This document discusses several key theorists and concepts related to representation in media. It outlines semiotics as the study of signs and how meaning is conveyed. Laura Mulvey's 1975 work introduced the concept of the male gaze, where women are represented as passive objects for the male viewer's erotic pleasure. Richard Dyer and Steve Neale built on this, discussing how representations reinforce male dominance and encourage identification with powerful masculine ideals. The document also discusses signifiers, signifieds, stereotypes, and analytical frameworks from Dyer and Neale.
2. Aims and Outcomes
By the end of this session you
should be able to:
Identify key terminology in
regards to theoretical approaches
of representation.
Discuss key theoretical
perspectives with reference to
moving image.
3. Semiotics
Semiotics is the study of signs and sign systems.
Developed by Ferdinand de Saussure considered
how language denotes meaning.
Semiotics is concerned with how meaning is
created and conveyed in texts and, in particular, in
narratives.
Signs can be words, images, sounds, odours,
flavors, acts, gestures, words and objects.
Semiotics foregrounds the process of
representation.
4. Signs
Semioticians believe that:
Everything is a sign (or a symbol that represents
something else)
Signs are composed of two parts –
1. the signifier
2. what is signified by that signifier
SIGNIFIER + SIGNIFIED = SIGN.
The signifier is usually an object, or icon, or symbol that we
recognize; the form which the sign takes.
What is signified is total meaning that results from
associating the signifier with the signified- the concept it
represents.
The relationship between the signifier and signified—
and this is crucial—is random, unmotivated and
unnatural.
5. Laura Mulvey- Male Gaze
Mulvey is a feminist film scholar.
Wrote ‘Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema’
(1975)- one of the most widely cited articles
in the whole of contemporary film theory.
She analysed Hollywood Cinema and argued
that female characters are were represented
as passive objects of male desire
Her theory ‘Male Gaze’ – male characters are
‘bearers of the look’ which is aimed at
physically sexually, submissive and desirable
females.
Female viewers must experience the
narrative secondarily, by identification with
the male.
6. Laura Mulvey
Mulvey states that the role of a female character in a
narrative has two functions
1. As an erotic object for characters within the narrative to
view
2. As an erotic object for the spectators within the cinema
to view
Mulvey argues the female character offer no real
importance herself, the female character exists in
relation to the male.
Active narrative roles of making things happen and
controlling events, usually falls to the male character,
while the female character remains passively decorative.
Relegates women to the status of objects- spectacle to
be looked at.
Theory suggests that the male gaze denies women
human identity.
7. Laura Mulvey
Scopophilia- means the ‘Pleasure in Looking’
Cinema offers voyeuristic pleasures – visual
pleasures. Various features of cinema viewing
conditions facilitate for the viewer both the
voyeuristic process of objectification of female
characters and also the narcissistic process of
identification with an ‘ideal ego’ seen on the
screen.
Male scopophilic desires satisfied.
Women connote ‘to-be-looked-at-ness’.
Men look, women are looked at.
8. Analysing Male Gaze
◦ What are the characters (the bearers of the look)
shown to be looking at?
◦ What is the camera looking?
◦ What is the audience expected to be looking at?
◦ What are the purposes of the shots of the male and
female characters?
◦ Who is the presumed spectator?
◦ Which characters are dominant and which are
submissive?
James Bond Rear Window
9. Richard Dyer
Dyer draws on Mulvey’s work to argue
that ways of looking reassert male
dominance.
He suggests that images of men aimed
at women undermine those codes.
When men are objectified they will
attempt to resist the gaze of the camera
– they may look away, close their eyes,
wear sunglasses, look aggressive. They
tend to be doing something, i.e. being
active not just posing.
10. Dyer’s Typography (1985)
Dyer identifies four questions to ask of a
representation:
1. What is represented?
2. How is this representative of social
groups?
3. Who is responsible for the
representation?
4. What does the audience make of it?
11. Stereotypes.
Media representations often use stereotypes as a
cultural shorthand.
Dyer argues stereotypes are a way of reinforcing
differences between people, and representing these
differences as natural.
Stereotypes reinforce the idea that there are big
differences between different types of people.
Stereotypes legitimise inequality
12.
13. Steve Neale.
Wrote “Masculinity as spectacle: Reflections on
men and mainstream cinema” (1993)
Illustrates how identification is not a simple matter
of ‘men identifying with male figures on the screen
and women identifying with female figures’ but it
has much more substance to it.
His theory- Narcissistic identification- the act of
identifying and aspiring to replace oneself with the
representation of the powerful, omnipotent figure of
masculinity.
Male’s are encouraged to identify with this ‘ideal
male alter ego’- power, mastery and control.
14. Steve Neale
Suggests this is presented through current
ideologies such as aggression, power and
control.
May provoke feelings of anxiety and
insecurities.
Male body can actively be the spectacle but
is disqualified as an erotic object in
Hollywood cinema.
Fetishism lets male bodies to become objects
on the screen as well, but in a different, non-
erotic way.
Fetishist gaze- ‘it is heavily meditated by the
looks of the character involved. And these
looks are marked not by desire, but rather by
fear, or hatred, or agression.’ (Neale, 1993,
15. Ferdinand de Saussure
Semiotics
signifier
form
signified
represents
Visual Pleasure and
Narrative Cinema
1975
patriarchal society
active
passive
‘as image’
bearer of the look’
male gaze
Scopophilia
Objectified
• what is represented?
• how is this
representative?
• who is responsible?
• what does the
audience make of it?
• stereotypes
• reinforces
• inequality
•1993
• narcissistic
identification
• male
• “ideal ego”
• fetishist gaze
Texts can be viewed as being similar to speech and as implying grammars or languages that make the texts meaningful. Codes and conventions make the signs in a narrative understandable and also shape the actions.
This is a theory which you can use and that you can apply to your own films. I want you to take 2 minutes in your groups to discuss about how you can apply semiotics to your pieces. Think about the decisions you have made in terms of character costumes and props you have used ? What did you want to put across by making these choices. You may not have thought about it consciously but you will have done it subconsciously. As we are surrounded by all signs all the time.
Female objectification is related to Mulvey’s male gaze.
Patriarchal society has structured film form.
Most people do it, movie making and movie viewing have been analysed as socophilic practices. We sit in a darkened theatre and observe the activities of people on the screen who are unware that they are being watched. Mulvey argues that various features of cinema viewing conditions facilitate for the viewer both the voyeuristic process of objectification of female characters and also the narcissistic process of identification with an ‘ideal ego’ seen on the screen.
This is one of the more complex theories to apply, but think about this theory in rather to your own films. Does your film encourage the audience to look through a male perspective? Are there females in your film passive character? What are their uses? Are they attractive?
This is extremely important in your own pieces, as you need to ask yourself these questions in relation to your own piece. When looking at what does an audience make of it, you did questionnaires and pilot the story to potential audiences to get their opinions.
What is represented?
What information, through the use of media language, does the text give you about characters, subject matter or place?
How is this representative?
What does the text suggest is typical? What does it suggest about particular social groups (Think of AS TV Drama: gender, age, ethnicity, regional identity, social class etc.)
Stereotype? Countertype?
Positive? Negative?
Does it reinforce or challenge the dominant ideology?
Who is responsible?
Consider filmmakers and institutions. Independent or commercial? What is their agenda?
Why would we want to represent things in a certain way..
Think about:
target audience
Genre
Commercial aspect
Artistic expression
What does the audience make of it?
What might be the audience response be?
Not everyone will respond in the same way, consider different audiences.
This is one the easiest theories you can apply to your own film. We are surrounded by stereotypes in media. In your own groups, I want you to take 2 minutes to discuss if you have used stereotypes in your own films, whether this is done consciously or subconsciously. You may not have realised you had done it, but describe your characters, and discuss why you chose specific character traits. This all feeds into the representations of your own characters?
He highlights how there are numerous discussions about the representation of women in cinema yet, the images of heterosexual masculinity offered by the cinema have been rarely discussed and analysed.
In your own films do you have a strong male protagonist? Are there characters who male audiences members can display this ideal alter ego? Are they strong, physically dominating? Are they the main characters and do they hold all the power? Do characters fear them?