Topic 1: Product Design
List and describe briefly the elements of Product Design. Select one and apply it to a product you would like to see created in the marketplace.
Topic 2: Service Design
List and describe briefly the elements of Service Design. Consider a service industry and create a short service blueprint, a series of events that has at least 5 steps. Then describe each step with a short paragraph under each step.
Topic 3: VCA, RBV, and SWOT Analyses
Discuss how you can use VCA, RBV, and SWOT analyses to gain a stronger sense of what might be a firm’s key building blocks are for a successful strategy.
Choose a Fortune 1000 company to demonstrate these aforementioned analyses.
Please remember to use APA citation (text and list references) to further validate your initial responses. Take time to review the responses of your classmates and provide your feedback.
Topic 4:
The concept of best practices is simple: Do not recreate the wheel.
For this week's Discussion, please research and find an article relating to best practices that you find truly interesting. Find a company or situation that created a best practice that others follow, or find a best practice that was implemented and proved effective, efficient, and innovative.
Answer the following questions relating to the article and your own experience with best practices:
Please describe the background for the article you researched and explain why this particular best practice scenario appealed to you. What did you learn from the situation that you could apply to your own life?
Best practices are for not only our professional lives, but our personal lives as well. Please describe a situation in your life that needed some type of improvement and, after observing someone else in a similar situation handle things differently, how you decided to implement your own best practice. Is this best practice still effective, or have you improved it?
Second exam
Continue Corporation ….
(Read about this take over on page 1087 important )
The difference of public company and private company is that public company’s shares are freely transferable and everyone can buy the shares from public market .
Merger of acquisiton - ( take over ) is the long process which is based on the decision of board of directors .
Poison pill – deters hostile takeover attempts by threatening the raider and its shareholders with severe dilutions in the value of the shares they hold
In the Paramount case – the acquired company is <Time> what decision did the directors of Time make , preservation , long term shareholders value,
If directors make a decision based on their interest rather than company’s interest , they will violate business judgment rule and will be held liable for that
If the company create a long run acquisition strategy and follow it that should be good in the court , in this case the time had long run strategy to expand their business . So they can accept the lower price but ...
Topic 1 Product DesignList and describe briefly the element.docx
1. Topic 1: Product Design
List and describe briefly the elements of Product Design. Select
one and apply it to a product you would like to see created in
the marketplace.
Topic 2: Service Design
List and describe briefly the elements of Service Design.
Consider a service industry and create a short service blueprint,
a series of events that has at least 5 steps. Then describe each
step with a short paragraph under each step.
Topic 3: VCA, RBV, and SWOT Analyses
Discuss how you can use VCA, RBV, and SWOT analyses to
gain a stronger sense of what might be a firm’s key building
blocks are for a successful strategy.
Choose a Fortune 1000 company to demonstrate these
aforementioned analyses.
Please remember to use APA citation (text and list references)
to further validate your initial responses. Take time to review
the responses of your classmates and provide your feedback.
Topic 4:
The concept of best practices is simple: Do not recreate the
wheel.
For this week's Discussion, please research and find an article
relating to best practices that you find truly interesting. Find a
company or situation that created a best practice that others
follow, or find a best practice that was implemented and proved
effective, efficient, and innovative.
2. Answer the following questions relating to the article and your
own experience with best practices:
Please describe the background for the article you researched
and explain why this particular best practice scenario appealed
to you. What did you learn from the situation that you could
apply to your own life?
Best practices are for not only our professional lives, but our
personal lives as well. Please describe a situation in your life
that needed some type of improvement and, after observing
someone else in a similar situation handle things differently,
how you decided to implement your own best practice. Is this
best practice still effective, or have you improved it?
Second exam
Continue Corporation ….
(Read about this take over on page 1087 important )
The difference of public company and private company is that
public company’s shares are freely transferable and everyone
can buy the shares from public market .
Merger of acquisiton - ( take over ) is the long process which is
based on the decision of board of directors .
Poison pill – deters hostile takeover attempts by threatening the
raider and its shareholders with severe dilutions in the value of
the shares they hold
In the Paramount case – the acquired company is <Time> what
decision did the directors of Time make , preservation , long
term shareholders value,
If directors make a decision based on their interest rather than
company’s interest , they will violate business judgment rule
and will be held liable for that
3. If the company create a long run acquisition strategy and follow
it that should be good in the court , in this case the time had
long run strategy to expand their business . So they can accept
the lower price but with long Run strategy .
Tender offer - is the offer that is above the asking price (
premume price )
(Read page 1081 business judgment rule )
If there are : absent bad fait, fraud, or breach of fiduciary duty ,
the judgment of board of directors is conclusive ; three
requirements …… reasonable investigation, rational basis , no
conflict of interest
(read page 1091 conflicting interest transaction )
Conflict of interest may arise when the directors or officers
with a conflict of interest my prefer his own interest over those
of the corporation .
Under the MBCA corporation There is no conflict of interest
when 1. The transaction has been approved by a majority of
informed, disinterested directors , 2. The transaction has been
approved by a majority of the shares held by informed,
disinterested shareholders , or 3. The transaction is fair to
corporation .
Even if first two requirements are satisfied , the court will void
the transaction if the third one is missing .
Generally, unanimous approval of an interested person
transaction by informed shareholders conclusively releases an
interested director or officers from liability , even if transaction
is unfair to the corporation.
( read page 1093 usurpation of a corporate opportunity lecture #
6 after 1hour 58min )
As a fiduciaries, directors and officers are liable to their
4. corporation for usurping
( stealing ) corporate opportunities .
( read page 1092 Sarbanes- Oxley ) after 2 hour 1 min
Congress included in the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002 a
section generally prohibiting public companies from making
loans to their directors or officers.
But if the corporation is not a public company or if the loan is
made to a nonexecutive , the SOA doesn’t prohibit the corporate
loan .
( read page 1095 oppression of minority shareholders ( freeze
out) ) after 2 hour 6 min
oppression may occur when directors of close corporation who
are also the majority shareholders pay themselves high salaries
yet refuse to pay dividends or to hire minority shareholders as
employees of the corporation.
One method of oppression is freeze out - the article of merger
says that only the shareholders of the new corporation will
survive as shareholders of the surviving new corporation ; the
shareholders of the old corporation will receive cash only .
The special term for a freeze out of shareholders of publicly
owned corporations is – Going private
( read page 1096 trading inside information )
Securities Regulation, the illegality of insider trading is already
federal law under the Security Exchange Act
( read page 1098 directors and officers liability for torts and
crimes )
The liability of the corporation. For torts, the vicarious liability
rule of respondeat superior applies to corporations . Directors
and officers are personally liable when they commit torts or
crimes during the performance of their corporate duties.
The directors or officers are usually not liable for the torts of
employees of the corporation, since corporation not a director
5. or the officer, is the principle but if they authorizes the torts but
not involved they will have criminal liability.
(read page 1102 insurance and indemnification )
to encourage persons to become directors, corporation
indemnify them for their outlays associate with defending
lawsuit brought against them and paying judgments and
settlements amount . it is the same as to purchase insurance to
protect themselves against lawsuit.
( read page 1108 share. Meetings and conduct meeting just
understand the concept)
Conduct of meetings : to conduct business at shareholders’
meetings, a quorum aof outstanding shares must be represented
at the meeting . If the approval of more than one class of shares
is required, a quorum of each class of shares must be present .
A Quorum is a majority of shares outstanding, unless a greater
percentage is established in the article
( read page 1122 and 1123 dividends)
there are two type of dividends : cash and share – look at the
book
( read page 1124 share repurchases )
A corporation may also distribute its assets by repurchasing its
shares from its shareholders , it can be either redemption or
open market repurchase
Review first exam on the march 25 lecture , multiple choice
questions ( Iphone)
Securities
Definition
The Howey test states that an investment contract is an
6. investment of money in a common enterprise with an
expectation of profits solely from the efforts of others
In order to satisfy the definition of securities it should me met
to these three attributes
If anyone violate HOWEY TEST ( security law ) the SEC will
come after them some cases it will end up appearing in the jail .
One of the violations is trading inside information : about the
rate of securities and so on
Basic and fundamental distinctions of 1933 and 1934 acts are
that 1934 has ongoing reporting requirements ( all the time
companies do ongoing reporting about their financial statements
for exp. 10K is under 34 act and so on ), under the 1933 act it is
when you issue the shares , so the inssuance of the shares
subject to 1933 act . First time you sell your share to the public
, that initial public offering is called IPO, so if you have an IPO
you fall under 1933 act
Important Materials also highlitied in the book starts page 1140
There are certain exemptions that companies will not only
offers their securities for investors , but also state residents (
single investor) in this case the company has to go all of the
steps that was described that they did for investors .
And there is a specific rule ( page 1150 ) called 506 rule , which
is not statue , it is a rule . that is saying that there are two
requirements for selling securities : in the book
Page 1150 rule 506 )
1934 act is about financial reports , so 10q is quarterly
financial statement , 10k is annual report, 8k is special events
is not gonna affect financial report that investor should know
7. about that , 14A proxy statement .
Employment law
Employee at will – being employee you can leave the company
any time unless you have specific contract with them not to
leave the company in certain period of time and vise versa
employer can fire you any time , so you can be fired and you
can quit with no reason any time .
But - if you are discriminated based on ; race , age, religion ,
gender , disability , ethnicity you are protected by law
Under older worker protection act ( ADEA) prohibits
employment discrimination against persons 40 years of age or
older.
Collective bargaining is a good system because you have a
group negosiating or one entity negosiating on behalf of entire
employee group where as each individual negosiating own her
own that wont have that collective bargaining power .
Business Ethics
Kantian Ethics?
Abiding by the rules applied to others in making decisions.
The applicability of "do unto others as you would have them do
unto you."
All cases should be treated alike.
Someone who believes that the principles of justice and moral
duties are based on universal rules, and that the actor must
abide by the same rules being applied to others, believes in
which moral theory
8. Rawls's social justice theory includes which of the following?
the belief that the moral rules should be determined by persons
who have a "veil of ignorance" about their place or station in
society
The moral theory of ethical relativism can best be characterized
by:
the belief that a person must decide what course of action is
proper based on that person's own set of beliefs or feelings
the maximizing profits theory
The theory of business social responsibility that holds that a
business owes duties solely to produce the highest return for its
shareholders is:
A business that is concerned solely with the financial
implications of alternate courses of action is applying which
theory of the social responsibility of business?
Rule of corporations
When the board of directors opposed the tender offer , and
shareholders of target company losses the opportunity to sell
their shares with tender offer , they may use the directors but
the court will not find directors liable for opposing the tender
offer because the business judgment rule applies to a board’s
decision to oppose a tender offer .
But if directors actions indicate that they opposed the tender
offer in order to preserve their jobs , they will be liable to the
corporation. If directors make a decision based on their interest
rather than company’s interest , they will violate business
judgment rule and will be held liable for that
Business judgment rule
9. If there are : absent bad fait, fraud, or breach of fiduciary duty ,
the judgment of board of directors is conclusive ; three
requirements - …… reasonable investigation, rational basis , no
conflict of interest
Conflict of interest
Conflict of interest may arise when the directors or officers
with a conflict of interest my prefer his own interest over those
of the corporation
Generally, unanimous approval of an interested person
transaction by informed shareholders conclusively releases an
interested director or officer from liability even if transaction
is unfair to the corporation.
Usurpation of a corporate opportunity
As a fiduciaries, directors and officers are liable to their
corporation for usurping
( stealing ) corporate opportunities
the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002
Congress included in the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002 a
section generally prohibiting public companies from making
loans to their directors or officers.
But if the corporation is not a public company or if the loan is
made to a nonexecutive , the SOA doesn’t prohibit the corporate
loan .
Oppression of minority shareholders ( freeze out)
oppression may occur when directors of close corporation who
are also the majority shareholders pay themselves high salaries
yet refuse to pay dividends or to hire minority shareholders as
employees of the corporation.
One method of oppression is (private going) freeze out - the
article of merger says that only the shareholders of the new
corporation will survive as shareholders of the surviving new
10. corporation ; the shareholders of the old corporation will
receive cash only .
Trading inside information
Securities Regulation, the illegality of insider trading is already
federal law under the Security Exchange Act
Directors and officers liability for torts and crimes
The liability of the corporation. For torts, the vicarious liability
rule of respondeat superior applies to corporations . Directors
and officers are personally liable when they commit torts or
crimes during the performance of their corporate duties.
The directors or officers are usually not liable for the torts of
employees of the corporation, since corporation not a director
or the officer, is the principle but if they authorizes the torts but
not involved they will have criminal liability.
Rules of Security
Definition
The Howey test states that an investment contract is an
investment of money in a common enterprise with an
expectation of profits solely from the efforts of others
In order to satisfy the definition of securities it should me met
to these three attributes
If anyone violate HOWEY TEST ( security law ) the SEC will
come after them some cases it will end up appearing in the jail .
11. One of the violations is trading inside information : about the
rate of securities and so on
Basic and fundamental distinctions of 1933 and 1934 acts are
that 1934 has ongoing reporting requirements ( all the time
companies do ongoing reporting about their financial statements
for exp. 10K is under 34 act and so on ), under the 1933 act it is
when you issue the shares , so the inssuance of the shares
subject to 1933 act . First time you sell your share to the public
, that initial public offering is called IPO, so if you have an IPO
you fall under 1933 act
1933 Act
Under the 1933 Securities Act, a person responsible may be
held liable for:
1. intentional fraud, 2. a material omission or misstatement 3.
failure to file a registration statement or deliver a prospectus as
required by law
Section 5 of the 1933 Act states the basic rules regarding the
timing, manner, and content of offers and sales . it creates
three important periods of time in the life of a securities
offering: 1. The pre –filling period , 2. The waiting period, 3.
The post effective period
Under the rule 506 , which part of securities act regulation D ,
investors must be qualified to purchase the securities. They
have to be either accredited investors or unaccredited investors
who has a knowledge and experience in financial and business
matter. And they should sign an investment latter verifying that
they are qualifying .
Accredited – institutional investors , high level insider of
issuer, . It can sell to an unlimited number of accredited
12. purchasers .
Unaccredited – should be no more than 35 purchasers who have
sufficient investment knowledge and experience
Small offering exemptions
Section 3(b) and 4(6) of the 1933 Act permit the SEC to exempt
from registration any offering by an issuer not exceeding 5
million. State securities law may require registration ,
however.
Rule 504 of registration D allows a nonpublic issuer to sell up
to 1 million of securities in a 12-months period and avoid
registration . it must be a nonpublic issuer under the Securities
Exchange Act
Rule 505 of registration D allows any issuer to sell up to 5$
million of securities in 12 months period and avoid registration.
Liability for defective Registration statements
Section 11 of the 1933 Act provides civil liabilities for damages
when a 1933 Act registration statement on its effective date
misstates or omits a material fact. If purchaser find any of these
in the registration , the only thing that she or he has to prove is
that the defendant is in one of classes of persons liable under
section 11.
Defendant can escape liability under section 11 by proving that
the purchaser knew of the misstatement or omission when she
purchased the security. Or defendant may raise due diligence
defense . Most defendants must prove that after a reasonable
investigation they had reasonable grounds to believe and did
believe that the registration statement was true and contained no
omissions of material fact .
13. 1934 Act
1934 Act requires periodic discloser by issuers with publicly
held equity securities.
Three types of issuer must file such report
1. whose total assets exceed 10 million , and has at least 500
sec. holders
2. an issuer whose securities are traded on national securities
exchange
3. An issuer who has made a registered offering of securities
under the 1933 Act
Proxy Solicitation Regulation
The 1934 Act regulates the solicitation of proxies.
Regulation 14 A requires any person soliciting proxies from
holders of securities registered under 1943 Act to furnish each
holder with proxy statement containing voting information .
1934 act rule 10b-5 violation( it is very important provision )
as know as intifraud provision
requirements
1. misstatement or omission of Material fact
2. Materiality
3. Scienter
4. Other elements
5. Trading on inside information
Recap - you have to show a material misstatements of
omission of a material fact , you have to also show that there
was a scienter ( intended to have a fraud or some kind of gross
neglagens involved ),
You have to show that there was an actual purchase or sells
during the period of time when that misstatements and
omissions happened, and eventually you have to show that you
14. relied on the misstatements of material fact that results to your
loss.
10b-5 applies not just a financial statement , 10b-5 violation
can also creates when CEO or high executive makes material
misstatements through media
Trading on inside information
When does an insider breach the fiduciary duty of
confidentiality
1. When the insider uses entrusted corporate information for his
personal benefit
2. When the insiders discloses the entrusted corporate
information to someone other than for corporate purposes and
the insider receives a personal benefit.
When does an insider not breach the fiduciary duty of
confidentiality
1. when the insider discloses the entrusted corporate
information to someone who needs the information for corporate
purposes
2. when the insider doesn’t receive personal benefit by
disclosing or using the entrusted corporate information
3. When corporation doesn’t have a proper business purpose for
keeping the information confidential
Regulation FD is different 10b-5 , 10b-5 is saying stuff that
is with knowledge materially false or omitting so it is not 10b-5
anymore , it is not inside trading . it is trying to say hey I have
got this extra information I am in a share with this big investor
15. ,( it make sense you take care of your biggest customer ), but
you can not do it , you cant selectively disclosed information to
one group of share holders at the expense of the other . and
why is that - if there is no regulation FD , The CEO can share
the information with some group of shareholders but not with
every shareholders which is against the law of security - that
says everybody should be taking care of equally . if selective
discloser took place intentionally , there is a remedy to fix it
only if issuer must make public discloser at the same time
within 24 hours .
Foreign corrupt practices act
If someone from any companies is bribing foreign government
official that person fall within FCPA liability .
The requirements : it has to be to a government official ( any
employment of government) , the consequences are huge
penalties even jail time .
Bribe is something that is not facilitate payments . or anything
that facilitating payments is not a bribe.
Ethics and Social Responsibility of Business – Couldn’t find
rules
Rule of Employment
16. Employee at will – being employee you can leave the company
any time unless you have specific contract with them not to
leave the company in certain period of time and vise versa
employer can fire you any time , so you can be fired and you
can quit with no reason any time .
But - if you are discriminated based on ; race , age, religion ,
gender , disability , ethnicity you are protected by law
Protecting the health safety and well-being of workers and their
families
Workers’ compensation
Compensation is that employee recover only for work related
injuries . To be work related
1. the injury must be arise out of the employment , 2. And
happen in course of employment .
We need to prove only this two things . it has nothing to do
with negligence .
The employee will collect for all work-related injuries, and will
not need to prove negligence on the part of the employer.
Occupational Safety and health act
The most important measure directly regulating workplace
safety is the federal Occupational Safety and health act of
1970, With its general duty clause imposes a duty on employers
to provide their employees with a workplace and jobs free form
recognized hazards that may cause harm.
Employers are subject to having their workplaces inspected
under the Act.
Even though the Act contains numerous specific safety
standards, employers must also provide a work environment that
is free from recognized hazards that could cause death or
serious injury.
Employers are required to post notices in the workplace
informing workers of their rights under the Act.
17. Family and medical leave act ( FMLA)
In general this act covers those employed for at least 12 months,
and for 1250 hours during those 12 months , by an employer
employing 50 or more employees . Employees are covered
when there is following reasons 1. Birth of child , 2. Adoption
of child , 3.need care for a spouse with a serious health
conditions, 4. Employee’s own serious health conditions
Protecting Wages , pensions, and benefits
Unemployment Compensation
States of the condition the receipt of benefit on the recipient’s
having worked for a covered employer for a specific time period
and/or having earned a certain minimum income over such a
period. People are ineligible for benefits if voluntarily quit ,
fired for bad conduct , fail to seek suitable new work .
Employee Retirement Income Security Act ( ERISA )
ERISA doesn’t require employers to establish or fund pension
plans or doesn’t set benefits levels. Instead, it tries to check
abuses and to protect employees’ expectations that promised
pension benefits will be paid. Besides this ERISA imposes
other things also
The Fair labor standards Act ( FLSA)
FLSA regulates wages and hours by entitling covered employees
to 1) A specified minimum wage whose amount changes over
time , and 2) a time and half rate for work exceeding 40 hours
18. per week
FLSA also forbids oppressive child labor by any employer
engaged in interstate commerce , and also forbids interstate
shipment of goods produced in an establishment where
oppressive child labor occurs .
Oppressive child labor includes : 1) below age of 14, 2) 14-15 ,
unless they work in occupation specifically approved by
department of labor . 3) 16-17 particularly hazardous by the
labor department .
Collective bargaining is
a good system because you have a group negotiation or one
entity negotiation on behalf of entire employee group where as
each individual negotiation own her own that wont have that
collective bargaining power
Protecting equal opportunity
The equal pay act ( EPA)
The equal pay act ( EPA) which forbids sex discrimination
regarding pay, was a 1963 amendment to the FLSA. Unlike the
FLSA , the EPA covers executive , administrative, and
professional employees.
The typical EPA case involves woman who claims that she has
received lower pay than a male employee performing the equal
work for the same employer. Equal work requirement is met : 1)
Equal effort 2) equal skills , 3) Equal responsibility , 4) similar
working conditions .
Title 7
Title 7 of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination
based on Race, color, national origin, religion, sex . Even
though the term “ sexual harassment” doesn’t appear in the text
of Title 7, courts have long held that an employer may be liable
if it allows its employees to be subjected to unwelcome sexual
19. advances, verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Two
types. 1) Quid Pro quo sexual harassment , in which a
supervisor makes some express or implied linkage between an
employee’s submission to sexually oriented behavior and a
tangible job consequences. Employer liable under the Title 7 if
harassment took place within the scope of their employment,
otherwise it is Frolic. 2) Hostile environment harassment
conduct is covered by Title 7 which prohibits the employer from
allowing an employee to be subjected to unwelcome, sex-related
behavior that can change the conditions of her employment and
create an abusive work working environment. It can also be
inappropriate comments by employees .
Age is not covered by title 7
Title 7 covers all employers employing 15 or more employees
and engaging in an industry affecting interstate commerce .
Title 7 covers organizations , not individuals . How plaintiffs in
Title 7 cases prove that their employer discriminated against
them varies depending on the theory of discrimination.
There are 4 different defenses against Title 7 : 1) Same decision
defense 2) Bona fide seniority system , 3) The various “merit”
defense , and 4) The BFOQ defense .
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)
Under older worker protection act ( ADEA) prohibits
employment discrimination against persons 40 years of age or
older. 1) engage in an industry affecting interstate commerce 2)
at least 20 persons. Its procedures and remedies are the same as
for Title 7
The Americans with Disability Act ( ADA)
ADA prohibits discrimination against people who have
disabilities . Its procedures and remedies are the same as for
Title 7 . Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, an
employer is required to provide reasonable accommodations to
enable a disabled person to perform a job
Protecting Employee privacy
20. Employee Polygraph protection Act
The Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 (EPPA)
generally prevents employers from using lie detector tests,
either for pre-employment screening or during the course of
employment, with certain exemptions. Employers generally may
not require or request any employee or job applicant to take a
lie detector test, or discharge, discipline, or discriminate against
an employee or job applicant for refusing to take a test or for
exercising other rights under the Act. In addition, employers are
required to display the EPPA poster in the workplace for their
employees.
Job security
The Doctrine at employment at will –
Breach of an Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
In wrongful dismissal cases based on an implied covenant of
good faith and fair dealing, the discharged employee typically
contends that the employer has indicated in various ways that
the employee has job security and will be treated fairly. For
example, long time employees who have consistently received
favorable evaluations might claim that their length of service
and positive performance reviews were signs that their job
would be secure as long as they performed satisfactorily.
From the case of SEC Vs. EDAWEDS
SEC filed suet and claim under 33 act and 34 act. SEC saying
you are violating both acts
1. in a form of issuance and 2. in the form of ongoing reporting
, specifically you are engaged in a fraud and we gonna nail you
antifraud previsions under 33 act section 5 ( page 1145 you
21. will have your IPO after being all of these satisfied - ) and
under 34 act 10 b5
SEC mission is to protect overage investor
and lower court found guilty bad guys
but
supreme court , based on the definition of security HOWEY
test, says….. (read the case )
Does the fixed return constitute security . Is there a risk for
investors
Just the fact that it was a fix return is not enough it should
satisfy the definition of security Howey test
My brief
Trial court said that there was an investment contract within
the meaning of the federal securities laws and held Edwards to
be liable for the damages because they had violated the
registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities act of
1933 and antifraud previsions of the 1933 and 1934 securities
act .
Edwards and ETS appealed and the Appeal court said that
since it was not corresponding to Howey test it was a
contractual entitlement to the return than securities , so they
didn’t violate the law of securities .
SEC Asked the supreme court to review - supreme court
states that an investment scheme promising a fix rate of return
can be an “ investment contract” and thus a “ security” subject
to the federal securities laws .
117. The
Age
Discrimination
in
Employment
Act
(ADEA)
Under
older
worker
protection
act
( ADEA) prohibits employment discrimination
against persons 40 years of age or older. 1) engage in an
industry affecting
interstate commerce 2) at least 20 persons. Its procedures and
remedies are the same as
for Title 7
The Americans with Disability Act ( ADA)
ADA prohibits discrimination against people who have
disabilities . Its procedures and
remedies are the same as for Title 7 . Under the Americans with
Disabilities Act, an
employer is required to provide reasonable accommodations to
enable a disabled person
to perform a job
135. S corporation is a special type of close corporation. It is nearly
treated like partnership for federal income tax. There is only
100 or fewer shareholder.
Regulation for Profit Corporation: Corporation must complying
with incorporation statues. Corporation may do business in
many states but the relationship between corporation,
shareholders and managers is regulated only by state of
incorporation.
Regulation of foreign and alien corporation
Corporation is domestic corp. in the state that has granted its
charter- it is foreign in all other states in which is doing
business- and will be alien corp. in other country.
Generally, state can impose its laws to foreign corp. if those
laws don’t violate the constitution of USA, due process clause,
and commerce clause
Due process Clause: require corps to have sufficient contact
with state before state exercise jurisdiction over the
corporation. “when corporation veil itself of the protection of
state’s law it should suffer any reasonable burden that the state
imposed as a consequence of such a benefit. in other words
foreign crop. Should be required to pay for the benefit that it
receives from the states.
Commerce clause: the power to regulate interstate commerce is
given to federal government. The state has NO power to exclude
136. of to discriminate against foreign corp. that they are solely
engage in interstate commerce. --- state may require foreign
corp. doing interstate business in the state to imply the law if
application of the law does not unduly burden interstate
commerce.
A state law regulating the activates if foreign corp. does not
unduly burden interstate commerce if: 1- the law serves a
legitimate state interest 2- the state has chosen the least
burdensome means of promoting that interest 3- the legitimate
state interest out weights the statute’s burden on interstate
commerce.
Doing business: to aid their determination of whether a state
may constitutionally impose its laws on foreign corporation,
courts traditionally use doing business concept. The court says
foreign corporations are subject to follow state laws when they
are doing business.
Fiduciary duties- Directors and officers owe fiduciary duties to
the corporation. They are the duties to act within the authority
of the position and within the objectives and powers of the
corporation, and to act with loyalty to the corporation. In order
to determine demand futility, there must be reasonable doubt
that directors are disinterested or independent, or that the
transaction was the product of sound business judgment. Absent
bad faith, fraud, or breach of fiduciary duty, the judgment of
board of directors in conclusive. When directors and officers
have complied with the business judgment rule, they are
protected from liability to the corporation for their harmful
decisions. (1081). Three requirements must be met for the
business judgment rule to protect managers from liability: 1.
The mangers must make an informed decision. 2.The managers
may have no conflict of interest. 3. The managers must have a
rational basis for believing that the decision is in the best
interests of the corporation.
Restructuring can be done by just the general partner but
137. converting would require consent from all owners. Partner to
partner relationships have a fiduciary duty of the highest degree
of loyalty; promoting mutual trust, confidence, and honesty as
well as acting in good faith and fair dealing.
Subject foreign corp. to be sue
The international shoe minimum contact test must be met.
Subjecting the corporation to suit cannot offend “traditional
notion of fair play and substantial justice”. a court must weigh
the corporation’s contacts with in the state against the
inconvenience to the corporation of requiring it to defend a suit
with in the state.
Taxation
A state may tax foreign corporation If such a taxation doesn’t
violate the due process and commerce clause.
Qualifying to do business
Orders that require acceptance outside the state is not doing
interstate business require qualification
Isolated transaction – classified as not doing business for
qualification- which is kind of business that will completed in
30 days and are unique in their business nature. (Christmas
trees)
Qualification requirements
Qualification requirement for business that are doing interstate
business for foreign corporation to apply for certificate of
authority from secretary of state.
Regulation of foreign corporation
Piercing the corporate veil: the primary consequences of the
piercing the corp. veil is that a corp. shareholders will lose their
limited liability. Two requirement must exist for piercing the
corp, veil 1- domination of corp. by shareholders 2- use that
domination for Improper purposes. An improper purpose
includes: defrauding creditors, circumventing a statute, or
evading an existing obligation.”
138. Partnership:
Duties: partners have fiduciary duty – mutual trust, confidence,
and honest order.
Duty to serve: undertake share of responsibility of running day
to day operation -Silence partners: silent partners don’t have
duty of serve but they have same liability to partnership debt as
any other partners. – they merely contribute capital
Duty of care: partners has duty of care – partners are not liable
for loss of their honest errors – but they are liable for gross
negligence, reckless conduct, international misconduct, or
knowing violation of the law.
Duty to Act within actual authority: partner has duty to not
exceed the authority granted him by partnership agreement –
partners are responsible for losses resulting from unauthorized
transaction negotiated in the name of partnership.
Duty of account: partners have duty to account for their use or
disposal of partnership finds and partnership property as well as
their receipt of any property benefit or profit without constant
of other partners. Partnership property should be used for
partnership purposes. Indemnified: when partner use personal
acc. For purposes of partnership it is partners right to get a
refund for that expense.
Other duties: Confidentiality duty a partner must maintain the
confidentiality of partnership information such as trade secret
or a customer list. It means partner should not disclose the
partnership info. Unless it is for benefit of the partnership.
Interest are not transferable easily
139. LLC: LLC has no individual liability on LLC contracts|
LLC may be member manage or manager manage; Mangers in
manager manage LLC may be elected and removed by majority
of members.
Duties:
Each member or manager has fiduciary duty of the LLC and its
members; Members has limited ability to transfer rights;
Members in LLC can transfer transferable interest to another
person however transferee is not LLC member
Member dissociate: Under RULLCA a partner has power to
dissociate by withdrawing from LLC at any time. Dissociation
are also caused by: members death, having a guardian appointed
over her affairs, being adjudged legally in competed by court,
being debtor in bankruptcy, being expelled by other member.
Payment to a dissociate member: Under Rullca dissociate
member has no right to force LLC to dissolve or liquidate- ;
Dissociate member is not entitled to receive the value of
interest until LLC dissolve.
There is one exception if LLC at will and don’t to dissolve the
LLC must buy his interest at fair value in 120 days from
dissolved member.
If LLC has term and not dissolved must continue its business
and pay dissociated member value of interest within 120 days
after LLC term.
LLC Dissolution
RULLCA has few events that that Automatically cause
dissolution of the LLC:
1- juridical dissolution (event that making unlawful for the LLC
business to continue) is requested by member or transferee of a
member’s transferable interest 2- administrative dissolution (by
secretary of state)
Distribution of dissolved LLC
First creditors – excess fund members contribution refund-
excess fund give member fund for profit
If LLC asset is not sufficient to refund creditors, creditors
couldn’t claim for their funds due to Limited liability. but if
140. members didn’t pay their contribution to LLC creditors can sue
the for that contribution amount
“Nonmanaging members of a manager-managed LLC owe no
fiduciary duty”
“An LLC member has no individual liability on LLC contracts,
unless she also signs LLC contracts in her personal capacity”
Certificate of authority-If required to do intrastate business in a
state, a foreign corporation must apply for a certificate of
authority from the secretary of state, pay and application fee,
maintain a registered office and a registered agent in the state,
file an annual report with the secretary of state, and pay annual
fee.
Long-arm status- permits their courts to exercise (realize)
jurisdiction under the decision of the International Shoe case.
??International Shoe case- in that case, Supreme Court ruled
that a foreign corporation must have “certain minimum
contracts” with the state such that asserting jurisdiction over the
corporation does not offend “traditional notions of fair play and
substantial justice.”
General Statutes § 33-920 (a) provides: A foreign corporation,
other than an insurance, surety or indemnity company, may not
transact business in this state until it obtains a certificate of
authority from the Secretary of the State.
LLP & LLLP
LLP: have General Partner & Limited partners
General Partner: contribute capital in to the business, manage it,
share in its profits, and possess
unlimited liability for its obligation
Limited partners: contribute capital, share profit, no
management power, possess limited liability,
141. LLLP both general and limited partners have limited liability.
In both LLP and LLLP allow partners to reduce their personal
federal income tax liability by deducting limited partnership
losses from their individual income tax return. General partners
get grater tax shelter advantage than do limited partners.
Losses of the business allocated to a general partner offset his
income from any other source
Losses of the business allocated to limited partners may be used
to offset only income from other passive investment and only to
extent limited partners are at risk, that is, to extent of their
capital contribution to the limited partnership.
Defective compliance with LLP statues:
If a person attempting to create LLP and do not substantially
comply with ULPA, limited partnership does not exist, therefore
limited partnership will lose its limited liability and change the
statues to unlimited liability.
And in LLLP General partner will have unlimited liability if it
was found defective.
When a person believe that she is a limited partner but discover
later that she has been designated a general partner or that the
general partners have not filed a certificate of limited
partnership” then “she may be liable as a general partner unless
she in good faith believes she is a limited partner….. page 1018.
1. Causes a proper certificate of limited partnership to be filed
with the secretary of state, or
2. Withdraws for future equity participation in the firm by filing
a certificate declaring such withdrawal with the secretary of
state.
Rights and liabilities shared by General and limited partners:
Under ULPA profits and losses are shared on the basis of the
value of each partner’s capital contribution.
Voting right: under ULPA there are only few actions that needs
all the partner approval 1- amendment of the limited partnership
agreement 2- amendment of limited partnership certificate 3-
142. sale or transfer of substantially all limited partnership assets
outside of the ordinary course of the business – under ULPA
limited partners have no voting right
Admission of the new partner: under ULPA no new partner may
be admitted unless all the partners have consented to the
admission. – the limited partnership agreement may also
provide the power or elect the new general partner in case of
retirement or death of general partner. – in general ULPA does
not grant much power to partners to expel the partner
Pwer and right to withdraw: partners have the right to withdraw
from limited partnership at any time. The Exception, however,
limited partners have perpetual duration. As a result, ULPA
gives the partners no right to withdraw. – under ULPA the
withdrawing partner has no right to receive the value of her
partnership interest means partner will not receive the value of
his investment unless the limited partnership agreement
provides for buyout his interest or limited partnership dissolve
and liquidate.
Often close corporations restrict transfer to ensure control.
“Four categories of transfer restrictions: (1) rights of first
refusal and option agreements, (2) buy-and-sell agreements, (3)
consent restraints, and (4) provisions disqualifying purchasers.”
Uses of Transfer Restrictions help a corporation and its
“shareholders to maintain the balance of shareholder power in
the corporation” by Buy-and-Sell agreements (1065).
According to the book “Dissociated partners remain liable to
partnership creditors for partnership liabilities incurred while
there were partners,” unless novation occurs.
“Novation occurs when two conditions are met:
1. The continuing partner release a dissociated partner form
liability on a partnership debt, and
2. A partnership creditor releases the dissociated partner from
liability on the same obligation” (999).
Duty to Account states that “Partnership property should be
143. used for partnership purposes, not for a partner’s personal use”
(976).
The duty -Having Interest Adverse to Partnership- According
the book “When a partner receives a secret profit, she has a
conflict of interest, and there is a risk that she may prefer her
own interests over those of the partnership” (975).
According to the book “An agent has fiduciary duty to act
loyally for the principal’s benefit in all matters connected with
the agency relationship.” According to a duty of loyalty “… an
agent must subordinate his personal concerns by (1) avoiding
conflicts of interest with the principal, and (2) not disclosing
confidential information received from the principal.” Agent
“may not act for both parties to a transaction without first
disclosing the double role to, and obtaining the consent of, both
parties” (Mallor, Barnes, Bowers, Langvardt, Page 922).
“The faithless servant doctrine provides that an agent is
obligated to be loyal to his employer and is prohibited from
acting in any manner inconsistent with his agency or trust and is
at all times bound to exercise the utmost good faith and loyalty
in the performance of his duties. To show a violation of the
faithless servant doctrine, an employer must show (1) that the
employee’s disloyal activity was related to the performance of
his duties, and (2) that the disloyalty permeated the employee’s
service in its most material and substantial part.” (Mallor,
Barnes, Bowers, Langvardt, Page 925).
One of the duties’ of loyalty is the duty of confidentiality.
According the duty of confidentiality, an agent may not use
principal’s confidential information for his/her purposes. This
duty may also exist after the agency ends.
private securities class action lawsuits
145. much of the burden of proof on
defendants?
Answer: The result of Section 11 is that often the burden of
proof is on the defendant to prove
proper conduct. Where the proof is not available, the defendant
will lose the suit.
Diff: 1
Topic: Liability Provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Skill: Ethics and Policy
74) Are the rules on short-swing profits under Section 16(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 too restrictive or not restrictive enough? Merely because
one is a statutory insider, is it
proper to limit his or her ability to make a profit on the
company's stock? Alternatively, should
the 6-month period be longer? What is the theory behind making
the profits belong to the
corporation?
Answer: One rationale for the law is the difficulty of proving
who had inside information at any
particular time. The law assumes that the insiders do have
inside information, a reasonable
assumption. One idea behind the corporation having a claim to
the profits is that the insiders
should be devoting their efforts toward the long-term health of
the company, not making profits
in the short term buying and selling the company's stock.
Diff: 2
Topic: Liability Provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Skill: Ethics and Policy
75) For an investment contract, why is one of the requirements
for the contract to be classified as
147. Answer: An investment contract in which an investor expects to
make a profit off the efforts of
others is a security. Here, all the efforts are undertaken by John,
thus this arrangement is likely a
security.
Diff: 2
Topic: Definition of a Security
Skill: Factual Application
77) Wondercures, Inc. is a drug research and manufacturing
firm. Wondercures is currently a
privately held corporation. The owners of Wondercures believe
that they could greatly increase
the company's profitability with an infusion of new capital. This
would have to come by issuing
stock to additional investors. The owners of Wondercures
believe that they would need about
$20 million in order to carry out their expansion plans. Discuss
the options available to
Wondercures, and the advantages and disadvantages of each.
Answer: A regular registration is expensive, but would be more
attractive to investors because
the stock acquired would not be subject to restrictions.
Regulation A would not be available
because it is limited to $5 million in a 12-month period. If
Wondercures does 80 percent of its
business in one state, it could qualify for the intrastate
exemption, but would be restricted to
issuing stock to investors in that state. Wondercures would not
qualify for the small offering
exemption. Wondercures could make use of a private placement.
This would incur smaller
transaction costs compared to a regular registration, but the
stock would be restricted from resale.
This would make the stock less appealing to many potential
investors. Another disadvantage to
149. There are also several wealthy,
sophisticated individuals who would like to purchase Harmon
stock. Discuss the methods
available to issue Harmon stock exempt from SEC registration.
Answer: Harmon could use the intrastate offering exemption,
but would be limited to selling to
investors in Indiana. There is no dollar limit. Harmon could also
use a private placement, which
would also have no dollar limit, but the offering could be made
only to a maximum of 35
unaccredited investors, although there is no limit on the number
of accredited investors. Under
rule 504, Harmon could issue up to $1 million in securities over
a 12-month period, with no limit
on the number of accredited or unaccredited investors.
Diff: 3
Topic: Transactions Exempt from Registration
Skill: Factual Application
80) Bluegrass Inc. is incorporated and does all of its business in
the state of Kentucky. Bluegrass
has planned to issue $5,000,000 in new stock. Bluegrass has 10
potential investors, nine of
whom live in Kentucky, and one who lives in Ohio. Only one of
these potential investors is
accredited. Can Bluegrass qualify for any of the registration
exemptions under the Securities Act
of 1933?
Answer: Bluegrass can qualify for a private placement. It is
offering too much to qualify under
Rule 504 and cannot qualify for the intrastate offering because
of the investor in Ohio.
Diff: 3
Topic: Transactions Exempt from Registration
Skill: Factual Application
151. Pearson Education, Inc.
82) Jones is an appraiser who was hired by Monolith
Corporation to appraise a number of its
properties in connection with financial statements to be issued
in connection with a registration
statement. Because Monolith Corporation has a high turnover of
investment real estate, Jones
was hired again for help in preparing the annual financial
statements for each of the next 2 years.
It turns out that Jones was negligent in performance of all the
appraisals that led to material
misstatements on the financial statements of all years
concerned. Jones did not know that the
appraisals or financial statements were misstated. Discuss
Jones' legal situation.
Answer: Jones would be liable under Section 11 of the
Securities Act of 1933. As an expert, he
is subject to the act. Jones' negligence is sufficient for liability;
intent, or scienter, need not be
proven. Due diligence would be a defense, but Jones probably
cannot prove it. Because of the
lack of scienter, Jones would not be liable under Rule 10b-5 of
the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
Diff: 3
Topic: The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 - Trading in
Securities
Skill: Factual Application
83) Mary is an assembly-line worker at a computer company.
Mary becomes aware that an
improvement is being made in the company's primary computer,
which will significantly
increase profits. Mary tells a friend to buy stock in the
company. The friend does so and tells two
152. other persons to do the same. The Company's profits increase
greatly, and all three who
purchased stock sell at a great profit. Discuss the liability of the
parties.
Answer: Mary, as an insider tipper, is liable for the profits of
all three purchasers, as is Mary's
friend. The two remote tippees are liable for their own profits if
they had inside information and
knew or should have known that the information was not public.
Diff: 2
Topic: Insider Trading
Skill: Factual Application
84) Fred is an officer at Hill Corporation. Fred, with no inside
information, sells 100 shares of
Hill stock in May at $50, and in July he buys 250 shares at $40.
Is Fred liable for short-swing
profits?
Answer: Fred is liable. Any purchase and sale can be matched,
and here a $40 purchase and $50
sale occurred within 6 months of each other (of 100 shares),
even though Fred could not have
actually sold any of the $40 shares.
Diff: 2
Topic: Short-Swing Profits
Skill: Factual Application
5
154. to invest in the corporation.
Diff: 1
Skill: Ethics and Policy
74) If a corporation's shareholders are supposed to have
ultimate control over the corporation, is
it appropriate for management to get involved in proxy contests
among shareholders? Under
what circumstances is it most appropriate for management to get
involved?
Answer: In many cases, members of management are also
shareholders, thus it would be
difficult to preclude their involvement. Management is most
appropriately involved when the
issue is value to the shareholders, rather than management
protection of its jobs.
Diff: 2
Skill: Ethics and Policy
75) Many persons believe that it is too easy for corporations to
take over other corporations, and
point to the large reductions in workforces which frequently
result following mergers. Should
there be limits placed on the ability to lay off employees
following a business combination?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of limited regulation
of merger activity?
Answer: Many argue that mergers act as incentives for the
management of a company to not
become bloated, and that regulation will interfere with free
market efficiency.
Diff: 1
Skill: Ethics and Policy
156. basis from all who tendered.
Diff: 2
Topic: Mergers and Acquisitions
Skill: Factual Application
78) Ramone is president of Rock Permanence, Inc. Flash in the
Pan Corporation has just made a
tender offer to the shareholders of Rock Permanence. Flash in
the Pan is known for severe job
cuts after takeovers, so Ramone and the other officers do the
following:
1. They adopt contracts with provisions that the contracts will
expire Flash in the Pan should
acquire Rock Permanence.
2. They tell many shareholders that they will be hired if they do
not accept the offer. Each of
these shareholders is told to keep the arrangement secret and
that they are one of only a select
few who will be hired.
3. They distribute an article from a newspaper 2 years earlier
that discussed the inept
management of Flash in the Pan. They do not tell the
shareholders that the publisher of the article
had been successfully sued by Flash in the Pan because of false
statements.
4. They send mailings to their shareholders calling the
management of Flash in the Pan a
"committee of the devil" and "shareholders' nightmare."
Discuss the appropriateness of the four listed actions by
management.
Answer: There are many ways to fight a tender offer. No. 1 is
probably acceptable so long as
management reasonably believes these actions to be in the best
interest of the corporation and its
shareholders. No. 2 is not acceptable because it is fraudulent
158. cause is the cardholder's unwise
decisions, then the issuer has done no wrong. But if the issuer is
part of the cause, then the issuer
might have violated the moral minimum theory because it has
caused harm. Any such harm
would be difficult to quantify. Utilitarianism would ask if the
overall good increased from these
credit cards.
Diff: 2
Topic: Business Ethics and Social Responsibility of Business
Skill: Ethics and Policy
67) A company is planning to promote its services heavily via
telemarketing. The company has
learned that the majority of those to be called are strongly
opposed to receiving telemarketing
calls. In addition, many of the persons who will be called are
elderly who might decide to
purchase the product even though they do not really need it or
cannot afford it. Discuss the
appropriateness of proceeding with this plan under the different
theories of the social
responsibility of business.
Answer: The telemarketing plan is presumably aimed toward
maximizing profits. Whether the
plan meets the moral minimum would depend on whether the
company is the cause of any harm
due to unwanted telemarketing calls or elderly customers
purchasing unneeded products. Under
stakeholder interests, the company would need to consider the
needs of its customers, many of
whom might be better served by other marketing methods.
Under corporate citizenship, being a
good corporate citizen might include avoiding such marketing
methods.
Diff: 2
160. Skill: Ethics and Policy
69) The government has proposed demolishing 800 of 2,000
units in a low-income public
housing project that has become crime-ridden and in poor
repair. These 800 units will be
replaced with 300 units, half of which will be for low-income
families, and half for moderate-
income families, resulting in fewer low-income housing units in
total. Evaluate this proposal
under utilitarianism.
Answer: There might be more overall good if crime and other
problems are reduced, but crime,
as well as residents, might simply be displaced to other parts of
the community. Other factors in
evaluating what amounts to the overall good include the demand
for low-income housing, other
options for those displaced, and the current project vacancy
rate, which would affect the actual
numbers displaced.
Diff: 2
Topic: Business Ethics
Skill: Ethics and Policy
70) Compare and contrast the views held by Milton Friedman
regarding the ethical responsibility
of a corporate business to that of someone following the
stakeholder interest theory of social
responsibility.
Answer: Milton Friedman asserted that in a free society, "There
is one and only one social
responsibility of business to use its resources and engage in
activities designed to increase its
profits as long as it stays within the rules of the game." To
Friedman, following the "rules of the
game" meant engaging in open and free competition without
162. 62) The Employee Retirement Income Security Act does not
require any employers to provide
pension plans for their employees. Should this law be changed
so that employers are required to
provide at least some minimum pension plan to employees?
Answer: The goal of ERISA is to ensure that any benefits
promised to employees will, in fact,
be paid when the employee is retired, and that employees are
not otherwise misled about the
benefits that they will receive. The marketplace should probably
determine whether or not
particular employers offer a pension plan.
Diff: 2
Skill: Ethics and Policy
63) Should the law set the 40-hour workweek, given that many
persons might choose to work
longer hours but cannot because their employers do not want to
pay overtime wages? In other
words, many persons might be willing to work 45 or 50 hours a
week at their regular wage rate,
but cannot under the current law. This law also prevents a
covered employee from working 50
hours one week and only 30 hours the other week of a 2-week
pay period. Should employees be
able to voluntarily work beyond the limits for regular pay if
they so choose?
Answer: The problem with allowing this is that employers
could force employees to "choose" to
work in excess of the limits without receiving the overtime pay.
Diff: 2
Skill: Ethics and Policy
64) Debbie was the president and chief executive officer of RST
corporation. Debbie was also a
164. Skill: Factual Application
65) Mary owns a medium-size distribution business with about
20 employees. Mary had an
unusual management style and from time to time would throw
items at her employees. Paul was
working in the warehouse one hot summer day and accidentally
gave a will-call customer the
wrong goods. The customer came back to the office a short
while later upon discovering the
problem. Mary was in the office and asked who had filled his
order. The customer described
Paul, whereupon Mary went to the warehouse and threw a
computer printout, with stock
numbers and product descriptions, at Paul, yelling, "Use this,
you idiot. Maybe you can do your
job then!" Paul was startled, and by reflex turned to run after
Mary, but slipped when he was
barely under way. Paul's back was injured when the computer
printout hit him, and he injured his
leg when he slipped. What recourse does Paul have?
Answer: Workers' compensation will cover Paul's injuries if
they are work-related. Both injuries
are probably work-related, and Paul could recover from
workers' compensation. Because at least
the first was intentionally caused by the employer, Paul could
also sue Mary.
Diff: 2
Topic: Workers' Compensation Acts
Skill: Factual Application
66) The Bonzo Bike Accessory Company operates in a small
commercial building in Davis,
California. The company employs several people who make a
variety of bicycle accessories.
Mike Bonzo, the owner, has read carefully and knows that he is
complying with all of the
166. have the attorneys review them for
any needed revisions. Bob was excited to hear about the
promotion, but then was disappointed to
learn that he would not be getting a raise, and that the duties of
his job would not change much.
Bob's hourly wage was converted to a weekly salary based on
40 hours at his prior wage. No
overtime would be paid, which upset Bob because he had
averaged about 20-25 hours of
overtime per month, and always welcomed the opportunity to
earn extra money. The law firm
assured Bob that he would now be considered for a year-end
bonus based on performance and
contribution to the firm. The law firm became busier during the
year, and Bob increasingly had
to work overtime. He continued to do some drafting of contracts
as well as most of the word
processing for the real estate department. At the end of the year,
the firm announced that profits
were less than hoped for and that the maximum bonus would be
$100, which Bob received. Does
Bob have a claim to receive any additional compensation for his
work during the year?
Answer: Bob might have a promissory estoppel claim based on
the promise that he would
receive a bonus to make up for the loss of overtime pay. Bob
might also have a claim under the
Fair Labor Standards Act. It would depend on whether Bob truly
was an exempt employee or
whether the promotion and change to a salary basis of pay was
merely an attempt to avoid
paying overtime.
Diff: 3
Topic: Fair Labor Standards Act
Skill: Factual Application