2. Paradigma baru adopsi inovasi:
◦ From diffusion to systems of agricultural
innovation.
Alasannya:
1. inovasi teknologi bisa datang dari banyak sumber,
2. ada perubahan dari sustainable agriculture and
progress menuju ecological knowledge system,
3. berkembangnya interdependence model dan
innovation system framework, dimana yang terlibat
tak hanya research and extension, tetap juga
technology users, private companies NGO, dan
supportive structures (pasar dan kredit).
4. pentingnya learning processes ( = a way of evolving
2
3. Transformasi pemikiran ttg penyuluhan dari LAMA ke BARU:
From To
Looking at extension as national
government service
Seeing extension as a set of functions, to be
performed by a variety of players, at different levels
Looking at extension to transfer
technologies
Seeing a wider mandate for extension, that also
includes farmer mobilization, organization and
education
Looking at extension as a
distinct, separate institution
Seeing a coherent, comprehensive knowledge
system for the generation, transfer and uptake of
knowledge and technology, that includes the farmers,
research, extension and education
Using a linear, sequential and
one-directional model of
technology transfer
A more realistic, cyclical and dynamic model of
information exchange and knowledge dissemination
(farmers, researchers, educators and extensionists)
Designing projects from a
teaching perspective, and
budgeting for teaching efforts
Allowing projects to develop a learning mode,
engaging all major stakeholders.
Paying lip service to the
potential of information
technology for rural development
Taking some risks by including experimental
information technologies in projects to link research
institutes, extension managers, farmer organizations
and others to each other and to the rest of the world.
3
4. Rapid Assessment of Agricultural
Knowledge System (RAAKS):
dikembangkan Department for Communication and
Innovation Studies of Wageningen University,
berdasarkan penelitian dan kegiatan di lebih 25
negara di Latin America, Africa, Asia, Europe and
Australia.
Digunakan untuk innovative capacity
development and social learning processes at
the community level among rural organisations and
institutions and, more recently, in agricultural
market chains.
Keunggulannya: a participatory action research
methodology that provides ways for those
involved in complex situations to understand
what is happening and to begin to find answers
for themselves.
4
5. RAAKS methodology:
better known and more accessible to a new
group of potential users in the field on knowledge
management.
a participatory action research methodology and
alternative system
a methodology that has been designed and tested
to help stakeholders gain a better
understanding of their performance as
innovators.
provides a way to improve the generation,
exchange and utilization of knowledge and
information for innovation.
5
6. Why RAAKS?
RAAKS is a participatory action-research methodology
that attempts to provide ways for those involved in such
complex situations to begin to find answers for
themselves.
RAAKS can be used to focus on the present and
potential social organization of actors (groups or
individuals) in a situation where innovation is desirable.
It encourages the team to think about the system you
are in, what you want from it, what it achieves and does
not, and what is needed for improvement.
For whom?
RAAKS is first of all useful to organizations or institutions
who feel pressed to improve their performance with
respect to innovation.
6
7. Ways to use RAAKS:
dapat dipakai oleh field worker, trainer,
manager, researcher, dan consultant.
As a researcher, you can use this method
to develop an understanding of the social
organization of innovation, based on input
from those who are involved; this can be
used as a basis for proposals for action
and/or further analysis.
7
8. RAAKS study has three
objectives:
To identify opportunities to improve a knowledge
and information system - that is, to better the
organization, decision making, and exchange of
information among actors, with the aim of improving the
potential for learning and innovation;
To create awareness among relevant actors (such as
target groups or constituencies, managers,
policymakers, producers, traders, researchers and
extension workers) with respect to the opportunities and
constraints that effect their performance as innovators;
To identify actors and potential actors who do or could
act effectively to remove constraints and take advantage
of opportunities to improve innovative performance and
to encourage their commitment to such changes.
8
10. Judul seminar : .........................................................................................
Hari/Tanggal : .........................................................................................
Pembicara : .........................................................................................
Petunjuk: Berikan tanda ”X” pada jawaban yang Bapak/Ibu pilih. Jawaban 1 = sangat tidak
setuju, jawaban 10 = sangat setuju.
Pernyataan Jawaban
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1. Topik seminar merupakan hal yang
menarik untuk didiskusikan?
2. Topik seminar ini sangat bermanfaat?
3. Pembicara telah menyampaikan materi
secara komunikatif dan efektif?
4. Saya merasa telah memperoleh
manfaat keilmuan yang sangat penting
dan berguna?
5. Topik ini perlu diseminarkan lagi pada
waktu mendatang?
Catatan : ....................................................................................................................
.......................................... ....................................................................................................
****** Terima kasih atas kerjasamanya ******
Lembar Evaluasi Seminar
BPTP ...............................................................................
11. Objek pameran : .........................................................................................
Hari/Tanggal : .........................................................................................
Bentuk media : .........................................................................................
Petunjuk: Berikan tanda ”X” pada jawaban yang Bapak/Ibu pilih. Jawaban 1 = sangat tidak
setuju, jawaban 10 = sangat setuju.
Pernyataan Jawaban
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1. Objek pameran merupakan hal yang
menarik untuk disampaikan ?
2. Objek ini sangat bermanfaat?
3. Media yang digunakan telah
menyampaikan materi secara komunikatif
dan efektif?
4. Saya merasa telah memperoleh
manfaat keilmuan yang sangat penting
dan berguna?
5. Objek ini perlu dipamerkan lagi pada
waktu mendatang?
Lembar Evaluasi PAMERAN
BPTP ...............................................................................
Catatan : ....................................................................................................................
.......................................... ....................................................................................................
****** Terima kasih atas kerjasamanya ******
12. Catatan refleksi untuk kita
semua:
What: apakah yang dikaji dan di diseminasikan
memang paling penting? Apakah teknologi yang dikaji
dan dihasilkan menjerat ataukah membebaskan
petani?
What for: untuk siapa ini semua? Untuk kita, untuk
kantor, atau untuk petani?
Why: mengapa mengkajinya? Apakah menelitinya
merupakan cara yang perlu dan penting?
Who: siapa menjalankan pengkajian? Dengan siapa
dijalankan?
Where: dimana pengkajian dilakukan? Dimana
informasi disebarkan?
How: apakah sudah dijalankan secara interdisiplin?
Adalah dialektika konsep dan data? Dialektika
pengetahuan lokal dan ilmiah? Sudah kah
13. Pidato Yunita T Winarto dalam Academy
Professorship Indonesia In Social
Sciences And Humanities, di UGM,
Tahun 2007.
“Insan akademis seyogianya memiliki
sikap kerendahhatian, itulah bekal
utama dalam melahirkan gagasan dan
rancangan. ….. mengakui
keterbatasan, itulah yang sejatinya
merupakan langkah awal
pengembangan ilmu. Dari situlah
keingintahuan yang besar dapat tumbuh-
kembang dengan subur”.
14. TERIMA KASIH atas perhatian,
Mohon maaf atas kesalahan,
Minal aidin wal waidzin