Being Poor By Barbara Ehrenreich Analysis

Being Poor By Barbara Ehrenreich Analysis
In America, millions of people are affected by poverty. High–class members of America and companies take advantage of these lower class individuals.
Lower class individuals who are able to find a job usually work for less than minimum wage and experience poor working conditions. These lower
class workers do not deserve the lifestyle they must deal with. Low class individuals not only have to struggle with finding employment but also have
to worry about the U.S. government mistreating them. Whether someone is a low class immigrant or U.S. born citizen, it is evident people in
America treat their lower class citizens poorly. First, there is a huge number of poor people in America being affected by the government mistreating
them. In the article, "How the Poor Are Made to Pay for Their Poverty," Barbara Ehrenreich shows the difficulty of being poor in America.
Ehrenreich states, "Being poor itself is not yet a crime, but in at least a third of the states, being in debt can now land you in jail" (381). The
government makes it even harder for people struck by poverty. It seems law enforcement singles out poor people and fines them for ridiculous things
such as, not being able to pay for their children education, having a messy yard, or littering. Also, Ehrenreich notes, "If we take an extremely low ball
$200 per misdemeanor, and bear in mind that 80–90% of criminal offenses are committed by people who are officially indigent, them local
governments are using law enforcement to
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Old Poor Law Summary
The Elizabethan Poor Law, commonly known as the Old Poor Law, was instituted in 1601 as a method to manage poor relief in the midst of societal
and economic shifts. Since the 1960s comparative analyses and case studies have been central to a revisionist historiographical approach. Historians
such as A.L. Beier and Paul Slack, following in the footsteps of E.P. Thompson, reshaped the way that the history of the poor laws was being made in
the 1980s through their use of social history. Their examinations ofpoverty during Tudor and Stuart England through the use of governmental statutes
and proclamations, as well as local sources, set the stage for later histories of poverty and poor relief. However, their work at the local level left
something ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It displays the value of social history to the subject by examining vagrants, not simply vagrancy legislation. With Masterless Men, Beier gave agency to
vagrants of the time. As he stated: "Sixteenth– and early seventeenth–century vagrancy involved more than being poor and rootless. It was the product
of profound social dislocations– a huge and growing poverty problem, disastrous economic and demographic shifts and massive migration– and had
important political consequences." Beier's work truly shows the values of examining the context of vagrancy and legislation through a social lens that
captures more than a strict examination of official records. Future scholarship should continue to focus on the actual context of vagrant life and the
political and economic dimensions of the influence of vagrancy on the ground level. However, Beier's insistence that historians that focused on
demographics were weak is overstated. Beier himself devoted a great deal of time to demographic shifts in his own text, which makes his own critique
questionable. Demographics are a valuable aspect of the type of social history that can benefit the understanding of vagrancy in the

Debt Relief Initiatives in Poor Countries
Debt Relief initiative
Many governmental and non–governmental organizations argued that external constraint like high inherited levels of foreign debt have crippled in the
capacity of low income countries to overcome poverty and that concessional lending's are not enough. This lead to the 'Enhanced Heavily Indebted
Poor Country (HIPC)' initiative in 1996 in collaboration with world bank to eliminate unsustainable debt in the world's poorest and most heavily
indebted countries.
A summit meeting in 1999 expanded the spectrum of eligible countries for debt relief with higher and faster reliefs. This came to be known as
Enhanced HIPC Initiative.
The aim of Enhanced HIPC initiative was to achieve a level of indebtedness that would enable the country to service its debt in a sustainable manner.
The program compares the actual level of indebtedness and debt–servicing burden to a constant theoretical sustainable level which is predetermined by
the large industrial countries to which these debt are owed. Currently, the maximum net present value of sustainable debt–to–exports is 150 percent (of
traditional 200%– 250%) or debt–to–fiscal revenue is 250 percent (of traditional 280%). The enable countries qualify for debt relief in two stages:
In the first stage:
The debtor's country has to create a satisfactory track record in an IMF or IDA program and demonstrate the capacity to use IMF assistance prudently.
Once the country is considered eligible, the data is processed.
The

How Did Workhouses Help Poor People Were Treated In The 1800s
During the Victorians period, around 1800, poor people were taking care by buying food and cloths thanks to money collected from land owners
and wealthy people. But when the Poor Law Amendment Act were proclaimed in 1834, everything changed. The Poor Law mentioned that no
poor people could get help unless they went to live in special workhouses. The idea behind workhouses was that poor people were helped and that
they eventually supported themselves by working in there. Poor people worked at workhouses in order to have food, a place to live, clothes,
education and medical care. In workhouses lived poor people, orphaned and abandoned children, physically and mentally sick people, disabled ones,
elderly people, widows and unmarried women. Workhouses used to be very large. The idea sounded good: help poor people. But the reality was
different. In that period, people couldn't understand poor people. They couldn't realize why they were poor, and poor population growth very fast, so,
in order to control this situation, they created the workhouses. They didn't wanted more poor people, so they made sure that people feared the
workhouses and that they would do anything to keep out of that places. And poor ones were right to fear workhouses, because life in there was terrible.
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They were punished if they tried to communicate with their relatives in there, so most families never saw again their relatives once their entered to
workhouses. They had to wear a uniform in order to outside people knew that they were poor. They even were stripped and bathed under
supervision. Education for children was poor and they couldn't learn to read and write, and some child were sold to work in factories and mines.
Workhouses were a tool to humiliate people, and most of this people never get out of that places (at least not alive or

The Importance Of Poor People Stay Poor
"Decisions are the frequent fabric of our daily design." Black Americans are at greater risk of being poor because of individual effort and racial
discrimination. Our decisions that we do change the outcome of our lives, but discrimination can change that. One major factor that influences
why poor people stay poor is an individual effort. "Half of the black Americans born poor stay poor. High income is less likely for Black
Americans than White Americans. Even Blacks who make it to the middle class are likely to see their kids fall down the ladder."(Five Bleak Facts
on Black Opportunity). This shows that the jobs that the Black Americans can afford to get, are not enough to get them to the middle class. If they
do make it to the middle class they are most likely to see their kids fail. Their kids are already in the middle class, they need to keep working as their
parents have but they choose not to. "We should find ways to greatly convince young people that their decisions will greatly influence whether they
avoid poverty and enter the middle class. Let politicians and school teachers drill into these children's minds, the message of a free society. They should
enter adulthood with three major responsibilities; Finish High School, Get a full–time job and wait until age 21 to get married and have children.
People are capable of understanding principles and of using them to make decisions. anyone who delivers a message about consequences and decisions
that could affect them

Why the Poor Stay Poor
In recent times we have seen the income distribution in many developed nations expand, meaning that the gap between rich and poor has grown.
Coupled with this is the resultant degradation of economic and social mobility. This serves to show that they there is a tendency for those that are
poor, to remain poor. There are a number of causal factors that seemingly predicate this fate of apoverty cycle. The issues that contribute to this range
from the education and wellbeing of the individual, societal influences and values, their spending habits, their living conditions as well as their ability
to access funding as a means of fuelling entrepreneurial endeavours.
Those that are born into poor families will not have access to the resources ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Not only does this make it incredibly difficult to break out of poverty but it also goes a long way to shaping the attitudes and values of the poor. The
poor will consider the acquisition of credit as something that is impossible and will therefore have no determination to obtain it. These attitudes become
engrained in a community and unfortunately goes a long way to shaping the economic outlook of a communities respected constituents.
It can be seen that there are a multitude of reasons that the poor tend to remain poor. Reasons ranging from the spending patterns of the poor to the
health and nutrition of the poor all attribute to the creation of a poverty cycle that seemingly condemns the poor to being poor. Obviously this isn't a
rule of thumb but rather an accurate observation, it is not to say that the poor can't become affluent but rather the conditions and environment that
surrounds those who are poor severely impedes their ability to earn an income and move over the poverty

Elizabethan Poor Essay
During the colonial period, the Elizabethan poor laws were adopted to address the social issue of poverty.
Residency was a main factor in determining who was eligible for aid. Categories "worthy" and "unworthy" were set to determine who would qualify
for assitance. Unfortunately the individuals in the "unworthy" category were the very individuals more in need of assistance. They were the Unmarried
pregnant women, those who were considred able bodied, as well as the "drunkards".
If a family was in need, their immediate family would be responsible to aid them, if for any reason their family was not able to assist, aid would be
given by the authorities. Widowed women, as well as handicap individuals were considered to be in need by no fault ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
When authorties noticed housing the needy was becoming to expensive, they determined it would be less expensive for families to care for their own
relative in the home and receive aid for them.
While the coloniest resided on land having once belonged to the Native Americans, The Native Americans were not eligible for aid.
While the main idea of the Elizabethan poor law has continued in todays society, the society takes care of those who are in need. Social Welfare of
today has seen value assisting those who had once been considered unworthy. Rather then leaving the child to the unwed mother in need, (by no fault
of their own) Programs have been put in place to assist the mother of the child with furthering their education, child care, if necessary parenting classes,
as well as financial assistance, for food, and housing situations. This aid directly assist the unwed mother in being able to care for her child long term,
with short term assistance.
In today's society, there are drug an alcohol programs to assist those who would have been considered unworthy. The aid in sobriety, as well as mental
health, counseleling, assistance with possible PTSD, or self victimization. Assist the once substance abuser into becoming a sober, able bodied member
of society

Poor Law Amendment Act
Poor Law was the why in which poor people of the 19th century got help to survive either by receiving money or recourses. Additionally, in the 19th
century there was a prevailing emphasis on individualism and non–intervention by the state. The way in which they received help was either from the
help of local parishes, churches or through self–help. Additionally,Poor Law was in place to help people who could not work due to health or disability,
and these people were considered the 'deserving' poor.
Also, people who chose not to work but could work, were classed as the 'undeserving' poor. Yet they both still needed help to get the means they
needed to get by in life. A royal commission was set up in 1832 to investigate the Poor Law system.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Additionally, many local officials felt that the old system worked better and that there was no need for a new one. Furthermore, the taxes that upper and
middle–class people had to pay to look after the poor were minor and the system was adapted to the local area. Likewise, people felt very disconsolate
with what they examined as interference by people from London. This led to Anti–Poor Law committees being set up to dispute against the Poor Law
Amendment Act. The committees formed meetings and petitions calling for the act to be

The Poor Laws And The Problems Of The Old Poor Law
According to the University of York Social Policy is the "Study of the causes of social problems and what Governments attempt to do about them."
The Poor Law that was introduced in 1834 was a Law that was put in place to support the poor. The law was introduced because it was getting
increasingly expensive to look after the poor so parliament introduced it in hopes it would diminish the cost of looking after the poor and to get the
poor out of the streets and into workhouses. Parliament promised that this new law was to give the poor Clothes, free education, food and a place to stay.
The Poor Law was introduced because it was too much money to pay to look after the poor, so in hopes to take the poor off the streets and to stop
money going to the poor the government introduced the law in 1834. The law was also put in place to embolden the poor to get back into work
and support themselves, There was a law before 1834 called the "Old Poor Law" this was found to be insufficient because there was nothing in
place to help the poor because even though they set up workhouses for the poor they didn't offer accommodation for the poor. There was an act
passed in 1795 called "The Speenhamland System" which allowed employers to pay their workers exceptionally low wages during these years the
middle and the upper classes were getting more angry because they were the ones paying for the poor who would avoid not going to or do any work.
The two main principles of the Poor Law Commission

Poor Countries Remain Poor
When discussing poverty, it is difficult to pinpoint one simple reason that explains why poor countries remain poor. However, patterns may be drawn
when looking at states' history during European colonization. The notion that the existence or absence of European settlers largely shaped political
institutions within states is supported by the two different institution types: representative institutions and extractive institutions. European settlers
promoted their own wants through strong, representative institutions in colonized states. These states, such as the United States or Australia, are
considered wealthy countries today, whereas today's poor countries, including the Democratic Republic of Congo and Somalia, were colonized by
European settlers as extractive institutions. In this paper, I will argue that, poor countries remain poor because the weak political institutions inherited
by extractive states under colonial regimes persist, making it difficult to develop an appropriate relationship between the state and the market and degree
of state intervention in the economy.
Even though colonial regimes eventually ended, the extractive state's weak political institutions persisted for three main possibilities, according to
Daron Acemoglu. The first possibility he and coauthors (2001) point to is the fact that "setting up institutions that place restrictions on government
power and enforce property rights is costly" (1376). When new elites inherit extractive institutions,

Tudor Times: Appropriate For The Poor In Victorian England
During the Tudor times in England, life was hard for the poor people while being more convenient for the rich. The poor inhabitants had small, dirty
homes, usually with only one room for the whole family. They had homes made of straw; the rich could afford brick and had clean furniture with extra
glass windows. According to these facts, the government should have donated more money and resources to the poor to maintain better homes. To
begin with, the furniture and other appliances were very dirty. Next, the villagers did not have much right over their property in that time.
First, the poor people could not afford clean homes and were therefore stuck with contaminated appliances, which got dirty from the floor of dirt. It
accumulated on the peoples' clothes and belongings. For instance, the toilet was a cheap way of going to the washroom because it was simply a hole
in wood into a bowl or into the ground. The problem was that it contaminated the air which made the villagers smell bad. This led the richer people to
disrespect them. Therefore, the toilet was an example of contamination in the house that defined the poor as they were in that time. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
They could not afford proper community services for everyone due to their poverty. For example, the water sewage was not well controlled. The poor
people were too great, so they could not afford to filter clean water for everyone. The villages had to survive with it but also drank other liquids like
wine once in a while. So, the contaminated water was a problem for the people's' health because it affected their bodies and gave them

The Elizabethan Poor Law
The Elizabethan Poor Law was passed in 1601 as a state response to the dire need of the poor in British North America and acted as "measures for
the relief of destitution" (Fowle, 1881, p.55). Previously, the Catholic Church was Britain's state church, but on the decision of Henry VIII, the state
would become the source of aid for the poor (Finkel, 2006). Simultaneously, the feudal system was winding down in England along with the societal
norm that serfs were the responsibility of landlords so as the textile industry grew, tenants were evicted to create space for sheep due to the demand for
their wool (Finkel, 2006). As the changes in structures and industry took place, Finkel (2006) notes that there was an increasing number of homeless...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(p. 57)
A formal eligibility system would be enacted to establish who were the "poor in very deed" and the Elizabethan Poor Law would be born.
Poor Laws, Politics, and Ideologies
Fowle (1881) notes that "at no time were the vagrancy laws more severe or more severely administered than in the reign of Henry VIII" and this
was also a time of great social and religious hardship (p. 56). The change in the role of the Church in terms of aiding the poor as well as the decline
of the English feudal system, and the growing textile industry, created an increasing number of poor and the need for inexpensive labour. With the
varying societal changes as well as the shifting relationship between Church and state, inevitably this caused a strain between labour and profit. The
ideas which influenced the Poor Law were that of a laissez–faire style government, the idea of "less eligibility", and the principle of the "perception of
needs". It was deemed that "state–aided workers should earn less than privately employed workers...so as to avoid any upward pressures on wages in
the private sector" (Finkel, 2006, p. 50). The discrepancy between the wages of state labourers and privately employed workers was supported by the
laissez–faire government as well as neoliberalist ideals. There was also the

Poverty, Poor, And Poor
The concepts of "worthy" and "unworthy" poor came about during the English Poor Laws that were introduced in the 1500's. The English poor laws
classified poor or dependent people into three major categories and established many requirement before aid was provided. Dependent persons were
categorized as: vagrant (nomadic; with no permanent home or employment), the involuntary unemployed and the helpless. In effect, the poor laws
separated the poor into two classes which were the worthy and the unworthy. The worthy were classified as orphans, widows, handicapped, or the frail
elderly. The unworthy were the drunkards, suspicious, or lazy. (Hansan, J.E. (2011). Poor relief in early America) A major theme that was established
during this time... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The workers saw the persistent abuse of immigrants, the terrible working conditions in factories and sweatshops, and the failure of public officials to
enforce laws. Settlement house residents soon learned that the conditions of the poor people in the neighborhoods were most often not the result of
choice but of necessity. These discoveries led to the house residents acting as advocates on behalf of immigrants and their neighborhoods. Some even
organized English classes and immigrant protective associations. At the same time as the settlement houses were in effect, the charities were being
discouraged from giving public relief, during a period of financial crisis and unemployment. The society went into chaos and the charities began to
panic. Due to the overwhelming amount of relief necessary, charity workers argued that there needed to be a scientific way to establish who would get
relief. Therefore, private charities were combined into an organization called the COS, and others like it followed. These organizations were there to
conduct investigations and distinguish the worthy from the unworthy poor and based on their findings, refer them to relief agencies. Where the COS
blamed the poor for their situation, the settlement houses strived to prove that it was a societal issue. The settlement houses paved the way for
community organization and didn't focus on the COS's distinction of worthy and unworthy. The social workers in the settlement houses focused on
reducing

How Does Social Security Help To Underdeveloped Poor...
Picture years down the road, you are trying to get ahead in life, but debt continues to drag you down. A family to provide for and someone is
constantly breathing down your neck to pay your debts. Can you imagine the sudden relief, of your debt being paid, every hard–earned penny being
your own, and finally your family having enough food on the table.
Now lets apply this to underdeveloped poor countries. As the country struggles to get ahead, international lenders drown them in their overwhelming
debt, preventing them from every rising to the surface.
Thus my first contention is Mercy. Mercy is having compassion or forgiveness shown toward someone whom it is within one's power to punish or
harm. As God has mercy on us, we should have mercy on others. God commands us to be perfect, holy, and righteous, but these traits are unattainable
and God sovereignly understands, daily pouring His mercy out on us. By the same token, indebted poor countries cannot live up to the ... Show more
Imagine receiving news that your husband is dead. Three kids to provide for and you just lost your job. What are you going to do? If you are an
American, social security may help to soften the financial nose dive. The definition of social security according to Merriam–Webster is: A program in
which the government provides money to people who are unable to work because they are old, disabled, or unemployed. This is the highest act of
humaneness. How does this apply to our resolution? As an American, you cannot be against removing the debt of highly indebted countries unless you
also condemn social security. Social security is there to soften the blow of individuals with health problems, unemployment, and old age. If social
security wasn't there, what would these individuals do? Go into debt, for they simply cannot work. Thus international lenders parallel social security,
the main difference they demand a return

Poor Law Amendment Act Research Paper
What, in your view, was the short term significance of the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act?
The 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act changed the law that was already in place, to centralise the relief given, and bring in more regulations. Outdoor
relief was abolished for the able–bodied, and workhouses were to be established in parishes, or within unions of parishes. Under the Act, ratepayers in
each union or parish elected a board of guardians to supervise the workhouse and send reports to the Poor Law Commissioners, who were appointed by
the government and responsible for overseeing the implementation of the Act across the countries. Furthermore, the Act aimed to create workhouses as
a last resort, and make the regulations and conditions dismal enough ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Nottinghamshire Guardian in 1849 reported an inquest at the Southwell Union Workhouse due to the death of a 4 year old girl, due to her being
with her mother in the workhouse and becoming injured by the boiling water her mother was using. This shows how segregation was not being
practically used, even though it was outlined in the Act. This could show that there was not as much of a significant different following the act, in
many ways because of the lack of regulation and the small amount of overseers. This source can be considered a more truthful representation of how
workhouses truly were than from the idea given by the official documentation that was published in order to make the workhouses look successful.
However, this is an independent event and does not represent the conditions in every workhouse, and furthermore the conditions in the whole of the
particular workhouse. Therefore, segregation could have been apparent in many other places and aspects, but not at this time, showing a potential lack
of regulation and following of the rules outlined by the Poor Law

Poor Kids Documentary Analysis
In the 2012 documentary Poor Kids, children living in the Quad Cities reflect on their lives in poverty. Each story is different but similar in many
ways. At the time of the film, there were sixteen million children reported who were affected by poverty. The film also stated that one in five children
were living in poverty. With large quantities of children being affected by poverty, the important to understand how these children are dealing with the
factors of poverty.
Three different children; Brittany, Kaylie, and Jasmine as well their families were followed by cameras through the hardships of poverty. These
families slowly trickled their way into poverty. For example, Brittany and Jasmin's families both suffered a blow to their main income which was a
major contribution to their lives in poverty. For these children and many like them, they do not have the choice to escape poverty. Their parents are
their main providers and are responsible to supply a proper living environment such as shelter, food, and water. Children can not contribute significant
amounts of money to help their families survive. For example, Kaylie collects metal cans around her neighborhood to receive two to five cents for
each can, depending on ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Due to the increased costs of living, it was later increased to $7.25. Also discussed in lecture, the cost of living has increased but the wages have not.
This is a contribution to many living in poverty, like the families in the film. Services such as unemployment and TANF are available to individuals
who qualify, but there are specific time limits to receiving those benefits. Many of the individual's struggle at a personal level which contributes
problem of poverty. With low minimum wages and higher cost of living, many families and individuals can not escape poverty. It is nearly impossible
for families to survive on minimum wage and

Working Poor : The Work Poor
Elizabeth McCumber
April 24, 2015
Working poor paper
Throughout both in–class discussions, and David Shipler's "The Working Poor: Invisible in America" we learned being poor in America is anything
but easy. Even with all of our government assistance programs such as Medicaid and Welfare, many family generation after generation seem to fall
below the poverty line and create a life of struggle and long way out for their families. When Shipler is explaining different families and their lac of
self control in saving the little money they do earn, it makes you question if the have the know how to get out of poverty, or even in some cases even
want to due to their different spending habits than successful people, falling into credit traps, and buying the un–necessary. Part of the issue as
displayed through this book is that families truly have no since of fear with money. If they make money then continue to spend poorly and loose
their money, they are back to where they started. This is what they know and what they are comfortable with. If a wealthy person, or even middle
class family looses their money, they are in a new place, a place of fear. They have never lived this way before and all of their expenses are above
what they have lost. There is also no since of saving with in the working poor community. When you are living on a minim wage pay check living
week to week, you are putting all you have to support your family and to put food on the table, not to put money away

Poor Richard And A Description Of New England: A Literary...
In the books, Poor Richard by Ben Franklin and A Description of New England by John Smith both believe that hard work can lead to a fortunate life.
Franklin and Smith discuss that one's outlook in life reflects their well–being. Positivity and self–determination can encourage one to become
successful. By comparing the stories of John Smith and Benjamin Franklin, one may conclude that even though they both face obstacles that hinder
their goals, their optimism, shown through maxims and frontier mythos, helped them achieve a well–thought out and successful life.
In Poor Richard, Franklin's aphorisms describe a prosperous life with the power of determination. One of Franklin's most famous quote used to
motivate lazy people to work if they want

What Does It Mean To Say That The Rich Get Richer And The...
"There, the poor are not oppressed, the rich are not privileged. . . . Their taxes are few because their government is just; and as there is nothing to
render them wretched, there is nothing to engender riots and tumults." "I'm asking for the vote of every single African–American citizen. You're living in
poverty. Your schools are no good. You have no jobs.
African–Americans, now 45 percent poverty in the inner cities. The education is a disaster. Jobs are essentially nonexistent." "In the end, you're
measured not by how much you undertake but by what you finally accomplish." These quotes are all by our current president, Donald Trump. Pain
states that "the poor are not oppressed, the rich are not privileged". Trump and Paine have two totally different views when it comes to money. The
sad thing is that what Trump believes most Americans also believe. I have been on both sides of poor and wealthy. I have seen both sides from
both perspectives. Many wealthy people would say "who provides the jobs?" and others would reply saying "we do!" and thinks it is fine. The only
reason why the poor are offered jobs is that the so–called wealthy people are too lazy to do the work. The phrase "the rich get richer and the poor get
poorer" is very accurate in the US today. I believe that Paine's beliefs in 1791 and views would change if he lived in 2018. I am a firm believer that
people are judged more on money than any other aspects of life. Some of the most successful people today have

Elizabethan Poor Law Research Paper
Despite previous efforts to provide assistance to the poor, the Elizabethan Poor Law was the first national policy enacted to do so. This law
required parish governments to tax households and distribute aid to the "deserving" poor. Those that were considered deserving of aid were people
unable to work due to disability or old age. This corresponds to today's Supplemental Security Income program. This is also a national, or better
currently known as federal, policy that is designed to provide assistance to people with little income. It, too, determines those that are deserving of
assistance as people who are elderly or who have a disability.
The Elizabethan Poor Law required Overseers to provide the poor with either money or some form of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(2002) The 1601 Elizabethan Poor Law. Retrieved on 5/15/18; From: http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/elizpl.html Jansson, B. (2014).
Fashioning a New Society in the Wilderness (pp. 64–95). The reluctant welfare state: Engaging history to advance social work practice in contemporary
Society (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Policy Basics: Supplemental Security Income. (2017, October 25). Retrieved 5/15/18; From https://www.cbpp.org/research/social–security
/policy–basics–supplemental–security–income U.S. Social Policy Histor: Overview. (n.d.). Retreived 5/15/18, from: https://lmscontent.embanet.com
/UNR/MSW/SW630/media/presentations/unr_sw_630_01_overview.html Youth & Labor. (2016, January 25). Retrieved 5/15/18; From:

The American Dream : Why The Country Is A Mere Fantasy For...
The American Dream: Why the Impoverished Will Just Have to Keep Dreaming
The American Dream is an idea that needs no introduction: it has been embedded into our minds since elementary school by our history textbooks,
teachers, and parents. It's an unwritten rule for many adults – keep the American Dream alive in our next generation. And why shouldn't we? Our
country's proud history is stuffed with so many rags to riches stories that the American Dream becomes self–evident. America truly is the land of
opportunity, so why are many of our poverty stricken citizens stuck at the bottom? Has the dream become a mere fantasy for the poor? One may say
that it is possible for most Americans to climb the social hierarchy, but many are unwilling to do what is necessary. While I do concede that it may be
possible to climb the social ladder, I'd argue that the negative affect poverty has on job opportunities and mental health rig the system so that the
opportunity simply does not exist for the poor.
Don't get me wrong, the dream is not dead for the poor. There must be a few exceptions to the rule. A Pew study finds that four percent of people born
into poverty work their way up into the higher classes. Four is not that bad; the ratio isn't flattering, but some are still achieving the American Dream. A
more unfortunate number is 70 – the percent of men and women born, raised, and perished in poverty (see fig. 1). The overwhelming majority of those
born into low income houses will

The American Dream Is A Mere Fantasy For The Poor Essay
The American Dream is an idea that needs no introduction: it has been embedded into our minds since elementary school by our history textbooks,
teachers, and parents. It's an unwritten rule for many adults – keep the American Dream alive in our next generation. And why shouldn't we? With all
of the countless rags to riches stories bred through our county's proud history, the American Dream becomes self–evident. America truly is the land of
opportunity; so why are most of our poverty stricken citizens stuck at the bottom? Has the dream become a mere fantasy for the poor? One may say
that it is possible for almost all poor Americans to climb the social hierarchy, but they unwilling to put in the effort necessary. While I do concede that
it may be possible to climb the social ladder, I'd argue that the negative affect poverty has on work and mental health rig the system so that the
opportunity simply does not exist for the poor.
Don't get me wrong, the dream is not dead for the poor. There must be a few exceptions to the rule. A Pew study finds that four percent of people born
into poverty work their way up into the higher classes. Four is not too terrible; the ratio isn't flattering, but some are still achieving the American
Dream. A more unfortunate number is 70– the percent of men and women born, raised, and perished in poverty (see fig. 1). The overwhelming
majority of those born into low income houses will statistically never escape. Poverty isn't just a problem; it is

Benjamin Franklin And His Conversation, Poor Richard's...
In Benjamin Franklin's publication, Poor Richard's Almanac, he is directing his almanac towards the common people. Franklin took pleasure into
creating his almanacs which led him into a wealthy direction. In Document 1, Franking states in his almanac "While thou art putting Pence in my
Pocket, and furnishing my Cottage with Necessaries, Poor Dick is not unmindful to do something for thy Benefit." Franklin proclaims his view on
human nature by indicating that he gets his wealthy from the numerous amount of people purchasing his almanac. In addition, he subtly describes
human nature by making jokes throughout his almanac to keep the audience attentive. However, Franklin's almanac is slightly different from
Whitefield and Edwards due to the fact that he does not emphasize religious beliefs nearly as much as the other two authors but gives practical advice.
With that being said, Franklin's main motive was to keeps his readers interested with the anticipation of getting profit.... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In Document 2, Whitefield states in his sermon "I pray you therefore be gold with your Father, saying, "Abba, Father," Satan troubles me, the world
troubles me, my own mother's children are angry with me; heavenly Father, pled my cause!" With this being said, Whitefield declares his view on
human nature by being optimistic and giving hope to his readers. In addition, Whitefield wants his readers to have a strong one on one relationship
with God. Furthermore, Whitefield's sermon is similar to Franklin's almanac due to the fact that both authors provide advice to their readers and they
are informal readings. Moreover, Whitefield's sermon is similar to Edwards in regards to God and religion. Whitefield's inspires his audience to
personally connect with God and provide a leeway to

The History Of Social Work
The history of social work demonstrates how statutory and voluntary agencies adapted to the changing social conditions and increasing societal
problems as a result of influence of industrialization and urbanization (Red). Social and economic changes such as the Black Death that severed the
British populations, the closure of common land for self–profit in the 1530s, and unrest and riots during the 1700s left many people in need alone and
without care from their families (lecture). Industrialization and urbanization created a widespread movement toward cities, separation over wealth and
classes, and caused challenges which established systems of care could not longer cope with (lecture). During the late 16th century, the population in
the United Kingdom increased by 25% and widespread famine contributed to the increasing poverty rate, which called for a new system of help for the
poor (black). Over almost a 400–year period, poor laws were established in the United Kingdom to provide systematic help for those facing poverty.
Within the United Kingdom, there was a division of approaches to address rising social problems (lecture). England and Whales created the Elizabethan
Poor Law Act of 1601 to classify the poor into categories and allocate responsibility of care and control for these classifications. The poor law
separated those who could not work versus those who would not work in three ways: the 'impotent poor', the aged, chronically sick, or mentally ill; the
'able–bodied poor', those who could work but didn't; and the 'able–bodied poor' who absconded or refused work (red). The 'impotent poor' were housed
in voluntary institutions under the care of parishes and churches whereas the 'able–bodied poor' were sent to statutory workhouses or 'house of
correction' punishment facilities (red). The Poor Law Act of 1601 sought to make a distinction between individuals who were poor by no fault of their
own and individuals who were to blame for there poverty, and thus putting them in the care of either the state or private sectors (red).
Workhouses were some of the most inhumane aspects of history and a "dark space in the public imagination" (red). Under public authority, these
institutions had harsh conditions,

Elizabethan Poor Law 1601
Elizabethan Poor Laws
The Human Services world we know today is based on a law that started back in the 15th century. Before the Reformation, it was considered a
religious duty to assist the poor. However, after the establishment of the Church of England, those duties seemed to slowly decimate. Queen Elizabeth I,
also known as the Virgin Queen, started the Poor Act of 1601 These laws were implemented in English society to assist those in need of help. Thus,
giving human services a foundation.
Queen Elizabeth I was the daughter of King Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn. After Anne was beheaded, Elizabeth lost the title of Princess and became a
lady after she was deemed illegitimate. It was not until Catherine Parr married her father that Elizabeth got her education. After her father died,
Elizabeth's nine–year–old brother became king. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After twenty–five years, the Parliament created the post of the Overseer of the Poor. It was not until four more years later in 1601 that all the prior
laws were lumped together created the Elizabethan Poor Law of 1601.
This law required two Overseers of the Poor to be selected by each parish. It was the Overseer's job to see what the financial needs wherein their
parish, then they would have to set up a poor tax. Thus collecting it from landowners in the said parish. Then they would be overseeing the money or
food is giving to the poor and supervising the almshouses.
The system that the Poor Law of 1601 has brought has greatly established the human services here in modern America. To be specific, the system for
food stamps and cash assistance is the very same way. In order to be granted food stamps, you must show that you are in one of the three categories,
idled poor, able–bodied poor, or impotent poor. With the proof, the people within the offices are able to determine how much you can get and if you
can find a job to help you get back on your

1601 Poor Law Essay
In the 16th century the Welfare State was non–existent in Britain. The result of this was the increase in people subjected to living in absolute poverty
due to them not having the basic living requirements. They also had no access to services such as health care, or education as these were not free
institutions. The ruling era of Queen Elizabeth I identified that the paupers required some form of help and as a result introduced the 'Act for the
Relief of the Poor' in 1601. This was the beginning of state intervention. It was a national policy set up, that was governed at local level. The purpose
of the act was to prevent the poor from becoming vagrants. This meant local parishes dealt with providing a minute amount of support for... Show more
The conclusion on the '1601 Poor Law' was that the outdoor relief which was provided by through local parishes was increasing and creating a
generation of workers to endure an idleness attitude. So consequently the 1601 Act was abolished after 200 years due to the effect of the Industrial
Revolution. It was then replaced with the 'Poor Law Amendment Act 1834' that was created to reduce expenditure on aiding the poor apart from those
in exceptional circumstances. The concept of the act was to create a system based upon the workhouse. A workhouse was an institution built to provide
the paupers with accommodation, clothing and food in exchange for long hours of manual labour. The families who entered the workhouse were
segregated from one another, forced to oblige by strict rules and wear uniform provided. The conditions within the workhouse were deliberately
inhumane and workers were treated terribly. However this was the only alternative for the poor as they had no other means of receiving finical
support. This was part of the procedure to reduce the number of paupers from seeking support from the state and create

Essay on The Poor Law
The Poor Law
The Poor Law was a system established since the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, about two hundred years before the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834.
In this system the able–bodied poor should be set to work, whilst the others had to be provided for by their parish of birth. By 1795 when the whole
system was under strain, an attempted solution was the Speenhamland system also know as the allowance system that was devised in 1795. This was
devised to relieve the acute distress of the poor by giving money to families calculated according to the number of children and the price of bread.
As the Poor Law was becoming increasingly costly throughout the years, there had to be change in order ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It was obvious that the same new measures were needed primarily to save money on the rates but also possibly to tackle the causes of poverty. No
solution appeared other than the complete abolishment of the poor allowance, which few wanted. Under the allowance system, one could work and
receive outdoor relief in the form of cash payments as long as you resided in the parish of your birth. This system was said to encourage laziness as
the poor would have no incentive to work hard or to respect their employers as they knew that their parish would look after them. The allowance
system was regarded by the ruling class as an 'unmitigated evil'. Payment of allowances was thought to encourage reckless breeding and immorality
and the inflated poor–rates were a grievance burden on agriculture, hindering investment and enterprises, crushing the small tenant or freeholder.
Farmers no longer had to pay their labourers decent wages when they could get relief from the parish.
The administration of the Poor relief and contracts for Poor Law work for supplying food, were awarded to local tradesmen rather than put to open
tender. Overseers were the ones who would determine who was 'deserving' and who was 'undeserving'. But concerned ratepayers suggested that these
two sections were one way in which vested interests were exploiting the system. This led to criticisms towards these as it was believed that

The First English Poor Law Legislation
16th century – The first English Poor Law legislation.
According to Spicker (2014) the English Poor Laws were a system of poor relief which existed until the emergence of the modern welfare state
after the Second World War. These laws purpose was provision for 'setting the poor on work '. The parish was the basic unit of administration. People
were tied to particular locations. If they tried to get relief outside the parish of their birth they could be 'removed' which means not given relief or
transported to another parish. The Poor Laws relief did not generally include accommodation but in 17th century first few workhouses were established.
In Scotland they were called 'houses of correction'.
Workhouse is 'a building where very poor people in Britain used to work, in the past, in exchange for food and shelter' (Cambridge Dictionaries Online,
2015, available online at http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/workhouse, retrieved on 07 June 2015).
19th century – The increase of poor and working class population due to mass industrialisation and capitalism leaded to development of more central
and state–controlled but still basic welfare system.
1834 – The Poor Law Amendment Act sets up a national Poor Law Commission which was a start point to state education and health care system.
1839–1840 – The Poor Law Commission enquiry identified disease as a major cause of 'pauperism'.
1842 – The Poor Law Commission report identifying sanitation as a principal issue for

Social Policies In The Poor Law ( 1834.
Social policies the fundamental principles in which a society is based. Created to tackle poverty, protect society addressing issues such as social
welfare, justice and individual wellbeing. By 1834 the government were under fierce criticism due to rising and mounting costs of looking after the
poor, it became clear a change was needed to fix problems in society. The government brought in an amendment act titled thePoor Law (1834) which
was designed to reduce the cost of looking after the poor, passed by parliament this new law meant anyone seeking relief from poverty had to now enter
a workhouse (BBC–Bitesize, 2017). In the early 1800's the population was rapidly rising, an industrial revolution, the development of towns and the
first experience of modern unemployment caused problems within British society (Spicker, 2017). There was suspicion from middle and upper–class
taxpayers that their money encouraged the poor to be lazy and avoid work, Squandering money on alcohol and tobacco. In addition, this encouraged the
poor to have more children in which they could not afford to support causing resentment and dividing society (Murray, 2013).
Prior to the Poor Law Amendment Act there was the Elizabethan Poor Law 1601 which was more generous towards the poor. It was becoming
impossible for the government to sustain this law due to the growing costs. Statistics show that in 1802 the expenditure on poor relief was costing the
government ВЈ4,078,000, this figure continued to

The Aims and Principles of the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act...
The Aims and Principles of the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act
In the decades prior to the national reform of the Poor Law in 1834, the characterisations of the administration were of variety rather than uniformity.
The social and economic changes at this time produced many problems for those that were responsible for the social welfare. Many areas throughout
the country though found solutions to this problem within the legal frame–work of the Elizabethan Poor Law of 1597–1601.
In the initial stages the amendment act was set up to reduce the amount of poor rates that were being paid. In the first ten years of the amendment act
the amount of relief being paid was reduced to a national average of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The way to stop this from happening was to reduce the fifteen thousand parishes into six hundred Poor Law unions. There was a great willingness to
keep the poor in one place and so by 1843 there was one hundred and ninety seven thousand one hundred and seventy nine poor incarcerated into the
workhouses. The workhouses were often described as bastilles.
"I do not agree with those who say that every man must look after himself, and that intervention by the state, will be fatal to his self–reliance, his
foresight and his thriftГўв‚¬В¦. It is a mistake to suppose that thrift is caused only by fear; it springs from hope as well as fear. Where there is no
hope, be sure there will be no thrift". (Winston Churchill, Liberalism and the Social Problems, 1909, p. 209).
Many administrators were outraged at the idea of Central Government becoming involved in the Amendment Act because as far as they were
concerned the old system was more than sufficient for the needs of the poor. The Poor Law Guardians then set about obstructing the Poor Law
Amendment Act, as they thought it was an unnecessary addition to the current act. The worst of the activities to block this new act was in
Huddersfield in the West Riding of Yorkshire. (As was).
The Amendment Act was supposed to help the poor but instead all it did was alienate those

Essay about The Poor Law Amendment Act and Tackling Poverty
The Poor Law Amendment Act and Tackling Poverty
The Poor Law of 1601 was the first to codify the idea of the state to provide for the welfare of its citizens. It distinguished between the 'deserving' and
the 'undeserving' poor; relief was local and community controlled.1 The 1834 Poor Law Act Amendment Act was an amendment to the Act for the
relief of The English Poor Law of 1601.
The Speenhamland System
The Speenhamland System first saw light of day in 1795. It was introduced by the magistrates in the Berkshire village of Speenhamland in an effort to
relieve the extreme poverty, which existed and was adopted widely. It offered any one, or several forms of relief including:
(a) Allowances to supplement earned wages.
(b) ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It was a direct violation of the poor person's right to pursue the principle of pleasure; to exercise mans' right to freedom and liberty. The Act was too
narrow and far too severe in its remedies. Unlike the more humane Speenhamland System the New Poor Law was inflexible and could not adapt to
differing situations. The most devastating remedy was that of the Poor Houses, which were atrocious hellholes.
The Poor Law failed to represent the expectations of the poor community, when most members of the Victorian working classes were likely to be in
poverty at some point in their lives. It was accepted that poverty was a natural part of the circle of their lives because of the fluctuations of the
environment that had a direct effect on the majority of employment available. Prior to the New Poor Law, relief was seen as an expected right, when
unemployed, to keep the able–bodied person fit and well and able to resume expected work when trade resumed.
Victorian Class Structure
The belief systems of the classes need to be examined to explain some of the principles behind the New Poor Law Act.
The Gentry, (Upper Class) usually by right of birth, the upper crust of society owned a large proportion of the lands, held powerful positions within

government and were rich. A central belief system that this is their rightful place in society, to pursue and enjoy the pleasures of life, including
education and materials. To

Essay about Poor Law
1.Explain why the New Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) was so controversial.
There were many arguments raised about the poor law amendment act of 1834, this Act was thought to be the most contentious piece of legislation
passed during the era of the Whig's. At the time, it was a lot about saving money, the upper class did not want to pay towards thepoor law, as they
believed they were lazy and unworthy. The taxpayers, and ratepayers believed it to be wrong they should be paying to help the poor. Theworkhouse
system was one of the most inhumane of all time, humiliating and demeaning all the poor people that entered it. When families' entered the workhouse,
the husband, wife, and children would be separated from each other, allowing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some individuals wanted reform for the use of child labour, trying to get less working hours with an age limit. Seebohm Rowntree, and Charles
Booth also called for reform for these poor people, as they were appalled at the atrocious working conditions of these factories, mills, and mines.
The individuals, and groups, who fought for these reforms, worked endlessly for many years to achieve a safe environment for these poor people.
The owners of these factories and mills had to realise, they could still make a profit, without jeopardizing the lives of the workers through their
neglect. Politicians also knew they had to have reform in the factories, with Germany having a much healthier workforce and better working
conditions, their production was much higher than ours. They needed educated, healthy workers to get the same standard of work Germany was
producing. The first effective, piece of factory legislation was the Factory Act of 1833. These applied to all textile mills, except those making silk and
lace;
В·No child under nine could be employed.
В·Children from nine to thirteen were limited to an eight–hour day, and were to receive at least two hours of education a day.
В·Young people from fourteen to eighteen were limited to a twelve hour– day, to be worked between 5.30 a.m. and 8.30 p.m.
В·Four inspectors were appointed at an annual

Elizabethan Poor Law Essay
The Elizabethan Poor Law was passed in 1601. This law enforced all church communities to annually on Easter select a couple of head supervisors
over the indigent. They were not compensated for their time. Usually those chosen did not want the position but they were supervised making sure that
they were doing the work. This law helped keep order during that era and reduced the beggars and poverty–stricken in the streets. There were two
kinds of help the outdoor and indoor help. The outdoor help meant that if the needy still had their place of residence then they could acquire some cash
or obtain needed clothing or food. Outdoor help was most commonly used during these times. Indoor help was when a family was taken to a
community almshouse. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They were fighting for equality and were now getting jobs that at one time they would not have ever considered. Discrimination is still around but
not as bad as it was in the past. Hopefully one day it will be completely abolished. The poor today of all races and genders have a lot of programs
available for them. Today when someone needs help they need to take the steps to improve their situation. Things happen that you can not control. It
is great to know that their are people willing to listen and understand what an individual may going through. I myself have needed to take advantage
of these programs in the past. Today I have no need for them. When I did they were a tremendous help. It is good to know that they are their if a
family member, friend, or myself need them in the

Is St. Anthony Poor And Poor
You can be can be rich but impoverished, or destitute but wealthy. In the Catcher in the Rye, Holden Caulfield has lived in a rich, yet small, setting
for his whole life, without much experience of the outside world. The people who I saw at St. Anthony's however, were very poor and needy, but
not necessarily impoverished socially or intellectually. Holden comes from a wealthy background, but is scarce on common sense, confidence,
strength, and social skills. Almost all of the people at St. Anthony's had a friend or somebody to talk to and appeared to be enjoying themselves,
even though they were at a rock bottom point in their lives. Holden Caulfield was a teenage boy who came from a wealthy, New York family. For all
his life, Holden had attended fancy and extravagant private boarding schools, and had everything rather handed to him. Holden had only gone to, and
had only ever known private school, therefore he was never exposed to anybody living in... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Anthony's, it is easy to feel superior to the people that are there, and make assumptions about what kind of people they are. What I learned when I
first went to St. Anthony's, is that almost all of the people who go there are all destitute in terms of money, but most of them are not impoverished
socially or intellectually. Many of the people there have a friend or friends, and somebody to talk to and spend time with. However, St. Anthony's is
a great place for people to break out from their own small world, and get exposed to many different people, from different walks of life. It is a place
for people, rich and poor, to come together, to volunteer, eat, and come out of their comfort zone, and spend quality time with each other. St. Anthony's
has changed my own perspective on homelessness, poverty, and certain neighborhoods, and it was great experience to share with my peers. It brought
me out of my own comfort zone, and taught me more about

Working Poor Essay
The Struggle of the Working Poor
Revised Essay
Sociology 113
Yvonne Barney
October 19, 2012
The Struggle of the Working Poor
Society often describes the impoverished with one word, lazy. Society has taught us that if a person wants to be financially successful, it is a simple
process of education and hard work that will equate to a successful income. This is the American dream. If the impoverished simply would get a job
instead of being lazy, they would not need to rely on programs like welfare. The impoverished would succeed if they only would apply themselves.
However, in an attempt to present another point of view, TheWorking Poor Invisible in America by David K. Shipler (2004) explored multiple
variables this group struggles ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Chapter 9, "Dreams," begins with the ambitious professional aspirations of sixth and eighth grade children from poor families in Washington, DC.
Shipler contrasts these aspirations with the enormous faced problems beyond their control. Chapter 10, "Work Works," is dedicated to the positive
impact that job training and working has had on some poor individuals and families. Job training programs that teach soft skills as well as hard skills
and are successful in instilling confidence and self–esteem are appreciated by employers. Chapter 11, "Skill and Will," emphasizes that American
society must understand what it can do using the skills and resources it has to combat poverty. The approach to remedying poverty, Shipler argues, must
be holistic, tackling all problems associated with it at once.
The United States is often described as a place where anyone can "pick themselves up by their bootstraps" and realize the American dream of a
comfortable lifestyle. But, for over 30 million Americans, this dream is no longer possible. Though we live in the richest and most powerful country
in the world, there are many individuals who are living under or at the poverty level. "While the United States has enjoyed unprecedented affluence,
low–wage employees have been testing the American doctrine that hard work cures poverty" (Shipler, 2004). The status of poverty translates

Poor Relief In The 19th Century
Introduction:
In British and Irish history, the term 'poor relief' is referred to the government and ecclesiastical action to alleviate poverty. Throughout the centuries
various authorities have needed to decide whose poverty deserves relief and also who should finance the cost of helping the destitute. With changing
attitudes towards poverty over the years, many methods have been attempted to solve the problem. Since the early 16th century legislation on poverty
enacted by the English Parliament, poor relief has developed from being little more than an organised means of punishment into a compassionate
government–funded approach providing support and protection, especially following the creation in the 1940s of the welfare state.
In this essay I plan to discuss the rationale underpinning the provision of poor relief in the 19th ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This was because the rising costs of social welfare provision became a considerable amount and there was a spreading disincentive to work as the relief
provided was usually better than some jobs' salaries. Also, providing relief to the able–bodied poor had pauperised a large section of the population.
The term 'pauper' comes from this era, describing a person who seeks welfare from the state. There was a system of indoor and outdoor relief. Indoor
relief, by means of entering the workhouse to receive relief, and outdoor relief, without entering the workhouse. For obvious reasons which will be
stated in this essay, outdoor relief was the preferred of the two.
The law faced the dilemma of how to provide to the poor without encouraging their dependency of the state. Later referred to as the 'New Poor Law', it
had different guiding principles to that of past poor laws. The new law stopped providing relief for the able–bodied poor except by offering them
employment in the workhouse (indoor relief), purely with the objective of stimulating workers to seek regular employment rather than

The Elizabeth Poor Law
Elizabeth Poor Laws: Why were they so important in the development of social welfare in North America?: The Elizabeth Poor Law advocated and
placed responsibility of the poor to the churches and government. If parishes could not meet the responsibilities, counties were required to assume
relief–giving functions. The government became the chief enforcer of poor relief. However, the local parishes fulfilled their welfare responsibilities in
several ways. They provided outdoor relief to persons in the homes; provided indoor relief to person in special institutions that came to be variously
known as almshouse, poorhouses or workhouses; or required person to become indenture servants or apprentices. It also required relatives to care ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Like England , North America had to create a social welfare system that would benefit all immigrants and citizens. North America today has
welcomed millions of immigrants from different cultures and political views. Tylor, said that culture is "that complex whole which includes
knowledge, belief, art, law, morals, custom, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man and woman as a member of society." Without a
social welfare act, it would be impossible to function in a society that embraces so many cultures with different political and social beliefs. It is
unrealistic to believe that North America is, or was equipped and prepared to provide financial support, employment, health care, education and other
types of support with equal distributions to society as a whole. The Elizabethethan Poor Laws, puts emphasis on the group of people who cannot protect
or provide for themselves. North America imitates, The Elizabethan Poor Law, as North America had to develop a social welfare system that would
acknowledge that North America, does not have equal distribution of wealth. For example, North American had to create the TANF program to assist
those who are poor and cannot work, and have no money to take care of their families. Families who receive fund through TANF program are consider
to be very poor families who need cash assistance in order to maintain support themselves and their families.

Poor Richards Almanac Essay
First published by Benjamin Franklin in 1732, "Poor Richard's Almanack" was a guide to both weather forecasts and wise sayings. Franklin used the
pseudonym Richard Saunders in writing the text, which became an annual publication up until 1757. Response to the almanac was tremendous, and it
sold as many as 10,000 issues a year. Second only to the bible, "Poor Richard's Almanack" was one of the most popular and purchased publications in
colonial America. The almanac stressed the two qualities Franklin found to be essential to success, industry and frugality. Benjamin Franklin wrote this
in hope of having a positive effect on the colonies.
Franklin wrote "Poor Richard's Almanack" as ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Overall, these sayings changed many of the colonist's lives, and made them think about how they were conducting their lives.
Besides its many proverbs, the almanac contained forecasts for weather in the colonies. These forecasts were based on the different weather patterns
that Franklin predicted, and because they were only predicted, they were not always accurate (Giblin 26). The forecasts proved to be very helpful to
the farmers and plantation workers when determining the kind of seasons the crops would have. Weather played a very important role in the lives of
the early colonists, and the almanac provided a means for people to arrange their lives according to these weather forecasts. Although not the most
important part of the almanac, the colonists were always discussing the accuracy or imprecision of Franklin's predictions.
In conclusion, by writing and publishing "Poor Richard's Almanack," Benjamin Franklin made an enormous contribution to the American public. It
provided informatio0n on many topics that people had not addresses publicly ever before. It also predicted the weather forecast, which was very
helpful for many of

Being Poor By Barbara Ehrenreich Analysis

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Tia Richardson

More from Tia Richardson (12)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Being Poor By Barbara Ehrenreich Analysis