This is my one thing for our company

2. My Personal “One Thing“
I’m Lee, Dong - Hee one of the General Manager
from Water supply and Sewerage Department.
My first personal one thing is to use the stairs twice a day for my health
However, the BBWSP overseas projects change it.
It’s technically, one step is to further develop.
1

3. Challenges with New Project

4. Challenges with BBWSP
Lack of experience in
Overseas projects
Strain in English, Word and other
uncommonly practice.
Lack of information
about Philippines
Lack of Self-Confidence
about oversea project
But, The Dies is Cast !!!
2

5. Introduction of BBWSP

6. 3
BBWSP Characteristic

7.  Stage 1(6 Water Districts)
 Stage 2 (7 Water Districts)
 Stage 3 (11 Water Districts)
 PED(Stage 1, 2 -13 WDs)
 DBP(Stage 1, 2, 3 - 24WDs)
 Water Treatment Plant = 388MLD
- Phase 1 : 200MLD
- Phase 2 : 188MLD
 Conveyance Pipeline
- D 300 ~ 1,600mm
- L=65.5 km
4
BBWSP SUMMARY

8. SMC-K water Consortium
PROJECT OWNER
Metropolitan Waterworks
and Sewerage System
(MWSS)
SPC
San Miguel Holdings
Corporation(SMC)
Korea Water Resources
Corporation (K-water)
Nominated DESIGN
Kunhwa Engineering &
Consulting Co., Ltd.
Yooshin Engineering
Corporation
Nominated CONSTRUCTION
Daewoo Engineering &
Construction Co., Ltd.
Daelim Industrial
Co., Ltd.
5

9. Business Plan of stage 1, 2 & 3(b)
Angat River at Calumpit
WTP(Q=388MLD)
6
Conveyance pipeline
D300~1,600, L=65.5km

10. Water Treatment Plant Layout
7

11. Conveyance Pipeline Layout
- Treated Water Reservoir(B) is integrated in the conveyance pipe route.
- One line is only for SJDM Water District, while the second line will supplied
the 12 remaining WDs for easy management and efficient energy saving.
8

12. Beyond The Border !!!Ⅲ

13. Project Ups and Downs
Uncertainty
Oversea Project
 Change of
Bidding Date
 Possibility of
Business give
up and post -
pone
permanently
Spread
Negative
Outlook !!
Difficulty of
Communicating
 Language
Barrier between
Korea and
Philippines
 Lack of Trust
among
Consortium
Members
9
SPC and Conflicts
with EPC
 Conflict of TA
and EPC
 Lack of sharing
information
about design
 Delayed
Contract Design
EPC Team
Withdrawl
 EPC Cost
Over-
Estimated
 Change the
EPC Members
 Joint Office
Closed twice

14. The answer lies in the Field
10

15. 11
⇒ Clients requirements for Bidder career based experience is too high
⇒ Difficulties during preparation of pre-qualification document due to
given ceiling requirements
⇒ As of now we haven’t meet the required sufficient years of
experience set by the Client
⇒ Insufficient experience engineer for different specific line of work
⇒ Inconvenient Authentication of required documents from Notary
Office, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Philippine Embassy

16. 12

17. 13

18. 14
⇒ Sharing of Knowledge and experiences with Local Company
⇒ Coordination with Local Company during the PED and detailed
estimate
⇒ Proper approached and understanding of requirements on given
tender documents
⇒ Reliability of Technical Proposal Content is more important than
Design Format Presentation.
⇒ Having a good working environment helps to make a good results
⇒ Smooth environment between MWSS and other bidders

19. We Finally Won the BBWSP(15.11.24)!!
15

20. 16
Lesson Learn from BBWSP

21. Next Goal
Be Part of Philippines Development
Completion of Project New Project Development
17

22. Especially our Department Whole Boss
and Team Leader for
all the support, encouragement and wisdom.
To our Chairmans and President
Who gave us the privilege to be part of BBWSP
always there to support the whole Team.
Special Thanks…….
18

23. Thank You !
Salamat Po !