Associate Professor  Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto; Senior Scientist ,  ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Web20_en.png
JMIR “Medicine 2.0” Special Theme Issue
www.medicine20congress.com , Toronto, Sept 4-5 th , 2008
Medicine 2.0  (“next generation medicine”) Full paper will appear as: Gunther Eysenbach. Medicine 2.0. J Med Internet Res ...
EMR “ Tethered”  PHR/ PAEHR “ stand-alone”  PHR PHR EMR Read only Read+Write/Annotate PHR PHR © Gunther Eysenbach,  CC-BY
EMR EMR PHR Different providers “ interconnected”  PHR © Gunther Eysenbach,  CC-BY PHR PHR
Records at Financial institutions Personal Finance Records © Gunther Eysenbach,  CC-BY
EMR EMR PHR Different providers Health Information is tightly protected © Gunther Eysenbach,  CC-BY PHR PHR
What these models neglect: People want to SHARE some of their personal information Meier A, Lyons EJ, Frydman G, Forlenza ...
Another example for sharing personal health information
EMR EMR PHR PHR PHR Different providers PHR 2.0 © Gunther Eysenbach,  CC-BY Community Other peoples’ PHR Other peoples’ PH...
What does this all mean for health care / eHealth (1) ? “ [People from the] Google Generation are impatient and have zero ...
What does this all mean for health care / eHealth (1) ? <ul><li>Consumer Expectations ! </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Web 2.0 savv...
What does this all mean for health care / eHealth (2) ? <ul><li>Long Tail </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Even patients with rare di...
www.medicine20congress.com , Toronto, Sept 4-5 th , 2008
Thank you! Dr G. Eysenbach,  Email: geysenba@uhnres.utoronto.ca,  Personal Homepage: http://yi.com/ey/
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Eysenbach: PHR 2.0 (Personal Health Records 2.0) Vancouver

2,488

Published on

Brief talk from the COACH workshop in Vancouver in May 2008 on patient-accessible electronic health records. I am talking about a new paradigm which I call PHR 2.0

0 Comments
6 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,488
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
6
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Eysenbach: PHR 2.0 (Personal Health Records 2.0) Vancouver

  1. 1. Associate Professor  Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto; Senior Scientist ,  Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Division of Medical Decision Making and Health Care Research;  Toronto General Research Institute of the UHN, Toronto General Hospital, Canada PHR 2.0 Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH
  2. 2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Web20_en.png
  3. 3. JMIR “Medicine 2.0” Special Theme Issue
  4. 4. www.medicine20congress.com , Toronto, Sept 4-5 th , 2008
  5. 5. Medicine 2.0 (“next generation medicine”) Full paper will appear as: Gunther Eysenbach. Medicine 2.0. J Med Internet Res 2008 (in press) http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2196/jmir.1030 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1030 Consumer / Patient Health Professionals Biomedical Researchers Science 2.0 Peer-review 2.0 Personal Health Record 2.0 Virtual Communities (peer-to-peer) Professional Communities (peer-to-peer) Health 2.0 HealthVault Google Health HealthBook Sermo WebCite CiteULike MDPIXX WiserWiki eDoctr BioWizard Dissect Medicine E-learning PLoS One BMC JMIR Wikis Blogs RSS RDF, Semantic Web Virtual Worlds Web 2.0 Technologies & Approaches Apomediation Participation Social Networking Collaboration XML AJAX Openess Revolution Health PatientsLikeMe PeerClip Connotea ALIVE HealthMap caBIG
  6. 6. EMR “ Tethered” PHR/ PAEHR “ stand-alone” PHR PHR EMR Read only Read+Write/Annotate PHR PHR © Gunther Eysenbach, CC-BY
  7. 7. EMR EMR PHR Different providers “ interconnected” PHR © Gunther Eysenbach, CC-BY PHR PHR
  8. 8. Records at Financial institutions Personal Finance Records © Gunther Eysenbach, CC-BY
  9. 9. EMR EMR PHR Different providers Health Information is tightly protected © Gunther Eysenbach, CC-BY PHR PHR
  10. 10. What these models neglect: People want to SHARE some of their personal information Meier A, Lyons EJ, Frydman G, Forlenza M, Rimer BK How Cancer Survivors Provide Support on Cancer-Related Internet Mailing Lists J Med Internet Res 2007;9(2):e12 <URL: http://www.jmir.org/2007/2/e12/>
  11. 11. Another example for sharing personal health information
  12. 12. EMR EMR PHR PHR PHR Different providers PHR 2.0 © Gunther Eysenbach, CC-BY Community Other peoples’ PHR Other peoples’ PHR Other peoples’ PHR
  13. 13. What does this all mean for health care / eHealth (1) ? “ [People from the] Google Generation are impatient and have zero tolerance for delay, information and entertainment needs must be fulfilled immediately ( e.g. Johnson, 2006: Shih and Allen 2006)” Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future – The Literature on Young People and Their Information Behavior URL:http://www.ucl.ac.uk/slais/research/ciber/downloads/GG%20Work%20Package%20II.pdf. Accessed: 2008-04-09. (Archived by WebCite ® at http://www.webcitation.org/5WxqwuH4g)
  14. 14. What does this all mean for health care / eHealth (1) ? <ul><li>Consumer Expectations ! </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Web 2.0 savvy consumers will push the envelope </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Just providing a institutions-specific “portal” (or tethered PHR) will not be enough </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Current developments will help to engage patients, but the next generation will quickly demand to be able to do more with their data </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Patients 2.0 will demand full control over their data (as a minimum, XML export!) </li></ul></ul>
  15. 15. What does this all mean for health care / eHealth (2) ? <ul><li>Long Tail </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Even patients with rare diseases generate enough critical mass to create patient networks </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Importance of Users / Consumers </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Encourage participation – users add value </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Trust your users as co-developers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Personal health information entered by users is trustworthy! </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Facilitate network effects </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Cooperate, don’t control </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Towards decentralized quality control </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Peers and Web 2.0 tools (recommender systems, collaborative filtering etc.) will play a powerful role in filtering quality information (decentralized model of quality control) APOMEDIARIES instead of INTERMEDIARIES </li></ul></ul>
  16. 16. www.medicine20congress.com , Toronto, Sept 4-5 th , 2008
  17. 17. Thank you! Dr G. Eysenbach, Email: geysenba@uhnres.utoronto.ca, Personal Homepage: http://yi.com/ey/

×