Growth and production performance of tade mullet, Liza tade (Forsskal, 1775) ...
The CPWF Big Picture
1. The Challenge Program on Water and Food
Big Picture
Assumptions, givens, strategic choices
Alain VIDAL, Basin Leader Meeting
Laos, 19. Jan. 2011
2. Global food crisis:
a poverty “countdown”
3 billion poor below US$2.5/day
2 billion suffer from malnutrition
1 billion suffer from hunger
75% of them are rural poor
Alleviating hunger means reducing rural poverty
Reducing rural poverty
Increase the income of the rural poor to enable
investment
Ensure they can cope with short-term and long-
term changes
3. The resilience challenge
Food production communities and ecosystems
should be able to cope with local and global
changes (climate, economy, demography,
migrations…), ie become more resilient
Achieved through improved water
productivity (more food with less water)
together with empowerment, equity,
market access, health and ecosystem
services
3
4. CPWF aims to increase the resilience of social and
ecological systems through better water management
for food production
Through its broad partnerships, it conducts research
that leads to impact on the poor and to policy change
4
6. Focusing our strategy – a quizz
Why, where and on what do we focus?
How long are we supposed to live?
What does one basin development program cost?
How many partners does it include?
7. Six basin development challenges
Andes – Benefit-sharing mechanisms
Ganges – Floods and salt in the Delta
Limpopo – Small reservoirs, rainwater and livelihoods
Mekong – Dams and livelihoods
Nile – Rainwater management in Ethiopia
Volta – Small reservoirs, rainwater and livelihoods
8. Cross-basin science
Topic working groups
Multiple-uses
Resilience
Learning to innovate
Global drivers
Others
Fed by and informing research done in basins
Progressively established in 2010-11
9. How we work
Guided by core principles:
working in partnership
adaptive management
capacity development
gender and interdisciplinary integration
accountability
Linking research to impact through compelling basin
development challenges and ‘outcome pathways’
Seeking insight across projects and basins
10. In other words…
Projects contribute to achieving the BDC - hence
should adhere to core principles
Basin focus but mechanisms in place to ensure cross
basin learning - TWGs
Our whole Program Team in place to make
integrated process work
Ability to scale up, replicate, influence and
contribute to policy change
10
12. Engaging decision-makers and
marketing Phase 1 outcomes
CPWF Learning Events at
World Bank and IFPRI
Basin stakeholder visits
in the Andes and the Nile
Stockholm
World Water Week
13. Marketing outcomes from Phase 1
The major effort to utilize Phase 1 outcomes is
through Phase 2
Continuous flow of Phase 1 legacy outputs
BFP special issues, book and high-level science paper
Science synthesis and evidence-based papers
Strategic engagement with the media (films, print)
Sourcebook for development professionals
Joint IFAD-CPWF initiative on
Research into Use (5 Phase 1 projects)
Mainstreaming innovation (19 Phase 1 projects)
14. Operationalizing Phase 2 - BDCs
EoIs approved
Proposal development
workhop Jan 2011
Operational
Operational
Operational 90% operational
2
1
16. Basins to engage with
decision-makers and donors
World Bank and other major global players to be invited
to basin key events
Link with program-level
Fund raising at basin level
Basin- or activity-specific
Not for a 2nd BDC
Any fund raised by CPWF is supposed to benefit CRP5
Needs to be reflected upon from 2012 with the perspective of
a basin exit strategy
18. MT responsibilities and
communications rules
MT basin lead persons
Boru: Ganges, Limpopo and Nile
Larry: Andes, Mekong
Sophie (AD): Volta – plus TWG
Full responsibilities of budget envelopes
Boru – Innovation and Impact (incl. KM & publications)
Larry – Science
Sophie (AD) - Topic Working Groups
Program internal communications
MT skype e-meeting every other Thursday
E-mail: 1 idea – 1 title – 1 screen
20. « Full integration v1 » into
CRP5 on Land, Water and Ecosystems
R4D portfolio, program/basin teams maintained until early 2014
Contribution to CRP5 design, objectives and « best bets »
Irrigation
Resource Recovery
River Basins
Ecosystems
Rainfed
Pastoral
Information Systems
21. A science integration learning from
CPWF
A new Advisory Committee taking over CSC
functions, guiding our science and being the core of
the future CRP5’s AC
CPWF role to better articulated in CRP5
Start from present writing and build the justification
for effective integration as a way of strengthening
CRP5 - in practice test our BDC approach on 1-2
regional hubs
22. A governance integration
serving the program’s continuity
CPWF, its teams and its brand will continue to exist
until 2014
CPWF’s interests protected by AC
Once CRP5 is approved and launched
IWMI and CPWF board amalgamated
JVA dissolved
CPWF Director member of CRP5 Steering Committee,
Management Committee and IWMI MT
23. An important reminder
As a partnership program aiming at alleviating
poverty, we should constantly look for
Increasing our efficiency – be firm on decisions
and avoid ineffective debates on processes and
detail issues
Building alliances rather than walls
23
Editor's Notes
Optional slide (hidden), to be used as a resource.The sunrise triangle shows how far we stand and the progressivity of TWGs’ establishment
Points to make (from Boru):Why our core principles? Learned from experience that:Partnership -- Research won’t be relevant nor research outputs put into use without partnership; networkingCapacity development -- Making change happen often requires changes in peoples’ knowledge, attitudes and skills, through capacity developmentAdaptive management -- Real world problems are complex and dynamic, goal post shift, opportunities emerge. Projects, BDCs and the Program must be able to learn, spot opportunity and take advantage of it to really make a differenceGender and diversity -- We work to benefit women, youth, socially excludedInterdisciplinary integration -- Real world problems are complex and multifaceted and unlikely to fall to single disciplinary researchAccountability – we ensure our accountability to our stakeholders while also working to improve accountability systems impacting on water productivity and livelihoods[Suggest don’t go through all, pick your top two]Linking research to impact:We carefully chose compelling basin development challenges to motivate people to get on the busWe then invest early-on in mapping out pathways to the desired outcomes and impact. These pathways, or road maps (for the bus) link the research we do, how we do it (guided by core principles) to changes in next user and end user knowledge, attitude, skills and practice. Agreeing these outcome pathways, and who needs to do what, when, helps ensure programmatic coherence and helps set priorities. The road map can change, indeed we expect it to change, once the journey begins (adaptive management). We manage our program to allow that to happen (part of what makes us different).We systematically seek insight across our projects and basins by:Being guided by conceptual frameworks the CPWF sees useful to guide practice and to which it seeks to help develop (e.g., Resilience, MUS, Innovation Systems)Setting up and supporting Topic Working Groups as a mechanism for doing 1)Setting up our 28 projects as experiments into how research does (and does not) foster innovation and developmental changeOther key elements to add (left in from Amanda) here by speaking to the slide (if not mentioned before)Projects contribute to achieving the BDC (hence should adhere to core principles)Basin focus but mechanisms in place to ensure cross basin learning (covered by the previous slide if needed)Team in place to make integrated process workAbility to scale up, replicate, influence and contribute to policy change
MV: Do we have running points for the MT meetings?Yes, agenda items are the following:BDCs DEVELOPMENT, COMMISSIONING AND CONTRACTINGTOPIC WORKING GROUPSBUDGETSCOMMUNICATIONSCRP5 STRATEGY AND WORKSHOPMT CALENDAR