The Invisible College of eTourism. A Case of ENTER Conference
1. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 1
The Invisible College of eTourism
A Case of ENTER Conference
Tianyu Ying
Shahab Pourfakhimi
University of Otago, New Zealand
Tianyu.ying@otago.ac.nz
Shahab.pourfakhimi@otago.ac.nz
www.otago.ac.nz/tourism
2. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 2
1386
HAVE PUBLISHED IN ENTER CONFERENCE 1994-2014
AUTHORS
4. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 4
THE INVISIBLE COLLEGE
of each field is the group of
INTER-CONNECTED
ACTIVE&
Researchers who form a
SOCIAL ORGANISATIONAs the backbone of research in any academic field
Price & Beaver (1966)
Crane (1969)
5. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 5
KNOWLEDGE DIFFUSION
AND ITS
DEVELOPMENT
ARE TO A LARGE DEGREE THE RESULT OF
THE SOCIAL PROCESS BETWEEN
THE MEMBERS OF THIS COLLEGE
Racherla & Hu (2010)
Hu & Racherla (2008)
6. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 6
PATTERNS & DYNAMICS
OF
KNOWLEDGE CREATION &
DIFFUSION
STUDY OF SUCH CONNECTIONS ENABLE US
TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THE
Baggio, Scott & Arcodia (2008)
Racherla & Hu (2010)
Hu & Racherla (2008)
7. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 7
KEY ACTORSBEHIND THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ACADEMIC FIELD
8. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 8
SOCIAL NETWORK
ANALYSIS
Baggio, Scott & Arcodia (2008)
Benckendorff (2011)
Racherla & Hu (2010)
Hu & Racherla (2008)
IS AN EFFECTIVE TOOL FOR SUCH AN INVESTIGATION
13. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 13
IN THE CASE OF ENTER COFERENCE
≈0.67θ ≈α≈0.66
66%of papers are produced by
9%
of total authors (125)
14. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 14
Continuous growth
Inclination of new authors to collaborate
with prolific authors
15. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 15
4.8ENTER AVERAGE DEGREE CENTRALITY
2.5TOURISM SCHOLARS BY BENCKENDORFF 2010
1.03EVENT PAPERS BY BAGGIO et. al. 2008
16. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 16
The Main Component
(572 nodes)
Isolates
(72 nodes)
Other
components
17. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 17
Papers 972
Authors (nodes) 1386
Mean paper per author (overall) 1.83
Mean author per paper (overall) 2.61
Number of components 251
Main component size 572
Links (collaboration relationships) 2895
Isolates (non-connected authors) 72
Mean degree centrality (collaborator per author) 4.18
Density 0.003
Mean distance 5.119
Mean betweenness (normalised) 0.051
Mean effective egonet size 1.7
Mean 2step reach 1.16
18. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 18
Minimum Connectivity Maximum Connectivity
Minimum Contribution
Maximum Contribution
High Contribution
High Connectivity
(52 nodes < 4%)
High Contribution
Less connectivity
(17 nodes > 1%)
Lower Contribution
High Connectivity
(9 nodes < 1%)
Lower Contribution
Less Connectivity
(1308 nodes 94.5%)
19. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 19
1
2
3
4
6
5
7
8
9
10 11
12
13
14
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Buhalis, D.
Law, R.
Fesenmaier, D.
Höpken, W.
Werthner, H.
Fuchs, M.
Ricci, F.
Gretzel, U.
Murphy, J.
Alzua-Sorzabal, A.
Lianza, M.
Zanker, M.
Schegg, R.
Cantoni, L.
Frew, A.
20. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 20
Critical and special role in academy
22. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 22
• Identifying the leading researchers of the eTourism
academy
• Understanding structure of collaborations in this field
• Visualise the academic network of our senior
researchers
• Assist young career researchers to develop their
network and position themselves
CONCLUSION
23. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 23
• Expanding scope to other sources of scientific
communication
• Citation, co-citation analysis is recommended
LIMITATION
24. ENTER 2015 Research Track Slide Number 24
IT ONLY REFLECTS THE ACTIVITY OF RESEARCHERS IN
THIS CONFERENCE, NOT THE WHOLE ACADEMIC
FIELD
IT DOES NOT MEASURE THE QUALITY OF
RESEARCH, BUT ONLY THE EXTENT OF THE
CONNECTIVITY AND CONTRIBUTION OF THE
SCHOLARS
CAUTION!!!