1. Internet Usage 1
Running Head: INTERNET USAGE AT SCHOOL
Internet Usage at School – The Challenges of a Web 2.0 World
Mary “Nicole” Bennett Wingate
Georgia Southern University
FRIT 7132

2. Internet Usage 2
Abstract
This paper focuses on the obstacles and challenges created by the Web 2.0 World. It addresses
Internet filters and Acceptable Use Policies when determining the best way to educate students in
a technology centered world. The paper suggests teachers embrace the opportunities created
through new technology, rather than banning it for fear of inappropriate use.

3. Internet Usage 3
The look and focus of today’s media center is drastically different from the media center
during the Leave it to Beaver era. Years ago, students went to the media center to check out
books, find resource information from encyclopedias, or read in a cozy corner. Today, students
visit the media center to print out their research papers, use Galileo to find information on their
research topic, or use Internet sites to prepare for tests; or at least that’s what we, educators, want
our students to visit the media center for. All too often though we catch students finding a
“backdoor” into MYSPACE, or playing an online hunting game when they still have three pages
of a research paper to complete that, by the way, is due the next day. With all of the
opportunities the Internet has provided for education, it has definitely created some roadblocks as
well. So, how do we overcome these roadblocks to ensure our students are receiving the
technology-focused education they need, without distracting or endangering themselves? And
more importantly, how do we tell the difference between an “opportunity” and a “roadblock”?
The all too common answer to this Internet usage issue has become the installation and
use of an Internet filter. Internet filters can be used to block inappropriate or unwanted sites off
of school computers and thereby gives educators more control over what students can access
from a federally funded school computer. However, there are issues. First off, there are sites
that help students get around these school filters. As Doug Johnson states in his article “Rules
for the Social Web” (2007), “Do you know about SchoolBoredom.com? Trust me; your kids do
– and they use it and other blocker-busting sites” (p. 11). Websites like SchoolBoredom.com
allow students access to sites that are typically blocked on school computers. Therefore, when a
student uses a “backdoor” site such as this, the effectiveness of the Internet filter is greatly
reduced. And not only are Internet filters easy to “hack,” they also have problems with the
materials they do sensor. Filters come with a setting that allows the user to determine how

4. Internet Usage 4
restrictive they are in allowing site access. A common misconception is that the more restrictive
the filters are, the safer the Internet experience becomes for the student. However, filters that are
set at levels that are too restrictive not only restrict the inappropriate sites students are allowed to
access, but they often times restrict the educationally sound sites as well. For example, students
at my school are commonly asked to include pictures in their presentations. One particular
example I remember was when the Spanish students were asked to find pictures of common
household furniture and label them in Spanish. However, any image search on Google was
blocked by the Internet filter. The students therefore had a harder time finding images to use on
their poster boards. In this case, the Internet filter actually hinders the educational process rather
than making it safer.
A second “answer” to the Internet usage issue that often accompanies these Internet
filters is an Acceptable Use Policy (AUP). Students are commonly presented with these on the
first day of school. The policy outlines acceptable use of computers, technology, and the Internet
while on campus. Students are asked to sign the policy, have a parent sign it, and return it to
school administration. However, students often forget to have these policies signed, and as a
result, are not allowed to access the Internet. So how does a teacher conduct Internet research in
the library when half of her class is not allowed to use the computer? This issue is addressed by
Judi Repman when she states (2008), “I noticed that the media specialist was doing searches in
the OPAC and GALILEO for some students and handing them the print outs…When I asked
why I was told that she had to do this for students who didn’t have a signed AUP” (par. 2). Is
this really supplying students with the technology-based education that they deserve? Simply
because a student forgets to have a paper signed, he or she is denied the right to learn and
practice the information literacy skills crucial for success in today’s world. Though this poses a

5. Internet Usage 5
fundamental problem for educators, Acceptable Use Policies are not only problematic when they
are not signed and returned by students. As Dr. Repman points out, they are often outdated.
And as Doug Johnson points out, their language is often times broad and open to interpretation.
So even when AUPs are appropriately completed and returned to school administrators, they are
problematic. Therefore, Acceptable Use Policies are not the “answer” to the Internet usage
dilemma.
And one final issue that is affected by both the Internet filters and a school’s Acceptable
Use Policy is email. Often times students are not allowed to check their emails at school, and if
they are, it has to be under direct supervision of a teacher. This “supervision” issue has created
some schools to designate particular computers as “email access” computers, as is the case in
Mrs. Hamilton and Mrs. Fleet’s media center. In their recent blog, they state (2008), “If you
have forgotten your flash drive and have an email emergency, please see Mrs. Hamilton or Mrs.
Fleet – you may use Station 21 to get homework or essays off email…Be aware, though, that
some of the student profile restrictions may disable you from downloading attached files” (par.
1-2). So even when students can access their email, other acceptable use restrictions prohibit
them from downloading attachments. Email access is not the only Internet asset being blocked,
sites likes MySpace and Facebook are also blacklisted, despite the advantages these networking
tools could provide for education. At my former school, though email was not outlawed in the
AUP, all major email providers were blocked. When students were working on their research
papers, I commonly had to open my email on ten to fifteen student computers to email rough
drafts from school computers to students’ emails. Students could then make changes and work
on their papers at home. Then, if they needed to open their papers from email at school, they
would have to email their papers to my school account. This entire process was faulty and time

6. Internet Usage 6
consuming. Instead of spending time during the class period assisting students with sentence
structure or reliable source questions, I was spending half of the class period emailing papers,
just as Mrs. Hamilton and Mrs. Fleet are forced to spend their time supervising student email in
the media center. There has to be a better answer!
So what is it? How do we provide students with a safe and productive Internet
environment? By making sensible decisions and creating sensible policies concerning the
Internet and technology in general. Though the Internet filters create some problems, these
problems could be drastically reduced by heightened teacher monitoring while using less
restrictive filtering levels. Doug Johnson also believes this approach is best , which is proven
when he states (2007), “…we would install a filter, but it would be set at its least restrictive
setting…Adults monitor student access to the Internet as if no filter were present” (p. 12). This
change would also create a higher-sense of responsibility for student users, and we all know
when more is expected of students, more is produced by them. These less restrictive Internet
filters could work with updated and precise Acceptable Use Policies that explicitly state what is
expected of students. Also, encouraging students to bring back AUPs by offering incentives to
those who do, like entry into a raffle for a free IPOD, would definitely be more productive than
just threatening students who don’t return signed AUPs. And finally, email could be provided
through the school system. Include in the AUP that email should be appropriate, and place
responsibility on the students to use it appropriately. No, I know everyone won’t follow the
rules, but a certain sense of pride and expectancy comes with being trusted to have your own
school email, and the students will respond to that.
So ultimately, educators simply need to refine what they are already doing. Though the
original Internet usage policies and strategies were created with good intentions, somewhere

7. Internet Usage 7
along the way, they lost their effectiveness. Web 2.0 tools are there, and students use them
outside of school. It should ultimately be every educator’s goal to implement these exciting and
innovative new tools into classroom curriculum. Why not let a student create a blog entry
instead of a journal entry if she feels more comfortable doing that? With technology, the
possibilities are endless! If used appropriately, both at school and at home, technology will
expand our students’ knowledge and provide countless opportunities rather than creating a
roadblock to their success.

8. Internet Usage 8
References
Fleet and Hamilton. (2008). Do You Have the Email Blues? Retrieved November 29, 2008,
from: http://theunquietlibrary.wordpress.com/2008/03/17/do-you-have-the-email-blues/
Johnson, Doug. (2007). Rules for the Social Web. Threshold, Summer 2007, 9-12.
Repman, Judi. (2008). Acceptable Use Policies in the 21st Century. Retrieved November 29,
2008, from:
http://glma.wordpress.com/2008/01/18/acceptable-use-policies-in-the-21st-century/