Flat classroom Project 10-1 awards

  • 851 views
Uploaded on

The culmination of the Flat Classroom Project 10-1 on April 13, 2010. Students, teachers, judges and advisors gathered in Elluminate to celebrate the award winning multimedia. …

The culmination of the Flat Classroom Project 10-1 on April 13, 2010. Students, teachers, judges and advisors gathered in Elluminate to celebrate the award winning multimedia.
All details on the wiki at http://flatclassroom10-1.flatclassroomproject.org/Awards

More in: Education
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
851
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
1

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Flat Classroom Project10-1
    AWARDS CEREMONY
    April 13, 2010
    Flat Classroom ™ Co-founded by Vicki Davis and Julie Lindsay
  • 2. Welcome
    - Julie Lindsay
    http://flatclassroom10-1.flatclassroomproject.org
    http://flatclassroomproject.ning.com
  • 3. Participating Schools
  • 4. Judges Awards
    Given by the expert judges aggregating their scores
    These awards go to the best multimedia works.
    See Rubrics for details about
    Criterion A: Design and Technical Quality and
    Criterion B: Synthesis and Construction of Ideas
    http://flatclassroom10-1.flatclassroomproject.org/Rubrics
    All Awards can be found at
    http://flatclassroom10-1.flatclassroomproject.org/Awards
  • 5. Group 1Connecting the World Online
    Judged by Thompson, Gates, Alberti
    First: 1.D.3 Connecting the World Online Larissa P., SPA, USA
    Second: 1.B.2 Journey Of The MePhone By Cole J, TS, USA
    Third: 1.B.1 Education 2.0: The Future of the Classroom Sean M, MCAHS
    HM: 1.D.1 On The Line Jordan P, MCAHS, USA
  • 6. Group 2How the WWW has changed the world
    Judged by Macintosh, Union and Cummings
    First: 2.D.2 Facebook, Twitter and a Flat World by Carlie M, MCAHS, USA
    Second (tie): 2.C.1 WWW Social Entrepreneurship by TalaHashem, QA, Qatar and 2.C.2 How the WWW has changed the World by Mecca M. WHS, USA
  • 7. Group 3Workflow Software
    Judged by Vrotny, Durff and Union
    First: 3.F.1 Workflow Software by Lindsey Paulsen, TS, USA
    Second: 3.D.1 Workflow Software by Chiara Navarre, WHS
    Third: 3.B.1 Workflow Software by Cody Weisz, TS, U.S.A
  • 8. Group 4Uploading: Changing Shape of Information
    Judged by May, Vrotny, Singh
    First: 4.A.1 The Internet is a Shelf by Kellie E, MCAHS, USA
    Second: 4.B.1 The New World by Chuck F, MCAHS, USA
    Third: 4.F.1 CSI: How We Live & Play by Marisa F, MCAHS, USA
  • 9. Group 5Web 2.0
    Judged by Union, Smith, Thompson
    First: 5.F.2 Twitter: Not Just for Fun by Autumn K, MCAHS, USA
    Second: 5.E.1 - Symphony of Web 2.0 by Ben W., GHS, USA
    Third: 5.D.1 Web 2.0 Wins Presidency by Maria M., MCAHS, USA
  • 10. Group 6Globalisation and Outsourcing
    Judged by May, Macintosh, Davis
    First: 6.D.1 Long Live Funny Cat-Outsourcing by Jacourtney W. WHS, USA
    Second: 6.B.1 What Makes the World Go 'Round? by Robby M, MCAHS, USA
    Third: 6.E.1 Outsourcing & Its Effects by Justin S, MCAHS, USA
  • 11. Group 7Google Takes Over the World
    Judged by Davis, McLaughlin, Cummings
    First: 7.D.1 Are You Addicted to Google? by Heather C, MCAHS, USA
    Second: 7.E.2 Sketching Up the World by Ed F, MCAHS, USA
    Third: 7.B.1 Innovation, Invention and Prediction: Google by Kuter I, GHS, USA
  • 12. Group 8PLE's and Social Networking
    Judged by Durff, Sheko, Thompson
    First: 8.B.1 Facebook 2.0: Social Networking to the Next Level by Jessica S, MCAHS, USA
    Second: 8.E.1 Facebook Advertisement by Amber D, GHS, USA
    Third: 8.A.1 Social Networking Today by Stefanie B, MCAHS, USA
  • 13. Group 9Mobile and Ubiquitous
    Judged by Coleman, Van ‘tHooft, McLaughlin
    First: 9.C.1 The Journey ,by Salvador A., WHS, USA
    Second (tie): 9.B.1 The Future of Our Future, Ryan I, GHS, USA and 9.A.2 Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology by Chelsea B. , SPA, USA
    Third: 9.B.2 Our Ubiquitous Reality: The Future of Mobile Phones by Brittany S, MCAHS, USA
  • 14. Group 10Virtual Communication
    Judged by Turner, Zenhausern, Coleman
    First: 10.D.2 Virtual Communication by Yaroslav Loginov, Sotogrande International School, Spain
    Second: 10.B.1 Virtual communication by Mona H. WHS, USA
    Third: 10.D.1 Virtual Communication by AmnaNassralla, QA, Qatar
  • 15. Group 11Wireless Connectivity
    Judged by Van ‘tHooft, Durff, Singh
    First: 11.F.2 Mu Ji H's Wireless Connectivity by Mu Ji Hwang, QA, Qatar
    Second: 11.A.1 Have You Heard of It? by Ismael G, GHS, USA
    Third: 11.A.2 Wirelessology by Josh C, MCAHS, USA
  • 16. Meta-Judge Awards
    The meta-judge for this project is Steve Madsen, a flat classroom teacher from Australia. Steve is a member of the Flat Classroom Board of Advisors and has attended the Flat Classroom Workshop in Mumbai recently.
    Message from Steve
    “It is an accomplishment in its own right to successfully complete a video with the myriad of difficulties that can be encountered, upload to the Ning and embed in the respective wiki. Well done to everyone who succeeded in uploading their multimedia artifact..”
  • 17. Honourable Mention
    7.D.1 by Heather C, MCAHS, USA
    “Are you addicted to Google”
    Judges comment: “Are You Addicted to Google' approached the task in a different fashion and the overall strategy was a good one. A huge number of sound effects were used which added to the quality of the end product. Many, many images were used, however, some of the images were too pixilated and took away from the quality of the video. The sub-titling phrasing was commendable but often tended to scroll too fast across the screen. More detailed credits and citations were also needed. Overall, a fun end product to watch”.
  • 18. Third Place (tie)
    11.F.2 by Mu Ji Hwang, QA, Qatar
    “Wireless Connectivity”
    Judges comment:
    “Mu Ji H's Wireless Connectivity' used many interesting techniques in the production of this multimedia artifact and seemed to make use of the limited resources at hand. Good camera angles and shots were used as well as some 'special effects'. The use of different intonations of the voice and exaggerated acting were appreciated. However, there seemed to be little or no evidence of credits nor outsourcing..”
  • 19. Third Place (tie)
    4.A.1 by Kellie E, MCAHS, USA
    “The Internet is a Shelf”
    Judges Comment:
    “The Internet is a Shelf' made good use of music, transitions and the audio quality was good. The use of a bookshelf to explain technology concepts was very much appreciated as was the comparison of a hard copy application and an online application. Proper credits and citations were used in this end product.”
  • 20. Second Place
    10.D.2 by Yaroslav Loginov, Sotogrande International School, Spain
    “Virtual Communication”
    Judges Comment:
    “Virtual Communication' also used a different approach to explain their concept using original images in animations. However, there was no evidence that an outsourced multimedia artifact had been requested nor used within this end product. Many animation and screen shot techniques were used as well as purposeful audio effects. Several sub-topics were explained well and the audience should gain a good understanding of the concept after watching this multimedia artifact. It was also appreciated that some prediction was used which is always fun to see if the predictions become reality or close to it.”
  • 21. FIRST PLACE
    The Flat Classroom Project 2010-1 overall winner,
    Judges Comment:
    “It was appreciated that a different approach was used and that efforts to obtain an outsource video was evident. The audio was clear; good simple, effective images were used which focused on current events. The music chosen was effective and the use of a collage of images had positive impact. The author was assigned a difficult concept and the audience should gain a good understanding of the concept after watching this multimedia artifact.”
  • 22. The Winner is…….
    The Flat Classroom Project 2010-1 overall winner for Best Multimedia Artifact is:
    9.C.1 by Salvador A., WHS, USA
    “The Journey”
  • 23. Congratulations to all students and teachers
    Thank you to all judges, advisors, researchers and supporters.
    Flat Classroom Projects
    http://flatclassroomproject.org
    Flat Classroom Project Ning
    http://flatclassroomproject.ning.com
    Flat Classrooms (for educators)
    http://flatclassrooms.ning.com
    Email: flatclassroomproject@gmail.com
    Flat Classroom ™ Co-founded by Vicki Davis and Julie Lindsay