Switching To Nuclear Energy

Switching To Nuclear Energy
People who support nuclear energy argue that it is an efficient source of energy. This means that
energy can be produced quickly and people can use it when they need it. It makes enough energy to
provide people with their desired needs. These people also believe that it is easy to make the switch
to nuclear power. That it is easy to add power plants and switch to nuclear energy. People who agree
with nuclear energy believe that even though it takes carbon dioxide to create these power plants,
once they are running, they will cut down on CO2 emissions (1). It is very deceiving because at first
it appears like we would be eliminating the majority of fossil fuels that are being burned. However,
people don't realise that even though the factories ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Building enough power plants to provide the world with energy would mean increasing our CO2
production in the process of making them. Once the power plants are built, although they don't use
CO2 to produce energy, to keep the factories running and transport all of the waste releases more
CO2 (1). Switching to renewable energy would progress us further into stopping climate change. We
would be cutting down on CO2 emissions by a much greater amount. This would make a more
significant difference on the climate change (1). This shows that using renewables would make a
larger impact on the world and how to help save it. The Industry already has technology to switch to
100% renewables, they just don't want to let go of their nuclear technology (4). Another danger of
nuclear power is the risk of terrorism and violence. People are worried that if violent protesters
advance on nuclear technology, the amount of violences will increase. This is another reason to end
our nuclear technology knowledge while we can (1). Furthermore, not only do nuclear plants harm
the industry and economy, they also harm the people and the environment. The evidence is showing
that being around nuclear radioactivity causes people to have cancer. Not only does the radiation
cause people to have cancer, but it also damages their DNA. Additionally, it harms the environment,
not just humans. Animal's are affected in several different forms. Some examples are, Diarrhea,
vomiting, internal bleeding, anemia, exhaustion, permanent sterilization and death
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Nuclear Technology And Its Impact On The Atomic Age
On August 6th and 9th, 1945 the first atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Japan. With the use of these new weapons a door was opened that could never be closed, a new and
uncertain era was now upon the world, and the use of atomic power could mean the betterment or
destruction of a nation at a moment's notice. Whether you like it or not, you live in the atomic age
and it can have many implications that you may or may not know about. The Manhattan Project is
well known to have developed the first two atomic bombs, fat man, and little boy, but nuclear
technology was being researched many years before this. Uranium was first found in 1789 by
Martin Klaproth, and was discovered to have ionizing radiation in 1895 by Wilhelm Rontgen
(Outline History of Nuclear Energy). More and more information on uranium and other materials
were being discovered, such as: radioactive materials emitting alpha particles in 1896 by Henri
Becquerel, in 1902 the discovery of radiation being a spontaneous event by Ernest Rutherford, Niels
Bohr and his increased understanding of the atom, in 1932 when James Chadwick discovered the
neutron, etc. Other nations also spent resources on developing nuclear technology such as in Russia
with their Radium Institute of Leningrad FTI, but was hampered with Stalin's purges that eliminated
prominent scientists working there; British scientists developed the concept of the atomic bomb with
the MAUD committee in 1940 and continued research on the

Nuclear Power Is Too Dangerous and Should Be Phased Out Essay
Just a few years ago there was a significant catastrophic nuclear failure. This failure caused huge
amounts of radioactive materials to be released into the environment. The Fukushima Daiichi
nuclear disaster quickly became the largest nuclear incident since the 1986 Chernobyl accident
while both have affected the environment immensely with radiation. Due to the potential safety
issues, the risk to the environment, and the dangers of nuclear power, the use of nuclear facilities
must be called off to prevent meltdowns and irreparable damage to the surrounding area.
One reason why nuclear power must be eliminated is due to the fact that it does not justify the
danger it creates. According to Malik Imran's blog entitled "Nuclear Power Not ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
. . .Despite [that advantage,] nuclear power generation has some disadvantages in [the] post
producing process. Radioactive waste can not be recycled and has to be kept under strict repository
until its half–life ends its radioactivity.
Even though nuclear energy makes more electricity, the cost of storing dangerous radioactive waste
for the number of years it takes for it to reach its half–life is preposterous. In short it is clear that
nuclear energy produces more energy, but more does not mean that it is an efficient energy
production process or delivery system. Another reason why nuclear power needs to be eliminated is
because it is too dangerous considering the threat of short term potential for meltdowns. According
to "Chernobyl Accident 1986" as published on the World Nuclear Association website, "The April
1986 disaster at the Chernobyl power plant in Ukraine was the product of a flawed Soviet reactor
design coupled with serious mistakes made by the plant operators [and] was a direct consequence of
Cold War isolation and the resulting lack of any safety. . . .[Though] it led to major changes in safety
culture and in industry cooperation[s]." Even though the Chernobyl accident has inspired safety
changes, the risk of meltdowns are still too high to continue the use of nuclear energy. More
evidence shows the dangers created by nuclear power plants due to meltdowns caused by accidents.
"Chernobyl Accident 1986"

Nuclear Power: Chernobyl, Fukushima And Three Mile Island
Why Nuclear Power should be banned
Chernobyl, Fukushima and Three Mile Island – all known as major nuclear power disasters. Nuclear
power might be a good source of power, but in the long run it can be a real hazard and should be
banned. If we rely on nuclear power to be our primary power source, it will cause major problems to
humans and the environment. Nuclear power is hard to dispose of, expensive to run, and the reactors
can easily be disrupted and cause the release of massive amounts of radiation.
Firstly, nuclear waste is hard to dispose of. Unlike other power sources, nuclear waste is still not
known about how to dispose of. This is a problem because the waste emits radiation, which can leak
into the environment. Chernobyl is

Human Migration : How Globalization Can Be Described? Essay
This process of human migration depicts how globalization can be described in many different
facets. Social and cultural globalism involves the spread of ideas, information, and images (Nye and
Donahue, 5). The individuals who carry these ideas, information, and images carry them to different
areas of the globe and thus spread new thoughts and creations. Technology can easily be involved
with social and cultural globalism, as many different areas create new technology and other
locations replicate them. Some sociologists know this process of essentially copying another
cultures ideas as "isomorphism" (Nye and Donahue, 5). Isomorphism is used in multiple aspects of
globalization but none more than technology. When different areas create new advanced technology,
there is no time wasted but other nations in trying to recreate said technology. Technological
globalization can be understood with more ease when the other facets of globalization are known,
and how they interact. Technology as one globalism does not act alone in shaping the growing
globalized world, it is partnered with each aspect mentioned before to create a world that is much
smaller than we know, even if not in a literal sense. Of course, while there are multiple different
forms of globalism that contribute to the globalization of the world, technology has its own
components that make it so unique. Literature Review: Technology and Globalization Social media
has shown to play a large role in the affect of

The Road By Cormac Mccarthy
"The Road" depicts a solemn and deteriorating environment that can no longer provide the
fundamentals to a society due to the nuclear disaster. The sudden depletion of the resources within
their environment made it difficult for the father and the son to find sustenance. They were
constantly traveling towards the South looking for safe places to situate themselves because the
father knew that they would not be able to survive the nuclear winter. The genre of the novel is
post–apocalyptic science fiction because it revolves around a dismantling society. Cormac
McCarthy's "The Road" depicts how environmental destruction finally gave sense for people to
value the world and what it had to offer.
Environmental destruction irrevocably comes as a shock to human society, since people are so
dependent upon all the resources that nature provides them. "Ecosystem services are essential for
human life... They include provisions of clean water, and flood control, creation of soil, pollination
of crops, providing habitats for fisheries, and other benefits that underpin human well–being"(Daily
xviii). These assets provided by the environment help the world run with ease giving the father and
the son and their society the resources they needed until their terrain was contaminated by the
radioactivity due to the nuclear explosion. "The clock stopped at 1:17. A long shear of light and then
a series of low concussions... He went into the bathroom and threw the light switch but the power
was

The Chernobyl Meltdown
History of Nuclear Power plants has shown human society that it is unreliable and unpredictable.
Behrens and Rosen show the devastation that Chernobyl had on the human population after the large
scale meltdown. "Fukushima was the worst nuclear disaster since 1986, when the Chernobyl nuclear
power reactor in the Ukraine suffered a meltdown, eventually exposing over half a million cleanup
workers to toxic levels of radioactivity and releasing lesser levels of contamination over much of the
western USSR and Europe" (Behrens, Rosen 292). Chernobyl is a prime example of nuclear power
plant reactions when they have meltdowns and fail. Chernobyl was a severe case but it gives the
public a good idea of what happens when these power plants are not properly ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
"Now think about Japan, It suffered its worst earth quake in perhaps 1,100 years, followed by a
direct–hit tsunami on two nuclear plants" (Holman 294). Holman's belittlement of these events is not
some thing that should be shoved off like Holman wants the public to do. Even after many years of
clean up and careful watching, Chernobyl is still considered inhabitable by humans. "Hundreds of
miles around Chernobyl remain uninhabitable today" (Behrens, Rosen 292). This is one of the
largest draw backs to using Nuclear Power plants, is the long term effects it causes in the areas that
human society had thrived in. Learning from these large scale nuclear melt downs can help scientist
to try and create a nuclear power plant that will be able to avoid these meltdowns. Robinsons
explains in his article how there's always going to be that chance of a melt down. "We can engineer
nuclear power plants so that the chance of a Chernobyl–style disaster is almost nil. But we can't
eliminate it completely–nor can we envision every other kind of potential disaster" (Robinson

Nuclear Deterrence is the Best Defense Against Nuclear...
Nuclear Deterrence is the Best Defense Against Nuclear War
In 1945, a great technological innovation was dropped over Japan, the atomic bomb. Ever since the
bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the world has faced the threat of nuclear attack. In reaction to
this, world governments have been forced to find a defense against nuclear attack. One solution to
the danger of nuclear attack is the use of nuclear deterrence. Nuclear deterrence is the possession
and launching of nuclear weapons for the sole purpose of defense and retaliation against a nuclear
attack from another country. Nuclear deterrence is the best answer to the danger of nuclear war,
resulting in world security and the prevention of nuclear war. However, some people believe ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There is a huge expense in maintaining and building the nuclear arms that we use for deterrence.
Nuclear information is secret, taking great amounts of money and time, to research and keep it
confidential. Power is gained from the research and development, which is definitely worth the
expense. The great amounts of money spent on nuclear technology help ensure the security of the
people of the United States. It takes huge amounts of money to have the edge in nuclear technology.
However, nuclear deterrence is even cheaper than war. The cost of building, operating, and
maintaining nuclear weapons is only $26.7 billion per year (Hellman). "This is significantly less
than the cost of the 1991 [Persian Gulf] war, which came to nearly $80 billion" (Dobbs). Deterrence
is economically and politically intelligent.
The Cold War is over and some people believe that we do not need nuclear deterrence anymore. The
U.S.S.R has fallen and Russia poses little threat to launch a nuclear attack on the United States.
Because of this, Russia and the United States have begun disarming their nuclear weapons. The
United States has reduced its nuclear stockpile of warheads from 31,265 in 1965 to about 10,455 in
2002, enough to use for deterrence ("Table of . . . "). This disarming agreement is only between
these two countries and they will continue to keep a minimum number of these nuclear warheads to
deter other countries. They realize that they are not a threat to each other,

Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power Plant
It is no doubt that Nuclear is very powerful and that it can cause some good things to happen but we
can not ignore the horrible things that it has done to our planet and ecosystem. There are two sides
to this argument if we should close nuclear power plants or we shouldn't in my personal opinion I
think that we should close these plants. But before I had to make my decision I had to do some
research on both sides so here is what I found.
One of the pros of Nuclear power is that, if we use Nuclear Power then we will use Fossil Fuels a lot
less than we normally use them, and this would help stop the greenhouse gases from going into the
air. (CO2 and others.) Also, another good thing about Nuclear power is that it is low operation costs,
nuclear power produces very inexpensive electricity. Also, even though the expense of setting up
nuclear power plants is moderately high, the expense of running them is quite low. These Nuclear
plants can be shut down if other resources are to be very high and when they are not in high demand
then the Nuclear plant can be up and running again. But then again, Nuclear power gives us new
ways to defend ourselves for wars for the future since we have used it in the past. However, the
normal life of nuclear reactor is anywhere from 40–60 years, depending on how often it is used and
how it is being used. Even if we run out of Nuclear power then we might be able to still use the
fission reaction to make more reliable resources in the future

The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power Plants
It is no doubt that Nuclear is very powerful and that it can cause some good things to happen but we
can not ignore the horrible things that it has done to our planet and ecosystem. There are two sides
to this argument if we should close nuclear power plants or we shouldn't in my personal opinion I
think that we should close these plants. But before I had to make my decision I had to do some
research on both sides so here is what I found,
One of the pros of Nuclear power is that, if we use Nuclear Power then we will use Fossil Fuels a lot
less than we normally use them, and this would help stop the greenhouse gases from going into the
air. (CO2 and others.) Also another good thing about Nuclear power is that it is low operation costs,
nuclear power produces very inexpensive electricity. Also, even though the expense of setting up
nuclear power plants is moderately high, the expense of running them is quite low. These Nuclear
plants can be shut down if other resources are to be very high and when they are not in high demand
then the Nuclear plant can be up and running again. But then agian, Nuclear power gives us new
ways to defend ourselves for wars for the future since we have used it in the past. However the
normal life of nuclear reactor is anywhere from 40–60 years, depending on how often it is used and
how it is being used. Even if we run out of Nuclear power then we might be able to still use the
fission reaction to make more reliable resources in the

Crisis
Crisis
"Crisis!" Anytime we, as a society, hear this word our ears perk up and the speaker has our attention.
Usually when we hear crisis we think that it is something with "the distinct possibility of a highly
undesirable outcome" (Merriam Webster) that calls for immediate response. President George W.
Bush says that we are in a national "energy crisis" (Is Yucca Mountain in Nevada a safe disposal
site?). Bush has proposed a solution, storing all of our nation's nuclear waste in Nevada's Yucca
Mountain, but has been met with much resistance from Nevada residents and politicians and
environmental groups.
The proposal is that Yucca Mountain will be a "permanent disposal facility" for two types of nuclear
energy. Spent energy is from ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Lisa Gue, a policy analyst with Public Citizen says, "Yucca Mountain is an unsuitable site for an
unsuitable project."
Many of the environmentalists oppose Yucca Mountain because they believe that the waste could
contaminate our water supply. They believe that water could corrode the canisters and then the
United States would be confronting a catastrophe. However, a study, conducted by the DOE, found
that even if water would erode the canisters of waste, the waste would still have to pass through one
thousand feet of rock to contaminate an underground water supply. Obviously, this fifteen year
study, completed in 1998, greatly encouraged progression towards completion of Yucca Mountain.
Despite these findings, skeptics still believe that water could be contaminated and claim that
because the study was conducted by the DOE–which is pro–Yucca Mountain–that it should be
disregarded as biased.
The largest problem confronting Yucca Mountain is transporting the radioactive waste from
temporary storage sites. The waste would be transported by truck and train. Inevitably, accidents
would occur during this process. The DOE says that special shipping casks should prevent any
major impacts from any accidents. Critics, who have dubbed the Yucca Mountain plan "Mobile
Chernobyl," say that the combination of diesel fuel fires and radioactive waste could seriously
pollute our nation's

Atomic And Nuclear Bomb : Atomic Bomb
Atomic/Nuclear bomb The atomic bomb ended WWII when the United States dropped Fat Man and
Little Boy on the japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This is what started the arms race
known as the Cold War between the United States and Russia, the two major world superpowers left
after WWII. The effects of the massive arms race between the two countries still to this day affect
every citizen in the world due to the fact so many weapons of mass destruction were made some
were even lost. Along with this, come many groups such as ISIS and Al–Qaeda and even the country
of North Korea that seek to possess these bombs and or make their own to use for their own evil
intentions against the free world.The world has rested on the policy of M.A.D (mutual assured
destruction) for too long but with threat of suicidal extremists, this policy won't work any longer so
we must discard of our Metal Horsemen of the apocalypse and use nuclear energy for life instead of
death. In the twenty–first century the threat of nuclear war is still prominent but instead of the
U.S.S.R the threat is now centralized in the Middle East and North Korea. So instead of building
more bombs, as we did in the age of the red scare, we are now disarming them according to Sharon
Squassoni the Director and Senior Fellow of the Proliferation Prevention Program . But problems in
the middle east and with North Korea have caused us to keep a larger quantity on stand by. The
United States is taking preventative

Nuclear Power Shutdown: Is Nuclear Energy Safe?
Nuclear Power Shutdown
Nuclear power plants are one of the main ways to gather energy, but is it the best and safest way and
cleanest way to get energy? Abe gilbert says, "For now I will simply state that Nuclear Energy can
never be clean or safe. Look at the hundreds of thousands of cubic tons of nuclear waste that we
have no safe place to store."(Abe Gilbert 4).Nuclear power plants are not, despite of what other
people say, the cleanest and safest way to get energy. Nuclear plants are harmful to the environment,
are not as durable (long lasting) as other ways of getting energy, and they become potential targets
for terrorist who want to destroy the United States. People may argue that nuclear power plants are
clean and are safe, but are ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In an article called Nuclear Power states, "Unfortunately nuclear power is not renewable as it uses
radioactive 'heavy' metals such as uranium as its fuel which is not very abundant. . ." (William
Parker 1). Unlike other alternative ways to gather energy, nuclear energy is a way to gather energy
that doesn't last for very long. Lisa Zyga says in her article "Why nuclear power will never supply
the world's energy needs" that "at the current rate of uranium consumption with conventional
reactors, the world supply of viable uranium, which is the most common nuclear fuel, will last for
80 years. Scaling consumption up to 15 TW, the viable uranium supply will last for less than 5
years. (Viable uranium is the uranium that exists in a high enough ore concentration so that
extracting the ore is economically justified.)". Most nuclear power plants can create energy for about
five years, maybe less, until the plant is no longer a use to gather nuclear energy. This in terms
makes nuclear energy practically a lost cause. Nuclear power is not efficient and it is a very unstable
element to use. After most nuclear power plants are all used up, in a sense, the area around the plant
can no longer be used. Due to all the pollution a plant causes, the area surrounding the plant just
becomes a useless piece of land that is no longer benefiting

Persuasive Essay On Grand Canyons
The world is full of wonderful and amazing natural scenery, many of them located in the United
States. One of these is the Grand Canyon. Just imagine an amazing view, with a gorgeous desert and
mountainous landscape in the background. When you look down, there is an amazing canyon with a
river on the bottom and so breathtaking that it makes people feel like they could become an eagle
and just soar around this beautiful place. There are animals, birds, trees and so much beauty that it
could inspire anyone to do anything. It is one of the most awe–inspiring places I've ever been in and
would recommend it to all. But now imagine looking at this with a radioactive suit on, and looking
more like a wasteland. There are many dangers, mostly human produced, surrounding beautiful
places like this, and in the Grand Canyons case, one of these dangers is uranium mining. This
activity produces many health and environment hazards that could destroy one ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, there was a dam break in 1979 In New Mexico that released radioactive waste water in
to the Little Colorado River. There are four streams in the Grand Canyon park that are currently
suffering from contamination by the mining activity. In Utah, they are still trying to clean up one of
the nation's first mines in Moab and in Colorado, neighbors of a small community of Lincoln Park
have had to stop drinking well water because of contamination (Anna Aurilio et all 2).
Many groups and environmentalists have been fighting these mines and have had success and draw
backs. In a story provided by Warren Day and Jennifer Lavista, from the USGS, they state that the
Secretary of State in 2012 withdrew all federal lands from any uranium mining petitions to be able
to better study the effects for at least 20 years. While this was somewhat a victory, the setback was
that current opened mines could stay

Synthesis Essay: How To Survive A Nuclear Winter
Synthesis Essay – With the Cold Extremely frigid temperatures sweep through the air, carrying fear
alongside it. One might wonder what the peculiar occurrence is. It is a nuclear winter. From both the
story "Portable Phonograph" and the article "How to Survive a Nuclear Winter", it is explained how
one lives amidst a nuclear winter. During a nuclear winter, day to day life becomes a battle; it
becomes a matter of survival. To maintain any level of normality, one must delight themselves in a
form of art, for art is what brings people together, no matter the form. Life vanishes before their
eyes; everything dwindles into nothingness. The only evidence of life remaining are bewildered
faces. During a nuclear winter, there is an extreme drop ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The dangerous UV radiation forces you to wear sunglasses and thick layers of clothing. Wearing
thick clothing is also important, to prevent the stinging cold from making an entrance. For one to
stay safe from the dangerous surroundings, they must find a secluded place to make a home (a bomb
shelter is a good option).In this temporary home, one must be able to provide all the necessities
needed to survive. Food and water is one of the most essential items, along with matches/candles,
and blankets. One must prepare for the worst and ready themselves for any length of time. Along
with the bare necessities, one must carry a weapon of some kind. With any kind of disaster,
comes"widespread social disorder and chaos" (Roberts, 2007, p. 4). With all of the abnormal
behaviour, it is important to keep a level of sanity. People need human interaction, and one may go
crazy with a lack of socializing. A little bit of music or art will ensure that "[one] will have a little
soul left until [death]" (Clark, 1941, p. 179). In any form of disaster, the world shuts down and goes
into a panic, like a bee trapped under a glass. Art is a significant role in what brings people together
and conserves normality. In the midst of nuclear war, it is a difficult time for all, so keeping oneself
safe, while not hurting others, would be hoped for. It is important for human life to continue to its
best ability so everyone

When It Comes To Power, There Are A Lot Of Ways To Produce
When it comes to power, there are a lot of ways to produce it. Inventors are constantly looking for
new and more efficient ways to create power. Unfortunately, scientists found a powerful new way to
create energy but not intentionally for electrical fuel. In 1945, J. Robert Oppenheimer was part of
the team that created the very first atomic bomb made from Plutonium. The first nuclear power plant
was not created until 1954. Despite incidents such as Chernobyl, Fukushima, Three Mile Island
accident, and the SL–1 accident, the government claims that nuclear power plants cannot possibly
have a core meltdown. For years, groups of scientists, doctors, and nuclear specialists have been
trying to combat the growth and use of nuclear power plants ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Once weapons of such power have been introduced, it is impossible to be completely sure that there
are absolutely no nuclear weapons being built in preparation for an attack by a radical group.
Therefore, countries adopted nuclear power reactors in order to allow nuclear production in secret to
put the citizens of the world at ease. Regardless of their purpose, buildings with such dangerous
material should not be used because people who cannot control their situation get exposed against
their will. When it comes to radiation, there is not a safe level of exposure. Dr. Ira Helfand (2012)
includes part of a report from National Research Council BEIR VII that reads, "Any exposure,
including exposure to naturally occurring background radiation, creates an increased risk of cancer,"
(Helfand, 2012. Para. 2). There is no escaping radiation as there is always a naturally occurring level
of radiation but there is a way to limit how much radiation that people are exposed to. Radiation
adds up quickly and the adverse effects from it are horrendous. Dr. Ira Helfand explains his concern
for nuclear energy though his text, "If one person receives 1 rem of exposure... If the whole US
population is exposed to that dose, there will be 300,000 cases of cancer...the cumulative impact on
the whole community may be very significant," (Helfand, 2012. Para. 3). With the dangerous effects
of radiation being so widely spread, why

Essay on The Atomic Cafe
The Atomic Cafe The Atomic Cafe is a 1982 documentary film compiled of clips from government
propaganda, training films, news stories, advertisements and other media from the 1940's through
the 1950's. Many films were prepared by the U.S. government either for the military or for its
citizens to view. The form of Atomic Cafe was unique for documentaries. It was produced entirely
of different film sources edited together, without narration. The film made its points solely through
the selection and order of the clips included in the documentary. The purpose of the film was to
show the American people of the 1980's exactly how the government distributed propaganda and
deceived the American citizens of the 1950's. Atomic Cafe is a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The government knew that such actions and the "Duck and Cover" methods recommended in
schools would, in fact, provide absolutely no protection against exposure to fallout. The government
also promoted building a fallout shelter, stocked with supplies of canned goods, as a way to survive
atomic war. This was only a partial truth, since a shelter could protect from radiation, but not from
fire storms. The filmmakers' main ideas are that the government misled and lied to the people of the
U.S. so that they would believe that the atomic bomb would have no effect on their health and
security, that we should question if the government should have lied to the American people, and to
make us question whether or not the citizens of the U.S. would continue to be as naive as the people
of the 1950's. I do mostly agree with the filmmakers' thesis. It is obvious that the government was
lying and misleading the people of the U.S. regarding the ability to survive nuclear war. I don't think
that it was entirely right that the government lied to the U.S. people. I don't believe it was the
government's place or choice to withhold such important information. Citizens have a right to know,
but in cases, it's better for them to not know to prevent riots and episodes of mass hysteria. If the
citizens had known all the facts about the horrible consequences of a nuclear war, there might have
been more opposition to the continuing

Eng 102 Project Research Paper
My favorite ENG 102 project was how radioactive elements released into the Atlantic Ocean
affected marine life due to the Fukushima nuclear reactors. As much as I struggled with writing and
formatting my paper it was very rewarding none the less. Interesting enough I found who I was
when I was looking for research articles about the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. It was
privy to me that I was fascinated about the bazar techniques used to harness energy through nuclear
fusion and fission. When I began my voyage I believed that these technical details about nuclear
reactors was not something I was going to enjoy, but necessary for my report. I was wrong. I was
fascinated; I completely submerged myself in nuclear chemistry. I read papers

Waste Management : The Problem With Nuclear Waste
Nuclear waste The problem with nuclear waste is getting worse everyday while we try and find a
solution to dispose of the waste properly, however there are some people who think that the nuclear
waste project for waste disposal is not that serious and it does not have an affect on the environment,
but they are wrong because our lack of care for proper disposal of nuclear waste is having a tole on
the environment where the waste is buried and the life forms around these waste sites. Nuclear
waste needs a proper and safe place to be put in, because if you don't, you could put others lives in
danger and contaminate certain things, such as the water supplies or the plants that the wildlife
would have to eat for example, storing nuclear waste in the Yucca Mountain would be a bad idea
because the containers that they store nuclear waste in are known for corroding and leaking and
eventually getting into the water supply in the ground. The Yucca Mountain would not be a safe
place to store high level nuclear waste because the Yucca Mountain is an active volcano right now
and if an earthquake should happen, the toxins from the nuclear waste would contaminate the water
line in the ground. Nuclear waste is also bad because of the cost to keep it in safe and contained
areas. The nuclear business let's waste cool for a considerable length of time before blending it with
glass and putting away it in enormous cooled, solid structures. This waste must be kept up, observed
and

The Debate Over Nuclear Waste
It is established that energy cannot be created nor destroyed and it could not be made out of nothing
according the law of conservation of energy. The way that science explains the phenomenon of
energy conservation is by portraying the conservation of energy as a physical transfer of energy
between mediums through various forms such as heat, sound, and light. Since the discovery of fire
in the early days of humanity, it can be understood that heat is the most versatile form of energy. On
the expense of sacrificial physical matter, heat is produced particularly natural resource such as
fossil fuels. While time progresses, the anticipated rate of decrease in fossil fuels has lead to the
exploration of prospectively innovative long–term energy supplies. Nevertheless, like fossil fuels,
injurious resources have professed many questions regarding the discarding of nuclear waste. This
controversy paper will be mainly focusing on the question of whether nuclear waste can be disposed
of safely.
Contrasting on the issues with fossil fuels, the depletion of nuclear resources cannot tangibly be
consumed. Relatively when creating heat by utilizing fossil fuels, nuclear resources do not
breakdown into individual byproducts for example, carbon dioxide and water. In contrast, electrical
power plants use nuclear resources such as uranium and plutonium pellets. When these nuclear
resources are used, they remain undamaged and become considered as consumed fuel once it
reaches an industrial

How Does Nuclear Power Negatively Affected The World
Ever since the discovery of the nucleus of the atom in 1911, the world has been influenced
negatively by the atom ("May"). In every atom, in the center, in the nucleus, a certain number of
protons and neutrons make up the base, with electrons whizzing around it. If the nucleus of
certain atoms is split, a devastating explosion, incinerating everything within the vicinity, a blast
basically causing mass destruction will follow ("Nuclear Weapons Work"). Nuclear power, a
seemingly harmless way of making power, is another way nuclear energy is harming and has
harmed the world. It is expensive, hazardous, inconsistent, and bad for the environment (Buzz).
Two major disasters have occurred because of nuclear power plant malfunctions. The Chernobyl ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to a New York Times article published on June 30th a year after the attack, 4.7 square
miles of Hiroshima were destroyed, and 70,000 to 80,000 people were killed or missing. About
70,000 were injured as well ("Figures"). This is a very good example of how nuclear bombs have
negatively affected the world, as the city of Hiroshima is still recovering nearly 80 years later.
Three days after Little Boy was dropped on Hiroshima, Fat Man, (the name of the other atomic
bomb) was dropped over the city of Nagasaki, Japan. On an ordinary midsummer's day, at about
10:02, Fat Man was dropped. The city was very unsuspecting, and only about seven minutes
after the bomb was dropped, the alarm sounded, so just 400 people made it safely into the bomb
shelters underground. In Nagasaki, hills border the city, so the destruction radius of the bomb
was not as bad as the bomb dropped in Hiroshima, but the results were still terrifying ("Effects").

One and eight tenths of square miles were destroyed, 35,000 to 40,000 were killed or missing,
and another 40,000 were injured ("Figures"). Although the numbers in Hiroshima were a little

The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster
Sarah Byrnside
PhySci 111
Research Paper
24 April 2015
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster was a nuclear accident
that occurred in 2011 at the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant following an underwater earthquake
that produced tsunamis, eventually resulting in a full nuclear meltdown and toxic amounts of
radiation being dumped into the atmosphere. This particular nuclear disaster is infamous because,
despite the earthquake and tsunami, it is still considered a man–made disaster. Had Fukushima plant
workers been properly trained regarding what to do in the event of a nuclear disaster and had the
Japanese government reacted more swiftly and efficiently, the damage to the reactors would have
been less extensive and a full nuclear meltdown could have been prevented altogether. The factors
that led to the meltdown, however, can be learned from and used to develop better safety procedures
and educate people so that hopefully the next nuclear accident can be avoided in the future. Simply
put, the nuclear reactors at the Fukushima plant use chemical reactions to boil water, producing
electricity. They achieve this through the process of nuclear fission, which is the splitting of an atom
in two and gives off energy in the form of heat. If one of the pieces of the split atom collides with
another atom, that atom will then undergo fission and hit other atoms which will undergo the same
process. This chain reaction of splitting atoms continues on

Nuclear Power Provides Materials For Dirty Bombs
Nuclear Power provides materials for "dirty bombs" which are nuclear weapons which have been
made from nuclear waste material. This is bad because it will make nuclear war not only terrifying
but inevitable. Since our planet is filled with countries that have governments whom are unreliable,
and corrupt nuclear weapons can and will be pushed into the hands of unreliable people. Terrorist
groups will have better access to nuclear weapons, and will be able to use them against whomever
they choose. Governments may also use these nuclear weapons to serve some kind of twisted
political agenda.
It seems plausible to imagine the government of Iran handing over nuclear warheads to terrorist
groups that they have influence over like Hezbollah or Hamas. Similar concepts are present in North
Korea, except if the world were to switch completely to nuclear power Kim Jong Un may not have
to use Photoshop to demonstrate that he has nuclear weapons. During the cold war only a few
countries had access to nuclear weapons, now imagine that everyone has nuclear weapons. Every
country in the world, and every terrorist group has the power to blow up cities, countries, and
together the entire world. [BOP]
Before Chernobyl, the catastrophic accident which occurred at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant,
nuclear power was viewed as a greater green energy which would save us all. But this has been
proved to be false because of all the different nuclear disasters. Nuclear Power plants are often built

Nuclear Waste Disposal Essay example
Nuclear Waste Disposal
As the millenium approaches, we are faced with the problems created by our technological
advances. Everyday we are forced to see the results, from acid rain to polluted beaches. But there is
one problem in particular that will probably out–live our generation and the generation which has
created it. If properly contained and monitored, it has little affect on us and our environment.
However, once it is free of it's containment, it is a destructive and deadly force. This problem is
nuclear waste.
Thirty thousand metric tons of spent fuel rods from power reactors and another 380,000 cubic
meters of high level radioactive waste, have been produced in the United States since the beginning
of the nuclear age. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In a nuclear reactor of a nuclear power plant, the fission process is contained within the zirconium or
magnesium cladding that surrounds the fuel rods. The fuel rods are "spent" after the fission takes
place. They are highly radioactive and give off dangerous gamma radiation, which is similar to X–
ray and can therefore penetrate through a human body. It is necessary to shield the spent fuel rods
with water and thick lead walls (Bertell, 1985). These fuel rods and their contents, are essentially
what comprises nuclear waste and is what needs to be kept secure for hundreds of thousands of
years.
Two types of radiation
There are two types of radiation; particle and penetrating. Penetrating radiation or gamma radiation,
can pass through human tissue and damages cell functions. After about 500 years, gamma radiation
in nuclear fuel waste drops to low enough levels that it poses no real threat to humans (AECB,
1992). Particle radiation includes alphan and beta radiation. This type of radiation is given off by the
longer lived radioactive substances. This means that the substances remain hazardous for many
thousands of years. Neither these types can penetrate human tissue. However, they can affect cell
function and therefore cause cancer if the radioactive substance has been ingested or inhaled

Nuclear Warfare And Its Effects On The World
In early August 1945, President Harry Truman approved for two nuclear bombs, uranium–235 and
plutonium–239, made by the United States of America and the United Kingdom, to be dropped on
Hiroshima and Nagasaki bringing the Second World War to an abrupt end. On the first day of the
bombing, each city lost an estimate of at least one half of their population. During the following
months, between 150,000 and more than 246,000 deaths occurred from the effect of burns, radiation
sickness, and other injuries, compounded by illness brought on by the nuclear effects. This is act is
otherwise known as nuclear warfare and with the advancements of modern technology, the extent of
damage is increased while the amount of time it takes for these effects ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This is just one example of the many nuclear weapons in the world. Nuclear warfare is caused by a
military conflict or a political strategy in which one uses nuclear weaponry to inflict damage upon
the opponent. Some believe that politicians and military personnel only want to possess nuclear
weapons because of the heightened sense of power and feeling of security. It's scary to think that the
human race is in the hands of the people who own these weapons. The effects of nuclear use can be
divided into four categories: instantaneous, near–immediate, short term, and long term. The heart of
a nuclear explosion reaches temperatures over a several million degree centigrade resulting in a heat
flash over a wide area that vaporizes all human tissue. At Hiroshima, within a radius of half a mile,
the only remains of most of the people caught in the open were their shadows burnt into stone. The
near–immediate effects are the people inside buildings or otherwise shielded, will be indirectly
killed by the blast and heat effects as buildings collapse and all inflammable materials burst into
flames. The immediate death rate will be over 90%. Outside the area of total destruction will be
survivors. However, these survivors will be blinded, suffering from fatal burns, bleeding from glass
splinters, or have suffered massive internal injuries. The death rate will continue to climb since
emergency services would be incapable of responding due to destroyed equipment

Nuclear Engineering Research Paper
One of the world's most reliable and clean resource for energy is nuclear energy. There is a lot of
information about how to become, and what nuclear engineers do. Nuclear energy will be one of the
best sources of energy to use in the future, once nuclear scientist find out how to harness the power
of fusion it will be a big game changer in energy. Once they do, it will be a cheaper, safer, and a
more reliable alternative to other energy sources. As of this moment nuclear scientist are making
breakthroughs on how to harness the power of fusion. Once nuclear scientist figure out how to
harness the energy of fusion, they will build more nuclear power plants and those plants will need
engineers. In the future a reliable job to pursue would be nuclear engineering.
The duties of this occupation, both general and specific, are important to know for becoming a
nuclear engineer. The duties for this job include designing or develop equipment, such as reactor
cores, radiation shielding, and other instrument that are needed to run a nuclear plant. Some
engineers tell the workers what needs to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The majority of nuclear engineers work full time, but one in three engineers work more than forty
hours a week. Their schedules may vary depending on company they work for.The majority of
nuclear engineers work full time, and some work overtime. These schedules may vary according to
the industries in which they work ("Nuclear"). The hazards or disadvantages of being a nuclear
engineer are high. Nuclear Engineers work in teams to see caution and risk easly are standard for the
industry appropriately so, given the dangers of nuclear radiation. The work done in nuclear power
stations is usually indoors, often on a seven–day shift system, and conditions can be both hot and
cramped. The advantages of being a nuclear engineer is that it has a higher pay than most
engineering jobs

Nuclear Power Plant Safety Systems
Topic 1 – Nuclear Power Plant Safety Systems IAEA Synopsis: In 1956, 81 member nations
unanimously approved The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Statute, the guiding
document for the creation of this committee. The objective of the statue stated that "the Agency shall
seek to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity
throughout the world. It shall ensure, so far as it is able, that assistance provided by it or at its
request or under its supervision or control is not used in such a way as to further any military
purpose." As such, the IAEA was established in 1957 to respond to global fears about the potential
dangers of nuclear energy. Since its creation, the IAEA has responded to a wide variety of issues
related to atomic energy. At the time of its creation, the primary fear was that nuclear power could
be an avenue to create and use nuclear weapons. Indeed, this is still a concern today. Of late, the
IAEA has focused on ensuring the safety of nuclear power plants. Various safety–system failures in
nuclear power plants calls for the revision of the current safety standards and approaches for
maintain the safety of nuclear power sources. One such event that caused this shift in focus was the
Fukushima accident in 2011.
March 11, 2011–Fukushima Accident At 2:46pm Japan tremored under the Great East Japan
Earthquake, magnitude 9.0. Although the earthquake was offshore, the damage was catastrophic.
The

The Nature Of Nuclear Politics And The 21st Century : A...
Introduction – The Nature of Nuclear Politics in the 21st Century: A New Paradigm or Overblown
Hysteria? From the onset of its creation, nuclear weapons have dominated the headlines and more
importantly occupied the minds of policymakers. Cold warriors likely remember drills in school, to
shelter in place in the event of a nuclear attack or accident. Moreover they likely remember the
general uneasiness and uncertainty that a nuclear attack was imminent. Thankfully, the cold war has
ended, but the world's fascination with nuclear weapons has not. The post 9/11 era has brought non–
state actors, namely organized terrorist groups, to the fold. Because these groups do not exercise
sovereign in any given territory, the worry is that the idea of mutually assured destruction does not
apply to these groups. Furthermore some actors on the international stage are worried that rogue or
criminal states will aid terrorist groups in their search for nuclear weapons and that the US would be
powerless to stop them. In fairness, there is a chance, however small, that such an event could
happen, but should the US and other international actors be so worried about the idea of nuclear
terrorism? John Mueller and Michael Levi aim to answer this important question and many others in
their books, Atomic Obsession and On Nuclear Terrorism respectively. The purpose of this piece is
to summarize the author's main arguments, compare them and explore gaps in policy that these
arguments may fill.

The Nuclear Proliferation Treaty ( Npt )
Uranium is the fuel most by and large used to make nuclear imperativeness. That is by virtue of
uranium particles split isolated by and large easily. It 's also a particularly standard segment, found
in shakes all over the place all through the world. Regardless, the specific kind of uranium used to
convey nuclear imperativeness, called U–235, is remarkable. U–235 makes up under one percent of
the uranium on the planet.
Though a segment of the uranium the United States uses is mined in this country, most is outside.
The U.S. gets uranium from Australia, Canada, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Uzbekistan. At the point
when uranium is mined, it must be removed from distinctive minerals. It ought to moreover be
arranged before it can be used.
Since nuclear fuel can be used to make nuclear weapons and what 's more nuclear reactors, just
nations that are a bit of the Nuclear Non–Proliferation Treaty (NPT) are allowed to import uranium
or plutonium, another nuclear fuel. The settlement propels the tranquil use of nuclear fuel,
furthermore limiting the spread of nuclear weapons.
A normal nuclear reactor uses around 59,000 metric tons (65,000 tons) of uranium reliably.
Complex methods allow some uranium and plutonium to be re–enhanced or reused. This reduces the
measure of mining, isolating, and taking care of that ought to be done.
Nuclear essentialness produces control that can be used to power homes, schools, associations, and
facilities. The principle nuclear reactor to convey

Nuclear Facility in the Canterbury Council
Today I am writing to you today to inform you that building a nuclear facility in the Canterbury
Council would be nothing but harmful and damaging towards our community. In order to explain
and elaborate on this topic defining what an atom means is extremely valid. Atoms are composed of
three type of particles: protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons are heavier than
electrons and lay in the center of the atom, which is called the nucleus. Electrons are extremely
lightweight and exist in a cloud orbiting the nucleus. The electron cloud has a radius 10,000 times
greater than the nucleus.
This is a great example of an atom:

A nuclear reaction is considered to be the process in which two nuclei of an atom and a subatomic
particle (such as a proton or neutron) collide to produce one or more nuclides that are different from
the original nucleus that began the process. Thus, a nuclear reaction must cause a transformation of
at least one nuclide to another. Nuclear reaction" is a term implying an induced (forced/man made)
change in a nuclide.

In this is a symbolic representation of a nuclear reaction, they react from the intermediate nucleus.
Then decays immediately into two alpha particles. The protons are symbolically represented by the
red spheres, and the neutrons by the blue spheres.
Radioactive isotopes are used for numerous basic science and engineering, mainly for things such
as, medical imaging procedures and environmental and industrial tracers.

Nuclear Energy Is Not the Answer
In our modern world of today, we use increasingly more energy every day. According to the most
recent study done by the US Energy Information Administration in 2008, the world uses 493
quadrillion BTUs or energy a year, and 82% of the energy is generated from fossil fuels. This source
makes clear, that fossil fuels are a big part of life, and as they run out, it is more and more important
to find a solution. In the midst of a polluted world, what we need is a powerful, sustainable, and
clean energy source. Solar power, wind power, geothermal heating/cooling, biomass burning, and
hydro–electric turbines all seem like good solutions. At first glance, nuclear power does too. Its
powerful, sustainable, and will last a long time right? However, if you take a closer look, and you
can see that nuclear energy is not the answer. Nuclear power is not safe. An accident is likely to
occur every 10–20 years. For example, a European study from Science Daily stated that, "Based on
the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number of nuclear meltdowns that have
occurred, scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz have calculated that such
events may occur once every 10 to 20 years." This evidence demonstrates that, nuclear accidents
happen more often than we think they do. The dangerous aspect of a nuclear accident is the amount
of radiation that is spewed into the atmosphere and the surrounding environment. Radiation causes
sickness, cancer, mutations,

How Did The Three Mile Island Meltdown
Because of a malfunction in a nuclear generating plant near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, the effects
were devastating. Although no one's health was seriously affected, the public's fear of any other
disaster happening in cause of what is dubbed as the Three Mile Island Incident closed down many
of the surrounding plants in the area.
In 1979, at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant, a cooling malfunction caused part of the core
to melt in the #2 reactor. The TMI–2 was destroyed.
Some radioactive gas was released a couple of days after the accident, but not enough to cause any
dose above background levels to the local residents.
Responding to the loss of cooling water, high–pressure injection pumps pushed replacement water
into the reactor system. As water and steam escaped through the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Investigation showed that minimum amounts of radiation leaked, not enough to cause any abnormal
disruptions in the immune system.
After the major earthquake and tsunami that took place in Japan, Japanese officials tried to sort out
whether jolted nuclear reactors could slip into full meltdown.
Some experts compared the events unfolding to partial meltdown that occurred at the Three Mile
Island nuclear plant.
"Three Mile Island #2 was a pressurized water reactor," Corradini said. "This one is a boiling water
reactor. But in terms of approximate behavior and how the plant runs, they are similar.
Although the Three Mile Island nuclear plant is similar to the one in Japan, it is quite different from
it and the Ukrainian disaster at Chernobyl.
At both the Three Mile Island plant and the one in Japan were both mechanical, the devastating one
in Chernobyl was caused by a human error.
After the cleanup of #2 at the Three Mile Island nuclear plant, safety and reliability were increased
and training was improved.
The accident fostered better understanding of fuel melting and the containment

Nuclear Energy Disaster Waiting For Happen?
Nuclear Energy...Disaster Waiting to Happen?
On March 11, 2011, Japan was rattled by a powerful earthquake and tsunami. Thousands of lives
were changed forever. As a result, there were countless deaths. Notwithstanding, the earthquake and
the tsunami destroyed homes, businesses, and roads. An excessive amount of debris was left behind.
The impact of the tsunami, as well as the earthquake, caused a major power outage which, in turn,
caused a nuclear meltdown and/or explosion at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. In the
wake of the earthquake and the tsunami that followed, there were long–term effects on the
environment as well as on the quality of life of the Japanese people. As there is always a chance of a
nuclear meltdown and/or ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One year following the nuclear meltdown and/or explosion, much of the area surrounding
Fukushima has remained closed (Fecht). The land is riddled with radioactive contamination. The
timeline for clean–up will span is at least forty years (Ridley). Many evacuated residents remain in
temporary housing with little hope of returning home (Ridley). Still another issue affecting the
quality of life is Japan's foodstuff. Following the nuclear disaster, the government has had to ban
provisions that were likely contaminated; they, also, have had to commence a massive food testing
program (Gibney). This not only affected the farmers of Japan, but small hometown gardeners as
well. Of course, the region most affected by radioactive fallout is the zone in the immediate vicinity
of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Even with negative long–term effects, the Japanese
government, yet believes nuclear power to be a viable source for energy.
As of 2015, there were sixteen nuclear power plants in use in Japan, seven others were closed, and
nine more were under construction (Gibney). Even with the possibility of another nuclear disaster,
the government has included nuclear power as a prerequisite for meeting and maintaining Japan's
energy needs. In June of the same year, Japan announced a proposal to "maintain [their] nuclear
power [usage] at 20–22 percent until the year 2030" (Gibney). Although the government

The Big Bertha Project
The Big Bertha Project The City of Seattle enlisted the world's largest tunnel boring machine called
"Big Bertha" back in 2013. Since then, the boring machine has faced numerous challenges. Since it's
arrival to Seattle in 20113, Big Bertha has traveled only 1,280 feet out of the 9,210 foot destination.
At this point, the tunnel was expected to be almost done by now. But, due to the errors occurring
with the machine and unexpected geographical problems it has set Seattle back by two years of
drilling. With so much time lost, many are questioning whether the city should continue to support
the project. The reason why Seattle is undertaking the drilling of this underground highway is to
have an alternative to the 99 Viaduct in case of a major earthquake. The current highway system
starts at the bank of downtown Seattle's Waterfront. Engineers have determined that the Viaduct will
not be safe at all if a major earthquake strikes Seattle. One major issue today with Big Bertha is that
the contract is not being met. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is
trying to hold contractors accountable to meet the requirements originally agreed upon. This project
is taking up nearly 1.34 billion dollars of taxpayers money. The State of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Some are proposing that the state should cut the program entirely and cut our losses as there have
been too many obstacles so far. Others supporting the continued drilling of Big Bertha say that we
are too far into it to back out now. It has been one of those things that have caused people to wonder
if it ever will get finished. This project is a major concern for every taxpayer in Washington as it
accounts for more than $100 dollars for every person in the state who pays taxes per year. The
drilling project presented a huge bill when the State originally approved it and it is now costing way
more than anyone anticipated. This is a huge financial burden for the

Of The Movie 'Uranium: Twisting The Dragon's Tail'
Uranium: Twisting the Dragon's Tail
Uranium was formed from an exploding star. It all started when Henri Becquerel put a chunk of
uranium and a film in a dark drawer, and when he took it out there was a print of the rock on the
film.
Radiation is used for many things. Before they knew it was dangerous, people used radiation for
almost everything. They used it for its ability to glow in the dark, put it in paint to make the colors
vibrant, and even went so far as to take a bath in it to cleanse their body. Today, many types of
cancer treatments use a form of radiation to target and kill the cancer cells. It is also used in
hospitals to sterilize needles and other things used in procedures.
Uranium is still used as a form of energy. There have been, and still are, quite a few nuclear power
plants, the most famous of which is Chernobyl. A meltdown occurred ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
During World War II, Robert Oppenheimer discovered a way to force the uranium to split apart and
release energy. The United States dropped the bomb on Hiroshima, Japan and wiped out the entire
city. It ended the feud between the U.S. and Japan.
I believe that uranium is a very dangerous thing. It can be used to help many people and keep them
alive, but it also has to power to kill a lot of people. Exposure to too much radiation can cause acute
radiation syndrome. That thought genuinely frightens me. One little malfunction in a plant
somewhere and a whole lot of people will die. And for what? A bit of energy?
I am not totally against the use of uranium to obtain power, but I do believe that we need to keep
thinking of a way to protect the people from the harmful effects exposure can cause. If something
goes wrong in one of those plants and cities have to be evacuated, everyone is affected. Not a single
person will come out with no harm. Even if it is something as simple as losing their home, it can still
have negative psychological

Essay on Terrorism: Its Forms and Effects
In recent years, terrorism has been on the rise. The most famous attack in recent years was that of
the destruction of the twin towers in 2001. It caused a massive public outcry at the atrocity of the
actions. What most people don't realize, however is that the people who make these attacks, called
terrorists, have a goal in mind. People also don't realize that there are many types of terrorism, and
are not just limited to the attacker flying planes into famous buildings. The types of terrorism are
quite varied, the reasons for each just as much, and the public reaction is never the same for any of
them. Terrorism as it is defined is the use of violent acts in order to intimidate or coerce a population
into a particular type of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some examples of agents used in this type of terrorism are anthrax, botulism, and smallpox.
Obviously, these diseases, and others that fall into this category would be devastating if released
upon a population of people. Therefore this would make these the prime thing for bio–terrorists to
use against their targets. Category B is the next most severe level, which are somewhat easily
transmitted, but not quite as easily. They also have a moderate mortality rate, and would take some
preparation on medical personal's part (CDC, Bioterrorism Agents/Diseases). Some examples of
Category B agents would be E. Coli, Salmonella, and Typhus Fever. These diseases would be
moderately devastating to a nation, and terrorists would want them for being easier to obtain then
Category A agents. Category C is the lowest level of pathogens. This tier consists of pathogens that
are in development, and are not really a threat to the public at large at the current time (CDC,
Bioterrorism Agents/Diseases). These are pathogens with high potential for mass chaos. These
pathogens will have high availability, production and transmission rates, and potential for high
mortality rates. These are diseases that are being genetically engineered, and, because they are not
yet fully developed, they are not very high on priority lists. If they were to come into full use then
they would most often be considered as Category A diseases. The second type of terrorism is

Argumentative Essay On Stockpiles
When the topic of nuclear weapons, stockpiles, or power plants comes to the forefront, many people
automatically associate nuclear materials to terrorist. Because of that association, people
automatically think the only dangers faced are when nuclear materials are in the hands of the
terrorist. However, that has been proved to be a false assumption as accidents at nuclear stockpiles
and power plants pose a far greater danger to American security than the deliberate use of nuclear
weapons by terrorist. Throughout the paper, arguments will be constructed backing up the previous
statement. The paper will start with a basic understanding of fission and radiation to set the
foundation of the basic knowledge of the science behind the subject. Then ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It is a well–known fact that terrorist has had committed a substantial amount of devastating terrorist
attacks, but it is known that terrorist had actually never used nuclear weapons in a terrorist attack
(Lecture 12/01). With that said, these upcoming paragraphs are going to serve as the reasoning as to
why terrorist have not and will most likely not use nuclear weapons in terrorist attacks. First off,
Ferguson explains relatively few terrorist groups are likely to use nuclear weapons in a terrorist
attack (Ferguson 176). This is due to a few different reasons, such as political, priority and
environmental reasons. As far as the political reasons go, terrorist groups may have feared that a
nuclear attack would deter and scare off their supporters and allies. For the priorities reason, terrorist
generally like to commit attacks that cause instantaneous devastation to people and often results in
many deaths. Because the deaths from a nuclear attack would not be immediate, and instead a more
long–term impact, this causes terrorist to move the nuclear attack motives down on their priority list
(Ferguson 178). This is related to the text in the "four faces of terrorism" as it said terrorist are more
likely to steer away from weapons that may not cause a significant amount of casualties'

Do You Know The Repercussions For Using Nuclear Energy?
Do you know the repercussions for using nuclear energy? Do you know how much it costs to fund
nuclear energy? Do you know what a nuclear accident could do to thousands of people? Nuclear
energy was first used in a peaceful manner, but in August 6, 1946, a tragic event called Hiroshima
happened. (The History of Nuclear Energy 1985) Nuclear energy should not be used because it can
cause a negative impact on all living beings, it is an expensive way to produce energy, and nuclear
energy can cause great tragedies.
First, nuclear energy can cause negative impacts to people's lives. For instance, in the environment
and health, when using cooling water systems to keep nuclear power plants from overheating, many
harmful outcomes can occur to our wildlife that impact the community. As mentioned by Rose Kivi,
"First, the cooling system pulls water from an ocean or river source. Fish are inadvertently captured
in the cooling system intake and killed. Second, after the water is used to cool the power plant, it is
returned to the ocean or river. The water that is returned is approximately 25 degrees warmer than
the water was originally. The warmer water kills some species of fish and plant life" (Kivi 2017).
This will not only decrease the population of marine animal species, but it will also create an
imbalance in the ecosystem. It will pollute the nearby water sources available to humans.
Furthermore, nuclear energy can negatively affect human bodies. For example, it can cause cancer.

Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power Plant
The way a nuclear power plant produces energy is by a process called nuclear fission which is
splitting the nucleus of an atom. Fission turns water into steam and the steam makes pressure. Then
the steam that is made turns a turbine that is connected to a generator and the turning of the turbine
forces the generator to produce electricity ("Nuclear Fission"). The energy source for a nuclear
power plant is Uranium and it is a very rare resource. Once it's gone then it's gone forever and when
that happens then we cannot produce anymore nuclear energy. Depending on the demand of
Uranium, it is estimated that this element will only last another thirty to sixty years. I am not for
nuclear energy because I think that the cons out weigh the pros.
There are tons of issues with nuclear energy. Some bad stuff that happens are the high cost to build a
nuclear power plant, it's not a renewable source of energy, the nuclear waste it produces, and nuclear
accidents. The question to ask is do the pros outweigh the cons? France is concerned about all those
problems so they are looking to close up to seventeen nuclear power plants by 2025. They want a
renewable energy source but if they do this then they run into a problem which is seventy–five
percent of their electricity comes from nuclear energy which is the highest percentage in the world.
Frances plants are also getting old. The average life span of a plant is built to last only forty years.
Fifteen out of fifty–eight of them are over

Switching To Nuclear Energy

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Stefanie Yang

More from Stefanie Yang (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Switching To Nuclear Energy