1. S C E N A R I O S
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
W H Y
W H A T
H O W
Deep in our hearts,
we would all choose
a scenario with no
surprises. —Pierre Wack
2. W H Y S C E N A R I O S ?
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
BECAUSE WE CAN ACT
BECAUSE WE SEEK TO ANTICIPATE UNKNOWNS (DISCONTINUITIES)
BECAUSE TRANSISTIONS ARE ACCELERATING
3. W H Y N O W ?
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
BECAUSE WE CAN ACT
… at least more effectively
than we could before…
Technology
Climate models
Tracking sea ice/glacier loss
Satellite imagery
Spatial modeling
(Cellular Automata)
We understand better the
impact of our choices
We know we can do anything
we put our minds to
4. W H Y S C E N A R I O S ?
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
DISCONTINUITIES
i.e. atomic warfare: It’s not
about the future
(Herman Kahn).
We know the future will be
different from the past, so
why project?
Exogenous events
unanticipated by science
‘We live in Extremistan, not Mediocristan’
—Nassim Nicholas Taleb
5. C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
W H Y S C E N A R I O S ?
BECAUSE TRANSITIONS ARE ACCELERATING:
6. C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
P R E – T R A N S I T I O N
7. C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
P R E – T R A N S I T I O N
8. C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
P R E – T R A N S I T I O N
9. C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
P R E – T R A N S I T I O N
10. C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
P R E – T R A N S I T I O N
11. C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
P R E – T R A N S I T I O N
12. C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
P R E – T R A N S I T I O N
13. C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
F I R S T T R A N S I T I O N
14. C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
S E C O N D T R A N S I T I O N
15. C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
T H I R D T R A N S I T I O N
16. C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
S E C O N D A N D T H I R D T R A N S I T I O N
17. W H A T A R E S C E N A R I O S ?
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
AREN’T THESE PROJECTIONS? Top graphs more like scenarios
Timeline based on current
knowledge / technologies
18. W H A T A R E S C E N A R I O S ?
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
AREN’T THESE PROJECTIONS? Assumptions:
Policy likely inadequate
Markets likely to lead to regime
change
19. W H A T A R E S C E N A R I O S ?
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
AREN’T THESE PROJECTIONS? Assumptions:
Policy likely to favor natural gas
Markets likely to favor solar PV
20. W H A T A R E S C E N A R I O S ?
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
AREN’T THESE PROJECTIONS? Assumptions:
Markets lag on decarbonization
Policy best tool for eliminating
liquid fuels for passenger
vehicles
21. W H A T A R E S C E N A R I O S ?
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
Not about the future
Not about predictions
IT’S ABOUT CONSEQUENCES FROM CHOICES WE MAKE RIGHT NOW.
22. C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
LADIES HOME JOURNAL, 1900
F A L S E S O M E W H A T T R U E T R U T H Y
P O P U L A R S C E N A R I O S
23. C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN FOR HILDEBRAND’S CHOCOLATE, 1900 Themes: Transportation, Leisure
Allegory?: North Pole warming
Sci-Fi?
P O P U L A R S C E N A R I O S
24. C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
ADVERTISEMENT FROM JAPAN: MID-CENTURY Themes: Transportation,
Urbanization
P O P U L A R S C E N A R I O S
25. P O P U L A R S C E N A R I O S
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
FILM CONCEPT ART, 2006 Themes: Transportation,
Overconsumption, Hopelessness,
Urbanization
26. S C E N A R I O S N O W
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
APPLETON ON LYNAS
Six degrees of climate inferno:
Below 2˚ = avoid apocalypse.
IPCC hasn’t imagined
Dante’s darkest scenarios.
1˚
2˚
3˚
4˚
5˚
6˚
APOCALYPSENOAPOCALYPSE
?
NOIPCCDATA
7+˚
1˚
2˚
3˚
4˚
5˚
6˚
7˚
Drought in W. US
‘Day turns to night’
Flight from S. Spain
Super-hurricane
Odessa: Texas
Mass extinction
Beyond
IPCC estimate*
27. 3˚
S C E N A R I O S N O W
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
REVISED IPCC SCENARIOS (2013) * Predicted change from
period 1986-2005
Source: IPCC
2˚
4˚
5˚
6˚
7+˚
Predicted temperature increases under two scenarios
Rise in average surface temperature by 2081-2100*
Lowest scenario (RCP 2.6) Highest scenario (RCP 8.5)
28. C O N V E N T I O N A L
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
MARKET
FORTRESS
WORLD
ECO-
COMMUNAL
POLICY BARBARISM
NEW
SUSTAIN-
ABILITY
Growth outpaces efficiency
Private Sector, International
banks, WTO
UN is ‘toothless
Brown Tech
Government Initiatives
Global Citizens movement
May be sustainable,
but may be undesirable
Could evolve into
New Sustainability
'Planetary apartheid’
Rich in protective enclaves
Fortress collapse would
lead to breakdown
Breakdown
Think Mad Max
Could have a ‘second wind’,
evolving into Eco-Communalism
Earth Stewards
Think Gandhi and friends
in Hobbiton
Permaculture
Market-constraining policies
Poor and Rich de-polarize
UN supersedes nation-state
Green Tech
B R E A K D O W N S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y
29. W I N N E R S A N D L O S E R S
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
Private Sector
International banks, WTO
Brown Tech
Government
Global Citizens movement
The rich—sort-of
Survivalist enthusiasts
Hippies
Global Citizens Movement
The middle class
UN
Green Tech
MARKET
FORTRESS
WORLD
ECO-
COMMUNAL
POLICY BARBARISM
NEW
SUSTAIN-
ABILITY
30. W I N N E R S A N D L O S E R S
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
MARKET
FORTRESS
WORLD
ECO-
COMMUNAL
POLICY BARBARISM
NEW
SUSTAIN-
ABILITY
Governments
Private enterprise
The poor
Everyone
The rich
No-one
31. S C E N A R I O M A T R I X
OGILVY AND SCHWARTZ
List factors and trends
Choose 2 most critical
Assemble in matrix
List potential outcomes in
respective cells
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
Outcome
Outcome
Outcome
Outcome
A B
A
B
32. Pop. Growth
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
Outcome
Outcome
Outcome
Outcome
Low High
Low
High
EnergyDescent
Population growth
Global governance
Oil prices
Urbanization
Energy descent
Solar technology
Etc.
33. D I S C U S S I O N
C M P 6 9 6 0 G L O B A L S U S T A I N A B L E D E V E L O P M E N T
WHAT REASONS DO WE HAVE TO BE PESSIMISTIC / OPTIMISTIC?
WHAT DO WE THINK IS LIKELY?
WHAT ARE SOME DISCONTINUITIES WE HAVEN’T CONSIDERED?
Editor's Notes
I included the introductory photos by Ed Burtynsky to illustrate a common theme of scenarios: Our present time. I think the ‘no surprises’ sentiment is echoed in the Conventional scenarios put forward by Paul Raskin and Shell Oil Do we really anticipate ‘no surprises’? What is so unsurprising about the present?
There is more effort than ever underway to attempt to slow down global warming, but with population growth and a growing global auto-centric middle class, we’re worried we may not catch up with the possible climate catastrophe. We sense that we’ll need to be able to react to unknowns, but we know we have it in us to face it. We’ve observed great feats achieved throughout history.
We can act now for several reasons. We are motivated, and we sense that our means are improving. The effort underway to model climate change, land cover changes, urban growth, and more has given us better means toward envisioning scenarios.
Herman Kahn was depicted by Peter Sellers in the film, Dr. Strangelove. Kahn was a systems thinker known as the ‘father of scenario planning’ who could callously envision outcomes of even the darkest scenarios assuming rationality among game players. Scenarios are ‘not about the future’: we know anything can happen at any moment. These are discontinuities. I’ve been told that anticipating every possible outcome is madness. There are infinite possibilities (or as Douglas Adams coined, ‘Infinite Probabilities’.), so why do we try?
And speaking of history, we try because we have observed how human scenarios transitions have sped up. These are 1000-year increments.
The Early Civilization transition, catalyzed by written language.
…and we’re living in a climactic time. The modern transition:
The Planetary transition:
These are 100-year increments: What will the next transition be about? Would energy descent slow down the curve?
Aren’t these predictions / projections? GOOD QUESTION… Top graphs include more scenario ‘branching’… The Shell® scenario has two branches. I’ve reinterpreted Mountain and Ocean to line up with the Policy/Market scenarios from the Raskin piece. These are ‘conventional world’ scenarios in my opinion. Shell describes the difference thusly: “Mountains, where the benefits of an elevated position are exercised and protected, and those who are currently influential hold on to power; and wide Oceans with rising tides, strong currents, and a volatile churn of actors and events with an irregular accommodation of competing interests.”
I may be wrong in the reinterpretation of Mountain and Ocean, but it seems like the Mountain (top) scenario is more government-oriented, and the Ocean scenario is more free-market oriented.
Shell predicts that policy-based scenarios would lag behind market-based scenarios in energy transition.
There’s an elephant in the room, in my opinion. When are the Ice Caps projected to be gone? Are we accounting for discontinuity? How can we focus only on trends in modern energy alone when NASA’s scenarios focus on emerging trends in ocean current disruption, and scientists at Yale are looking at trends in acidification that would have consequences for marine life and warming intensification. Shell is conventionally-biased. Consider the source of scenarios.
We are not conventional as a whole. We live in Extremistan! We know how things go when we don’t prepare and react properly to crises in our own lives. We know this applies to the world at large. This graph is also taken from the Shell scenario document; an expanded scenario that envisions Bright Futures or Breakdown and Eco-communal revival as outlined by David Holmgren and Paul Raskin.
It’s interesting to see how scenarios have evolved over the last century. It highlights how quickly our world is transitioning in this Planetary phase.
Josie Aplleton critiques John Lynas’ global warming scenario. Lynas presents a linear climate model. He leaves no room for (positive?) discontinuities, like those put forth by Peter Schwartz. BUT (CLICK) as we’ll see in the next slide …
At the time of publishing, Lynas’ scenario didn’t include revised IPCC data. His scenarios are rooted, as Appleton points out, in moral meaning. If this is true, survivors of the apocalypse would end up colonizing space and leaving Earth behind, only to forget about it and relegate its memory to folklore (BSG).
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has now established that there is 95% certainty that humans are the dominant cause of global warming since the 1950s (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-24292615)
The Raskin scenarios. Two possible scenarios each of three courses of action: Do nothing (Conventional scenarios); accelerated capital accumulation and hoarding by the rich-- leading to breakdown; and Great Transitions, in either centralized or decentralized fashion. (CLICK) There is interplay between these scenarios that allows for the accounting of discontinuity.
Some winners in each scenario. We could discuss others.
Scenario losers. A very general conception.
An exercise we could do together. The Jay Ogilvy and Peter Schwartz 2 x 2 matrix scenario exercise!