Detailed description of the operating microscope in endodontics, its use and availability in the market. Appropriate review of literature added with case reports.
3. Resolution: The
ability of an optical
system to make clear
and distinguishable 2
separate entities.
Limits of the Human Vision
4. A common OM can raise the resolving limit from
0.2 mm to 0.006 mm (6 μm).
At the highest power a restoration margin
opening of only 0.006mm is essentially sealed.
5. WHY ENHANCED VISION IS
NECESSARY IN DENTISTRY?
Few procedures that
demand tolerances well
beyond the 0.2-mm limit.
Crown margins
Scaling procedures
Incisions
Root canal location
Caries removal
Furcation & perforation
repair
Postplacement or
removal
Bone- and soft-tissue
grafting
7. Howard Selden: first endodontist to publish an article on
the use of the OM in endodontics.
In 1999, Gary Carr: introduced an OM that had Galilean
optics and that was ergonomically configured for
dentistry.
1. had a magnification changer that allowed for 5 discrete
magnifications (magnification 3.5–30)
2. had a stable mounting on either the wall or ceiling
3. had angled binoculars allowing for sit-down dentistry
4. and was configured with adapters for an assistant’s
scope and video or 35-mm cameras
5. It used a confocal illumination module
How did it all start?
following advantages
8. The skillful use of an
OM entails its use for
the entire procedure
from start to finish.
Working in such a way
depends on refinement
of ergonomic and visual
skills to a high level.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13. Working of Microscope
Galilean optics.
Parallel optics
enables the
observer to focus at
infinity, relieving
eyestrain.
Understanding and caring for an operating microscope
C o m m u n i t y E y e H e a l t h J o u r n a l 2 0 1 4 .
15. MAGNIFICATION
Eye pieces which are
available in powers of 6.3X,
10X, 12.5X, 16X, 20X.
It consists of:
1) A viewing side with rubber
cup
2) Adjustable diopter setting
(-5 to +5).
3) Binoculars which is used
to hold eye piece which may
be straight, inclined or
inclinable and again of
shorter or longer focal
length.
16. 1. Straight: The tubes are
parallel to the head of the
microscope.
2. Inclined: Inclined tubes are
fixed at a 45° angle to the line
of sight of the microscope.
3. Inclinable Tubes: The
inclinable tubes are
adjustable through a range of
angles.
17. The total magnification (TM) of a microscope depends on the
combination of the four variables:
1. Focal Length Of Binocular (FLB)
2. Focal Length Of Objective Lens (FLOL)
3. Eyepiece Power (EP)
4. Magnification Factor Of The Changer (MF)
The total magnification can be represented by the following
formula:
TM = (FLB/FLOL) x EP x MF
Total Magnification of Microscope
18. Magnification changer
• A 3-, 5-, 6- step manual
changer or power zoom-
changer.
• Located within the head of
the microscope.
• Permits smooth transition
between magnifications.
Objective lenses whose focal
length (which ranges from 100
mm to 400 mm) determines the
operating distance between
lens and surgical field.
20. Optimum Configurations For Endodontic Microsurgery
12.5x
200 or 250 mm objective lens
180° inclinable binoculars
Five step manual magnification changer
Creates a working range of 8 inches from patient
21. Magnification State of Surgery
Low
2.5 X to 8 X
Orientation of operating field,
Alignment of surgical tips
Mid Range:
10 X to 16 X
Surgical Procedures: Root-end resections
and root- end preparations
High
16 X to 30 X
To observe and evaluate fine details –
Micro fractures, isthmus etc.
Rahul Kumar et al.: Surgical Operating Microscopes in Endodontics: Enlarged Vision and Possibility
22. ILLUMINATION
Light sources: Xenon bulb/ quartz
halogen bulb
Intensity is controlled by a
rheostat & cooled by a fan.
Path of light: separation of the
light beam: stereoscopic effect
Coaxial illumination-NO shadows
23. Xenon bulb Quartz halogen
Colour temp- 56000 K 32000 K
Brighter ,True colour picture Yellow picture
24. Beam Splitter
Supplies light to direct the
image to a camera or an
auxillary observation tube.
To supply light to accessories
Essential for documentation.
25. Pistol or bicycle grips
Liquid crystal display (LCD) and high resolution
monitors which receives video signals from cameras.
Integrated video camera
Eye piece with rectile field: used for aligning during
video taping and 35 mm photography.
Auxiliary monocular or articulating binocular for
dental assistant.
ACCESSORIES
26.
27.
28. Documentation
Documentation is useful for
1. Patient and Student Education
2. Medicolegal Documentation
3. Reports to Referring Dentist
4. Insurance Companies
Photo adapters attach 35mm camera & video
camera to beam splitter.
Dental assistant can act as director while
recording.
29. THE LAWS OF ERGONOMICS
Class I motion: moving only the fingers
Class II motion: moving only the fingers and wrists
Class III motion: movement originating from the elbow
Class IV motion: movement originating from the shoulder
Class V motion: movement that involves twisting or bending at
the waist.
Carr GB. Microscopes in endodontics. J Calif Dent Assoc 1992;20(11):55–61.
30.
31. The preparation of the OM involves the
following maneuvers:
1. Operator positioning
2. Rough positioning of the patient
3. Positioning of the OM and focusing
4. Adjustment of the interpupillary
distance
5. Fine positioning of the patient
6. Parfocal adjustment
7. Fine focus adjustment
8. Assistant scope adjustment
Carr GB. Microscopes in endodontics. J Calif Dent Assoc 1992;20(11):55–61.
32. OPERATOR POSITIONING
The correct operator position :
directly behind the patient, at
the 11- or 12-o’clock position.
The operator should adjust the
seating position so that the hips
are 90° to the floor, the knees
are 90° to the hips, and the
forearms are 90° to the upper
arms.
The eyepiece is inclined so that
the head and neck are held at an
angle that can be comfortably
sustained.
Carr GB. Microscopes in endodontics. J Calif Dent Assoc 1992;20(11):55–61.
33. The eyepiece is inclined so that the head and neck are
held at an angle that can be comfortably sustained.
This position is maintained regardless of the arch or
quadrant being worked on. The patient is moved to
accommodate this position.
After the patient has been
positioned correctly, the
armrests of the doctor’s and
assistant’s chairs are adjusted
so that the hands can be
comfortably placed at the level
of the patient’s mouth.
TAKE BACK YOUR BACK!!
Carr GB. Microscopes in endodontics. J Calif Dent Assoc 1992;20(11):55–61.
34. PARFOCALISATION
A. Position the microscope above a flat, stationary surface.
B. Using a pen or pencil, make a dot on a piece of white paper to
serve as a focus target and place it within the illumination field of
the microscope.
C. Set both of the eyepiece diopter settings to “0”.
D. Set the microscope on its highest magnification setting and
focus using the fine-focus control until a sharp image is obtained.
E. Be careful not to physically shift the microscope position,
change the magnification setting to its lowest position. Focus left
and right eyepieces, one at a time, by turning the diopter ring until
the image is clear and sharp.
35.
36. OPERATORY DESIGN PRINCIPLES
The OM ~ standard dental operatories ~ designed in
the conventional way, with outdated ergonomic~-
operatory side cabinets, dual sinks, over-the-patient
delivery systems ~ extremely inefficient because of
the ergonomic constraints.
Clinicians – struggle - use the
OM for all procedures but do
not have appropriate
ergonomic designs to their
operatories - significant
frustrations
Carr GB. Microscopes in endodontics. J Calif Dent Assoc 1992;20(11):55–61.
37. The organizing design principle using the OM in the
dental operatory should revolve around an
ergonomic principle called “Circle Of Influence”.
The principle states that all
instruments and equipment
needed for a procedure are
within reach of either the
clinician or the assistant,
requiring no more than a
class IV motion, and that
most endodontic
procedures are performed
with class I or class II
motions only.
38. (A) Team work development: doctor and assistant working
erect and muscularly relaxed. (B) Adjustable cart allowing
access to all instruments, using only a class III motion.
Carr GB. Microscopes in endodontics. J Calif Dent Assoc 1992;20(11):55–61.
39.
40. THE OM AND CLINICAL PROCEDURES
In microendodontics, the
use of specialized micro-
mirrors vastly improves
efficiency and capability.
The use of smaller mirrors
results in the mirror being
placed further away from
its usual location, and even
minor hand movements
can make such use
frustrating for the novice.
41. Clinical Applications
In Conventional Endodontics
1. Cracks And Micro-fracture
2. Visualizing Root Canal System In
Finer Detail
3. Locating The Canal Orifices
4. Managing Calcified Canals
5. Intracanal Medicament
6. Obturation Of Root Canal
7. Retrieval Of Broken Instruments
8. Microscopic Management Of
Endodontic Procedural Errors
42. In Non Surgical
Treatment
• Removal of post
• Perforation errors
• Final examination of the
canal preparation
In Surgical Treatment
• Isthmus identification and
preparation
• Retro preparation
In Conservative Dentistry
• Caries detection
• Coronal preparation
• Impression quality
• Evaluating the restoration under surface
• Restoration delivery and polish
• Bonded restorations
47. • Retro Mirrors, Coaxial Ultrasonic Preparation
• Moderated Bevel Of The Root Resection
• Retrograde Root Canal Filling
48.
49. (A) Intermediary
magnification of
endodontic access
on tooth No. 15
(note there is no
sign of canals). (B)
Dentin smear
resulted from
ultrasonic
instrumentation of
pulp floor. (C)
Groove produced
after ultrasonic
usage. (D)
Mesiobuccal (MB)
and second MB
(MB2) canals
located after
ultrasonic usage.
(E) Files inserted
on MB and MB2
canals.
50.
51.
52. The purpose of this study was
to evaluate the influence of
using the dental operating
microscope (DOM) for
detection of the mesio-lingual
(ML) canal orifice in extracted
maxillary molars compared
with unaided vision (no
loupes or head- lamps).
55. Aim of our study. To assess the impact of the operating
microscope on the success rate of primary endodontic
treatments performed by postgraduate students, during their
training program in Endodontics.
56. Material and methods: A series of 184 consecutively
cases of necrotic teeth with chronic periapical
lesions that met the inclusion criteria, in which the
therapy was performed by postgraduate students
or specialists in Endodontics. All patients were
treated under the same conditions, regarding
materials, techniques and instrumentation.
The outcome of the endodontic treatment was
assessed based on the recommendations made by
the European Society of Endodontics.
57. The clinical and radiographic evaluation after 6 months
was done on a total number of 96 teeth in the control
group and 78 teeth in the study group, due to
complications as vertical root fractures, or the fact that
some patients did not respond to control appointments.
The analysis made between the results of the two
groups has shown a statistical significant difference of
the outcomes in the 6 months control period with
p=0.0151.
58. After 18 months the evaluation was made on 87 and 73
respectively, due to endo-periodontal lesions, coronal
sub-gingival fractures or refusal to come to scheduled
control visit (Table 3). At this control period the
statistical analysis is more significant with p=0.0078.
59. Labomed Prima Mu Microscope
Rs. 2,61,400
Microscopes in the Market
60. Carl Zeiss Microscopes
3 available OP MIs:
1. OPMI PROergo
2. EXTARO 300
3. OPMI pico
Approx. 10,00,000
61. Dental Microscope led
light 3 Step
Magnification With HD
Camera Attachment
US $2400 / ₹1,67,892
3 Step Magnifications
(5x, 10x & 20x)
45 degree Inclined
Binocular Tubes
12.5x Wide Field Eye
Pieces
F=200mm Objective
Lens
62. 1. Keep the microscope in a dry, cool and well-
ventilated place to prevent fungus growth on the
optics (lenses).
2. Every week, clean the optics.
3. To protect it from dust when not in use, drape a
cover over the microscope.
4. Wipe down the external surfaces with a damp
cloth soaked in hot, soapy water.
Caring For The Operating Microscope
63. 5. Cover the foot pedal with a clear plastic bag to prevent
surgical and cleaning fluids from entering and damaging
the electronics.
6. Before using, test the controls of the foot pedal (the x,y
movement, zoom, focus, light on and off).
7. Avoid kinking or bending the fibre optic cables.
8. When replacing the bulbs, avoid touching them with your
fingers. The oil left as fingerprints on the bulb can shorten
its life.
9. Do not move the microscope while the bulb is still hot
because strong vibrations may damage the filament.
10. Every six months, clean and oil the wheels and the brakes.
Remove any surplus oil when done.
64. Disadvantages
1. Need for specific training: as a DOM has a
restricted working field, 11mm -55mm.
2. An operator using a DOM can see only the tip of
the instruments, and they are used in delicate
movements of small amplitude.
3. Relatively high initial cost of the equipment and
instruments
4. The need for retraining of the auxiliary staffs.
5. Adjustment period for the new treatment
paradigms and operator postures.
65. 5. May increase treatment costs and reduce initial
productivity, besides the need for rescheduling.
6. Its size which is difficult to fit in a small
operatories.
7. It takes the operator some time to get used to
the equipment.
8. Adaptation to indirect vision.
9. Narrower field.
10. Movement of the patient.
66.
67. Conclusion
The dental operating microscope has become an integral
part of endodontic practice.
For both nonsurgical and surgical endodontic therapy it is
indispensable for excellency.
Besides the obvious benefits for clinical practice, evidence
has become available that demonstrates better outcomes
compared to treatment without vision enhancement or
magnifying eyewear.
Treatment rendered using the dental operating microscope
results in superior care for patients, and modern
endodontic therapy is more effective because of its use.
68. 1. Apotheker H. A microscope for use in dentistry. J Microsurg 1981;3(1):7–10.
2. Friedman S, Lustmann J, Shahardany V. Treatment results of apical surgery in premolar and molar teeth.
J Endod 1991;17(1):30–3.
3. Weller N, Niemczyk S, Kim S. The incidence and position of the canal isthmus: part 1. The mesiobuccal
root of the maxillary first molar. J Endod 1995;21(7): 380–3.
4. Carr GB. Magnification and illumination in endodontics. In: Hardin FJ, editor.
5. Clark’s clinical dentistry, vol. 4. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1998. p. 1–14.
6. Selden HS. The role of a dental operating microscope in improved nonsurgical treatment of ‘‘calcified’’
canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;68(1):93–8.
7. Carr GB. Common errors in periradicular surgery. Endod Rep 1993;8(1):12–8.
8. Carr GB. Microscopes in endodontics. J Calif Dent Assoc 1992;20(11):55–61.
9. Selden HS. The dental-operating microscope and its slow acceptance. J Endod 2002;28(3):206–7.
10. Michaelides PL. Use of the operating microscope in dentistry. J Calif Dent Assoc 1996;24(6):45–50.
11. Sheets CG, Paquette JM. The magic of magnification. Dent Today 1998;17(12): 60–3, 65–7.
12. Worschech CC, Murgel CAF. Micro-odontologia: visa ̃o e precisa ̃o em tempo real.
13. Londrina: Dental Press International; 2008. p. 31–81.
14. Carr GB. Endodontics at the crossroads. J Calif Dent Assoc 1996;24(12):20–6.
15. Carr GB. Ultrasonic root end preparation. Dent Clin North Am 1997;41(3):541–54.
16. Castellucci A. Magnification in endodontics: the use of the operating microscope.
17. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2003;15(5):377–84.
18. Murgel CAF, Gondim E Jr, Souza Filho FJ. Microscopio Cirurgico: a busca da exceleˆncia na Clınica
Odontologica [Surgical Microscope: the search for excel- lence on clinical dentistry]. Rev da Assoc Paul
Cir Dent 1997;51:31–5 [in Portuguese].
REFERENCES
Editor's Notes
Specifically, a dentist must have an accurate understanding of the relationship between the gross dimensions involved in restorative procedures and the dimensions of deleterious elements that cause restoration failure, such as bacteria, open margins, and imperfection in restorative materials. A filling or a crown may appear well placed, but if bacteria can leak through the junction between the tooth and the restorative material, then treatment is compromised.
A dollar bill without magnification. Note that the lines that make George Washington’s face cannot be seen in detail.
The square boxes behind Washington’s head are 0.1 mm apart and not discernible as separate boxes by most people
boxes are beyond the resolving power of the unaided human eye. For the sake of comparison, it would take about 100 bacteria to span that square. Clinically, most dental practitioners will not be able to see an open margin smaller than 0.2 mm. The film thickness of most crown and bridge cements is 25 microns. (0.025 mm), well beyond the resolving power of the naked eye.
which is beyond the common cement thickness film used in restorative dentistry.
Restorative dentists, periodontists, and endodontists routinely perform procedures requiring resolution well beyond the 0.2- mm limit
Alternatively, a common DOM can raise the resolving limit from 0.2 -0.006 mm ,thus with magnification the resolution of the human eye improves dramatically .In addition to having up to six levels of magnification ranging from 2x to 26x available, illumination is a critical component in increasing visualization.
Because all clinicians must construct 3-dimensional structures in a patient’s mouth, stereopsis, or 3-dimensional perception, is critical to achieving precision dentistry. Dentists appreciate that the human mouth is a small space to operate in, especially considering the size of the available instruments (eg, burs, handpieces) and the comparatively large size of the operator’s hands. Attempts have been made to use the magnifying endoscopes used in artroscopic procedures, but these devices require viewing on a 2-dimensional (2D) monitor, and the limitations of working in 2D space are too restrictive to be useful.
Several elements are important for consideration in improving clinical visualization. Included are factors such as
Dentists can increase their resolving ability without using any supplemental device by simply moving closer to the object of observation. This movement is accomplished in dentistry by raising the patient up in the dental chair to be closer to the operator or by the operator bending down to be closer to the patient.2 This method is limited, however, by the eye’s ability to refocus at the diminished distance.
Most people cannot refocus at distances closer than 10 to 12 cm. Furthermore, as the eye-subject distance (ie, focal length) decreases, the eyes must converge, creating eyestrain. As one ages, the ability to focus at closer distances is compromised. This phenomenon is called presbyopia and is caused by the lens of the eye losing flexibility with age. The eye (lens) becomes unable to accommodate and produce clear images of near objects. The nearest point that the eye can accurately focus on exceeds ideal working distance.
In 1999, Gary Carr: introduced an OM that had Galilean optics and that was ergonomically configured for dentistry, with several advantages that allowed for easy use of the scope for nearly all endodontic and restorative procedures.
It used a confocal illumination module so that the light path was in the same optical path as the visual path, and this arrangement gave far superior illumination than the angled light path of the earlier scope.
Although the OM is now recognized as a powerful adjunct in endodontics, it has not been adopted universally by all endodontists. It is seen by many endodontists as simply another tool and not as a way of practice that defines how an endodontist works.
Although cost is frequently cited as the major impediment, in truth, it is not cost but a failure to understand and implement the positional and ergonomic skills necessary to effectively use an OM.
This failure has restricted its universal use in all endodontic cases.
The occasional or intermittent use of an OM on a patient results in the inefficient use of a clinician’s time. It represents a disruption in the flow of treatment of the patient, which can only negatively affect the final result. Clinicians who practice this way seldom realize the full advantage of a microscopic approach and never develop the visual and ergonomic skills necessary to operate at the highest level.
The skillful use of an OM entails its use for the entire procedure from start to finish. Working in such a way depends on refinement of ergonomic and visual skills to a high level.
The efficient use of the OM requires advanced training.
Many endodontic procedures are performed at magnification 10 to 15, and some require a magnification as high as 30.
Operating comfortably at these magnifications requires accommodation to new skills that were not taught until recently in dental schools.
Among other things, working at these higher-power magnifications brings the clinician into the realm where even slight hand movements are disruptive, and physiologic hand tremor is a problem.
The dental microscopes uses the parallel beam path better known as “the Telescope system” which follows galilean optics wherein focus is at infinity and parallel beams of light are send to each eye thereby reducing strain on clinicians eye. Also, illumination with operating microscope is co-axial with line of sight.
Fro m the light source light is reflected through condensing lens to an array of prisms to the objective lens. From the objective lens the light is focused to the surgical field. From the surgical site the light is reflected back to the objective lens and then passes through the magnification changers. Fro m magnification changers the light reaches the binoculars wherein the beam is split and the surgical field is seen through the eye piece. The telesocpic loupes follow the convergent beampath that is the Greenough system.
The dental microscopes uses the parallel beam path better known as “the Telescope system” which follows galilean optics wherein focus is at infinity and parallel beams of light are send to each eye thereby reducing strain on clinicians eye. Also, illumination with operating microscope is co-axial with line of sight.
Fro m the light source light is reflected through condensing lens to an array of prisms to the objective lens. From the objective lens the light is focused to the surgical field. From the surgical site the light is reflected back to the objective lens and then passes through the magnification changers. Fro m magnification changers the light reaches the binoculars wherein the beam is split and the surgical field is seen through the eye piece. The telesocpic loupes follow the convergent beampath that is the Greenough system.
Straight: The tubes are parallel to the head of the microscope. They are generally used in otology and are not well suited for dentistry.
Inclined: Inclined tubes are fixed at a 45° angle to the line of sight of the microscope.
Inclinable tubes: The inclinable tubes are adjustable through a range of angles and allow the clinician to always establish a very comfortable working position. It is therefore obvious that, even if more expensive, the inclinable binocular is always to be preferred.
For example: Binocular focal length = 125.mm Objective lens focal length = 250 mm Eyepiece magnification = 10x Magnification factor = 0.5TOTAL MAGNIFICATION = 125/250 x 10 x 0.5 = 2.5x
The objective lens is the final optical element, and itsfocal length determines the working distance between the microscope and the surgical field. The range of focal length varies from 100 mm to 400 mm. A 200 mm focal length allows approximately 20 cm (8 inches) of working distance, which is generally adequate for utilization in endodontics. There is adequate room to place surgical instruments and still be close to the patient. In periodontics a 250 mm is suggested to give more room to the clinician who may work both on the buccal and palatal side of the same quadrant and who might need to rotate the head of the patient. The objective lens, as well as all the other lenses of the microscope (eyepiece lenses, magnification turret lenses, camera attachment lenses, etc), all have several layers of an anti-reflective coating on both surfaces, which reduces return light loss from normally 2% per lens surface to only 0.5% per lens surface. In other words, the coating is used to absorb only a minimum amount of light in order not to decrease the illumination of the operative field.
2.5 X to 8 X for orientation of operating field.2. 10 X to 16 X - midrange magnification, are best for
performing root-end resections and root- end preparations. 3. 18 X to 30 X to observe and evaluate fine details –
micro fractures, isthmus etc.
100 watt Xenon halogen bulb
Intensity is controlled by a rheostat
cooled by a fan.
The light of the scope should be perpendicular to
The floor, perpendicular to the long axis of the examined tooth and directed to the mirror
Illumination is mainly co-axial with line of sight, which means that light is focussed between the eye pieces so that no shadows will be visible. This is possible due to the usage of Galilean optics.
Eyepiece lens
Prism
Magnification Changer
Objective Lens
important parts of a procedure, which, for instance, may illustrate why a previous treatment failed can be shown in a court of law or an insurance company.
An understanding of efficient workflow using an OM entails knowledge of the basics of ergonomic motion. Ergonomic motion is divided into 5 classes of motion:
No clinical example of the Class V motion movement is shown because this move- ment is the most prejudicial of all (unfortunately, this is the most common movement used by dentists and dental assistants with or without the OM).
The operator should adjust the seating position so that the hips are 90 to the floor, the knees are 90 to the hips, and the forearms are 90 to the upper arms.9 The oper- ator’s forearms should lie comfortably on the armrest of the operator’s chair, and feet should be placed flat on the floor. The back should be in a neutral position, erect and perpendicular to the floor, with the natural lordosis of the back being supported by the lumbar support of the chair. The eyepiece is inclined so that the head and neck are held at an angle that can be comfortably sustained.
Declination Angle
Objective lens distance
Forward head position
Arm position
After the patient has been positioned correctly, the armrests of the doctor’s and assistant’s chairs are adjusted so that the hands can be comfort- ably placed at the level of the patient’s mouth.
The trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, and erector spinae muscles of the neck and back are completely at rest in this position.
Red: Declination Angle
Blue: Working Distance
White: Forward head angle
Green: Arm postion
Once the ideal position is established, the operator places the OM on one of the lower magnifications to locate the working area in its proper angle of orientation. The image is focused and stepped up to higher magnifications if desired.
The OM was originally introduced into standard dental operatories that have been designed in the conventional way, with outdated ergonomic concepts using the tradi- tional operatory side cabinets, dual sinks, over-the-patient delivery systems, and so forth. This historical design turned out to be extremely inefficient because of the ergo- nomic constraints imposed by the way the OM is actually used in endodontic proce- dures. There is an ergonomic flow to using an OM efficiently, and careful operatory design is critical in enabling this flow. One of the main reasons clinicians struggle with using the OM for all procedures is that the ergonomic design of the operatory prohibits it. Clinicians who attempt to use the OM for all procedures but do not have appropriate ergonomic designs to their operatories experience significant frus- trations
The principle posits that all instruments and equipment needed for a procedure are within reach of either the clinician or the assistant, requiring no more than a class IV motion, and that most endodontic procedures are performed with class I or class II motions only (Fig. 15). The principle assumes that the most ergonomic way to work is to perform all proce- dures under the OM, including the diagnostic examination, oral cancer screening, anesthesia, and rubber dam placement.
Elbow support for doctor and assistant is mandatory to allow the necessary fine motor skills under constant magnification and muscular comfort throughout the day.
When one tries to use conventional concepts with magnification, frustra- tion and inefficiency are the usual results (Fig. 21). Specifically, in microendodontics, the use of specialized micromirrors vastly improves efficiency and capability
Nothing is seen besides the high-speed head and parts of the tooth. Such image when using the OM, causes frustration and introduces inefficiency and significant clinical impairment.
The efficient use of an OM for all clinical procedures requires not only ergonomic sophistication but also special clinical skills that are not required in nonmicroscopic endodontics. When one tries to use conventional concepts with magnification, frustra- tion and inefficiency are the usual results (Fig. 21). Specifically, in microendodontics, the use of specialized micromirrors vastly improves efficiency and capability (Fig. 22). The skills needed to manipulate much smaller mirrors at higher magnification are easily acquired by dentists, but not without some effort. The use of smaller mirrors results in the mirror being placed further away from its usual location, and even minor hand movements can make such use frustrating for the novice (Fig. 23). Proper ergo- nomic form and a well-trained assistant can mitigate some of this frustration, but it takes practice and repetition to master the skills required
Vertical root fracture
re treatment like post removal; the higher magnificat ion and illu mination helps in d iffe rentiating between tooth structure and various restorative cements. By this, there is more conservative post removal which gives better prognosis.
Using ultrasonic tip, instrument has been dislodged and is now at the orifice of the canal.
Post op view after 2 canals have been obturated with retro filling material
Conservative and Co-axial root end preparation
High magnification inspection of caries below crown margin.
With the use of only a sharp endodontic explorer and mouth mirror (unaided vision, no adjunctive use of illumination or magnification), 20 ML canal orifices were detected out of the 39 teeth, representing 51%. After evaluation of the same 39 teeth with the DOM, an additional 12 ML canal orifices were detected in the remaining 19 teeth (63%). In other words, these 12 canal orifices were not located without the use of the DOM. Overall, 82% of ML canals were detected in 39 experimental teeth by using both methods of discovery. In the lab, after sectioning and staining all the teeth, 3 additional ML canals were identified in the remaining 7 teeth. These 3 canals were not detected with unaided visual examination or with the DOM. A total of 35 ML canals were identified out of 39 experimental teeth.
According to the results of our study the success rates of endodontic treatment performed with the use of a DOM improved the results of conservative endodontic therapy of necrotic teeth with chronic apical periodontitis.
The DOM allowed a better detection and removal of residual root canal materials and ensued a proper cleaning and shaping of the whole endodontic system.
1 Cordero I. How to care for and clean optical surfaces. Comm Eye Health J 2010;72(23):57
2 Cordero I. Fungus: how to prevent growth and remove it from optical instruments. Comm Eye Health J;83(26):57
SOM use would lead to greater clinical success. Greater visualization is only a positive benefit and has no drawbacks; the rewards of its use are all positive, and there are no risks. How many other instruments or materials in dentistry, or life for that matter, can one say that about?
Why is its prevalence so small among the general dental population?
The answer is apathy, indifference, inertia, a lack of exposure to its benefits, fear of cost, fear of the change that would accompany its introduction, and many similar reasons. In addition, there is a common rationalization that use of the scope will slow down the clinician, and as such will be a drag on production, and that present methods of visualization are sufficient, and more enhanced methods are not needed. If clinicians asked themselves honestly, would they like to be treated with the naked eye, loupes, or the SOM, what would the answer be? Would they want their wives and husbands treated without it if they had a choice? I strongly suspect they would prefer the SOM.
―You can only treat what you can see! ― Prof. Syngcuk Kim.