Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Going Open: Lessons Learned from the Open Course Library


Published on

Presentation given at 2010 NW eLearn conference in Vancouver, WA on October 13, 2011.

Published in: Education, Technology

Going Open: Lessons Learned from the Open Course Library

  1. 1. Going Open - Lessons Learned from the Open Course Library<br />NW eLearn2011 – Vancouver, WA<br />October 13, 2011 <br />Tom Caswell & Scott Dennis<br />WA State Board for Community & Technical Colleges<br />
  2. 2. Open?<br />“Open” Terminology:<br />Open = free/flexible/sharable <br />Open License = sharable license (example: Creative Commons’ most open license: CC-BY)<br />Open CourseWare (OCW) = sharable course materials<br />Open Educational Resources (OER) = sharable learning materials (broader than OCW)<br />
  3. 3. Making the Case for “Open”<br />Why is “Open” Important in Education?<br />Efficiency & Affordability<br />Quality<br />Self-interest<br />Collaborative Serendipity <br />
  4. 4. Making the Case for “Open”<br />What is this madness??<br />(How do we do open?)<br />
  5. 5.
  6. 6. What is Creative Commons?<br />A simple, standardizedway to grant copyright permissions to your creative work.<br />
  7. 7. Share Alike<br />Attribution<br />Non-Commercial<br />No Derivative Works<br />Step 1: Choose License Conditions<br /><br />7<br />
  8. 8. Step 2: Receive License<br />8<br />
  9. 9. Each CC license comes in 3 formats:<br />
  10. 10. 500 million open resources so far<br />
  11. 11. Higher Ed<br />
  12. 12. Open Course Library<br />Goals<br />Design and share 81 high enrollment, gatekeeper courses<br />Improve course completion rates<br />Lower textbook costs for students (<$30)<br />Provide new resources for faculty to use in their courses<br />Fully engage our colleges in the global open educational resources discussion. <br />
  13. 13. Timeline<br />Phase 1: 42 courses<br />Available October 31, 2011 at<br />Phase 2 : 39 courses<br />Available Spring 2013<br />
  14. 14. Design Process<br />81 courses built by our own faculty<br />Define learning objectives<br />Use existing, quality Open Educational Resources (OER)<br />Fill in gaps with their own content<br />
  15. 15. More? Better? Faster?<br />How does OER help teach more students and teach them better?<br />Non-rivalrous, scalable, searchable<br />Allows students to preview and review<br />Paves the way for lifelong learning<br />Can be customized, translated, improved<br />Data feedback loops are useless without the ability to change the content <br />
  16. 16. Potential Savings<br />81 courses = 411,133 enrollments / year<br />Textbook savings up to $41M+ in / year <br />At 25% adoption (faculty decision), savings to students will be $7.2M / year. <br />Completions rates may also increase when all students can afford course materials<br />
  17. 17. Lessons Learned<br />
  18. 18. Lessons Learned<br />Phase 1 Faculty Concerns:<br />Many were unfamiliar with ANGEL LMS<br />No way to compare work between course teams<br />Too many websites to keep track of<br />Phase 2 Adjustments:<br />Using Google Docs to collaborate & share as we go<br />All project information in one Google Site<br />
  19. 19. Why Google Docs?<br />Pros:<br />Collaborative, consistent, simple tool<br />Similar to Microsoft Word<br />Broader adoption base – not limited to specific LMS communities (LMS-neutral)<br />Allows for easier viewing, sharing, saving copies<br />Cons:<br />No automated quizzed & assessments<br />Designers can link to other tools or type up questions<br />LMS adopters : move OCL resources into LMS<br />
  20. 20. Other Challenges<br />Measuring adoptions<br />How to count adoptions in the open<br /> Institutional concerns over copyright<br />Is the YouTube “take down” policy adequate?<br />Technical challenges with current technology<br />Need better support for versioning content<br />Need “push-button” open publishing feature<br />
  21. 21. Tom Caswell<br />Scott Dennis<br />State Board for Community & Technical Colleges<br /><br />Slides at:<br />