Presented at the 2017 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Geographers

1. Looking Good vs. Doing Good
The Rub Between Cartographic Design and
Participatory GIS
Amber J. Bosse
University of Kentucky
Participatory Research in Geography 1: Approaches
April 6th 2017

11. (p. 12)
...

12. (p. 12)
...

13. (p. 41)

15. (p. 64)

16. (p. 122)

17. (p. 118)

18. (p. 304)

19. (p. 12)
...

20. (p. 12)
...

21. ...
(p. 64)

22. (p. 135)
(p. 133)

23. (p. 301)

24. (p. 336)
(p. 339)

27. “People won’t ask for
more if it looks bad”

28. “People won’t ask for
more if it looks bad” “no
one is going to spend 10
minutes looking at this
map”

29. “People won’t ask for
more if it looks bad” “no
one is going to spend 10
minutes looking at this
map” “teach to promote
creativity”

30. more if it looks bad” “no
one is going to spend 10
minutes looking at this
map” “teach to promote
creativity” “Mappers love
to play”

31. map” “teach to promote
creativity” “Mappers love
to play” “an original design
that leverages and
confronts design
guidelines”.

32. map” “teach to promote
creativity” “Mappers love
to play” “an original design
that leverages and
confronts design
guidelines” “beautiful”

33. creativity” “Mappers love
to play” “an original design
that leverages and
confronts design
guidelines” “beautiful”
“ugly”

34. creativity” “Mappers love
to play” “an original design
that leverages and
confronts design
guidelines” “beautiful”
“ugly”

35. to play” “an original design
that leverages and
confronts design
guidelines” “beautiful”
“ugly” style guidelines to
make fashionable maps

39. amber.j.bosse@uky.edu
@mapbosse