Developing Open Content Like Open Software

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

1 comments

Comments 1 - 1 of 1 previous next Post a comment

  • + andreasmeiszner Andreas Meiszner 3 years ago
    Hi Jason
    I really liked the Open Learning Production slide (besides this 'e').
    However, I don’t see students as being the bug tracking army only, and I also don’t see this clear divides on groups.
    If you follow up on the open source line than students could be also writer, developer, editors, or designer. This will depend on individual abilities.
    Nevertheless very interesting presentation.
    I assume there are more people at the OU working on the same area than me that I don’t know, than the ones that I do know.
    Cheers
    Andreas
Post a comment
Embed Video
Edit your comment Cancel

11 Favorites & 1 Group

Developing Open Content Like Open Software - Presentation Transcript

  1. Open Source + Open Content = Jason Cole Cognition and Instruction Associates [email_address] Open Education
  2. Driving Questions
    • Why are textbooks so expensive?
    • With the growing collections of open materials, what is the future of educational materials?
    • Why are wikibooks so bad?
    • How can we leverage the Moodle install base to further true open education with open content?
  3. Textbook Costs Impacting Students
    • Textbook costs =
      • $900 / year
      • 17.5% of tuition at 4 year colleges
      • 43% of tuition at 2 year colleges
    • 43% of students didn't purchase a required textbook
    • Source: Ripoff 101 State PIRGS Higher Education Project
  4. Textbook Prices
    • Since 1994:
      • PPI + 14%
      • General Publishers + 19%
      • Textbook wholesale + 62%
    • Bundled supplementary materials add 15% - 45%
    • Source: Ripoff 101 State PIRGS Higher Education Project
  5. Supplementary Materials
    • 30% of faculty use publishers' online homework
    • 19% use online quizzes
    • 74% required or recommended supplementary materials
    • 90% believe under-prepared students would do better spending more time with textbook
    • 79% believe under-prepared students would do better if they used supplementary materials
  6. Use Of Materials
      • - Jim Farmer, Faculty Selection and Use of Publisher-Provided Textbooks and
      • Supplementary Materials in the United States
  7. Supplementary Materials Work
  8. Supplementary Materials
    • Current research may suggest that increasing the use of learning materials – and the cost – could yield significant improvements in completions and lower the unit costs.
      • - Jim Farmer, Faculty Selection and Use of Publisher-Provided Textbooks and
      • Supplementary Materials in the United States
  9. Transfer of Costs
    • Publishers are investing in these supplementary materials to meet the needs of faculty. This investment may be supported by higher “textbook” prices; if so, then students are now paying for materials and service rather than the college or university paying as part of instructional technology. This analysis does not address the issue of “Who pays”.
    • - Jim Farmer, Faculty Selection and Use of Publisher-Provided Textbooks and Supplementary Materials in the United States
  10. Whither Open Content?
    • Two areas for investigation
      • Production of materials
      • Use and integration
  11. Content Development Models Wikipedia is not the answer!
  12. OCW's
    • Advantages
    • Most comprehensive
    • Structured collections
    • High reputation
    • Common Licensing
    • Disadvantages
    • Incomplete (textbook, reading lists)
    • Static
    • No feedback
    • No atomic improvement
  13. Open Repositories (Merlot, NLN)
    • Advantages
    • Small pieces
    • Tend to have more interactive material
    • Tend to have good searchability / findability
    • Disadvantages
    • Small pieces not joined
    • Variable quality
    • No integration
    • Not comprehensive
    • No common licensing
  14. Open Wikis (Wikipedia, etc)
    • Advantages
    • Many hands
    • Comprehensive scope
    • Task decomposition
    • Common licensing
    • Disadvantages
    • Regression to the mean(est)
    • Not stable / vetted
    • Variable quality
    • No integration
    • Not comprehensive
  15. Open Source Software Production Patch Commit Bug Reports Feature Requests Patch Submit Prioritize Bug / Feature Priorities Quality Review Adoption Release Bug Tracker Code Repository Software Version Users / Testers Coders Committers Architects
  16. Open Source Success
    • Charismatic Leader(s)
    • Earn your stripes
    • Decomposable tasks
    • Version Control
    • Large community of users
    • Regression control
  17. Open eLearning Production Patch Commit Bug Reports Feature Requests Patch Submit Prioritize Bug / Feature Priorities Release Eval Adoption Release Bug Tracker Content Repository Collection Version Faculty / Students Writers / Developers Editors / SMEs Inst Designers
  18. Open Source Success
    • Charismatic Leader + Earn your stripes = Strong social norms
    • Decomposable tasks + Version Control = Distributed workload
    • Large community + Bug Tracking = Distributed testing and evaluation
    • Feedback systems + Regression control = Learning system
  19. Time To Produce a Textbook Source: American Association of Publishers
  20. Open Content Usability
    • S earchability
    • F indability
    • O btainability
  21. Open Content Searchability OCW Connexions Merlot Wikipedia Internet Archive Project Gutenberg I know there's cool stuff out there. Where can I find it?
  22. Open Content Searchability OCW Connexions Merlot Wikipedia Internet Archive Project Gutenberg
    • Lack of standard search API
    • No common metadata
    • Little SEO
  23. Open Content Searchability OCW Connexions Merlot Wikipedia Internet Archive Project Gutenberg
    • Federated Search API
    • Standards, Objectives and
    • Competencies for Metadata
    • Federated search engines
    • embedded in VLEs
  24. Open Content Findability OCW Connexions Merlot Wikipedia Internet Archive Project Gutenberg All this great stuff! What's the best for me?
  25. Open Content Findability OCW Connexions Merlot Wikipedia Internet Archive Project Gutenberg
    • No aggregation across collections
    • No common quality / suitability data
    • No feedback on suitability
  26. Open Content Findability OCW Connexions Merlot Wikipedia Internet Archive Project Gutenberg
    • Vetted Collections
    • Collecting Implicit Metadata
    • Tagging and rating
  27. Open Content Obtainability OCW Connexions Merlot Wikipedia Internet Archive Project Gutenberg LMS I found some content. How do I use it?
  28. Open Content Obtainability OCW Connexions Merlot Wikipedia Internet Archive Project Gutenberg LMS
    • Lack of standard repository
    • API
    • No common metadata
    • No common content
    • standards
    • Incomplete collections
    • Licensing confusion
  29. Open Content Obtainability OCW Connexions Merlot Wikipedia Internet Archive Project Gutenberg LMS
    • JSR-170 Web Services
    • Common Cartridge
    • Common Object API
    • Generic authoring tools
    • Common licensing
  30. Where to go from here
    • Create learning communities for development of content
    • Mirrors for open repositories with common API
    • Implement JSR-170, Common Cartridge in Moodle
    • New kinds of eLearning materials organizations
  31. Market Failure
    • Large conglomerates are selling educational imprints
      • Elsvier
    • Earnings down at major publishers
    • 20 – 30% of textbooks every reprinted
    • 8,000 publishers – 262,000 titles
  32. Textbook Costs
  33. Rival vs Non-rival Goods
    • Rival goods – my use prevents you from using it (most arrangements of atoms)
    • Non-rival goods – my use does non prevent you from using it (most arrangements of bits)
    • Problem – The production of non-rival goods requires rival inputs (time, money)
    • Central problem of the information society
  34. Current Approach
    • Treat non-rival goods like rival goods
    • Deny the fundamental nature of non-rival goods (information wants to be free)
    • Copyright, Patents, DRM, Lawsuits
  35. Aikido
    • Move with your opponent, not against them
    • Get out of the way
    • Maintain your balance
  36. Aikido Economics
    • Share non-rival goods – let the information free
    • Sell rival good versions of non-rival goods – you want the print version?
    • Sell rival good supplements (services, experiences, certifications)
  37. Open Textbook Costs
  38. Conclusions
    • Open Learning Content = Linux for Civilization
    • Market forces create artificial scarcity – impeding education
    • New technologies create opportunities for new types of organizations
    • Comprehensive collections will create a critical link for meeting the challenges of the next millennium

+ jason.colejason.cole, 3 years ago

custom

2912 views, 11 favs, 6 embeds more stats

A presentation from the 2007 MoodleMoot Albuquerque more

More info about this document

CC Attribution-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-ShareAlike License

Go to text version

  • Total Views 2912
    • 2850 on SlideShare
    • 62 from embeds
  • Comments 1
  • Favorites 11
  • Downloads 1
Most viewed embeds
  • 51 views on http://usingmoodle.blogspot.com
  • 7 views on http://edusign.blogspot.com
  • 1 views on http://flosscom.net
  • 1 views on http://64.233.169.104
  • 1 views on http://www.blogger.com

more

All embeds
  • 51 views on http://usingmoodle.blogspot.com
  • 7 views on http://edusign.blogspot.com
  • 1 views on http://flosscom.net
  • 1 views on http://64.233.169.104
  • 1 views on http://www.blogger.com
  • 1 views on http://msshelved.wordpress.com

less

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint
Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

Categories

Groups / Events