Eysenbach: PHR 2.0 (Personal Health Records 2.0) Vancouver

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    4 Favorites

    Eysenbach: PHR 2.0 (Personal Health Records 2.0) Vancouver - Presentation Transcript

    1. Associate Professor  Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto; Senior Scientist ,  Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Division of Medical Decision Making and Health Care Research;  Toronto General Research Institute of the UHN, Toronto General Hospital, Canada PHR 2.0 Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH
    2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Web20_en.png
    3. JMIR “Medicine 2.0” Special Theme Issue
    4. www.medicine20congress.com , Toronto, Sept 4-5 th , 2008
    5. Medicine 2.0 (“next generation medicine”) Full paper will appear as: Gunther Eysenbach. Medicine 2.0. J Med Internet Res 2008 (in press) http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2196/jmir.1030 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1030 Consumer / Patient Health Professionals Biomedical Researchers Science 2.0 Peer-review 2.0 Personal Health Record 2.0 Virtual Communities (peer-to-peer) Professional Communities (peer-to-peer) Health 2.0 HealthVault Google Health HealthBook Sermo WebCite CiteULike MDPIXX WiserWiki eDoctr BioWizard Dissect Medicine E-learning PLoS One BMC JMIR Wikis Blogs RSS RDF, Semantic Web Virtual Worlds Web 2.0 Technologies & Approaches Apomediation Participation Social Networking Collaboration XML AJAX Openess Revolution Health PatientsLikeMe PeerClip Connotea ALIVE HealthMap caBIG
    6. EMR “ Tethered” PHR/ PAEHR “ stand-alone” PHR PHR EMR Read only Read+Write/Annotate PHR PHR © Gunther Eysenbach, CC-BY
    7. EMR EMR PHR Different providers “ interconnected” PHR © Gunther Eysenbach, CC-BY PHR PHR
    8. Records at Financial institutions Personal Finance Records © Gunther Eysenbach, CC-BY
    9. EMR EMR PHR Different providers Health Information is tightly protected © Gunther Eysenbach, CC-BY PHR PHR
    10. What these models neglect: People want to SHARE some of their personal information Meier A, Lyons EJ, Frydman G, Forlenza M, Rimer BK How Cancer Survivors Provide Support on Cancer-Related Internet Mailing Lists J Med Internet Res 2007;9(2):e12 <URL: http://www.jmir.org/2007/2/e12/>
    11. Another example for sharing personal health information
    12. EMR EMR PHR PHR PHR Different providers PHR 2.0 © Gunther Eysenbach, CC-BY Community Other peoples’ PHR Other peoples’ PHR Other peoples’ PHR
    13. What does this all mean for health care / eHealth (1) ? “ [People from the] Google Generation are impatient and have zero tolerance for delay, information and entertainment needs must be fulfilled immediately ( e.g. Johnson, 2006: Shih and Allen 2006)” Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future – The Literature on Young People and Their Information Behavior URL:http://www.ucl.ac.uk/slais/research/ciber/downloads/GG%20Work%20Package%20II.pdf. Accessed: 2008-04-09. (Archived by WebCite ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5WxqwuH4g)
    14. What does this all mean for health care / eHealth (1) ?
      • Consumer Expectations !
        • Web 2.0 savvy consumers will push the envelope
        • Just providing a institutions-specific “portal” (or tethered PHR) will not be enough
        • Current developments will help to engage patients, but the next generation will quickly demand to be able to do more with their data
        • Patients 2.0 will demand full control over their data (as a minimum, XML export!)
    15. What does this all mean for health care / eHealth (2) ?
      • Long Tail
        • Even patients with rare diseases generate enough critical mass to create patient networks
      • Importance of Users / Consumers
        • Encourage participation – users add value
        • Trust your users as co-developers
        • Personal health information entered by users is trustworthy!
        • Facilitate network effects
      • Cooperate, don’t control
        • Towards decentralized quality control
        • Peers and Web 2.0 tools (recommender systems, collaborative filtering etc.) will play a powerful role in filtering quality information (decentralized model of quality control) APOMEDIARIES instead of INTERMEDIARIES
    16. www.medicine20congress.com , Toronto, Sept 4-5 th , 2008
    17. Thank you! Dr G. Eysenbach, Email: geysenba@uhnres.utoronto.ca, Personal Homepage: http://yi.com/ey/

    + eyseneysen, 2 years ago

    custom

    1358 views, 4 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Brief talk from the COACH workshop in Vancouver in more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 1358
      • 1358 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 4
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories