James Hansen, leader of the of the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security's Climate Risk Management theme, presented experiences in providing climate information services to farmers at an International Fund for Agricultural Development East and Southern Africa regional Knowledge Management and Capacity Building Forum, 16-18 October 2013 in Nairobi, Kenya.
http://ifad-un.blogspot.com/2013/10/linking-knowledge-to-action-across-east_17.html
ccafs.cgiar.org/themes/climate-risk-management
Climate Information Services: Experiences from CGIAR Research Program on Climate - James Hansen
1. Climate Information Services:
Experiences from CGIAR
Research Program on Climate
James Hansen
Theme 2 Leader: Adaptation through Managing Climate Risk
IRI, Columbia University, New York
ESA Climate Change, Land and Gender Workshop
Nairobi, Kenya, 17 October
24 Jun 2013
1
2. The What and Why of Climate
Services
Message 1: Climate services can make
a contribution to climate-resilient
development investment.
2
3. The cost of climate variability
Climate risk contributes to chronic
poverty, vulnerability, food insecurity
•
•
•
Opportunity cost: uncertainty
Affects farmers, markets, the food system,
the “relief trap”
Climate variability is increasing
Dependent on information
Constrained by information gaps
HARDSHIP
•
•
FORFEITED
OPPORTUNITY
Several opportunities to help agriculture
adapt are…
CRISIS
•
•
Downside risk: shocks
Probability density
•
Climatic outcome (e.g. production, income)
3
4. Examples
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Adjusting farm management and input use
Community-level early warning and response to rapid
onset hazards (flood, storms)
Characterize risks for targeting agricultural technology
and management
Index-based insurance to protect assets, increase access
to credit and inputs
Improve safety nets and food security interventions
Government planning and budgeting?
Understand climate change vs. natural variability vs. nonclimatic changes to inform long-term planning
4
5. Salience: What kind of
information do farmers need?
•
Types of climate information:
•
•
•
•
Historic observations
Monitored
Predictive, all lead times ≤ ~20 years
Some generalizations:
•
•
•
•
Downscaled, locally-relevant
Tailored to types & timing of decisions
“Value-added” climate information:
impacts on agriculture, advisories
Capacity to understand and act on
complex information
5
6. Time scales: weather or climate?
•
•
Depends on time horizon of decision
Generalizations about increasing lead time:
• Tillage
• Land allocation
• Changing farming or
livelihood system
Decisions more context- and farmer-specific
• Sowing
• Crop selection
• Major capital
• Irrigation
• Household labor
Information becomes more uncertain, hence more complex
investment
allocation, seasonal
• Crop protection
migration
• Migration
•
• Technology selection
•
•
• Therefore the scope of services needed increases
Harvest
• Family succession
• Financing for inputs
• Contract farming
WEATHER
HOURS
DECADES
DAYS
…
CLIMATE
WEEKS
MONTHS
YEARS
6
7. Climate services in CCAFS Theme 2
Objective 2:
Improved, climateFood System Risk
Management informed responses
Scale
Fill key gaps:
• Knowledge
• Tools & Methods
• Evidence
• Capacity
• Coordination
Objective 1:
Local Risk
Management
GENDER & EQITY
LENS
Enhanced support
for managing risk
Resilient food systems,
Improved food security
Objective 3:
Climate
Information and
Services
Climate-resilient
rural livelihoods
7
8. CCAFS climate services experience
Message 2: CCAFS is contributing to
bringing climate services to smallholder
farming and agricultural planning.
8
9. Piloting in Kenya, Senegal, …
•
•
•
•
•
Learning laboratory
Improved information design
Workshop process
Evidence of what is possible
Demand for scaling up
9
10. Climate services for government
planning in Ethiopia
•
•
•
Engagement, analysis
of subnational planning,
budgeting process
Social learning platform,
testing, dissemination
Targeted Outcome:
climate-informed
planning upstream of
existing national
emergency decision
processes.
10
13. Tackling gender and social equity
•
•
Women disadvantaged when
scaling up climate services
Ongoing project (U. Florida):
•
•
•
Knowledge of how women are
disadvantages and how to
overcome bias
Protocol for identifying and
addressing inequity in climate
communication
Gender challenges
incorporated into training for
intermediaries
13
14. Making climate information
useful to farmers
•
•
Spatial scale problem
Beyond seasonal averages
•
•
•
•
Onset, length
Dry spells
Growing, chill degree-days
?
Challenges
•
•
•
Gaps in data
Gaps in daily data
Capacity of NMS
14
15. Making climate information
useful to farmers
•
•
•
•
Started in Ethiopia, with IRI, U. Reading, NMA, CCAFS
Satellite + station, 10km grid, 30 year complete record
“Maprooms” built on Data Library software
Owned, implemented by NMS
STATION
BLENDED
SATELLITE
15
17. ENACTS at NMS (Ethiopia, Tanzania,
Madagascar, …), AGRHYMET
Enables NMS to customize, generate and
disseminate locally relevant climate information
without over-taxing limited human resource
17
18. Pulling the pieces together:
World Vision-Tanzania
•
•
World’s largest
development NGO
Secure the Future
Tanzania:
•
•
•
Reach ~1.7M
farmers +
pastoralists
66 ADP offices
•
•
staff, partnership
infrastructure
Long-term
commitment,
where needed
18
20. Investing in Climate Services
Message 3: The right investment,
leveraging other efforts, can bring climate
services to smallholder farmers – at scale
20
21. What can we leverage?
•
UN Global Framework for Climate
Services (GFCS)
•
Climate Services Partnership (CSP)
•
ClimDev-Africa
•
Regional climate centers
•
CCAFS Theme 2 hosted by IRI
21
22. What else is needed?
Key challenges
•
•
•
•
•
Salience: tailoring content, scale, format, lead-time to farm
decision-making
Legitimacy: giving farmers an effective voice in design and
delivery
Access: providing timely access to remote rural communities with
marginal infrastructure
Equity: ensuring that women, poor, socially marginalized benefit
Integration: climate services as part of a larger package of support
22
23. What else is needed?
Institutional arrangements
•
•
•
Limitations of supply-driven climate services
Expand the boundary to agricultural research and
development
Expand the boundaries to give farmers a voice
Co-owner
(farmer)
NMS
(climate)
INFORMATION
PARTNERSHIP
NMS
(climate)
NARES
(agriculture)
PARTNERSHIP
VALUE-ADDED
INFORMATION
NARES
User
User
(farmer)
(farmer)
(agriculture)
CLIMATE SERVICE
CLIMATE SERVICE
23
24. Suggestions for investing in
climate services for agriculture
•
•
•
•
•
Address climate information supply, communication, use
bottlenecks in parallel
Improving information supply
•
•
Low-hanging fruit for farmer-relevant climate information
Caution about investing in observing infrastructure alone
Two-fold path to communication capacity:
•
•
Institutional: through agricultural extension, NGOs
ICT and media
Institutional coordination mechanisms. Who owns
climate services for agriculture?
Leverage and coordinate with GFCS, broader climate
services community
24
Editor's Notes
Objective 2.2 About food system-level interventions in the face of climate-related shocks.…Using advance information to better manage climate risk through, e.g. delivery, trade and crisis response
Agriculture is arguably the sector that is most vulnerable to a variable and changing climate. The risk associated with climate variability contributes to chronic poverty and food insecurity.Consider the probability distribution of some climate-sensitive agricultural outcome, such as production or farmer income. Climate-related risk is most visible at the left tail of the distribution, when a shock such as drought or flood leads to a food crisis. Farmers must often resort to coping strategies strategies, such as selling productive assets or withdrawing children from school, that allow then to make it through the crisis or hardship, but that cause long term loss of livelihood potential even after the stress is over.The uncertainty associated with climate variability prevents farmers from taking advantage of good and even average years. This is because management that is optimal on average may be far from optimal for the seasonal climate in most years. Furthermore, farmers who are wisely risk-averse don’t manage for average conditions, but for more adverse conditions. Climate risk is a disincentive for the risk-averse farmer to adopt improved technology, invest in their soils, and take advantage of profitable opportunities. Climate-related risk impacts not only farmers, but also institutions such as the financial, input and commodity markets that farmers depend on. These effects of climate risk can trap rural populations in poverty. At an international scale, increasing vulnerability to climate has led to an increasing proportion of overseas development assistance being diverted to food crisis response, and away from the long-term development needed to reduce vulnerability. This cycle of declining investment in long-term development; and increasing vulnerability, and dependency on emergency assistance as the “relief trap.”There are a number of opportunities to help move rural communities out of the cycle of poverty and vulnerability, and build resilience. Most depend on climate-related information. Several remain under-exploited because of gaps in climate-related information and services.
The agricultural sector is very diverse, and the types of information and services that it need are highly varied and dependent on the context. However we can make a few very broad generalizations. Agricultural decision makers need a combination of historic observations (to characterize variability, trends and risk), monitored information particularly through the growing season, and predictions. The time scale of predictive information needed depends on the time horizon of the particular decision. It can range from short-term weather forecasts, to seasonal prediction, to climate change time scales. However, few agricultural decisions have planning horizons longer than about two decades.NEED FOR LOCALLY-DOWNSCALED INFORMATION, AND INFORMATION TAILORED TO THE TYPES AND TIMING OF DECISIONS SHOULD BE CLEAR. The climate information that is most relevant for agricultural decision making may not be expressed in terms of meteorological quantities. “Value-added” climate information includes things like forecasts of the impacts of weather and seasonal climate fluctuations on crops, rangelands or agriculturally-important pests; management advisories; and decision-support tools.
Conflicting terminology about months-seasons. Why
We have learned a lot about how to design seasonal climate information that meets the need of smallholder farmers, and communicate it in a way that they can communicate
Detailed analysis of decision-making for annual budget/planningUse decision analysis to Identify current sources of information, tradeoffs, and risks.
Professional training for agricultural extension, NGOs, other farmer advisorsExpert workshop (Nairobi, 12-14 June 2013)Review, compile materials and experiencesResource book, adaptable training modules, e-training