SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 35
Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons to determine best woods
for fish smoking
P.Anoja1, SSK Madage2*, RGS Wijesekara1, MMNP Gunasekara2
1 Department of Aquaculture and Fisheries , Faculty of Livestock, Fisheries & Nutrition, Wayamba
University of Sri Lanka.
2 Food Technology Section, Research and Development Division, Industrial Technology Institute,
363, Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo 7, Sri Lanka.
Presented by:
P.Anoja
(128560)
• Smoking
– Traditional method of preservation
– Modern food industry also use smoking processes
to obtain desired flavors in certain products (e.g.
ham, bacon, sausage)
– Around 2% of the total fish catch is used for
preparing smoked fish all over the world
(Kashyap.D et al., 2016).
• Different types of smoking methods
– Hot- smoking
– Cold- smoking
– Combined method of hot and cold smoking
– Liquid smoking
– Electrostatic smoking
• Smoking has combined effects in preservation
– Drying
– Salting
– Heat treatment
– Deposition of components.
• Composition of wood smoke is very complex.
 Unique flavor and color
 Bactericidal properties
 Antioxidant properties
• Contains hundreds of Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons( PAHs).
Wood smoke components
Desirable components Non-desirable components
Carcinogenic effect
Mutagenic effect
Immune suppressant
• Many of them are carcinogenic.
• Benzo[a]pyrene (Bap)
– Marker of the carcinogenic PAH (Stołyhwo and
Sikorski 2005)
– Maximum allowable limit in food- 0.031µg/kg in
EU
• Lack of awareness
• So the study will focused to minimize the
bad health effect due to smoking of fish.
Objectives
• Research objective
– To identify the safe type/s of firewood for
generating smoke in fish processing.
• Specific objectives
– To screen commonly used wood species for PAH
content in wood smoke
– To optimize the controlled conditions during the
production of smoke and extraction of PAHs
Methodology
• Study area: Food Technology Section,
Industrial Technology Institute.
• Duration : 15 weeks
• Basic steps
– Selection & Collection of fire woods
• Availability
• Abundance
• Cost
Cocos nucifera Borassus flabellifer
Cinnamomum verum Mangifera indicaAzadirachta indica
Artocarpus heterophyllus Drypetes sepiaria
Thespesia populnea
Cocos nucifera
– Wood preparation & quality analysis
• All types of woods with uniform conditions
• Quality analysis
Moisture analyzer
Dry them in uniform conditionCut into same size pieces
– Adoption of smoke collecting apparatus
A model of the apparatus
Distilled water
• Dissolve the Smoke except PAH
Ash trap
Smoker
•Controlled conditions
•Weight of wood- 1kg
•Smoldering time- 1 hour
• Selection of organic solvent
• Optimization of solvent mixture
• Acetonitrile : Acetone : Toluene = 6 : 3 : 1
•Total volume = 150 mL
PAH trap
• Maintains uniform flow rate,
• Facilitate the solubility of components
 Ash trap
 PAH trap
Vacuum pump
Pathway of smoke particles
Wood chamber
Smoke particles
Ash free smoke
PAH
particles
– PAHs extract was concentrate up to 50 mL
– High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
analysis
Rotary evaporator
Specific standard stock
solution
PAH Extract from wood
samples
• PAH analysis
– Instrument: Agilent 1260 Infinity
Quaternary Gradient HPLC
– Column: Eclipse PAH 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 um
– Flow: 2.0 mL/min
– Mobile Phase: Gradient Water: AcCN
– Detector: Fluorescence Ex/Em 260/352,
260/420, 260/460; UV 230 nm
Results and Discussion
Moisture content of wood samples
Samples Moisture content
Coconut husk 8.02±0.002
Coconut frond 6.52±0.003
Cinnamon 7.38±0.005
Jak 8.14±0.001
Mango 7.69±0.001
Margosa 8.75±0.006
Palmyrah 9.3±0.001
Portia 9.57±0.003
Weera 9.62±0.003
Moisture used in smoking is
less than 10-20%.
• Analysis of standard PAH solution using HPLC
method
Retention times o f peak Identification of PAH compounds
Area of peak Quantification of PAH compounds
Naphthalene
• Identification of PAH compounds
Signals Retention time Compounds
DAD 7.101
FLD1 A 7.118
FLD1 B ND Napthalene
FLD1 C ND
FLD1 D ND
DAD 8.019
FLD1 A ND
FLD1 B ND Acenapthylene
FLD1 C ND
FLD1 D ND
DAD 9.453
FLD1 A 9.471
FLD1 B ND Acenapthene
FLD1 C ND
FLD1 D ND
DAD 9.783
FLD1 A 9.8
FLD1 B ND Fluorene
FLD1 C ND
FLD1 D ND
Sixteen PAHs were
identified.
DAD- Diode Array Detector
FLD- Fluorescence detector
A,B,C,D- Different excitation
&emission wavelength
ND- Not Detected
Wood species PAH compounds
Coconut frond Napthalene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluorene
Palmyrah Naphthalene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Cinnamon Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Mango Naphthalene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Wood species PAH compounds
Jak Naphthalene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Margosa Naphthalene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Portia Naphthalene
Anthracene
Weera Naphthalene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Identification of PAH compounds from
different wood species
• Total quantification of PAHs in wood species
115.51
212.13
14.61
95.31
39.23
93.42
25.75
39.46
63.57
0
50
100
150
200
250Totalquantity(mg/L)
Wood samples
Classification of Carcinogenic PAHs (US-EPA)
Probable carcinogenic PAH Possible carcinogenic PAH Less carcinogenic PAH
Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Anthracene
Benzo(a) pyrene Benzo(j)fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(e)pyrene
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene Chrysene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Quantity of PAH compounds in wood samples
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Naphthalene
Acenapthylene
Acenapthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Napthalene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Naphthalene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Naphthalene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Naphthalene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Naphthalene
Anthracene
Naphthalene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Coconut husk Coconut frond Palmyrah Cinnamon Mango Jak Margosa Portia Weera
Quantity(mg/L)
Wood samples
Napthalene
Probable carcinogenic PAHs
Less carcinogenic PAHs
Summary
Wood
types
Probable carcinogenic
PAHs
Possible carcinogenic
PAHs
Less carcinogenic
PAHs
Coconut
husk
Coconut
frond
ND ND
Palmyrah
Cinnamon ND ND
Mango ND ND
Jak ND ND
Margosa ND ND
Weera ND ND
Portia ND ND
Conclusion
• Naphthalene is most commonly available PAH
• Coconut frond has highest amount of PAHs
than others.
• Most probable carcinogenic PAHs are available
in Coconut husk and Palmyrah.
• Mango, Margosa and Portia can be selected
as safe fire woods among these nine woods
Suggestions
• More replication helps to validate the results
• Further studies required,
– To improve the model of smoke collecting apparatus
– To conduct separate studies for each areas with commonly
using wood types.
Acknowledgements
• Department of Aquaculture and Fisheries, Faculty
of Livestock Fisheries and Nutrition, Wayamba
University of Sri Lanka, Makandura, Gonawila.
• Food Technology Section, Industrial Technology
Institute, Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo 07.
• Staffs of the Food Technology Section, Industrial
Technology Institute, Bauddhaloka Mawatha,
Colombo 07.
• References
– Kashyap. D., Bhuyan.S., Devi.R., and
Sharma.P.J.(2016). Smoking Preservative of Fish.
Aquatic fish database.[Online] Available from :
http://aquafind.com/articles/Smoking_Fish.php
[accessed 2016.07.19]
– Stołyhwo, A. and Sikorski, Z.E. (2005). Polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons in smoked fish – a critical
review. Food Chemistry , 91, pp.303–311.
Thank you

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

EDS 3140 Field Placement Journal Century Middle School
EDS 3140 Field Placement Journal Century Middle SchoolEDS 3140 Field Placement Journal Century Middle School
EDS 3140 Field Placement Journal Century Middle School
MaryEllen Elizabeth Hart
 

Viewers also liked (9)

уравнение 2
уравнение 2уравнение 2
уравнение 2
 
Identifikasi obat
Identifikasi obatIdentifikasi obat
Identifikasi obat
 
Sistemas de gestion de la energía bqto julio 2011
Sistemas de gestion de la energía bqto julio 2011Sistemas de gestion de la energía bqto julio 2011
Sistemas de gestion de la energía bqto julio 2011
 
Sistemas de Gestión de la energía Bqto julio 2011
Sistemas de Gestión de la energía Bqto julio 2011Sistemas de Gestión de la energía Bqto julio 2011
Sistemas de Gestión de la energía Bqto julio 2011
 
Müşteri Portföyü Yönetimi (Bahman Huseynli)
Müşteri Portföyü Yönetimi (Bahman Huseynli)Müşteri Portföyü Yönetimi (Bahman Huseynli)
Müşteri Portföyü Yönetimi (Bahman Huseynli)
 
Conheça a Bravos Capital.
Conheça a Bravos Capital.Conheça a Bravos Capital.
Conheça a Bravos Capital.
 
Cloudcomputing
CloudcomputingCloudcomputing
Cloudcomputing
 
EDS 3140 Field Placement Journal Century Middle School
EDS 3140 Field Placement Journal Century Middle SchoolEDS 3140 Field Placement Journal Century Middle School
EDS 3140 Field Placement Journal Century Middle School
 
Elevated Temperature Uniaxial Mechanical Compression Examination and Hot Roll...
Elevated Temperature Uniaxial Mechanical Compression Examination and Hot Roll...Elevated Temperature Uniaxial Mechanical Compression Examination and Hot Roll...
Elevated Temperature Uniaxial Mechanical Compression Examination and Hot Roll...
 

Similar to 128560 Research

Levels of PAHs and Potentially Toxic Metals in Three Species of Fresh and Smo...
Levels of PAHs and Potentially Toxic Metals in Three Species of Fresh and Smo...Levels of PAHs and Potentially Toxic Metals in Three Species of Fresh and Smo...
Levels of PAHs and Potentially Toxic Metals in Three Species of Fresh and Smo...
IOSR Journals
 
Comparison of different extraction methods for the extraction of total phenol...
Comparison of different extraction methods for the extraction of total phenol...Comparison of different extraction methods for the extraction of total phenol...
Comparison of different extraction methods for the extraction of total phenol...
Michal Jablonsky
 
Moringa oleifera-vs-stenopetala
Moringa oleifera-vs-stenopetalaMoringa oleifera-vs-stenopetala
Moringa oleifera-vs-stenopetala
Drumstick Moringa
 
IOSRPHR(www.iosrphr.org) IOSR Journal of Pharmacy
IOSRPHR(www.iosrphr.org) IOSR Journal of PharmacyIOSRPHR(www.iosrphr.org) IOSR Journal of Pharmacy
IOSRPHR(www.iosrphr.org) IOSR Journal of Pharmacy
iosrphr_editor
 
IOSRPHR(www.iosrphr.org) IOSR Journal of Pharmacy
IOSRPHR(www.iosrphr.org) IOSR Journal of PharmacyIOSRPHR(www.iosrphr.org) IOSR Journal of Pharmacy
IOSRPHR(www.iosrphr.org) IOSR Journal of Pharmacy
iosrphr_editor
 
Potential of Neem Leaf Powder as Bio Adsorbents for Dye Colour Removal
Potential of Neem Leaf Powder as Bio Adsorbents for Dye Colour RemovalPotential of Neem Leaf Powder as Bio Adsorbents for Dye Colour Removal
Potential of Neem Leaf Powder as Bio Adsorbents for Dye Colour Removal
ijtsrd
 

Similar to 128560 Research (20)

11-42-1-PB
11-42-1-PB11-42-1-PB
11-42-1-PB
 
Bundelan piperin
Bundelan piperinBundelan piperin
Bundelan piperin
 
Levels of PAHs and Potentially Toxic Metals in Three Species of Fresh and Smo...
Levels of PAHs and Potentially Toxic Metals in Three Species of Fresh and Smo...Levels of PAHs and Potentially Toxic Metals in Three Species of Fresh and Smo...
Levels of PAHs and Potentially Toxic Metals in Three Species of Fresh and Smo...
 
Dry Ashing
Dry AshingDry Ashing
Dry Ashing
 
EJSR_90_3_03
EJSR_90_3_03EJSR_90_3_03
EJSR_90_3_03
 
Central Lab Unit
Central  Lab  UnitCentral  Lab  Unit
Central Lab Unit
 
Hydrocarbon degrading fungi
Hydrocarbon degrading fungiHydrocarbon degrading fungi
Hydrocarbon degrading fungi
 
Hydrocarbon degrading fungi
Hydrocarbon degrading fungiHydrocarbon degrading fungi
Hydrocarbon degrading fungi
 
Poly Aromatic hydrocarbon degrading fungi
Poly Aromatic hydrocarbon degrading fungiPoly Aromatic hydrocarbon degrading fungi
Poly Aromatic hydrocarbon degrading fungi
 
108552 (rambadagalla)
108552 (rambadagalla)108552 (rambadagalla)
108552 (rambadagalla)
 
Comparison of different extraction methods for the extraction of total phenol...
Comparison of different extraction methods for the extraction of total phenol...Comparison of different extraction methods for the extraction of total phenol...
Comparison of different extraction methods for the extraction of total phenol...
 
27. Biodiversity and business A Presentation By Mr. Allah Dad Khan Visitin...
27. Biodiversity and business  A Presentation By Mr. Allah  Dad Khan  Visitin...27. Biodiversity and business  A Presentation By Mr. Allah  Dad Khan  Visitin...
27. Biodiversity and business A Presentation By Mr. Allah Dad Khan Visitin...
 
Moringa oleifera-vs-stenopetala
Moringa oleifera-vs-stenopetalaMoringa oleifera-vs-stenopetala
Moringa oleifera-vs-stenopetala
 
Phytochemical Analysis of some Macrophytes of Lake Kondakarla, Visakhapatnam ...
Phytochemical Analysis of some Macrophytes of Lake Kondakarla, Visakhapatnam ...Phytochemical Analysis of some Macrophytes of Lake Kondakarla, Visakhapatnam ...
Phytochemical Analysis of some Macrophytes of Lake Kondakarla, Visakhapatnam ...
 
IOSRPHR(www.iosrphr.org) IOSR Journal of Pharmacy
IOSRPHR(www.iosrphr.org) IOSR Journal of PharmacyIOSRPHR(www.iosrphr.org) IOSR Journal of Pharmacy
IOSRPHR(www.iosrphr.org) IOSR Journal of Pharmacy
 
IOSRPHR(www.iosrphr.org) IOSR Journal of Pharmacy
IOSRPHR(www.iosrphr.org) IOSR Journal of PharmacyIOSRPHR(www.iosrphr.org) IOSR Journal of Pharmacy
IOSRPHR(www.iosrphr.org) IOSR Journal of Pharmacy
 
Phytopharmaceuticals - By Dr.U.Srinivasa, Professor and Head, Srinivas coll...
 Phytopharmaceuticals -  By Dr.U.Srinivasa, Professor and Head, Srinivas coll... Phytopharmaceuticals -  By Dr.U.Srinivasa, Professor and Head, Srinivas coll...
Phytopharmaceuticals - By Dr.U.Srinivasa, Professor and Head, Srinivas coll...
 
comparison
comparisoncomparison
comparison
 
Pharmacognosy Simplified
Pharmacognosy SimplifiedPharmacognosy Simplified
Pharmacognosy Simplified
 
Potential of Neem Leaf Powder as Bio Adsorbents for Dye Colour Removal
Potential of Neem Leaf Powder as Bio Adsorbents for Dye Colour RemovalPotential of Neem Leaf Powder as Bio Adsorbents for Dye Colour Removal
Potential of Neem Leaf Powder as Bio Adsorbents for Dye Colour Removal
 

128560 Research

  • 1.
  • 2. Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons to determine best woods for fish smoking P.Anoja1, SSK Madage2*, RGS Wijesekara1, MMNP Gunasekara2 1 Department of Aquaculture and Fisheries , Faculty of Livestock, Fisheries & Nutrition, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka. 2 Food Technology Section, Research and Development Division, Industrial Technology Institute, 363, Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo 7, Sri Lanka. Presented by: P.Anoja (128560)
  • 3.
  • 4. • Smoking – Traditional method of preservation – Modern food industry also use smoking processes to obtain desired flavors in certain products (e.g. ham, bacon, sausage) – Around 2% of the total fish catch is used for preparing smoked fish all over the world (Kashyap.D et al., 2016).
  • 5. • Different types of smoking methods – Hot- smoking – Cold- smoking – Combined method of hot and cold smoking – Liquid smoking – Electrostatic smoking • Smoking has combined effects in preservation – Drying – Salting – Heat treatment – Deposition of components.
  • 6. • Composition of wood smoke is very complex.  Unique flavor and color  Bactericidal properties  Antioxidant properties • Contains hundreds of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons( PAHs). Wood smoke components Desirable components Non-desirable components Carcinogenic effect Mutagenic effect Immune suppressant
  • 7. • Many of them are carcinogenic. • Benzo[a]pyrene (Bap) – Marker of the carcinogenic PAH (Stołyhwo and Sikorski 2005) – Maximum allowable limit in food- 0.031µg/kg in EU • Lack of awareness • So the study will focused to minimize the bad health effect due to smoking of fish.
  • 9. • Research objective – To identify the safe type/s of firewood for generating smoke in fish processing. • Specific objectives – To screen commonly used wood species for PAH content in wood smoke – To optimize the controlled conditions during the production of smoke and extraction of PAHs
  • 11. • Study area: Food Technology Section, Industrial Technology Institute. • Duration : 15 weeks • Basic steps – Selection & Collection of fire woods • Availability • Abundance • Cost
  • 12. Cocos nucifera Borassus flabellifer Cinnamomum verum Mangifera indicaAzadirachta indica Artocarpus heterophyllus Drypetes sepiaria Thespesia populnea Cocos nucifera
  • 13. – Wood preparation & quality analysis • All types of woods with uniform conditions • Quality analysis Moisture analyzer Dry them in uniform conditionCut into same size pieces
  • 14. – Adoption of smoke collecting apparatus A model of the apparatus
  • 15. Distilled water • Dissolve the Smoke except PAH Ash trap Smoker •Controlled conditions •Weight of wood- 1kg •Smoldering time- 1 hour
  • 16. • Selection of organic solvent • Optimization of solvent mixture • Acetonitrile : Acetone : Toluene = 6 : 3 : 1 •Total volume = 150 mL PAH trap • Maintains uniform flow rate, • Facilitate the solubility of components  Ash trap  PAH trap Vacuum pump
  • 17. Pathway of smoke particles Wood chamber Smoke particles Ash free smoke PAH particles
  • 18. – PAHs extract was concentrate up to 50 mL – High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis Rotary evaporator Specific standard stock solution PAH Extract from wood samples
  • 19. • PAH analysis – Instrument: Agilent 1260 Infinity Quaternary Gradient HPLC – Column: Eclipse PAH 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 um – Flow: 2.0 mL/min – Mobile Phase: Gradient Water: AcCN – Detector: Fluorescence Ex/Em 260/352, 260/420, 260/460; UV 230 nm
  • 21. Moisture content of wood samples Samples Moisture content Coconut husk 8.02±0.002 Coconut frond 6.52±0.003 Cinnamon 7.38±0.005 Jak 8.14±0.001 Mango 7.69±0.001 Margosa 8.75±0.006 Palmyrah 9.3±0.001 Portia 9.57±0.003 Weera 9.62±0.003 Moisture used in smoking is less than 10-20%.
  • 22. • Analysis of standard PAH solution using HPLC method Retention times o f peak Identification of PAH compounds Area of peak Quantification of PAH compounds Naphthalene
  • 23. • Identification of PAH compounds Signals Retention time Compounds DAD 7.101 FLD1 A 7.118 FLD1 B ND Napthalene FLD1 C ND FLD1 D ND DAD 8.019 FLD1 A ND FLD1 B ND Acenapthylene FLD1 C ND FLD1 D ND DAD 9.453 FLD1 A 9.471 FLD1 B ND Acenapthene FLD1 C ND FLD1 D ND DAD 9.783 FLD1 A 9.8 FLD1 B ND Fluorene FLD1 C ND FLD1 D ND Sixteen PAHs were identified. DAD- Diode Array Detector FLD- Fluorescence detector A,B,C,D- Different excitation &emission wavelength ND- Not Detected
  • 24. Wood species PAH compounds Coconut frond Napthalene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluorene Palmyrah Naphthalene Benzo (a) anthracene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Benzo (a) pyrene Cinnamon Fluorene Phenanthrene Mango Naphthalene Fluorene Phenanthrene Wood species PAH compounds Jak Naphthalene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Margosa Naphthalene Fluorene Phenanthrene Portia Naphthalene Anthracene Weera Naphthalene Fluorene Phenanthrene Identification of PAH compounds from different wood species
  • 25. • Total quantification of PAHs in wood species 115.51 212.13 14.61 95.31 39.23 93.42 25.75 39.46 63.57 0 50 100 150 200 250Totalquantity(mg/L) Wood samples
  • 26. Classification of Carcinogenic PAHs (US-EPA) Probable carcinogenic PAH Possible carcinogenic PAH Less carcinogenic PAH Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Anthracene Benzo(a) pyrene Benzo(j)fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(e)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene Chrysene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene
  • 27. Quantity of PAH compounds in wood samples 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Naphthalene Acenapthylene Acenapthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Napthalene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluorene Naphthalene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Fluorene Phenanthrene Naphthalene Fluorene Phenanthrene Naphthalene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Naphthalene Fluorene Phenanthrene Naphthalene Anthracene Naphthalene Fluorene Phenanthrene Coconut husk Coconut frond Palmyrah Cinnamon Mango Jak Margosa Portia Weera Quantity(mg/L) Wood samples Napthalene Probable carcinogenic PAHs Less carcinogenic PAHs
  • 28. Summary Wood types Probable carcinogenic PAHs Possible carcinogenic PAHs Less carcinogenic PAHs Coconut husk Coconut frond ND ND Palmyrah Cinnamon ND ND Mango ND ND Jak ND ND Margosa ND ND Weera ND ND Portia ND ND
  • 30. • Naphthalene is most commonly available PAH • Coconut frond has highest amount of PAHs than others. • Most probable carcinogenic PAHs are available in Coconut husk and Palmyrah. • Mango, Margosa and Portia can be selected as safe fire woods among these nine woods
  • 32. • More replication helps to validate the results • Further studies required, – To improve the model of smoke collecting apparatus – To conduct separate studies for each areas with commonly using wood types.
  • 33. Acknowledgements • Department of Aquaculture and Fisheries, Faculty of Livestock Fisheries and Nutrition, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Makandura, Gonawila. • Food Technology Section, Industrial Technology Institute, Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo 07. • Staffs of the Food Technology Section, Industrial Technology Institute, Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo 07.
  • 34. • References – Kashyap. D., Bhuyan.S., Devi.R., and Sharma.P.J.(2016). Smoking Preservative of Fish. Aquatic fish database.[Online] Available from : http://aquafind.com/articles/Smoking_Fish.php [accessed 2016.07.19] – Stołyhwo, A. and Sikorski, Z.E. (2005). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in smoked fish – a critical review. Food Chemistry , 91, pp.303–311.

Editor's Notes

  1. (by poly phenolic compounds)
  2. The effectiveness of this modification was carried out by considering the, Filtration of ash and tar Control of flame Control of smoke temperature Control of smoke density/ mass