The Slope of Our Beaches and How it Affects Sea Turtle Nestgin
1. The Slope of Our Beaches and How
it Affects Sea Turtle Nesting
Emily Hardin
Jaymie Reneker
2. Introduction – Groins
} Installed in 1996
} Currently 15 groins
} Tubes made of geotextile materials and filled with sand
} Used to combat erosion
5. Introduction – Beach Nourishment
} Section of South Beach is re-nourished
} 650,000 m3 of sand initially dredged and added
} Re-nourished every few years
} Thought to have negative effects on sea turtle nesting
Village of Bald Head Island
Slurry Systems Marine Pty Ltd
6. Introduction – Beach Nourishment and Sea
Turtles
} Increases the amount of nest-able beach
} Affects:
} Sand composition and temperature
} Slope
} Loggerheads nest more frequently in areas with less shells
(Garmestani, et al. 2000)
} Number of nests has been found to decrease after
nourishment (Rumbold, et al. 2001)
7. Introduction - Slope
} Slope is the most influential factor in nest site selection
(Wood & Bjorndal 2000)
} Slope preference can vary among species (Cuevas, et al. 2010)
} Hawksbill prefer less steep beaches
} Greens prefer more steep beaches
} Loggerheads prefer flatter slopes (Garmestani, et al. 2000)
} Different populations may have different preferences
(Cuevas, 2010)
Gnaraloo Turtle Conservation Program
8. Objectives
} Measure slope in four areas of Bald Head Island:
} South Beach – groin field and re-nourishment
} South Beach – natural
} East Beach – developed
} East Beach – undeveloped
9. Objectives
} Measure slope in four areas of Bald Head Island
} Measure the slope of sea turtle nests
} Determine if:
} Slope varies over the course of the summer
} Slope varies from location to location
} Sea turtles have a preferred slope
} Which beach is preferred by turtles
10. Methods
} Used slope profile poles
} Started at vegetation line, measured to water line
} Measurements taken at low tide (± 2 hrs)
} Measurements taken every 2 weeks
11. Methods
} Measure the slope of nests
} Caged nests: began halfway on
either side of cage
} Relocated nests: from center of
body pit at original site
} ANOVA test to determine if measurements differed
significantly
} p-value of 0.05
12. Results
} Did the slope change over time?
} All areas except the natural section of South Beach changed
significantly
} Groins, p=4.5x10-8
} East Developed, p=3.4x10-5
} East Undeveloped, p=0.04
} South Natural, p=0.30
} Second measurements
seemed to be the greatest
13. Results
} Does the slope vary from location to location?
} No significant difference in the average slope of each location
(p=0.77)
} Groins have steepest slope
14. Results
} Do our sea turtles have a preferred slope?
} No, the slopes of nests are not statistically similar
}
15. Results
} Which beaches do our turtles prefer?
} Average slope of nests = -2.38
} Most similar to South Natural and East Developed
16. Conclusions & Implications
} Slope changes over time
} Bald Head Island has a pretty uniform slope on all its
beaches
} Groins and beach re-nourishment are NOT affecting slope
} Our population does not have a preferred slope
} Since the slope changes frequently, this allows them to be able
to nest throughout the summer
} Average slope of ascents is similar to South Natural and
East Developed beach slope
} Majority of our nests
} Factors other than slope may be at play
17. Further Directions
} Year-long study to observe slope changes over multiple
seasons
} Measure the slope of false crawls
} Take measurements more frequently
} Look back at previous data and continue study over time
Amelia Island Sea Turtle Watch, Inc.
18. References
} Cuevas, E., Liceaga-Correa, M.A., Marino-Tapia, I. (2010). Influence of Beach
Slope and Width on Hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) and Green Turtle
(Chelonia mydas) Nesting Activity in El Cuyo,Yucatan, Mexico.
Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 9(2), 262-267.
} Denison, P.S. (1998). Beach Nourishment/groin field construction project:
Bald Head Island, North Carolina. Shore and Beach, 66(1), 2-9.
} Garmestani,A.S., Percival, H.F., Portier, K.M., Rice, K.G. (2000). Nest-Site
Selection by the Loggerhead Sea Turtle in Florida’s Ten Thousand
Islands. Journal of Herpetology, 34(4), 504-510.
} Rumbold, D.G., Davis, P.W., Perretta, C. (2001). Estimating the Effect of
Beach Nourishment on Caretta caretta (Loggerhead Sea Turtle)
Nesting. Restoration Ecology, 9(3), 304-310.
} Wood, D.W., Bjorndal, K.A. (2000). Relation of Temperature, Moisture,
Salinity, and Slope to Nest Site Selection in Loggerhead Sea Turtles.
Copeia, 2000(1), 119-128.
19. Acknowledgements
} Thank you to everyone who helped me measure!
} Brandt Quirk-Royal (+ modeling)
} Matt Salinski
} Connor Hinton (+ modeling)
} Amy Eldredge
} Abbie Dwire
} Savannah Currens
} Colleen MacGilvray
} Sara Thompson
} Thank you to the one and only:
} Jaymie Reneker