalty. Prior to the Death Penalty being abolished New York
has spent millions of dollars on Death Penalty cases and the result was there were no executions.
Those in favor of the death penalty believe that the cost associated with incarcerating an
individual for life will far outweigh those associated with the Death Penalty, due to old age,
medical issues, food and other essentials needed to keep one alive. This would be true if the Death
Penalty was a swift method of justice. The monies spent on Death Penalty cases could be far better
spent on local budgets and programs that are evidenced based and proven to provide needed
services, such as law enforcement, drug treatment and youth programs.
Beginning

Thesis Statement For Death Penalty
TITLE: Rejecting Death Penalty
Thesis Statement: Death Penalty should not be implemented here in the Philippines, because this is
not a proper way to punish having death penalty for any person made crime.
Problem: Should we legalize Death Penalty here in the Philippines.
I.Introduction: Description of Death Penalty
II.Body
Main Idea (1): Crimes Punishable Death Penalty 1.1 Murder 1.2 Rape
Main Idea (2): President view death Penalty 2.1 Improve economy 2.2 No person will kill
Main Idea (3): Rejecting Death Penalty 3.1 Jails will be use 3.2 Shall not Kill Introduction: Death
penalty if there's an efficient administration of justice in the country. The re–imposition of the death
penalty in the country had been the main argument...show more content...
This is not a proper way to punish any person. The proper way to punish any person is to put
inside the jail in no particular way to take them away. The death penalty is one of the most hotly
debated subjects in our society. Controversy surroundings the issue is emotional with proponents for
and against the death penalty arguing their position by using appeals to emotion appeals to pity and
use of expert opinion. Death penalty has been controversial issue, for many years. It was established
centuries ago and has been accepted by our society. It was put into place to punish those who had
committed an offences against laws of the institution was in the place at the time.
Recommendation: The death penalty. Some people for me feel that it is a good punishment for
some people deserve it an some people feel that the death penalty is taking away somebody's life
which is
God's job. Death penalty is justified death penalty is also known as a capital punishment or death
execution, it is a way to give a person death for his/her crime. However, there are more and more
people who think death penalty is justified have some points. Death penalty has been as high as
eighty

Against The Death Penalty Essay
Against the Death Penalty "Murder is wrong" ("Capital Punishment"). We've been taught this
indisputable truth since childhood. The death penalty is defined as one human taking the life of
another. Coincidentally, that is a classification of murder. There are as many as thirty
–six states with
the death penalty, and it's essential that they change it. The United States needs the death penalty
abolished because it is filled with flaws, cruel and immoral, and is an ineffective means of deterrent
for crime. I understand why you would want to have the death penalty in effect. You probably think
that it will be cheaper to execute people instead of paying taxes for them in jail. There is also a
probability that you think that you will...show more content...
Another flaw is it is morally wrong. No matter how people sugar–coat it, murder is murder, in the
name of justice or in vengeance it is morally wrong. Everyone deserves to live, no matter their
circumstances are. Federal states should not be allowed to decide who lives and who dies,
especially in a country such as the United States, which prides its self on freedom ("Top Ten").
Moreover, the death penalty is applied at random ("Facts"). "The death penalty is a lethal lottery: of
the 15,000 to 17,000 homicides committed every year in the United States, approximately 120
people are sentenced to death, less than 1%" ("Facts"). Many criminals have committed the same
crimes, but few have been sentenced to death for their crimes. In Addition, there is a chance
mentally ill citizens could be convicted to death ("Facts"). According to Amnesty International and
the National Association on Mental Illness, One out of every ten persons who has been executed in
the United States since 1977 is mentally ill. "Many mentally ill defendants are unable to participate
in their trials in any meaningful way and appear unengaged, cold, and unfeeling before the jury"
("Facts"). Many mentally ill defendants have been drugged against their will in order for them to be
competent enough to be executed ("Facts"). Some states still haven't put a ban on executing
mentally ill people such as Organ, although the United States Supreme Court has declared that

For Death Penalty Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Best Online Paper Writing Service

More from Best Online Paper Writing Service (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

For Death Penalty Essay