Essay On Nuclear Energy

Essay on Nuclear Energy
Nuclear Energy – Clean, Environmentally Friendly Energy
Nuclear energy is the world's largest source of emission–free energy. Nuclear power plants produce no controlled air pollutants, such as sulfur and
particulates, or greenhouse gases. "Renewables" like solar, wind and biomass can help. But only nuclear power offers clean, environmentally friendly
energy on a massive scale. The use of nuclear energy in place of other energy sources helps to keep the air clean, preserve the Earth's climate, avoid
ground–level ozone formation and prevent acid rain. "Currently, there are 103 commercial nuclear power plants producing electricity in the United
States, located at 64 sites in 31 states. They are, on average, 24 years old, and...show more content...
In the past, Fallout shelters were administered by the U.S. Federal Civil Defense Administration, which operated from 1951 in various forms until 1979,
when its functions were pulled into the Federal Emergency Management Agency (http://www.earthmountainview.com/shelters.html#fallout).
However, now this concern of being exposed to these sorts of particles has waned and people are not as worried as in the past. Do to having stronger
plants for this sort of energy to be produced, these plants have been going on for years and it just keeps improving with use. The 103 U.S. nuclear power
plants are licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to operate for 40 years, and can renew their licenses for an additional 20 years (Eser
notes April 4th). To date, 30 have received license renewal and 40 more are expected to have their licenses renewed. Eventually, virtually all U.S.
nuclear plants are expected to apply for license renewal (http://www.nei.org).
Citizens of countries where fossil fuels are being utilized are concerned at the possible chance of global warming. So many greenhouse gases emitted,
ice burgs and caps are shifting or melting, that population is beginning to worry about what is going to happen to the environment in the future if this
source is kept being used. With nuclear energy we don't have to worry about the environmental changes. Nuclear energy has
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay The Nuclear Power Debate
The Nuclear Power Debate
In 1953, nuclear energy was introduced into America as a cheap and efficient energy source, favoured in place of increasingly scarce fossil fuels
which caused air pollution. Its initial use was welcomed by the general public, as it was hoped to lower the price of electricity, and utilise nuclear power
for it's potential as a resource, not a weapon. However, as people became aware of the long term dangers involved in storing nuclear waste, it's use was
criticised.
Two accidents, at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, demonstrated to the world the enormous risks involved in producing nuclear power. Nuclear
power provides 17% of the world's electricity but coal is the main source, making up 39%....show more content...
Nuclear power is the only practical source, in consideration for the environment, cost and efficiency. Coal–fired generation of electricity would increase
carbon dioxide emissions, and renewable sources such as solar and hydro, are not suitable for large scale power generation. Nuclear power is not
without its own implications. The process includes disposing of radioactive waste, which poses a threat to the environment and the world if not
contained properly and temporarily disposed of with maximum security. In the thesis, "Nuclear power: an energy future we can't afford", by Peter
Kelly from Hamilton College, he wrote,
"...we'd still have to worry about terrorists making bombs out of nuclear waste.
Just five pounds of plutonium, a component of nuclear waste, is enough to make a nuclear bomb. Such a bomb could topple the World Trade Centre
and kill hundreds of thousands of people...Terrorists may be able to recruit disgruntled scientists..." Disposing of nuclear waste is extremely
controversial, because it takes thousands of years to decompose, and the radiation remains active. Other than the environmental effects of disposing
nuclear waste, the potential of radioactive fallout from a faulty reactor is a dangerous possibility, and the events following the accident at Chernobyl
demonstrated the long term destructiveness radiation is capable of. In 1986 at Chernobyl, an

Nuclear Energy Essay
There are sources of energy that are renewable and do not cause so many pollutants, however they only contribute a smaller amount to the energy
pyramid. These sources include hydro–electric power, wind power, solar energy and biomass energy. Most of these fuel sources do not produce as
much energy as efficiently as the majority of fuel sources used today. Solar power is a clean source of practically inexhaustible energy. Solar plants are
easy to construct and solar power is safe. It has many uses from heating to direct electric energy generation. Wind power is also a clean source of
energy, however it can be intermittent and low yielding. Moving along to hydro–electric energy generation which is used slightly...show more content...
(H.E.R.I.).
Many car companies today are preparing for the use of fuel cell power generation. Companies like Ford, Chrysler, and Honda are already developing or
have already developed vehicles built to run from the fuel cells or transitional motors. These engines are designed to run more efficiently and more cost
effectively than those of today. Commercial cars of today are getting increasingly more efficient due to the hundreds of thousands of engineers in the
world making improvements to the internal combustion engine. When this number is compared to the 5000 people world–wide working to develop
fuel cells it is easy to see the already efficient fuel cell in favor of the much developed combustion engine and the direction of fuel production for the
future. Squeaky clean hydrogen operated buses are also being developed for mass transportation purposes. Transportation is a preliminary test to
develop the use of the fuel cell and can easily be converted into other uses.
It is important for the consumers to realize the magnitude of the energy situation and strive to provide their children with the tools and the education
to properly conserve the resources available. These simple tasks can start in the home and can be easily applied to everyday life. For example, it's
more efficient to leave a light on instead of turning it off

Essay on Nuclear Energy Research
Nuclear energy is a fascinating discovery and an up–incoming strong energy supplier of many things in our world today. Nuclear materials include
many pieces, such as; radiation, radioactive decay, nuclear reactors, fission and fusion. It is highly possible that our world will become very
dependent on nuclear resources in the future; however, they'll not only supply us with positives but many fierce negatives as well. Nuclear energy is a
complex material that carries many deep side effects, one of which being radiation. Radiation is the emission of energy as electromagnetic waves or as
subatomic particles. Through radiation, energy is transmitted in forms such as light, heat and sound. Right alongside of radiation is...show more
content...
Whereas, fusion is the result or the process of joining two or more things together to from one single creation, for example, liquefying or melting
by applying heat. Nuclear materials not only require heat to be formed, but they also can create heat. Nuclear materials can create heat and
electricity, as well as being used in the development of weapons and medical needs. Heat from nuclear materials typically comes from nuclear fuel;
used nuclear fuel will emit high levels of both heat and radiation. Such nuclear fuels are also used to create forms of energy such as electricity in
many areas of the world today. As a weapon, nuclear material can be devastating to any ecosystem which it may come in contact with. Most
commonly, plutonium (known to be used in North Korea) or uranium is used in the creation of nuclear/atomic weapons. A product called a research
reactor is the typical starter kit for most of the world's nuclear bomb programs. This research reactor serves primarily as a neutron source and is also
called a non–power reactor because it does not generate power, such as the "power reactors" used to create heat and electricity. Nuclear materials are
also used for medical needs, such as the commonly known "X–ray", or the isotope, technetium–99m and molybdenum–99 shortages addressed in the
House of Representatives vote in 2009. In this vote, the House affirmatively decided to reestablish the domestic

Nuclear Energy Essay
Nuclear Energy Energy consumption has become a necessity and an important part of our daily life in the past 10 years. It seems that the world is
looking for an energy source that is cleaner, cheaper and more efficient and since nuclear energy has emerged it has become the forerunner for
alternative energy sources. 'As of 2004, nuclear power provided 6.5% of the world's energy and 15.7% of the world's electricity, with the U.S.,
France, and Japan together accounting for 57% of nuclear generated electricity' ('Nuclear energy facts' 2007). Nuclear energy can be a doubled edged
sword as it can be used for peaceful uses or used to manufacture weapons of mass destruction which can put the world in danger. As more countries
begin to...show more content...
But after all the advantages of using nuclear energy outweigh its disadvantages as nuclear plants emit less than one–hundredth of carbon dioxide gas
compared to coal or gas–fired energy plants so there is a very little effect on the environment. Humans living next to coal–fired power plants are
exposed to higher radiation doses than those living near nuclear plants, where the former is harmful to human health and may be responsible for acid
rain. On the other hand dependence on nuclear energy is now increasing in most countries as nuclear reactors use uranium as a fuel which is found
everywhere on earth. It is inexpensive and easier to transport than other fuels which makes them less dependent on oil and foreign fuel from other
countries. No doubt that most people believe that the world is a better place than it was 20 to 30 years ago. But actually, the world is becoming a very
dangerous place with number of countries owning nuclear weapons increasing. 'In all, there are approximately 27,600 nuclear weapons in existence'
('Weapons around the world' 2005). They are constructed using either highly enriched uranium or plutonium, which then relies on two basic ways to
release energy from an atom which are nuclear fission and nuclear fusion. Nuclear weapons are then divided into two groups, fission bombs which
break apart heavy atomic nuclei and fusion bombs which fuse light nuclei. With many recent

Essay on Nuclear Energy
Nuclear Energy
Nuclear energy–This is energy that binds together components of an atomic nucleus. This is made by the process of nuclear fission. Nuclear fission
is produced when an atomic atom is split. The way nuclear pore is made is in a nuclear reactor, this is most likely located in a nuclear power plant. the
fission that is produced is when a heavy element splits in half or is halved into two smaller nuclei, the power of the fission is located by the rate of
the splitting of the nuclei at once which causes watts of electricity to be forced into the energy type.
Energy that is released by the nuclear fission matches almost completely to that of the properties of kinetic...show more content...
The average shield of a power plant twelve to fourteen feet in diameter and fifteen to twenty feet high.
This creates a problem with gamma ray leakage out into the biomes. this usually would only happen in a time of crises, this is why shields are so
highly needed. Because of this factor there are secondary shields only used in cases of extreme emergencies. Usually this action triggers the fast pace
emergency reactions. In this time the secondary emergency system reacts, the way that it reacts is by enclosing the reactor in a gastight chamber. This
chamber has airlocks, these airlocks are double sealed and are usually two sided. The shielded covers the entire reactor, and the primary coolant
system. All the coolant vents are automatically shut up and off. This safely contain the fission products inside the shell. Another way of stopping this is
the Negative
Temperature Coefficient, what this seal does is seal off the reactor and pump in gases that are of sub–zero negative temperature properties, this freezes
the thermal neutrons, slow the fission, and finally freeze the radiation particles.
These procedures are highly effective in stopping the contamination of the local community. Because of all the possible damage nuclear power plants
are designed and operated in a manner that emphasizes the prevention of accidental release of radioactivity out into the environment. there has never
been a death caused by
a

Nuclear Energy Synthesis Essay
Across the United States 104 nuclear reactors generate around 20% of the nation's electricity. While worldwide 436 nuclear reactors generate about
15% of the world's supply every year (Carson). Some people feel as though we need to expand the fleet of nuclear reactors and increase nuclear
power production. Nuclear energy may be one of the best ways to combat global warming and reduce CO2 emissions, however if the radiation and
nuclear waste that it produces is better for our environment than the CO2 is still uncertain. In the United States the nuclear power plants use uranium
–235 as the nuclear fuel to produce energy. Most of the uranium that the United States uses is found in Wyoming and New Mexico (Nuclear Energy).
U–235 is mined using methods similar to other ores. However when the uranium is mined it can expose the miners to radiation....show more content...
The spent fuel rods and the other products produced by the nuclear fuel process are highly reactive. This waste must be stored in very safe and
secure locations for tens of thousands of years, which is periods "longer than the history of most governments the world has seen" as the former
Atomic Energy Commission put it (Carson). The uranium that is used in the reactors has a half life, that is long it takes for half the nuclei in the
radioactive material to decay, of 10,000 years, while plutonium, another nuclear fuel, has a half life close to 25,000 (Carson). Some say that it is too
much of a burden to place on future generations to be able to properly monitor and maintain waste dumps that will last 20 times the length of known
civilization. As Michio Kaku put it in Nuclear Power: Both Sides "The controversy surrounding [nuclear] waste boils down to one question– can we
trust and man made structure to isolate high–level waste for tens of thousands of years given our always–changing social institutions and the vagaries
of war, revolutions, and social upheavals"

What is Nuclear Power? Essays
The process used was to gather information from books, the Internet, and interviewing my father who works at a nuclear power plant.
There are many forms of energy. Coal, gas, oil, and nuclear power are the most common forms of energy used in the United States. Three of these
energies are limited: coal, gas, and oil. Nuclear power is unlike the other three because it uses the fission process instead of combustion. This form of
power is unlimited. It produces heat energy like the others, but does not produce Carbon Dioxide and other particulate emissions.
Nuclear Power is made by Nuclear Fission. To create fission you must split a nucleus (usually Uranium) with aneutron. This...show more content...
Alpha particles are another type of radiation. Alpha particles are positively charged particles that lose power rapidly. They are not dangerous to the
skin tissue but if inhaled or ingested can be fatal. A simple sheet of paper can stop Alpha Particles.
Also Beta Particles are radiation. Beta Particles are positive or negative electrons. They are like Alpha Particles, they are only dangerous if inhaled or
ingested. Clothing or aluminum can stop Beta Particles. All of these types of radiation can be considered nuclear waste, but also often have uses. X
Rays use radiation to examine us. Radiation is used in medicine, dentistry, and industries. Remember the next time you get an X– Ray you are exposed
to radiation.
There are two types of reactors. One is the Boiling Water Reactor (BWR). First, pure water is pumped into the reactor and boiled into steam. The steam
travels through the containment structure to the turbine. The turbine spins turning a generator that makes electricity. The steam goes to a condenser.
The condenser uses colder water (usually from a river or the sea) to condenses the steam into water, which is reused by the reactor. A BWR has only
one "side".
Boiling Water Reactor (BWR)
The second type is the Pressurized Water Reactor. The Pressurized Water Reactor is different from the

Persuasive Essay On Nuclear Energy
"In 2016, nuclear energy accounted for 59.9 percent of U.S. emission generation," according to (greenpeace.org). This is nearly as much carbon
dioxide as would be produced from some 118 million cars per year. To think the United States is funding an operation that is slowing, but surely
doing damage to the environment is profound. There are other options then to only relying on hazardous nuclear energy as a source of power. Just by
making the switch to using renewable energy resources would cause the amount of pollution released in the U.S to drop by a little over thirty percent,
and the cost of production would decrease by more than fifty percent of what it is today. Removing nuclear power plants and implementing the usage of
renewable energy resources throughout the U.S. would be highly beneficial because it would cause less damage to the environment, it would allow for
a cost effective alternative source of energy, and it would reduce the vulnerability of the public. To illustrate, the amount of pollution that is created as a
result of using nuclear energy is detrimental to the environment. Since, "there is still no safe reliable solution for dealing with the radioactive waste
produce" (www.greenpeace.org), the waste produced by nuclear power plants will remain hazardous eternally. All current commercial nuclear power
plants function through the process of nuclear fission. There are a tremendous amount of nuclear power plants and commonly they all convert energy
into

Essay on Power of Nuclear Energy
Abstract
The use of nuclear energy is a big topic for debate. Many countries have fully embraced it while others, such as the U. S., haven't. Nuclear energy is
feared for its danger and scorned because of its wastes. On the other hand, nuclear energy does have some pros like cheaper cost of energy and
environmentally safe. Reactor breeders show great promise in nuclear waste, but are it enough to convince the nation?
Introduction
Nuclear knowledge has existed for a long time. Nuclear Engineering U.S. Department of Energy relates, вЂ•By 1900, the physicists knew the atom
contains large quantities of energyвЂ– (par 11). Many others formed good theories, such as Ernest Rutherford and Einstein's contribution with his
equation E=mc^2. In 1934...show more content...
Nuclear Engineering U.S. Department of Energy explains that, вЂ• It [self–sustaining chain] would happen if enough uranium could be brought together
under proper conditionsвЂ– (par 19).
The result of all this talk was that in 1942 Fermi gathered scientists at the University of Chicago to discuss their theories and possibly create a
self–sustaining chain reaction. By November of that year they had constructed plans and were prepared to build this new model known as Chicago
Pile–1. Nuclear Engineering U.S. Department of Energy describes the model as, вЂ•In addition to uranium and graphite, it contained control rods
made of cadmium. Cadmium is a metallic element that absorbs neutrons. When the rods were in the pile, there were fewer neutrons to fission uranium
atoms. This slowed the chain reaction. When the rods were pulled out, more neutrons were available to split atoms. The chain reaction sped upвЂ–(par
21). In December of 1942 the scientists were ready to demonstrate their hard work. This was a huge break through in the nuclear world.
Most of the early research done on nuclear energy consisted of trying to make nuclear weapons. The experiments were performed in New Mexico
under the name of the Manhattan Project. Their efforts were a success with the creation of the first atom bomb. After World War II though, the use of
nuclear energy was turned more peaceful uses. In 1946 Congress created the Atomic Energy

Argumentative Essay On Nuclear Energy
One of the most pressing topics of debate in the recent years has been the different sources of energy and their effects on the environment. People have
started to realize the negative effects of non–renewable energy, such as greenhouse gas emissions and other negative effects on the environment, but
neglect to take action and implement more ecofriendly energy sources. For the past 300 years the world has been predominantly powered by coal and
other non–renewable energy sources, but now it is time to move past these energy sources and transition to more efficient, clean energy like nuclear
energy. In those past three centuries, we have learned a lot about how fossil fuels effect the environment, while also discovering clean energy sources
that can replace the outdated energy sources. In this essay, I will argue that nuclear energy is the solution to the energy debate and prove that it is the
best energy source based on its effect on the environment, economy and energy efficiency. It is an undeniable fact that greenhouse gas emissions are
having a negative effect on the environment which is causing a raising global temperature. This process is called global warming and although
scientist believe it is natural to some extent, there is also many scientific publications linking greenhouse gas emissions to accelerated global warming.
However, since nuclear energy is a clean energy source, nuclear energy doesn't emit greenhouse gases which would help slow down the process of

Nuclear energy has been used since 1895 to create weapons that could destroy men by the millions. Scientists later transformed this destructive weapon
into a new form of usable, renewable energy. Nuclear energy is energy created by harnessing the energy produced by the nuclear reactions that take
place inside the nucleus of the Uranium Isotope 235, ("Nuclear Energy"). Nuclear energy is one attempt to decrease the rate at which nonrenewable
fossil fuels are being consumed. Some believe nuclear energy to be an environmentally friendly and self sustaining way to produce energy; however,
there are a countless number of social and economically risks to consider; ultimately, the detrimental effects power plant leaks and explosions have on
the human body, the cost it takes to produce the plants, and the production of nuclear waste, should be enough to persuade one to turn away from using
nuclear energy as a source of power.
The fear of a nuclear power plants is reasonable, considering there were thirty–three accidents between the 1950's and early 2000's, (McInnes, Colin).
Multiple incidents jeopardized the health of employees and near by citizens. Six of these incidents happened in the United States, five in Japan, and
three in the United Kingdom and Russia. "Thirty–five liters of highly enriched Uranium solution leaked during transfer," in the United Kingdom; more
than 100 workers were exposed to one hundred and fifty millirems of radiation a day in Japan; reactors in

Pros and Cons of Nuclear Energy Essay
Pros and Cons of Nuclear Energy
Nuclear power was the world's fastest growing form of energy in the 1990's. However, presently it is the second slowest growing worldwide.
Considering that nuclear power accounts for eleven percent of the world's energy supply, one must ask what happened [Nuclear Power]. Why is it that
the growth of nuclear power has almost completely stalled? The simple answer is that after meltdowns such as Three Mile Island and Chernobyl,
many people are afraid of nuclear power plants, which causes great opposition to the expansion of the industry. Unfortunately, most people are not well
informed about nuclear energy; many do not take the time to view its positives and negatives.
Contrary...show more content...
Pollution is another topic with both pros and cons. Fossil fuels release harmful pollutants into the air such as carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide.
Nuclear power does not release any of those toxins into the atmosphere. However, a pollution problem with nuclear energy is thermal pollution,
where a plant's "hot effluents" are put into a nearby body of water, and raise the temperature by a small amount but enough to cause a disturbance in
the ecosystem of the lake or reservoir. Nevertheless, this could easily be solved by cooling the effluents before releasing them into the water. The
other problem facing nuclear energy is waste disposal. Nuclear waste is radioactive and very dangerous. Therefore, it must be kept buried and sealed
up for a long period of time until the radioactivity dies [Plasma–Material]. One positive fact about nuclear energy that is not disputed is its abundance.
It is estimated that at today's rate of consumption, the earth has about fifty years left of fossil fuels. In contrast, due to the very small amount of
uranium needed to create a huge amount of energy, the supply of nuclear energy is almost infinite [Jiskha].
Therefore, nuclear energy is not as bad as it is made out to be. Should the world convert completely to nuclear energy? Absolutely not, there are

The Associated Press reported, "Gov. Kate Brown signed into law legislation that would eliminate coal–generated energy, making Oregon the first state
to do so. ... 'Coal costs us all – it's hurting our climate, our economy, and our communities,' said Doug Moore, OLCV Executive Director, 'Oregonians
want clean energy, not dirtycoal, and this is a day our community will remember.' " (Banchiri).
Coal energy is a problem, not only to Americans, but to the environment as well. Coal contributes to much of the atmospherically problems that will
weigh on the upcoming generations. Therefore, we need a safe and green alternative before the damage caused by coal becomes irreversible. There
are many alternatives, but most of them are not efficient and are not able to provide large quantities of energy. Nuclear energy is a rapidly developing
industry, that could solve the problems posed by coal. The US Department of Energy and citizens should enact laws that encouragenuclear power as a
replacement to coal energy, in order to have a cleaner environment and have a long–lasting energy reservoir.
Nuclear power is a better alternative to standard coal and gas power for a variety of reasons. Nuclear impact can be measured by how beneficial it is
to the world. According to the California Environment Protection Agency Air Resources Board, "In California, the closing of the San Onofre Nuclear
Generating Station in 2012 contributed to a 24 percent increase in carbon emissions from the

Nuclear Power What if all the power you would ever need in your life came from something the size of a golf ball? 1 kilogram of uranium can
provide for every spark of energy you could use in your life from running your AC to powering an airplane. And yet this energy source is
underutilized and only makes up about 20% of the electricity used in the United States (NEI, 2017). The question now is why? If nuclear power can
create so much energy with minuscule amounts of fuel and waste why doesn't the U.S. use it more? The answer comes from such heavy reliance
on fossil fuels and a fear of all things nuclear. But this reliance on fossil fuels cannot continue for much longer because of depleting resources and
continual pollution worldwide. Power found through other means is needed to compensate for this. Energy produced through nuclear reactions
are sound and effective, providing a way to change how energy works and the effects it has worldwide. For the most part, when people hear the
word nuclear they instantly have images pop into mind. They think of atomic bombs, nuclear fallout, radiation poisoning, and sometimes the end
of the world. These views have impacted the amount of nuclear energy in the United States it produces only 8.5% of the U.S. total energy. (IER,
2016) Though this is substantially more than other alternative sources of energy it is still quite minor compared to fossil fuels. These views appear
to be generally shared across the globe with Nuclear power supplying only 11% of the world's electricity. Though 13 countries rely on nuclear energy
for over a quarter of their energy needs with France the highest at 72.3%. (NEI, 2017) But if Nuclear energy is to play a bigger role especially if it is
going to replace fossil fuel it must be sustainable meaning that there must be enough of it to run on for a long time. There are two ways to release
nuclear energy the first way is by splitting atoms a process called fission. But fission requires certain types of atoms that are big enough to break apart
such as uranium–235. Now people commonly think that these elements are hard to find but uranium is "as common as tin or zinc, and it is a
constituent of most rocks and even of the sea. (WNA, 2016)" The

Essay about Nuclear Energy
When most people think of a nuclear threat, they think of a nuclear attack from a
foreign nation. In reality, the largest nuclear threat comes not from foreign attack, but
from a much closer enemy: nuclear power. Nuclear power is very dangerous, and should
be done away with.
The nuclear age dawned in 1945, when the United States dropped atomic bombs
on two Japanese cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The bombing had at least two effects:
the Japanese surrender, bringing World War II to a swift end; and many people in the
United States, especially scientists and officials involved in the development of atomic
bombs, were awed, frightened and filled with guilt over the...show more content...
Many
people see the existing form of nuclear power as unsafe technology with a potential for
catastrophe. There have been multiple examples of this throughout the history of nuclear
power including the Browns Ferry, Three Mile Island, and Chernobyl incidents.
A serious incident occurred at a nuclear power plant in 1975 as a result of a fire

started by a candle. On March 22, 1975, two large reactors at Browns Ferry, Alabama
were operating and generating 2,200 megawatts of electricity. Beneath the plant's control
center, electricians were trying to seal air leaks among the complex array of electrical
cables that made up the electrical system of the two reactors.(Stephens 15)
The leaks were being sealed by stuffing strips of polyurethane foam among the
cables. To test for air leaks, the electricians held a lighted candle near the plastic foam to
see whether the flame flickered. Some of the foam caught on fire. Three chemical
extinguishers failed to put it out. After fifteen minutes a fire alarm sounded. Meanwhile,
the fire was spreading and destroying cables that affect the plant's electrical systems
including the reactor's Emergency Core Cooling System. A small pump had to be used to
keep the fuel core covered with water to prevent a meltdown.(Stephens 17–19)

Nuclear energy has no place in a safe, clean, sustainable future. Nuclear energy is both expensive and dangerous. And just because nuclear pollution is
invisible doesn't mean it's clean. Renewable energy is better for the environment, the economy, and doesn't come with the risk of a nuclear meltdown.
High profile disasters in Chernobyl, Ukraine in 1986 and Fukushima, Japan in 2011 have raised public awareness of the dangers of nuclear power.
Consequently, zeal for nuclear energy has fizzled. The catastrophic risks of nuclear energy–like the meltdowns of nuclear reactors in Japan or
Ukraine–far outweigh the potential benefits. New nuclear plants are more expensive and take longer to build than renewable energy sources like
wind or solar. If we are to avoid the most damaging impacts of climate change, we need solutions that are fast and affordable. Nuclear power is
neither. We can do better than trading off one disaster for another. The nuclear age is over and the age of renewables has begun. Meltdowns like the
ones in Fukushima or Chernobyl released enormous amounts of radiation into the surrounding communities, forcing hundreds of thousands of people
to evacuate. Many of them may never come back. If the industry's current track record is any indication, we can expect a major meltdown about once
per decade. The possibility of a catastrophic accident at a U.S. nuclear plant cannot be dismissed. There is still no safe, reliable solution for dealing
with the radioactive waste produced by nuclear plants. Every waste dump in the U.S. leaks radiation into the environment, and nuclear plants
themselves are running out of ways to store highly radioactive waste on site. The site selected to store the U.S.'s radioactive waste–Yucca Mountain in
Nevada–is both volcanically and seismically active. Beyond the risks associated with nuclear power and radioactive waste, the threat of nuclear
weapons looms large. The spread of nuclear technology and nuclear weapons is a threat for national security and the safety of the entire planet.
Nuclear energy isn't just bad for the environment, it's bad for our economy. Nuclear power plants are expensive to build, prompting Wall Street to call
new nuclear a "bet the farm" risk. Every

Essay On Nuclear Energy
The Americas and the Syria's energy is mostly diffrante. There is barely anything that is similar or close to be similar. There is barely anything that
is similar because Syria is in war right now. Russia is thinking after the Syria's civil war they are going to build oil refinery. Syria has a big problem
with their securing fuel. The Americas are trying to fix the smoke that is keep on coming out of the building
The woman with the question mark above her head at the bottom of the page with the oil machen, that represents that people in America is trying to fix
the oil problem. The windmill that has the other windmill next to it that represents that use use 9 quads of renewable energy every year. The nuclear
energy that is by the...show more content...
The man and the man that are shaking hands with the paper by them and the people on the right side that are happy represents that the two men signs a
contracted that they agreed with about energy. The poles that have the sparks are coming out that represents that the power cut off and it almost went
blackout and it is very dangerous.
The difference between Syria's energy and America's energy is Syria's energy has a problem securing fuel. In America's energy there isn't really a
problem with the severing fuel. In America the jobs of energy it saves people's money. In Syria the energy jobs don't really save people money. In
America we use 35 quads of oil a year, but in Syria they don't use 35 quads a year they use less. America uses 25 quads of gas a year, but in Syria they
use less gas a year. America uses 20 quads ofcoal a year, in Syria they don't use 20 quads a year they use less. In america we use 8 quads of nuclear a
year, in Syria they use less nuclear. After Syria's war Iran's will build a oil refinery, in America they are going to tell other countries to build something
for them. America is trying to reduce the emissions, Syria is not trying to reduce the emissions.
The same thing between Syria's and America's energy is that there is a problem with the energy. There are similar because they both have problems
with the energy. They are a little different because it is a different way of fixing it. They are mostly the same problem.
America's energy will

With the growing need for a safe,and reliable source of energy people need to consider nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is one of the most efficient
sources of energy in the world. Nuclear energy can be an extremely reliable source of energy. It can be cost efficient, safe,, and a reliable source of
energy. Though nuclear energy may not a perfect source of energy it will be necessary for the future. No other energy alternative is better than nuclear
energy. The benefits of nuclear energy far outway any possible risk associated with the usage of nuclear energy as an energy source.
The first reason is because the burning of fossil fuels produces most of the world's energy as of today. The burning of fossil fuels releases deadly
gases into the earth's atmosphere. This can severely damage our planet's atmosphere. Nuclear energy produces a lot less harmful gases than the burning
fossil fuels. This shows why nuclear power is a better energy source than fossil fuels in term safety. (Pushker and Hansen). Nuclear energy is
capable of replacing fossil fuels. No other source of energy can be as reliable, and make enough energy consistently burning of fossil fuels..
Alternatively many people support for a energy plan that only uses renewable energy sources for power. This plan will not be able to work. Energy
sources like wind and solar can fail to work because of weather conditions (Spector). This creates a huge problem that must be solved for this plan to
work. There might possible

Essay On Nuclear Energy

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from NeedHelpWritingAPape

More from NeedHelpWritingAPape (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay On Nuclear Energy