3. • Carbon steel - stainless steel - NiTi
• First produced by Kerr manufacturing company in early 1900s, hence the
name K-files
• DESIGN ELEMENTS:
• K-file and Ni-Ti rotary instruments follow certain design principles that
relate to drills and reamers used for work in wood and metals .
• Design elements such as tip, flutes and cross sections are considered
relevant for files and reamers used in rotary motions.
4. • Tip designs:
• 2 main functions:
i. guide the file into the canal
ii. aid the file to penetrate deeper into the canal
• The cutting ability of the file tip:
i. angle and radius to its leading edge
ii. proximity of the flute to its actual tip end
Note: Tip design effects - file control, efficiency and outcome in shaping of
the rcs
• Instrument tips have been classified as:
i. cutting
ii. non cutting (batt tips) - eg Ni -Ti rotary files
iii. partially cutting
5. • Longitudinal and cross sectional design:
• Helical angle: The angle formed by the
cutting edge with the long axis of the file.
• Rake angle: The angle formed by the
leading edge through the Point of contact
with the radicular wall.
Ø If 90 degrees= neutral
Ø -VE = Scraping
Ø +VE= cutting
6. • Cutting angle: Formed by the leading edge of the file and a tangent to the
radicular wall in the point of contact.
• Clearance angle: Corresponds to the cutting angle at the trailing edge of the
file. (Reciprocating action becomes cutting angle)
• The sum of cutting angle and rake angle is 90 degrees.
• Pitch: Distance b/w a point on the leading edge and the corresponding point
on the adjacent leading edge.
Ø K-files: constant pitch, Ni-Ti rotary files: variable pitch
• Taper: The amount the file diameter increases each mm along its working
surface from the tip towards the file handle, can be constant or variable.
10. BROACHES:
• 2 Types:
• Smooth
• Barbed (ADA sp No. 6)
• They are manufactured by cutting sharp,
coronally angulated barbs into metal wire
blanks.
• Produced in a variety of sizes and color codes.
• Uses:
1. to remove vital pulp from root canals,
2. and in cases of mild inflammation, they work
well for severing pulp at the constriction level
in toto.
3. for removing materials (e.g., cotton pellets)
from canals.
19. K-FLEX FILES:
• Manufactured by Kerr in 1982
• Since the square blanks decreased
the instrument flexibilty, hence K-
files came in with a rhomboidal
cross section.
• Two acute angles- increased
sharpness and cutting efficiency
• Two obtuse angles- more space for
debris removal
• Used in filing motion.
21. TRIPLE FLEX FILES
• Made of stainless steel
• Triangular in cross section
• More flutes than reamers but lesser
than K-files
22. FLEX-R-FILES / ROANE FILES
• Made by removing the sharp
cutting edges from the tip of the
instrument
• This design reduces the ledge
formation, canal transportation and
other procedural accidents when
used in balance force technique
• Triangular in cross section
• They are made up of Ni-Ti
• Cut in counter clockwise rotary
motion
23. HEDSTRÖM FILES
• H-files have flutes which resembles successively
triangles set one on another.
• They are made by cutting the spiral grooves into
round , tapered steel wire in the same manner
as wood screws are made.
• This makes it efficient only for transational
strokes as the edges face the handle of the
instrument
• Rotational working movements are strongly
discouraged because of the possibility of
fracture.
• H files have positive rake angle
24. • Uses:
1. Hedström files up to size #25 can be efficiently used to relocate canal
orifices and, with adequate filing strokes, to remove overhangs.
2. Similarly, wide oval canals can be instrumented with Hedström files
as well as with rotary instruments.
• On the other hand, overzealous filing can lead to considerable thinning
of the radicular wall ands strip perforations
• As with stainless steel K-files, Hedström files should be single-use
instruments.
25. ADVANTAGES
• Better cutting efficiency
• Push debris coronally
DISADVANTAGES
• Lacks flexibility
• Tend to fracture
• Aggressive cutter
Safety Head storm files: This file has non cutting
safety side along the length of the blade which
reduces the chances of perforation.
The non cutting side is directed to the side of canal
where cutting is not required.
26. S FILES:
• Called S-Files because of its
cross sectional shape
• Produced by grinding which
makes it stiffer than H-files
• Designed by two spirals for
cutting blades forming double
helix design.
• Good cutting efficiency in either
filling or reaming action, thus
these files can also be classified
as Hybrid design.
32. FLEXOGATES
• Modified GG
• Made up of NiTi and have non cutting tip
• More flexible and used for apical
preparation
• Can be rotated continuously in a
handpiece through 360 degree.
• Advantages:
i. Increased debris removal
ii. Smoother and faster canal preparation
iii. Less fatigue to clinician
iv. Fexible, hence used in curved canals.
33. PEESO REAMERS
• They are manufactured from stainless steel by
milling similar to GG drills
• They are used mainly for post space preparation
• They have safe-ended non cutting tip
• Tip diameter varies from 0.7 to 1.7 mm( size 1 to 6)
• Rotational speed - 800 to 1200 rpm
• Cutting flutes are more parallel and longer
compared to GG but shorter than the 16 mm ISO-
normed hand files.
35. NICKEL-TITANIUM ROTARY INSTRUMENTS
• Ni-Ti alloy allows the instruments to flex more than SS instruments
before exceeding their elastic limit, thus reducing the procedural
errors.
• Ni-Ti was developed by Buchler
• Also known as NiTinol
• First use of NiTi in endodontics was reported in 1988 by Wallia et al
when a 15 number NiTi file was made from orthodontic wire.
36. ADVANTAGES
• Shape memory
• Super elasticity
• Low modulus of
elasticity
• Good resiliency
• Corrosion resistance
• Softer than SS
DISADVANTAGES
• Poor cutting efficiency
• Donot show signs of
fatigue before their
fracture
• Poor resistance to
fracture as compared to
ss
Unlike the K-files, which are manufactured by twisting, NiTi files have
to be grounded for their manufacturing because of the presence of
super elasticity and shape memory.
37. CLASSIFICATION:
Older Classification (Cohen 9th and 10th ed)
• Three design groups :
1. group I, the LightSpeed;
2. group II, rotary instruments with #.04 and #.06 tapers, which includes the
ProFile and many other models;
3. and group III, rotary instruments with specific design changes, such as the
ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer) and RaCe (FKG, La Chaux-de-Fonds,
Switzerland).
39. GROUP 1:
• Passive preparation (reaming action rather than cutting dentine)
• Presence of radial lands
• The first commercially available system was Profile (Dentsply Tulsa),
Light speed and GT Rotaries and have radial land which are common in
cross section.
• These are created by three round excavations, also known as U shape.
• The design of the instrument tip and also the lateral file surface (radial
land) guides the file as it progresses apically.
40. LIGHT SPEED INSTRUMENTS:
• Developed by Dr. Steve Senia and Dr. William Wildey in the early
1990s
• Also known as LS1, was introduced as an instrument different
from all others because of its long, thin, noncutting shaft and 0.25
to 2 mm anterior cutting part.
• The currently available LSX instruments (Sybron Endo) follows the
same design but is manufactured not by milling but by stamping
process.
• A full set of LS1 consists of 25 instruments in sizes #20 to #100,
including half sizes (e.g., 22.5, 27.5 , 32.5).
• Half size are color coded as full ones with the only difference that
half size has white or black rings on their handles.
• LSX doesnt have half sizes and a set cosists of instruments in sizes
#20 to #80
41. • Cutting heads of light speed systems had 3 different geometric shapes:
i. size 20-30 - short non cutting tips at 75 degree cutting angle.
ii. Size 32.5 - longer non cutting tip at 33 degree cutting angle
iii. size 35- 100 - longer, non cutting tip with 21 degree cutting angle
• Cutting heads basically have 3 radial lands with spiral shaped grooves in
between.
• The recommended working speed for LightSpeed instruments is 1500 to
2000 rpm, and they should be used with minimal torque.
• Because of the relatively thin non cutting shaft, LightSpeed instruments
are considerably more flexible than any other instrument in the market.
44. PRO-FILE
• Introduced by Dr. Ben Johnson in 1994.
• In contrast to the LightSpeed, with its thin, flexible shaft, the
ProFile has an increased taper compared with conventional
hand instruments.
• The ProFile first was sold as a series of 29 hand instruments in
#.02 taper, but it soon became available in #.04 and #.06
conicity.
• The tips of the ProFile Series 29 rotary instruments (Dentsply–
Tulsa) had a constant proportion of diameter increments (29%).
47. • Comparative assessment in vitro suggested that Pro file
prepared mesial canals in mandibular molars with less
transportation than K3 and RaCe
• A more recent addition to the profile family of instruments was
Vortex
• The major change lies in the non landed cross section whereas
tip sizes and tapers are similar to pre existing profiles , hence
these files are placed in Group 2
48.
49. GT & GTX FILES
• The Greater Taper file, or GT file was introduced by Dr. Steve Buchanan in 1994.
• This instrument also incorporates the U-file design and was marketed as Profile
GT
• The GT system was first produced as a set of four hand-operated files and later
as engine-driven files.
• The instruments came in four tapers (#.06, #.08, #.10, and #.12), and the
maximum diameter of the working part was 1 mm.
• This decreased the length of the cutting flutes and increased the taper.
• The instruments had a variable pitch and an increasing number of flutes in
progression to the tip; the apical instrument diameter was 0.2 mm.
• Instrument tips were non cutting and rounded.
53. K3
• In a sequence of design development by their inventor, Dr.
McSpadden, the Quantec 2000 files were followed by the Quantec SC,
the Quantec LX, and the current K3 system (all by SybronEndo ).
• The overall design of the K3 is similar to that of the ProFile, in that it
includes size #.02, #.04, and #.06 instruments.
• The most obvious difference between the Quantec and K3 models is
the K3’s unique cross-sectional design : a slightly positive rake angle
for greater cutting efficiency, wide radial lands, and a peripheral blade
relief for reduced friction.
57. GROUP 2:
• Active cutting flute design
• Triangular cross section
• Radial lands are absent- hence more cutting efficacy
• This translates to a higher potential of preparation errors
60. Sx
• No identification ring on its gold
colored handle
• Shorter length of 19 mm
• D0 = 0.19 mm, D14 = 1.2mm
• There is increase in taper up to D9
and then taper drops off up to D14
which increases its flexibility
• Use is similar to GG drills or orifice
shapers
S1
• Has purple identification ring on its
handle
• D0 is 0.185, D 14 is 1.20 mm
• Used to prepare coronal part
62. F2
• Red identification ring on
handle
• D0 diameter and taper is 25 and
0.08
• F3
• Blue colored ring on handle
• D0 diameter and taper is 30
and 0.09
• Each instrument has
decreasing percentage of
taper from D4 to D14
• This improves flexibility and
decreases the potential for
taper lock.
• The set is now complemented by 2 larger finishing
files F4 & F5
• F4 & F5 files have a tip diameter of 0.4 and 0.5 mm
respectively and tapers of 0.05 and 0.04 respectively.
66. HERO 642, HERO SHAPER
• First-generation rotary systems had neutral or slightly negative
rake angles, while Second-generation systems were designed with
positive rake angles, which gave them greater cutting efficiency.
• HERO instruments (MicroMega, Besançon, France) are an
example of a second-generation system.
• Cross sections of a HERO instrument show geometries similar to
those of an H-file without radial lands
• Tapers of #.02, #.04, and #.06 are available in sizes ranging from
#20 to #45.
• The instruments are coded by handle color.
72. FLEX MASTER (VDW DENTAL)
• Working length 21, 25, 31 mm and working part 16 mm
• It also features #.02, #.04, and #.06 tapers
Ø .04 and .06 used for crown-down phase
Ø .02 for safe apical enlargement
• FlexMaster Intro File
Ø For fast conical enlargement of the root canal orifice.
Ø 11 % taper
Ø 19 mm working length, 9 mm active working part
Ø ISO size 22 at the tip
77. RACE, BIORACE AND BT RACE
• The RaCe was manufactured since 1999 by FKG and was later distributed in the
United States by Brasseler (Savannah, GA)
• The name, which stands for reamer with alternating cutting edges, describes
just one design feature of this instrument
• Light microscopic imaging of the file shows twisted areas (a feature of
conventional files) alternating with straight areas; this design reduces the
tendency to screw into the root canal
• Cross sections are triangular or square
• The surface quality of the RaCe has been improved by electropolishing, and the
two largest files (size #35, #.08 taper and size #40, #.10 taper) are also available
in stainless steel
84. TWISTED FILES:
• Sybron Endo in 2008 presented the first fluted NiTi files by plastic
deformation, a process similar to twisting process that is used to
produce ss K- files; the Twisted files.
• First and only file to employ unique and proprietary production
technology that achieves unrivalled strength combined with flexibility.
• A thermal process allows twisting during a phase transformation into
the so called R-Phase of NiTi.
• R-Phase thermal treatment technology optimises the properties of NiTi
files to give 70 % more flexibility and 2-3 times more resistance to cyclic
fatigue than any other rotating file.
86. PROFILE VORTEX
• They are manufactured froM NiTi
• Two versions are available in the
market:
i. M-wire
ii. Blue wire (Vortex Blue)- greater
fatigue and torque resistance
• They have varying helical angles to
counteract the tendency of non
landed files to thread into the canal.
• Recommended speed: 500 rpm
• Available in sizes #15 to #50 and in
0.04 and 0.06 tapers
87. MTWO
• Originally sold in Itlay by Sweden e Martina in 2004
• The instrument has a two-fluted, S shaped cross section.
• The original strategy allowed for 3 distinct shaping approaches after the use
of a basic sequence with tip sizes from #10 to #25 and tapers from 0.04 to
0.06.
• MTWO is a well researched and cutting efficient instrument
• Clinically it is an example for the so called single length technique.
88.
89. GROUP III- SPECIAL CASES
• WaveOne, Reciproc
• Self Adjusting Files
• Endo-Eze
• Sonic and Ultra sonic instruments
95. • Non cutting tip
• Made of M-Wire technology
• RECIPROC® instruments have
radiograph visible depth markings
at 18, 19, 20 and 22 mm.
• Instrument length: 21 mm, depth
markings at: 18,19 and 20 mm
• Instrument length: 25 mm, depth
markings at: 18,19,20 and 22 mm
• Instrument length: 31 mm, depth
markings at: 18,19,20,22 and 24
mm
96. • Both instruments feature variable tapers that are largest towards
the tip.
• Reciproc is a two fluted file with a design similar to MTwo.
• Special motors are used for both systems to provide reciprocation
actions, with alternating counter clockwise and clockwise rotations
of 150 to 170 and 30 to 50 degrees respectively.
• Both files are machined with left leaning flutes (cutting direction-
clockwise)
99. • Manufactured by Redent- Nova
• The file is really a cylinderical, hollow device designed as a thin
walled Ni-Ti lattice with a light abrasive surface
• Initial glide path is established with 20 K file to allow the insertion
of SAF files
• The file is compressed from its 1.5 mm diameter into dimensions
equivalent to those of #25 K-file
• Operated with a handpiece that generates in and out vibrations
(4000/min) and 0.4 mm amplitude
108. XP- ENDO SHAPER
• Two technologies combined
• The XP-endo Shaper is the latest addition to the XP-endo
ranges.
• It is a combination of two cutting-edge technologies:
• Made with MaxWire® alloy, like the XP-endo Finisher, it
offers remarkable flexibility and fatigue resistance, and
the ability to progress within the canals with ease and
agility, expanding or contracting according to the canal
morphology.
• With an initial taper of .01, the XP-endo Shaper expands
once inside the canal, achieving a taper of at least .04.
111. XP ENDO FINISHER
• Because of its small core size – ISO 25 in diameter –
and its zero taper, XP-endo Finisher benefits from
incredible flexibility and shows unparalleled
resistance to cyclic fatigue. In addition the file will
contact and clean the dentine but NOT change the
original shape of the canal
• ISO 25
• Taper: 0%
• Lengths: 21, 25, 31 mm
• Optimal speed: 1'000 rpm (minimum 800 rpm)
• Torque: 1 Ncm
• Delivered in a sterile blister. Single use
112. TRUSHAPE FILES
• 3D Conforming Files by Dentsply Sirona.
• The key to the TruShape difference lies in the
file’s unique S-shape design, allowing it to
conform to areas of the canal larger than the
nominal file size.
• As a result, TruShape 3D Conforming Files
allows to preserve more dentinal structure
while removing pulp and debris along the
entire root canal.
• Contact up to 75% of walls along the entire
canal.
• Create a predictable apical shape with up to
32% less transportation.
• Remove up to 36% less dentin with superior
overall shaping.
115. GENTLEFILE ROTARY FILE SYSTEM
• Ultra Flexible
• Shapes by Filing
• Operates at 6,500 rpm
• Taper 3% - 4% (preserve natural tooth
anatomy)
• Patent Design: File made of 3 medical
grade stainless wires
• The upper file section is made of a 3-
layer structure that provides the vertical
force required for efficient file
progression in the canal
• The apical file section is a bi-layer
structure with greater flexibility for
shaping extremely curved canals
118. • The innovation: the instrument presents a
variable cross-section along the blade.
• One Shape principle: 3 different cross-section
zones.
• The first zone presents a variable 3-cutting-edge
design.
• The second, prior to the transition, has a cross-
section that progressively changes from 3 to 2
cutting edges.
• The last (coronal) is provided with 2 cutting
edges
• One Shape‘s flexibility assures a perfect respect
to the original canal path and curvature.
• The variable pitch of One Shape® reduces
instrument screwing effects.
• ABC (Anti Breakage Control) is a safety bonus:
the instrument will unwind to avoid separation.
120. 2 SHAPE
• By MicroMega
• 2Shape is a sequence with 2
shaping files in continuous
rotation which have been
heat-treated using the T•Wire
technology.
• The instruments’ flexibility
provides user comfort and an
outstanding negotiation of
curvatures. The instruments
return to their initial shape
after each use.