SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 22
Presenter: Sze-Chu Liu
Instructor: Dr. Pi-Ying Teresa Hsu
            Date: January 7, 2013
Outline
Introduction
Literature Review
Methodology



          Proposal Presentation   2
INTRODUCTION
 Background of the Study
 Purposes of the Study
 Research Question
 Definition of the Terms




           Proposal Presentation   3
Background of the Study
 A report recently released shows that the
 proficiency of English of Taiwan adults is
 ranked 30 and categorized into
 “intermediate-low level”, falling behind
 neighboring countries such as Japan and
 Korea.
                      (Education First, 2012)
           Proposal Presentation                4
Purpose of the Study
 The purpose of this study is to evaluate
 the effectiveness of computer-assisted
 pronunciation training in English for
 vocational college students in Taiwan,
 evaluating the improvement of
 pronunciation quality.


           Proposal Presentation             5
Research Question
 Are computer-assisted pronunciation
 training tools effective in improving
 pronunciation quality for vocational
 college students?




           Proposal Presentation         6
Definition of the Terms
 CAPT = Computer Assisted Pronunciation
  Training
 CALL = Computer Assisted Language
  Learning




          Proposal Presentation            7
Literature Review
 An important tenet of structural
 linguistics was that the primary medium
 of language is oral: Speech is language.
                                   (Richards & Rodgers, 2001:p.55)




           Proposal Presentation                                     8
Literature Review
 The areas where CALL-based pedagogy outpaces
 conventional materials are in the provision of:
   individual plans
   anywhere / anytime instruction
   patient tutoring
   a private space to make mistakes
   immediate, individualized instruction
   detailed records of achievement
   self-paced learning.
                                            (Nunan, 2011:p.216)

                Proposal Presentation                             9
Literature Review
 Neri et al. (2008)
   A CAPT system is used to teach a group of 11-year-old
    native Italian children in English as a foreign language.
   The improvement made by experimental group and
    control group was comparable.
   The time used by experimental group is half of control
    group.
   Teaching with CAPT helped experimental group
    improve their pronunciation of difficult and unknown
    words significantly.

               Proposal Presentation                            10
Literature Review
 Hardison (2004)
   A CAPT tool with automatic feedback of the speaker’s
    intonation in form of filtered oscillograms on computer
    screen is used.
   Experimental results revealed significant effects of
    computer-assisted training in the acquisition of second
    laguage prosody and generalization to segmental
    accuracy and novel sentences.
   A real-time visual display received positive comments
    from participants.

              Proposal Presentation                           11
METHODOLOGY
Participants
Research Design
Instruments
Procedures
Pilot Study
Statistical Analysis
          Proposal Presentation   12
Participants
                      Experimental
                                        Control Group
                         Group
                    Second-year students in a vocational
Participants
                    university
Numbers                     45                 45
                     Ranked and listed according to
                      their averaged scores of first-year
                      General English courses
Sampling
                         Systematic sample with a random
                             start combined with stratification
                             from the middle 60%
               Proposal Presentation                           13
Research Design




      Proposal Presentation   14
Instruments
 MyET




         Proposal Presentation   15
Procedures

                               Training
  Pre-test                                Post-test
                             Procedure




             Proposal Presentation                    16
Training Procedure
                  Experimental
                                    Control Group
                     Group
Teacher         Taught by the same teacher
Syllabus        Elementary level oral practice
Period          One session per week for 12 weeks
                 Blended           Traditional
                  teaching with      teaching
                  CAPT              80 minutes per
Sampling         40 minutes         session
                  teach-led
                     40 minutes
                         with CAPT
           Proposal Presentation                      17
Rating Procedure
 The pronunciation quality of each utterance is scored on a 100-point scale.
                       S1       S2                    S90

 Sentence#1                                                        Audio file #1

 Sentence #2                                                       Audio file #2




Sentence #50                                                      Audio file #50
Rating Procedure




       Proposal Presentation   19
Pilot Study
 Two small groups of students with similar
 demographic background will be studied
 in the pilot study.




           Proposal Presentation              20
Statistical Analysis
 Cronbach alpha test
   On the scores given by three raters and MyET
   To test the reliability of measurements

 ANOVA (F-test)
   On the pretest and posttest scores
   To examine the difference of teaching effectiveness
   between experimental groups and control groups


              Proposal Presentation                       21
Proposal presentation v2 1020107

More Related Content

What's hot

Unit1(testing, assessing, and teaching)
Unit1(testing, assessing, and teaching)Unit1(testing, assessing, and teaching)
Unit1(testing, assessing, and teaching)Kheang Sokheng
 
Language testing final
Language testing finalLanguage testing final
Language testing finaledac4co
 
Standards In Language Testing
Standards In Language TestingStandards In Language Testing
Standards In Language Testingmasters8
 
Language Testing Evaluation
Language Testing EvaluationLanguage Testing Evaluation
Language Testing Evaluationbikashtaly
 
Assessment &testing in the classroom
Assessment &testing in the classroomAssessment &testing in the classroom
Assessment &testing in the classroomCidher89
 
The relationship between Language testing & SLA
The relationship between Language testing & SLAThe relationship between Language testing & SLA
The relationship between Language testing & SLAKobra( Minoo) Tajahmadi
 
Proficiency Development through a Hybrid Course with e-Tandems
Proficiency Development through a Hybrid Course with e-Tandems Proficiency Development through a Hybrid Course with e-Tandems
Proficiency Development through a Hybrid Course with e-Tandems Gabriel Guillén
 
Approaches to Language Testing
Approaches to Language TestingApproaches to Language Testing
Approaches to Language Testingmpazhou
 
Dep ed order do-s2016_55
Dep ed order   do-s2016_55Dep ed order   do-s2016_55
Dep ed order do-s2016_55jhaymz02
 
Introduction to language testing (wed, 23 sept 2014)
Introduction to language testing (wed, 23 sept 2014)Introduction to language testing (wed, 23 sept 2014)
Introduction to language testing (wed, 23 sept 2014)Widya Kurnia Arizona San
 
Designing classroom language test
Designing classroom language testDesigning classroom language test
Designing classroom language testEko_Mulyono
 
Language Testing Techniques
Language Testing TechniquesLanguage Testing Techniques
Language Testing TechniquesKim Quintana
 

What's hot (20)

Unit1(testing, assessing, and teaching)
Unit1(testing, assessing, and teaching)Unit1(testing, assessing, and teaching)
Unit1(testing, assessing, and teaching)
 
Language testing final
Language testing finalLanguage testing final
Language testing final
 
Standards In Language Testing
Standards In Language TestingStandards In Language Testing
Standards In Language Testing
 
Language Testing Evaluation
Language Testing EvaluationLanguage Testing Evaluation
Language Testing Evaluation
 
Assessment &testing in the classroom
Assessment &testing in the classroomAssessment &testing in the classroom
Assessment &testing in the classroom
 
The relationship between Language testing & SLA
The relationship between Language testing & SLAThe relationship between Language testing & SLA
The relationship between Language testing & SLA
 
presentation
presentationpresentation
presentation
 
Proficiency Development through a Hybrid Course with e-Tandems
Proficiency Development through a Hybrid Course with e-Tandems Proficiency Development through a Hybrid Course with e-Tandems
Proficiency Development through a Hybrid Course with e-Tandems
 
Approaches to Language Testing
Approaches to Language TestingApproaches to Language Testing
Approaches to Language Testing
 
Dep ed order do-s2016_55
Dep ed order   do-s2016_55Dep ed order   do-s2016_55
Dep ed order do-s2016_55
 
Action Research Deans
Action Research DeansAction Research Deans
Action Research Deans
 
Introduction to language testing (wed, 23 sept 2014)
Introduction to language testing (wed, 23 sept 2014)Introduction to language testing (wed, 23 sept 2014)
Introduction to language testing (wed, 23 sept 2014)
 
Languaje Testing, I Bimestr
Languaje Testing, I BimestrLanguaje Testing, I Bimestr
Languaje Testing, I Bimestr
 
Chapter iii
Chapter iiiChapter iii
Chapter iii
 
Ed526132
Ed526132Ed526132
Ed526132
 
esbb presentation
esbb presentationesbb presentation
esbb presentation
 
Designing classroom language test
Designing classroom language testDesigning classroom language test
Designing classroom language test
 
Language Testing Techniques
Language Testing TechniquesLanguage Testing Techniques
Language Testing Techniques
 
Seminar
SeminarSeminar
Seminar
 
PowerPoint-based quizzes in wave motion: Performance and experiences of students
PowerPoint-based quizzes in wave motion: Performance and experiences of studentsPowerPoint-based quizzes in wave motion: Performance and experiences of students
PowerPoint-based quizzes in wave motion: Performance and experiences of students
 

Viewers also liked

Proposal presentation 1020617(v3)
Proposal presentation 1020617(v3)Proposal presentation 1020617(v3)
Proposal presentation 1020617(v3)思竹 劉
 
Proposal presentation
Proposal presentationProposal presentation
Proposal presentationSyed Mehboob
 
Week10_networking_2
Week10_networking_2Week10_networking_2
Week10_networking_2ispkosova
 
Presentation劉思竹v2 1020414
Presentation劉思竹v2 1020414Presentation劉思竹v2 1020414
Presentation劉思竹v2 1020414思竹 劉
 
Camtasia getting started guide
Camtasia getting started guideCamtasia getting started guide
Camtasia getting started guideandreseba20
 
Challenges of Monetary Policy Communication
Challenges of Monetary Policy CommunicationChallenges of Monetary Policy Communication
Challenges of Monetary Policy CommunicationKelvin Kizito Kiyingi
 
Money museums as_tools_for_economic_education
Money museums as_tools_for_economic_educationMoney museums as_tools_for_economic_education
Money museums as_tools_for_economic_educationKelvin Kizito Kiyingi
 
Jay baernsa2012slides
Jay baernsa2012slidesJay baernsa2012slides
Jay baernsa2012slidesAllan Karl
 
Proposal rehearsal sze_chuliu 1021216(ver. 2.1)
Proposal rehearsal sze_chuliu 1021216(ver. 2.1)Proposal rehearsal sze_chuliu 1021216(ver. 2.1)
Proposal rehearsal sze_chuliu 1021216(ver. 2.1)思竹 劉
 
Trabalhe de casa, pergunte-me como!
Trabalhe de casa, pergunte-me como!Trabalhe de casa, pergunte-me como!
Trabalhe de casa, pergunte-me como!Wallace Reis
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Proposal presentation 1020617(v3)
Proposal presentation 1020617(v3)Proposal presentation 1020617(v3)
Proposal presentation 1020617(v3)
 
Proposal presentation
Proposal presentationProposal presentation
Proposal presentation
 
Mind map about CALL
Mind map about CALLMind map about CALL
Mind map about CALL
 
Individual differences
Individual differencesIndividual differences
Individual differences
 
Prelims
PrelimsPrelims
Prelims
 
Week10_networking_2
Week10_networking_2Week10_networking_2
Week10_networking_2
 
Presentation劉思竹v2 1020414
Presentation劉思竹v2 1020414Presentation劉思竹v2 1020414
Presentation劉思竹v2 1020414
 
Camtasia getting started guide
Camtasia getting started guideCamtasia getting started guide
Camtasia getting started guide
 
Challenges of Monetary Policy Communication
Challenges of Monetary Policy CommunicationChallenges of Monetary Policy Communication
Challenges of Monetary Policy Communication
 
Xii promoción
Xii promociónXii promoción
Xii promoción
 
Money museums as_tools_for_economic_education
Money museums as_tools_for_economic_educationMoney museums as_tools_for_economic_education
Money museums as_tools_for_economic_education
 
Actividad 1
Actividad 1Actividad 1
Actividad 1
 
Jay baernsa2012slides
Jay baernsa2012slidesJay baernsa2012slides
Jay baernsa2012slides
 
Proposal rehearsal sze_chuliu 1021216(ver. 2.1)
Proposal rehearsal sze_chuliu 1021216(ver. 2.1)Proposal rehearsal sze_chuliu 1021216(ver. 2.1)
Proposal rehearsal sze_chuliu 1021216(ver. 2.1)
 
Trabalhe de casa, pergunte-me como!
Trabalhe de casa, pergunte-me como!Trabalhe de casa, pergunte-me como!
Trabalhe de casa, pergunte-me como!
 
Actividad 1
Actividad 1Actividad 1
Actividad 1
 
Gebeurtenis
GebeurtenisGebeurtenis
Gebeurtenis
 
My Presentation
My PresentationMy Presentation
My Presentation
 
IDEO U - Final project
IDEO U - Final projectIDEO U - Final project
IDEO U - Final project
 
Actividad 14
Actividad 14Actividad 14
Actividad 14
 

Similar to Proposal presentation v2 1020107

Effect of language in learning college organic chemistry
Effect of language in learning college organic chemistryEffect of language in learning college organic chemistry
Effect of language in learning college organic chemistryupnismedmultimedia
 
developing and integrating courseware for oral presentations into esp learnin...
developing and integrating courseware for oral presentations into esp learnin...developing and integrating courseware for oral presentations into esp learnin...
developing and integrating courseware for oral presentations into esp learnin...changluchieh
 
Presentation劉思竹v4.2 10122608
Presentation劉思竹v4.2 10122608Presentation劉思竹v4.2 10122608
Presentation劉思竹v4.2 10122608思竹 劉
 
Enhancing foreign language learning 0313
Enhancing foreign language learning 0313Enhancing foreign language learning 0313
Enhancing foreign language learning 0313Gen Yen Wu
 
Case study: evaluation of a tool for searching inside a collection of multimo...
Case study: evaluation of a tool for searching inside a collection of multimo...Case study: evaluation of a tool for searching inside a collection of multimo...
Case study: evaluation of a tool for searching inside a collection of multimo...ronchet
 
EUROCALL Teacher Education SIG Workshop 2010 Presentation Nathalie Gettliffe
EUROCALL Teacher Education SIG Workshop 2010 Presentation Nathalie GettliffeEUROCALL Teacher Education SIG Workshop 2010 Presentation Nathalie Gettliffe
EUROCALL Teacher Education SIG Workshop 2010 Presentation Nathalie GettliffeThe Open University
 
Presentation 2
Presentation 2Presentation 2
Presentation 2s10122609
 
Presentation 1021014(v3)
Presentation 1021014(v3)Presentation 1021014(v3)
Presentation 1021014(v3)思竹 劉
 
2010 teresa's report2003
2010 teresa's report20032010 teresa's report2003
2010 teresa's report2003york1896
 
Equitable assessment of the practical component of scientific modules
Equitable assessment of the practical component of scientific modulesEquitable assessment of the practical component of scientific modules
Equitable assessment of the practical component of scientific moduleslinioti
 
Collection of papers on english as a second language
Collection of papers on english as a second languageCollection of papers on english as a second language
Collection of papers on english as a second languageZaidi Zakaria
 
ResearchMethodologyLecture1.ppt
ResearchMethodologyLecture1.pptResearchMethodologyLecture1.ppt
ResearchMethodologyLecture1.pptJubilinAlbania
 
H nathalie gettliffe_sig_eurocall2010lyon[1]
H nathalie gettliffe_sig_eurocall2010lyon[1]H nathalie gettliffe_sig_eurocall2010lyon[1]
H nathalie gettliffe_sig_eurocall2010lyon[1]nickyjohnson
 
The impact of delivery on research & technology
The impact of delivery on  research & technologyThe impact of delivery on  research & technology
The impact of delivery on research & technologyMelda Yildiz
 
Classroom research
Classroom researchClassroom research
Classroom researchIsabel Matos
 
Trends and Innovations in Introductory CS Course
Trends and Innovations in Introductory CS CourseTrends and Innovations in Introductory CS Course
Trends and Innovations in Introductory CS CourseAayushee Gupta
 
Chia li chen 9922604 2011.1.12
Chia li chen 9922604 2011.1.12Chia li chen 9922604 2011.1.12
Chia li chen 9922604 2011.1.129922604
 
UTPL-LANGUAGE TESTING-II-BIMESTRE-(OCTUBRE 2011-FEBRERO 2012)
UTPL-LANGUAGE TESTING-II-BIMESTRE-(OCTUBRE 2011-FEBRERO 2012)UTPL-LANGUAGE TESTING-II-BIMESTRE-(OCTUBRE 2011-FEBRERO 2012)
UTPL-LANGUAGE TESTING-II-BIMESTRE-(OCTUBRE 2011-FEBRERO 2012)Videoconferencias UTPL
 
Barriers faced by international students on understanding the spoken content ...
Barriers faced by international students on understanding the spoken content ...Barriers faced by international students on understanding the spoken content ...
Barriers faced by international students on understanding the spoken content ...decolonisingdmu
 

Similar to Proposal presentation v2 1020107 (20)

Effect of language in learning college organic chemistry
Effect of language in learning college organic chemistryEffect of language in learning college organic chemistry
Effect of language in learning college organic chemistry
 
developing and integrating courseware for oral presentations into esp learnin...
developing and integrating courseware for oral presentations into esp learnin...developing and integrating courseware for oral presentations into esp learnin...
developing and integrating courseware for oral presentations into esp learnin...
 
Presentation劉思竹v4.2 10122608
Presentation劉思竹v4.2 10122608Presentation劉思竹v4.2 10122608
Presentation劉思竹v4.2 10122608
 
Enhancing foreign language learning 0313
Enhancing foreign language learning 0313Enhancing foreign language learning 0313
Enhancing foreign language learning 0313
 
Case study: evaluation of a tool for searching inside a collection of multimo...
Case study: evaluation of a tool for searching inside a collection of multimo...Case study: evaluation of a tool for searching inside a collection of multimo...
Case study: evaluation of a tool for searching inside a collection of multimo...
 
EUROCALL Teacher Education SIG Workshop 2010 Presentation Nathalie Gettliffe
EUROCALL Teacher Education SIG Workshop 2010 Presentation Nathalie GettliffeEUROCALL Teacher Education SIG Workshop 2010 Presentation Nathalie Gettliffe
EUROCALL Teacher Education SIG Workshop 2010 Presentation Nathalie Gettliffe
 
Presentation 2
Presentation 2Presentation 2
Presentation 2
 
Presentation 1021014(v3)
Presentation 1021014(v3)Presentation 1021014(v3)
Presentation 1021014(v3)
 
2010 teresa's report2003
2010 teresa's report20032010 teresa's report2003
2010 teresa's report2003
 
Equitable assessment of the practical component of scientific modules
Equitable assessment of the practical component of scientific modulesEquitable assessment of the practical component of scientific modules
Equitable assessment of the practical component of scientific modules
 
Collection of papers on english as a second language
Collection of papers on english as a second languageCollection of papers on english as a second language
Collection of papers on english as a second language
 
ResearchMethodologyLecture1.ppt
ResearchMethodologyLecture1.pptResearchMethodologyLecture1.ppt
ResearchMethodologyLecture1.ppt
 
H nathalie gettliffe_sig_eurocall2010lyon[1]
H nathalie gettliffe_sig_eurocall2010lyon[1]H nathalie gettliffe_sig_eurocall2010lyon[1]
H nathalie gettliffe_sig_eurocall2010lyon[1]
 
The impact of delivery on research & technology
The impact of delivery on  research & technologyThe impact of delivery on  research & technology
The impact of delivery on research & technology
 
Classroom research
Classroom researchClassroom research
Classroom research
 
Trends and Innovations in Introductory CS Course
Trends and Innovations in Introductory CS CourseTrends and Innovations in Introductory CS Course
Trends and Innovations in Introductory CS Course
 
Medium of instruction in the L2 classroom
Medium of instruction in the L2 classroomMedium of instruction in the L2 classroom
Medium of instruction in the L2 classroom
 
Chia li chen 9922604 2011.1.12
Chia li chen 9922604 2011.1.12Chia li chen 9922604 2011.1.12
Chia li chen 9922604 2011.1.12
 
UTPL-LANGUAGE TESTING-II-BIMESTRE-(OCTUBRE 2011-FEBRERO 2012)
UTPL-LANGUAGE TESTING-II-BIMESTRE-(OCTUBRE 2011-FEBRERO 2012)UTPL-LANGUAGE TESTING-II-BIMESTRE-(OCTUBRE 2011-FEBRERO 2012)
UTPL-LANGUAGE TESTING-II-BIMESTRE-(OCTUBRE 2011-FEBRERO 2012)
 
Barriers faced by international students on understanding the spoken content ...
Barriers faced by international students on understanding the spoken content ...Barriers faced by international students on understanding the spoken content ...
Barriers faced by international students on understanding the spoken content ...
 

Proposal presentation v2 1020107

  • 1. Presenter: Sze-Chu Liu Instructor: Dr. Pi-Ying Teresa Hsu Date: January 7, 2013
  • 3. INTRODUCTION  Background of the Study  Purposes of the Study  Research Question  Definition of the Terms Proposal Presentation 3
  • 4. Background of the Study  A report recently released shows that the proficiency of English of Taiwan adults is ranked 30 and categorized into “intermediate-low level”, falling behind neighboring countries such as Japan and Korea. (Education First, 2012) Proposal Presentation 4
  • 5. Purpose of the Study  The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of computer-assisted pronunciation training in English for vocational college students in Taiwan, evaluating the improvement of pronunciation quality. Proposal Presentation 5
  • 6. Research Question  Are computer-assisted pronunciation training tools effective in improving pronunciation quality for vocational college students? Proposal Presentation 6
  • 7. Definition of the Terms  CAPT = Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training  CALL = Computer Assisted Language Learning Proposal Presentation 7
  • 8. Literature Review  An important tenet of structural linguistics was that the primary medium of language is oral: Speech is language. (Richards & Rodgers, 2001:p.55) Proposal Presentation 8
  • 9. Literature Review  The areas where CALL-based pedagogy outpaces conventional materials are in the provision of:  individual plans  anywhere / anytime instruction  patient tutoring  a private space to make mistakes  immediate, individualized instruction  detailed records of achievement  self-paced learning. (Nunan, 2011:p.216) Proposal Presentation 9
  • 10. Literature Review  Neri et al. (2008)  A CAPT system is used to teach a group of 11-year-old native Italian children in English as a foreign language.  The improvement made by experimental group and control group was comparable.  The time used by experimental group is half of control group.  Teaching with CAPT helped experimental group improve their pronunciation of difficult and unknown words significantly. Proposal Presentation 10
  • 11. Literature Review  Hardison (2004)  A CAPT tool with automatic feedback of the speaker’s intonation in form of filtered oscillograms on computer screen is used.  Experimental results revealed significant effects of computer-assisted training in the acquisition of second laguage prosody and generalization to segmental accuracy and novel sentences.  A real-time visual display received positive comments from participants. Proposal Presentation 11
  • 13. Participants Experimental Control Group Group Second-year students in a vocational Participants university Numbers 45 45  Ranked and listed according to their averaged scores of first-year General English courses Sampling  Systematic sample with a random start combined with stratification from the middle 60% Proposal Presentation 13
  • 14. Research Design Proposal Presentation 14
  • 15. Instruments  MyET Proposal Presentation 15
  • 16. Procedures Training Pre-test Post-test Procedure Proposal Presentation 16
  • 17. Training Procedure Experimental Control Group Group Teacher Taught by the same teacher Syllabus Elementary level oral practice Period One session per week for 12 weeks  Blended  Traditional teaching with teaching CAPT  80 minutes per Sampling  40 minutes session teach-led  40 minutes with CAPT Proposal Presentation 17
  • 18. Rating Procedure The pronunciation quality of each utterance is scored on a 100-point scale. S1 S2 S90 Sentence#1 Audio file #1 Sentence #2 Audio file #2 Sentence #50 Audio file #50
  • 19. Rating Procedure Proposal Presentation 19
  • 20. Pilot Study  Two small groups of students with similar demographic background will be studied in the pilot study. Proposal Presentation 20
  • 21. Statistical Analysis  Cronbach alpha test  On the scores given by three raters and MyET  To test the reliability of measurements  ANOVA (F-test)  On the pretest and posttest scores  To examine the difference of teaching effectiveness between experimental groups and control groups Proposal Presentation 21