SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 57
SIX SIGMA MEASUREMENTS
[object Object],DON’T HAVE TO USE ALL THESE METRIC KNOWLEDGE IS NECESSARY TO INSURE GOOD COMMUNICATION
SIX SIGMA RELATIONSHIPS
DEFININITIONS Number Of Operation Steps  =  m   Defects  =  D Unit  =  U Opportunities For A Defect  =  O Yield  =  Y Nomenclature Total Opportunities (TOP) = U X O Defects Per Unit (DPU) =  D/U Defects Per Unit Opportunity (DPO) =  DPU/O = D/(U  X  O) Defects Per Million Opportunities (DPMO) = DPO  X  10 6 Basic Relationships
DISTRIBUTION OF DEFECTS IN  MANUFACTURED PRODUCT Non-Randomly  Occurring Defect Randomly  Occurring Defect Example Result Conclusion Wrong part in manual insertion parts bin Every board contains  same wrong part in same location. Defects are easier to detect/diagnose & are  less likely to be sent to next operation Mixed parts in manual insertion parts bin. Probability of a board containing wrong part is equal to proportion of  wrong parts in bin Defects are harder to detect/diagnose and are  more likely to be sent to next operation
PROBABILITY OF DEFECTS  IN MANUFACTURED PRODUCT GIVEN:  (1) Average DPU For This Product Is One (DPU=1) (2) Defects are randomly distributed What Is The Probability of Zero Defects In This Unit?
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS  OF DPU ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Product Built In Plant Having Best Process Controls Will Have The Lowest Defects Per Unit Level
DEFECTS PER UNIT Defect  Prevents Product From Fulfilling Physical  And Functional Requirements Of The Customer ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Defects Per Unit = A Count of All Defects - Not a Measure of the Consequences of  The Defect Number of Defects Found at Any Review Point Number of Units Processed Through That Review Point
PREDICTING THE  QUALITY OF PRODUCTS FTY = e -DPU DPU = -ln FTY  Estimation of units containing “q’ defects  (where “q” is not limited to zero) If we use the Poisson distribution Becomes  (DPU) q  e  -DPU q!  x  e -    x! P{x} =
YIELD RELATIONSHIPS Throughput Yield : Y TP   = e -DPU Defects Per Unit: DPU  = -ln(Y) Rolled Throughput Yield: Y RT  =     Y TP i Total Defects Per Unit: TDPU  =  -ln(Y RT ) Normalized Yield:  Y norm   =     Defects per Normalized Unit: DPU norm   =  -ln(Y norm ) i =1 m Y RT m
YIELD Probability with zero defects Specification  Limit Probability of Defect = 1 -  e -DPU Yield =  e -DPU   Y = P(x = 0) = e-   x x! e-  = =  e -D/U   =  e -DPU
THE HIDDEN FACTORY
THE HIDDEN FACTORY Customer  Quality Operation Not OK Scrap Verify Rework Operation Not OK Scrap Verify Rework Y tp Throughput Yield Y tp Throughput Yield Non-Value Added (The Hidden Factory) Value Added (The Visible Factory) Producers Quality Supplier Quality Y rt =    Y tpi m i=10
IMPLICATIONS OF  THE HIDDEN FACTORY  Y e e TP DPU      3679 1 0 . = 1.6321 . 1.63 Equivalent Units Must Be Produced To Get Out 1 Good Unit Every Occurrence Of A Defect Within The Manufacturing  Process Requires Time To Verify, Analyze, Repair And Re-verify Average Cycle Time Per Unit Is Directly Proportional To The  Total Number Of Defects Per Unit Cycle Time  = Work In Process Throughput
#1 #6 #2 #7 #5 #9 #4 #8 #3 #10 Final  Insp.. Process Yield is 93.17% - Right?????? A FACTORY WITH 10 PROCESSES NOT QUITE!!! 1200 Good  & 88 Bad Items [93.2% Found OK]
COMPARISON OF YIELDS Y =  S U =  =  .931677   S = Number of Units That Pass U = Number of Units Tested Throughput Yield Analysis Tells Us Y TPI  =  .47774 .4774    .932 Why Not??? 1200 1288
ROLLED THROUGHPUT YIELD Operation Defects Units DPU (D/U) Throughput Yield (Y TPI  =  e -D/U   =  e -DPU ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5 75 18 72 6 28 82 70 35 88 523 851 334 1202 252 243 943 894 234 1200 0.00956 0.08813 0.05389 0.05990 0.02381 0.11523 0.08696 0.07830 0.14957 0.07333 0.99049 0.91564 0.94753 0.94186 0.97647 0.89116 0.91672 0.92469 0.86108 0.92929 Sum of  Operation Steps  = 479  6676  0.73868  0.47774 (Y RT ) 47.9  667.6  0.07387  0.73868 =TDPU TDPU = -ln(Y RT ) Avg.. of Operation Steps =
HOW MANY UNITS PRODUCED? UNITS PRODUCED = 1 + (1 -  e -DPU ) = 1 + (1 -  e -73868 ) = 1 + (1 - .477744) = 1 + .5222558 = 1.52 To Achieve 100 Conforming Units, 152 ( 1.52  X  100)  Would Need To Be Produced
INSPECTIONS AND TESTS
Inspection  E = 0.8 Escaping  DPU Level Observed DPU Level Submitted  DPU Level QUANTIFICATION OF DEFECTS Given: Observed Defects = DPU of 0.25 Then: Submitted Defects = (0.25/0.8) = DPU of 0.31 Escaping Defects = (0.31-0.25) = DPU of 0.06
A TYPICAL PROCESS Operation 1 INSP TEST Prior  Operation d o d 1 d 2 di dt dn Operation 2 d o  = Defects Escaping Prior Process d 1  = Defects Added in Operation 1 d 2  = Defects Added in Operation 2 d i  = Defects Found by Inspection & Corrected d t  = Defects Found by Test and Corrected d n  = Defects Escaping to Next Operation
Op. 1 INSP TEST Op 2 DPU = 0.349 DPU = 0.907 DPU = 0.420 DPU = 0.075 DPU = 0.07 From Prior Process DPU = 0.279 DPU = 0.558 DPU = 0.487 DPU = 0.345 PD = Part Defective = 800 PPM SC = Solder Defective = 300 PPM PA = Part Assembly Error = 1000 PPM EFF: PA = .8 PD = .0 SC = .8 EFF: PA = .9 PD  = .95 SC  = .05 To Next Process DEFECT-BASED PLANNING FOR A TYPICAL PROCESS
DEFECT-BASED PLANNING FOR A TYPICAL PROCESS Total Observed Defects Per Unit = 0.832 Rolled Yield = 43.52% Operation 1 Operation 2 Inspection  Test # Parts PD PA SC TDU FTY Submitted Created Submitted Created Submitted Observed Submitted Observed 100 330 0.080 0.100 0.099 0.279 210 600 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.13 0.120 0.099 0.349 0.168 0.210 0.180 0.558 0.298 0.330 0.279 0.907 0.000 0.264 0.223 0.487 61.44% 0.298 0.066 0.056 0.420 0.283 0.059 0.003 0.345 70.82% Escaping 0.015 0.007 0.053 0.075
REVIEW THE THREE PHASES  OF PRODUCT LIFE Early Life Useful Life Wear Out PROB. OF  FAILURE
EARLY LIFE FAILURE RATE  & LATENT DEFECTS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
PROBABLE TIME TO FAILURE  &  DEGREE OF ABNORMALITY  Gross Moderate Slight Degree of Abnormality Probable Time to Cause Failure
MAJOR CAUSE  OF LATENT DEFECTS The Design And Execution Of Processes  Is The Major Cause of Latent Defects Cpk - Major Cause of the Degree of Abnormality The Average Number of Latent Defects Per Unit -  Determines the Shape of Early Life Failure Rate Curve
WHAT CAN BE DONE TO MINIMIZE LATENT DEFECTS? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
MINIMIZATION OF OTHER FAILURE TYPES? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
TOTAL DEFECTS PER UNIT  (TDU) TDU =   DPU For All Key Characteristics +   DPU For All Component Part Defects +   DPU For All Process Defects WHERE: Key Characteristics Are Measured By C p  & C pk Component Part Defects Are Defects Found In  Material From Suppliers. Process Defects - Created As Product Goes  Through Manufacturing Process
DPU AS A  DEFECT BUDGETING TOOL Defect Budgeting Is A Method To Ensure Robust Product Design A Robust Design Will Be Insensitive To Long-term Process & Material Variations & Product Misuse Goal Of Defect Budgeting For A New  Product/process Is A Lower TDU
OVERVIEW OF THE  DEFECT BUDGETING PROCESS Structured Process Flow Diagram - All Inspection /Test Points - Flow Of Non-conforming Product Determine Capability/Error Rate Of Existing Process Establish Maximum DPU Level For Delivered Product Work Backwards & Establish Maximum DPUs  Revise Process Flow  - Add Inspection/test Points - Redesign Operations
BENCHMARKING AGAINST  BEST IN CLASS Determine Factors Critical To Long-term Success Compare Performance With Toughest Competitors Or Others Use Info to Develop Strategies And Functional Standards The Goal Of Benchmarking Is: - Exceed The Competition - Make Your Business The Very Best
EQUIVALENT COMPARISONS IN BENCHMARKING ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
DEFECTS PER MILLION  OPPORTUNITIES (DPMO) DPMO =  DPU x 1,000,000 Parts Count DPMO =  DPU x 1,000,000 Average Opportunities  For Error in One Unit
BENCHMARKING THE PROCESS 1.  Define The Purpose Of The Project 2.  Define A Unit 3.  Determine The Number Of Opportunities For Error In A Unit - For Manufactured Product - Other Than Manufactured Product 4. Measure The Total Defects Per Unit (DPU) 5. Calculate Defects Per Million Opportunities (DPMO) 6. Estimate Specification Width
BENCHMARKING AGAINST  BEST IN CLASS 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1K 10K 100K 2 3 4 5 6 7 .67 1.0 1.33 1.67 2.0 Sigma Cpk DPMO Specification Width    1.5 Sigma Shift Centered
PROCESS CYCLE TIME
PROCESS CYCLE TIME Time To Do An Entire Process Could Be Time From Material Arriving To Final Product  In Customer’s Hands Real Process Time Includes Waiting, Storage & In-between Operations Times. Theoretical Process Time - No Waiting Compare Real And Theoretical Process Time Reducing Real Process Cycle Time Can Reduce The  Number Of Defective Units And Improve Process Performance
THEORETICAL  PROCESS CYCLE TIME Theoretical Process  Cycle Time  Real Daily Operating Time Number of Units  Required Daily =
TEST/INSPECTION WORK LOAD  NONREPARIABLE PRODUCT Failure Of Test Or Inspection - Item Must Be Scrapped. To Yield One Acceptable Unit, We Must Test/inspect  A Larger Number Of Units 1 YIELD Starts =  =  e  DPU The Number of Parts  Required to Start (T) =  e  -DPU 1 Test/Inspection Cycle Time  =  T  x  Time Per Test =  (e  DPU )  x  time Per Test
TEST WORK LOAD  REPARIABLE PRODUCT One Test Required To Catch Each Defect Another Test Required To Pass Repaired Unit T = Number Of Tests Per Accepted Unit T = (1+DPU) Test Cycle Time  = T  x  Time Per Test = (1 + DPU)  x  Time Per Test
EXAMPLE OF TEST WORK LOAD FOR REPAIRABLE PRODUCT FTY = 187/234  =  80% TDU = 62/234  =  0.265 FTY  =  e -0.265   =  77% TDU  =  -ln(0.80)  =  0.233 Observed Results: Estimated From Observations Results Close Enough - Defects Randomly Distributed & Poisson Ok Number Of Tests Number  Of Units Number Of Defects Total Number Of Tests 1 2 3 4 187 35 9 3 234 0 35 18 9 62 187 70 27 12 296 Totals
INSPECTION  WORK LOAD  REPARIABLE PRODUCT ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],I = Number Of Inspections Per Accepted Unit I = 1 + (1 - Yield) =  1 + ( 1-  e  -DPU ) =  2 -  e  -DPU Inspection cycle time = I x Time Per Inspection = (2 -  e  -DPU ) x Time Per Inspection
ANALYZE WORK LOAD Every Unit Must Be Worked On Work Load Is Directly Proportional To Defects Per Unit Failures Analyzed One At A Time: Work Load = A = Analysis Per Unit = DPU Analysis Cycle Time = A x Time Per Analysis = DPU X Time Per Analysis Failures Analyzed All At One Time: Work Load = A = 1 -  e  -DPU Analysis cycle Time = A x Time Per Analysis = 1 -  e  -DPU  x time Per Analysis
REPAIR WORK LOAD For Failures Repaired One At a Time: Work Load = R = Repair Per Unit = DPU Repair Cycle time = R x Time Per Repair = DPU x Time Per Repair For Failure Repaired All At One Time: Work Load = R = 1 -  e  -DPU Repair Cycle time = R x Time Per Repair = 1 -  e  -DPU  x Time Per Repair
CYCLE TIME Test Analysis Repair Test Cycle Time   = (1+ DPU ) x Time Per Test Analysis Cycle Time = DPU x Time Per Analysis or  = 1- e -DPU  x Time Per Analysis Repair Time = DPU x Time Per Repair or = 1- e -DPU  x Time Per Repair
Stores and Bank Time Total Mfg.. Cycle Time  Queue, Run, and Changeover Time Output (capacity) Input CYCLE TIME / INVENTORY RELATIONSHIPS
INVENTORY AND  THROUGHPUT RATE How  Are Inventory and Cycle Time Related? Cycle Time =  Number of Days =  Inventory Throughput Rate Total # of Pieces in Stock Pieces Processed Per day
UNIVERSAL CYCLE TIME/ INVENTORY RELATIONSHIP Work -In-process Inventory =  Throughput Rate x Cycle Time Number Of  Work Orders Number Of Pieces Dollars Orders Per Day Pieces Per Day Dollars Per Day # Of Days # Of Days # Of Days Inventory Throughput Rate Cycle Time Examples
CYCLE TIME CONTROLS  WIP INVENTORY The Longer A Unit Of Product Remains In A Production Area, The Higher The Work In Process (WIP) Inventory Is In That Area Time Unit Is Expected To Remain In Area =  Average Total Time
Raw Material  Stores Fabrication Fabrication Stores Sub- Assembly Sub- Assembly Stores Final Assembly Finished Goods Inventory Work-In-Process Manufacturing Cycle Time Inventory Carrying Cost Total Value of  Product Raw Materials  Acquisition Finished  Goods Shipment TRUE COST OF INVENTORY $
CYCLE TIME AND  INVENTORY TURNS An Inventory Turn Is An Index Or Indicator Of How Often A Company’s Entire Inventory Stock Is Replaced Cost Of Goods Sold Average Annual Inventory Turns = 1.25 1.44 5.00 10.00 20.00 40.00 288 250 72 36 18 9 Turns Turn Days Note: Dell Has been Able to Achieve 1440 Turns
INVENTORY COST  AT MOTOROLA Inventory Carrying Cost Equals At Least 25% of the  Value of Average Annual Inventory Levels In 1991, This cost can be compared to taking $310 million  and burning it , since it adds no value to the company Year Sales Average Annual Inventory Levels Inventory Carrying Costs 1987 1989 1991 1995 $6,700,000,000 $9,620,000,000 $11,340,000,000 $27,037,000,000 $909,000,000 $1,158,000,000 $1,242,000,000 $3,528,000,000 $227,000,000 $289,000,000 $310,500,000 $882,000,000
THE BOTTOM LINE IMPACT In 1987, Motorola Discovered That  Poor Quality Accounted For Approximately 25% Of Their Annual Inventory Carrying Costs. This Expense Added No Value, It Was Just Like Taking $250,000,000 and pouring it down a drain … .Annually!
OVERALL MANUFACTURING  COST AND DPU Defects Cost Money as Result Of: Diagnostic Time Repair Time / Re-Inspection Extra Labor Extra Materials Extra Capacity Extra Support Extra Management Extra Inventory Cost of Failure (Internal) = DPU  x  Volume  x   Average Cost Defect
REDUCING CYCLE TIME &  INVENTORY SUMMARY Cycle Time & Inventory Are Key Competitive Factors Cycle Time Is The Inverse Of Inventory Turns (Shorter Cycle Times = Lower Inventories) Defects Have A Major Controlling Effect Defect Must Be Analyzed And Repaired Two Important Work Load Measures - Test & Inspection, And Analyze & Repair Capacity Of Test / Inspection Equipment Is Inversely Proportional To Work Load

More Related Content

What's hot

Ch12 jit+&+lean+systems
Ch12 jit+&+lean+systemsCh12 jit+&+lean+systems
Ch12 jit+&+lean+systems
videoaakash15
 
Total Productive Maintenance
Total Productive MaintenanceTotal Productive Maintenance
Total Productive Maintenance
DEEPAK SAHOO
 
Scheduling
SchedulingScheduling
Scheduling
jaya_22
 

What's hot (20)

Ch12 jit+&+lean+systems
Ch12 jit+&+lean+systemsCh12 jit+&+lean+systems
Ch12 jit+&+lean+systems
 
Chapter 8 aggregate planning in a supply chain
Chapter 8 aggregate planning in a supply chainChapter 8 aggregate planning in a supply chain
Chapter 8 aggregate planning in a supply chain
 
Avion, inc. a case study
Avion, inc. a case studyAvion, inc. a case study
Avion, inc. a case study
 
12 lean manufacturing
12 lean manufacturing12 lean manufacturing
12 lean manufacturing
 
Cellular LayOut
Cellular LayOutCellular LayOut
Cellular LayOut
 
Jidoka by Operational Excellence Consulting
Jidoka by Operational Excellence ConsultingJidoka by Operational Excellence Consulting
Jidoka by Operational Excellence Consulting
 
Cycle time
Cycle timeCycle time
Cycle time
 
Total Productive Maintenance
Total Productive MaintenanceTotal Productive Maintenance
Total Productive Maintenance
 
16 big losses for manufacturing and services
16 big losses for manufacturing and services16 big losses for manufacturing and services
16 big losses for manufacturing and services
 
Dfma
DfmaDfma
Dfma
 
Lean Manufacturing - Toyota Production System
Lean Manufacturing - Toyota Production SystemLean Manufacturing - Toyota Production System
Lean Manufacturing - Toyota Production System
 
Scheduling
SchedulingScheduling
Scheduling
 
Total productive maintenance
Total productive maintenanceTotal productive maintenance
Total productive maintenance
 
How to reduce changeover loss
How to reduce changeover lossHow to reduce changeover loss
How to reduce changeover loss
 
SMED-Observation Training
SMED-Observation TrainingSMED-Observation Training
SMED-Observation Training
 
History of Toyota Production System (TPS)
History of Toyota Production System (TPS)History of Toyota Production System (TPS)
History of Toyota Production System (TPS)
 
Man and machine chart
Man and machine chartMan and machine chart
Man and machine chart
 
SMED - Quick Change Over
SMED - Quick Change OverSMED - Quick Change Over
SMED - Quick Change Over
 
cycle time optimization in injection moulding
cycle time optimization in injection mouldingcycle time optimization in injection moulding
cycle time optimization in injection moulding
 
Process strategy ppt @ bec doms
Process strategy ppt @ bec domsProcess strategy ppt @ bec doms
Process strategy ppt @ bec doms
 

Viewers also liked

Basic Six Sigma Presentation
Basic Six Sigma PresentationBasic Six Sigma Presentation
Basic Six Sigma Presentation
vivekissar
 
What+Is+Six+Sigma
What+Is+Six+SigmaWhat+Is+Six+Sigma
What+Is+Six+Sigma
Tyg Lucas
 
8799568 lean-manufacturing
8799568 lean-manufacturing8799568 lean-manufacturing
8799568 lean-manufacturing
truongngv
 
Ky nang-to-chuc-cong-viec
Ky nang-to-chuc-cong-viecKy nang-to-chuc-cong-viec
Ky nang-to-chuc-cong-viec
Xuan Le
 
He thong quan_ly_6_sigma
He thong quan_ly_6_sigmaHe thong quan_ly_6_sigma
He thong quan_ly_6_sigma
Ngô Thông
 
Kaizen cho quản lý triết lý hành động - kaizen philosophies
Kaizen cho quản lý   triết lý hành động - kaizen philosophiesKaizen cho quản lý   triết lý hành động - kaizen philosophies
Kaizen cho quản lý triết lý hành động - kaizen philosophies
KAIZEN Group Experts
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Six sigma-tools
Six sigma-toolsSix sigma-tools
Six sigma-tools
 
Basic Six Sigma Presentation
Basic Six Sigma PresentationBasic Six Sigma Presentation
Basic Six Sigma Presentation
 
What+Is+Six+Sigma
What+Is+Six+SigmaWhat+Is+Six+Sigma
What+Is+Six+Sigma
 
İkinci El Komple Eşya Alımı
İkinci El Komple Eşya Alımıİkinci El Komple Eşya Alımı
İkinci El Komple Eşya Alımı
 
Mission Bo Kv3
Mission Bo Kv3Mission Bo Kv3
Mission Bo Kv3
 
Tai lieu danh_gia
Tai lieu danh_giaTai lieu danh_gia
Tai lieu danh_gia
 
8799568 lean-manufacturing
8799568 lean-manufacturing8799568 lean-manufacturing
8799568 lean-manufacturing
 
O P450
O P450O P450
O P450
 
Fsfinalbook single
Fsfinalbook singleFsfinalbook single
Fsfinalbook single
 
Bạn có máu phát minh không ?
Bạn có máu phát minh không ?Bạn có máu phát minh không ?
Bạn có máu phát minh không ?
 
Kaizen full
Kaizen fullKaizen full
Kaizen full
 
Kaizen 2 full
Kaizen 2 fullKaizen 2 full
Kaizen 2 full
 
Why you still stay fat
Why you still stay fatWhy you still stay fat
Why you still stay fat
 
Motion Study
Motion StudyMotion Study
Motion Study
 
6 sigma introduction to lean manufacturing - vietnamese
6 sigma introduction to lean manufacturing - vietnamese6 sigma introduction to lean manufacturing - vietnamese
6 sigma introduction to lean manufacturing - vietnamese
 
Ky nang-to-chuc-cong-viec
Ky nang-to-chuc-cong-viecKy nang-to-chuc-cong-viec
Ky nang-to-chuc-cong-viec
 
He thong quan_ly_6_sigma
He thong quan_ly_6_sigmaHe thong quan_ly_6_sigma
He thong quan_ly_6_sigma
 
Kaizen cho quản lý triết lý hành động - kaizen philosophies
Kaizen cho quản lý   triết lý hành động - kaizen philosophiesKaizen cho quản lý   triết lý hành động - kaizen philosophies
Kaizen cho quản lý triết lý hành động - kaizen philosophies
 
VISUAL CONTROLS - Mieruka
VISUAL CONTROLS - MierukaVISUAL CONTROLS - Mieruka
VISUAL CONTROLS - Mieruka
 
[Công nghệ may] giới thiệu về lean manufacturing
[Công nghệ may] giới thiệu về lean manufacturing[Công nghệ may] giới thiệu về lean manufacturing
[Công nghệ may] giới thiệu về lean manufacturing
 

Similar to Cairo 01 Six Sigma Measure

D3 ver oee 3bus094475 l en_oee_white_paper_low_resolution
D3 ver oee 3bus094475 l en_oee_white_paper_low_resolutionD3 ver oee 3bus094475 l en_oee_white_paper_low_resolution
D3 ver oee 3bus094475 l en_oee_white_paper_low_resolution
Mannyjg5
 
Top Metrics for Agile @Agile NCR2011
Top Metrics for Agile @Agile NCR2011Top Metrics for Agile @Agile NCR2011
Top Metrics for Agile @Agile NCR2011
Priyank Pathak
 
Failure modes effect analysis
Failure modes effect analysisFailure modes effect analysis
Failure modes effect analysis
rashmi322
 

Similar to Cairo 01 Six Sigma Measure (20)

Implementation of 5S and KOBETSU KAIZEN (TPM Pillar) in a Manufacturing Organ...
Implementation of 5S and KOBETSU KAIZEN (TPM Pillar) in a Manufacturing Organ...Implementation of 5S and KOBETSU KAIZEN (TPM Pillar) in a Manufacturing Organ...
Implementation of 5S and KOBETSU KAIZEN (TPM Pillar) in a Manufacturing Organ...
 
IRJET- A Case Study for Overall Equipment Effectiveness Improved in Manufactu...
IRJET- A Case Study for Overall Equipment Effectiveness Improved in Manufactu...IRJET- A Case Study for Overall Equipment Effectiveness Improved in Manufactu...
IRJET- A Case Study for Overall Equipment Effectiveness Improved in Manufactu...
 
Isa saint-louis-exceptional-opportunities-short-course-day-2
Isa saint-louis-exceptional-opportunities-short-course-day-2Isa saint-louis-exceptional-opportunities-short-course-day-2
Isa saint-louis-exceptional-opportunities-short-course-day-2
 
Modernization Lessons Learned -Part 2
Modernization Lessons Learned -Part 2Modernization Lessons Learned -Part 2
Modernization Lessons Learned -Part 2
 
A038301010
A038301010A038301010
A038301010
 
om
omom
om
 
Work measurement
Work measurementWork measurement
Work measurement
 
Test Metrics
Test MetricsTest Metrics
Test Metrics
 
D3 ver oee 3bus094475 l en_oee_white_paper_low_resolution
D3 ver oee 3bus094475 l en_oee_white_paper_low_resolutionD3 ver oee 3bus094475 l en_oee_white_paper_low_resolution
D3 ver oee 3bus094475 l en_oee_white_paper_low_resolution
 
Optimal+ GSA 2014
Optimal+ GSA  2014Optimal+ GSA  2014
Optimal+ GSA 2014
 
IRJET- Productivity Improvement in Manufacturing Industry using Lean Tools
IRJET- Productivity Improvement in Manufacturing Industry using Lean ToolsIRJET- Productivity Improvement in Manufacturing Industry using Lean Tools
IRJET- Productivity Improvement in Manufacturing Industry using Lean Tools
 
Process Capability: Step 4 (Normal Distributions)
Process Capability: Step 4 (Normal Distributions)Process Capability: Step 4 (Normal Distributions)
Process Capability: Step 4 (Normal Distributions)
 
Top Metrics for Agile @Agile NCR2011
Top Metrics for Agile @Agile NCR2011Top Metrics for Agile @Agile NCR2011
Top Metrics for Agile @Agile NCR2011
 
Cs 568 Spring 10 Lecture 5 Estimation
Cs 568 Spring 10  Lecture 5 EstimationCs 568 Spring 10  Lecture 5 Estimation
Cs 568 Spring 10 Lecture 5 Estimation
 
PLC problem troubleshooting
PLC problem troubleshooting PLC problem troubleshooting
PLC problem troubleshooting
 
FMICA ppt
FMICA pptFMICA ppt
FMICA ppt
 
OEE
OEEOEE
OEE
 
Failure modes effect analysis
Failure modes effect analysisFailure modes effect analysis
Failure modes effect analysis
 
Unit 3
Unit 3Unit 3
Unit 3
 
PID Control of True Integrating Processes - Greg McMillan Deminar
PID Control of True Integrating Processes - Greg McMillan DeminarPID Control of True Integrating Processes - Greg McMillan Deminar
PID Control of True Integrating Processes - Greg McMillan Deminar
 

More from ahmad bassiouny (20)

Work Study & Productivity
Work Study & ProductivityWork Study & Productivity
Work Study & Productivity
 
Work Study
Work StudyWork Study
Work Study
 
Motion And Time Study
Motion And Time StudyMotion And Time Study
Motion And Time Study
 
The Christmas Story
The Christmas StoryThe Christmas Story
The Christmas Story
 
Turkey Photos
Turkey PhotosTurkey Photos
Turkey Photos
 
Miramar
MiramarMiramar
Miramar
 
Mom
MomMom
Mom
 
Linearization
LinearizationLinearization
Linearization
 
Kblmt B000 Intro Kaizen Based Lean Manufacturing
Kblmt B000 Intro Kaizen Based Lean ManufacturingKblmt B000 Intro Kaizen Based Lean Manufacturing
Kblmt B000 Intro Kaizen Based Lean Manufacturing
 
How To Survive
How To SurviveHow To Survive
How To Survive
 
Dad
DadDad
Dad
 
Ancient Hieroglyphics
Ancient HieroglyphicsAncient Hieroglyphics
Ancient Hieroglyphics
 
Dubai In 2009
Dubai In 2009Dubai In 2009
Dubai In 2009
 
DesignPeopleSystem
DesignPeopleSystemDesignPeopleSystem
DesignPeopleSystem
 
Organizational Behavior
Organizational BehaviorOrganizational Behavior
Organizational Behavior
 
Work Study Workshop
Work Study WorkshopWork Study Workshop
Work Study Workshop
 
Workstudy
WorkstudyWorkstudy
Workstudy
 
Time And Motion Study
Time And  Motion  StudyTime And  Motion  Study
Time And Motion Study
 
_olympic
_olympic_olympic
_olympic
 
_Egypt
_Egypt_Egypt
_Egypt
 

Recently uploaded

Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and MythsArtificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Joaquim Jorge
 
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slideHistor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
vu2urc
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
 
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘
🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘
 
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
 
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law DevelopmentsTrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
 
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
 
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and MythsArtificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
 
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfBoost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
 
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
 
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CV
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CVReal Time Object Detection Using Open CV
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CV
 
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slideHistor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, AdobeApidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
 
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonData Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
 
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
 
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdfTech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
 
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemkeProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot TakeoffStrategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
 
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
 

Cairo 01 Six Sigma Measure

  • 2.
  • 4. DEFININITIONS Number Of Operation Steps = m Defects = D Unit = U Opportunities For A Defect = O Yield = Y Nomenclature Total Opportunities (TOP) = U X O Defects Per Unit (DPU) = D/U Defects Per Unit Opportunity (DPO) = DPU/O = D/(U X O) Defects Per Million Opportunities (DPMO) = DPO X 10 6 Basic Relationships
  • 5. DISTRIBUTION OF DEFECTS IN MANUFACTURED PRODUCT Non-Randomly Occurring Defect Randomly Occurring Defect Example Result Conclusion Wrong part in manual insertion parts bin Every board contains same wrong part in same location. Defects are easier to detect/diagnose & are less likely to be sent to next operation Mixed parts in manual insertion parts bin. Probability of a board containing wrong part is equal to proportion of wrong parts in bin Defects are harder to detect/diagnose and are more likely to be sent to next operation
  • 6. PROBABILITY OF DEFECTS IN MANUFACTURED PRODUCT GIVEN: (1) Average DPU For This Product Is One (DPU=1) (2) Defects are randomly distributed What Is The Probability of Zero Defects In This Unit?
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9. PREDICTING THE QUALITY OF PRODUCTS FTY = e -DPU DPU = -ln FTY Estimation of units containing “q’ defects (where “q” is not limited to zero) If we use the Poisson distribution Becomes (DPU) q e -DPU q!  x e -  x! P{x} =
  • 10. YIELD RELATIONSHIPS Throughput Yield : Y TP = e -DPU Defects Per Unit: DPU = -ln(Y) Rolled Throughput Yield: Y RT =  Y TP i Total Defects Per Unit: TDPU = -ln(Y RT ) Normalized Yield: Y norm =  Defects per Normalized Unit: DPU norm = -ln(Y norm ) i =1 m Y RT m
  • 11. YIELD Probability with zero defects Specification Limit Probability of Defect = 1 - e -DPU Yield = e -DPU Y = P(x = 0) = e-   x x! e-  = = e -D/U = e -DPU
  • 13. THE HIDDEN FACTORY Customer Quality Operation Not OK Scrap Verify Rework Operation Not OK Scrap Verify Rework Y tp Throughput Yield Y tp Throughput Yield Non-Value Added (The Hidden Factory) Value Added (The Visible Factory) Producers Quality Supplier Quality Y rt =  Y tpi m i=10
  • 14. IMPLICATIONS OF THE HIDDEN FACTORY Y e e TP DPU      3679 1 0 . = 1.6321 . 1.63 Equivalent Units Must Be Produced To Get Out 1 Good Unit Every Occurrence Of A Defect Within The Manufacturing Process Requires Time To Verify, Analyze, Repair And Re-verify Average Cycle Time Per Unit Is Directly Proportional To The Total Number Of Defects Per Unit Cycle Time = Work In Process Throughput
  • 15. #1 #6 #2 #7 #5 #9 #4 #8 #3 #10 Final Insp.. Process Yield is 93.17% - Right?????? A FACTORY WITH 10 PROCESSES NOT QUITE!!! 1200 Good & 88 Bad Items [93.2% Found OK]
  • 16. COMPARISON OF YIELDS Y = S U = = .931677 S = Number of Units That Pass U = Number of Units Tested Throughput Yield Analysis Tells Us Y TPI = .47774 .4774  .932 Why Not??? 1200 1288
  • 17. ROLLED THROUGHPUT YIELD Operation Defects Units DPU (D/U) Throughput Yield (Y TPI = e -D/U = e -DPU ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5 75 18 72 6 28 82 70 35 88 523 851 334 1202 252 243 943 894 234 1200 0.00956 0.08813 0.05389 0.05990 0.02381 0.11523 0.08696 0.07830 0.14957 0.07333 0.99049 0.91564 0.94753 0.94186 0.97647 0.89116 0.91672 0.92469 0.86108 0.92929 Sum of Operation Steps = 479 6676 0.73868 0.47774 (Y RT ) 47.9 667.6 0.07387 0.73868 =TDPU TDPU = -ln(Y RT ) Avg.. of Operation Steps =
  • 18. HOW MANY UNITS PRODUCED? UNITS PRODUCED = 1 + (1 - e -DPU ) = 1 + (1 - e -73868 ) = 1 + (1 - .477744) = 1 + .5222558 = 1.52 To Achieve 100 Conforming Units, 152 ( 1.52 X 100) Would Need To Be Produced
  • 20. Inspection E = 0.8 Escaping DPU Level Observed DPU Level Submitted DPU Level QUANTIFICATION OF DEFECTS Given: Observed Defects = DPU of 0.25 Then: Submitted Defects = (0.25/0.8) = DPU of 0.31 Escaping Defects = (0.31-0.25) = DPU of 0.06
  • 21. A TYPICAL PROCESS Operation 1 INSP TEST Prior Operation d o d 1 d 2 di dt dn Operation 2 d o = Defects Escaping Prior Process d 1 = Defects Added in Operation 1 d 2 = Defects Added in Operation 2 d i = Defects Found by Inspection & Corrected d t = Defects Found by Test and Corrected d n = Defects Escaping to Next Operation
  • 22. Op. 1 INSP TEST Op 2 DPU = 0.349 DPU = 0.907 DPU = 0.420 DPU = 0.075 DPU = 0.07 From Prior Process DPU = 0.279 DPU = 0.558 DPU = 0.487 DPU = 0.345 PD = Part Defective = 800 PPM SC = Solder Defective = 300 PPM PA = Part Assembly Error = 1000 PPM EFF: PA = .8 PD = .0 SC = .8 EFF: PA = .9 PD = .95 SC = .05 To Next Process DEFECT-BASED PLANNING FOR A TYPICAL PROCESS
  • 23. DEFECT-BASED PLANNING FOR A TYPICAL PROCESS Total Observed Defects Per Unit = 0.832 Rolled Yield = 43.52% Operation 1 Operation 2 Inspection Test # Parts PD PA SC TDU FTY Submitted Created Submitted Created Submitted Observed Submitted Observed 100 330 0.080 0.100 0.099 0.279 210 600 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.13 0.120 0.099 0.349 0.168 0.210 0.180 0.558 0.298 0.330 0.279 0.907 0.000 0.264 0.223 0.487 61.44% 0.298 0.066 0.056 0.420 0.283 0.059 0.003 0.345 70.82% Escaping 0.015 0.007 0.053 0.075
  • 24. REVIEW THE THREE PHASES OF PRODUCT LIFE Early Life Useful Life Wear Out PROB. OF FAILURE
  • 25.
  • 26. PROBABLE TIME TO FAILURE & DEGREE OF ABNORMALITY Gross Moderate Slight Degree of Abnormality Probable Time to Cause Failure
  • 27. MAJOR CAUSE OF LATENT DEFECTS The Design And Execution Of Processes Is The Major Cause of Latent Defects Cpk - Major Cause of the Degree of Abnormality The Average Number of Latent Defects Per Unit - Determines the Shape of Early Life Failure Rate Curve
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30. TOTAL DEFECTS PER UNIT (TDU) TDU =  DPU For All Key Characteristics +  DPU For All Component Part Defects +  DPU For All Process Defects WHERE: Key Characteristics Are Measured By C p & C pk Component Part Defects Are Defects Found In Material From Suppliers. Process Defects - Created As Product Goes Through Manufacturing Process
  • 31. DPU AS A DEFECT BUDGETING TOOL Defect Budgeting Is A Method To Ensure Robust Product Design A Robust Design Will Be Insensitive To Long-term Process & Material Variations & Product Misuse Goal Of Defect Budgeting For A New Product/process Is A Lower TDU
  • 32. OVERVIEW OF THE DEFECT BUDGETING PROCESS Structured Process Flow Diagram - All Inspection /Test Points - Flow Of Non-conforming Product Determine Capability/Error Rate Of Existing Process Establish Maximum DPU Level For Delivered Product Work Backwards & Establish Maximum DPUs Revise Process Flow - Add Inspection/test Points - Redesign Operations
  • 33. BENCHMARKING AGAINST BEST IN CLASS Determine Factors Critical To Long-term Success Compare Performance With Toughest Competitors Or Others Use Info to Develop Strategies And Functional Standards The Goal Of Benchmarking Is: - Exceed The Competition - Make Your Business The Very Best
  • 34.
  • 35. DEFECTS PER MILLION OPPORTUNITIES (DPMO) DPMO = DPU x 1,000,000 Parts Count DPMO = DPU x 1,000,000 Average Opportunities For Error in One Unit
  • 36. BENCHMARKING THE PROCESS 1. Define The Purpose Of The Project 2. Define A Unit 3. Determine The Number Of Opportunities For Error In A Unit - For Manufactured Product - Other Than Manufactured Product 4. Measure The Total Defects Per Unit (DPU) 5. Calculate Defects Per Million Opportunities (DPMO) 6. Estimate Specification Width
  • 37. BENCHMARKING AGAINST BEST IN CLASS 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1K 10K 100K 2 3 4 5 6 7 .67 1.0 1.33 1.67 2.0 Sigma Cpk DPMO Specification Width  1.5 Sigma Shift Centered
  • 39. PROCESS CYCLE TIME Time To Do An Entire Process Could Be Time From Material Arriving To Final Product In Customer’s Hands Real Process Time Includes Waiting, Storage & In-between Operations Times. Theoretical Process Time - No Waiting Compare Real And Theoretical Process Time Reducing Real Process Cycle Time Can Reduce The Number Of Defective Units And Improve Process Performance
  • 40. THEORETICAL PROCESS CYCLE TIME Theoretical Process Cycle Time Real Daily Operating Time Number of Units Required Daily =
  • 41. TEST/INSPECTION WORK LOAD NONREPARIABLE PRODUCT Failure Of Test Or Inspection - Item Must Be Scrapped. To Yield One Acceptable Unit, We Must Test/inspect A Larger Number Of Units 1 YIELD Starts = = e DPU The Number of Parts Required to Start (T) = e -DPU 1 Test/Inspection Cycle Time = T x Time Per Test = (e DPU ) x time Per Test
  • 42. TEST WORK LOAD REPARIABLE PRODUCT One Test Required To Catch Each Defect Another Test Required To Pass Repaired Unit T = Number Of Tests Per Accepted Unit T = (1+DPU) Test Cycle Time = T x Time Per Test = (1 + DPU) x Time Per Test
  • 43. EXAMPLE OF TEST WORK LOAD FOR REPAIRABLE PRODUCT FTY = 187/234 = 80% TDU = 62/234 = 0.265 FTY = e -0.265 = 77% TDU = -ln(0.80) = 0.233 Observed Results: Estimated From Observations Results Close Enough - Defects Randomly Distributed & Poisson Ok Number Of Tests Number Of Units Number Of Defects Total Number Of Tests 1 2 3 4 187 35 9 3 234 0 35 18 9 62 187 70 27 12 296 Totals
  • 44.
  • 45. ANALYZE WORK LOAD Every Unit Must Be Worked On Work Load Is Directly Proportional To Defects Per Unit Failures Analyzed One At A Time: Work Load = A = Analysis Per Unit = DPU Analysis Cycle Time = A x Time Per Analysis = DPU X Time Per Analysis Failures Analyzed All At One Time: Work Load = A = 1 - e -DPU Analysis cycle Time = A x Time Per Analysis = 1 - e -DPU x time Per Analysis
  • 46. REPAIR WORK LOAD For Failures Repaired One At a Time: Work Load = R = Repair Per Unit = DPU Repair Cycle time = R x Time Per Repair = DPU x Time Per Repair For Failure Repaired All At One Time: Work Load = R = 1 - e -DPU Repair Cycle time = R x Time Per Repair = 1 - e -DPU x Time Per Repair
  • 47. CYCLE TIME Test Analysis Repair Test Cycle Time = (1+ DPU ) x Time Per Test Analysis Cycle Time = DPU x Time Per Analysis or = 1- e -DPU x Time Per Analysis Repair Time = DPU x Time Per Repair or = 1- e -DPU x Time Per Repair
  • 48. Stores and Bank Time Total Mfg.. Cycle Time Queue, Run, and Changeover Time Output (capacity) Input CYCLE TIME / INVENTORY RELATIONSHIPS
  • 49. INVENTORY AND THROUGHPUT RATE How Are Inventory and Cycle Time Related? Cycle Time = Number of Days = Inventory Throughput Rate Total # of Pieces in Stock Pieces Processed Per day
  • 50. UNIVERSAL CYCLE TIME/ INVENTORY RELATIONSHIP Work -In-process Inventory = Throughput Rate x Cycle Time Number Of Work Orders Number Of Pieces Dollars Orders Per Day Pieces Per Day Dollars Per Day # Of Days # Of Days # Of Days Inventory Throughput Rate Cycle Time Examples
  • 51. CYCLE TIME CONTROLS WIP INVENTORY The Longer A Unit Of Product Remains In A Production Area, The Higher The Work In Process (WIP) Inventory Is In That Area Time Unit Is Expected To Remain In Area = Average Total Time
  • 52. Raw Material Stores Fabrication Fabrication Stores Sub- Assembly Sub- Assembly Stores Final Assembly Finished Goods Inventory Work-In-Process Manufacturing Cycle Time Inventory Carrying Cost Total Value of Product Raw Materials Acquisition Finished Goods Shipment TRUE COST OF INVENTORY $
  • 53. CYCLE TIME AND INVENTORY TURNS An Inventory Turn Is An Index Or Indicator Of How Often A Company’s Entire Inventory Stock Is Replaced Cost Of Goods Sold Average Annual Inventory Turns = 1.25 1.44 5.00 10.00 20.00 40.00 288 250 72 36 18 9 Turns Turn Days Note: Dell Has been Able to Achieve 1440 Turns
  • 54. INVENTORY COST AT MOTOROLA Inventory Carrying Cost Equals At Least 25% of the Value of Average Annual Inventory Levels In 1991, This cost can be compared to taking $310 million and burning it , since it adds no value to the company Year Sales Average Annual Inventory Levels Inventory Carrying Costs 1987 1989 1991 1995 $6,700,000,000 $9,620,000,000 $11,340,000,000 $27,037,000,000 $909,000,000 $1,158,000,000 $1,242,000,000 $3,528,000,000 $227,000,000 $289,000,000 $310,500,000 $882,000,000
  • 55. THE BOTTOM LINE IMPACT In 1987, Motorola Discovered That Poor Quality Accounted For Approximately 25% Of Their Annual Inventory Carrying Costs. This Expense Added No Value, It Was Just Like Taking $250,000,000 and pouring it down a drain … .Annually!
  • 56. OVERALL MANUFACTURING COST AND DPU Defects Cost Money as Result Of: Diagnostic Time Repair Time / Re-Inspection Extra Labor Extra Materials Extra Capacity Extra Support Extra Management Extra Inventory Cost of Failure (Internal) = DPU x Volume x Average Cost Defect
  • 57. REDUCING CYCLE TIME & INVENTORY SUMMARY Cycle Time & Inventory Are Key Competitive Factors Cycle Time Is The Inverse Of Inventory Turns (Shorter Cycle Times = Lower Inventories) Defects Have A Major Controlling Effect Defect Must Be Analyzed And Repaired Two Important Work Load Measures - Test & Inspection, And Analyze & Repair Capacity Of Test / Inspection Equipment Is Inversely Proportional To Work Load