SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 92
Download to read offline
www.tugraz.at ■
SCIENCE


PASSION


TECHNOLOGY
MASTER’S THESIS PRESENTATION
1
Empirical Analysis of
Automated Editing of Raw
Learning Video Footage
David Nußbaumer


28.04.2022
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
2
Structure
1. Introduction


2. Methodology


3. Results


4. Conclusion
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
3
Introduction (1)
A. Core of the Thesis
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
4
Introduction (1)
A. Core of the Thesis


Evaluation Manual Editing vs. Automated Editing
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
5
Introduction (1)
A. Core of the Thesis


Evaluation Manual Editing vs. Automated Editing


Can time be saved and quality preserved?
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
6
Introduction (1)
A. Core of the Thesis


Evaluation Manual Editing vs. Automated Editing


Can time be saved and quality preserved?


Survey and workflow time tracking
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
7
Introduction (2)
B. Learning Videos
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
8
Introduction (2)
B. Learning Videos


Specific Type “Frontal Lecture / Studio Recording”
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
9
Introduction (2)
B. Learning Videos


Specific Type “Frontal Lecture / Studio Recording”


Recording with teleprompter (screen) text
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
10
Introduction (2)
B. Learning Videos


Specific Type “Frontal Lecture / Studio Recording”


Recording with teleprompter (screen) text
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
11
Introduction (2)
B. Learning Videos


Specific Type “Frontal Lecture / Studio Recording”


Recording with teleprompter (screen) text
… Die Schülerinnen und Schüler können


diese also nicht nur im Gegenstand


Informatik beziehungsweise


Digitale Grundbildung erarbeiten, sondern


auch in den Fächern Bewegung und Sport,


Bildnerische Erziehung …
Screen Text:
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
12
Introduction (3)
C. Video Editing
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
13
Introduction (3)
C. Video Editing


Part of Postproduction
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
14
Introduction (3)
C. Video Editing


Part of Postproduction


Take the best (parts) and leave the rest
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
15
Introduction (3)
C. Video Editing


Part of Postproduction


Take the best (parts) and leave the rest


Concatenate parts in a way that viewers are not
distracted
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
16
Introduction (4)
C. Video Editing
… Die Schülerinnen und Schüler können


diese also nicht nur im Gegenstand


Informatik beziehungsweise


Digitale Grundbildung erarbeiten, sondern


auch in den Fächern Bewegung und Sport,


Bildnerische Erziehung …
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
17
Introduction (4)
C. Video Editing
… Die Schülerinnen und Schüler können


diese also nicht nur im Gegenstand


Informatik beziehungsweise


Digitale Grundbildung erarbeiten, sondern


auch in den Fächern Bewegung und Sport,


Bildnerische Erziehung …
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
18
Introduction (4)
C. Video Editing
… Die Schülerinnen und Schüler können


diese also nicht nur im Gegenstand


Informatik beziehungsweise


Digitale Grundbildung erarbeiten, sondern


auch in den Fächern Bewegung und Sport,


Bildnerische Erziehung …
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
19
Introduction (4)
C. Video Editing
… Die Schülerinnen und Schüler können


diese also nicht nur im Gegenstand


Informatik beziehungsweise


Digitale Grundbildung erarbeiten, sondern


auch in den Fächern Bewegung und Sport,


Bildnerische Erziehung …
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
20
Introduction (4)
C. Video Editing
… Die Schülerinnen und Schüler können


diese also nicht nur im Gegenstand


Informatik beziehungsweise


Digitale Grundbildung erarbeiten, sondern


auch in den Fächern Bewegung und Sport,


Bildnerische Erziehung …
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
21
Introduction (4)
C. Video Editing
… Die Schülerinnen und Schüler können


diese also nicht nur im Gegenstand


Informatik beziehungsweise


Digitale Grundbildung erarbeiten, sondern


auch in den Fächern Bewegung und Sport,


Bildnerische Erziehung …
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
22
Introduction (4)
C. Video Editing
… Die Schülerinnen und Schüler können


diese also nicht nur im Gegenstand


Informatik beziehungsweise


Digitale Grundbildung erarbeiten, sondern


auch in den Fächern Bewegung und Sport,


Bildnerische Erziehung …
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
23
Introduction (4)
C. Video Editing
Two Segments / One Cut
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
24
Introduction (4)
C. Video Editing
Two Segments / One Cut
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
25
Introduction (5)
D. Video Quality
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
26
Introduction (5)
D. Video Quality


QoS: Quality of Service
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
27
Introduction (5)
D. Video Quality


QoS: Quality of Service


QoE: Quality of Experience
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
28
Introduction (5)
D. Video Quality


QoS: Quality of Service


QoE: Quality of Experience


QoP: Quality of Perception
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
29
Introduction (6)
E. „Good” Learning Videos should
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
30
Introduction (6)
E. „Good” Learning Videos should


Visualize content (Mayer, 2002).
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
31
Introduction (6)
E. „Good” Learning Videos should


Visualize content (Mayer, 2002).


Avoid unnecessary audio noise (Richardson, 1998)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
32
Introduction (6)
E. „Good” Learning Videos should


Visualize content (Mayer, 2002).


Avoid unnecessary audio noise (Richardson, 1998)


Maintain a consistent (sound) volume (Robinson et al., 2003)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
33
Introduction (6)
E. „Good” Learning Videos should


Visualize content (Mayer, 2002).


Avoid unnecessary audio noise (Richardson, 1998)


Maintain a consistent (sound) volume (Robinson et al., 2003)


Implement as discreet cuts as possible (Lima et al., 2012)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
34
Methodology (1)
A. Reference Videos
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
35
Methodology (1)
A. Reference Videos


Ten Raw Recordings with belonging Screen Text
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
36
Methodology (1)
A. Reference Videos


Ten Raw Recordings with belonging Screen Text


Length between 50s and 4min
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
37
Methodology (1)
A. Reference Videos


Ten Raw Recordings with belonging Screen Text


Length between 50s and 4min


One to Five Takes
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
38
Methodology (1)
A. Reference Videos


Ten Raw Recordings with belonging Screen Text


Length between 50s and 4min


One to Five Takes


German / English and Male / Female Split
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
A. Reference Videos
39
Methodology (1)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Measure Time
40
Methodology (2)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Measure Time


Manual Workflow performed by Video Editors
tracked with Stopwatch
41
Methodology (2)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Measure Time


Manual Workflow performed by Video Editors
tracked with Stopwatch


Corresponding Steps tracked with Process Time in
Automated Workflow
42
Methodology (2)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Measure Time


Manual Workflow performed by Video Editors
tracked with Stopwatch


Corresponding Steps tracked with Process Time in
Automated Workflow


Direct Time Consumption Comparison
43
Methodology (2)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Measure Time
44
Methodology (2)
Manual Workflow
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Measure Time
45
Methodology (2)
Automated


Workflow
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
C. Measure Quality
46
Methodology (3)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
C. Measure Quality


Two videos and two versions
47
Methodology (3)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
C. Measure Quality


Two videos and two versions


Embedded in an Online Survey (LimeSurvey)
48
Methodology (3)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
C. Measure Quality


Two videos and two versions


Embedded in an Online Survey (LimeSurvey)


Rating Questions about Quality (QoP and QoE)
49
Methodology (3)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
C. Measure Quality


Two videos and two versions


Embedded in an Online Survey (LimeSurvey)


Rating Questions about Quality (QoP and QoE)


Open Question
50
Methodology (3)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
C. Measure Quality


Two videos and two versions


Embedded in an Online Survey (LimeSurvey)


Rating Questions about Quality (QoP and QoE)


Open Question


t-Test for Significance
51
Methodology (3)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
C. Measure Quality
52
Methodology (3)
Video 2 Video 3
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
C. Measure Quality
53
Methodology (3)
Video 2 Video 3
manually | automatically manually | automatically
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
C. Measure Quality
54
Methodology (3)
Video 2 Video 3
manually | automatically manually | automatically
Group A Evaluation
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
C. Measure Quality
55
Methodology (3)
Video 2 Video 3
manually | automatically manually | automatically
Group B Evaluation
Group A Evaluation
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
C. Measure Quality


1. The words were pronounced clearly and distinctly.


2. I can learn well with this learning video.


3. Generally I like this video.


4. The content of the video matches the subtitles.


5. Image Quality is good in my opinion.


6. Sound Quality is good in my opinion.
56
Methodology (3)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
C. Measure Quality


1. The words were pronounced clearly and distinctly.


2. I can learn well with this learning video.


3. Generally I like this video.


4. The content of the video matches the subtitles.


5. Image Quality is good in my opinion.


6. Sound Quality is good in my opinion.
57
Methodology (3)
QoP
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
C. Measure Quality


1. The words were pronounced clearly and distinctly.


2. I can learn well with this learning video.


3. Generally I like this video.


4. The content of the video matches the subtitles.


5. Image Quality is good in my opinion.


6. Sound Quality is good in my opinion.
58
Methodology (3)
QoP
QoE
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
C. Measure Quality


1. The words were pronounced clearly and distinctly.


2. I can learn well with this learning video.


3. Generally I like this video.


4. The content of the video matches the subtitles.


5. Image Quality is good in my opinion.


6. Sound Quality is good in my opinion.
59
Methodology (3)
QoP
QoE
Open Question: What was particularly good or bad?
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
A. Time Consumption
60
Results (1)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
A. Time Consumption
61
Results (1)
Video
Time: Manual
Workflow
Time: Automated
Workflow
Time Saved in %
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
A. Time Consumption
62
Results (1)
Video
Time: Manual
Workflow
Time: Automated
Workflow
Time Saved in %
1 193s
2 250s
3 141s
4 101s
5 91s
6 80s
7 60s
8 261s
9 171s
10 273s
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
A. Time Consumption
63
Results (1)
Video
Time: Manual
Workflow
Time: Automated
Workflow
Time Saved in %
1 193s 44s
2 250s 23s
3 141s 35s
4 101s 19s
5 91s 23s
6 80s 22s
7 60s 19s
8 261s 73s
9 171s 40s
10 273s 48s
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
A. Time Consumption
64
Results (1)
Video
Time: Manual
Workflow
Time: Automated
Workflow
Time Saved in %
1 193s 44s 77 %
2 250s 23s 90 %
3 141s 35s 75 %
4 101s 19s 81 %
5 91s 23s 74 %
6 80s 22s 72 %
7 60s 19s 68 %
8 261s 73s 72 %
9 171s 40s 76 %
10 273s 48s 82 %
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
A. Time Consumption
65
Results (1)
Video
Time: Manual
Workflow
Time: Automated
Workflow
Time Saved in %
1 193s 44s 77 %
2 250s 23s 90 %
3 141s 35s 75 %
4 101s 19s 81 %
5 91s 23s 74 %
6 80s 22s 72 %
7 60s 19s 68 %
8 261s 73s 72 %
9 171s 40s 76 %
10 273s 48s 82 %
Automated Workflow on average 76% faster (SD 6%)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality
66
Results (2)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality


129 Participants in Online Survey
67
Results (2)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality


129 Participants in Online Survey


Group A: 74 Participants


Group B: 55 Participants
68
Results (2)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality


129 Participants in Online Survey


Group A: 74 Participants (V2 M - V3 A)


Group B: 55 Participants (V2 A - V3 M)
69
Results (2)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality


129 Participants in Online Survey


Group A: 74 Participants (V2 M - V3 A)


Group B: 55 Participants (V2 A - V3 M)


85 men and 44 women
70
Results (2)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality


129 Participants in Online Survey


Group A: 74 Participants (V2 M - V3 A)


Group B: 55 Participants (V2 A - V3 M)


85 men and 44 women


Content watched mostly on Smartphones with
built-in Speakers (44.2% / 30.2%)
71
Results (2)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality


129 Participants in Online Survey


Group A: 74 Participants (V2 M - V3 A)


Group B: 55 Participants (V2 A - V3 M)


85 men and 44 women


Content watched mostly on Smartphones with
built-in Speakers (44.2% / 30.2%)


Participants learn with videos at least a few times
a month or more often(61.3%)
72
Results (2)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality
73
Results (3)
Question
Video 2 Video 3
Manual Automated t-Test Manual Automated t-Test
The words were pronounced
clearly and distinctly.
I can learn well with
this learning video.
Generally I like this
video.
The content of the
video matches the subtitles.
Image quality is good
in my opinion.
Sound quality is good
in my opinion.
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality
74
Results (3)
Question
Video 2 Video 3
Manual Automated t-Test Manual Automated t-Test
The words were pronounced
clearly and distinctly. 3.6 3.9 0.35
I can learn well with
this learning video. 3.1 2.6 0.03
Generally I like this
video. 3.2 3.0 0.47
The content of the
video matches the subtitles. 3.7 4.0 0.22
Image quality is good
in my opinion. 4.0 4.0 0.58
Sound quality is good
in my opinion. 3.8 4.0 0.34
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality
75
Results (3)
Question
Video 2 Video 3
Manual Automated t-Test Manual Automated t-Test
The words were pronounced
clearly and distinctly. 3.6 3.9 0.35
I can learn well with
this learning video. 3.1 2.6 0.03
Generally I like this
video. 3.2 3.0 0.47
The content of the
video matches the subtitles. 3.7 4.0 0.22
Image quality is good
in my opinion. 4.0 4.0 0.58
Sound quality is good
in my opinion. 3.8 4.0 0.34
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality
76
Results (3)
Question
Video 2 Video 3
Manual Automated t-Test Manual Automated t-Test
The words were pronounced
clearly and distinctly. 3.6 3.9 0.35 4.2 4.1 0.58
I can learn well with
this learning video. 3.1 2.6 0.03 3.1 3.3 0.53
Generally I like this
video. 3.2 3.0 0.47 3.6 3.6 0.98
The content of the
video matches the subtitles. 3.7 4.0 0.22 4.0 3.9 0.63
Image quality is good
in my opinion. 4.0 4.0 0.58 4.2 4.1 0.64
Sound quality is good
in my opinion. 3.8 4.0 0.34 4.2 4.0 0.43
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality
77
Results (3)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality
78
Results (3)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality
79
Results (4) What did you find particularly bad about the learning


Video?
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality
80
Results (4)
Video 2
Manually Edited
10 %
12 %
45 %
32 %
Greenscreen is distracting
Missing visualization of the content
Audio Quality Lacking
Other (General Comments)
What did you find particularly bad about the learning


Video?
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality
81
Results (4)
Video 2
Manually Edited
10 %
12 %
45 %
32 %
Greenscreen is distracting
Missing visualization of the content
Audio Quality Lacking
Other (General Comments)
Video 2
Automatically
Edited
7 %
65 %
28 %
What did you find particularly bad about the learning


Video?
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality


Only one quality question has a statistically
significant difference (automated rated worse than
manually)
82
Results (5)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
B. Preserving Quality


Only one quality question has a statistically
significant difference (automated rated worse than
manually)


Other quality factors are not influenced
83
Results (5)
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
84
Conclusion
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
85
Conclusion
1. Time can be saved drastically
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
86
Conclusion
1. Time can be saved drastically


2. Quality can almost be preserved
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
87
Conclusion
1. Time can be saved drastically


2. Quality can almost be preserved


3. Not following principles of multimedia content creation can


affect quality
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
88
Conclusion
1. Time can be saved drastically


2. Quality can almost be preserved


3. Not following principles of multimedia content creation can


affect quality


4. Indiscreet Cuts can distract viewers from content
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
89
Conclusion
1. Time can be saved drastically


2. Quality can almost be preserved


3. Not following principles of multimedia content creation can


affect quality


4. Indiscreet Cuts can distract viewers from content


5. Bad Audio Quality affects the viewers concentration
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
90
Conclusion
1. Time can be saved drastically


2. Quality can almost be preserved


3. Not following principles of multimedia content creation can


affect quality


4. Indiscreet Cuts can distract viewers from content


5. Bad Audio Quality affects the viewers concentration


6. Greenscreen should be avoided
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
Thank you for your time and attention.
91
Fin
www.tugraz.at ■
28.04.2022
David Nußbaumer
Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of


Raw Learning Video Footage
Cho, Sunghyun, Jue Wang, and Seungyong Lee (Aug. 2012). Video deblurring
for hand-held cameras using patch-based synthesis". In: ACM Transactions
on Graphics 31.4, pp. 1{9. doi: 10.1145/2185520.2185560.
Lima, Edirlei Soares de et al. (July 2012). Automatic Video Editing for Video-
Based Interactive Storytelling". In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on
Multimedia and Expo. IEEE. doi: 10.1109/icme.2012.83.
Mayer, Richard E. (2002). Multimedia Learning". In: The Annual Report of Educational
Psychology in Japan. Vol. 41, pp. 27-29.
Richardson, Craig H. (1998). Improving Audio Quality in Distance Learning Applications."
In: Distance Learning '98. Proceedings of the AnnualConference
on Distance Teaching and Learning (14th, Madison,WI, August 5-7, 1998).
Robinson, Charles Q., Steve R. Lyman, and Je rey Riedmiller (2003). Intelligent
Program Loudness Measurement and Control: What Satis
fi
es Listeners?"



92
References

More Related Content

Similar to Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of Raw Learning Video Footage

Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
wolllfie
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_brief
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_brief Ig3 music_video_assignment_brief
Ig3 music_video_assignment_brief
CallumWallace
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
danielharrison12
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1) Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
ReeceEcR
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1) Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
danhops888
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1) Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
ShannonOrr
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
SarahMurrayy
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
LewisDunn
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
LydiaCharlotteCooke
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
LouiseMaher18
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
AlexNesbit
 
IG3 music video assignment 2013 to 2014
 IG3 music video assignment 2013 to 2014 IG3 music video assignment 2013 to 2014
IG3 music video assignment 2013 to 2014
shaunaeleacy
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
justin96
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1) Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
emilyaldredd
 
_ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 2
    _ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 2    _ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 2
_ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 2
reecemechan
 
_ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 (1)
    _ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 (1)    _ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 (1)
_ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 (1)
Megan Hughes
 
IG2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015
IG2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 IG2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015
IG2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015
DeclanTyldsley
 

Similar to Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of Raw Learning Video Footage (20)

Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_brief
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_brief Ig3 music_video_assignment_brief
Ig3 music_video_assignment_brief
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1) Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1) Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1) Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 
IG 3 Brief
IG 3 Brief IG 3 Brief
IG 3 Brief
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 
IG3 music video assignment 2013 to 2014
 IG3 music video assignment 2013 to 2014 IG3 music video assignment 2013 to 2014
IG3 music video assignment 2013 to 2014
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014
 
Keyframe-based Video Summarization Designer
Keyframe-based Video Summarization DesignerKeyframe-based Video Summarization Designer
Keyframe-based Video Summarization Designer
 
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
 Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1) Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
Ig3 music_video_assignment_2013_to_2014 (1)
 
_ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 2
    _ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 2    _ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 2
_ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 2
 
_ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 (1)
    _ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 (1)    _ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 (1)
_ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 (1)
 
IG2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015
IG2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015 IG2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015
IG2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015
 
_ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015
    _ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015    _ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015
_ig2 music video production assignment 2014 to 2015
 

More from Educational Technology

More from Educational Technology (20)

The use of programming tasks in interactive videos to increase learning effec...
The use of programming tasks in interactive videos to increase learning effec...The use of programming tasks in interactive videos to increase learning effec...
The use of programming tasks in interactive videos to increase learning effec...
 
Analysis of students' behavior watching iMooX courses with interactive elements
Analysis of students' behavior watching iMooX courses with interactive elementsAnalysis of students' behavior watching iMooX courses with interactive elements
Analysis of students' behavior watching iMooX courses with interactive elements
 
Portability of Mobile Applications
Portability of Mobile ApplicationsPortability of Mobile Applications
Portability of Mobile Applications
 
Erhebung von Lernaktivitäten in einem Pop-Up-Makerspace mit einer technischen...
Erhebung von Lernaktivitäten in einem Pop-Up-Makerspace mit einer technischen...Erhebung von Lernaktivitäten in einem Pop-Up-Makerspace mit einer technischen...
Erhebung von Lernaktivitäten in einem Pop-Up-Makerspace mit einer technischen...
 
Mixed Reality im Distance Learning in der Hochschullehre
Mixed Reality im Distance Learning in der HochschullehreMixed Reality im Distance Learning in der Hochschullehre
Mixed Reality im Distance Learning in der Hochschullehre
 
Development of a WCAG theme for a learning management system
Development of a WCAG theme for a learning management systemDevelopment of a WCAG theme for a learning management system
Development of a WCAG theme for a learning management system
 
Math trainer as a chatbot via system(push) messages for Android
Math trainer as a chatbot via system(push) messages for AndroidMath trainer as a chatbot via system(push) messages for Android
Math trainer as a chatbot via system(push) messages for Android
 
Fächerintegrativer Unterricht am Beispiel der Leichtathletik
Fächerintegrativer Unterricht am Beispiel der LeichtathletikFächerintegrativer Unterricht am Beispiel der Leichtathletik
Fächerintegrativer Unterricht am Beispiel der Leichtathletik
 
DENKEN UND TECHNIK Über manipulative Auswirkungen von Internettechnologien
DENKEN UND TECHNIK Über manipulative Auswirkungen von InternettechnologienDENKEN UND TECHNIK Über manipulative Auswirkungen von Internettechnologien
DENKEN UND TECHNIK Über manipulative Auswirkungen von Internettechnologien
 
Empfehlungen für den Unterricht im Fach Informatik für Menschen mit Autismus-...
Empfehlungen für den Unterricht im Fach Informatik für Menschen mit Autismus-...Empfehlungen für den Unterricht im Fach Informatik für Menschen mit Autismus-...
Empfehlungen für den Unterricht im Fach Informatik für Menschen mit Autismus-...
 
Entwicklung eines Online-Kurses für digitale Kompetenzen für Studienanfänger:...
Entwicklung eines Online-Kurses für digitale Kompetenzen für Studienanfänger:...Entwicklung eines Online-Kurses für digitale Kompetenzen für Studienanfänger:...
Entwicklung eines Online-Kurses für digitale Kompetenzen für Studienanfänger:...
 
School Start Screening Tool
School Start Screening ToolSchool Start Screening Tool
School Start Screening Tool
 
Development of a mobile French language learning platform
Development of a mobile French language learning platformDevelopment of a mobile French language learning platform
Development of a mobile French language learning platform
 
Learning Analytics and Spelling Acquisition in German - the Path to Indivdual...
Learning Analytics and Spelling Acquisition in German - the Path to Indivdual...Learning Analytics and Spelling Acquisition in German - the Path to Indivdual...
Learning Analytics and Spelling Acquisition in German - the Path to Indivdual...
 
Learning Analytics and MOOCs
Learning Analytics and MOOCsLearning Analytics and MOOCs
Learning Analytics and MOOCs
 
Fächerintegrativer Unterricht am Beispiel des Lernroboters Thymio
Fächerintegrativer Unterricht am Beispiel des Lernroboters ThymioFächerintegrativer Unterricht am Beispiel des Lernroboters Thymio
Fächerintegrativer Unterricht am Beispiel des Lernroboters Thymio
 
Einsatz von Mixed Reality im Klassenzimmer
Einsatz von Mixed Reality im KlassenzimmerEinsatz von Mixed Reality im Klassenzimmer
Einsatz von Mixed Reality im Klassenzimmer
 
Chatbots for Brand Representation in Comparison with Traditional Websites
Chatbots for Brand Representation in Comparison with Traditional WebsitesChatbots for Brand Representation in Comparison with Traditional Websites
Chatbots for Brand Representation in Comparison with Traditional Websites
 
Development of a learning diary for a MOOC platform
Development of a learning diary for a MOOC platformDevelopment of a learning diary for a MOOC platform
Development of a learning diary for a MOOC platform
 
Potential of Bots for Encylclopedias
Potential of Bots for EncylclopediasPotential of Bots for Encylclopedias
Potential of Bots for Encylclopedias
 

Recently uploaded

Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please PractiseSpellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
AnaAcapella
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
negromaestrong
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptxThird Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
 
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please PractiseSpellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
psychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docxpsychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docx
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
 
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding  Accommodations and ModificationsUnderstanding  Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
 
Asian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptx
Asian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptxAsian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptx
Asian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptx
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...
Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...
Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
 
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdfUGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
 

Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of Raw Learning Video Footage

  • 1. www.tugraz.at ■ SCIENCE PASSION 
 TECHNOLOGY MASTER’S THESIS PRESENTATION 1 Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of Raw Learning Video Footage David Nußbaumer 28.04.2022
  • 2. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 2 Structure 1. Introduction 2. Methodology 3. Results 4. Conclusion
  • 3. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 3 Introduction (1) A. Core of the Thesis
  • 4. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 4 Introduction (1) A. Core of the Thesis Evaluation Manual Editing vs. Automated Editing
  • 5. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 5 Introduction (1) A. Core of the Thesis Evaluation Manual Editing vs. Automated Editing Can time be saved and quality preserved?
  • 6. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 6 Introduction (1) A. Core of the Thesis Evaluation Manual Editing vs. Automated Editing Can time be saved and quality preserved? Survey and workflow time tracking
  • 7. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 7 Introduction (2) B. Learning Videos
  • 8. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 8 Introduction (2) B. Learning Videos Specific Type “Frontal Lecture / Studio Recording”
  • 9. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 9 Introduction (2) B. Learning Videos Specific Type “Frontal Lecture / Studio Recording” Recording with teleprompter (screen) text
  • 10. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 10 Introduction (2) B. Learning Videos Specific Type “Frontal Lecture / Studio Recording” Recording with teleprompter (screen) text
  • 11. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 11 Introduction (2) B. Learning Videos Specific Type “Frontal Lecture / Studio Recording” Recording with teleprompter (screen) text … Die Schülerinnen und Schüler können diese also nicht nur im Gegenstand Informatik beziehungsweise Digitale Grundbildung erarbeiten, sondern auch in den Fächern Bewegung und Sport, Bildnerische Erziehung … Screen Text:
  • 12. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 12 Introduction (3) C. Video Editing
  • 13. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 13 Introduction (3) C. Video Editing Part of Postproduction
  • 14. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 14 Introduction (3) C. Video Editing Part of Postproduction Take the best (parts) and leave the rest
  • 15. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 15 Introduction (3) C. Video Editing Part of Postproduction Take the best (parts) and leave the rest Concatenate parts in a way that viewers are not distracted
  • 16. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 16 Introduction (4) C. Video Editing … Die Schülerinnen und Schüler können diese also nicht nur im Gegenstand Informatik beziehungsweise Digitale Grundbildung erarbeiten, sondern auch in den Fächern Bewegung und Sport, Bildnerische Erziehung …
  • 17. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 17 Introduction (4) C. Video Editing … Die Schülerinnen und Schüler können diese also nicht nur im Gegenstand Informatik beziehungsweise Digitale Grundbildung erarbeiten, sondern auch in den Fächern Bewegung und Sport, Bildnerische Erziehung …
  • 18. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 18 Introduction (4) C. Video Editing … Die Schülerinnen und Schüler können diese also nicht nur im Gegenstand Informatik beziehungsweise Digitale Grundbildung erarbeiten, sondern auch in den Fächern Bewegung und Sport, Bildnerische Erziehung …
  • 19. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 19 Introduction (4) C. Video Editing … Die Schülerinnen und Schüler können diese also nicht nur im Gegenstand Informatik beziehungsweise Digitale Grundbildung erarbeiten, sondern auch in den Fächern Bewegung und Sport, Bildnerische Erziehung …
  • 20. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 20 Introduction (4) C. Video Editing … Die Schülerinnen und Schüler können diese also nicht nur im Gegenstand Informatik beziehungsweise Digitale Grundbildung erarbeiten, sondern auch in den Fächern Bewegung und Sport, Bildnerische Erziehung …
  • 21. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 21 Introduction (4) C. Video Editing … Die Schülerinnen und Schüler können diese also nicht nur im Gegenstand Informatik beziehungsweise Digitale Grundbildung erarbeiten, sondern auch in den Fächern Bewegung und Sport, Bildnerische Erziehung …
  • 22. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 22 Introduction (4) C. Video Editing … Die Schülerinnen und Schüler können diese also nicht nur im Gegenstand Informatik beziehungsweise Digitale Grundbildung erarbeiten, sondern auch in den Fächern Bewegung und Sport, Bildnerische Erziehung …
  • 23. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 23 Introduction (4) C. Video Editing Two Segments / One Cut
  • 24. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 24 Introduction (4) C. Video Editing Two Segments / One Cut
  • 25. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 25 Introduction (5) D. Video Quality
  • 26. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 26 Introduction (5) D. Video Quality QoS: Quality of Service
  • 27. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 27 Introduction (5) D. Video Quality QoS: Quality of Service QoE: Quality of Experience
  • 28. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 28 Introduction (5) D. Video Quality QoS: Quality of Service QoE: Quality of Experience QoP: Quality of Perception
  • 29. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 29 Introduction (6) E. „Good” Learning Videos should
  • 30. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 30 Introduction (6) E. „Good” Learning Videos should Visualize content (Mayer, 2002).
  • 31. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 31 Introduction (6) E. „Good” Learning Videos should Visualize content (Mayer, 2002). Avoid unnecessary audio noise (Richardson, 1998)
  • 32. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 32 Introduction (6) E. „Good” Learning Videos should Visualize content (Mayer, 2002). Avoid unnecessary audio noise (Richardson, 1998) Maintain a consistent (sound) volume (Robinson et al., 2003)
  • 33. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 33 Introduction (6) E. „Good” Learning Videos should Visualize content (Mayer, 2002). Avoid unnecessary audio noise (Richardson, 1998) Maintain a consistent (sound) volume (Robinson et al., 2003) Implement as discreet cuts as possible (Lima et al., 2012)
  • 34. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 34 Methodology (1) A. Reference Videos
  • 35. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 35 Methodology (1) A. Reference Videos Ten Raw Recordings with belonging Screen Text
  • 36. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 36 Methodology (1) A. Reference Videos Ten Raw Recordings with belonging Screen Text Length between 50s and 4min
  • 37. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 37 Methodology (1) A. Reference Videos Ten Raw Recordings with belonging Screen Text Length between 50s and 4min One to Five Takes
  • 38. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 38 Methodology (1) A. Reference Videos Ten Raw Recordings with belonging Screen Text Length between 50s and 4min One to Five Takes German / English and Male / Female Split
  • 39. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage A. Reference Videos 39 Methodology (1)
  • 40. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Measure Time 40 Methodology (2)
  • 41. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Measure Time Manual Workflow performed by Video Editors tracked with Stopwatch 41 Methodology (2)
  • 42. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Measure Time Manual Workflow performed by Video Editors tracked with Stopwatch Corresponding Steps tracked with Process Time in Automated Workflow 42 Methodology (2)
  • 43. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Measure Time Manual Workflow performed by Video Editors tracked with Stopwatch Corresponding Steps tracked with Process Time in Automated Workflow Direct Time Consumption Comparison 43 Methodology (2)
  • 44. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Measure Time 44 Methodology (2) Manual Workflow
  • 45. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Measure Time 45 Methodology (2) Automated 
 Workflow
  • 46. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage C. Measure Quality 46 Methodology (3)
  • 47. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage C. Measure Quality Two videos and two versions 47 Methodology (3)
  • 48. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage C. Measure Quality Two videos and two versions Embedded in an Online Survey (LimeSurvey) 48 Methodology (3)
  • 49. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage C. Measure Quality Two videos and two versions Embedded in an Online Survey (LimeSurvey) Rating Questions about Quality (QoP and QoE) 49 Methodology (3)
  • 50. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage C. Measure Quality Two videos and two versions Embedded in an Online Survey (LimeSurvey) Rating Questions about Quality (QoP and QoE) Open Question 50 Methodology (3)
  • 51. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage C. Measure Quality Two videos and two versions Embedded in an Online Survey (LimeSurvey) Rating Questions about Quality (QoP and QoE) Open Question t-Test for Significance 51 Methodology (3)
  • 52. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage C. Measure Quality 52 Methodology (3) Video 2 Video 3
  • 53. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage C. Measure Quality 53 Methodology (3) Video 2 Video 3 manually | automatically manually | automatically
  • 54. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage C. Measure Quality 54 Methodology (3) Video 2 Video 3 manually | automatically manually | automatically Group A Evaluation
  • 55. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage C. Measure Quality 55 Methodology (3) Video 2 Video 3 manually | automatically manually | automatically Group B Evaluation Group A Evaluation
  • 56. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage C. Measure Quality 1. The words were pronounced clearly and distinctly. 2. I can learn well with this learning video. 3. Generally I like this video. 4. The content of the video matches the subtitles. 5. Image Quality is good in my opinion. 6. Sound Quality is good in my opinion. 56 Methodology (3)
  • 57. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage C. Measure Quality 1. The words were pronounced clearly and distinctly. 2. I can learn well with this learning video. 3. Generally I like this video. 4. The content of the video matches the subtitles. 5. Image Quality is good in my opinion. 6. Sound Quality is good in my opinion. 57 Methodology (3) QoP
  • 58. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage C. Measure Quality 1. The words were pronounced clearly and distinctly. 2. I can learn well with this learning video. 3. Generally I like this video. 4. The content of the video matches the subtitles. 5. Image Quality is good in my opinion. 6. Sound Quality is good in my opinion. 58 Methodology (3) QoP QoE
  • 59. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage C. Measure Quality 1. The words were pronounced clearly and distinctly. 2. I can learn well with this learning video. 3. Generally I like this video. 4. The content of the video matches the subtitles. 5. Image Quality is good in my opinion. 6. Sound Quality is good in my opinion. 59 Methodology (3) QoP QoE Open Question: What was particularly good or bad?
  • 60. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage A. Time Consumption 60 Results (1)
  • 61. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage A. Time Consumption 61 Results (1) Video Time: Manual Workflow Time: Automated Workflow Time Saved in % 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
  • 62. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage A. Time Consumption 62 Results (1) Video Time: Manual Workflow Time: Automated Workflow Time Saved in % 1 193s 2 250s 3 141s 4 101s 5 91s 6 80s 7 60s 8 261s 9 171s 10 273s
  • 63. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage A. Time Consumption 63 Results (1) Video Time: Manual Workflow Time: Automated Workflow Time Saved in % 1 193s 44s 2 250s 23s 3 141s 35s 4 101s 19s 5 91s 23s 6 80s 22s 7 60s 19s 8 261s 73s 9 171s 40s 10 273s 48s
  • 64. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage A. Time Consumption 64 Results (1) Video Time: Manual Workflow Time: Automated Workflow Time Saved in % 1 193s 44s 77 % 2 250s 23s 90 % 3 141s 35s 75 % 4 101s 19s 81 % 5 91s 23s 74 % 6 80s 22s 72 % 7 60s 19s 68 % 8 261s 73s 72 % 9 171s 40s 76 % 10 273s 48s 82 %
  • 65. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage A. Time Consumption 65 Results (1) Video Time: Manual Workflow Time: Automated Workflow Time Saved in % 1 193s 44s 77 % 2 250s 23s 90 % 3 141s 35s 75 % 4 101s 19s 81 % 5 91s 23s 74 % 6 80s 22s 72 % 7 60s 19s 68 % 8 261s 73s 72 % 9 171s 40s 76 % 10 273s 48s 82 % Automated Workflow on average 76% faster (SD 6%)
  • 66. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality 66 Results (2)
  • 67. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality 129 Participants in Online Survey 67 Results (2)
  • 68. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality 129 Participants in Online Survey Group A: 74 Participants Group B: 55 Participants 68 Results (2)
  • 69. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality 129 Participants in Online Survey Group A: 74 Participants (V2 M - V3 A) Group B: 55 Participants (V2 A - V3 M) 69 Results (2)
  • 70. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality 129 Participants in Online Survey Group A: 74 Participants (V2 M - V3 A) Group B: 55 Participants (V2 A - V3 M) 85 men and 44 women 70 Results (2)
  • 71. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality 129 Participants in Online Survey Group A: 74 Participants (V2 M - V3 A) Group B: 55 Participants (V2 A - V3 M) 85 men and 44 women Content watched mostly on Smartphones with built-in Speakers (44.2% / 30.2%) 71 Results (2)
  • 72. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality 129 Participants in Online Survey Group A: 74 Participants (V2 M - V3 A) Group B: 55 Participants (V2 A - V3 M) 85 men and 44 women Content watched mostly on Smartphones with built-in Speakers (44.2% / 30.2%) Participants learn with videos at least a few times a month or more often(61.3%) 72 Results (2)
  • 73. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality 73 Results (3) Question Video 2 Video 3 Manual Automated t-Test Manual Automated t-Test The words were pronounced clearly and distinctly. I can learn well with this learning video. Generally I like this video. The content of the video matches the subtitles. Image quality is good in my opinion. Sound quality is good in my opinion.
  • 74. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality 74 Results (3) Question Video 2 Video 3 Manual Automated t-Test Manual Automated t-Test The words were pronounced clearly and distinctly. 3.6 3.9 0.35 I can learn well with this learning video. 3.1 2.6 0.03 Generally I like this video. 3.2 3.0 0.47 The content of the video matches the subtitles. 3.7 4.0 0.22 Image quality is good in my opinion. 4.0 4.0 0.58 Sound quality is good in my opinion. 3.8 4.0 0.34
  • 75. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality 75 Results (3) Question Video 2 Video 3 Manual Automated t-Test Manual Automated t-Test The words were pronounced clearly and distinctly. 3.6 3.9 0.35 I can learn well with this learning video. 3.1 2.6 0.03 Generally I like this video. 3.2 3.0 0.47 The content of the video matches the subtitles. 3.7 4.0 0.22 Image quality is good in my opinion. 4.0 4.0 0.58 Sound quality is good in my opinion. 3.8 4.0 0.34
  • 76. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality 76 Results (3) Question Video 2 Video 3 Manual Automated t-Test Manual Automated t-Test The words were pronounced clearly and distinctly. 3.6 3.9 0.35 4.2 4.1 0.58 I can learn well with this learning video. 3.1 2.6 0.03 3.1 3.3 0.53 Generally I like this video. 3.2 3.0 0.47 3.6 3.6 0.98 The content of the video matches the subtitles. 3.7 4.0 0.22 4.0 3.9 0.63 Image quality is good in my opinion. 4.0 4.0 0.58 4.2 4.1 0.64 Sound quality is good in my opinion. 3.8 4.0 0.34 4.2 4.0 0.43
  • 77. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality 77 Results (3)
  • 78. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality 78 Results (3)
  • 79. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality 79 Results (4) What did you find particularly bad about the learning Video?
  • 80. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality 80 Results (4) Video 2 Manually Edited 10 % 12 % 45 % 32 % Greenscreen is distracting Missing visualization of the content Audio Quality Lacking Other (General Comments) What did you find particularly bad about the learning Video?
  • 81. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality 81 Results (4) Video 2 Manually Edited 10 % 12 % 45 % 32 % Greenscreen is distracting Missing visualization of the content Audio Quality Lacking Other (General Comments) Video 2 Automatically Edited 7 % 65 % 28 % What did you find particularly bad about the learning Video?
  • 82. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality Only one quality question has a statistically significant difference (automated rated worse than manually) 82 Results (5)
  • 83. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage B. Preserving Quality Only one quality question has a statistically significant difference (automated rated worse than manually) Other quality factors are not influenced 83 Results (5)
  • 84. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 84 Conclusion
  • 85. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 85 Conclusion 1. Time can be saved drastically
  • 86. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 86 Conclusion 1. Time can be saved drastically 2. Quality can almost be preserved
  • 87. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 87 Conclusion 1. Time can be saved drastically 2. Quality can almost be preserved 3. Not following principles of multimedia content creation can 
 affect quality
  • 88. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 88 Conclusion 1. Time can be saved drastically 2. Quality can almost be preserved 3. Not following principles of multimedia content creation can 
 affect quality 4. Indiscreet Cuts can distract viewers from content
  • 89. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 89 Conclusion 1. Time can be saved drastically 2. Quality can almost be preserved 3. Not following principles of multimedia content creation can 
 affect quality 4. Indiscreet Cuts can distract viewers from content 5. Bad Audio Quality affects the viewers concentration
  • 90. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage 90 Conclusion 1. Time can be saved drastically 2. Quality can almost be preserved 3. Not following principles of multimedia content creation can 
 affect quality 4. Indiscreet Cuts can distract viewers from content 5. Bad Audio Quality affects the viewers concentration 6. Greenscreen should be avoided
  • 91. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage Thank you for your time and attention. 91 Fin
  • 92. www.tugraz.at ■ 28.04.2022 David Nußbaumer Empirical Analysis of Automated Editing of 
 Raw Learning Video Footage Cho, Sunghyun, Jue Wang, and Seungyong Lee (Aug. 2012). Video deblurring for hand-held cameras using patch-based synthesis". In: ACM Transactions on Graphics 31.4, pp. 1{9. doi: 10.1145/2185520.2185560. Lima, Edirlei Soares de et al. (July 2012). Automatic Video Editing for Video- Based Interactive Storytelling". In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. IEEE. doi: 10.1109/icme.2012.83. Mayer, Richard E. (2002). Multimedia Learning". In: The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan. Vol. 41, pp. 27-29. Richardson, Craig H. (1998). Improving Audio Quality in Distance Learning Applications." In: Distance Learning '98. Proceedings of the AnnualConference on Distance Teaching and Learning (14th, Madison,WI, August 5-7, 1998). Robinson, Charles Q., Steve R. Lyman, and Je rey Riedmiller (2003). Intelligent Program Loudness Measurement and Control: What Satis fi es Listeners?"
 
 92 References