• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Designers and-geeks 2012-presentation_0.2
 

Designers and-geeks 2012-presentation_0.2

on

  • 8,267 views

Video: youtube.com/watch?v=eN05B7dDsFY Picture a world where Amazon.com is a factory. Products are made in small quantities, as needed, based on direct input from users to designers and developers. ...

Video: youtube.com/watch?v=eN05B7dDsFY Picture a world where Amazon.com is a factory. Products are made in small quantities, as needed, based on direct input from users to designers and developers. Consumption directly drives product creation, and data informs design. Consumer products are made locally, with local materials and workers, while at the same time using design and engineering talent from anywhere on earth. It simultaneously looks exactly like our world, but is totally different. It’s almost here, and you know more about it than anyone else.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
8,267
Views on SlideShare
1,293
Embed Views
6,974

Actions

Likes
3
Downloads
10
Comments
0

13 Embeds 6,974

http://www.orangecone.com 4945
http://orangecone.com 1988
http://abtasty.com 15
http://www.orangecone.com. 6
http://translate.googleusercontent.com 5
https://www.google.com 4
https://twitter.com 4
http://10.70.168.173 2
http://nsuys 1
http://www.linkedin.com 1
http://www.google.com 1
http://prlog.ru 1
http://orangecone.com.netzcheck.com 1
More...

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Thank you Joe for inviting me tonight. As soon as I saw your logo, I knew I had to participate.
  • First, let me tell you a bit about my background. I ’m a user experience designer. I was one of the first professional Web designers in 1993, where I was lucky enough to be present for the birth of such things as the online shopping cart and the search engine. This is the navigation for a hot sauce shopping site I designed in 1994.
  • I’m proud of the fact that 16 years later they were still using the same visual identity. These were some of the oldest pixels on the Web.
  • Here’s one of my UI designs for the advanced search for HotBot, an early search engine, from 1997. If you’re wondering why Google’s front page is no minimal, I think it was because we were doing this.
  • Since then I’ve consulted on the user experience design of dozens, maybe hundreds of web sites. Here’s one for credit.com, who were fantastic clients a couple of years ago.
  • I sat out the first dotcom crash writing a book based on the work I had been doing. It ’s a cookbook of user research methods. It came out in 2003 and the second edition just came out last month. Buy a copy for everyone on your team!
  • And 2001 I co-founded a design and consulting company called Adaptive Path.
  • I left the Web behind in 2004 and founded a company with Tod E. Kurt called ThingM in 2006.
  • ThingM is a micro-OEM and an R&D lab. We design and manufacture a range of smart LEDs for architects, industrial designers and hackers. Our products appear on everything from flying robots to Lady Gaga’s stage show. This is an RFID wine rack that we did about four years ago. The different light colors represent different facets of information that’s pulled down from a cloud-based service, such as current market price. This is a capacitive sensing kitchen cabinet knob we did two years ago. It glows when you touch it to creates a little bit of magic in your everyday environment and was an exploration in making a digital product that would still be useful 20 years after it was made.
  • In 2010 I wrote a book on the user experience design of ubiquitous computing devices, which I define as things that do information processing and networking, but are not experienced as general purpose computing or communication devices.
  • I also organize an annual summit of people developing hardware design tools for non-engineers.
  • However, ThingM, books and conferences are not my day job. They’re entertaining sidelines. My primary day job is as an innovation and user experience design consultant focusing on the design of digital consumer products. Here are some I’ve worked on for Yamaha, Whirlpool and Qualcomm.
  • The last couple of years my clients have been large consumer electronics companies. I’ve worked with them to design new products and services and to help them create more user centered and company cultures. I can’t give you any details, but I’ll tell you that big data analytics, real-time image recognition, distributed processing, and machine learning are pretty awesome.
  • This spring I finally got to do a project I can talk about. I worked with Sifteo, the game company, to design all of the non-game UX of their second generation platform. It was a great project. Stock up on these for Christmas.
  • Let me start with a little history of manufacturing efficiency. Now this is only barely history, since I’m not a historian, but I’ve been reading about the history of technology for a couple of years and I came up with this model for understanding several trends in manufacturing, and I think it has some face validity. If you look at how many things you could produce from one unit of work, you see an interesting curve. For most of the last ten thousand or however many years, when you put one unit of work into a project, you got roughly one thing out of it. I realize “a unit of work” is somewhat imprecise, but bear with me. During this period you see some gains in efficiency through tools like the potter’s wheel, the plow, the horse, the lever, fire, but those efficiencies were, roughly speaking linear. No one had the capability to make 10,000 cooking pots in a day. Then this thing happens. James Watt’s patent on the improvement to Newcomen’s steam engine expires in 1800. Boom. The Industrial Revolution. Exponential growth in the efficiency of production. 10,000 cooking pots a day is easy. That’s followed by steady increases in efficiency until we get to today’s industrial society. OK, that’s fairly familiar. Now, let’s look at a related curve, the number of units of work to make the FIRST thing. Making the first thing of any set is hard. You become efficient later on, but the first time is not efficient. For most of history, that’s about one unit of work. And the funny thing about the Industrial Revolution is that as it made it much easier to make many things, it made it much harder to make that first thing. Mass produced objects are really complex, they require you to make the tools that make the tools that make the end product. It’s no longer a process that a single person, or even a small workshop, can even afford to do time, money, or knowlege-wise. It requires a lot of expertise to be acquired and then consolidated into a single geographic location. Here is our familiar experience of manufactured products: pick nearly everything you own or see and it’s almost impossibly complex for you to make one. And then this other thing happens. In October 2009 Stratasys’ core patent on computer controlled additive manufacturing expires. Boom. The cost of making the first thing starts to plummet while the cost of making lots of things stays the same. The relationship between these two trends is what makes what I’m about to tell you about possible.
  • That’s where this comes from.
  • Imagine Amazon 8 years from now. It looks like this. Yes, it looks exactly like the Amazon today. It has all of the familiar ways to discover new products, to compare them, to see what people think of them, to see what goes with what. It has wish lists, Gold Boxes, the whole thing. But there’s a crucial difference. Instead of Amazon being the front end to a fulfillment system, as it is today, the Amazon of 2020 is the front end to a set of factories.
  • The back end doesn’t look like UPS, but Ford Motor Company. When you click on on buy you start a manufacturing process at the factory nearest you, instead of a delivery process from a warehouse far away. River Rouge photo by Lotus Carroll, creative commons http://www.flickr.com/photos/thelotuscarroll/6695794423/
  • I know what you’re thinking: “Mike just saw a MakerBot and got all excited. We’ve heard this all before, it’s called mass customization, and it’s never worked out.” Why talk about this again? Because I think that the presentation of mass customization as “configurators for everything” (such as this 1998 project from Levi’s) missed the point. That totally gets the user motivation wrong: most people don’t want to be designers of everything, they want to design a couple of things, but be consumers of the rest. Some people want to make their own clothes, but those people typically don’t build their own cars, and vice versa. Most people have better things to do than figure out what colors and patterns look good together, what makes them look sexy or powerful, how much firmware will fit into the onboard memory. They’re busy. They want someone who is a professional to do that research, to think really hard about what they need, to be really fluent in the tools that make it good, then to create a solution.
  • I’m also not talking about desktop manufacturing. As much as all us geeks want a Star Trek replicator, it’s not that useful in practice. We just don’t need that much new stuff all the time. Paper printers are useful because they represent high density information that fits into a rich existing culture of information use, and even they’re not used nearly as much as ecommerce sites. Outside of work, people probably shop a lot more than they print.
  • I think more importantly, both mass customization and desktop fabrication imagine a new world that’s different than ours. I have nothing against envisioning new worlds and working toward their creation—that’s one of the things I do for my clients—but my experience has taught me that creating new worlds, changing the behavior of millions of people, is really hard and takes a really long time. If we look to a world 8 years into the future, odds are that it’s not going to have changed that much, the odds are that most of us are not going to have a whole bunch more time on our hands to become mechanical engineers, electrical engineers, software engineers, and material scientists, as much as we’d like to. Makerbot photo by Scott Beale
  • 2020 will actually probably look and works exactly like our world today, when seen from the outside. It’ll still be driven by the thrill of finding something awesome when you’re bored surfing the Internet and then making it yours by buying it. The relationship between the consumer and designer will remain intact. Designers still design, ecommerce sites still help people find stuff they like, people still buy.
  • However, there will be a crucial difference behind the scenes, and it will be this difference that changes our world from one of centralized warehouses to a world of distributed factories.
  • The difference is analytics. When you order from the Amazon of 2020 a counter is incremented that registers that you, a human being with a set of well-known behaviors and a demographic background, decided to buy this specific version of this specific idea. Moreover, since the world of 2020 is a world of ubiquitous computing, every product has a small bit of digital hardware in it that tracks how the product is used and, with your implicit permission, sends that information back to a central server, which aggregates and anonymizes the results. This is of course exactly how large-scale Web design works, but now we will map it to all products.
  • When you have rapid, cheap, distributed low-volume manufacturing capability AND real-time analytics you have a new way of designing products. You can take those Industrial Age design processes that took years to test hypotheses, and you can speed them up by orders of magnitude. Image: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tailfins-evolution-1957-1959.jpg
  • Tight loop iteration between an idea and market validation of that idea is the core of Eric Ries’ Lean Startup approach. This is a slide from Steve Blank, who is the patron saint of Lean Startup, that illustrates this basic idea. My vision--MY hypothesis--is that it’s possible to do this with ANYTHING by applying the ideas, practices and technologies we developed for the Net to everything else.
  • Let’s start by assuming we have low volume digital manufacturing, such as this Form1 printer that just got funded through Kickstarter. We know that’s coming.
  • The next piece is hypothesis testing. How do you validate your idea without investing a lot in manufacturing? Well, that component is also coming online. Even though they sometimes deny it, Kickstarter is a catalog for products that don't exist yet. It gives developers feedback about the popularity of their idea and teaches them how to position it for a market before they’ve made a single final product. It provides two kinds of hypothesis testing: do people even want your idea? and what do they say they want it for?
  • Etsy allows very small run electronic products (as long as they’re made of felt).
  • Even fab.com, which sells limited-edition high design products like rugs and backpacks, sells small run electronics.
  • Here’s a new store opening on Valencia in about a month called Dijital Fix. They are a New York-based boutique specializing in limited-run electronics. These channels are immature, but they’re becoming increasingly popular. In effect, they’re doing an end run around the traditional consumer electronic sales channels--at the same time that Dijital Fix is opening new stores Best Buy is struggling—and giving developers direct access to their customers so they can test their product hypotheses directly. This is bringing product development closer to what we’ve become accustomed to when deploying software on the Web.
  • The key missing piece we still need to borrow from software is distributed collaborative design tools. To make better hypotheses we need to be able to take advantage of all of those specialized skills—all the different kinds of engineering—wherever they are, and to work together to create a shared understanding of what that hypothesis, that product, is. For purely digital products we have Github, Basecamp, WebEx, Balsamiq and similar products, but the physical world is way behind. Commercial CAD systems are huge and incredibly difficult to learn. Product Lifecycle Management systems assume that you’re always building a commercial airplane, and are also insanely complex.
  • We are getting new tools, Autodesk’s 123D, Ponoko has publishing tools, you can kind of fork projects on Thingiverse. But these tools are really immature. Sunglass just pivoted a couple of weeks ago from being an online CAD system to being a “ Github for 3D. ” When these products mature, this is going to open creative possibilities immensely. But it’s going to take time. Github got to where it is through an evolution of tools and practices that began with makefiles. The physical world isn’t even at the makefile stage.
  • To me, the whole ecosystem looks like this. Here come the buzz words, so excuse me in advance. Digital fabrication, we know what that is. It will allow us to make all kinds of things in small batches. Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things is leading to everyday objects that send a stream of telemetry when we bring them home. They have an information shadow in the cloud that can be data mined. Big Data Analytics crunches all of that data to create information about people’s behavior. Social commerce creates sales channels that sell small numbers of products by finding niche markets and letting them market to each other And finally, cloud-based design tools will allow designers and engineers to collaborate on the distributed development of physical products. This is my ecosystem vision: a world where design directly drives product creation, and where data informs design. This is a world where products are made in small numbers only when they are requested. They are made locally, with local materials and workers, while at the same time being able to use design and engineering talent from anywhere on earth. In other words, they use the best qualities of both atoms and bits: atoms are available everywhere, bits travel fast. Designers in this vision add hypotheses testing against the actual market to their toolbox of design methods. In the full pipe dream, this means we use fewer natural resources, take full advantage of talented people wherever they are, create only products in large quantities that people need and want, meet the needs of tiny niche audiences, while still taking advantage of the infinite variety implicit in digital manufacturing technologies. Whew!
  • I intend to make this vision my next focus as a designer and entrepreneur. At ThingM we just did the first iteration on Kickstarter of a product we hope will become different and more interesting as we iterate on it. It’s the world’s best indicator light. It’s a highly configurable USB LED and it gives you peripheral awareness of things that are happening on the Net and your local machine. You can pre-order one from us today. However, I don’t expect that we will be able to do all of this by ourselves. I need your help: tell me what I don’t know, where I’m wrong. Tell me who I should talk to and where the opportunities are. I think this will change the world. I want to change the world. Interested? Talk to me.
  • Thank you.

Designers and-geeks 2012-presentation_0.2 Designers and-geeks 2012-presentation_0.2 Presentation Transcript

  • THE NEW PRODUCTDEVELOPMENT ECOSYSTEMHOW DESIGN WILL REINVENTMANUFACTURING Mike Kuniavsky October 18, 2012 Designers and Geeks SF
  • First, let me tell you a bit about my background.I’m a user experience designer. I was one of thefirst professional Web designers in 1993, where Iwas lucky enough to be present for the birth ofsuch things as the online shopping cart and thesearch engine. This is the navigation for a hotsauce shopping site I designed in 1994.
  • I’m proud of the fact that 16 years laterthey were still using the same visualidentity. These were some of the oldestpixels on the Web.
  • Here’s one of my UI designsfor the advanced search forHotBot, an early searchengine, from 1997. If you’rewondering why Google’sfront page is no minimal, Ithink it was because we weredoing this.
  • Since then I’ve consulted onthe user experience design ofdozens, maybe hundreds ofweb sites. Here’s one forcredit.com, who werefantastic clients a couple ofyears ago.
  • I sat out the first dotcom crashwriting a book based on the work Ihad been doing. It’s a cookbook ofuser research methods. It came outin 2003 and the second edition justcame out last month. Buy a copy foreveryone on your team!
  • And 2001 I co-founded a design andconsulting company called AdaptivePath.
  • I left the Web behind in2004 and founded acompany with Tod E. Kurtcalled ThingM in 2006.
  • ThingM is a micro-OEM and an R&D lab. We design andmanufacture a range of smart LEDs for architects, industrialdesigners and hackers. Our products appear on everything fromflying robots to Lady Gaga’s stage show. This is an RFID winerack that we did about four years ago. The different light colorsrepresent different facets of information that’s pulled down from acloud-based service, such as current market price. This is acapacitive sensing kitchen cabinet knob we did two years ago. Itglows when you touch it to creates a little bit of magic in youreveryday environment and was an exploration in making a digitalproduct that would still be useful 20 years after it was made.
  • In 2010 I wrote a book on the userexperience design of ubiquitouscomputing devices, which I define asthings that do information processingand networking, but are notexperienced as general purposecomputing or communicationdevices.
  • I also organize anannual summit ofpeople developinghardware design toolsfor non-engineers.
  • However, ThingM, books andconferences are not my day job.They’re entertaining sidelines. Myprimary day job is as aninnovation and user experiencedesign consultant focusing on thedesign of digital consumerproducts. Here are some I’veworked on for Yamaha, Whirlpooland Qualcomm.
  • The last couple of years myclients have been largeconsumer electronicscompanies. I’ve workedwith them to design newproducts and services andto help them create moreuser centered and companycultures. I can’t give youany details, but I’ll tell youthat big data analytics, real-time image recognition,distributed processing, andmachine learning are prettyawesome.
  • This spring I finally got to do a project Ican talk about. I worked with Sifteo, thegame company, to design all of the non-game UX of their second generationplatform. It was a great project. Stock upon these for Christmas.
  • PROLOGUE: UNITS OF WORK
  • Let me start with a little history of manufacturing efficiency. Now this is only barely history, since I’m not a historian, butI’ve been reading about the history of technology for a couple of years and I came up with this model for understandingseveral trends in manufacturing, and I think it has some face validity.If you look at how many things you could produce from one unit of work, you see an interesting curve. For most of the last ten # of things from 1 unit of workthousand or however many years, when you put one unit of work into a project, you got roughly one thing out of it. I realize etc“a unit of work” is somewhat imprecise, but bear with me. During this period you see some gains in efficiency through toolslike the potter’s wheel, the plow, the horse, the lever, fire, but those efficiencies were, roughly speaking linear. No one hadthe capability to make 10,000 cooking pots in a day. Then this thing happens. James Watt’s patent on the improvement toNewcomen’s steam engine expires in 1800. Boom. The Industrial Revolution. Exponential growth in the efficiency of 10Kproduction. 10,000 cooking pots a day is easy. That’s followed by steady increases in efficiency until we get to today’sindustrial society.OK, that’s fairly familiar. Now, let’s look at a related curve, the number of units of work to make the FIRST thing. Making 1000the first thing of any set is hard. You become efficient later on, but the first time is not efficient. For most of history, that’sabout one unit of work. And the funny thing about the Industrial Revolution is that as it made it much easier to make manythings, it made it much harder to make that first thing. Mass produced objects are really complex, they require you to make 100the tools that make the tools that make the end product. It’s no longer a process that a single person, or even a smallworkshop, can even afford to do time, money, or knowlege-wise. It requires a lot of expertise to be acquired and thenconsolidated into a single geographic location. Here is our familiar experience of manufactured products: pick nearlyeverything you own or see and it’s almost impossibly complex for you to make one. 10And then this other thing happens. In October 2009 Stratasys’ core patent on computer controlled additive manufacturingexpires. Boom. The cost of making the first thing starts to plummet while the cost of making lots of things stays the same. 1The relationship between these two trends is what makes what I’m about to tell you about possible. # units of work to make the first thing 1800 Watt’s patent expires Anitquity patent expires 2009 y Toda Stratasys
  • That’s where this comes from.THE NEW PRODUCTDEVELOPMENT ECOSYSTEM
  • AMAZON 2020Imagine Amazon 8 years from now. It lookslike this. Yes, it looks exactly like theAmazon today. It has all of the familiar waysto discover new products, to compare them,to see what people think of them, to see whatgoes with what. It has wish lists, Gold Boxes,the whole thing. But there’s a crucialdifference. Instead of Amazon being the frontend to a fulfillment system, as it is today, theAmazon of 2020 is the front end to a set offactories.
  • The back end doesn’t look like UPS, but Ford MotorCompany. When you click on on buy you start amanufacturing process at the factory nearest you,instead of a delivery process from a warehouse faraway.
  • I know what you’re thinking: “Mike just saw a MakerBot and got allexcited. We’ve heard this all before, it’s called mass customization, andit’s never worked out.” Why talk about this again? Because I think that thepresentation of mass customization as “configurators for everything” (suchas this 1998 project from Levi’s) missed the point. That totally gets theuser motivation wrong: most people don’t want to be designers ofeverything, they want to design a couple of things, but be consumers of therest. Some people want to make their own clothes, but those peopletypically don’t build their own cars, and vice versa. Most people havebetter things to do than figure out what colors and patterns look goodtogether, what makes them look sexy or powerful, how much firmware willfit into the onboard memory. They’re busy. They want someone who is a MASS CUSTOMIZATION ISprofessional to do that research, to think really hard about what they need,to be really fluent in the tools that make it good, then to create a solution. SO 1996!
  • I’m also not talking about desktop manufacturing. As much as all us geeks want a Star Trek replicator, it’s not that useful in practice. We just don’t need that much new stuff all the time. Paper printers are useful because they represent high density information that fits into a rich existing culture of information use, and even they’re not used nearly as much as ecommerce sites. Outside of work, people probably shop a lot more than they print.COPY SHOPS FOR 3D ANDDESKTOP MANUFACTURING?
  • I think more importantly, both mass customization and2020? fabrication imagine a new world that’s different desktop than ours. I have nothing against envisioning new worlds and working toward their creation—that’s one of the things I do for my clients—but my experience has taught me that creating new worlds, changing the behavior of millions of people, is really hard and takes a really long time. If we look to a world 8 years into the future, odds are that it’s not going to have changed that much, the odds are that most of us are not going to have a whole bunch more time on our hands to become mechanical engineers, electrical engineers, software engineers, and material scientists, as much as we’d like to.Makerbot photo by Scott Beale
  • 20202020 will actually probably look and worksexactly like our world today, when seenfrom the outside. It’ll still be driven by thethrill of finding something awesome whenyou’re bored surfing the Internet and thenmaking it yours by buying it. Therelationship between the consumer anddesigner will remain intact. Designers stilldesign, ecommerce sites still help peoplefind stuff they like, people still buy.
  • However, there will be a crucialdifference behind the scenes, andit will be this difference thatchanges our world from one ofcentralized warehouses to aworld of distributed factories.
  • ANALYTICS The difference is analytics. When you order from the Amazon of 2020 a counter is incremented that registers that you, a human being with a set of well-known behaviors and a demographic background, decided to buy this specific version of this specific idea. Moreover, since the world of 2020 is a world of ubiquitous computing, every product has a small bit of digital hardware in it that tracks how the product is used and, with your implicit permission, sends that information back to a central server, which aggregates and anonymizes the results. This is of course exactly how large-scale Web design works, but now we will map it to all products.
  • FEEDBACK LOOPS When you have rapid, cheap, distributed low- volume manufacturing capability AND real- time analytics you have a new way of designing 1957 products. You can take those Industrial Age design processes that took years to test hypotheses, and you can speed them up by orders of magnitude. 1958 Image: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tailfin s-evolution-1957-1959.jpg 1959
  • Tight loop iteration between an idea andBlank’s Customer discovery market validation of that idea is the core of Eric Ries’ Lean Startup approach. This is a slide from Steve Blank, who is the patron saint of Lean Startup, that illustrates this basic idea. My vision--MY hypothesis--is that it’s possible to do this with ANYTHING by applying the ideas, practices and technologies we developed for the Net to everything else.
  • LOW Volume MANUFACTURING and Assembly Let’s start by assuming we have low volume digital manufacturing, such as this Form1 printer that just got funded through Kickstarter. We know that’s coming.
  • LOW VOLUME piece is hypothesis testing. How do you The next SOCIAL COMMERCE validate your idea without investing a lot in manufacturing? Well, that component is also coming online. Even though they sometimes deny it, Kickstarter is a catalog for products that dont exist yet. It gives developers feedback about the popularity of their idea and teaches them how to position it for a market before they’ve made a single final product. It provides two kinds of hypothesis testing: do people even want your idea? and what do they say they want it for?
  • LOW VOLUME SOCIAL COMMERCE Etsy allows very small run electronic products (as long as they’re made of felt).
  • LOW VOLUME SOCIAL COMMERCE Even fab.com, which sells limited-edition high design products like rugs and backpacks, sells small run electronics.
  • LoW volume social commerceHere’s a new store opening on Valencia in about a month called DijitalFix. They are a New York-based boutique specializing in limited-runelectronics.These channels are immature, but they’re becoming increasinglypopular. In effect, they’re doing an end run around the traditionalconsumer electronic sales channels--at the same time that Dijital Fix isopening new stores Best Buy is struggling—and giving developersdirect access to their customers so they can test their producthypotheses directly.This is bringing product development closer to what we’ve becomeaccustomed to when deploying software on the Web.
  • COLLABORATIVE DESIGN TOOLSThe key missing piece we still need to borrow from software isdistributed collaborative design tools. To make better hypotheseswe need to be able to take advantage of all of those specializedskills—all the different kinds of engineering—wherever they are,and to work together to create a shared understanding of what thathypothesis, that product, is.For purely digital products we have Github, Basecamp, WebEx,Balsamiq and similar products, but the physical world is waybehind. Commercial CAD systems are huge and incrediblydifficult to learn. Product Lifecycle Management systems assumethat you’re always building a commercial airplane, and are alsoinsanely complex.
  • COLLABORATIVE DESIGN TOOLSWe are getting new tools, Autodesk’s 123D, Ponoko haspublishing tools, you can kind of fork projects on Thingiverse.But these tools are really immature.Sunglass just pivoted a couple of weeks ago from being an onlineCAD system to being a “Github for 3D.” When these productsmature, this is going to open creative possibilities immensely.But it’s going to take time. Github got to where it is through anevolution of tools and practices that began with makefiles. Thephysical world isn’t even at the makefile stage.
  • To me, the whole ecosystem looks like this. Here come the buzz words, so excuse me in advance.•Digital fabrication, we know what that is. It will allow us to make all kinds of things in small batches. DIGITAL FABRICATION•Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things is leading to everyday objects that send a stream of telemetry when we bring them home.They have an information shadow in the cloud that can be data mined. +•Big Data Analytics crunches all of that data to create information about people’s behavior.•Social commerce creates sales channels that sell small numbers of products by finding niche markets and letting them market to each other•And finally, cloud-based design tools will allow designers and engineers to collaborate on the distributed development of physical products. UBICOMP/IOTThis is my ecosystem vision: a world where design directly drives product creation, and where data informs design. This is a world whereproducts are made in small numbers only when they are requested. They are made locally, with local materials and workers, while at the same +time being able to use design and engineering talent from anywhere on earth. In other words, they use the best qualities of both atoms and bits:atoms are available everywhere, bits travel fast. Designers in this vision add hypotheses testing against the actual market to their toolbox ofdesign methods. BIG DATA ANALYTICSIn the full pipe dream, this means we use fewer natural resources, take full advantage of talented people wherever they are, create only products +in large quantities that people need and want, meet the needs of tiny niche audiences, while still taking advantage of the infinite variety implicitin digital manufacturing technologies. Whew! SOCIAL COMMERCE + CLOUD-BASED DESIGN TOOLS = THE NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT ECOSYSTEM
  • I intend to make this vision my next focus as a designer and CONCLUSIONentrepreneur. At ThingM we just did the first iteration on Kickstarterof a product we hope will become different and more interesting aswe iterate on it. It’s the world’s best indicator light. It’s a highlyconfigurable USB LED and it gives you peripheral awareness ofthings that are happening on the Net and your local machine. Youcan pre-order one from us today.However, I don’t expect that we will be able to do all of this byourselves.I need your help: tell me what I don’t know, where I’m wrong. Tellme who I should talk to and where the opportunities are.I think this will change the world. I want to change the world. Pre-order at shop.thingm.comInterested? Talk to me.
  • Mike Kuniavskymikek@thingm.com